1. Should tobacco sales be restricted to state‐run alcohol outlets? Perspectives from 10 US alcohol control states
- Author
-
Smith, Elizabeth A, McDaniel, Patricia A, and Malone, Ruth E
- Subjects
Public Health ,Health Sciences ,Substance Misuse ,Tobacco ,Tobacco Smoke and Health ,Alcoholism ,Alcohol Use and Health ,Clinical Research ,3.1 Primary prevention interventions to modify behaviours or promote wellbeing ,Prevention of disease and conditions ,and promotion of well-being ,Cancer ,Cardiovascular ,Stroke ,Good Health and Well Being ,Humans ,United States ,Commerce ,Alcoholic Beverages ,Tobacco Products ,Marketing ,Qualitative Research ,State Government ,Alcohol Drinking ,Alcohol control states ,qualitative research ,retail policy ,tobacco end-game ,tobacco industry ,tobacco policy ,Medical and Health Sciences ,Psychology and Cognitive Sciences ,Substance Abuse ,Public health ,Clinical and health psychology - Abstract
Background and aimsThe ubiquity of tobacco retailers helps to sustain the tobacco epidemic. A tobacco retail reduction approach that has not been tried is transitioning tobacco sales to state-controlled alcohol stores (TTS), which are limited in number and operate under some restrictions, e.g. regarding opening hours or marketing materials. This study summarizes policy experts' and advocates' views of TTS, including (1) advantages and disadvantages; (2) feasibility; and (3) potential implementation obstacles.DesignThis study was a qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews.SettingTen US states with alcoholic beverage control systems were included.ParticipantsThe participants comprised a total of 103 tobacco control advocates and professionals, public health officials, alcohol policy experts and alcohol control system representatives, including two tribal community representatives.MeasurementsInterviewees' perspectives on their state's alcoholic beverage control agency (ABC, the agency that oversees or operates a state alcohol monopoly) and on TTS were assessed.FindingsInterviewees thought TTS offered potential advantages, including reduced access to tobacco products, less exposure to tobacco advertising and a greater likelihood of successful smoking cessation. Some saw potential long-term health benefits for communities of color, due to the smaller number of state alcohol stores in those communities. Interviewees also raised concerns regarding TTS, including ABCs' limited focus on public health and emphasis on revenue generation, which could conflict with tobacco use reduction efforts. Some interviewees thought TTS could enhance the power of the tobacco and alcohol industries, increase calls for alcohol system privatization or create difficulties for those in recovery.ConclusionsIn the United States, transitioning tobacco sales to state-controlled alcohol stores (TTS) could have a positive public health impact by reducing tobacco availability, marketing exposure and, ultimately, tobacco use. However, tensions exist between alcohol control system goals of providing revenue to the state and protecting public health. Should a state decide to pursue TTS, several guardrails should be established, including building into the legislation an explicit goal of reducing tobacco consumption.
- Published
- 2024