1. Impact of prior inotuzumab ozogamicin treatment on brexucabtagene autoleucel outcomes in adults with B-cell ALL.
- Author
-
Aldoss, Ibrahim, Roloff, Gregory, Faramand, Rawan, Kopmar, Noam, Lin, Chenyu, Advani, Anjali, Dekker, Simone, Gupta, Vishal, OConnor, Timothy, Jeyakumar, Nikeshan, Muhsen, Ibrahim, Valtis, Yannis, Zhang, Amy, Miller, Katharine, Sutherland, Katherine, Dykes, Kaitlyn, Ahmed, Mohamed, Chen, Evan, Zambrano, Hector, Bradshaw, Danielle, Mercadal, Santiago, Schwartz, Marc, Tracy, Sean, Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai, Kubiak, Michal, Mukherjee, Akash, Majhail, Navneet, Battiwalla, Minoo, Mountjoy, Luke, Malik, Shahbaz, Mathews, John, Shaughnessy, Paul, Logan, Aaron, Ladha, Abdullah, Stefan, Maryann, Guzowski, Caitlin, Hoeg, Rasmus, Hilal, Talal, Moore, Jozal, Connor, Matthew, ODwyer, Kristen, Hill, LaQuisa, Tsai, Stephanie, Sasine, Joshua, Solh, Melhem, Lee, Catherine, Kota, Vamsi, Koura, Divya, Veeraputhiran, Muthu, Blunk, Betsy, Oliai, Caspian, Leonard, Jessica, Frey, Noelle, Park, Jae, Luskin, Marlise, Bachanova, Veronika, Galal, Ahmed, Bishop, Michael, Stock, Wendy, Cassaday, Ryan, Pullarkat, Vinod, Shah, Bijal, and Muffly, Lori
- Subjects
Humans ,Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ,Adult ,Male ,Female ,Middle Aged ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Treatment Outcome ,Young Adult ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Immunological ,Adolescent ,Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma ,Immunotherapy ,Adoptive - Abstract
The effect of prior inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) treatment on brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) outcomes remains unclear in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of 189 patients with relapsed/refractory ALL treated with brexu-cel. Over half of the patients received InO before brexu-cel (InO exposed). InO-exposed patients were more heavily pretreated (P = .02) and frequently had active marrow disease before apheresis (P = .03). Response rate and toxicity profile after brexu-cel were comparable for InO-exposed and InO-naïve patients; however, consolidation therapy after brexu-cel response was used at a higher rate in InO-naïve patients (P = .005). With a median follow-up of 11.4 months, InO-exposed patients had inferior progression-free survival (PFS; P = .013) and overall survival (OS; P = .006) in univariate analyses; however, prior InO exposure did not influence PFS (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-2.03) in multivariate models. Within InO-exposed patients, InO responders had superior PFS (P = .002) and OS (P < .0001) relative to InO-refractory patients. The timing of administering InO did not affect brexu-cel outcomes, with comparable PFS (P = .51) and OS (P = .86) for patients receiving InO as bridging therapy or before apheresis. In conclusion, although InO exposure was associated with inferior survival outcomes after brexu-cel in unadjusted analyses, these associations were no longer significant in multivariate analyses, suggesting it is unlikely that InO negatively affects brexu-cel efficacy. Our data instead imply that InO-exposed recipients of brexu-cel tend to be higher-risk patients with intrinsic adverse leukemia biology.
- Published
- 2024