Search

Objectives To characterize the phenotypic presentation at diagnosis of childhood-onset primary SS. Methods The Big Data Sjögren Project Consortium is an international, multicentre registry using worldwide data-sharing cooperative merging of pre-existing clinical SS databases from the five continents. For this study, we selected those patients in whom the disease was diagnosed below the age of 19 years according to the fulfilment of the 2002/2016 classification criteria. Results Among the 12 083 patients included in the Sjögren Big Data Registry, 158 (1.3%) patients had a childhood-onset diagnosis (136 girls, mean age of 14.2 years): 126 (80%) reported dry mouth, 111 (70%) dry eyes, 52 (33%) parotid enlargement, 118/122 (97%) positive minor salivary gland biopsy and 60/64 (94%) abnormal salivary US study, 140/155 (90%) positive ANA, 138/156 (89%) anti-Ro/La antibodies and 86/142 (68%) positive RF. The systemic EULAR Sjögren’s syndrome disease activity index (ESSDAI) domains containing the highest frequencies of active patients included the glandular (47%), articular (26%) and lymphadenopathy (25%) domains. Patients with childhood-onset primary SS showed the highest mean ESSDAI score and the highest frequencies of systemic disease in 5 (constitutional, lymphadenopathy, glandular, cutaneous and haematological) of the 12 ESSDAI domains, and the lowest frequencies in 4 (articular, pulmonary, peripheral nerve and CNS) in comparison with patients with adult-onset disease. Conclusions Childhood-onset primary SS involves around 1% of patients with primary SS, with a clinical phenotype dominated by sicca features, parotid enlargement and systemic disease. Age at diagnosis plays a key role in modulating the phenotypic expression of the disease.

For many decades, the clinical unmet needs of primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS) have been left unresolved due to the rareness of the disease and the complexity of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms, including the pSS-associated lymphomagenesis process. Here, we present the HarmonicSS cloud-computing exemplar which offers beyond the state-of-the-art data analytics services to address the pSS clinical unmet needs, including the development of lymphoma classification models and the identification of biomarkers for lymphomagenesis. The users of the platform have been able to successfully interlink, curate, and harmonize 21 regional, national, and international European cohorts of 7,551 pSS patients with respect to the ethical and legal issues for data sharing. Federated AI algorithms were trained across the harmonized databases, with reduced execution time complexity, yielding robust lymphoma classification models with 85% accuracy, 81.25% sensitivity, 85.4% specificity along with 5 biomarkers for lymphoma development. To our knowledge, this is the first GDPR compliant platform that provides federated AI services to address the pSS clinical unmet needs. © 2022 The Author(s)

Objective. To analyse how the main components of the disease phenotype (sicca symptoms, diagnostic tests, immunological markers and systemic disease) can be driven by the age at diagnosis of primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS). Methods. By January 2021, the participant centres had included 12,753 patients from 25 countries that fulfilled the 2002/2016 classification criteria for pSS. The age at diagnosis was defined as the time when the attending physician confirmed fulfilment of the criteria. Patients were clustered according to age at diagnosis. 50 clusters with more than 100 observations (from 27 to 76 years) were used to study the influence of the age at diagnosis in the disease expression. Results. There was a consistent increase in the frequency of oral dryness according to the age at diagnosis, with a frequency of 95% in those diagnosed at the oldest ages. The smooth curves that best fitted a linear model were the frequency of dry mouth (adjusted R-2 0.87) and the frequency of abnormal oral tests (adjusted R-2 0.72). Therefore, for each 1-year increase in the age at diagnosis, the frequency of dry mouth increased by 0.13%, and the frequency of abnormal oral diagnostic tests by 0.11%. There was a consistent year-by-year decrease in the frequency of all autoantibodies and immunological markers except for cryoglobulins. According to the linear models, for each 1-year increase in the age at diagnosis, the frequency of a positive result decreased by 0.57% (for anti-Ro antibodies), 0.47% (for RF) and 0.42% (for anti-La antibodies). The ESSDAI domains which showed a more consistent decrease were glandular and lymph node involvement (for each 1-year increase in the age at diagnosis, the frequency of activity decreased by 0.18%), and constitutional, cutaneous, and haematological involvements (the frequency decreased by 0.09% for each 1-year increase). In contrast, other domains showed an ascending pattern, especially pulmonary involvement (for each 1-year increase in the age at diagnosis, the frequency of activity increased by 0.22%), and peripheral nerve involvement (the frequency increased by 0.09% for each 1-year increase). Conclusion. The influence of the age at diagnosis on the key phenotypic features of pSS is strong, and should be considered critical not only for designing a personalised diagnostic approach, but also to be carefully considered when analysing the results of diagnostic tests and immunological parameters, and when internal organ involvement is suspected at diagnosis.

Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA, Churg-Strauss syndrome) is a rare anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) characterised by respiratory manifestations and systemic organ involvement [1]. Particularly, cardiac manifestations occur in 40–60% of patients, representing the leading cause of mortality [2]. Recent reports suggest that venous thromboembolic events might also represent a consistent burden of disease [3, 4], as already known for the other AAVs [5–7], possibly due to eosinophil-mediated vascular inflammation [5]. Nevertheless, the occurrence of arterial and venous thrombotic events (AVTE) has never been systematically explored in EGPA. Footnotes This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the European Respiratory Journal . It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJ online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article. Conflict of interest: Alessandra Bettiol Conflict of interest: Renato Alberto Sinico Conflict of interest: Franco Schiavon Conflict of interest: Sara Monti Conflict of interest: Enrica Paola Bozzolo Conflict of interest: Franco Franceschini Conflict of interest: Marcello Govoni Conflict of interest: Claudio Lunardi Conflict of interest: Giuseppe Guida Conflict of interest: Giuseppe Lopalco Conflict of interest: Giuseppe Paolazzi Conflict of interest: Angelo Vacca Conflict of interest: Gina Gregorini Conflict of interest: Pietro Leccese Conflict of interest: Matteo Piga Conflict of interest: Fabrizio Conti Conflict of interest: Paolo Fraticelli Conflict of interest: Luca Quartuccio Conflict of interest: Federico Alberici Conflict of interest: Carlo Salvarani Conflict of interest: Silvano Bettio Conflict of interest: Simone Negrini Conflict of interest: Carlo Selmi Conflict of interest: Savino Sciascia Conflict of interest: Gabriella Moroni Conflict of interest: Loredana Colla Conflict of interest: Carlo Manno Conflict of interest: Maria Letizia Urban Conflict of interest: Alfredo Vannacci Conflict of interest: Maria Rosa Pozzi Conflict of interest: Paolo Fabbrini Conflict of interest: Stefano Polti Conflict of interest: Mara Felicetti Conflict of interest: Maria Rita Marchi Conflict of interest: Roberto Padoan Conflict of interest: Paolo Delvino Conflict of interest: Roberto Caporali Conflict of interest: Carlomaurizio Montecucco Conflict of interest: Lorenzo Dagna Conflict of interest: Adriana Cariddi Conflict of interest: Paola Toniati Conflict of interest: Dr. Tamanini reports other from Glaxo Smith Kline, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: Federica Furini Conflict of interest: Alessandra Bortoluzzi Conflict of interest: Elisa Tinazzi Conflict of interest: Lorenzo Delfino Conflict of interest: Iuliana Badiu Conflict of interest: Giovanni Rolla Conflict of interest: Vincenzo Venerito Conflict of interest: Florenzo Iannone Conflict of interest: Alvise Berti Conflict of interest: Roberto Bortolotti Conflict of interest: Vito Racanelli Conflict of interest: Guido Jeannin Conflict of interest: Angela Padula Conflict of interest: Alberto Cauli Conflict of interest: Roberta Priori Conflict of interest: Armando Gabrielli Conflict of interest: Milena Bond Conflict of interest: Martina Tedesco Conflict of interest: Giulia Pazzola Conflict of interest: Paola Tomietto Conflict of interest: Marco Pellecchio Conflict of interest: Chiara Marvisi Conflict of interest: Federica Maritati Conflict of interest: Alessandra Palmisano Conflict of interest: Christian Dejaco Conflict of interest: Johann Willeit Conflict of interest: Stefan Kiechl Conflict of interest: Iacopo Olivotto Conflict of interest: Peter Willeit Conflict of interest: Domenico Prisco Conflict of interest: Augusto Vaglio Conflict of interest: Giacomo Emmi

Following publication of the original article [1], it was brought to our attention that the AOSD Consensus Group was incorrectly tagged and therefore not searchable. The publishers apologize for this error.

Following publication of the original article [1], it was brought to our attention that the AOSD Consensus Group was incorrectly tagged and therefore not searchable. The publishers apologize for this error.

To analyse the frequency and characteristics of post-COVID-19 syndrome in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) affected by acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.By the first week of April 2021, all centres included in the Big Data Sjögren Consortium were contacted asking for patients included in the Registry diagnosed with SARSCoV-2 infection according to the ECDC guidelines. According to the NICE definitions, symptoms related to COVID-19 were classified as acute COVID-19 (signs and symptoms for up to 4 weeks), ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 (presence of signs and symptoms from 4 to 12 weeks) and post-COVID-19 syndrome (signs and symptoms that continue for12 weeks not explained by an alternative diagnosis after a protocolized study).We identified 132 patients who were followed a mean follow-up of 137.8 days (ranging from 5 days to 388 days) after being diagnosed with COVID-19. In the last visit, 75 (57%) patients remained symptomatic: 68 (52%) remained symptomatic for more than 4 weeks fulfilling the NICE definition for ongoing symptomatic post-COVID-19, and 38 (29%) remained symptomatic for more than 12 weeks fulfilling the definition of post-COVID-19 syndrome. More than 40% of pSS patients reported the persistence of four symptoms or more, including anxiety/depression (59%), arthralgias (56%), sleep disorder (44%), fatigue (40%), anosmia (34%) and myalgias (32%). Age-sex adjusted multivariate analysis identified raised LDH levels (OR 10.36), raised CRP levels (OR 7.33), use of hydroxychloroquine (OR 3.51) and antiviral agents (OR 3.38), hospital admission (OR 8.29), mean length of hospital admission (OR 1.1) and requirement of supplemental oxygen (OR 6.94) as factors associated with a higher risk of developing post-COVID-19 syndrome. A sensitivity analysis including hospital admission in the adjusted model confirmed raised CRP levels (OR 8.6, 95% CI 1.33-104.44) and use of hydroxychloroquine (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.00-6.47) as the key independent factors associated with an enhanced risk of developing post-COVID-19 syndrome.This is the first study that analyses the frequency and characteristics of post-COVID-19 syndrome in patients affected by a systemic autoimmune disease. We found that 57% of patients with pSS affected by COVID-19 remain symptomatic after a mean follow-up of 5 months. The risk of developing post-COVID-19 syndrome in patients who required hospitalisation was 8-times higher than in non-hospitalised patients, with baseline raised CRP levels and the use of hydroxychloroquine being independent risk factors for post-COVID-19.

Antimalarials have been associated with QT prolongation in COVID-19 patients but are generally safe in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).We compared the prevalence of QTc prolongation between COVID-19 and SLE patients treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ).We included patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by nasopharyngeal swab and patients taking HCQ for SLE. A prolonged QTc was defined as an increase in QTc intervals60 ms (compared with baseline) or as a QTc of ≥500 ms. We performed the univariate and multivariate logistic regression to investigate the risk factors for QTc prolongation in COVID-19 patients.We enrolled 58 COVID-19 patients (median age 70.5 years, IQR 25), grouped into group A (patients with HCQ) group B (patients with HCQ + azithromycin) and group C (not received either drug). Fifty (26%) COVID-19 patients presented a QTc prolongation (12 QTc≥500 ms, 3 patients ΔQTc60 ms). We did not find any differences in QTc prolongation among the three treatment groups. Baseline QTc (OR 111.5) and D-dimer (OR 78.3) were independently associated to QTc prolongation. Compared to the 50 SLE patients (median age 38.5 years, IQR 22), chronically treated with HCQ, COVID-19 patients showed significantly longer QTc (p0.001).This is the first study demonstrating that, unlike COVID-19 patients, patients with SLE are not susceptible to HCQ-induced long QT syndrome and arrhythmia. The combined arrhythmogenic effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection and HCQ could account for the excess of QTc prolongation and fatal arrhythmias described in patients with COVID-19.

Autoimmune diseases (AIDs) share similar serological, clinical, and radiological findings, but, behind these common features, there are different pathogenic mechanisms, immune cells dysfunctions, and targeted organs. In this context, multiple lines of evidence suggest the application of precision medicine principles to AIDs to reduce the treatment failure. Precision medicine refers to the tailoring of therapeutic strategies to the individual characteristics of each patient, thus it could be a new approach for management of AIDS which considers individual variability in genes, environmental exposure, and lifestyle. Precision medicine would also assist physicians in choosing the right treatment, the best timing of administration, consequently trying to maximize drug efficacy, and, possibly, reducing adverse events. In this work, the growing body of evidence is summarized regarding the predictive factors for drug response in patients with AIDs, applying the precision medicine principles to provide high-quality evidence for therapeutic opportunities in improving the management of these patients. © 2020

Baricitinib is a Janus-kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). We report the first real-life experience with baricitinib in a monocentric cohort of unselected RA patients.We enrolled consecutive RA patients starting baricitinib. At baseline and after 4, 12, 24 and 48 weeks we assessed the disease activity by composite indices (SDAI, CDAI and DAS28CRP) and ultrasonography, and we recorded any adverse events. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving SDAI remission at week 4.We enrolled 59 patients [(F:M = 50:9, median age 58.1 years (IQR 12.8), median disease duration 144 (IQR 150) months] treated with baricitinib in combination with a csDMARD (52.5%) or monotherapy (47.5%) for a median follow-up of 24 weeks (IQR 36). The 12-month drug retention rate was 74%. At weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48 we observed a significant reduction of DAS28, CDAI and SDAI, global health and pain (p0.001 for all). After 4 weeks of treatment, 12% of patients achieved SDAI remission. Concomitant csDMARDs, previous biological DMARDs, gender, seropositivity and BMI did not affect the efficacy of baricitinib. Baricitinib allowed a significant reduction in prednisone dose after 12 and 24 weeks and a rapid and sustained ultrasound improvement. No serious adverse events, serious infections or cardiovascular events were recorded.Our study confirms the efficacy and safety profile and rapid onset of the effect of baricitinib in RA patients in a real-life setting.

Objective To analyse the prognosis and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with primary SS. Methods We searched for patients with primary SS presenting with SARS-CoV-2 infection (defined following and according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control guidelines) among those included in the Big Data Sjögren Registry, an international, multicentre registry of patients diagnosed according to the 2002/2016 classification criteria. Results A total of 51 patients were included in the study (46 women, mean age at diagnosis of infection of 60 years). According to the number of patients with primary SS evaluated in the Registry (n = 8211), the estimated frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.62% (95% CI 0.44, 0.80). All but two presented with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19, including fever (82%), cough (57%), dyspnoea (39%), fatigue/myalgias (27%) and diarrhoea (24%), and the most frequent abnormalities included raised lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (88%), CRP (81%) and D-dimer (82%) values, and lymphopenia (70%). Infection was managed at home in 26 (51%) cases and 25 (49%) required hospitalization (five required admission to ICU, four died). Compared with patients managed at home, those requiring hospitalization had higher odds of having lymphopenia as laboratory abnormality (adjusted OR 21.22, 95% CI 2.39, 524.09). Patients with comorbidities had an older age (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00, 1.11) and showed a risk for hospital admission six times higher than those without (adjusted OR 6.01, 95% CI 1.72, 23.51) in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion Baseline comorbidities were a key risk factor for a more complicated COVID-19 in patients with primary SS, with higher rates of hospitalization and poor outcomes in comparison with patients without comorbidities.

BackgroundAdult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) is a rare inflammatory condition characterized by fever, rash, and arthritis. Because of its rarity, clinical trials are inherently small and often uncontrolled. Our objective was to develop recommendations for the use of interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors in the management of patients with AOSD, based on the best evidence and expert opinion.MethodsA panel of 10 experts (9 rheumatologists and 1 pediatrician) was established. The first step was dedicated to a comprehensive literature review and development of statements. Two separate literature searches were performed on the MEDLINE (Pubmed), EMBASE, and BIOSIS databases through April 2018 to identify (1) differences and similarities between AOSD and pediatric Still’s disease (systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis [SJIA]) and (2) the efficacy and safety of IL-1 inhibitors in AOSD treatment. In the second step, the statements were submitted in a Delphi process to a panel of 67 rheumatologists. Consensus threshold was set at 66%: positive, > 66% of voters selected scores 3 to 5; negative, > 66% of voters selected scores 1 or 2. In the third step, the voting results were analyzed, and the statements were finalized.ResultsEleven statements were developed. Forty-six of 67 rheumatologists (72%) participated in the Delphi process. A positive consensus was reached after the first round of voting and was full (> 95%) on the majority of statements. A large consensus was achieved in considering AOSD and SJIA as the same disease. The use of anti-IL-1 therapies in refractory patients was considered quite safe and effective both as the first and as a subsequent line of biologic treatment, especially in systemic patients. Because of the lack of head-to-head comparisons, a different profile of efficacy among IL-1 inhibitors could not be established. There was a large consensus that failure of the first IL-1 inhibitor does not preclude response to another one. The lack of studies comparing early versus late treatment did not allow to draw conclusions; however, data from SJIA suggest a better response in early treatment.ConclusionsThe Delphi method was used to develop recommendations that we hope will help clinicians in the management of patients with AOSD refractory to conventional therapies.