1. Distinct patterns of biomarker expression for atypical intraductal proliferations in prostate cancer.
- Author
-
Martini C, Logan JM, Sorvina A, Prabhakaran S, Ung BSY, Johnson IRD, Hickey SM, Brooks RD, Caruso MC, Klebe S, Karageorgos L, O'Leary JJ, Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, and Brooks DA
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Aged, Middle Aged, Immunohistochemistry, Aged, 80 and over, Cell Proliferation, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating pathology, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating diagnosis, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating metabolism, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology, Prostatic Neoplasms metabolism, Prostatic Neoplasms diagnosis, Biomarkers, Tumor analysis, Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia pathology, Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia diagnosis, Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia metabolism
- Abstract
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is a well-characterised precursor lesion in prostate cancer. The term atypical intraductal proliferations (AIP) describes lesions with features that are far too atypical to be considered HGPIN, yet insufficient to be diagnosed as intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDCP). Here, a panel of biomarkers was assessed to provide insights into the biological relationship between IDCP, HGPIN, and AIP and their relevance to current clinicopathological recommendations. Tissue samples from 86 patients with prostate cancer were assessed by routine haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) with a biomarker panel (Appl1/Sortilin/Syndecan-1) and a PIN4 cocktail (34βE12+P63/P504S). Appl1 strongly labelled atypical secretory cells, effectively visualising intraductal lesions. Sortilin labelling was moderate-to-strong in > 70% of cases, while Syndecan-1 was moderate-to-strong in micropapillary HGPIN/AIP lesions (83% cases) versus flat/tufting HGPIN (≤ 20% cases). Distinct biomarker labelling patterns for atypical intraductal lesions of the prostate were observed, including early atypical changes (flat/tufting HGPIN) and more advanced atypical changes (micropapillary HGPIN/AIP). Furthermore, the biomarker panel may be used as a tool to overcome the diagnostic uncertainty surrounding AIP by supporting a definitive diagnosis of IDCP for such lesions displaying the same biomarker pattern as cribriform IDCP., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF