1.Introduction Human thought is rooted in systematic principles and structures, essential not only for intellectual and scientific accomplishments, but also for a more enriching human life. The existing social system, the order in interactions among people, and the development of various sciences are all outcomes of these structures. Another instance of these structures can be found in works of art, especially in literature. Literature, as the most visible layer of thought, has a high capacity to reveal those hidden structures. From this, we can propose the notion that every literary text operates within a discernible framework and structure. In essence, even the most seemingly unstructured literary works are purposefully situated within an underlying structure. This issue can be recovered both in Classical and modern works. Literary works throughout old and modern history consistently follow a format that includes a preface, body, and conclusion. Such a process is also established in modern narratives, and it is expressed in three structures: Begining, Climax, and Ending. Newer narratives may seem confusing, but they shape the text to fit narrative needs and ideological principles. It is worth noting that the macrostructure consists of structures that can also be divided into microstructures. The microstructures serve as the foundational elements for the triple structures, which ultimately determine the overall structure of the literary work. The upcoming research will concentrate on examining the role of prefaces as an essential component within a systematic whole. This presents an opportunity to shed light on the underlying structure of prefaces in classical Persian prose works. Methodology A descriptive and analytical approach is used to align with the qualitative nature of the research. Within this framework, the focus will be on the general definition of structural thinking rather than a specific theory. At data collection level, the historical approach will be used. In order to achieve accurate results in the study, the Quota Sample has been implemented, taking into account the multitude of prefaces that existed in the classical Iranian Literature. The researchers have submitted five Classical Prose works: Kalla wa-Dimna, Gulistan, Asrar al-Tawhid, Tarikh-e-Jahangushay, and KTmaye-Saadat. Prefaces from a variety of fields have been chosen, including history, scholarship, ethics, and education, to showcase the attributes of theoretical receptivity discussed in the study.. Discussion There is a structure in the prefaces of Persian classical prose works that have managed to remain sustainable despite various historical and social developments. Here we point to three sections of this structure: praise to God, political issues, and motivational factors. All the authors began their work with the praise of God. They praise God for his various attributes. A part of these praises is enumerating various attributes of God. These attributes are selected according to the general content of the work, the author's introverted or extroverted attitude, social conditions and other factors. Abu'l-Ma'ali Nasrollah effectively generates polarization by pitting two distinct groups, "allies" and "enemies," against each other. This creates a dual dynamic that is prevalent in his political discourse. The authors in other parts of the prefaces have paid attention to politics and institutions of power. In other words, in a hierarchical movement, while moving from top to bottom, the authors have moved towards the institution of power as a link between heaven (God and religion) and earth (politics and society). Such an approach, on the one hand, is the result of trying to give legitimacy to the rulers, and on the other hand, trying to immortalize their works by presenting them to the officials. Also, the authors of the Prefaces have paid attention to the motivation factors. Their motivation to write the works is either human or spiritual. Human factors are classified into three categories: First: The group is of lower status than the author, and is evident in the didactic, mystic, or moral prefaces. Second: The author and his friends are equal, which exists in the Preface of Sa'di's Gulistan. Third: Owners of political power, such as the king or the minister, constitute another group of motivation factors. They are in a higher status than the authors. This can be observed in: Kalla wa-Dimna. 4. Conclusion Persian prose works demonstrate a threefold structure, comprised of a Preface, a substantial body, and a conclusion. However, prefaces, as part of this three-part structure, can have a specific and tangible structure. This research shows that the prefaces of various classical Persian prose works, including five under study, follow a similar structured pattern despite differences in genre. There are some variations in the components, but the overall macrostructure remains the same. They are limited or expanded according to the author's mental postures, the perspective of the work and some other metatextual or intertextual factors. The mentioned structural pattern is composed of nine elements, which can be generalized in other Persian prose works. These nine elements have acted as a guiding force for authors in the creation of their works prefaces. From a more structuralist perspective, the constructions of prefaces can be summarized in three macrostructures titled "other", "self", "other". On the other hand, the existence of a single structure that is hidden in the prefaces of Persian prose texts means that the author of the prose text was faced with a limited and predetermined framework in writing the preface, and he had to perform artistic and literary innovation within this assumed framework. find, an issue that, while challenging the literary abilities of the authors, reveals the extent of their artistic ability and literary innovation within a framework. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]