Search

Measurable residual disease (MRD)-guided pre-emptive therapies are now widely used to prevent post-transplant hematological relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This single-center retrospective study aimed to clarify the significance of pre-emptive treatment based on Wilms' tumor gene-1 mRNA (WT1) monitoring for MRD in patients with AML who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Patients with AML who received chemotherapy for hematological relapse or WT1 increase after allo-HSCT were eligible for inclusion. From January 2017 to June 2022, 30 patients with a median age of 57 (16–70) years were included and stratified into two groups: 10 with WT1 increase and 20 with hematological relapse. The median times from HCT to WT1 increase or hematological relapse were 309 days (range: 48–985) or 242 days (range: 67–1116), respectively. Less intensive chemotherapy using azacitidine or cytarabine was selected for all patients with WT1 increase and 12 (60%) with hematological relapse. The 1-year overall survival and event-free survival rates for WT1 increase and hematological relapse were 70% vs. 44% (P = 0.024) and 70% vs. 29% (P = 0.029), respectively. These real-world data suggest that WT1-guided pre-emptive therapy may be superior to therapy after hematological relapse in patients with AML who have undergone allo-HSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary This prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the pre‐emptive treatment modality of azacitidine in combination with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) in AML/MDS patients post‐transplantation. Forty‐seven patients aged 17–62 were enrolled with 14 patients having completed the planned 12 cycles. Following initiation, 72.3% responded positively after the first cycle, peaking at 77.2% by the fifth cycle. Notably, 24 patients maintained sustained responses throughout a median follow‐up of 1050 days (range, 866–1234). Overall survival, leukaemia‐free survival and event‐free survival probabilities at 3 years were 69.5%, 60.4% and 35.7% respectively. Cumulative incidences of relapse and non‐relapse mortality were 36.5% and 4.3% respectively. Multivariate analysis identified that receiving pre‐emptive treatment for fewer than six cycles and the absence of chronic graft‐versus‐host disease after intervention was significantly associated with poorer clinical outcomes. The combination of azacitidine with IFN‐α was well‐tolerated with no observed severe myelotoxicity, and the majority of adverse events were reversible and manageable. In conclusion, the use of azacitidine in conjunction with IFN‐α as pre‐emptive therapy is a safe and effective treatment to prevent disease progression in AML/MDS patients with MRD positivity post‐allo‐HSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Comparison of Antiviral Preventative Strategies In Liver Transplant (CAPSIL) study showed pre‐emptive therapy (PET) to be superior to antiviral prophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease prevention in high‐risk CMV seronegative liver transplant recipients (LTRs) with seropositive donors (D+R−). Despite the statistical superiority of PET over prophylaxis in research settings, PET is perceived as a logistically more complex strategy that requires careful coordination of weekly CMV PCR testing, prompt initiation of CMV antivirals upon viremia detection, and timely cessation of antivirals following viremia resolution. Transplant centers may be hesitant to use PET for CMV disease prevention in D+R− LTRs out of concern that PET coordination is not feasible in clinical practice. We recently described our experience using PET in CMV D+R− LTRs in a real‐world setting, and found it to be as effective for CMV disease prevention as PET performed as part of a clinical trial. Here, we describe a systematic approach for PET implementation in real‐world settings and provide practical tools to address anticipated challenges. This framework can support transplant programs in overcoming logistical barriers to PET and incorporating an evidence‐based and cost‐effective CMV prevention strategy into routine care for high‐risk CMV D+R− LTRs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the use of pre-emptive therapy (PET) and prophylaxis (PRO) for preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in liver transplant recipients. The authors compare their real-world experience with PET and PRO to the findings of a previous study. They found that PET did not significantly reduce the incidence of CMV disease compared to PRO, and PET was associated with higher costs. The authors suggest that PET may not have advantages over PRO in certain real-world settings. They also highlight the importance of carefully conducting PET according to rigorous standards for optimal efficacy. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Two approaches are used to manage invasive fungal disease (IFD) in febrile neutropenic patients viz. empirical therapy (without attempting to confirm the diagnosis), or pre‐emptive therapy (after screening tests for IFD). Objective: This systematic review was undertaken to compare these approaches in children. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Clinical Trial Registries and grey literature, for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing empirical versus pre‐emptive antifungal therapy in children with FN suspected to have IFD. We used the Cochrane Risk of bias 2 tool for quality assessment, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Results: We identified 7989 citations. Stepwise screening identified only one relevant RCT that administered empirical (n = 73) or pre‐emptive (n = 76) antifungal therapy. There were no significant differences in all‐cause mortality (RR 1.56, 95% CI: 0.46, 5.31), IFD mortality (RR 1.04, 95% CI:0.15, 7.20) and other clinically important outcomes such as duration of fever, duration of hospitalization and proportion requiring ICU admission. There were no safety data reported. The number of days of antifungal therapy was significantly lower in the pre‐emptive therapy arm. The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was 'moderate'. Conclusions: This systematic review highlighted the paucity of data, comparing empirical versus pre‐emptive antifungal therapy in children with febrile neutropenia having suspected invasive fungal disease. Data from a single included trial suggests that both approaches may be comparable in research settings. Robust trials are warranted to address the gap in existing knowledge about the optimal approach in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of morbidity after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Pre‐emptive therapy (PET) with valganciclovir (VGC) is associated with haematological toxicity. Methods: We included alloHCT patients from 2018 to 2021 where letermovir (LTV) was used for CMV PET because of cytopenias. Results: Ten patients were included. Six received VGC prior to LTV. VGC was commenced at median d42, given for median 40 days. LTV was commenced at median d90, given for median 54 days. At commencement of antiviral, CMV viral load was higher for VGC at 3.7 log10 IU/mL, compared to LTV at 2.9 log10 IU/mL. Viral load reduction occurred at 0.18 log10 IU/mL per week for VGC, compared to 0.17 log10 IU/mL per week for LTV. There was no clinically significant CMV viremia after stopping LTV. Cytopenias improved on LTV. Conclusion: LTV was effective in controlling CMV viremia when it was given at a lower starting CMV viral load and later post alloHCT than VGC. Further study is required of LTV as upfront PET following alloHCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Heart transplant (HT) recipients with prior exposure to cytomegalovirus (CMV R+) are considered intermediate risk for CMV‐related complications. Consensus guidelines allow for either universal prophylaxis (UP) or preemptive therapy (PET) (serial CMV testing) approaches to CMV prevention in such patients. Whether an optimal approach to mitigate CMV related risks exists in this setting remains uncertain. We therefore assessed the utility of PET as compared to UP in CMV R+ HT recipients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all CMV R+ HT recipients from 6 U.S. centers between 2010 and 2018 was performed. The primary outcome was the development of CMV DNAemia or end‐organ disease resulting in the initiation/escalation of anti‐CMV therapy. The secondary outcome was CMV‐related hospitalization. Additional outcomes included incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) ≥ grade 2R, death, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and leukopenia. Results: Of 563 CMV R+ HT recipients, 344 (61.1%) received UP. PET was associated with increased risk for the primary (adjusted HR 3.95, 95% CI: 2.65–5.88, p <.001) and secondary (adjusted HR 3.19, 95% CI: 1.47–6.94, p =.004) outcomes, and with increased ACR ≥ grade 2R (PET 59.4% vs. UP 34.4%, p <.001). Incidence of detectable CAV was similar at 1 year (PET 8.2% vs. UP 9.5%, p =.698). UP was associated with increased incidence of leukopenia within 6 months post‐HT (PET 34.7% vs. UP 43.6%, p =.036). Conclusion: The use of a PET CMV prophylaxis strategy in intermediate risk HT recipients associated with increased risk of CMV infection and CMV‐related hospitalization, and may associate with worse post‐HT graft outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Viruses cause a large burden of human infectious diseases. During the past 50 years, antivirals have been developed to treat many pathogenic viruses, including herpesviruses, retroviruses, hepatitis viruses, and influenza. Besides being used as treatment, antivirals have shown efficacy for preventing certain viral infections. Following the success in the HIV field, a renewed interest has emerged on the use of antivirals as prophylaxis for other viruses. The development of formulations with extended half-life has pushed further this consideration in persons at risk for a wide range of viral infections. In this way, long-acting antivirals might behave as "chemovaccines" when classical vaccines do not exist, cannot be recommended, immune responses are suboptimal, escape mutants emerge, and/or immunity wanes. Five main caveats would temper its use, namely, selection of drug resistance, drug interactions, short- and long-term side effects, potential teratogenicity in women of child-bearing age, and high cost. Herein, we discuss the prospects for long-acting antivirals as prophylaxis of human viral infections other than HIV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) is mainly due to an increase of latent viremia in previously exposed patients. Furthermore, CMV reactivation in this setting has a significant impact on patient survival. Traditional approach to CMV reactivation post allo-HSCT was a pre-emptive treatment with antivirals in the case of increased viremia. However, since 2017, a new antiviral compound, letermovir, has been introduced in clinical practice and is deeply changing the common CMV approach. The toxicity profile of letermovir allowed its use in prophylaxes in patients at high risk of CMV reactivation. This review will focus on the present role of letermovir post allo-HSCT and discuss some possible future applications of the drug. Finally, our single center CMV management in view of the recent introduction of letermovir will be discussed.

Objectives: The prevalence and reactivating pattern of cytomegalovirus (CMV) among renal transplant recipients in Sri Lanka is scarce. The study was aimed to describe the replication patterns of CMV in post-renal transplant recipients who were on pre-emptive therapy and identify the risk factors and time period for CMV reactivating during the 1st year of transplantation and provide an insight into the selection of pre-emptive therapy in the local setting. Methods: A retrospective and cohort study was conducted, enrolling renal transplant recipients who have completed routine 1-year follow-up for pre-emptive management at the National Hospital, Kandy, from January 2016 to January 2021. CMV quantitative polymerase chain reaction results and demographic data of enrolled recipients were analyzed to investigate the CMV replication pattern and risk factors. Categorical data were analyzed using Pearson’s Chi-square test, considering P < 0.05 statistically significant. Continuous variables were presented as percentages. Results: Two hundred and fifty-one renal transplant recipients’ data were included in the study. Of them, 75.70% were male patients, and the mean age of the study population was 43.25 years. CMV DNAemia incidence was 56.57% during the 1st year of post-renal transplantation. Only 9.16% had developed more than 104 IU/mL or significant DNAemia. Sex and donor type were not risk factors for CMV reactivation. However, the recipient’s age was significantly associated with CMV viraemia among renal transplant recipients. Conclusion: Considering the low incidence of significant viraemia among the study population, pre-emptive treatment would be the cost-effective strategy for management of the post-renal transplant recipients in local settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) is mainly due to an increase of latent viremia in previously exposed patients. Furthermore, CMV reactivation in this setting has a significant impact on patient survival. Traditional approach to CMV reactivation post allo-HSCT was a pre-emptive treatment with antivirals in the case of increased viremia. However, since 2017, a new antiviral compound, letermovir, has been introduced in clinical practice and is deeply changing the common CMV approach. The toxicity profile of letermovir allowed its use in prophylaxes in patients at high risk of CMV reactivation. This review will focus on the present role of letermovir post allo-HSCT and discuss some possible future applications of the drug. Finally, our single center CMV management in view of the recent introduction of letermovir will be discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is an important tool to optimally address post-transplant management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the impact of bone marrow CD34+ molecular chimerism and WT1 on the outcome of a consecutive series of 168 AML patients submitted to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Results: The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR)was significantly lower in patients with donor chimerism on CD34+ cells = 97.5% and WT1 < 213 copies/ABL x 10-4 both at 1st month (p=0.008 and p<0.001) and at 3rd month (p<0.001 for both). By combining chimerism and WT1 at 3rd month, 13 patients with chimerism < 97.5% or WT1 > 213 showed intermediate prognosis. 12 of these patients fell in this category because of molecular chimerism < 97.5% at a time-point in which WT1 was < 213. Conclusions: Our results confirm that lineage-specific molecular chimerism and WT1 after allo-SCT (1st and 3rd month) are useful MRD markers. When considered together at 3rd month, CD34+ molecular chimerism could represent an earlier predictor of relapse compared to WT1. Further studies are necessary to confirm this preliminary observation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection represents a major complication for solid organ transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to verify if the measurement of HCMV‐specific T‐cells could help to identify patients protected against HCMV disease cytokine flow cytometry using infected dendritic cells as stimulus (CFC‐iDC, which discriminates between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells), and ELISPOT, using infected cell lysate (ELISPOT‐iCL) or pp65 (ELISPOT‐pp65) as stimulus, were adopted. Among the 47 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) enrolled, 29 had a self‐resolving HCMV infection (Controllers) and 18 required antiviral treatment (Non‐Controllers). HCMV‐specific T‐cell frequency at the peak of HCMV infection identified Controllers and Non‐Controllers, although the diagnostic performance of CD8+ CFC‐iDC (area under the curve [AUC] of the receiver‐operator characteristic curve: 0.65) was lower than that of CD4+ CFC‐iDC (AUC: 0.83), ELISPOT‐iCL (AUC: 0.83) and ELISPOT‐pp65 (AUC: 0.80). CFC‐iDC detected a protective immune reconstitution significantly earlier (median time: 38 days) than ELISPOT‐iCL and ELISPOT‐pp65 (median time: 126 and 133 days, respectively). Time to protective immune reconstitution in Non‐Controllers was significantly longer than in Controllers with the ELISPOT and the CD4+ CFC‐iDC assays, but not with CD8+ CFC‐iDC. The majority of patients did not require antiviral treatment after protective immune reconstitution, with the exception of five patients according to CFC‐iDC assay, one patient according to ELISPOT‐iCL assay and three patients according to ELISPOT‐pp65 assay. Monitoring the HCMV‐specific immunological reconstitution with is effective in discriminating KTR at risk of or protected from HCMV disease and the ELISPOT assays are suitable for implementation in the clinical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundMinimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is an important tool to optimally address post-transplant management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the impact of bone marrow CD34+ molecular chimerism and WT1 on the outcome of a consecutive series of 168 AML patients submitted to allogeneic stem cell transplantation.ResultsThe cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower in patients with donor chimerism on CD34+ cells ≥ 97.5% and WT1 < 213 copies/ABL x 10^4 both at 1st month (p=0.008 and p 213 showed intermediate prognosis. 12 of these patients fell in this category because of molecular chimerism < 97.5% at a time-point in which WT1 was < 213.ConclusionsOur results confirm that lineage-specific molecular chimerism and WT1 after allo-SCT (1st and 3rd month) are useful MRD markers. When considered together at 3rd month, CD34+ molecular chimerism could represent an earlier predictor of relapse compared to WT1. Further studies are necessary to confirm this preliminary observation.

The efficacy of pre-emptive therapy in the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and the potential association of CMV infection with the occurrence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) was evaluated in 129 lung transplant recipients receiving pre-emptive therapy based on pp65-antigenemia or CMV-DNA in the blood and in the bronchoalveolar lavage. Seventy-one (55%) patients received pre-emptive ganciclovir/valganciclovir (GCV/VGCV) for CMV infection for a median of 28 (9–191) days. Possible CMV disease occurred in six (5%) patients and was healed after the GCV/VGCV therapy. The cumulative incidence of CLAD was 38% and 54% at 5 and 10 years. Acute rejection and CMV load in the blood (but not in the lung) were independent predictors of the occurrence of CLAD. Pre-emptive therapy is highly effective in preventing CMV disease in lung recipients and does not induce a superior incidence of CLAD compared to what reported for other cohorts of patients who received an extended antiviral prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Infections are leading causes of morbidity/mortality following solid organ transplantation (SOT) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) is among the most frequent pathogens, causing a considerable threat to SOT recipients. A survey was conducted 19 July–31 October 2019 to capture clinical practices about CMV in SOT recipients (e.g., how practices aligned with guidelines, how adequately treatments met patients’ needs, and respondents’ expectations for future developments). Transplant professionals completed a ~30-minute online questionnaire: 224 responses were included, representing 160 hospitals and 197 SOT programs (41 countries; 167[83%] European programs). Findings revealed a heterogenous approach to CMV diagnosis and management and, sometimes, significant divergence from international guidelines. Valganciclovir prophylaxis (of variable duration) was administered by 201/224 (90%) respondents in D+/R− SOT and by 40% in R+ cases, with pre-emptive strategies generally reserved for R+ cases: DNA thresholds to initiate treatment ranged across 10–10,000 copies/ml. Ganciclovir-resistant CMV strains were still perceived as major challenges, and tailored treatment was one of the most important unmet needs for CMV management. These findings may help to design studies to evaluate safety and efficacy of new strategies to prevent CMV disease in SOT recipients, and target specific educational activities to harmonize CMV management in this challenging population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Longitudinal molecular measurable residual disease (MRD) sampling after completion of therapy serves as a refined tool for identification of imminent relapse of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) among patients in long‐term haematological complete remission. Tracking of increasing quantitative polymerase chain reaction MRD before cytomorphological reappearance of blasts may instigate individual management decisions and has paved the way for development of pre‐emptive treatment strategies to substantially delay or perhaps even revert leukaemic regrowth. Traditionally, MRD monitoring is performed using repeated bone marrow aspirations, albeit the current European LeukemiaNet MRD recommendations acknowledge the use of peripheral blood as an alternative source for MRD assessment. Persistent MRD positivity in the bone marrow despite continuous morphological remission is frequent in both core binding factor leukaemias and nucleophosmin 1‐mutated AML. In contrast, monthly assessment of MRD in peripheral blood superiorly separates patients with imminent haematological relapse from long‐term remitters and may allow pre‐emptive therapy of AML relapse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intensified immunosuppressive prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) may be toxic and therefore warranted only in patients at high risk of developing GVHD. In patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant at the authors' center, high serum soluble IL-2 receptor alpha (sIL-2Rα) and low IL-15 levels on day 7 post-transplant were found to predict a high risk of developing clinically significant GVHD (sGVHD), defined as grade 2–4 acute GVHD or moderate to severe chronic GVHD. This was a prospective, phase 2 trial in which high-risk patients (serum sIL-2Rα >4500 ng/L or IL-15 <31 ng/L) received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) 3 mg/kg on day 8 post-transplant. Controls consisted of patients who had their sIL-2Rα/IL-15 levels measured but did not participate in the trial. A total of 68 trial patients and 143 controls were accrued to this study. The primary endpoint was incidence of sGVHD. There was a reduction in sGVHD in high-risk trial patients (received day 8 ATG) compared with high-risk controls (did not receive day 8 ATG) (sub-hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.48, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in overall survival or relapse; however, there was a greater incidence of non-GVHD-associated non-relapse mortality in high-risk trial patients (SHR = 3.73, P < 0.05), mostly related to infections. This may be due in part to the biomarkers ineffectively stratifying GVHD risk. Pre-emptive ATG therapy is both feasible and effective at reducing sGVHD without increasing relapse. Further mitigation strategies are needed to reduce the risk of infection associated with intensified GVHD prophylaxis. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01994824). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is a frequent complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). Method: We analyzed 159 alloHCT recipients with 4409 quantitative CMV viral loads to determine pre‐transplant predictors of CMV reactivation, clinically significant CMV infection (cs‐CMVi, defined as CMV viral load >1000 IU/mL), CMV disease, kinetics of spontaneous clearance of CMV, and survival using a standardized pre‐emptive therapy approach to identify at‐risk groups to target prevention strategies. Results: Cs‐CMVi was most common in D−/R+ unrelated donor transplants (URD). Spontaneous CMV clearance occurred in 26% of patients who reached a viral load of 56‐137 IU/mL, 6% at 138‐250 IU/mL and in one patient >250 IU/mL. Median time between the first CMV reactivation (>56 IU/mL) and a viral load >250 IU/mL was 13 days, whereas the time from the first viral load >250 IU/mL to reach a vial load >1000 IU/mL was 4 days. Cs‐CMVi was associated with a significant increase in non‐relapse mortality (NRM) on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Overall, this study indicates that D−/R+ URD recipients are at high‐risk for cs‐CMVi‐ and CMV‐related mortality, and are potential candidates for targeted CMV prophylaxis. Spontaneous clearance of CMV beyond a viral load of 250 IU/mL is uncommon, suggesting that this could be used as an appropriate threshold to initiate pre‐emptive therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study is to compare the curative effect of empirical with diagnostic-driven (pre-emptive) therapy of voriconazole in severe aplastic anaemia patients (SAAs) with invasive fungal disease (IFD) after intensive immunosuppressive therapy (IST). Patients undergoing voriconazole antifungal therapy were randomized to empirical therapy group and diagnostic-driven therapy group. Empirical therapy group accounted for 48.5% of all cases, and diagnostic-driven therapy group accounted for 51.5%. The morbidity of IFD (probable and proven cases) was slightly increased in diagnostic-driven therapy group compared with empirical therapy group (P > 0.05). The total effective rate was 62.1%. The effective rate in empirical therapy group was 78.1%, which was significantly increased compared with diagnostic-driven therapy group (47.1%) (P < 0.05). This value was especially significant in possible IFD cases (P < 0.05). The efficacy of possible IFD cases in empirical therapy group was the best (84%) followed by the probable and proven cases in empirical therapy group (57.1%). In diagnostic-driven therapy group, the efficacy of possible IFD cases was 50%, and the efficacy of probable and proven cases was only 37.5%. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is the key anti-infection factor. The efficacy of patients whose ANC ˂ 0.1 × 109/L was 39.28%, which was significantly reduced compared with that of patients whose ANC ≥ 0.1 × 109/L (78.95%) (P < 0.05). This finding was especially obvious in diagnostic-driven therapy group. As empirical therapy is superior to diagnostic-driven therapy, we recommend that empirical therapy should be started for high-risk patients, and efforts should be made to definitively diagnose the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

T cell mixed chimerism (MC) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with myeloablative conditioning for hematological malignancies may indicate engraftment failure or disease relapse. Immune modulation, such as donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) or the rapid tapering-off or stopping of immunosuppressive treatment, can reverse MC to full donor chimerism (FDC). However, the development or aggravation of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and the related mortality remain major concerns with immune modulation. In this prospective, single-arm study (NCT03663751), we tested the efficacy and safety of low-dose decitabine (LD-DAC, 5 mg/m2 daily for 5 days and repeated every 6–8 weeks) without immune modulation in the treatment of patients with MC to prevent MC-associated relapse and/or graft failure. A total of 14 patients were enrolled. All the patients received myeloablative conditioning regimens, and MC was documented from day +30 to day +180 after allo-HSCT with a donor chimerism level ranging from 59 to 97% without detectable measurable residual disease (MRD). Eleven patients (78.6%) responded favorably to treatment, showing increased levels of donor chimerism (≥95%), while nine achieved FDC. All of these patients maintained their responses for a median of 11 months (3–22). The three patients who failed to respond favorably eventually either relapsed or experienced graft failure. All three were alive and in remission at the last follow-up after the second allo-HSCT. LD-DAC monotherapy was well tolerated and exerted limited hematological and nonhematological toxicities. New-onset GvHD symptoms were observed only in two patients. Overall, the estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) after allo-HSCT were 90.9 ± 8.7% and 67.0 ± 13.7%, respectively. In conclusion, LD-DAC alone could reverse MC in most patients after allo-HSCT with myeloablative conditioning, while those who achieved FDC enjoyed long-term EFS without major complications. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm the benefits of LD-DAC.

CMV infection is a major challenge in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). The changing landscape in CMV management includes the introduction of letermovir in prophylaxis of high-risk patients and the source of CMV DNA monitoring (plasma—PL vs. whole blood—WB), for pre-emptive therapy (PET) initiation. We report here how our real-life experience in CMV management evolved, following letermovir registration. We focus on: (i) the effects of systematic use of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in high-risk patients, (ii) the results of a longitudinal comparison of CMV DNAemia monitoring in PL and WB. From December 2018 to April 2020, 60 allo-SCTs have been performed in our center (LET ERA), of whom 45 received letermovir in prophylaxis from day 0 to day + 100, because of recipient positivity of anti CMV IgG. These patients were compared with a cohort of 41 allo-SCTs performed between November 2017 and November 2018 (NO LET ERA). Firstly, the incidence of CMV clinically significant infections, CMV disease, bacterial infections, proven/probable fungal infections, hospital re-admissions after allo-SCT by day + 100 in the two ERA were 8 vs. 44% (p = 0.0006), 2 vs. 12% (p = 0.02), 37 vs. 56% (p = 0.05), 8 vs. 19% (p = 0.09), and 23 vs. 39% (p = 0.09), respectively. By day + 180 these differences were 17 vs. 68% (p < 0.00001), 2 vs. 12% (p = 0.02), 45 vs. 78% (p = 0.09), 8 vs. 22% (p = 0.05), and 40 vs. 66% (p = 0.01), respectively. Secondly, from February to May 2019, we comparatively measured CMV DNA from WB and PL and we confirmed that there is a linear correlation between CMV DNA level in WB and PL (Spearman’s test r = 0.86). Moreover, CMV DNAemia at the time of PET in the 12 patients with a clinically significant CMV infection was higher in WB vs. PL (5.202 vs. 4.981 copies/ml, p = 0.1). Our real-life experience confirms that: (i) letermovir is highly effective, leading to a significant drop in CMV clinically significant infections and CMV-related complications by day + 100 and + 180 after allo-SCT; (ii) WB may be an effective alternative to PL as a source for CMV DNA monitoring, as a linear correlation of DNAemia was confirmed between WB and PL, even if the CMV DNAemia at PET initiation was comparable in the two sources.

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia / Journal Canadien d'Anesthésie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Opinion Statement: The expanding availability of minimal or more precisely measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with its possible implications for therapeutic decisions is of high interest to clinicians treating AML patients. A variety of mostly retrospective studies have shown that AML patients with a positive MRD test, assessed by different techniques at defined cutoffs and time-points, are at significantly higher risk of relapse and experience shorter overall survival compared to MRD-negative patients. How this valuable information may be adapted in the daily routine of patients' treatment to distinguish individuals who need more aggressive therapy from the ones who can be spared additional therapy to avoid treatment-related toxicities is still being investigated. With the exception of MRD analyses in acute promyelocitic leukemia (APL), the clinical implications of MRD tests for the individual AML patient are still mostly unknown. We currently lack hard evidence that MRD-based therapy modulation during treatment or pre-emptive intervention in MRD-positive patients after therapy would improve outcomes in non-APL AML patients. These questions will be evaluated in prospective randomized clinical trials. Today, however, some conclusions with regard to MRD assessment in AML can be drawn from the published data and are reviewed in this article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo‐HCT). We conducted a retrospective study to determine the clinical and economic burden of pre‐emptive therapy (PET) for CMV infection in 100 consecutive hospitalized adult CMV positive serostatus allo‐HCT recipients and compared their hospitalization cost with allo‐HCT recipients hospitalized with graft vs host disease without CMV infection (control group) and across 19 US cancer centers for hospitalized patients with CMV infection between 2012 and 2015 (Vizient database). A total of 192 CMV episodes of PET for CMV infection occurred within 1 year post‐HCT. PET consisted of ganciclovir (41% of episodes), foscarnet (40%), and valganciclovir (38%) with the longest average length of stay in foscarnet‐treated patients (41 days). The average direct cost per patient admitted for PET was $116 976 (range: $7866‐$641 841) compared with $12 496 (range: $2004‐$43 069) in the control group (P < .0001). The total direct cost per encounter was significantly higher in patients treated with foscarnet and had nephrotoxicity ($284 006) compared with those who did not ($112 195). The average cost amongst the 19 US cancer centers, including our institution, was $42 327 with major disparities in cost and clinical outcomes. PET for CMV infection is associated with high economic burden in allo‐HCT recipients. Highlight: The average direct cost for allo‐HCT recipients hospitalized for PET for CMV infection was higher than that of recipients hospitalized for GVHD.There are major clinical and economic disparities of CMV infections in allo‐HCT recipients across 19 U.S. cancer centers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The natural history of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in transplant patients has been well established. This virus may originate from the recipient, the donor or both. When pre-transplant IgG antibodies in the recipient are taken into account, three types of infection are possible: primary, reactivation or reinfection. The risks of high viral load and end-organ disease are highest after primary infection and lowest after reactivation. Serial monitoring of patients by quantitative polymerase chain reaction for CMV DNA allows antiviral drugs to be deployed for pre-emptive therapy or an antiviral drug may be given prophylactically. Both of these strategies are effective, but pre-emptive therapy has the advantage that randomised allocation of a new drug or placebo given prophylactically may show a reduced need for pre-emptive valganciclovir. In this review, I will consider what has been learned from use of ganciclovir and valganciclovir and apply this information to clinical trials that have evaluated maribavir, brincidofovir and letermovir. In addition, pre-emptive therapy has the advantage of facilitating the discovery of vaccines against CMV using a pharmacodynamic approach. Briefly, patients awaiting transplantation are given vaccine or placebo pre-transplant. When they proceed to transplantation, various parameters of viral load can be compared to determine if the vaccine has an effect against CMV when compared to patients randomised to receive placebo. If there is evidence of control of CMV, this can be related to immune responses induced by the vaccine to define a correlate of protection. This review will summarise the published evidence available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ability to detect residual levels of leukemic blasts (measurable residual disease, MRD) has already been integrated in the daily routine for treatment of patients with chronic myeloid and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a variety of mostly retrospective studies have shown that individuals in AML remission who tested positive for MRD at specific time-points or had increasing MRD levels are at significantly higher risk of relapse and death compared to MRD-negative patients. However, these studies differ with respect to the “MRD-target”, time-point of MRD determination, material analyzed, and method applied. How this probably very valuable MRD information in individual patients may be adapted in the daily clinical routine, e.g., to separate patients who need more aggressive therapies from those who may be spared additional—potentially toxic—therapies is still a work-in-progress. With the exception of MRD assessment in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), the lack of randomized, prospective trials renders MRD-based decisions and clinical implications in AML a difficult task. As of today, we still do not have proof that early intervention in MRD-positive AML patients would improve outcomes, although this is very likely. In this article, we review the current knowledge on non-APL AML MRD assessment and possible clinical consequences.

Objectives: The prevalence and reactivating pattern of cytomegalovirus (CMV) among renal transplant recipients in Sri Lanka is scarce. The study was aimed to describe the replication patterns of CMV in post-renal transplant recipients who were on pre-emptive therapy and identify the risk factors and time period for CMV reactivating during the 1 st year of transplantation and provide an insight into the selection of pre-emptive therapy in the local setting., Methods: A retrospective and cohort study was conducted, enrolling renal transplant recipients who have completed routine 1-year follow-up for pre-emptive management at the National Hospital, Kandy, from January 2016 to January 2021. CMV quantitative polymerase chain reaction results and demographic data of enrolled recipients were analyzed to investigate the CMV replication pattern and risk factors. Categorical data were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-square test, considering P < 0.05 statistically significant. Continuous variables were presented as percentages., Results: Two hundred and fifty-one renal transplant recipients' data were included in the study. Of them, 75.70% were male patients, and the mean age of the study population was 43.25 years. CMV DNAemia incidence was 56.57% during the 1 st year of post-renal transplantation. Only 9.16% had developed more than 10 4 IU/mL or significant DNAemia. Sex and donor type were not risk factors for CMV reactivation. However, the recipient's age was significantly associated with CMV viraemia among renal transplant recipients., Conclusion: Considering the low incidence of significant viraemia among the study population, pre-emptive treatment would be the cost-effective strategy for management of the post-renal transplant recipients in local settings., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no competing interests., (Copyright: © International Journal of Health Sciences.)

Aim: We evaluated a risk-guided strategy to prevent cytomegalovirus-associated complications (CMV-ac) after liver transplantation (LT). Patients & methods: Forty liver graft recipients were stratified according to their CMV risk status to prophylactic (high risk, HR and group) or pre-emptive antiviral treatment (intermediate, IR, and low risk, LR and group). A detailed analysis of clinical and virological data was performed. Results: 8/40 patients were classified within the HR, 28/40 within the IR and 4/40 within the LR group. Incidence of CMV viremia was 3/8 (38%) in the HR, 9/28 (32%) in the IR and 0/5 in the LR group. Mortality rate of CMV-ac was 0%. Conclusion: A risk-guided antiviral strategy is effective to prevent severe CMV-ac up to 1 year after LT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Latent infection with human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is common. Functional immunity effectively contains such latent infections; however, CMV reactivation may cause significant complications in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). In spite of the universal implementation of post-transplant screening for CMV viremia and the institution of pre-emptive antiviral management, CMV disease still occurs in a small portion of patients. Moreover, interactions between CMV and the immune system have significant implications for the incidence of graft-versus-host disease, the recurrence of malignancy, and non-relapse mortality following alloHCT, even in the era of pre-emptive antiviral management. CMV serostatus thus remains an important consideration for patients undergoing alloHCT. We review the clinical impact of CMV in the setting of alloHCT, interactions between CMV serostatus, viral reactivation, and transplant outcomes, as well as current and evolving strategies for prevention and treatment of CMV-related complications that may have significant impact for alloHCT recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Cytomegalovirus ( CMV) continues to be an important complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and solid organ transplantation. Methods In this study, 314 patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between January 2003 and October 2011 were tested serially for CMV DNA by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction ( qPCR) for 90 days post transplantation. Patients with CMV viremia >3000 genomes/mL (equivalent to 2520 IU/mL) received pre-emptive therapy and were compared with previously published data from solid organ transplant ( SOT) patients monitored and treated in exactly the same way. Results After stem cell transplant ( SCT), 48% of patients developed at least 1 episode of viremia. The median duration of a viremic episode was 25 days and the peak viral load ( VL) was 4784 genomes/mL whole blood (equivalent to 4019 IU/mL). The data demonstrated that recipients with positive CMV serostatus were at increased risk of developing viremia, with 0% of donor-negative/recipient-negative (D−R−), 3.7% of D+R−, 79.5% of D−R+, and 74.2% of D+R+ groups developing viremia over follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio for D+R− vs. D+R+ group 0.03; 95% confidence interval 0.004, 0.18; P = 0.0013). In contrast with SOT patients, where 58/74 (78%) D+R− patients had viremia, a low risk of CMV infection was seen after stem cell transplantation (1/27; 3.7%). Conclusion As both groups of patients, the previously published SOT patients and the present hematopoietic SCT patients, were monitored using the same protocol and qPCR assay with pre-emptive therapy administered at the same VL cutoffs, the distinct differences seen cannot be explained by differences in testing or management and thus emphasize distinct aspects of the natural history of CMV infection post transplant in these 2 patient groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cytomegalovirus is the most important pathogen causing opportunistic infections in kidney allograft recipients. The occurrence of CMV disease is associated with higher morbidity, higher incidence of other opportunistic infections, allograft loss and death. Therefore, an efficient strategy to prevent CMV disease after kidney transplantation is required. Two options are currently available: pre-emptive therapy based on regular CMV PCR monitoring and generalized antiviral prophylaxis during a defined period. In this review, we describe those two approaches, highlight the distinct advantages and risks of each strategy and summarize the four randomized controlled trials performed in this field so far. Taken this evidence together, pre-emptive therapy and anti-CMV prophylaxis are both equally potent in preventing CMV-associated complications; however, the pre-emptive approach may have distinct advantages in allowing for development of long-term anti- CMV immunity. We propose a risk-adapted use of these approaches based on serostatus, immunosuppressive therapy and availability of resources at a particular transplant centre. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Pre-emptive therapy with valganciclovir (VGCV) has become the standard therapy for preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The effectiveness of low-dose VGCV (900 mg per day) has been shown to be equal to that of standard-dose VGCV (900 mg twice daily); however, individualized optimal dosing and toxicity of VGCV have not been reported. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the optimal dose of VGCV as pre-emptive therapy for preventing CMV infection by comparing the frequency of adverse events (AEs) and clinical efficacy in a low-dose VGCV group with those in a standard-dose VGCV group. Thirty-eight patients who were administered VGCV because of CMV antigenemia after HSCT were analyzed. Results. Neutropenia (standard-dose group: 33%, low-dose group: 15%, P = 0.26) and thrombocytopenia (standard-dose group: 39%, low-dose group: 15%, P = 0.14) were frequent AEs of VGCV, and a significantly higher frequency of overall AEs was detected in the standard-dose group than in the low-dose group (P < 0.01). In comparison of dosage based on weight, dosage of VGCV >27 mg/kg was closely related to onset of AEs (P = 0.04). Conclusions. Low-dose VGCV was not inferior in clinical efficacy, including clearance rate of CMV antigenemia and incidence of consequent CMV disease, to standard-dose VGCV as was previously reported. Initial low-dose VGCV for pre-emptive CMV therapy markedly reduces hematologic toxicity and has clinical efficacy equivalent to that of standard-dose VGCV. It is therefore reasonable for patients, except for noticeably overweight patients, to be given initial low-dose VGCV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Preemptive antiviral therapy relies on viral load measurements and is the mainstay of cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. However, optimal CMV levels for the initiation of preemptive therapy have not been defined. Objectives The objectives of our work were to evaluate the relationship between plasma CMV DNA levels at initiation of preemptive therapy with time to resolution of viremia and duration of treatment. Study design Retrospective analysis of HCT recipients undergoing serial CMV PCR testing between June 2011 and June 2014 was performed. Results 221 HCT recipients underwent preemptive therapy for 305 episodes of CMV viremia. Median time to resolution was shorter when treatment was initiated at lower CMV levels (15 days at 135–440 international units (IU)/mL, 18 days at 441–1000 IU/mL, and 21 days at >1000 IU/mL, P < .001). Prolonged viremia lasting >30 days occurred less frequently when treatment was initiated at 135–440 IU/mL compared to 441–1000 IU/mL and >1000 IU/mL (1%, 15%, 24%, P < .001). Median treatment duration was also shorter in the lower viral load groups (28, 34, 37 days, P < .001). Conclusion Initiation of preemptive therapy at low CMV levels was associated with shorter episodes of viremia and courses of antiviral therapy. These data support the utility of initiating preemptive CMV therapy at viral loads as low as 135 IU/mL in HCT recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder ( PTLD) remains a common complication of liver and bowel transplantion. The ubiquity of Epstein-Barr virus ( EBV) combined with engraftment of organs rich with lymphatic tissue and the requirement of highly immunosuppressive regimens are factors that account for the high frequency and poor prognosis of PTLD in this population. Early detection of the virus followed by pre-emptive reduction of immunosuppression are essential components in the management of PTLD, but can increase the risk of graft loss. More recently, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) has been shown to improve survival in various transplant populations with PTLD, while other therapeutic options, such as chemotherapy, surgery or radiotherapy, have minimal clinical impact. EBV-directed cytotoxic T cells have shown promise in the management of PTLD but clinical use is currently limited by lack of technical facilities worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human cytomegalovirus ( HCMV) is a recognized cause of disease in the fetus, the allograft recipient and AIDS patients. More recently, it has been recognized as a pathogen for those admitted to intensive care units, for the elderly and for the general population. The epidemiology and molecular and cellular pathology of this virus are summarized to provide an overarching model of pathogenesis, able to account for these varying clinical presentations. In brief, HCMV has the potential to spread in the bloodstream to all organs, but only produces overt disease if the viral load increases to high levels. This is normally prevented by a robust immune response, so that the infected individual usually remains asymptomatic. However, this benefit comes at the cost of committing more and more immunological resources to controlling HCMV with time, so that the overall function of the immune system is impaired. Fortunately, recent progress in developing novel antiviral drugs and vaccines suggests the possibility that the diverse effects of HCMV may soon become controllable at the individual and population level, respectively. Copyright © 2014 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In acute leukemia, advances have been made in therapeutic strategies centered on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), three of which are presented here. The indication of allo-SCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 1 st complete remission (CR1) has been debated. Genomic medicine has helped us gain a deeper understanding of this disease, some of which may serve as prognostic factors. Such genetic abnormalities could also help measure minimal residual disease (MRD) and provide additional clues to estimate the efficacy of chemotherapy. Combined with existing prognostic factors, these data can be used to construct a more accurate prognostic model, providing an optimal indication of allo-SCT for AML in CR1. Furthermore, overall treatment algorithms for high-risk AML after allo-SCT should include prophylactic and pre-emptive treatment to prevent relapse. These include immunotherapy using donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), FLT3 inhibitors in FLT3 -mutated AML, hypomethylating agents, or a combination of DLI with these agents. Clinical trials are currently ongoing to elucidate the role of these strategies, which will lead to a risk-adapted treatment for preventing relapse in high-risk AML. CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy induces a remarkable response in B-acute lymphoid leukemia (B-ALL); however, relapse remains a major problem. In this regard, allo-SCT as a consolidation treatment after CAR-T cell therapy for B-ALL is recommended for pediatric and adult patients. Achieving complete remission (CR) with CAR-T cell therapy is considered a promising bridging therapy to allo-SCT. Novel CAR-T treatment techniques are being developed to change their role as a pre-transplant treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available on the website. AV is one of the Editor of Blood Cell Therapy. He was not involved in the editorial evaluation or accept this article for publication., (Copyright Ⓒ2022 Asia-Pacific Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group (APBMT).)

The article presents author's views on stem cell transplantation in case of pneumonitis caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV). Topics discussed include immunopathological components and cell culture confirmation, diagnosis of CMV from lung biopsy findings, and monoclonal antibodies and cell culture confirmation.

The article focuses on preventive treatment approaches to cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Transplantion results and cost for the prevention of CMV reactivation with vaccines and antiviral T cells are examined. Outcomes and treatment cost in 44 patients who never required pre-emptive CMV treatment are compared with 90 treated patients undergoing SCT. Treatment should be given within 1 week of SCT to prevent CMV reactivation.

Fungal infections are common in critically ill patients and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Candida spp are the most commonly isolated fungal pathogens. The last 2 decades have seen an increased incidence of fungal infections in critical illness and the emergence of new pathogenic fungal species and also the development of more effective (better bioavailability) and safer (less toxicity, fewer drug interactions) drugs. The distinction between colonization and infection can be difficult, and problems diagnosing infection may delay initiation of antifungal treatment. A number of factors have been identified that can help to distinguish patients at high risk for fungal infection. The antifungal agents that are most frequently used in the intensive care unit are the first- and second-generation azoles and the echinocandins; amphotericin B derivatives (mainly the liposomal agents) are less widely used because of adverse effects. The choice of antifungal agent in critically ill patients will depend on the aim of therapy (prophylaxis, pre-emptive, empiric, definitive), as well as on local epidemiology and specific properties of the drug (antifungal spectrum, efficacy, toxicity, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, cost). In this article we will review all these aspects and propose an algorithm to guide selection of antifungal agents in critically ill patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For two centuries, vaccines have been successful in the fight against viruses, triggering immune protection. Indeed, the elimination of smallpox, the only infectious disease eradicated to date, was made possible through vaccination. For measles, polio and hepatitis B, vaccines are available but significant challenges exist for universal coverage. For other viruses, such as HIV and hepatitis C, vaccines have remained elusive. Recent advances in medicinal chemistry have resulted in the production of antivirals that can extend activity for months. We envision the use of ultra-long-acting antivirals for the prevention of certain viral illnesses, halting either contagions or reactivations under immunosuppression. Such 'chemical vaccines' would fill an immediate need in providing protection when classic vaccines do not exist, responses are suboptimal, escape mutants emerge or immunity wanes.