Search

Background: Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) antibodies, which have been reported in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), may impair TFPI activity and contribute to hypercoagulability, but their role in APS and in thrombosis remains undefined., Objective/methods: We assessed the presence and avidity of TFPI IgG antibodies, associations with protein C IgG antibodies and associations with clinical disease severity, in 50 patients with thrombotic APS and 50 thrombotic control patients, on long term anticoagulation with warfarin., Results: Thrombotic APS patients had a significantly higher prevalence of TFPI IgG antibodies (40%; 20/50) compared to thrombotic controls (18%; 9/50). TFPI antibodies were predominantly high avidity in APS (50%, 10/20 of positive patients) and strongly associated with a severe thrombotic phenotype (venous and arterial thromboembolism or recurrent thromboembolic episodes despite therapeutic anticoagulation) (odds ratio (OR): 12.0, 95%CI: 2.2-66.1, p = 0.004), while thrombotic control patients mainly showed low avidity antibodies (78%, 7/9 of positive patients). Coexistence of TFPI and protein C IgG antibodies, regardless of their avidity, was strongly associated with a more severe thrombotic phenotype in APS patients (OR: 20.2, 95%CI: 2.0-47.0, p < 0.0001) and also in thrombotic controls (OR: 75.0, 95%CI 1.2-195, p = 0.02)., Conclusions: Coexistent TFPI and protein C IgG antibodies, irrespective of their avidity, may be a useful marker for a severe thrombotic phenotype in thrombotic patients. This suggests a possibly pathophysiological relationship between the two antibodies, predisposing to thrombosis with a possibly more general role in the development of thrombotic complications., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Preeclampsia is characterized by maternal systemic inflammation and coagulation activation, akin to the sepsis syndrome. Recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC; drotrecogin alfa [activated]) may modify disease progression to safely prolong pregnancies and improve perinatal outcomes. Both maternal and perinatal risks are highest remote from term., Study Design: Open-label, single arm safety and efficacy trial of rhAPC in consenting pregnant women with severe early-onset preeclampsia. Disease severity-matched rhAPC-naïve controls were identified from an existing database. An additional six women were recruited as biomarker controls., Main Outcome Measures: Primary safety outcome: incidence of peripartum bleeding; primary efficacy outcome: duration of pregnancy after enrolment., Results: Twelve (31.6%) of 38 eligible women consented; 3 did not receive the infusion due to staffing. Therefore, 9 women received rhAPC (24 μg/kg/hr for ≤96 h antenatally). No safety issues were identified. There was a marginal prolongation in eligibility-to-delivery intervals for women receiving rhAPC (Mantel-Cox p = 0.052; Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon p = 0.049). Compared with both the pre-infusion phase in the rhAPC-treated women themselves and with fullPIERS rhAPC-naïve women, rhAPC was associated with increased urine output during the infusion (6/9 vs 1/9 had urine output >100 mL/h during the infusion, Fisher's exact p = 0.003)., Conclusions: These data support further investigation of APC in women with severe early-onset preeclampsia; recombinant and purified human APC is available. In addition, these data will inform the design and implementation of randomized controlled trials aiming to modify and/or moderate the proinflammatory and proacoagulant state of preeclampsia., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a severe lung disease of preterm infants, which is characterized by fewer, enlarged alveoli and increased inflammation. BPD has grave consequences for affected infants, but no effective and safe therapy exists. We previously showed that prophylactic treatment with interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) prevents murine BPD induced by perinatal inflammation and hyperoxia. Here, we used the same BPD model to assess whether an alternative anti-inflammatory agent, protein C (PC), is as effective as IL-1Ra against BPD. We also tested whether delayed administration or a higher dose of IL-1Ra affects its ability to ameliorate BPD and investigated aspects of drug safety. Pups were reared in room air (21% O 2 ) or hyperoxia (65% or 85% O 2 ) and received daily injections with vehicle, 1200 IU/kg PC, 10 mg/kg IL-1Ra (early or late onset) or 100 mg/kg IL-1Ra. After 3 or 28 days, lung and brain histology were assessed and pulmonary cytokines were analysed using ELISA and cytokine arrays. We found that PC only moderately reduced the severe impact of BPD on lung structure (e.g. 18% increased alveolar number by PC versus 34% by IL-1Ra); however, PC significantly reduced IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-6 and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2 by up to 89%. IL-1Ra at 10 mg/kg prevented BPD more effectively than 100 mg/kg IL-1Ra, but only if treatment commenced at day 1 of life. We conclude that prophylactic low-dose IL-1Ra and PC ameliorate BPD and have potential as the first remedy for one of the most devastating diseases preterm babies face., (© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine.)

During an episode of sepsis, systemic inflammatory response phenomenon triggers a series of procoagulant mechanisms. It has been suggested that the use of activated protein C could play a role in the management of this pathology, but there is no consensus. Searching in Epistemonikos database, which is maintained by screening multiple databases, we identified seven systematic reviews covering 35 primary studies addressing the question of this article, including six randomized trials. We extracted data, combined the evidence using meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table following the GRADE approach. We concluded activated protein C in sepsis probably does not decrease the mortality rate and increases the rate of hemorrhagic events.

Background and Purpose: The advent of intra-arterial neurothrombectomy (IAT) for acute ischemic stroke opens a potentially transformative opportunity to improve neuroprotection studies. Combining a putative neuroprotectant with recanalization could produce more powerful trials but could introduce heterogeneity and adverse event possibilities. We sought to demonstrate feasibility of IAT in neuroprotectant trials by defining IAT selection criteria for an ongoing neuroprotectant clinical trial., Methods: The study drug, 3K3A-APC, is a pleiotropic cytoprotectant and may reduce thrombolysis-associated hemorrhage. The NeuroNEXT trial NN104 (RHAPSODY) is designed to establish a maximally tolerated dose of 3K3A-APC. Each trial site provided their IAT selection criteria. An expert panel reviewed site criteria and published evidence. Finally, the trial leadership designed IAT selection criteria., Results: Derived selection criteria reflected consistency among the sites and comparability to published IAT trials. A protocol amendment allowing IAT (and relaxed age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and time limits) in the RHAPSODY trial was implemented on June 15, 2015. Recruitment before and after the amendment improved from 8 enrolled patients (601 screened, 1.3%) to 51 patients (821 screened, 6.2%; odds ratio [95% confidence limit] of 4.9 [2.3-10.4]; P<0.001). Gross recruitment was 0.11 patients per site month versus 0.43 patients per site per month, respectively, before and after the amendment., Conclusions: It is feasible to include IAT in a neuroprotectant trial for acute ischemic stroke. Criteria are presented for including such patients in a manner that is consistent with published evidence for IAT while still preserving the ability to test the role of the putative neuroprotectant., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02222714., (© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Purpose: To determine whether protein C zymogen (protein C concentrates or human protein C) improves clinically relevant outcomes in adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock., Methods: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial that from September 2012 to June 2014 enrolled adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and high risk of death and of bleeding (e.g., APACHE II greater than 25, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or disseminated intravascular coagulopathy). All patients completed their follow-up 90 days after randomization and data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Follow-up was performed at 30 and 90 days after randomization. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay and/or 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included mortality., Results: The study was stopped early in a situation of futility for the composite outcome of prolonged ICU stay and/or 30-day mortality that was 79 % (15 patients) in the protein C zymogen group and 67 % (12 patients) in the placebo group (p = 0.40) and for a concomitant safety issue: ICU mortality was 79 % (15 patients) in the protein C zymogen group vs 39 % (7 patients) in the placebo group (p = 0.020), and 30-day mortality was 68 vs 39 % (p = 0.072)., Conclusion: Protein C zymogen did not improve clinically relevant outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock adult patients. Given its high cost and the potential increase in mortality, the use of this drug in adult patients should be discouraged.

Severe congenital protein C (PC) deficiency (SCPCD) is associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), purpura fulminans (PF), and vascular thromboembolic events (TE), often leading to organ failure and death. PC replacement therapy offers a safe, effective treatment for thromboembolic complications of SCPCD and secondary prophylaxis for recurrent DIC, PF, and TEs. A prospective, multi-centre, open-label, phase 2/3 study was conducted to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of protein C concentrate for treatment of PF and acute TEs. Fifteen enrolled patients with SCPCD received protein C concentrate; 11 received treatment for acute TEs (PF, 18 events; PF and other coumarin-related vascular thromboembolic events [coumarin-induced skin necrosis; CISN], 1 event; venous thrombosis, 5 events). Pre-defined efficacy criteria for treatment of acute TEs were compared with a historical control arm (i. e. patients receiving conventional therapy without protein C replacement). PF/CISN was demonstrated by pre-defined primary and secondary efficacy ratings. Primary ratings of protein C concentrate-treated episodes were significantly higher (p=0.0032) than in the historical control. For 19 PF/CISN episodes in 11 patients, 94.7 % of treatments were rated effective and 5.3 % effective with complications (not related to protein C concentrate). In a secondary efficacy rating, all treatments were rated effective (68.4 % excellent; 21.1 % good; 10.5 % fair). For 5/24 vascular thrombosis episodes, 80 % of treatments were rated excellent and 20 % were rated good. No treatment-related adverse events or serious adverse events occurred. In conclusion, protein C concentrate provides an efficacious, safe treatment for PF, CISN, and other TEs in SCPCD patients.

It is imperative to maintain normal blood flow to provide adequate oxygen supply to specific organs and cells, as well as for the removal of metabolic byproducts. Therefore, any situation that results in blood clotting can injure or kill living tissues. In this paper, we describe a case where a protein C deficient subject who would, by all medical indicators, be at 100 % risk of experiencing thrombophlebitis, deep vein thrombosis, and or lung emboli, is able to escape all pathologies by using perioperative zymogen protein C (ZPC). This protein C deficient patient has a long history of blood clotting, particularly from surgical procedures. The patient is 81 years old and first experienced clotting due to hernia surgery in 1964, when he was hospitalized for 16 days post-surgery with life threatening complications. It was later determined in 1980, after many episodes, that the patient had hereditary protein C deficiency at the 38 % level. In his hernia surgery, perioperative ZPC was used along with accepted anticoagulation procedures with no blood clots or other related side effects occurring. This procedure can greatly benefit protein C deficient patients, and could potentially find use for non-PC deficient patients in surgeries and a variety of other medical treatments. This particular case helps to validate the importance of ZPC in effecting safer surgery in high-risk patients. It also supports the mechanism of ZPC acting as an anticoagulant without causing bleeding. Most importantly, each clinical case study represents a unique combination of surgeon, hematologist, medical staff, and patient functioning as a coordinated team. In this case, smaller amounts of very expensive ZPC achieved safe and efficacious results, which is hugely important for future clinical applications when considering the production cost of ZPC. More studies must be done to establish minimum dosing while achieving safe and efficacious outcomes.

Objectives: Activated protein C (APC), an endogenous anticoagulant, has antithrombotic, fibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory properties. We recently conducted a controlled study (APCAP, activated protein C in severe acute pancreatitis) of APC treatment of patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Here we studied the effect of APC on the pivotal coagulation parameters of the surviving patients in the APCAP study., Methods: The study consisted of 20 patients of whom 10 patients had received APC and 10 patients had received placebo. Coagulation parameters, physiological anticoagulants, thrombograms and circulating levels of IL-6 and CRP were determined on admission and at days 1, 3-4 and 6-7., Results: During follow-up, the temporal levels of prothrombin time (PT) decreased and the temporal levels of thromboplastin time (TT) increased in placebo group (p< 0.001 for both), but not in APC group. The temporal levels of antithrombin (AT) increased less in APC group than in placebo group (p = 0.011). The shapes of the SAP patients' thrombograms were strongly deranged and were marginally affected by APC treatment., Conclusions: Coagulopathy in SAP, a complex phenomenon, is not alleviated by APC treatment. Rather, the patients receiving APC are heading toward normal homeostasis of coagulation slower than patients receiving placebo.

Objective: An increased risk of bleeding is observed in patients receiving activated protein C (APC), which may be a limiting factor for the application of novel APC therapies. Since APC's therapeutic effects often require its cytoprotective activities on cells but not APC's anticoagulant activities, an agent that specifically antagonizes APC's anticoagulant effects but not its cytoprotective effects could provide an effective means to control concerns for risk of bleeding. We hypothesized that superFVa, an engineered activated FVa-variant that restores hemostasis in hemophilia could reduce APC-induced bleeding., Approach and Results: SuperFVa was engineered with mutations of the APC cleavage sites (Arg506/306/679Gln) and a disulfide bond (Cys609-Cys1691) between the A2 and A3 domains, which augment its biological activity and cause high resistance to APC. SuperFVa normalized APC-prolonged clotting times and restored APC-suppressed thrombin generation in human and murine plasma at concentrations where wild-type (wt) FVa did not show effects. Following intravenous injection of APC into BALB/c mice, addition to whole blood ex vivo of superFVa but not wt-FVa significantly normalized whole blood clotting. Blood loss following tail clip or liver laceration was significantly reduced when superFVa was administered intravenously to BALB/c mice prior to intravenous APC-treatment. Furthermore, superFVa abolished mortality (∼50%) associated with excessive bleeding following liver laceration in mice treated with APC., Conclusions: Our results provide proof of concept that superFVa is effective in preventing APC-induced bleeding and may provide therapeutic benefits as a prohemostatic agent in various situations where bleeding is a serious risk.

Since the first description of subcutaneous protein C concentrate as treatment for severe protein C deficiency in 1996, further cases have been reported but there is no uniform approach to this form of treatment. In order to assess the safety and effectiveness of subcutaneous protein C concentrate and suggest recommendations for future use, patients who had received subcutaneous protein C concentrate were identified from the literature, by contacting the manufacturers and by personal communication. Treatment details were available from 14 cases. Apart from one case where the infusion interval was inadvertently increased, no thrombotic events occurred even when doses were subsequently reduced. Initially, a trough protein C level of >0·25 iu/ml should be aimed for. Subsequently, a smaller dose of subcutaneous protein C concentrate, especially if taken with an oral anticoagulant, may be protective maintenance treatment. The treatment was well tolerated with few side effects. Subcutaneous protein C concentrate on its own or combined with an oral anticoagulant appears to be safe and effective as maintenance treatment of severe protein C deficiency. A major advantage is the avoidance of central venous access devices. The incidence of neurodevelopmental handicap was high with blindness affecting the majority of patients., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background/aims: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients treated with hemodialysis (HD) experience a high risk of death. ESRD patients with elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines are at increased risk of death from cardiovascular events and infection. HD is often facilitated by the use of an anticoagulant. We hypothesized that the use of an anticoagulant that also possessed anti-inflammatory qualities without significant immunosuppressive effects may reduce the risk of death. In this pilot study, we sought to determine the optimal dose of activated protein C (APC) to achieve adequate regional anticoagulation for HD and determine if the drug can be safely used in ESRD patients treated with HD., Methods: Twelve stable HD patients were enrolled into this safety and dose-finding study. Varying doses of APC were administered in place of usual heparin at varying doses to determine the range of APC that can be used for extracorporeal circuit anticoagulation. Partial thromboplastin time was assessed at fixed intervals during the HD treatment., Results: The average age of study patients was 49 ± 12 years. 75% of patients were African-American and 66.7% were male. The optimal dose of APC to induce adequate anticoagulation was 24-30 μg/kg/h. No patients experienced any serious adverse events. One patient had their infusion stopped early due to refractory intradialytic hypertension., Conclusions: For ESRD patients undergoing HD, an initial starting dose of 24-30 μg/kg/h achieves a target partial thromboplastin time that should be adequate for circuit anticoagulation. This dose appears safe and was well tolerated., (© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Context: Microvascular thrombosis is a critical event in severe acute pancreatitis. Human recombinant activated protein C (Xigris®, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA) modulates the interplay between pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulant pathways and maintains microvascular patency. However, the anticoagulant properties of Xigris® may precipitate bleeding from the inflamed pancreas., Objective: This study tests the hypothesis that Xigris® can ameliorate experimental acute pancreatitis without causing pancreatic haemorrhage., Methods: Sprague Dawley rats were allocated as follows: Group 1: control (n=7); Group 2: acute pancreatitis (n=6); Group 3: administration of Xigris® 500 µg/kg body weight before induction of acute pancreatitis (n=6); and Group 4: Administration of Xigris® 500 µg/kg body weight 30 minutes after induction of acute pancreatitis (n=6). Acute pancreatitis was induced by intraperitoneal administration of L-arginine 300 mg/100 g body weight. Animals were sacrificed at 48 hours and biochemical, haematological, and histological markers of pancreatic haemorrhage and inflammation assessed., Results: Median lipase in animals with acute pancreatitis was 10 U/mL (range: 7-16 U/mL) compared to 5.5 (range: 3-8 U/mL) in controls (P=0.028). Lipase was also elevated in animals given Xigris® both before (12 U/mL, range: 8-22 U/mL; P=0.031 vs. control group) and after (46 U/mL, range: 9-71 U/mL; P=0.015 vs. control group) induction of acute pancreatitis). Haemoglobin levels were similar among all groups (P=0.323). There was no histological evidence of pancreatic haemorrhage in animals treated with Xigris®. Pre-treatment with Xigris® was associated with a significant reduction in pancreatic injury. This effect was absent when Xigris® was administered after induction of acute pancreatitis., Conclusion: Xigris® did not lead to pancreatic haemorrhage in experimental acute pancreatitis. Administration of Xigris® prior to induction of acute pancreatitis was associated with amelioration of injury. This effect was not seen with administration of Xigris® after induction of acute pancreatitis.

Background and Purpose: Activated Protein C (APC) stimulates multiple cytoprotective pathways via the protease activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) and promotes anticoagulation. 3K3A-APC was designed for preserved activity at PAR-1 with reduced anticoagulation. This Phase 1 trial characterized pharmacokinetics and anticoagulation effects of 3K3A-APC., Methods: Subjects (n=64) were randomly assigned to receive 3K3A-APC (n=4) at 6, 30, 90, 180, 360, 540 or 720 µg/kg or placebo (n=6) and were observed for 24 hr. After safety review additional subjects received drug every 12 hr for 5 doses (n=6 per group) at 90, 180, 360, or 540 µg/kg or placebo (n=8) and were observed for 24 hr., Results: All subjects returned for safety assessments at 72 hours and 15 days. We found few adverse events in all groups. Systolic blood pressure increased in both active and placebo groups. Moderately severe headache, nausea and vomiting were reported in one of two subjects treated with 720 µg/kg so 540 µg/kg was considered the highest tolerated dose. Mean plasma concentrations increased in proportion to dose. Clearance ranged from 11,693 ± 807 to 18,701 ± 4,797 mL/hr, volume of distribution ranged from 4,873±828 to 6,971 ± 1,169 mL, and elimination half-life ranged from 0.211 ± 0.097 to 0.294 ± 0.054 hours. Elevations in aPTT were minimal., Conclusions: 3K3A-APC was well tolerated at multiple doses as high as 540 µg/kg. These results should be confirmed in stroke patients with relevant co-morbidities. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01660230.

Background: Sepsis is a common and frequently fatal condition. Human recombinant activated protein C (APC) has been introduced to reduce the high risk of death associated with severe sepsis or septic shock. This systematic review is an update of a Cochrane review originally published in 2007., Objectives: We assessed the benefits and harms of APC for patients with severe sepsis or septic shock., Search Methods: We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 6); MEDLINE (2010 to June 2012); EMBASE (2010 to June 2012); BIOSIS (1965 to June 2012); CINAHL (1982 to June 2012) and LILACS (1982 to June 2012). There was no language restriction., Selection Criteria: We included randomized clinical trials assessing the effects of APC for severe sepsis or septic shock in adults and children. We excluded studies on neonates. We considered all-cause mortality at day 28 and at the end of study follow up, and hospital mortality as the primary outcomes., Data Collection and Analysis: We independently performed trial selection, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction in duplicate. We estimated relative risks (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. We measured statistical heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic. We used a random-effects model., Main Results: We identified one new randomized clinical trial in this update which includes six randomized clinical trials involving 6781 participants in total, five randomized clinical trials in adult (N = 6307) and one randomized clinical trial in paediatric (N = 474) participants. All trials had high risk of bias and were sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry. APC compared with placebo did not significantly affect all-cause mortality at day 28 compared with placebo (780/3435 (22.7%) versus 767/3346 (22.9%); RR 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.16; I(2) = 56%). APC did not significantly affect in-hospital mortality (393/1767 (22.2%) versus 379/1710 (22.1%); RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.16; I(2) = 20%). APC was associated with an increased risk of serious bleeding (113/3424 (3.3%) versus 74/3343 (2.2%); RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.94; I(2) = 0%). APC did not significantly affect serious adverse events (463/3334 (13.9%) versus 439/3302 (13.2%); RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.18; I(2) = 0%). Trial sequential analyses showed that more trials do not seem to be needed for reliable conclusions regarding these outcomes., Authors' Conclusions: This updated review found no evidence suggesting that APC should be used for treating patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. APC seems to be associated with a higher risk of bleeding. The drug company behind APC, Eli Lilly, has announced the discontinuation of all ongoing clinical trials using this drug for treating patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. APC should not be used for sepsis or septic shock outside randomized clinical trials.

Background: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) was approved for use in severe sepsis in 2001 on the basis of the Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) trial, but controversies about its effectiveness remain. We aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of use of this drug in the past 10 years and compare them with the original PROWESS results., Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, Evidence-Based Medicine, and the American College of Physicians Journal Club databases for experimental and analytical studies of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with severe sepsis until Jan 31, 2012. We calculated adjusted risk ratios for effectiveness and safety outcomes with random-effects models. We did a metaregression to assess the effect of severity of illness on the risk of death and the risk of bleeding associated with drotrecogin alfa (activated)., Findings: We included nine controlled trials (41,401 patients) and 16 single-group studies (5822 patients) in effectiveness analyses and 20 studies (8245 patients) in safety analyses. Hospital mortality was reduced by 18% with drotrecogin alfa (activated) compared with controls (relative risk 0·822, 95% CI 0·779-0·867; p<0·0001; I(2)=40%). This mortality reduction was much the same as was noted in PROWESS (0·851, 0·740-0·979), but smaller than that of patients in PROWESS with high disease severity (0·708, 0·590-0·849). Propensity-adjusted studies also showed a significant mortality reduction with lower heterogeneity (0·844, 0·800-0·891; p<0·0001, I(2)=18%). These findings were not changed by the addition of PROWESS-SHOCK results. Metaregression showed greater benefits of drotrecogin alfa (activated) with increasing control mortality (p=0·01) and more severe disease (p=0·04). Hospital mortality for single-group studies of drotrecogin alfa (activated) was 41% (95% CI 35-48), and was higher than that noted in PROWESS at 31% (27-36; p<0·0001). The serious bleeding rate with drotrecogin alfa (activated) was 5·6% (4·5-6·9), which was higher than the 3·5% (2·5-5·0) noted in PROWESS (p=0·003), but similar to that reported in PROWESS high disease severity (p=0·073)., Interpretation: Real-life use of drotrecrogin alfa (activated) was associated with significant reduction in hospital mortality and increased rates of bleeding in patients with severe sepsis. Our effectiveness findings were in line with the PROWESS trial but not with the PROWESS-SHOCK trial., Funding: None., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Licensed in 2002 for severe sepsis, drotrecogin alfa-activated (DAA) remains a much debated therapy particularly with respect to outcomes and a potentially increased risk of serious bleeding events (SBEs). Recent publications have suggested a significantly increased incidence of SBEs and death in those with baseline bleeding risks (BBRs). Our center is one of the highest prescribers of DAA worldwide; we describe our experience of SBEs and other clinical outcomes., Methods: Prospectively collected data using a clinical guideline audit tool and database to track outcome and adverse events of DAA-treated severe sepsis patients were analyzed., Results: Four hundred ninety-eight patients received DAA over an 8-year period. Hospital, critical care, and 28-day mortalities were 46.2%, 39.6%, and 35.1%, respectively. Contraindications were identified for 40 (8.0%) patients, of whom 24 (4.8%) had BBRs. Hospital mortality was 47.5% (19/40) for patients with any contraindication and 45.8% (11/24) for those with a BBR. Seventy-six (15.3%) bleeding events were reported; 22 (4.4%) were considered serious. Hospital mortality was 60.5% for patients with any bleeding event and 77.3% for those with SBEs., Conclusions: This large single-center case series demonstrates that DAA has an incidence of SBEs similar to initial clinical trials. As expected, SBEs were associated with a poor outcome., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sepsis is a common problem in preterm and term infants. The incidence of neonatal sepsis has declined, but mortality remains high. Recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) possess a broad spectrum of activity modulating coagulation and inflammation. In septic adults it may reduce mortality, but no significant benefit has been reported in children with severe sepsis., Objectives: To determine whether treatment with rhAPC reduces mortality and/or morbidity in neonatal sepsis., Search Methods: For this update searches were carried out in May 2011 of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and abstracts of annual meetings of the Pediatric Academic Societies. Doctoral dissertations, theses and the Science Citation Index for articles on activated protein C were searched. No language restriction was applied., Selection Criteria: Randomized or quasi-randomized trials, assessing the efficacy of rhAPC compared to placebo or no intervention as an adjunct to antibiotic therapy of suspected or confirmed severe sepsis in term and preterm infants less than 28 days old. Eligible trials should report at least one of the following outcomes: mortality during initial hospital stay, neurodevelopmental assessment at two years of age or later, length of hospital stay, duration of ventilation, chronic lung disease, periventricular leukomalacia, intraventricular haemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, bleeding, and any other adverse events., Data Collection and Analysis: Review authors were to independently evaluate the articles for inclusion criteria and quality, and abstract information for the outcomes of interest. Differences were to be resolved by consensus. The statistical methods were to include relative risk, risk difference, number needed to treat to benefit or number needed to treat to harm for dichotomous and weighed mean difference for continuous outcomes reported with 95% confidence intervals. A fixed effect model was to be used for meta-analysis. Heterogeneity tests, including the I(2) statistic, were to be performed to assess the appropriateness of pooling the data., Main Results: No eligible trials were identified. In October 2011 rhAPC (Xigris®) was withdrawn from the market by Eli Lilly due to a higher mortality in a trial among adults. Xigris® (DrotAA)( rhAPC) should no longer be used in any age category and the product should be returned to the distributor., Authors' Conclusions: Despite the scientific rationale for its use, there is insufficient data to use rhAPC for the management of severe sepsis in newborn infants. Due to the results among adults with lack of efficacy, an increase in bleeding and resulting withdrawal of rhAPC from the market, neonates should not be treated with rhAPC and further trials should not be conducted.

Background: Sepsis is a common and frequently fatal condition. Human recombinant activated protein C (APC) has been used to reduce the high rate of death by severe sepsis or septic shock. This is an update of a Cochrane review (originally published in 2007 and updated in 2008)., Objectives: We assessed the clinical effectiveness and safety of APC for the treatment of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock., Search Methods: For this updated review we searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 6); MEDLINE (1966 to June 2010); EMBASE (1980 to July 1, 2010); BIOSIS (1965 to July 1, 2010); CINAHL (1982 to 16 June 2010) and LILACS (1982 to 16 June 2010). There was no language restriction., Selection Criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of APC for severe sepsis in adults and children. We excluded studies on neonates. We considered all-cause mortality at day 28, at the end of study follow up, and hospital mortality as the primary outcomes., Data Collection and Analysis: We independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. We estimated relative risks (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. We measured statistical heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic. We used a random-effects model., Main Results: We identified one new RCT in this update. We included a total of five RCTs involving 5101 participants. For 28-day mortality, APC did not reduce the risk of death in adult participants with severe sepsis (pooled RR 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.22; P = 0.82, I(2) = 68%). APC use was associated with an increased risk of bleeding (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.00; P = 0.01, I(2) = 0%). In paediatric patients, APC did not reduce the risk of death (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.46; P = 0.93). Although the included trials had no major limitations most of them modified their original completion or recruitment protocols., Authors' Conclusions: This updated review found no evidence suggesting that APC should be used for treating patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Additionally, APC is associated with a higher risk of bleeding. Unless additional RCTs provide evidence of a treatment effect, policy-makers, clinicians and academics should not promote the use of APC.Warning: On October 25th 2011, the European Medicines Agency issued a press release on the worldwide withdrawal of Xigris (activated protein C / drotrecogin alfa) from the market by Eli Lilly due to lack of beneficial effect on 28-day mortality in the PROWESS-SHOCK study. Furthermore, Eli Lily has announced the discontinuation of all other ongoing clinical trials. The final results of the PROWESS-SHOCK study are expected to be published in 2012. This systematic review will be updated when results of the PROWESS-SHOCK or other trials are published.

Following the failure of PROWESS-SHOCK to demonstrate efficacy, Eli Lilly and Company withdrew drotrecogin alfa (activated) from the worldwide market. Drotrecogin was initially approved after the original trial, PROWESS, was stopped early for overwhelming efficacy. These events prompt consideration of both the initial approval decision and the later decision to withdraw. It is regrettable that the initial decision was made largely on a single trial that was stopped early. However, the decision to approve was within the bounds of normal regulatory practice and was made by many approval bodies around the world. Furthermore, the overall withdrawal rate of approved drugs remains very low. The decision to withdraw was a voluntary decision by Eli Lilly and Company and likely reflected key business considerations. Drotrecogin does have important biologic effects, and it is probable that we do not know how best to select patients who would benefit. Overall, there may still be a small advantage to drotrecogin alfa, even used non-selectively, but the costs of determining such an effect with adequate certainty are likely prohibitive, and the point is now moot. In the future, we should consider ways to make clinical trials easier and quicker so that more information can be available in a timely manner when considering regulatory approval. At the same time, more sophisticated selection of patients seems key if we are to most wisely test agents designed to manipulate the septic host response.

Purpose: We recently reported an increased incidence of serious bleeding events and mortality in patients with baseline bleeding precautions treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) compared to patients without such precautions. Whether these observations were specific to our single medical campus is unclear., Methods: All patients who received drotrecogin alfa (activated) for the treatment of severe sepsis from January 2006 through September 2009 within the South Central Veterans Affairs Health Care Network were retrospectively reviewed using a regional clinical database. Demographic information, bleeding precautions that were exclusion criteria of the PROWESS trial, and 30-day post-discharge incidences of serious bleeding events and mortality were collected., Results: Seventy-nine patients from 5 medical centers were included. Serious bleeding events occurred in 4 of 24 patients (16.7%) with any bleeding precaution vs 1 of 55 patients (1.8%) without a bleeding precaution (P=0.03). All patients (5) who experienced a serious bleeding event died compared to 39 of 74 patients (52.7%) who did not (P=0.06). Seventeen of 24 patients (70.8%) with bleeding precautions died vs 27 of 55 patients (49.1%) without bleeding precautions (P=0.07). The number of serious bleeding events did not allow meaningful multivariate analyses. The mean number of failing organs was an independent predictor of 30-day post-discharge mortality (OR 1.63 for each organ failed, 95% CI 1.05- 2.6)., Conclusions: The findings of this study were consistent with our prior observations and suggest the risk for serious bleeding events with drotrecogin alfa (activated) may outweigh any potential benefit in patients with baseline bleeding precautions.

Septic shock occurs frequently in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Standard therapy includes fluid resuscitation, the administration of antimicrobials, and source control of the infection. Adjunctive therapy with recombinant human activated protein C (rhaPC), also called drotrecogin alpha, is another treatment that is used in patients but has not been studied in SOT patients. Concerns regarding the use of this drug in this patient population include the risk of bleeding and the potential to adversely affect graft survival. Here we report the largest case series of SOT recipients with septic shock who received rhaPC. This was a retrospective chart review that looked at the impact of this drug in the SOT population. In this single-center study, we identified 17 patients with a SOT and septic shock who received rhaPC. Six of the patients underwent kidney transplants, 5 received lung transplants, 4 received cadaveric liver transplants, and 2 received combined kidney/pancreas transplants. The average APACHE II score was 26.6 ± 5.5; all patients were undergoing mechanical ventilation and receiving vasopressors at the time of rhaPC administration. Overall mortality in the group was 23.5% (4/17) at 28 days post infusion. All of the deaths were due to complications of septic shock. Allograft survival was present in 13/17 (76.5%) of the patients at 28 days. Bleeding occurred in 17.6% of patients (3/17). The use of rhaPC appears to be associated with a favorable effect on mortality, with the potential for increased risk of bleeding. Clinicians must balance this risk with the potential benefit of this drug until further research can be conducted., (© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)

This review describes some natural proteins, which can be employed, either as factor concentrates derived from human plasma or as recombinant drug, to modulate the coagulation system. I will address some biochemical characteristics and the physiological role of von Willebrand factor, the coagulation factors of the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways, and the physiological anticoagulant protein C. In addition, I will detail the pharmacological compounds, which are available for influencing or substituting the coagulation proteins: desmopressin (DDAVP), single coagulation factor concentrates, prothrombin complex concentrates, and protein C concentrate. In particular, I will address some treatment topics of general medical interest, such as the treatment of massive bleeding, the correction of the coagulopathy induced by vitamin K-antagonists in patients with cerebral haemorrhage, and of the coagulopathy of meningococcemia. Finally, I will describe some properties and practical clinical applications of the recombinant anticoagulans lepirudin and bivalirudin, which are derived from hirudin, the natural anticoagulant of the medical leech.

Purpose: The case of a patient with severe, multidrug-resistant, postoperative sepsis who was successfully treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) on two occasions is reported., Summary: After a thigh debridement procedure, a 55-year-old African-American woman developed systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) secondary to necrotizing fasciitis. Despite empiric treatment including piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin, the patient remained severely hemodynamically unstable, exhibiting signs of multiorgan failure and requiring mechanical ventilation and the placement of a tracheostomy tube. After the administration of i.v. drotrecogin alfa (activated) 160 mg (24 μg/kg/hr) over 96 hours in combination with standard i.v. antimicrobials and vasopressin, the patient's hemodynamic status improved considerably. About three weeks later, the patient again developed SIRS that was refractory to standard therapies. After the results of laboratory cultures indicated ventilator-associated pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, the woman received a second course of drotrecogin alfa and other therapies. Her condition improved and she was extubated and eventually transferred to a medical-surgical unit for continued care. While drotrecogin alfa, a recombinant form of human activated protein C (APC), has been shown to reduce mortality in adults with severe sepsis and acute organ dysfunction, previous reports indicated an increased risk of thrombotic events with the use of the drug, and there is speculation that the development of anti-APC antibodies might result in a diminished therapeutic response. In the case described here, there were no thrombotic events during or after either drotrecogin alfa infusion and no clinical evidence of antibody formation., Conclusion: A patient received two complete courses of drotrecogin alfa (activated) without any treatment-related complications.

Sepsis is defined as a systemic response to infection, characterized by an intense inflammatory response linked to coagulation activation and fibrinolysis inhibition, two processes which are intimately associated. In a field where mortality remains very high, administration of activated protein C, a physiological coagulation inhibitor with cytoprotective properties, has demonstrated its effectiveness and was able to reduce mortality. Protein C belongs to a system that involves plasma proteins and endothelial cell receptors. In addition to well documented effects on coagulation and fibrinolysis, activated protein C exhibits anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic but also anti-histone activities. Indeed, a recent study focusing on the cytoprotective effects of activated protein C showed that extracellular histones are released during severe sepsis and may participate in the pathophysiology of severe sepsis. These histones appear to be new targets of activated protein C., (© 2011 médecine/sciences - Inserm / SRMS.)

The mortality of severe sepsis is still high, despite improved treatment modalities. It is known that treatment with DAA reduces mortality in this condition; however, major bleeding may occur as a complication. We present a patient with normal findings on platelet and coagulation tests who developed multiple cerebral hemorrhages after DAA infusion. Patients with septic shock who undergo DAA infusion should be followed closely for possible intracranial bleeding. When intracranial hemorrhage is detected in patients in the intensive care unit, treatment with DAA infusion should be questioned.

Objectives: Although the mortality of severe sepsis is easily quantified, the actual cause and timing of death from severe sepsis are less defined. We used the INDEPTH (International Integrated Database for the Evaluation of Severe Sepsis and Drotrecogin alfa activated) database to investigate the reported cause of death in patients with severe sepsis., Design: Retrospective database analysis., Patients: Data from 4459 patients with severe sepsis (drotrecogin alfa activated, n = 3228; placebo, n = 1231) included in five clinical trials conducted in tertiary care institutions in 28 countries., Measurements and Main Results: We examined the cause of death and the pattern of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores near the time of death. We also evaluated the time course of biomarker levels at this late stage. A total of 1201 (27.0%) patients died during the 28-day study period. The main causes of death were as follows: sepsis-associated multiple organ failure (43.1%), refractory septic shock (22.6%), and respiratory failure (13.0%). There were no significant differences in the distributions of cause of death between drotrecogin alfa activated and placebo patients, so that all patients were combined for analysis. The mean cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score increased from 2.4, 4 days before death, to 2.9, 1 day before death, and the mean respiratory Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score increased from 2.6, 4 days before death, to 2.9, 1 day before death. The increase in these individual Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores was more prominent in patients who died early (day 0-5). Protein C levels decreased and interleukin-6 levels increased in the days before death., Conclusion: Patients with severe sepsis typically die of multiple organ failure, refractory shock, or respiratory failure. Persistent, more than worsening, organ failure is the more common pattern before death.

Background: Use of pharmacologic agents in clinical practice may differ from the manner in which they were studied in rigorous randomized clinical trials. This was a prospective, observational, noninterventional study to determine the profile of patients receiving drotrecogin alfa (activated) in clinical practice, provide additional outcome and safety data, and allow for a comparison to patients studied in the phase 3 Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) trial., Methods: A total of 548 adult patients with severe sepsis were enrolled from 61 nonteaching or academically affiliated hospitals in the United States. Patients received drotrecogin alfa (activated) as part of physician-directed therapy for severe sepsis., Results: The Xigris Use in the United States (XEUS) patients were younger (58 vs 63 years of age), had more comorbidities, and more sepsis-induced organ dysfunction at baseline compared to high-risk (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score ≥ 25) PROWESS patients who received drotrecogin alfa (activated), (cardiovascular, 85.0% vs 79.7%; hematologic, 22.3% vs 16.4%; and renal, 57.9% vs 50.7%) (all P < .05). The XEUS patients had a higher mortality rate compared to high-risk PROWESS patients receiving drotrecogin alfa (activated) (36.7% vs 30.9%; P = .062) but a similar safety profile (infusion period serious bleeding, 2.7% vs 2.2%; P = .579; 28-day serious bleeding, 3.1% vs 3.9%; P = .520). The rate of intracranial hemorrhage in XEUS was 0.2%., Conclusions: Patients receiving drotrecogin alfa (activated) in clinical practice were more acutely ill, had a higher mortality rate, but a similar safety profile with respect to serious bleeding events compared to the PROWESS trial., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Sepsis remains a challenge for intensive care physicians, as it keeps up with high mortality rate in spite of the high costs associated with its treatment. Several studies indicate that the infusion of Drotrecogin-alpha activated (DrotAA) reduce mortality in patients at high risk of death when administered early and secured the appropriate initial treatment of sepsis as recommended by Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Europe and United States of America differ regarding the criteria of high risk of death in sepsis, two or more organ dysfunctions and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 25 or more, respectively. In addition to varied definitions of high risk of death for inclusion of patients in sepsis studies, the possibility of bleeding related to drug use and intrinsic limitations related to study design led the Company to develop a new randomized, multinational, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to assess the effectiveness of drug in patients with septic shock in adults.

Purpose: The case of a patient with severe sepsis who received a bolus dose of 184 microg/kg of drotrecogin alfa (activated) over one hour is reported., Summary: An 84-year-old woman who had undergone right total knee replacement was admitted to the hospital from a rehabilitation facility with an initial diagnosis of mental status changes and a suspected urinary tract infection. Examination of the patient's incision from her recent knee surgery revealed a discharge, and a culture was obtained. The patient was diagnosed with sepsis, intubated, and transferred to the intensive care unit. Multiple antibiotics were administered, but the patient's condition continued to deteriorate. In addition, the patient developed acute renal failure, required a ventilator, had cyanotic limbs, and had partially compensated metabolic acidosis. On hospital day 7, drotrecogin alfa (activated) was initiated. She inadvertently received an infusion of 184 microg/kg of drotrecogin alfa over 1 hour. Nine hours later, she received drotrecogin alfa 24 microg/kg/hr for 95 hours. The patient's clinical status was improved after the initial infusion. Peripheral limb cyanosis was markedly decreased, with pink, warm extremities. In addition, the patient's clinical laboratory test values improved after administration of drotrecogin alfa. However, the patient was unable to recover fully from the acute kidney failure and was discharged to hospice care., Conclusion: A drotrecogin alfa dose of 184 microg/kg i.v. was erroneously administered over 1 hour to a patient with sepsis. Nine hours later, a drotrecogin alfa infusion of 24 microg/kg/hr was started and continued for 95 hours. The patient improved clinically and had no apparent adverse events.

Background: Activated protein C reduces 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis, but its anticoagulant properties entail a risk of bleeding., Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the prevalence of serious bleeding events in patients receiving activated protein C., Methods: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for studies that described the prevalence of serious bleeding events and intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving activated protein C. We calculated the bleeding rates by calculating proportions and 95% CIs for each study, and then pooled the data to derive a pooled proportion and 95% CI., Results: Our search yielded 17 studies, which included 10,679 patients. The occurrence of serious bleeding events in patients receiving activated protein C ranged from 0.5% to 9.6%, and the pooled prevalence was 3.3% (95% CI 2.4-4.4%) by the random effects model. The occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage ranged from 0% to 1.4%, and the pooled prevalence was 0.44% (95% CI 0.31-0.6%). Sensitivity analysis showed a higher prevalence of bleeding in the observational studies than in the randomized controlled trials. There was substantial clinical and statistical heterogeneity, but no evidence of publication bias., Conclusions: Activated protein C is associated with significant risk of bleeding, so strict inclusion and exclusion criteria should be set prior to administering activated protein C.

Disorders of coagulation are common adverse drug events encountered in critically ill patients and present a serious concern for intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians. Dosing strategies for medications used in the ICU are typically developed for use in noncritically ill patients and, therefore, do not account for the altered pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties encountered in the critically ill as well as the increased potential for drug-drug interactions, given the far greater number of medications ordered. This substantially increases the risk for coagulation-related adverse reactions, such as a bleeding or prothrombotic events. Although many medications used in the ICU have the potential to cause coagulation disorders, the exact incidence will vary based on the specific medication, dose, concomitant drug therapy, ICU setting, and patient-specific comorbidities. Clinicians must strongly consider these factors when evaluating the risk/benefit ratio for a particular therapy. This review surveys recent literature documenting the risk for adverse drug reactions specific to bleeding and/or clotting with commonly used medications in the ICU.

Levels of protein C, low at birth, physiologically Increase until six months of age and achieve the adult range after puberty. Protein C deficiency may be congenital or acquired. Severe protein C deficiency is a rare autosomal recessive disorder that usually presents in neonatal period with purpura fulminans. Acquired protein C deficiency may be caused by increased consumption (e.g., asphyxia, overt DIC, severe infection without overt DIC, acute VTE) or by decreased synthesis of the active carboxylated protein (e.g. administration of vitamin K antagonists, severe hepatic synthetic disfunction). Two different formulations of protein C are available: recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) and human plasma-derived viral-inactivated protein C. It is known that in septic patients replacement therapy with rhAPC reduces mortality but is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. During the neonatal period, when a higher risk of bleeding exists, the human plasma-derived viral-inactivated protein C concentrate may represent an effective therapeutic option. In fact, its administration results effective both in severe congenital and acquired forms of protein C deficiency.

Purpose: A case of warfarin-induced skin necrosis (WISN) treated with protein C concentrate (human) is reported., Summary: A 46-year-old Caucasian woman was admitted to the hospital for a herpes viral infection complicated by neutropenic fevers of unknown origin. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were initiated, as well as enoxaparin for prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis. By hospital day 7, the patient's platelets decreased by 50%; by hospital day 8, they decreased another 50%. A test for heparin antibody was positive, and enoxaparin was stopped. Two days later, the patient developed a clot in her peripherally inserted central catheter, and warfarin and argatroban were initiated. Within 24 hours of warfarin initiation, the patient developed swelling in her feet and new lesions on her inner thigh, buttock, face, feet, fingers, and arms. She was treated with phytonadi-one and fresh frozen plasma, but these treatments failed to slow the progression of her lesions, which had turned to necrotic tissue. WISN was suspected, and warfarin therapy was discontinued after three doses. After a consultation with a hematologist, treatment with protein C concentrate (human) was initiated. Within 24 hours of treatment with this product, progression of necrosis stopped, and the patient's respiratory failure resolved. The patient underwent multiple skin grafts, and the lesions healed without extensive scarring. She experienced no adverse effects with the administration of protein C concentrate (human)., Conclusion: A patient with WISN was treated with protein C concentrate (human) with overall good results and no adverse effects.

Introduction: Purpura fulminans (PF) is a devastating complication of uncontrolled systemic inflammation, associated with high incidence of amputations, skin grafts and death. In this study, we aimed to clarify the clinical profile of pediatric patients with PF who improved with protein C (PC) treatment, explore treatment effects and safety, and to refine the prognostic significance of protein C plasma levels., Methods: In Germany, patients receiving protein C concentrate (Ceprotin, Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria) are registered. The database was used to locate all pediatric patients with PF treated with PC from 2002 to 2005 for this national, retrospective, multi-centered study., Results: Complete datasets were acquired in 94 patients, treated in 46 centers with human, non-activated protein C concentrate for purpura fulminans. PC was given for 2 days (median, range 1-24 days) with a median daily dose of 100 IU/kg. Plasma protein C levels increased from a median of 27% to a median of 71% under treatment. 22.3% of patients died, 77.7% survived to discharge. Skin grafts were required in 9.6%, amputations in 5.3%. PF recovered or improved in 79.8%, remained unchanged in 13.8% and deteriorated in 6.4%. Four adverse events occurred in 3 patients, none classified as severe. Non-survivors had lower protein C plasma levels (P < 0.05) and higher prevalence of coagulopathy at admission (P < 0.01). Time between admission and start of PC substitution was longer in patients who died compared to survivors (P = 0.03)., Conclusions: This retrospective dataset shows that, compared to historic controls, only few pediatric patients with PF under PC substitution needed dermatoplasty and/or amputations. Apart from epistaxis, no bleeding was observed. Although the data comes from a retrospective study, the evidence we present suggests that PC had a beneficial impact on the need for dermatoplasty and amputations, pointing to the potential value of carrying out a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA), or recombinant human activated protein C, represents the only Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for mortality reduction in adult patients with severe sepsis. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) has properties that address microvascular injury in severe sepsis through its direct effects on endothelial cells and leukocytes while also having antithrombotic and indirect profibrinolytic properties. Sepsis bundle and guideline implementation has been associated with improved survival and includes DrotAA administration in appropriate patients. Several DrotAA postapproval clinical studies have yielded additional outcome and safety data, better defining its benefit/risk profile. Bleeding is more common in DrotAA-treated patients; therefore, a careful assessment of bleeding risk and an understanding of the safety profile is required. This summary provides a detailed review of safety data and outcomes of patients treated with DrotAA in recent clinical studies enrolling more than 7000 adult patients.

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of extended drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DAA) therapy., Design: Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study., Setting: Sixty-four intensive care units in nine countries., Patients: Adults with severe sepsis and vasopressor-dependent hypotension after a 96-h infusion of standard DAA., Interventions: A total of 193 patients received an intravenous infusion of extended DAA 24 microg/kg/h or sodium chloride placebo for a maximum of 72 h., Measurements and Results: At extended therapy initiation (baseline), DAA-group patients had lower protein C levels (P = 0.23) and higher vasopressor requirements, particularly for the primary vasopressor used, norepinephrine (P = 0.03), compared with placebo-group patients. DAA treatment did not result in a difference in the primary outcome of time to resolution of vasopressor-dependent hypotension versus placebo (P = 0.419). However, few patients reached resolution (DAA 34%, placebo 40%) as most continued to require vasopressor support after 72 additional hours of treatment. Treatment did not reduce 28-day all-cause mortality and in-hospital mortality or improve organ function compared with placebo, although there was a lower percentage change in D-dimers (P < 0.001) and increases in protein C levels were numerically greater on extended infusion. There was no difference in serious adverse events including bleeding events., Conclusions: Extended DAA treatment did not result in more rapid resolution of vasopressor-dependent hypotension, despite demonstrating anticipated biological effects on D-dimer and protein C levels. A reduced planned sample size combined with baseline imbalances in protein C levels and vasopressor requirements may have limited the ability to demonstrate a clinical benefit.