Search

Background/Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lattice radiotherapy (LRT) for large, inoperable breast cancers. Patients and Methods: In this prospective study, patients who underwent LRT for breast tumors that were ulcerating/fungating/extensively eroding the chest wall, and were ineligible/unwilling for surgery, were enrolled from May 2021 to Nov 2023. Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, pre- and post-LRT numerical rating scale (NRS), and post-LRT changes in quality of life (QoL) were recorded. Survival outcomes were reported at 6 months and 1-year. Median rates of survival and dosimetric parameters were calculated. Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and failure of local control (LC) were constructed. Results: Ten patients (8 females) underwent LRT. The median age was 76 years (range=57-99 years) and the median ECOG performance status was 2.5 (range=1-4). The planned schedule was completed by 9/10 patients, accounting for a 90% compliance rate. Among patients with pain (n=7), NRS rapidly reduced from 7 (range=5-10) to 3 (range=1-6). The median equivalent uniform dose was 0.71 Gy (0.09-1.59 Gy). The actuarial rates of 6-month LC, CSS, and OS were 75%, 89%, and 61%, respectively, with only LC rate changing to 50% at 1 year. Two patients had local relapse at the six-month and 1-year follow-up, respectively, after having achieved a complete response at three months, and two others died of COVID-19 infection and ischemic stroke. Conclusion: LRT was found to be effective and safe in palliating symptoms among patients with large inoperable breast tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The advent of hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and PET/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners resulted in an increased clinical relevance of nuclear medicine in oncology. The use of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) has also made it possible to study tumors (including breast cancer) from not only a dimensional perspective but also from a metabolic point of view. In particular, the use of [18F]FDG PET allowed early confirmation of the efficacy or failure of therapy. The purpose of this review was to assess the literature concerning the response to various therapies for different subtypes of breast cancer through PET. We start by summarizing studies that investigate the validation of PET/CT for the assessment of the response to therapy in breast cancer; then, we present studies that compare PET imaging (including PET devices dedicated to the breast) with CT and MRI, focusing on the identification of the most useful parameters obtainable from PET/CT. We also focus on novel non-FDG radiotracers, as they allow for the acquisition of information on specific aspects of the new therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To evaluate neurocognitive performance, daily activity and quality of life (QoL), other than usual oncologic outcomes, among patients with brain metastasis ≥5 (MBM) from solid tumors treated with Stereotactic Brain Irradiation (SBI) or Whole Brain Irradiation (WBI)., Methods: This multicentric randomized controlled trial will involve the enrollment of 100 patients (50 for each arm) with MBM ≥ 5, age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 70, life expectancy > 3 months, known primary tumor, with controlled or controllable extracranial disease, baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥ 20/30, Barthel Activities of Daily Living score ≥ 90/100, to be submitted to SBI by LINAC with monoisocentric technique and non-coplanar arcs (experimental arm) or to WBI (control arm). The primary endpoints are neurocognitive performance, QoL and autonomy in daily-life activities variations, the first one assessed by MoCa Score and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, the second one through the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-BN-20 questionnaires, the third one through the Barthel Index, respectively. The secondary endpoints are time to intracranial failure, overall survival, retreatment rate, acute and late toxicities, changing of KPS. It will be considered significant a statistical difference of at least 30% between the two arms (statistical power of 80% with a significance level of 95%)., Discussion: Several studies debate what is the decisive factor accountable for the development of neurocognitive decay among patients undergoing brain irradiation for MBM: radiation effect on clinically healthy brain tissue or intracranial tumor burden? The answer to this question may come from the recent technological advancement that allows, in a context of a significant time saving, improved patient comfort and minimizing radiation dose to off-target brain, a selective treatment of MBM simultaneously, otherwise attackable only by WBI. The achievement of a local control rate comparable to that obtained with WBI remains the fundamental prerequisite., Trial Registration: NCT number: NCT04891471., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2021 The Author(s).)