Search

Here, we present the successful application of two different preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) methods for a couple facing the genetic risk of Achondroplasia (ACH). The first preimplantation genetic haplotyping (PGH) cycle was based on short tandem repeats (STRs) and 8 STRs were chosen. The multiple displacement amplification (MDA) products were analyzed using the informative STR loci and PCR-restriction enzyme digestion of FGFR3. A healthy girl was delivered. Two years later, we performed the second PGT-M cycle for this couple with a newly established PGT-M platform based on next generation sequencing (NGS). Haplotype analysis was established by a selection of several informative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was also performed on embryos with normal FGFR3 genotype. Another healthy girl was born. PGH system could be established using STRs or NGS-SNP systems. The NGS-SNP system could detect more sites and simultaneously performs PGT-A with an automated operation.

This article aims to inform about the current practices in Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) from a United Kingdom perspective. Progress in the field has been marked over the last decade and new techniques have superseded traditional analysis. The review moves from governance and data collection for PGD to the patient journey. We discuss embryo biopsy and the challenges of analysis when starting with a small amount of DNA. Segments are introduced which introduce basic principles to allow better appreciation of the tests and when they should be applied. We discuss PGD for single gene disorders by preimplantation genetic haplotyping, including for autosomal dominant de novo mutations. Translocations are also discussed and PGD by microarray analysis. We conclude by considering next generation sequencing with the advantages and challenges this may provide to the field.

Preimplantation genetic testing has been used widely in recent years as a part of assisted reproductive technology (ART) owing to the breakthrough development of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing. With the advancement of technology and increased resolution of next generation sequencing (NGS), extensive comprehensive chromosome screening along with small clinically significant deletions and duplications can possibly be performed simultaneously. Here, we present a case of rare chromosomal aberrations: 46,XY,dup(15)(q11.2q13),t(16;18)(q23;p11.2), which resulted in a normally developed adult but abnormal gametes leading to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). To our best knowledge, this is the first report of t(16;18) translocation with such a small exchanged segment detected by NGS platform of MiSeq system in simultaneous 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening.

The aim of this study was to determine whether an interchromosomal effect (ICE) occurred in embryos obtained from reciprocal translocation (rcp) and Robertsonian translocation (RT) carriers who were following a preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) with whole chromosome screening with an aCGH and SNP microarray. We also analyzed the chromosomal numerical abnormalities in embryos with aneuploidy in parental chromosomes that were not involved with a translocation and balanced in involved parental translocation chromosomes. This retrospective study included 832 embryos obtained from rcp carriers and 382 embryos from RT carriers that were biopsied in 139 PGD cycles. The control group involved embryos obtained from age-matched patient karyotypes who were undergoing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with non-translocation, and 579 embryos were analyzed in the control group. A single blastomere at the cleavage stage or trophectoderm from a blastocyst was biopsied, and 24-chromosomal analysis with an aCGH/SNP microarray was conducted using the PGD/PGS protocols. Statistical analyses were implemented on the incidences of cumulative aneuploidy rates between the translocation carriers and the control group. Reliable results were obtained from 138 couples, among whom only one patient was a balanced rcp or RT translocation carrier, undergoing PGD testing in our center from January 2012 to June 2014. For day 3 embryos, the aneuploidy rates were 50.7% for rcp carriers and 49.1% for RT carriers, compared with the control group, with 44.8% at a maternal age

Genetic testing of preimplantation embryos promises to prevent monogenic disease in children born to at-risk couples, the transfer of unbalanced embryos to patients carrying a balanced translocation, and the use of aneuploid embryos created during in vitro fertilization. Technologies have evolved from fluorescence in situ hybridization to next-generation-sequencing-based aneuploidy screening and allow for simultaneous testing of multiple genetic abnormalities in a single biopsy. The field has also shifted away from polar body or blastomere biopsy and toward trophectoderm biopsy as the new standard. This review describes the multitude of available platforms and methodologies used in contemporary preimplantation genetic testing.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis was first successfully performed in 1989 as an alternative to prenatal diagnosis for couples at risk of transmitting a genetic or chromosomal abnormality, such as cystic fibrosis, to their child. From embryos generated in vitro, biopsied cells are genetically tested. From the mid-1990s, this technology has been employed as an embryo selection tool for patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation, screening as many chromosomes as possible, in the hope that selecting chromosomally normal embryos will lead to higher implantation and decreased miscarriage rates. This procedure, preimplantation genetic screening, was initially performed using fluorescent in situ hybridisation, but 11 randomised controlled trials of screening using this technique showed no improvement in in vitro fertilisation delivery rates. Progress in genetic testing has led to the introduction of array comparative genomic hybridisation, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening, and three small randomised controlled trials of preimplantation genetic screening using these new techniques indicate a modest benefit. Other trials are still in progress but, regardless of their results, preimplantation genetic screening is now being offered globally. In the near future, it is likely that sequencing will be used to screen the full genetic code of the embryo.

Objective The objective of this study is to demonstrate the accuracy and feasibility of using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array-based preimplantation genetic haplotyping (PGH) in Chinese population, as the currently short tandem repeat method is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Method Six pedigrees with thalassemia who underwent preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University in China were included in this study. In vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles and embryo biopsies were performed in clinics. All embryos were diagnosed using both a polymerase chain reaction-based method with short tandem repeat and an SNP-based PGH (SNP microarray) method blindly. Results SNP-based PGH was successfully conducted for six pedigrees. Our result was concordant with the initial diagnosis based on the mutation detection (96.4%) and human leukocyte antigen matching (100%). All of the embryos detected to be suitable for IVF with PGH were also diagnosed as suitable using initial methods. Conclusion This simple SNP-based PGH method offers simultaneous haplotyping and human leukocyte antigen matching, which facilitates the determination of optimal embryos for IVF with high accuracy. Further studies are needed to help improve this method into clinic utility. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the minimum number of blastocysts for biopsy to increase the likelihood of obtaining at least one normal/balanced embryo in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for translocation carriers. Methods This blinded retrospective study included 55 PGD cycles for Robertsonian translocation (RT) and 181 cycles for reciprocal translocation (rcp) to indicate when only one of the couples carried a translocation. Single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray after trophectoderm biopsy was performed. Results Reliable results were obtained for 355/379 (93.7 %) biopsied blastocysts in RT group and 986/1053 (93.6 %) in rcp group. Mean numbers of biopsied embryos per patient, normal/balanced embryos per patient, and mean normal/balanced embryo rate per patient were 7.4, 3.1, and 40.7 % in RT group and 8.0, 2.1, and 27.3 %, respectively, in rcp group. In a regression model, three factors significantly affected the number of genetically transferrable embryos: number of biopsied embryos (P = 0.001), basal FSH level (P = 0.040), and maternal age (P = 0.027). ROC analysis with a cutoff of 1.5 was calculated for the number of biopsied embryos required to obtain at least one normal/balanced embryo for RT carriers. For rcp carriers, the cutoff was 3.5. The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 44.2 and 42.6 % in RT and rcp groups (P = 0.836). Conclusions The minimum numbers of blastocysts to obtain at least one normal/balanced embryo for RT and rcp were 2 and 4 under the conditions of female age

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a highly specialized process which involves using assisted reproductive techniques for a couple to increase their chances of having a child that is unaffected by a serious known genetic disorder. It requires a multidisciplinary team of professionals comprising specialists in both assisted reproduction and genetics. Before a decision by a couple to undergo PGD treatment, the counsellor needs to assess their situation, discuss their genetic risk and the process of PGD including the advantages and disadvantages while taking into account the emotional, practical and financial issues. This should enable the couple to make an informed decision about whether PGD is the most appropriate treatment for them. Counselling opportunities arise during and after a treatment cycle ensuring that couples are supported and fully aware of the implications of decisions that need to be made at each stage of the process. Key concepts: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis involves using assisted reproductive techniques to obtain embryos which are then tested for a known genetic condition, before transfer to the uterus. Assisted reproductive techniques used in PGD involve artificially stimulating the ovaries to release large numbers of eggs which are collected and then fertilized using in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm insertion (ICSI). Genetic counselling is a communication process that is associated with the occurrence or risk of a genetic disorder in the family. FISH analysis – fluorescent in situ hybridization is a cytogenetic technique used to detect and localize the presence or absence of specific DNA sequences on chromosomes. It uses fluorescent probes that bind to those parts of the chromosome that show a high degree of sequence similarity. Preimplantation genetic haplotyping (PGH) involves taking a single cell and extracting DNA, which is then amplified before being used for DNA fingerprinting. PGH can be used where the exact mutation is not known or cannot be identified, as the technique scans for the presence of the genetic haplotype, which is associated with the familial disease gene region. Keywords: preimplantation genetic diagnosis; assisted conception; genetic disorder; genetic counselling; molecular and cytogenetic testing

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome is an inherited cancer-susceptibility syndrome with multiple family members with breast cancer or ovarian cancer or both, the presence of both breast cancer and ova-rian cancer in a single individual, and early age of breast cancer onset. BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor suppressor gene mutations are responsible for the vast majority of inheritance of breast and ovarian cancers. App-roximately 10% of ovarian cancer patients and approximately 3-5% of breast cancer patients have predomi-nating BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is an alternative to conventional prenatal diagnostic techniques such as amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. Prenatal diagnosis for BRCA mutation in an ongoing pregnancy and pregnancy termination brings some ethical and psychological questions together. Hence, it may be favorable to perform PGD for patients with BRCA muta-tions. Eventually, PGD may be recommended at least to the infertile patients with BRCA mutation who sho-uld already undergo in vitro ifertilization IVF (in vitro fertilization).

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening (PGD-A) is an early method to detect aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos. The embryos diagnosed as chromosomally abnormal will be discarded, while chromosomally normal embryos will be candidates for transfer to the maternal uterus. PGD-A can be offered to patients with an increased risk of having a higher percentage of chromosomally abnormal embryos, with the aim of improving their reproductive outcome. The most common clinical indications for PGD-A include patients with advanced maternal age, recurrent miscarriage, repetitive implantation failures, severe male factor infertility, previous abnormal pregnancy, and good prognosis patients.

Introduction Around 5 to 20% of the population in the provinces of southern China are carriers of β-thalassemia mutations. In our hospital, more than half of couples treated with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) are β-thalassemia carriers. The most common mutations are deletion in β-thalassemia genes (HBA1 and HBA2), including –SEA, -α 3.7, and -α 4.2. Preimplantation genetic haplotyping (PGH) is a powerful technology for PGT-M that can detect allele drop-out (ADO) accurately by detecting numerous linked or unlinked polymorphic markers in DNA segments surrounding the genes of interest. However, there is a lack of normative data references in the selection of linkage sites for disease. Therefore, a mutation-specific haplotype analysis will improve the efficiency of PGT-M for β-thalassemia. Materials & methods A total of 113 couples with β-thalassemia deletion mutations were collected from the Reproductive Medicine Center in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya. A pre-examination validation for PGT-M was performed on these. The SNPs with large difference between reference frequency and alternate frequency in 452 haplotypes with or without three kinds of deletions were filtered out. Candidate sites close to the β-thalassemia genes were selected, upstream and downstream of genes within 1 Mb. Then, the haplotypes model was established with several specific genotypes of SNPs inherited with the mutations. Subsequently, the model was verified to predict the genotypes in another 34 couples after PGT-M. In addition, the ADO ratio of each site in 255 embryos was analyzed. Results Eight candidate SNPs (rs2562164, rs2857997, rs2857998, rs116995933, rs149153770, rs3918352, rs1203977, and rs1203979) were identified for the haplotypes model constructed for different genotypes. SEA-I (GCGTAACA), α3.7-I (AGACGACA) and α4.2-I (AGACGGAT) haplotypes were detected in 92.2%, 50.9%, and 70.8% genotypes with corresponding mutations, respectively. On average, 42.7% sites were able to be used as key SNPs in the verification of another 34 PGT-M cohort haplotypes and genotypes. The SEA-I model was detected in 91.1% of genotypes with –SEA mutation. The α3.7-I model was concordant with 37.5% of genotypes with the -α3.7 mutation. The α4.2-I models were inherited with 87.5% of genotype with the -α4.2 mutation. The average ADO ratio of the eight SNPs in the 255 embryos was 2.3%. Conclusions The haplotype analysis for common β-thalassemia deletion mutations including the eight-site model improves the efficiency of PGT-M in the population of southern China. The establishment of standardized diagnostic procedures and systems can be further extended to other populations for PGT-M in the future.

Translational research is a recent concept, whose main aim is to categorize practical, outcome-oriented research. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a diagnostic method used to determine the human genotype before implantation through artificial insemination. This method is very useful in identifying possible genetic syndromes in fetuses whose parents have a high risk for genetic diseases. There are numerous techniques for performing PGD, like quantitative polymerase chain reaction or array technologies (comparative genomic hybridization arrays or karyomapping), already used for detecting aneuploidy, unbalanced products of parental chromosome rearrangements, deletion or duplication of genetic materials, and so on. Whole genome sequencing could be used in the next years for PGD, as the technique has already become cost-efficient. However, the use of these techniques in clinical practice may pose a series of significant ethical issues. This article we will try to summarize a few ethical issues associated with whole genome sequencing associated with PGD, including positive eugenics, transfer of knowledge, teleology of the newborn baby or commercialization.

BACKGROUND The embryonic genome, including genotypes and haplotypes, contains all the information for preimplantation genetic diagnosis, representing great potential for mendelian disorder carriers to conceive healthy babies. METHODS We developed a strategy to obtain the full embryonic genome for a β-thalassemia–carrier couple to have a healthy second baby. We carried out sequencing for single blastomere cells and the family trio and further developed the analysis pipeline, including recovery of the missing alleles, removal of the majority of errors, and phasing of the embryonic genome. RESULTS The final accuracy for homozygous and heterozygous single-nucleotide polymorphisms reached 99.62% and 98.39%, respectively. The aneuploidies of embryos were detected as well. Based on the comprehensive embryonic genome, we effectively performed whole-genome mendelian disorder diagnosis and human leukocyte antigen matching tests. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective study in a β-thalassemia family demonstrates a method for embryo genome recovery through single-cell sequencing, which permits detection of genetic variations in preimplantation genetic diagnosis. It shows the potential of single-cell sequencing technology in preimplantation genetic diagnosis clinical practices.

Background Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is now widely used to select embryos free of chromosomal copy number variations (CNV) from chromosome balanced translocation carriers. However, it remains a difficulty to distinguish in embryos between balanced and structurally normal chromosomes efficiently. Methods For this purpose, genome wide preimplantation genetic haplotyping (PGH) analysis was utilized based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray. SNPs that are heterozygous in the carrier and, homozygous in the carrier’s partner and carrier’s family member are defined as informative SNPs. The haplotypes including the breakpoint regions, the whole chromosomes involved in the translocation and the corresponding homologous chromosomes are established with these informative SNPs in the couple, reference and embryos. In order to perform this analysis, a reference either a translocation carrier’s family member or one unbalanced embryo is required. The positions of translocation breakpoints are identified by molecular karyotypes of unbalanced embryos. The recombination of breakpoint regions in embryos could be identified. Results Eleven translocation families were enrolled. 68 blastocysts were analyzed, in which 42 were unbalanced or aneuploid and the other 26 were balanced or normal chromosomes. Thirteen embryos were transferred back to patients. Prenatal cytogenetic analysis of amniotic fluid cells was performed. The results predicted by PGH and karyotypes were totally consistent. Conclusions With the successful clinical application, we demonstrate that PGH was a simple, efficient, and popularized method to distinguish between balanced and structurally normal chromosome embryos. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12920-017-0294-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

OBJECTIVES The present study attempted to confirm a method that distinguishes a balanced Robertsonian translocation carrier embryo from a truly normal embryo in parallel with comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS). METHODS Comprehensive chromosome screening was performed in 107 embryos from 11 couples carrying Robertsonian translocations. Among them, embryos from 2 families had been transferred before the diagnosis of translocation, which resulted in successful pregnancies; embryos from the remaining families were transferred after the identification of translocations. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes were acquired on a genome-wide basis, and breakpoint regions and flanking were assessed by establishing haplotypes. The predicted karyotypes from the transferred embryos were confirmed by prenatal diagnosis. RESULTS Among the 9 families finally undergoing translocation diagnosis, the amniotic cell karyotypes of 3 families were concordant with the results predicted by preimplantation genetic haplotyping, revealing a good consistency rate. After CCS, the euploid embryos from 2 other families could not be further detected because of the absence of abnormal embryos as probands. CONCLUSIONS Molecular karyotypes and haplotypes could be established with SNP microarray simultaneously in each embryo. SNP array-based PGT can simultaneously complete the CCS and identify Robertsonian translocation carriers, thus making it possible to prevent Robertsonian translocations from being passed to subsequent generations.

Fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) full-mutation expansion causes fragile X syndrome. Trans-generational fragile X syndrome transmission can be avoided by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). We describe a robust PGD strategy that can be applied to virtually any couple at risk of transmitting fragile X syndrome. This novel strategy utilises whole-genome amplification, followed by triplet-primed polymerase chain reaction (TP-PCR) for robust detection of expanded FMR1 alleles, in parallel with linked multi-marker haplotype analysis of 13 highly polymorphic microsatellite markers located within 1 Mb of the FMR1 CGG repeat, and the AMELX/Y dimorphism for gender identification. The assay was optimised and validated on single lymphoblasts isolated from fragile X reference cell lines, and applied to a simulated PGD case and a clinical in vitro fertilisation (IVF)-PGD case. In the simulated PGD case, definitive diagnosis of the expected results was achieved for all ‘embryos’. In the clinical IVF-PGD case, delivery of a healthy baby girl was achieved after transfer of an expansion-negative blastocyst. FMR1 TP-PCR reliably detects presence of expansion mutations and obviates reliance on informative normal alleles for determining expansion status in female embryos. Together with multi-marker haplotyping and gender determination, misdiagnosis and diagnostic ambiguity due to allele dropout is minimised, and couple-specific assay customisation can be avoided.

Introduction: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening (PGD/PGS) has been applied clinically for >25 years however inherent drawbacks include the necessity to tailor each case to the trait in question, and that technology to detect monogenic and chromosomal disorders respectively is fundamentally different.\ud \ud Areas Covered: The area of preimplantation genetics has evolved over the last 25 years, adapting to changes in technology and the need for more efficient, streamlined diagnoses. Karyomapping allows the determination of inheritance from the (grand)parental haplobocks through assembly of inherited chromosomal segments. The output displays homologous chromosomes, crossovers and the genetic status of the embryos by linkage comparison, as well as chromosomal disorders. It also allows for determination of heterozygous SNP calls, avoiding the risks of allele dropout, a common problem with other PGD techniques. Manuscripts documenting the evolution of preimplantation genetics, especially those investigating technologies that would simultaneously detect monogenic and chromosomal disorders, were selected for review.\ud \ud Expert Commentary: Karyomapping is currently available for detection of single gene disorders; ~1000 clinics worldwide offer it (via ~20 diagnostic laboratories) and ~2500 cases have been performed. Due an inability to detect post-zygotic trisomy reliably however and confounding problems of embryo mosaicism, karyomapping has yet to be applied clinically for detection of chromosome disorders.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), first successfully carried out in humans in the early 1990s, initially involved the PCR sexing of embryos by Y- (and later also X-) chromosome specific detection. Because of the problems relating to misdiagnosis and contamination of this technology however the PCR based test was superseded by a FISH-based approach involving X and Y specific probes. Sexing by FISH heralded translocation screening, which was shortly followed by preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for Aneuploidy. Aneuploidy is widely accepted to be the leading cause of implantation failure in assisted reproductive technology (ART) and a major contributor to miscarriage, especially in women of advanced maternal age. PGS (AKA PGD for aneuploidy PGD-A) has had a chequered history, with conflicting lines of evidence for and against its use. The current practice of trophectoderm biopsy followed by array CGH or next generation sequencing is gaining in popularity however as evidence for its efficacy grows. PGS has the potential to identify viable embryos that can be transferred thereby reducing the chances of traumatic failed IVF cycles, miscarriage or congenital abnormalities and facilitating the quickest time to live birth of chromosomally normal offspring. In parallel to chromosomal diagnoses, technology for PGD has allowed for improvements in accuracy and efficiency of the genetic screening of embryos for monogenic disorders. The number of genetic conditions available for screening has increased since the early days of PGD, with the human fertilization and embryology authority currently licensing 419 conditions in the UK [1]. A novel technique known as karyomapping that involves SNP chip screening and tracing inherited chromosomal haploblocks is now licensed for the PGD detection of monogenic disorders. Its potential for the universal detection of chromosomal and monogenic disorders simultaneously however, has yet to be realized.

Background Chromosomal mosaicism is observed as the presence of both euploid and aneuploid cells in a particular blastocyst. Recent studies have reported that the implantation rate of mosaic embryo transfer is remarkably lower than the euploid embryos. The superior capability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect chromosomal mosaicism in preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) remains controversial, and several data displayed similar implantation and pregnancy rates using NGS or array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Results In this study, the main inconsistency of aneuploidy detection and clinical performance between the NGS and aCGH were assessed. The phase I consisted of a parallel comparison in 182 blastocysts from 45 selected PGS patients for both the NGS and aCGH platforms. The phase II retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of 90 patients with NGS-screened euploid embryo transfer to that of 129 patients with aCGH-screened euploid embryo transfer. The parallel comparison showed that the inconsistency of embryo euploidy was 11.8% (p = 0.01). Chromosomal mosaicism (10.7% with NGS vs. 3.9% with aCGH) and segmental aneuploidy (10.7% with NGS vs. 6.7% with aCGH) contributed to the discrepancy mainly. The chromosomally mosaic embryos (20%–50% of aneuploidy) and several embryos with segmental aneuploidy (≥10 Mbp) were hard to distinguish using the aCGH platform, but could be clearly identified using the NGS platform. After the first euploid embryo cryotransfer, the β-HCG(+) rate and implantation rate significantly increased in the PGS/NGS patients (HCG[+] rate: 73.3% in PGS/NGS vs. 60.5% in PGS/aCGH, p = 0.048; implantation rate: 53.2% in PGS/NGS vs. 45.0% in PGS/aCGH, p = 0.043). The clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates appeared higher in the NGS group, but did not reached statistical significance. Conclusions The results demonstrated that the NGS platform can identify embryos with chromosomal mosaicism and segmental aneuploidy more precisely than the aCGH platform, and the following clinical performance of NGS was more favorable.

STUDY QUESTION: How to select and prioritize embryos during PGD following genome-wide haplotyping? SUMMARY ANSWER: In addition to genetic disease-specific information, the embryo selected for transfer is based on ranking criteria including the existence of mitotic and/or meiotic aneuploidies, but not carriership of mutations causing recessive disorders. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Embryo selection for monogenic diseases has been mainly performed using targeted disease-specific assays. Recently, these targeted approaches are being complemented by generic genome-wide genetic analysis methods such as karyomapping or haplarithmisis, which are based on genomic haplotype reconstruction of cell(s) biopsied from embryos. This provides not only information about the inheritance of Mendelian disease alleles but also about numerical and structural chromosome anomalies and haplotypes genome-wide. Reflections on how to use this information in the diagnostic laboratory are lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We present the results of the first 101 PGD cycles (373 embryos) using haplarithmisis, performed in the Centre for Human Genetics, UZ Leuven. The questions raised were addressed by a multidisciplinary team of clinical geneticist, fertility specialists and ethicists. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Sixty-three couples enrolled in the genome-wide haplotyping-based PGD program. Families presented with either inherited genetic variants causing known disorders and/or chromosomal rearrangements that could lead to unbalanced translocations in the offspring. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Embryos were selected based on the absence or presence of the disease allele, a trisomy or other chromosomal abnormality leading to known developmental disorders. In addition, morphologically normal Day 5 embryos were prioritized for transfer based on the presence of other chromosomal imbalances and/or carrier information. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Some of the choices made and principles put forward are specific for cleavage-stage-based genetic testing. The proposed guidelines are subject to continuous update based on the accumulating knowledge from the implementation of genome-wide methods for PGD in many different centers world-wide as well as the results of ongoing scientific research. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our embryo selection principles have a profound impact on the organization of PGD operations and on the information that is transferred among the genetic unit, the fertility clinic and the patients. These principles are also important for the organization of pre- and post-counseling and influence the interpretation and reporting of preimplantation genotyping results. As novel genome-wide approaches for embryo selection are revolutionizing the field of reproductive genetics, national and international discussions to set general guidelines are warranted. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The European Union's Research and Innovation funding programs FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IAPP SARM: 324509 and Horizon 2020 WIDENLIFE: 692065 to J.R.V., T.V., E.D. and M.Z.E. J.R.V., T.V. and M.Z.E. have patents ZL910050-PCT/EP2011/060211-WO/2011/157846 ('Methods for haplotyping single cells') with royalties paid and ZL913096-PCT/EP2014/068315-WO/2015/028576 ('Haplotyping and copy-number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies') with royalties paid, licensed to Cartagenia (Agilent technologies). J.R.V. also has a patent ZL91 2076-PCT/EP20 one 3/070858 ('High throughout genotyping by sequencing') with royalties paid. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A. ispartof: Human Reproduction vol:32 issue:3 pages:687-697 ispartof: location:England status: published

The aim of the study is to report a case of non-diagnosed complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) identified by preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) followed by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) which resulted in a pregnancy and delivery of healthy offspring. A 29-year-old woman and her spouse, both diagnosed previously with normal karyotypes, approached our IVF-PGD center following eight early spontaneous miscarriages. PGS using chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was performed on biopsied trophectoderm. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as well as re-karyotype, were performed on metaphase derived from peripheral blood of the couple. Subsequently, in the following PGD cycle, a total of seven blastocysts underwent CMA. A gain or loss at three chromosomes (3, 7, 9) was identified in six out of seven embryos in the first PGS-CMA cycle. FISH analysis of parental peripheral blood samples demonstrated that the male is a carrier of a CCR involving those chromosomes; this was in spite of a former diagnosis of normal karyotypes for both parents. Re-karyotype verified the complex translocation of 46,XY,t (3;7;9)(q23;q22;q22). Subsequently, in the following cycle, a total of seven blastocysts underwent PGD-CMA for the identified complex translocation. Two embryos were diagnosed with balanced chromosomal constitution. A single balanced embryo was transferred and pregnancy was achieved, resulting in the birth of a healthy female baby. PGS employing CMA is an efficient method to detect unrevealed chromosomal abnormalities, including complicated cases of CCR. The combined application of array CGH and FISH technologies enables the identification of an increased number of CCR carriers for which PGD is particularly beneficial.

INTRODUCTION: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was introduced as an alternative to prenatal diagnosis: embryos cultured in vitro were analysed for a monogenic disease and only disease-free embryos were transferred to the mother, to avoid the termination of pregnancy with an affected foetus. It soon transpired that human embryos show a great deal of acquired chromosomal abnormalities, thought to explain the low success rate of IVF - hence preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was developed to select euploid embryos for transfer. Areas covered: PGD has followed the tremendous evolution in genetic analysis, with only a slight delay due to adaptations for diagnosis on small samples. Currently, next generation sequencing combining chromosome with single-base pair analysis is on the verge of becoming the golden standard in PGD and PGT-A. Papers highlighting the different steps in the evolution of PGD/PGT-A were selected. Expert commentary: Different methodologies used in PGD/PGT-A with theirpros and cons are discussed.

There have been great advances in molecular screening and diagnostic techniques in the field of assisted reproductive technology and many of these advances have come in the field of reproductive genetics. Broadly, preimplantation genetic diagnostics can be utilized to identify a normal embryo amongst those which contain a single gene disorder (preimplantation genetic diagnosis—PGD) or can be utilized to identify embryos that have gained or are missing large segments of DNA or whole chromosomes (preimplantation genetic screening—PGS ). Both PGD and PGS have a wide variety of applications and can used to identify embryos which have the highest potential of forming a normal, healthy offspring. There are challenges in this process including safely obtaining genetic material in the form of an embryo biopsy as well as appropriately and accurate application of amplification and analysis strategies. With the advent of proper validation and utilization, both PGD and PGS have been shown to be useful in improving reproductive outcomes and will be discussed in this chapter.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) gives couples who have a high risk of transmitting genetic disorders to their baby the chance to have a healthy offspring through embryo genetic analysis and selection. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is an effective method to select euploid embryos that may prevent repeated implantation failure or miscarriage. However, how and to whom PGS should be provided is a controversial topic. The first successful case of PGD of a human being was reported in 1990, and there have been tremendous improvements in this technology since then. Both embryo biopsy and genetic technologies have been improved dramatically, which increase the accuracy and expand the indications of PGD/PGS.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis is a procedure that involves the removal of one or more nuclei from oocytes (a polar body) or embryos (blastomeres or trophectoderm cells) in order to test for problems in genome sequence or chromosomes of the embryo prior to implantation. It provides new hope of having unaffected children, as well as avoiding the necessity of terminating an affected pregnancy for genetic parents who carry an affected gene or have balanced chromosomal status. Polymerase chain reaction-based molecular techniques are the methods used to detect gene defects with a known sequence and X-linked diseases. The indication for using this approach has expanded for couples who are prevented from having babies because they carry a serious genetic disorder to couples with conditions that are not immediately life threatening, such as cancer predisposition genes and Huntington disease. In addition, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has been widely applied for the detection of chromosome abnormalities. FISH allows the evaluation of many chromosomes at the same time, up to 15 chromosome pairs in a single cell. Preimplantation genetic screening, defined as a test that screens for aneuploidy, has been most commonly used in situations of advanced maternal age, a history of recurrent miscarriage, a history of repeated implantation failure, or a severe male factor. Unfortunately, randomized controlled trials have as yet shown no benefit with respect to preimplantation genetic screening using cleavage stage biopsy, which is probably attributable to the high levels of mosaicism at early cleavage stages and the limitations of FISH. Recently, two main types of array-based technology combined with whole genome amplification have been developed for use in preimplantation genetic diagnosis; these are comparative genomic hybridization and single nucleotide polymorphism-based arrays. Both allow the analysis of all chromosomes, and the latter also allows the haplotype of the sample to be determined. The promising results of these two approaches will inspire further validation of these array platforms, even at the single-cell level. It remains to be decided which embryo stage is the best for biopsy. Moreover, if randomized controlled trials are confirmed to play a role in increasing delivery rates, this will be a major step forward for assisted reproductive technology patients around the world.

Determining a genetic diagnosis prenatally permits patients to make informed reproductive decisions and to be counseled about possible fetal outcomes. Therefore, it is important for the provider to be aware of the spectrum of genetic conditions and to use appropriate testing modality to obtain specific diagnosis. This article reviews genetic techniques available for prenatal diagnosis such as preimplantation genetic testing, chromosomal microarray, non-invasive prenatal screening, and next-generation sequencing. Chromosomal microarray has emerged as the first diagnostic test for evaluation of multiple congenital anomalies and developmental delay as most of the next-generation sequencing methods do not detect copy-number variants (CNVs). Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing are time-consuming, so if this needs to be done to obtain an accurate genetic diagnosis, allow sufficient time.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows patients who are carriers or who are affected by genetic diseases to select unaffected embryos for transfer before becoming pregnant. The practice of PGD is evolving with rapid advances in technology and biopsy methods. Testing for a specific gene mutation can be performed in combination with 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening. Several unique applications of PGD are reviewed, including exclusion diagnosis for couples from Huntington disease families, testing for fragile X premutations, and human leukocyte antigen matching for stem cell donor siblings. Although PGD for single gene mutations allows patients to gain information about their embryos and perhaps avoid a difficult decision about whether or not to terminate an ongoing pregnancy, this technique also provides for much ethical debate encompassing the well-being of the prospective couple, embryo, child, and people in the community affected by the diseases being screened.

Essentials Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of severe hemophilia A relies on linkage analysis. Simultaneous multi-marker screening can simplify selection of informative markers in a couple. We developed a single-tube tetradecaplex panel of polymorphic markers for hemophilia A PGD use. Informative markers can be used for linkage analysis alone or combined with mutation detection. SummaryBackground It is currently not possible to perform single-cell preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to directly detect the common inversion mutations of the factor VIII (F8) gene responsible for severe hemophilia A (HEMA). As such, PGD for such inversion carriers relies on indirect analysis of linked polymorphic markers. Objectives To simplify linkage-based PGD of HEMA, we aimed to develop a panel of highly polymorphic microsatellite markers located near the F8 gene that could be simultaneously genotyped in a multiplex-PCR reaction. Methods We assessed the polymorphism of various microsatellite markers located ≤ 1 Mb from F8 in 177 female subjects. Highly polymorphic markers were selected for co-amplification with the AMELX/Y indel dimorphism in a single-tube reaction. Results Thirteen microsatellite markers located within 0.6 Mb of F8 were successfully co-amplified with AMELX/Y in a single-tube reaction. Observed heterozygosities of component markers ranged from 0.43 to 0.84, and ∼70–80% of individuals were heterozygous for ≥ 5 markers. The tetradecaplex panel successfully identified fully informative markers in a couple interested in PGD for HEMA because of an intragenic F8 point mutation, with haplotype phasing established through a carrier daughter. In-vitro fertilization (IVF)-PGD involved single-tube co-amplification of fully informative markers with AMELX/Y and the mutation-containing F8 amplicon, followed by microsatellite analysis and amplicon mutation-site minisequencing analysis. Conclusions The single-tube multiplex-PCR format of this highly polymorphic microsatellite marker panel simplifies identification and selection of informative markers for linkage-based PGD of HEMA. Informative markers can also be easily co-amplified with mutation-containing F8 amplicons for combined mutation detection and linkage analysis.

We successfully performed preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and simultaneous preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays for couples with balanced chromosome rearrangements in China. A total of 428 molecular karyotypes were diagnosed from 62 couples undergoing 68 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Of these, 48.1% of the embryos were chromosomally normal without translocation errors or aneuploidy. Of the 428 total embryos, 18.0% embryos were euploid, but were imbalanced due to the transmission of single translocation chromosome derivatives. A total of 6.5% of the embryos had chromosome abnormalities involving the parental chromosome aberration and other chromosomes aneuploidies. Significantly, 27.4% of the embryos were normal/balanced for the rearranged chromosomes, but were abnormal due to aneuploidy affecting other chromosomes. When evaluated on a per IVF cycle basis, 84% of the cycles had at least one chromosomally normal embryo available for uterine transfer. The clinical pregnancy rate per IVF cycle was 54%. Diagnosing genomically balanced embryos through 24 chromosome SNP microarray PGD/PGS, rather than minimally targeted fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), is a promising strategy to maximize the pregnancy potential of patients with known parental chromosomal translocations. Moreover, this is the first study to report the clinical application of SNP arrays to screen all 24 chromosome pairs of blastomeres and trophectoderm cells from patients carrying reciprocal translocations in China.

Development of PGD assays for molecular disorders is based on analysis of a familial mutation together with linked polymorphic STR markers; a process which is lengthy and requires the identification of multiple informative markers prior to PGD analysis. On the other hand, whole genome amplification (WGA), in conjunction with microarray platforms, allows the use of a universal assay for the analysis of a very large number of SNP markers at once. The aim of this study was to test high throughput pre-PGD familial haplotyping for in-case blastomere analysis in order to eliminate time-consuming pre-case preparations for each family.A PGD cycle was performed for a couple with paternal Charcot Marie Tooth 1A (CMT1A) using a classic multiplex nested PCR approach. Mutant embryos from the case were blindly reanalyzed, as single or multi-cell biopsies, using a multiple displacement amplification-based WGA protocol and microarray SNP analysis. In parallel, relevant genomic DNA samples from the family were also analyzed by SNP microarray.After applying a 'unique informative allele' selection algorithm to the data, this array-based assay reconfirmed the initial diagnosis in all samples.We describe a PGD method that is both accurate and feasible during the time-frame required for embryo transfer. This strategy greatly reduces the time for pre-case haplotype preparation.

This Timeline article reviews the evolution of both prenatal and pre-implantation genetic testing, from their historic origins to ongoing development and implementation of tools for genome-wide single-cell and cell-free fetal DNA analysis. Future developments and some of the ethical issues that arise from these new technologies are also discussed. The past decade has seen the development of technologies that have revolutionized prenatal genetic testing; that is, genetic testing from conception until birth. Genome-wide single-cell arrays and high-throughput sequencing analyses are dramatically increasing our ability to detect embryonic and fetal genetic lesions, and have substantially improved embryo selection for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Moreover, both invasive and non-invasive mutation scanning of the genome are helping to identify the genetic causes of prenatal developmental disorders. These advances are changing clinical practice and pose novel challenges for genetic counselling and prenatal care.

International audience

The purpose of this study was to apply next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to identify chromosomally normal embryos for transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) cycles for translocations. A total of 21 translocation couples with a history of infertility and repeated miscarriage presented at our PGD clinic for 24-chromosome embryo testing using copy number variation sequencing (CNV-Seq). Testing of 98 embryo samples identified 68 aneuploid (69.4 %) and 30 (30.6 %) euploid embryos. Among the aneuploid embryos, the most common abnormalities were segmental translocation imbalances, followed by whole autosomal trisomies and monosomies, segmental imbalances of non-translocation chromosomes, and mosaicism. In all unbalanced embryos resulting from reciprocal translocations, CNV-Seq precisely identified both segmental imbalances, extending from the predicted breakpoints to the chromosome termini. From the 21 PGD cycles, eight patients had all abnormal embryos and 13 patients had at least one normal/balanced and euploid embryo available for transfer. In nine intrauterine transfer cycles, seven healthy babies have been born. In four of the seven children tested at 18 weeks gestation, the karyotypes matched with the original PGD results. In clinical PGD translocation cycles, CNV-Seq displayed the hallmarks of a comprehensive diagnostic technology for high-resolution 24-chromosome testing of embryos, capable of identifying true euploid embryos for transfer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Embryo assessment is a crucial component to the success of IVF. A high rate of embryos produced in vitro present chromosomal abnormalities and have reduced potential for achieving a viable pregnancy. The use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by array comparative genomic hybridization, for comprehensive aneuploidy screening of embryos, to improve IVF outcomes, is reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Data from comprehensive aneuploidy screening of embryos showed that aneuploidies may occur in any of the 24 chromosomes, indicating that aneuploidy screening of all chromosomes is necessary to determine whether an embryo is chromosomally normal. Initial studies on clinical application of this technology have documented improved pregnancy outcomes following transfer of screened embryos. The optimal stage of preimplantation development at which preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) should be performed still remains to be determined. SUMMARY: Although clinical results have been promising, further evidence is required to establish whether PGS results in enhanced live birth rate, and if this is the case, to identify which patients may benefit from the procedure. The results from several ongoing randomized controlled trials, performed at different cell biopsy stage and categories of patients, will provide the data needed to accept or reject the clinical efficacy of PGS.

This study provides an overview of 13 years of experience of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for Huntington's disease (HD) at three European PGD centres in Brussels, Maastricht and Strasbourg. Information on all 331 PGD intakes for HD, couples' reproductive history, PGD approach, treatment cycles and outcomes between 1995 and 2008 were collected prospectively. Of 331 couples for intake, 68% requested direct testing and 32% exclusion testing (with a preponderance of French couples). At the time of PGD intake, 39% of women had experienced one or more pregnancies. A history of pregnancy termination after prenatal diagnosis was observed more frequently in the direct testing group (25%) than in the exclusion group (10%; P=0.0027). PGD workup was based on two approaches: (1) direct testing of the CAG-triplet repeat and (2) linkage analysis using intragenic or flanking microsatellite markers of the HTT gene. In total, 257 couples had started workup and 174 couples (70% direct testing, 30% exclusion testing) completed at least one PGD cycle. In total, 389 cycles continued to oocyte retrieval (OR). The delivery rates per OR were 19.8%, and per embryo transfer 24.8%, resulting in 77 deliveries and the birth of 90 children. We conclude that PGD is a valuable and safe reproductive option for HD carriers and couples at risk of transmitting HD. European Journal of Human Genetics (2012) 20, 368-375; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.202; published online 9 November 2011

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was introduced more than 20 years ago and represents an established clinical procedure in assisted reproduction and genetic practices. This is now a reality that couples at genetic risk have a practical option to reproduce with less fear of producing offspring with genetic disorders. PGD has presently been applied to more than 220 different genetic disorders, with an over 99% accuracy rate in leading PGD centers. Its application has been expanding beyond traditional indications and includes some conditions determined by de novo mutations, common disorders with genetic predisposition, and HLA typing – with or without testing for causative genes. Despite recent controversy regarding the usefulness of PGD for assisted reproduction, the current developments in aneuploidy testing by microarray technology may improve preimplantation aneuploidy testing for the preselection of embryos with higher developmental potential, which is still the major challenge in improving IVF. ...

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is an alternative to prenatal diagnosis (PND) giving couples at risk a chance to start a pregnancy with a disease-free baby. This study aimed to develop a new PGD protocol for alpha-thalassemia(-SEA) mutation, the commonest Mendelian disorder.Multiplex fluorescent PCR was employed for mutation, contamination and linkage analysis. A couple experienced termination of pregnancy following positive PND decided to join the project.Novel primers for alpha-thalassemia(-SEA) mutation amplifying 5 DNA fragments were developed. Two PGD cycles were performed, resulting in an un-affected baby. PND confirmed the heterozygous result. From 24 embryos, 87.5% of affected genotype were of best quality compared to 0% and 18.2% of those with normal and heterozygous, respectively.A novel PCR protocol for the common alpha-thalassemia(-SEA) mutation is reported. This test should be widely applicable. Interestingly, a potential effect of alpha-thalassemia(-SEA) mutation on preimplantation embryonic development was noticed.

�Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is gradually widely used in prevention of gene diseases and chromosomal abnormalities. Much improvement has been achieved in biopsy technique and molecular diagnosis. Blastocyst biopsy can increase diagnostic accuracy and reduce allele dropout. It is cost-effective and currently plays an important role. Whole genome amplification permits subsequent individual detection of multiple gene loci and screening all 23 pairs of chromosomes. For PGD of chromosomal translocation, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) is traditionally used, but with technical difficulty. Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) can detect translocation and 23 pairs of chro mosomes that may replace FISH. Single nucleotide polymorphisms array with haplotyping can further distinguish between normal chromosomes and balanced translocation. PGD may shorten time to conceive and reduce miscarriage for patients with chromosomal translocation. PGD has a potential value for mitochondrial diseases. Preimplantation genetic haplotyping has been applied for unknown mutation sites of single gene disease. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) using limited FISH probes in the cleavage-stage embryo did not increase live birth rates for patients with advanced maternal age, unexplained recurrent abortions, and repeated implantation failure. Polar body and blastocyst biopsy may circumvent the problem of mosaicism. PGS using blastocyst biopsy and array CGH is encouraging and merit further studies. Cryopreservation of biopsied blastocysts instead of fresh transfer permits sufficient time for transportation and genetic analysis. Cryopreserva tion of embryos may avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and possible suboptimal endometrium.

Congenital hyperinsulinism is the most common cause of persistent hypoglycaemia in infancy. Early surgical intervention is usually required to prevent brain damage. The prevention of the transmission to the offspring is important in families carrying the mutated gene. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is an early genetic testing procedure for couples at risk of transmitting inherited diseases. A 36-year-old Saudi woman married to her first cousin with four affected children was referred for PGD. The hyperinsulinism disease was caused by a novel homozygous mutation in the KCNJ11 gene, an arginine 301 to proline (R301P) substitution.PGD was achieved by whole genome amplification followed by mutation detection combined with short tandem repeat identifier analysis in the first cycle and with haplotyping in the second cycle. The first and second cycles resulted in the births of healthy twin girls and a boy, respectively. As far as is known, this is the first application of PGD to hyperinsulinism. A feasible strategy including whole genome amplification followed by direct mutation detection combined with haplotyping is described.Utilizing haplotyping increases the efficiency of PGD diagnosis as well as confirming the genetic diagnosis. It reveals the parental origin of each inherited chromosome.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis using fluorescence in-situ hybridization (PGD-FISH) is currently the most common reproductive solution for translocation carriers. However, this technique usually does not differentiate between embryos carrying the balanced form of the translocation and those carrying the homologous normal chromosomes. We developed a new application of preimplantation genetic haplotyping (PGH) that can identify and distinguish between all forms of the translocation status in cleavage stage embryos prior to implantation.Polymorphic markers were used to identify and differentiate between the alleles that carry the translocation and those that are the normal homologous chromosomes.Embryos from two families of robertsonian translocation carriers were successfully analyzed using polymorphic markers haplotyping.Our preliminary results indicate that the PGH is capable of distinguishing between normal, balanced and unbalanced translocation carrier embryos. This method will improve PGD and will enable translocation carriers to avoid transmission of the translocation and the associated medical complications to offspring.

More than 60% of cleavage-stage and 50% of blastocyst-stage embryos are chromosomally abnormal. Morphological selection cannot discern most of these abnormalities, thus preimplantation genetic diagnosis has been used to screen for their presence. Conflicting results have been obtained using FISH and cleavage-stage biopsy, mostly owing to differences in methodology. When using appropriate preimplantation genetic diagnosis techniques, preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly increases implantation rates and reduces spontaneous abortion rates in patients with advanced maternal age or recurrent pregnancy loss. Newer techniques such as comparative genome hybridization, array comparative genome hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays can analyze all chromosome aneuploidies, and preliminary results indicate significant improvement on assisted reproductive technologies results, especially when coupled with blastocyst biopsy.

The availability of assisted reproductive technologies and advances in molecular biology gave rise to preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). PGD is an early form of prenatal diagnosis and determines the genotype of an embryo before implantation takes place to avoid the implantation of diseased embryos. This requires couples to adhere to a strict family planning and effective contraceptive strategy, and undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. During IVF, sampling of the cells can be performed at different developmental stages from polar body biopsy to trophectoderm cells from the blastocysts. It is indicated in couples with a family history of monogenic autosomal or X-linked recessive or dominant disorders and in detecting chromosomal aberrations of the embryos. The genetic diagnosis is performed using appropriate molecular testing which might include polymerase chain reaction, fluorescent in situ hybridization, comparative genomic hybridization or microarrays. PGD is now a well-established procedure and offers an alternative reproductive choice for couples who are at risk of an affected child. In this review, the past, present and future aspect of PGD will be covered.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis using whole genome amplification and a haplotyping approach (PGH) was first described in 2006 and suggested as an efficient alternative to single-cell PCR for monogenic disorders. DNA from single cells was amplified using multiple displacement amplification; the resulting products were then tested using disease-specific PCR multiplexes applied under standard laboratory conditions to determine the haplotypes in the embryo. This study reports on a total of 127 completed biopsy cycles for 101 couples at risk of: autosomal recessive disease (71 cycles, 53 couples including one germ-line mosaic carrier), autosomal dominant disease (31 cycles, 26 couples including one germ-line mosaic carrier), X-linked recessive disease (18 cycles, 16 couples including one germ-line mosaic carrier), X-linked dominant disease (six cycles, five couples) and a double inheritance of both autosomal and X-linked recessive diseases (one cycle, one couple). Of these, 107 cycles reached embryo transfer. Overall success rates were: fetal heart beat-positive pregnancies (FHB+)/biopsy cycle = 28%; FHB+/embryo transfer = 34%; FHB+/couple = 36%; 26 babies born, 13 ongoing pregnancies. These data demonstrate that PGH provides a robust, efficient and successful alternative to single-cell PCR for monogenic diseases.

Summary Background Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa (HJEB) is a severe, life-threatening, autosomal recessive blistering skin disease for which no cure is currently available. Prenatal diagnosis for couples at risk is feasible through fetal skin biopsy or analysis of DNA extracted from chorionic villi, but these methods can be applied only after pregnancy has been established. An alternative approach, which involves the analysis of single cells from embryos prior to establishment of pregnancy, is preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Until now, its clinical uptake has been hindered by lengthy delays in establishing mutation-specific protocols, and by the small amount of template DNA that can be obtained from a single cell. A new method that addresses these problems, preimplantation genetic haplotyping (PGH), relies on whole genome amplification followed by haplotyping of multiple polymorphic markers using standard DNA-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Objectives To design and validate a generic PGH assay for HJEB and to transfer this into clinical practice. Materials and methods We established a multiplex PCR-based PGH assay involving 16 markers within and flanking the LAMB3 gene (the most frequently mutated gene in HJEB). The assay was then validated in 10 families with at least one previously affected offspring. After licensing by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), the new test was used for PGD in a couple at risk of HJEB. Results The chromosome 1 LAMB3 markers within the assay were shown to be of sufficient heterogeneity to have widespread application for preimplantation testing of HJEB. In one couple that were heterozygous carriers of nonsense mutations in LAMB3, we used the new assay to identify unaffected embryos in a series of PGD cycles. Pregnancy was established in the third PGD cycle and a healthy, unaffected child was born. DNA analysis of cord blood confirmed the predicted single-cell mutation status of wild-type LAMB3 alleles. Conclusions PGH represents a major step forward in widening the scope and availability of preimplantation testing for serious mapped single-gene disorders. We have established a generic test that is suitable for the majority of couples at risk of HJEB.

background: Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) has been used in an attempt to determine embryonic aneuploidy. Techniques that use new molecular methods to determine the karyotype of an embryo are expanding the scope of PGS. methods: We introduce a new method for PGS, termed ‘parental support’, which leverages microarray measurements from parental DNA to ‘clean’ single-cell microarray measurements on embryonic cells and explicitly computes confidence in each copy number call. The method distinguishes mitotic and meiotic copy errors and determines parental source of aneuploidy. results: Validation with 459 single cells of known karyotype indicated that per-cell false-positive and false-negative rates are roughly equivalent to the ‘gold standard’ metaphase karyotype. The majority of the cells were run in parallel with a clinical commercial PGS service. Computed confidences were conservative and roughly concordant with accuracy. To examine ploidy in human embryos, the method was then applied to 26 disaggregated, cryopreserved, cleavage-stage embryos for a total of 134 single blastomeres. Only 23.1% of the embryos were euploid, though 46.2% of embryos were mosaic euploid. Mosaicism affected 57.7% of the embryos. Counts of mitotic and meiotic errors were roughly equivalent. Maternal meiotic trisomy predominated over paternal trisomy, and maternal meiotic trisomies were negatively predictive of mosaic euploid embryos. conclusions: We have performed a major preclinical validation of a new method for PGS and found that the technology performs approximately as well as a metaphase karyotype. We also directly measured the mechanism of aneuploidy in cleavage-stage human embryos and found high rates and distinct patterns of mitotic and meiotic aneuploidy.