Search

This study explores how select microRNAs (miRNAs) influence bone structure in humans and in transgenic mice. In trabecular bone biopsies from 84 postmenopausal women (healthy, osteopenic, and osteoporotic), we demonstrate that DLEU2 (deleted in lymphocytic leukemia 2)-encoded miR-15a-5p is strongly positively associated with bone mineral density (BMD) at different skeletal sites. In bone transcriptome analyses, miR-15a-5p levels correlated positively with the osteocyte characteristic transcripts SOST (encoding sclerostin) and MEPE (Matrix Extracellular Phosphoglycoprotein), while the related miR-15b-5p showed a negative association with BMD and osteoblast markers. The data imply that these miRNAs have opposite roles in bone remodeling with distinct actions on bone cells. Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) variants confirmed earlier DLEU2 associations. Furthermore, a novel variant (rs12585295) showed high localization with transcriptionally active chromatin states in osteoblast primary cell cultures. The supposition that DLEU2 -encoded miRNAs have an important regulatory role in bone remodeling was further confirmed in a transgenic mice model showing that miR-15a/16-1 -deleted mice had significantly higher percentage bone volume and trabecular number than the wild type, possibly due to prenatal actions. However, the three-point mechanical break force test of mice femurs showed a positive correlation between strength and miR-15a-5p/miR-16-5p levels, indicating differential effects on cortical and trabecular bone. Moreover, these miRNAs appear to have distinct and complex actions in mice prenatally and in adult humans, impacting BMD and microstructure by regulating bone cell transcription. However, detailed interactions between these miRNAs and their downstream mechanisms in health and disease need further clarification.

Men with distal forearm fractures have reduced bone density, an increased risk of osteoporosis and of further fractures. The aim of the study was to investigate the structural determinants of these observations using quantitative CT (qCT). Ninety six men with low-trauma distal forearm fracture and 101 age-matched healthy control subjects were recruited. All subjects underwent a quantitative CT on a standard 64-slice whole body CT scanner. These were analysed on Mindways QCT PRO™ Software to generate volumetric and geometric data at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip, ultra-distal and distal 33 % radius. Biochemical investigations, health questionnaires and measurements of bone turnover were made. Men with fracture had significantly lower total and trabecular vBMD at all sites. The greatest percentage reduction was at the ultra-distal radius (13.5 % total and 11.7 % trabecular vBMD). In the fracture group cortical vBMD was significantly higher in the femoral neck (p < 0.001) and maintained at the ultra-distal radius compared with control subjects. However, cortical cross-sectional area (CSA) and thickness were significantly reduced at the femoral neck (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002 respectively) and forearm sites (CSA ultradistal radius p = 0.001, cortical thickness p = 0.002, CSA distal one third radius p = 0.045 and cortical thickness p = 0.005). Cross sectional moment of inertia (CSMI) and section moduli were significantly reduced at the femoral neck (CSMI1 p = 0.002, CSMI2 p = 0.012 and section moduli Z1 p < 0.001, Z2 p = 0.004) and the ultra-distal radius (CSMI1 p = 0.008 and section moduli Z1 p = 0.018, Z2 p = 0.007). In stepwise logistic regression analysis distal forearm fracture showed the strongest association with a model comprising ultra-distal forearm trabecular vBMD (negative), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP, positive) and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG, negative). In conclusion, these observations explain the structural reasons for the increased fracture risk in men with distal forearm fractures., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Birgit Hanusch, Stephen Tuck and Harish Datta have received grants from the National Osteoporosis Society. Birgit Hanusch, Stephen Tuck, Harish Datta and Julie Walker are also supported by an innovative award from the National Osteoporosis Society (Grant number CS/250). Stephen Tuck has received speaker fees from Ely Lilly, Servier, Internist and Amgen. Richard McNally and Michael Prediger declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mechanical loading exerts a profound influence on bone density and architecture, but the exact mechanism is unknown. Our study shows that expression of the neurological transcriptional factor zinc finger of the cerebellum 1 ( ZIC1 ) is markedly increased in trabecular bone biopsies in the lumbar spine compared with the iliac crest, skeletal sites of high and low mechanical stress, respectively. Human trabecular bone transcriptome analyses revealed a strong association between ZIC1 mRNA levels and gene transcripts characteristically associated with osteoblasts, osteocytes and osteoclasts. This supposition is supported by higher ZIC1 expression in iliac bone biopsies from postmenopausal women with osteoporosis compared with age-matched control subjects, as well as strongly significant inverse correlation between ZIC1 mRNA levels and BMI-adjusted bone mineral density (BMD) (Z-score). ZIC1 promoter methylation was decreased in mechanically loaded vertebral bone compared to unloaded normal iliac bone, and its mRNA levels correlated inversely with ZIC1 promoter methylation, thus linking mechanical stress to epigenetic control of gene expression. The findings were corroborated in cultures of rat osteoblast progenitors and osteoblast-like cells. This study demonstrates for the first time how skeletal epigenetic changes that are affected by mechanical forces give rise to marked alteration in bone cell transcriptional activity and translate to human bone pathophysiology.

Background: The aim of our study was to investigate the predictive value of the biomarkers interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 10 (IL-10) and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) compared with clinical CRB and CRB-65 severity scores in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)., Methods: Samples and data were obtained from patients enrolled into the German CAPNETZ study group. Samples (blood, sputum and urine) were collected within 24 h of first presentation and inclusion in the CAPNETZ study, and CRB and CRB-65 scores were determined for all patients at the time of enrollment. The combined end point representative of a severe course of CAP was defined as mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit treatment and/or death within 30 days. Overall, a total of 1,000 patients were enrolled in the study. A severe course of CAP was observed in 105 (10.5%) patients., Results: The highest IL-6, IL-10 and LBP concentrations were found in patients with CRB-65 scores of 3-4 or CRB scores of 2-3. IL-6 and LBP levels on enrollment in the study were significantly higher for patients with a severe course of CAP than for those who did not have severe CAP. In receiver operating characteristic analyses, the area under the curve values for of IL-6 (0.689), IL-10 (0.665) and LPB (0.624) in a severe course of CAP were lower than that of CRB-65 (0.764) and similar to that of CRB (0.69). The accuracy of both CRB and CRB-65 was increased significantly by including IL-6 measurements. In addition, higher cytokine concentrations were found in patients with typical bacterial infections compared with patients with atypical or viral infections and those with infection of unknown etiology. LBP showed the highest discriminatory power with respect to the etiology of infection., Conclusions: IL-6, IL-10 and LBP concentrations were increased in patients with a CRB-65 score of 3-4 and a severe course of CAP. The concentrations of IL-6 and IL-10 reflected the severity of disease in patients with CAP. The predictive power of IL-6, IL-10 and LBP for a severe course of pneumonia was lower than that of CRB-65. Typical bacterial pathogens induced the highest LBP, IL-6 and IL-10 concentrations., (© 2012 Zobel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.)