Search

Background:. The radial forearm free flap is frequently chosen for phalloplasty; however, flap size required for phalloplasty is associated with a large scar burden and functional concerns. We sought to investigate donor site functionality, aesthetics, and volume deficits in a cohort of individuals who underwent radial forearm phalloplasty (RFP) with donor site skin grafting alone or dermal substitute and subsequent skin grafting. Methods:. Donor site functionality was assessed using the quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH). Patient- and clinician-reported aesthetics were assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). An Artec Leo three-dimensional scanner was used to measure volumetric differences from the donor site forearm and contralateral forearm. Results:. Fifteen patients who underwent RFP agreed to participate. No statistically significant differences were identified between different donor site closure methods regarding qDASH, patient-reported POSAS, or total volumetric deficits. A blinded clinician reported that POSAS approached significance at 4.7 for biodegradable temporizing matrix (BTM), 4.2 for Integra, and 3.0 for split-thickness skin graft (P = 0.05). No statistically significant differences were identified regarding distal, middle, or proximal volume deficits; however, a trend was observed regarding total volumetric deficits with BTM experiencing the lowest deficit (10.3 cm3) and skin graft experiencing the highest deficit (21.5 cm3, P = 0.82). Conclusions:. The addition of dermal matrix (BTM or Integra) to the treatment algorithm for RFP did not show statistically significant improvement in donor site volume deficits, patient-reported scar appearance (POSAS), or functionality (qDASH).