Search

HepB-CpG is a licensed adjuvanted two-dose hepatitis B vaccine for adults, with limited data on exposure during pregnancy. We assessed the risk of pregnancy outcomes among individuals who received HepB-CpG or the 3-dose HepB-alum vaccine ≤28 d prior to conception or during pregnancy at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). The pregnancy cohort included KPSC members aged ≥18 y who received ≥1 dose of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB-CpG or HepB-alum) at KPSC outpatient family or internal medicine departments from August 2018 to November 2020. We followed these individuals through electronic health records from the vaccination date until the end of pregnancy, KPSC health plan disenrollment, or death, whichever came first. Among 81 and 125 eligible individuals who received HepB-CpG and HepB-alum, respectively, live births occurred in 84% and 74%, spontaneous abortion occurred in 7% and 17% (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.40, 95% CI: 0.16-1.00), and preterm birth occurred in 15% and 14% of liveborn infants (aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.47-1.99). No major birth defects were identified through 6 months of age. The study found no evidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes for recipients of HepB-CpG in comparison to HepB-alum.

Purpose: Psoriasis (PsO), a chronic inflammatory skin disorder affecting a substantial proportion of populations globally, often necessitates systemic treatment including biologics. This 14-year cohort study, based on Danish national register data, aimed to investigate the enduring safety profile of ustekinumab compared to other systemic psoriasis treatments., Methods: Using comprehensive Danish national register data, this study scrutinized patients diagnosed with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who received ustekinumab. The treatment group comparators were non-biological systemic treatment (non-biologic), tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor medicine groups (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (IL-17), and IL-23 inhibitors (IL-23). The study periods for comparisons were 2009-2022 for non-biologic and TNF-α, 2015-2022 for IL-17, and 2018-2022 for IL-23. Outcomes were malignancies, cardiovascular events, serious infections, and serious hypersensitivity reactions. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to analyze two estimands: a standard intention-to-treat (ITT) estimand and a continuous-index-treatment (CIT) estimand, which considered switch and re-initiation of treatments within individuals., Results: Users of ustekinumab were found to be younger on average, with an average age of 45.1 years compared to 51.6, 47.2, 49.0, and 48.4 years in the non-biologic, TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-23 groups, respectively. Also, 57.3% of the ustekinumab users were male, compared to 46.7%, 48.9%, 50.9%, and 58.3% for the non-biologic, TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-23 groups, respectively. Although the hazard ratio estimates varied across comparators, ustekinumab was found to be safe: regardless of PsA status, no discernible safety signals in terms of malignancy, MACE, severe infections, or severe hypersensitivity reactions were observed for ustekinumab when compared to the treatment comparators., Conclusions: The present study corroborated the enduring safety of ustekinumab in the context of PsO treatment., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Inclisiran, the newest lipid-lowering drug, has not shown significant safety problems in major clinical studies. However, its recent market introduction and limited clinical use have produced few reports of adverse reactions, leaving a comprehensive understanding of its long-term safety yet to be established., Aim: The aim of the study was to conduct a signal detection analysis of adverse events (AEs) associated with inclisiran using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) datasets., Method: Data on AEs associated with inclisiran were collected from the FAERS database from 2021 to 2023. Signal detection was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC). The analysis was standardized using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and focused on System Organ Classes (SOCs) and Preferred Terms., Results: Of 17,307,196 AE reports, 2976 were relevant to inclisiran. The male-to-female ratio of these events was 0.74:1, predominantly in patients aged 45 to 74 years. A total of 102 AE signals associated with inclisiran were identified in 15 SOCs. Among these, 86 involved muscle injuries, liver injuries, diabetes, neurocognitive dysfunction, and other events not listed on the drug label., Conclusion: The findings confirm all AEs documented on the drug label and in current clinical trials while also revealing new AEs such as muscle pain, elevated liver enzymes, increased blood glucose levels, and neurocognitive dysfunction. This study contributes to real-world research data, providing valuable references for rational drug use., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Adverse events (AEs) associated with vaccination have traditionally been evaluated by epidemiological studies. More recently, they have gained attention due to the emergency use authorization of several COVID-19 vaccines. As part of its responsibility to conduct postmarket surveillance, the US Food and Drug Administration continues to monitor several AEs of interest to ensure the safety of vaccines, including those for COVID-19., Objective: This study is part of the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety Initiative, which aims to improve the US Food and Drug Administration's postmarket surveillance capabilities while minimizing the burden of collecting clinical data on suspected postvaccination AEs. The objective of this study was to enhance active surveillance efforts through a pilot platform that can receive automatically reported AE cases through a health care data exchange., Methods: We detected cases by sharing and applying computable phenotype algorithms to real-world data in health care providers' electronic health records databases. Using the fast healthcare interoperability resources standard for secure data transmission, we implemented a computable phenotype algorithm on a new health care system. The study focused on the algorithm's positive predictive value, validated through clinical records, assessing both the time required for implementation and the accuracy of AE detection., Results: The algorithm required 200-250 hours to implement and optimize. Of the 6,574,420 clinical encounters across 694,151 patients, 30 cases were identified as potential myocarditis/pericarditis. Of these, 26 cases were retrievable, and 24 underwent clinical validation. In total, 14 cases were confirmed as definite or probable myocarditis/pericarditis, yielding a positive predictive value of 58.3% (95% CI 37.3%-76.9%). These findings underscore the algorithm's capability for real-time detection of AEs, though they also highlight variability in performance across different health care systems., Conclusions: The study advocates for the ongoing refinement and application of distributed computable phenotype algorithms to enhance AE detection capabilities. These tools are crucial for comprehensive postmarket surveillance and improved vaccine safety monitoring. The outcomes suggest the need for further optimization to achieve more consistent results across diverse health care settings., (©Matthew Deady, Raymond Duncan, Matthew Sonesen, Renier Estiandan, Kelly Stimpert, Sylvia Cho, Jeffrey Beers, Brian Goodness, Lance Daniel Jones, Richard Forshee, Steven A Anderson, Hussein Ezzeldin. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 25.11.2024.)

Background: Rapid innovation and new regulations lead to an increased need for post-marketing surveillance of implantable devices. However, complex multi-level confounding related not only to patient-level but also to surgeon or hospital covariates hampers observational studies of risks and benefits. We conducted parametric and plasmode simulations to compare the performance of cardinality matching (CM) vs propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce confounding bias in the presence of cluster-level confounding., Methods: Two Monte Carlo simulation studies were carried out: 1) Parametric simulations (1,000 iterations) with patients nested in clusters (ratio 10:1, 50:1, 100:1, 200:1, 500:1) and sample size n = 10,000 were conducted with patient and cluster level confounders; 2) Plasmode simulations generated from a cohort of 9981 patients admitted for pancreatectomy between 2015 to 2019 from a US hospital database. CM with 0.1 standardised mean different constraint threshold (SMD) for confounders and PSM were used to balance the confounders for within-cluster and cross-cluster matching. Treatment effects were then estimated using logistic regression as the outcome model on the obtained matched sample., Results: CM yielded higher sample retention but more bias than PSM for cross-cluster matching in most scenarios. For instance, with ratio of 100:1, sample retention and relative bias were 97.1% and 26.5% for CM, compared to 82.5% and 12.2% for PSM. The results for plasmode simulation were similar., Conclusions: CM offered better sample retention but higher bias in most scenarios compared to PSM. More research is needed to guide the use of CM particularly in constraint setting for confounders for medical device and surgical epidemiology., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: DPA’s department has received grant/s from Amgen, Chiesi-Taylor, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB Biopharma. His research group has received consultancy fees from Astra Zeneca and UCB Biopharma. Amgen, Astellas, Janssen, Synapse Management Partners and UCB Biopharma have funded or supported training programmes organised by DPA's department. SP and PMC are employees of Johnson & Johnson Medical Device Companies and Office of the Chief Medical Officer. VS are employee at Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the proportion of cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) associated with the utilization of memantine and cholinesterase inhibitors and to highlight the potential impact of sex differences in these AEs., Methods: Cardiac and vascular disorders AEs with antidementia medications were obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. The reporting odds ratio and its corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The chi-squared test was used to evaluate differences in categorical variables, and a two-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni post-test was used to compare the AEs reported for antidementia medications., Results: Memantine was associated with 544 selected cardiac and vascular disorder AEs. A signal for bradycardia, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation and cardiac arrest has been observed in patients receiving choline esterase inhibitors compared to those receiving memantine. On the other hand, cardiac failure and deep vein thrombosis AEs were found to be more common in patients receiving memantine. The majority of reported cardiac and vascular AEs were reported more frequently in female patients. More cases of cardiac failure, cardiac arrest, and deep vein thrombosis were reported in females than males taking memantine, but bradycardia was more common in males than females., Conclusion: Healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential for cardiovascular AEs during treatment with antidementia medications and the possibility of sex differences in this regard. Memantine differs from cholinesterase inhibitors in terms of cardiovascular AEs, and there may be sex-related differences in the proportion of these AEs., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for multiple coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) drugs as a medical countermeasure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite these drugs' fast-track nature, concerns persist regarding their efficacy and potential adverse effects. Thus, the continuous surveillance and understanding of these drugs' safety profiles are crucial in such scenarios., Objective: Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we aimed to compare the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of four fast-track COVID-19 drugs to explore the potential of real-world data for providing prompt feedback in clinical settings., Methods: To evaluate the post-marketing safety of fast-track COVID-19 drugs, we descriptively evaluated the ADRs of four COVID-19 drugs (bebtelovimab, molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and remdesivir) using FAERS data reported from January 2020 to June 2022. We examined FAERS case records of COVID-19 drugs reported as the "primary suspect drug" as a case group and the records of other drugs as the control. "Serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs)" were defined based on FDA guidelines. Using reporting odds ratios, disproportionality analysis was conducted to determine significant signals for ADRs related to each of the four drugs compared with those of others, both at the preferred term (PT) and system organ class (SOC) levels. To explore the occurrence of reporting each serious outcome reported to the four drugs, we fitted logistic regression models, adjusting for age and sex., Results: During the study period, 5 248 221 cases were submitted to FAERS, including 17 275 cases of the four COVID-19 drugs: bebtelovimab (532 cases), molnupiravir (1106 cases), nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (9217 cases), and remdesivir (6420 cases). A total of 64, 46, 116, and 207 PTs with significant disproportionality were identified for each drug, respectively. "Infusion-related reaction" (18.4%), "diarrhea" (7.4%), "dysgeusia" (11.4%), and "increased alanine aminotransferase" (14.5%) were the most frequently reported SADRs for bebtelovimab, molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and remdesivir, respectively. Among the 27 SOCs, statistically significant signals were observed in 10, 3, 0, and 8 SOCs for bebtelovimab, molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and remdesivir, respectively. Remdesivir showed a higher occurrence for the reporting of death or life-threatening ADRs compared with the control (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.23-2.59; adjusted OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.64-2.02, respectively)., Conclusions: We identified potential ADRs associated with COVID-19 drugs and provided insights into their real-world safety. This study demonstrated that real-world data and real-time safety reviews could be effective methods for the timely detection of ADR signals of drugs that have received fast-track approval, as exemplified by COVID-19 drugs. These findings underscore the importance of the continued surveillance, efficient data processing, and establishment of automated pipelines for real-time safety reviews., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are pivotal in treating various diseases, including cancers and autoimmune disorders. Despite their therapeutic benefits, mAb therapy has been associated with neurological toxicity., Objectives: This study aimed to assess the occurrence of neuronal toxicity associated with mAbs, utilizing data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) safety database. The study also sought to delineate the medical characteristics of the reported cases., Methods: A comprehensive analysis of neurological adverse events reported in the FAERS database was conducted, employing computational methodologies such as proportional relative risk (PRR), information component (IC 025 ), and chi-square (χ 2 ). Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) pertaining to neurological disorders linked to mAbs from the date of first global marketing authorization until June 30, 2023, were meticulously examined., Results: The FAERS safety database contains 79,022 ICSRs linking mAbs to nervous system disorders. Rituximab, bevacizumab, denosumab, nivolumab, and trastuzumab were frequently cited. Reported adverse events include headache, peripheral neuropathy, dizziness, and cerebrovascular accident. Most ICSRs (85.81%) were serious, mainly affecting females (57.04%) with a 14.09% fatality rate. Panitumumab, atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and trastuzumab showed strong drug-event associations. Signal disproportionate reporting (SDR) analysis flagged myasthenia gravis, peripheral neuropathy, and neurotoxicity across multiple mAbs, suggesting potential signals., Conclusions: Interdisciplinary collaboration between oncologists and neurologists is crucial for safe mAb use. Our study enhances understanding of mAb neurological safety. Disproportionality signal analysis provides valuable evidence for risk mitigation., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been warning about the psychiatric disorders associated with montelukast (MTK) for years. To study the characteristics of the presence of MTK-associated adverse events (AEs), we obtained data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database and used a case (MTK) vs. non-case (all other drugs) analysis to investigate the safety signals in a disproportionality study. 27,507 reported AEs from January 2004 to December 2022 were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis shows that psychiatric, respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders as well as social circumstances are the most commonly reported AEs. In addition, our study found several unreported AEs, such as increased systolic blood pressure, diastolic dysfunction, hypothyroidism, obesity, bursitis, and polycystic ovaries. The timing of AE occurrence indicates that MTK-associated AEs are mainly acute effects. Most importantly, we found that 60.1% of patients reporting AEs in the category of psychiatric disorders were younger than 18 years. In summary, we revealed an age-preference pattern of psychiatric AEs in patients prescribed MTK. Our study is helpful for physicians and health professionals to better evaluate the value and risk of MTK and to achieve the goal of optimal patient care.

Purpose: This study aimed to comprehensively assess the safety of rimegepant administration in real-world clinical settings., Methods: Data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) spanning the second quarter of 2020 through the first quarter of 2023 were retrospectively analyzed in this pharmacovigilance investigation. This study focuses on employing subgroup analysis to monitor rimegepant drug safety. Descriptive analysis was employed to examine clinical characteristics and concomitant medication of adverse event reports associated with rimegepant, including report season, reporter country, sex, age, weight, dose, and frequency, onset time, et al. Correlation analysis, including techniques such as violin plots, was utilized to explore relationships between clinical characteristics in greater detail. Additionally, four disproportionality analysis methods were applied to assess adverse event signals associated with rimegepant., Results: A total of 5,416,969 adverse event reports extracted from the FAERS database, 10, 194 adverse events were identified as the "primary suspect" (PS) drug attributed to rimegepant. Rimegepant-associated adverse events involved 27 System Organ Classes (SOCs), and the significant SOC meeting all four detection criteria was "general disorders and administration site conditions" (SOC: 10018065). Additionally, new significant adverse events were discovered, including "vomiting projectile" (PT: 10047708), "eructation" (PT: 10015137), "motion sickness" (PT: 10027990), "feeling drunk" (PT: 10016330), "reaction to food additive" (PT: 10037977), etc. Descriptive analysis indicated that the majority of reporters were consumers (88.1%), with most reports involving female patients. Significant differences were observed between female and male patients across age categories, and the concomitant use of rimegepant with other medications was complex., Conclusion: This study has preliminarily identified potential new adverse events associated with rimegepant, such as those involving the gastrointestinal system, nervous system, and immune system, which warrant further research to determine their exact mechanisms and risk factors. Additionally, significant differences in rimegepant-related adverse events were observed across different age groups and sexes, and the complexity of concomitant medication use should be given special attention in clinical practice., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim/introduction: The recent adverse reactions associated with semaglutide have led the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to issue a "black box warning", and it is necessary to analyze all reports of adverse reactions to improve the safety of its clinical use., Materials and Methods: Statistical analyses and signal mining were performed by obtaining the adverse event reports related to semaglutide in the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2018 to the fourth quarter of 2023. We used disproportionality and Bayesian analysis to examine clinical and demographic attributes, trends reported quarterly, and contrasts between two distinct indications (obesity and type 2 diabetes)., Results: We found 10 unexpected adverse signals related to "pancreatic cancer", "intestinal obstruction", "cholecystitis", and "polycystic ovary" and both the two different indications had the same serious adverse reaction events occurring., Conclusions: This study identified many unexpected signals of serious adverse reactions, suggesting the importance of continuous post-marketing surveillance of semaglutide to understand its potential risks., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Study Objectives: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) has been widely used to treat obstructive sleep apnea in selected patients. Here we evaluate rates of revision and explant related to HGNS implantation and assess types of adverse events contributing to revision and explant., Methods: Postmarket surveillance data for HGNS implanted between January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2022, were collected. Event rates and risk were calculated using the postmarket surveillance event counts and sales volume over the same period. Indications were categorized for analysis. Descriptive statistics were reported and freedom from explant or revision curves were grouped by year of implantation., Results: Of the 20,881 HGNS implants assessed, rates of explant and revision within the first year were 0.723% and 1.542%, respectively. The most common indication for explant was infection (0.378%) and for revision was surgical correction (0.680%). Of the 5,820 devices with 3-year postimplantation data, the rate of explant was 2.680% and of revision was 3.557%. During this same interval, elective removal (1.478%) was the most common indication, and for revisions, surgical correction (1.134%)., Conclusions: The efficacy of HGNS is comparable in the real world setting to published clinical trial data. Rates of explant and revision are low, supporting a satisfactory safety profile for this technology., Citation: Moroco AE, Wei Z, Byrd I, et al. Device-related outcomes following hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation. J Clin Sleep Med . 2024;20(9):1497-1503., (© 2024 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.)

Purpose: Valbenazine is commonly used to treat tardive dyskinesia, and we conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to evaluate neurological safety signals associated with valbenazine., Methods: Data was collected in FAERS from the second quarter of 2017 to the fourth quarter of 2023 for data cleaning. Neurological adverse event (AE) signals of valbenazine were mined by calculating reporting odds ratios (ROR), information component (IC) and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM). The serious and non-serious cases and signals were prioritized using a rating scale., Results: The number of neurological AE reports where the primary suspect (PS) drug was 8981 for valbenazine. Significant AE signals were identified by the preferred term (PT) analysis for valbenazine, including somnolence (ROR 19.69), tremor (ROR 15.17), and tardive dyskinesia (ROR 236.91), among which 18 AEs were identified as new signals. Patient age (p < 0.009) and sex (p = 0.197) might be associated with an increased risk of neurological AE severity. Notably, the association between valbenazine and neurological disorders remained when stratified by sex, age, and reporter type. AE timing analysis was performed for the drug and four moderate clinical priority signals [i.e., somnolence, balance disorder, parkinsonism, and akathisia (priorities 7)], showing the same early failure type profiles., Conclusions: The increase in neurological safety signals is identified in the post-marketing research of valbenazine. Clinicians need to pay attention to not only common AEs but also be alert to new neurological AE signals when using valbenazine., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting (SAER) databases play a crucial role in post-marketing drug surveillance. However, the traditional model-free disproportionality analysis has been challenged by the insufficiency in investigating subgroup and confounders. These issues result in significant low-precision and biases in data mining for SAER., Methods: The Model-Driven Reporting Odds Ratio (MD-ROR) was proposed to bridge the gap between SAER database and explainable models for exploring individual and confounding effects. MD-ROR is grounded in a well-designed model, rather than a 2 × 2 cross table, for estimating AE-drug signals. Consequently, individual and confounding effects can be parameterized based on these models. We employed simulation data and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database., Result: The simulated data indicated the subgroup effects estimated by MD-ROR were unbiased and efficient. Moreover, the adjusted-MD-ROR demonstrated greater robustness against confounding biases than the crude ROR. Applying our method to the FAERS database suggested higher occurrences of drug interactions and cardiac adverse events induced by Midazolam in females compared to males., Conclusion: The study underscored that MD-ROR holds promise as a method for investigating individual and confounding effects in SAER databases.

Real world healthcare data are commonly used in post-market safety monitoring studies to address potential safety issues related to newly approved medical products. Such studies typically involve repeated evaluations of accumulating safety data with respect to pre-defined hypotheses, for which the group sequential design provides a rigorous and flexible statistical framework. A major challenge in designing a group sequential safety monitoring study is the uncertainty associated with product uptake, which makes it difficult to specify the final sample size or maximum duration of the study. To deal with this challenge, we propose an information-based group sequential design which specifies a target amount of information that would produce adequate power for detecting a clinically significant effect size. At each interim analysis, the variance estimate for the treatment effect of interest is used to compute the current information time, and a pre-specified alpha spending function is used to determine the stopping boundary. The proposed design can be applied to regression models that adjust for potential confounders and/or heterogeneous treatment exposure. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed design performs reasonably well in realistic settings., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Clinical trials supporting oncology drug approvals frequently underrepresent diverse racial and ethnic populations. Recent policies have focused on ensuring premarket clinical trials are more inclusive and representative of racial and ethnic diversity in the general U.S. population or intended patient population; however, recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance on postmarketing approaches to collecting data in underrepresented populations demonstrates that, in certain circumstances, postmarketing requirements and/or commitments (PMR/Cs) may be issued to conduct more representative studies if there are remaining questions about safety or efficacy. This analysis demonstrates that prior to 2020, no drugs had PMR/Cs to further characterize use in a more representative population, and in the last 3 years, more than half of novel oncology approvals have had such a PMR/C (21/40, 53%). In addition, this analysis helps to identify characteristics, such as single-arm pivotal trial design, U.S. enrollment, and results of safety subgroup analyses based on race and ethnicity, that may contribute to decisions to issue a PMR/C to conduct a study that is more representative of the racial and ethnic diversity of the U.S. or intended patient population. These results can inform efforts to improve premarket clinical trials to ensure they are representative and able to characterize use in any patient who may need the drug., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: With the continuous increasing availability of new filler products, each hyaluronic acid filler brand has distinctive pharmacokinetics, which may be associated with different complications. Therefore, the long-term safety of new generations of fillers should be evaluated., Objective: This prospective, multicenter, observational, postmarketing study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04738019) aimed to investigate the incidence of delayed-onset nodules and adverse reactions after the injection of new hyaluronic acid fillers (YYS series) into the facial skin., Methods: Subjects scheduled to receive an injection YYS series filler were followed up for 52 weeks. The authors aimed to determine the incidence of a self-reported delayed-onset nodule-a visible or palpable nodule or mass at the injection site that was detected beyond the 14th day following the injection-during the 1-year follow-up period., Results: Among the 1,022 subjects who received an injection of the YYS series, the incidences of delayed-onset nodules were 0% for YYS 360, YYS 540, and YYS 720. A 0.21% incidence (1 delayed hypersensitivity reaction) of a delayed-onset adverse reaction was noted for YYS 720, although none were reported for YYS 360 and YYS 540., Conclusion: In this study, a notably low frequency of adverse reactions associated with the YYS series was observed., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc.)

Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) awards the breakthrough therapy designation to expedite development and review of therapeutics intended to treat serious conditions when preliminary clinical evidence demonstrates potential substantial improvement over existing therapies on clinically significant end points. Under the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016, the FDA is required to publish and routinely update a list of surrogate markers to provide industry sponsors with indication-specific information about end points that were or may be considered for approval. Therapeutics that are granted breakthrough therapy designation can receive accelerated or traditional approval; however, little is known about those approved through the latter pathway, where postmarketing confirmatory studies are typically not required, regardless of the end point used., Objective: To evaluate the primary end points used in premarket pivotal trials supporting FDA breakthrough therapy-designated approvals and to determine whether postmarketing studies confirming efficacy were required for approvals based on pivotal trials using surrogate markers as primary end points., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the Drugs@FDA database for all original breakthrough therapy-designated approvals from inception to December 31, 2023, in the US. The first designation was approved on November 1, 2013. Data analysis was performed in January 2024., Main Outcomes and Measures: Descriptive analyses were used to characterize the breakthrough therapy-designated indication approval pathways, the primary end points of pivotal efficacy trials, and their postmarketing requirements or commitments., Results: From 2013 to 2023, the FDA approved 157 original indications with breakthrough therapy designation. Of these, 52 (33%) were granted accelerated approval and 105 (67%) were granted traditional approval. All accelerated approvals were based on pivotal trials using surrogate markers as primary end points and had FDA-required postmarketing studies to confirm efficacy. Of these 52 indications, 51 (98%) were approved based on surrogate end points listed in the FDA table of surrogate end points for the same indication. Among traditional approvals, 61 (58%) were based on pivotal trials using surrogate markers as primary end points, of which 4 (7%) had FDA-required postmarketing studies to confirm efficacy and 39 (64%) were approved based on surrogate end points listed in the FDA table for the same indication., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of original FDA breakthrough therapy-designated approvals from 2013 to 2023, trials supporting these approvals often used surrogate markers as primary end points (even when not approved via accelerated approval) and lacked FDA-required postmarketing studies to verify clinical benefit. These findings suggest that requiring postmarketing studies for breakthrough therapy-designated indications approved based on surrogate markers, regardless of approval pathway, may increase patient and clinician certainty of the expected clinical benefit.

Aims: Avapritinib was first approved by the FDA in January 2020 and represents the first precision-targeted drug for gastrointestinal stromal tumours. However, there is a lack of large-scale data relating to adverse events (AEs) related to its use. We aimed to explore the avapritinib-related AEs in real-world practice based on the post-marketing data., Methods: We extracted all avapritinib-related reports submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) by June 2022. Based on disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis, we then calculated the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), information component (IC) and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) to evaluate whether there is a significant association between avapritinib and AEs. Gender, age and time to onset were comparable between haemorrhage/non-haemorrhage, serious/non-serious, death/non-death AEs, respectively., Results: In total, 3120 cases related to avapritinib were documented in the FAERS database, and 44% were reported within 30 days of commencing avapritinib. A total of 331 different AE signals were detected, and no significant differences between males and females was identified. Although the number of AEs associated with an abnormal skin texture and executive dysfunction was small, the signal intensity is high, suggesting that these events are strongly correlated with avapritinib. Subgroup analysis showed that elderly male patients were more likely to suffer from serious AEs compared to females (P < .01), but there was no significant difference between the haemorrhage group and the non-haemorrhage group. Analysis of fatalities due to avapritinib-related AEs indicated that sex, age and time-to-onset were all significantly related to death (P < .05)., Conclusion: Our study provides a more precise description of the incidence and characteristics of AEs after using avapritinib, clinicians should be particularly careful when prescribing avapritinib to elderly male patients, especially within the 30 days., (© 2023 British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Adverse events associated with vaccination have been evaluated by epidemiological studies and more recently have gained additional attention with the emergency use authorization of several COVID-19 vaccines. As part of its responsibility to conduct postmarket surveillance, the US Food and Drug Administration continues to monitor several adverse events of special interest (AESIs) to ensure vaccine safety, including for COVID-19., Objective: This study is part of the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety Initiative, which aims to improve the Food and Drug Administration's postmarket surveillance capabilities while minimizing public burden. This study aimed to enhance active surveillance efforts through a rules-based, computable phenotype algorithm to identify 5 AESIs being monitored by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention for COVID-19 or other vaccines: anaphylaxis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, myocarditis/pericarditis, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, and febrile seizure. This study examined whether these phenotypes have sufficiently high positive predictive value (PPV) to ensure that the cases selected for surveillance are reasonably likely to be a postbiologic adverse event. This allows patient privacy, and security concerns for the data sharing of patients who had nonadverse events can be properly accounted for when evaluating the cost-benefit aspect of our approach., Methods: AESI phenotype algorithms were developed to apply to electronic health record data at health provider organizations across the country by querying for standard and interoperable codes. The codes queried in the rules represent symptoms, diagnoses, or treatments of the AESI sourced from published case definitions and input from clinicians. To validate the performance of the algorithms, we applied them to electronic health record data from a US academic health system and provided a sample of cases for clinicians to evaluate. Performance was assessed using PPV., Results: With a PPV of 93.3%, our anaphylaxis algorithm performed the best. The PPVs for our febrile seizure, myocarditis/pericarditis, thrombocytopenia syndrome, and Guillain-Barré syndrome algorithms were 89%, 83.5%, 70.2%, and 47.2%, respectively., Conclusions: Given our algorithm design and performance, our results support continued research into using interoperable algorithms for widespread AESI postmarket detection., (©Ashley A Holdefer, Jeno Pizarro, Patrick Saunders-Hastings, Jeffrey Beers, Arianna Sang, Aaron Zachary Hettinger, Joseph Blumenthal, Erik Martinez, Lance Daniel Jones, Matthew Deady, Hussein Ezzeldin, Steven A Anderson. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 15.07.2024.)

Introduction: This study is part of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST) initiative, which aims to improve the FDA's postmarket surveillance capabilities by using real-world data (RWD). In the United States, using RWD for postmarket surveillance has been hindered by the inability to exchange clinical data between healthcare providers and public health organizations in an interoperable format. However, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) has recently enacted regulation requiring all healthcare providers to support seamless access, exchange, and use of electronic health information through the interoperable HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard. To leverage the recent ONC changes, BEST designed a pilot platform to query and receive the clinical information necessary to analyze suspected AEs. This study assessed the feasibility of using the RWD received through the data exchange of FHIR resources to study post-vaccination AE cases by evaluating the data volume, query response time, and data quality., Materials and Methods: The study used RWD from 283 post-vaccination AE cases, which were received through the platform. We used descriptive statistics to report results and apply 322 data quality tests based on a data quality framework for EHR., Results: The volume analysis indicated the average clinical resources for a post-vaccination AE case was 983.9 for the median partner. The query response time analysis indicated that cases could be received by the platform at a median of 3 min and 30 s. The quality analysis indicated that most of the data elements and conformance requirements useful for postmarket surveillance were met., Discussion: This study describes the platform's data volume, data query response time, and data quality results from the queried postvaccination adverse event cases and identified updates to current standards to close data quality gaps., Competing Interests: LJ, BG, AS, AP, and MD were employed by IBM while participating in the study. RD was employed by Cedars-Sinai Health System. These authors have delivered clinical and epidemiology consulting engagement for public and private sector partners. These affiliations did not impact the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript, and do not alter our adherence to Frontiers in Public Health policies on sharing data and materials. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Deady, Duncan, Jones, Sang, Goodness, Pandey, Cho, Forshee, Anderson and Ezzeldin.)

Background: After approval of Sientra silicone gel breast implants in March of 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration required completion of a 10-year U.S. postapproval study. The authors present results from the first 6 years of this study., Methods: An ongoing, open-label, prospective, multicenter study is being conducted to evaluate the long-term clinical performance of Sientra implants in patients undergoing breast augmentation, reconstruction, and revision in the postmarket environment. Enrollment of 5197 patients (10,327 implants) was completed on March 6, 2015 (4046 primary augmentation, 895 revision-augmentation, 149 primary reconstruction, and 107 revision-reconstruction). Analyses were conducted at year 6 (database lock: January 24, 2022)., Results: Across all cohorts who received an implant, the Kaplan-Meier risk of investigator-reported Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture was 4.1% (3.9% with submuscular placement and 6.75%with subglandular placement), the risk of reoperation was 11.6%, and the risk of implant removal was 7.8% (5.9% with implant replacement and 2.0% without replacement). The primary reason (>50%) for reoperation was aesthetic (eg, style/size change). The Kaplan-Meier risk of rupture, calculated for patients who underwent explantation or MRI for rupture evaluation, was 5.8%. Overall, 82.6% of patients were highly satisfied/happy with their implant. No cases of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma were reported., Conclusion: Six-year results of the postapproval study were consistent with the 10-year core study and provide additional evidence in a large data set supporting the comprehensive safety and effectiveness profile of the Sientra implants., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Objective: We report on the 1-year outcomes of fetuses who underwent thoracoamniotic shunting (TAS) with a double-basket catheter for fetal hydrothorax (FHT) using a national post-marketing surveillance registry., Methods: This surveillance study was conducted for cases enrolled between 2011 and 2019. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative findings and outcomes had to be reported through the national surveillance website., Results: Forty-three institutes enrolled 295 patients. In 60 patients, associated abnormalities were diagnosed after birth. Among the 235 patients with isolated hydrothorax, the survival rate at 1 year of age was 70.5%. Among these patients, 89% did not require oxygen or other respiratory support. The 1-year survival rate in complicated cases was 27%. Trisomy 21 was the most common associated problem (40%). Catheter associated problems, including dislocation (25%), obstruction (24%), and preterm rupture of the membranes (6%) were observed, but there were no severe maternal complications. TAS before 29.5 weeks of gestation (odds ratio [OR] 0.16) and skin edema and ascites (OR 0.06) were risk factors for death at one year, whereas appropriate shunt location for >28 days (OR 4.2) was a protective factor., Conclusion: We report a favorable survival rate in fetuses with isolated FHT treated with this double-basket catheter., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Streaming data routinely generated by social networks, mobile or web applications, e-commerce, and electronic health records present new opportunities to monitor the impact of an intervention on an outcome via causal inference methods. However, most existing causal inference methods have been focused on and applied to static data, that is, a fixed data set in which observations are pooled and stored before performing statistical analysis. There is thus a pressing need to turn static causal inference into online causal learning to support near real-time monitoring of treatment effects. In this paper, we present a framework for online estimation and inference of treatment effects that can incorporate new information as it becomes available without revisiting prior observations. We show that, under mild regularity conditions, the proposed online estimator is asymptotically equivalent to the offline oracle estimator obtained by pooling all data. Our proposal is motivated by the need for near real-time vaccine effectiveness and safety monitoring, and our proposed method is applied to a case study on COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate the potential risk of acute pancreatitis with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) newly initiating empagliflozin., Methods: Data from two large US claims databases were analyzed in an observational study of patients with T2D receiving metformin who were newly prescribed empagliflozin versus sulfonylurea (SU). Because dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have been associated with the risk of acute pancreatitis in some studies, patients on these agents were excluded. Using pooled analyses of data from the two databases (2014-2021), patients initiating empagliflozin were matched 1:1 within database to patients initiating SU using propensity scores (PS) that incorporated relevant demographic and clinical characteristics. Prespecified sensitivity analyses were performed for design parameters., Results: The analyses identified 72 661 new users of empagliflozin and 422 018 new users of SUs, with both patient groups on concurrent metformin therapy. Baseline characteristics within treatment groups appeared to be similar across the 72 621 matched pairs. After mean follow-up of ~6 months, incidence rates of acute pancreatitis in the pooled matched cohort were 10.30 (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.29-11.39) events per 1000 patient-years (PY) for empagliflozin and 11.65 (95% CI 10.59-12.77) events per 1000 PY for SUs. On a background of metformin, patients newly initiating empagliflozin did not have an increased risk of acute pancreatitis compared with those initiating an SU (pooled PS matched hazard ratio 0.88 [0.76-1.02]) across 75621.42 PY of follow-up., Conclusions: The results of this voluntary post-approval safety study provide additional evidence that the use of empagliflozin for the treatment of T2D is not associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis., (© 2024 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Drug safety communications (DSCs) are essential tools for communicating important postmarket serious drug safety information to healthcare professionals and patients. Previous studies characterized DSCs issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA); however, knowledge about the activities of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)/the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) is limited. This study characterized DSCs by the PMDA/MHLW in comparison with previously reported DSCs by the FDA and the EMA. We retrospectively analyzed 37 DSCs of 41 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for 33 drugs in Japan from 1997 to 2022. Most DSCs were related to non-oncology drugs (30/37, 81.1%), and the median (interquartile range) time from approval to DSC issuance was 19 (10-51) months. Notably, the regulatory review reports and the latest labels before DSC issuance did not describe 16/28 (57.1%) and 12/37 (32.4%) of the ADRs related to DSCs, respectively. Most DSCs resulted in label revisions (36/37, 97.3%) and seven drugs were eventually withdrawn. Some DSC characteristics are similar among the PMDA/MHLW, the FDA, and the EMA; however, the number, contents, and range of new safety issues addressed by DSCs differ among the three jurisdictions. Our study emphasized the importance of continuous efforts to gather postmarket drug safety information because substantial ADRs that led to DSCs were recognized after approval and were associated with critical label revisions and withdrawals. Future studies are required to address global challenges for regulatory harmonization of safety-related regulatory actions., (© 2024 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Aim: This post-marketing surveillance study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of lenvatinib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea. Materials & methods: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and other safety and effectiveness end points were assessed in patients who initiated lenvatinib according to the approved label in republic of Korea. Results: Among 658 lenvatinib-treated patients, ADRs were reported in 57.8%; ADRs grade ≥3 in 13.5%. The most common grade ≥3 ADRs were asthenia (1.2%) and hepatic encephalopathy (1.2%). Physician-reported tumor responses (n = 511) were complete (1.0%) or partial (12.9%) response and stable (45.2%) or progressive disease (40.9%); objective response rates were higher with longer lenvatinib treatment duration ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion: Lenvatinib was generally well tolerated and effective in real-world clinical practice in Korea. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05225207.

Objective: This study aimed to improve the post-marketing surveillance on mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, characterizing the adverse events (AEs) after the first dose of mRNA BNT162b vaccine. The associations between the AEs and individuals' characteristics were explored., Patients and Methods: All adult healthcare workers at Niguarda Hospital (Milan, Italy) who were referred for the first dose of vaccine were offered to participate in a cross-sectional survey during the second-dose administration, between 18 January and 7 February 2021. All participants completed a questionnaire about age, gender, weight, height, medical history, concurrent therapies, employment status, previous diagnosis/testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection, and a list of 24 AEs (solicited AEs). The development of at least one solicited AEs was the main outcome. AEs were stratified by the presence of injection-site symptoms, systemic symptoms or both, and the differences between strata were assessed as a secondary outcome. Biometric data and reports of a previous diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection were also explored, as predictors of the main outcome., Results: 7,014 healthcare workers were included. An incidence of 3 per 10.000 persons for serious AEs following the first administration of the mRNA BNT162b vaccine was found. An association between the development of non-serious AEs with young age, female gender, low body mass index, and previous history of SARS-CoV-2 was described., Conclusions: This real-life study supported data on the safety profile of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Our findings on the associations between the development of non-serious AEs with some individual characteristics may help physicians and patients make educated and informed medical decisions towards anti-COVID-19 vaccination.

Objective: To assess the risk of hypertension in patients with migraine who received erenumab in clinical trials and in the postmarketing setting., Background: Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody for migraine prevention that targets the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor. Hypertension is a theoretical risk for inhibitors of the CGRP pathway. Although no evidence of an association between erenumab treatment and hypertension was observed during the clinical development program, adverse events (AEs) of hypertension have been identified in the postmarketing setting., Methods: Safety data from four phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials were used to perform a pooled analysis of hypertension AEs in patients with migraine receiving erenumab. Postmarketing AEs of hypertension were identified from the Amgen Global Safety database from May 17, 2018, through January 31, 2020., Results: In the pooled analysis of clinical trials, hypertension AEs (placebo, 9/1043 [0.9%]; erenumab 70 mg, 7/893 [0.8%]; erenumab 140 mg, 1/507 [0.2%]) and percentage of patients initiating medication to treat hypertension (12/1043 [1.2%], 7/893 [0.8%], 1/507 [0.2%], respectively) were similar across treatment groups. A total of 362 AEs of hypertension were identified from the postmarketing setting, 26.2% (95/362) of which were serious, >245,000 patient-years of exposure. The exposure-adjusted incidence of hypertension was 0.144 per 100 patient-years., Conclusions: Clinical trials did not demonstrate an increased risk of hypertension with erenumab compared with placebo, and AE rates of hypertension reported with erenumab in the postmarketing setting were generally low. Additional data are needed to fully characterize the extent to which hypertension is a risk associated with erenumab., (© 2021 The Authors. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Headache Society.)

Introduction: Drug use is inherently related to both beneficial effects on health as well as the occurrence of risks. The beneficial effects may be related to efficacy, the treatment range of a product, or even to user-friendliness of a product. However, in addition to the occurrence of adverse drug reactions, a drug can also have an unexpected beneficial effect on a patient's health, not related to the indication for which the drug was used. The aim of this article is to characterize the reports of unexpected beneficial effects of drugs in the Dutch spontaneous reporting system., Methods: A descriptive analysis was used to gain insight in number of reports and drug classes responsible for unexpected beneficial effects of drugs. Grouping of positive side effects into classes was done by a conventional qualitative content analysis of the cases., Results: Four hundred nine reports which described unexpected beneficial effects of drugs were included, which mentioned 451 associations between suspected drugs and unexpected beneficial effects. There were 147 drug classes on the 4th ATC level involved. Content analysis of the reports gave rise to 22 categories of unexpected beneficial effects of drugs, including one "other category". DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The analysis showed a diverse spectrum of reported reactions and drugs with some categories of unexpected beneficial effects of drugs mentioned multiple times for certain drug classes on the 4th ATC level. Most of these findings are consistent with the existing literature and knowledge on the pharmacological mechanism of the drugs in question. Coding harmonization would make it possible to study these effects in international databases., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Importance: In the US, most postmarket medical device safety data are obtained through adverse event reports that are submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. Adverse event reports are classified by the reporter as injury, malfunction, death, or other. If the device may have caused or contributed to a death, or if the cause of death is unknown, the FDA requires that the adverse event be reported as a death., Objective: To determine the percentage of medical device adverse event reports submitted to the MAUDE database that were not classified as death even though the patient died., Design, Setting, and Participants: In this study, a natural language processing algorithm was applied to the MAUDE database, followed by manual text review, to identify reports in the injury, malfunction, other or missing categories that included at least 1 term that suggested a patient death, such as patient died or patient expired, from December 31, 1991, to April 30, 2020, for any medical device., Exposures: Manual review of a random sample of 1000 adverse event reports not classified as death and of selected reports for 62 terms that are associated with deaths but were not classified as death., Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentage of adverse event reports in which the patient was said to have died in the narrative section of the report but the reporter classified the report in a category other than death., Results: The terms in the natural language processing algorithm identified 290 141 reports in which a serious injury or death was reported. Of these, 151 145 (52.1%) were classified by the reporter as death and 47.9% were classified as malfunction, injury, other, or missing. For the overall sample, the percentage of reports with deaths that were not classified as deaths was 23% (95% CI, 20%-25%), suggesting that approximately 31 552 reports in our sample had deaths that were classified in other categories. The overall percentage of missed deaths, defined as the percentage of deaths that were classified in other categories, was 17% (95% CI, 16%-19%)., Conclusions and Relevance: Many of the findings of this study suggest that many medical device adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database that involved a patient death are classified in categories other than death. As the FDA only routinely reviews all adverse events that are reported as patient deaths, improving the accuracy of adverse event reporting may enhance patient safety.

The International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E14 guidance provides recommendations to assess the potential of a drug to delay cardiac repolarization (QT prolongation), including general guidelines for cases in which a conventional thorough QT study (TQT) might not be feasible. These guidelines have been updated through the ICH question-and-answer process, with the last revision in 2015. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of QT prolongation evaluation of small-molecule new drug applications (NDAs) approved in oncology between 2011 and 2019 to extract learning experience. The following information was analysed: (1) methods to assess QT prolongation, (2) electrocardiogram data collection, (3) QT-related label language, and (4) postmarketing requirements. Overall, every NDA included a QT assessment. The concentration-QTc modeling approach (studies in which QT was not the primary objective) was the most common approach (59%), followed by the TQT and the dedicated QT studies (20% and 21%, respectively). The quality and quantity of the QT assessments were different across NDAs, which suggested relatively large flexibility in the designs and approaches to characterizing QT liability. The QT-related label language reflected the QT results, but also the safety events and the study design limitations because of the oncology settings. There was no delay in approval because of less robust QTc studies as long as the benefit-to-risk ratio of the drug was acceptable, and the implications were reflected in the label. This work offers a structured understanding of the QT evaluation criteria by the Food and Drug Administration and can assist in planning QT prolongation assessments in oncology settings., (© 2021, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Introduction: Information regarding availability of electronic healthcare databases in the Asia-Pacific region is critical for planning vaccine safety assessments particularly, as COVID-19 vaccines are introduced. This study aimed to identify data sources in the region, potentially suitable for vaccine safety surveillance. This manuscript is endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE)., Methods: Nineteen countries targeted for database reporting were identified using published country lists and review articles. Surveillance capacity was assessed using two surveys: a 9-item introductory survey and a 51-item full survey. Survey questions related to database characteristics, covariate and health outcome variables, vaccine exposure characteristics, access and governance, and dataset linkage capability. Other questions collated research/regulatory applications of the data and local publications detailing database use for research., Results: Eleven databases containing vaccine-specific information were identified across 8 countries. Databases were largely national in coverage (8/11, 73%), encompassed all ages (9/11, 82%) with population size from 1.4 to 52 million persons. Vaccine exposure information varied particularly for standardized vaccine codes (5/11, 46%), brand (7/11, 64%) and manufacturer (5/11, 46%). Outcome data were integrated with vaccine data in 6 (55%) databases and available via linkage in 5 (46%) databases. Data approval processes varied, impacting on timeliness of data access., Conclusions: Variation in vaccine data availability, complexities in data access including, governance and data release approval procedures, together with requirement for data linkage for outcome information, all contribute to the challenges in building a distributed network for vaccine safety assessment in the Asia-Pacific and globally. Common data models (CDMs) may help expedite vaccine safety research across the region., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Parents indicate that safety is their top concern about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. A data-mining method not requiring prespecification of health outcome(s) or postexposure period(s) of potentially increased risk can be used to identify possible associations between an exposure and any of thousands of medically attended health outcomes; this method was applied to data on the 9-valent HPV vaccine (HPV9) to detect potential safety problems. Data on 9- to 26-year-olds who had received HPV9 vaccine between November 4, 2016, and August 5, 2018, inclusive, were extracted from the MarketScan database and analyzed for statistically significant clustering of incident diagnoses within the hierarchy of diagnoses coded using the International Classification of Diseases and temporally within the 1 year after vaccination, using the self-controlled tree-temporal scan statistic and TreeScan software. Only 56 days of postvaccination enrollment was required; subsequent follow-up was censored at disenrollment. Multiple testing was adjusted for. The analysis included 493,089 doses of HPV9. Almost all signals resulted from temporal confounding, not unexpected with a 1-year follow-up period. The only plausible signals were for nonspecific adverse events (e.g., injection-site reactions, headache) on days 1-2 after vaccination, with attributable risks as low as 1 per 100,000 vaccinees. Considering the broad scope of the evaluation and the high statistical power, the findings of no specific serious adverse events should provide reassurance about this vaccine's safety., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.)

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the utilization of Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatments, donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine, in Korea with Australia and other countries with universal health coverage., Methods: Reimbursement criteria and the patent status of four AD treatments in Korea and Australia were reviewed. The monthly spending and utilization of the treatments were extracted from the national electronic database in Korea and Australia. The defined daily dose per 1000 elderly population per day (DDD/1000e/day) were calculated from July 2008 to June 2019. Annual cost trends of Norway and England were compared with Korea and Australia., Results: With the highest share of the use of donepezil in both countries, the cost and utilization of AD treatments in Korea increased more rapidly and remained higher than Australia. The cost of AD treatments in Korea increased by 15.5% every year during the study period, while the spending of the same drugs in Australia decreased by 10.5% annually. The utilization in DDD/1000e/day of AD treatments in Korea increased by 18.3% annually compared with 1.4% in Australia. When compared with Norway and England, countries with similar universal health coverage (UHC) system and elderly polupation, the cost of AD treatments in Korea was still higher with the opposite trend from other countries., Conclusions: Despite the similar UHC systems, there were considerable differences in the post-market utilization of AD treatments in Korea from Australia and other countries. This results can be attributed to differences in re-assessment system, pricing and reimbursement policies, and prescribing culture. This study provides a baseline to explore more comprehensive cross-country studies on rational use of medicines.

Introduction: Considering the need for effective postmarketing surveillance of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS), we analyzed the potential of the spontaneous reports for safety signal detection, verifying the completeness of the reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: All reports with DMTs for MS considered the primary suspect cause of ADRs and registered between January 2004 and June 2019 were selected. The vigiGrade completeness score was applied and reports with a score greater than 0.80 were considered well documented. Descriptive statistical analysis and comparisons of well-documented reports by DMTs were performed. Results: A total of 297,926 reports were analyzed. The lowest completeness rates were observed for type of report (13.5%), dose (62.7%), and time from treatment start to the ADR (79.0%). Overall, 80.8% of reports were classified as well documented and those related to natalizumab had the highest proportion (92.4%, p < 0.001), while the lowest was observed for reports sent in 2017 (53.1%, p < 0.001) and for teriflunomide (48.5%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The high proportion of well-documented reports for DMTs indicates that they can be a valuable source for safety signal detection. A more careful analysis should be performed for data from the groups identified with low completeness to avoid the disclosure of spurious results.

Objective: The International Cooperative Growth Study, NutropinAq ® European Registry (iNCGS) (NCT00455728) monitored long-term safety and effectiveness of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH; NutropinAq ® [somatropin]) in paediatric growth disorders., Methods: Open-label, non-interventional, post-marketing surveillance study recruiting children with growth disorders. Endpoints included gain in height standard deviation score (SDS), adult height, and occurrence of adverse events (AEs)., Results: 2792 patients were enrolled. 2082 patients (74.6%) had growth hormone deficiency (GHD), which was isolated idiopathic in 1825 patients (87.7%). Non-GHD diagnoses included Turner syndrome (TS) (n=199), chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) (n=10), other non-GHD (n=498), and missing data for three participants. Improvements from baseline height SDS occurred at all time points to Month 132, and in all subgroups by disease aetiology. At Month 12, mean (95% CI) change in height SDS by aetiology was: idiopathic GHD 0.63 (0.61;0.66), organic GHD 0.71 (0.62;0.80), TS 0.59 (0.53; 0.65), CRI 0.54 (-0.49;1.56), and other non-GHD 0.64 (0.59;0.69). Mean height ( ± SD) at the last visit among the 235 patients with adult or near-adult height recorded was 154.0 cm ( ± 8.0) for girls and 166.7 cm ( ± 8.0) for boys. The most frequent biological and clinical non-serious drug-related AEs were increased insulin-like growth factor concentrations (314 events) and injection site haematoma (99 events). Serious AEs related to rhGH according to investigators were reported (n=30); the most frequent were scoliosis (4 events), epiphysiolysis (3 events), and strabismus (2 events)., Conclusions: There was an improvement in mean height SDS in all aetiology subgroups after rhGH treatment. No new safety concerns were identified., Competing Interests: RC received honoraria for lectures and for the scientific organization of meetings from Sandoz, Ipsen, Novo Nordisk, Lilly, and Pfizer. JB-M received honoraria for lectures from Lilly, Merck Ferring, Sandoz and Ipsen and participated in Ipsen advisory board. DS served in advisory boards for Kyowa Kirin, Ipsen, Merck Serono, Novo Nordisk; received honoraria for lectures and for the scientific organization of meetings from, Hexal/Sandoz Ipsen, Merck Serono, Novo Nordisk and Pfizer; and received research grants from Hexal/Sandoz, Kyowa Kirin and Pfizer. MD received honoraria for lectures and for the scientific organization of meetings from Sandoz, Ipsen, Novo Nordisk and Pfizer. CS and VP are employees of Ipsen. The authors declare that this study received funding from Ipsen. The funder contributed to study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and funded editorial support for preparation of the manuscript. The authors take full responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Coutant, Bosch Muñoz, Dumitrescu, Schnabel, Sert, Perrot and Dattani.)

Edge restenosis has still been reported after second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. It was more likely attributable to post-procedural angiographic results than to the patient's background. The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate a prediction model for restenosis in proximal edge after 2nd-generation DES stent implantation using angiographic data. Data were obtained from several post-marketing surveillance (PMS) studies of the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) and platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES), second-generation DES, in Japan. Angiographic analysis was conducted at baseline and after 8 or 12 months. We focused on the proximal edge of angiographic analysis. The main outcome was restenosis defined as ≥ 50% diameter stenosis at follow-up. The predictive performance of the prediction model based on multivariable logistic regression was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration, which were internally validated by the bootstrap method. We also performed decision curve analysis to assess threshold of predicted probability of restenosis at which additional intervention was considered. Among 2053 lesions in 1860 patients, restenosis rates in proximal edge was 2.8%. The final model was constructed with % post-procedural diameter stenosis (DS) and post-procedural reference diameter (RD) as strong predictors for edge restenosis. Discrimination and calibration were satisfactory with optimism-corrected C-statistics 0.75. Predicted probability between 0.03 and 0.24 was preferable threshold for restenosis treatments. Our prediction model can be used to obtain valid prediction for restenosis in proximal edge, assisting to know complete stent coverage of lesion.

Background: Most post-licensure vaccine pharmacovigilance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are passive reporting systems. These have limited utility for maternal immunization pharmacovigilance in LMIC settings and need to be supplemented with active surveillance. Our study's main objective was to identify existing perinatal data collection systems in LMICs that collect individual information on maternal and neonatal health outcomes and could be developed to inform active safety surveillance of novel vaccines for use during pregnancy., Methods: A scoping review was performed following the Arksey and O'Malley six-stage approach. We included studies describing electronic or mixed paper-electronic data collection systems in LMICs, including research networks, electronic medical records, and custom software platforms for health information systems. Medline PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Bibliography of Asian Studies (BAS), and CINAHL were searched through August 2019. We also searched grey literature including through Google and websites of existing relevant perinatal data collection systems, as well as contacted authors of key studies and experts in the field to validate the information and identify additional sources of relevant unpublished information., Results: A total of 11,817 records were identified. The full texts of 264 records describing 96 data collection systems were assessed for eligibility. Eight perinatal data collection systems met our inclusion criteria: Global Network's Maternal Newborn Health Registry, International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and their Health; Perinatal Informatic System; Pregnancy Exposure Registry & Birth Defects Surveillance; SmartCare; Open Medical Record System; Open Smart Register Platform and District Health Information Software 2. These selected systems were qualitatively characterized according to seven different domains: governance; system design; system management; data management; data sources, outcomes and data quality., Conclusion: This review provides a list of active maternal and neonatal data collection systems in LMICs and their characteristics as well as their outreach, strengths, and limitations. Findings could potentially help further understand where to obtain population-based high-quality information on outcomes to inform the conduct of maternal immunization active vaccine safety surveillance activities and research in LMICs.

Background: Vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are raising concerns about vaccine safety, particularly in the context of large-scale immunization. To address public concerns, we measured the baseline incidence rates of major conditions potentially related to vaccine-related adverse events (VAEs). We aimed to provide a basis for evaluating VAEs and verifying causality., Methods: Conditions of interest were selected from the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System Table of Reportable Events and a recent report from a European consortium on vaccine surveillance. We used the National Health Insurance Service database in Korea to identify the monthly numbers of cases with these conditions. Data from January 2006 to June 2020 were included. Prediction models were constructed from the observed incidences using an autoregressive integrated moving average. We predicted the incidences of the conditions and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for January through December 2021. In addition, subgroup analysis for the expected vaccination population was conducted., Results: Mean values (95% CIs) of the predicted monthly incidence of vasovagal syncope, anaphylaxis, brachial neuritis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Bell's palsy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, encephalopathy, optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and systemic lupus erythematosus in 2021 were 23.89 (19.81-27.98), 4.72 (3.83-5.61), 57.62 (51.37-63.88), 0.03 (0.01-0.04), 8.58 (7.90-9.26), 0.26 (0.18-0.34), 2.13 (1.42-2.83), 1.65 (1.17-2.13), 0.19 (0.14-0.25), 0.75 (0.61-0.90), and 3.40 (2.79-4.01) cases per 100,000 respectively. The majority of the conditions showed an increasing trend with seasonal variations in their incidences., Conclusion: We measured the incidence of a total of 11 conditions that could potentially be associated with VAEs to predict the monthly incidence in 2021. In Korea, conditions that could potentially be related to VAEs occur on a regular basis, and an increasing trend is observed with seasonality., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© 2021 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.)

Lenvatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor used against nonoperative thyroid cancer; however, hypertension is a major dose-limiting side effect. In this study, hypertension caused by lenvatinib was described through a novel population pharmacodynamic model using postmarketing surveillance data obtained in Japan. The model consists of two maximum effect model components based on the (1) concentration of lenvatinib in plasma and (2) cumulative area under the curve of lenvatinib. In addition, antihypertensive drug of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker or calcium channel blocker accounted for by lowering effect on diastolic blood pressure. Based on virtual simulations, the combination of antihypertensive drug and dose adjustment of lenvatinib showed a reduction in the probability of grade greater than or equal to 3 hypertension. The present model provides useful guidance in managing hypertension during treatment with lenvatinib in the real-world setting., (© 2021 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

In 2019, the FDA Oncology Center of Excellence launched Project Orbis, a global collaborative review program to facilitate faster patient access to innovative cancer therapies across multiple countries. Project Orbis aims for concurrent submission, review, and regulatory action for high-impact clinically significant marketing applications among the participating partner countries. Current Project Orbis partners (POP) include the regulatory health authorities (RHA) of Australia, Brazil, Canada, Singapore, and Switzerland. Project Orbis leverages the existing scientific and regulatory partnerships between the various RHA under mutual confidentiality agreements. While FDA serves as the primary coordinator for application selection and review, each country remains fully independent on their final regulatory decision. In the first year of Project Orbis (June 2019 to June 2020), a total of 60 oncology marketing applications were received, representing 16 unique projects, and resulting in 38 approvals. New molecular entities, also known as new active substances, comprised 28% of the received marketing applications. The median time gap between FDA and Orbis submission dates was 0.6 months with a range of -0.8 to 9.0 months. Across the program, the median time-to-approval was similar between FDA (4.2 months, range 0.9-6.9, N = 18) and the POP (4.4 months, range 1.7-6.8, N = 20). Participating countries have signified a strong commitment for continuation and growth of the program. Project Orbis expansion considerations include the addition of more countries and management of more complex applications., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: The therapeutic landscape for psoriasis is ever-changing. Risankizumab is the newest approved biologic and one of three currently licensed that targets the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23). It is increasingly clear that different biologics vary in their efficacy, effectiveness, and safety profiles, highlighting that there is a need to understand for which patients and in which circumstances to use each drug., Areas Covered: This article summarizes original clinical trial data, and reviews in more detail recent post-marketing studies and meta-analyses that differentiate risankizumab from other biologics. It also briefly explores the evidence for risankizumab in the treatment of other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases., Expert Opinion: Risankizumab is a highly effective biologic for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Recent open-label extension data for risankizumab shows sustained treatment responses to week 136. Indirect comparisons suggest IL-17 inhibitors have a faster onset, though head-to-head comparison with secukinumab shows non-inferiority at week 16 and superiority of risankizumab at week 52. Risankizumab is very well tolerated and data from the IMMhance trial suggests that risankizumab can be used in patients with latent tuberculosis without risk of reactivation.

Purpose: Internationally, there has been widespread medical use of cannabis medicines before rigorous evaluations in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Some advocates of medicinal use of cannabis argue that real-world evidence (RWE) can be a substitute for or at least supplement evidence from RCTs. We explore the utility, limitations and impact of RWE in the translation of cannabis medicines research into clinical practice using the established literature., Methods: A literature search was performed via Embase and Medline using a diverse range of cannabinoid and RWE search terms. The review provides a snapshot of cannabis medicine RWE initiatives from around the world., Results: Diverse and novel sources of real-world data and RWE include international cannabis registries, surveys, post-marketing data collection and use of electronic or digital health records. The strengths and limitations of using RWE in translational research are highlighted, along with the identification of barriers to RCTs involving cannabis medicines., Conclusions: RWE promises to play a significant role in the evaluation of cannabis medicines around the world. When used appropriately RWE may complement RCT data by providing valuable insights into cannabis medicine safety and effectiveness., Take Home Messages: It is important that real-world evidence (RWE) is used to complement rather than replace randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence on cannabis medicines. Technological advances have created the opportunity to explore diverse and novel sources of cannabis medicine RWE. Although RWE may be more reflective of real-world clinical practice, it cannot provide conclusive evidence of the safety and efficacy of cannabis medicines. While acknowledging its limitations, RWE may nonetheless provide some guidance on safety and adverse events of cannabis medicines. RWE has already had a significant impact on the regulation of cannabis medicines., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Importance: Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), primarily used to treat atopic dermatitis (AD), carry a black box label warning users about the potential for increased skin cancer risk. The risk associated with keratinocyte carcinoma (KC), the most common cancer, defined as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), remains poorly defined because findings from large-scale postmarketing surveillance studies have not been reported., Objectives: To examine KC risk overall and by subtype (BCC and SCC) among adults with AD exposed to TCIs compared with those exposed to topical corticosteroids (primary comparator group) and those unexposed to TCIs or topical corticosteroids (alternative comparator group) as well as alterations in risk with TCI dose, frequency, and duration of exposure., Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large, integrated health care delivery system, of adults 40 years or older (n = 93 746) with a physician-rendered diagnosis of AD or dermatitis. Patients who were diagnosed from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2013, were included, with follow-up through December 31, 2017. Data analysis was conducted from June 1, 2016, to October 1, 2018., Exposures: Time-varying pharmacy-dispensed TCI exposure (n = 7033) over the study period was compared with topical corticosteroids (n = 73 674) and no TCI or topical corticosteroid exposure (n = 46 141)., Main Outcomes and Measures: Electronic pathologic testing-validated incident KCs (n = 7744)., Results: Among a cohort of 93 746 members, the mean (SD) age was 58.5 (12.7) years, and 55 023 patients (58.7%) were women. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression revealed no association between TCI exposure and KC risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93-1.13) compared with topical corticosteroid exposure. Similarly, there were no significant differences in BCC risk (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.14, TCI vs topical corticosteroids) or SCC risk (aHR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.82-1.08, TCI vs topical corticosteroids). Changing the comparator group to unexposed individuals yielded similar findings (aHR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.91-1.19, TCI vs unexposed for basal cell carcinoma). There were no associations between TCI dose, frequency, and duration of use and BCC, SCC, or overall KC risk., Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this postmarketing surveillance study of adult health plan members with AD revealed no apparent association between TCI exposure and overall KC, BCC, or SCC risk. Secondary analyses examining dose, frequency, and duration of TCI exposure revealed no associations. These findings suggest that use of TCIs may be safe with respect to KC risk among adults with AD.