Search

9553 Background: RP1 is an enhanced potency oncolytic version of HSV1 that expresses human GM-CSF and the fusogenic protein GALV-GP R-. IGNYTE is a multicohort phase 1/2 study that evaluates the safety and efficacy of RP1 in combination with nivo (NCT03767348) in a range of tumor types. Preliminary data demonstrated a durable anti-tumor activity and tolerability for RP1+nivo. Here, we present updated results from the initial and melanoma (mel) and anti-PD1 naïve non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) cohorts with RP1+nivo. Methods: RP1 is administered via intratumoral injection Q2W, up to 10 mL/visit, first alone at a dose of 106 PFU/mL and then starting with the 2nd dose at 107 PFU/mL in combination with nivo (240 mg IV Q2W for 4 months (mos) then 480 mg IV Q4W up to 2 yrs) for up to 8 doses, with the option to re-initiate RP-1. Eligible patients (pts) must have at least one measurable & injectable tumor of ≥ 1 cm, ECOG 0-1, and no prior oncolytic therapy. For mel, both anti-PD1 naïve and failed pts were eligible, for NMSC pts who were anti-PD1 naïve. Results: As of data extraction on January 31, 2022, 13/36 pts with mel (36.1%) and 19/31 pts with NMSC (61.3%) had a best response of PR or CR. For mel this was 5/8 (62.5%), 6/16 (37.5%), 0/6 and 2/6 (33.3%) for pts with anti-PD1 naïve cutaneous, anti-PD1/anti-PD1+anti-CTLA-4 failed cutaneous, uveal and mucosal mel respectively. For the anti-PD1 naïve NMSC this included 11/17 (64.7%), 1/4 (25%), 3/4 (75%) and 4/6 (66.6%) patients with CSCC, BCC, MCC and angiosarcoma respectively, including 8/17 (47.1%) being CR for CSCC. Current immature median DOR was 13.27 mos (current range 3.67-16.93 mos) for mel, and 7.32 mos (current range 1.88-23.11mos) for anti-PD1 naïve NMSC. Any grade TEAE ( > 25%) in all cohorts combined were fatigue, nausea, pyrexia, chills, diarrhoea, pruritus, and influenza-like illness. TEAE ≥grade 3 ( > 5%) were disease progression and fatigue. No deaths related to RP1 was observed, with one death related to nivo (myocarditis). Biomarker data from paired biopsies indicated robust T cell infiltration and an increase in tumor inflammation gene signature post-treatment. Clinical responses observed were independent of baseline tumor PD-L1 expression status. Conclusions: RP1 in combination with nivo provides a durable anti-tumor activity in pts with skin cancers, including anti-PD1 failed and anti-PD1/anti-CTLA-4 failed mel. The combination continued to be generally well tolerated with no new safety signals identified. Based on this data, enrollment into both a registration-directed cohort of pts who have anti-PD1 failed cutaneous mel (n = 125) and a cohort of pts with anti-PD1 failed NMSC (n = 30) is ongoing. Up-to-date data from this ongoing trial will be reported at the conference. A randomized Ph2 trial of RP1+cemiplimab vs. cemiplimab alone in anti-PD1 naïve NMSC is also underway (NCT04050436). Clinical trial information: NCT03767348.

TPS2705 Background: RP3 is a genetically modified herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) that contains insertions for the gibbon ape leukemia virus surface glycoprotein (GALV-GP) with the R- sequence deleted (R-), an anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody-like molecule, CD40 ligand, and 4-1BB ligand. Together, these insertions are expected to increase oncolytic potency, cell-to-cell spread, immunogenic cell death, and systemic immune activation. RP3 has demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical models using viruses similar to RP3 expressing murine versions of anti-CTLA-4, CD40L, and 4-1BBL both alone and in combination with PD1-1 blockade. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, Phase 1 study evaluating RP3 as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab (nivo) in patients (pts) with solid tumors (NCT04735978). Part 1 evaluated escalating doses of RP3. Pts in Part 1 received IT injections of up to 10 mL RP3 into superficial, nodal, or visceral lesions Q2W x 5 across two dose levels (DL1: 105 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL once, then 106 PFU/mL x 4; DL2: 106 PFU/mL once, then 107 PFU/mL x4). The RP2D is 106 PFU/mL once, followed by 107 PFU/mL IT Q2W. In Part 2, pts are being enrolled into expansion cohorts of 45 patients with GI (including HCC), lung, breast, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with RP1 combined with nivo. Additional cohorts will enroll patients treated with RP3 followed by nivo, RP3 monotherapy to further explore biomarkers in injected and uninjected tumors, and with the potential to also open a cohort in melanoma. Pts in both Part 1 and Part 2 may receive up to 8 additional doses of RP3 if protocol-specified criteria are met. Key inclusion criteria: confirmed advanced or metastatic non-neurological solid tumors, at least one measurable tumor ≥ 1 cm and injectable tumors ≥ 1 cm in aggregate, ECOG ≤1, and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. In Cohorts 1, 2, and 4, approximately 50% of the pts with lung, breast, and GI cancer must have liver lesions intended for injection. Exclusion criteria include prior oncolytic virus treatment, need for immunosuppressive therapy, an autoimmune disease requiring systemic therapy, active significant herpetic infections or prior complications of HSV-1 infection, active or chronic HBV or HCV infection, known HIV infection, or prior active malignancy within 3 years. Clinical trial information: NCT04735978.

TPS2704 Background: RP2 is a selective replication-competent herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) that contains a codon-optimized sequence for human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), the gibbon ape leukemia virus surface glycoprotein (GALV-GP) with the R- sequence deleted (R-), GM-CSF, and an anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody-like molecule. These modifications are intended to increase oncolytic potency, cell-to-cell spread, tumor antigen release, and systemic anti-tumor immune activation. RP2 has demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical models using viruses similar to RP2 expressing murine versions of anti-CTLA-4 and GM-CSF, both alone and in combination with PD1-1 blockade. Methods: This is a Phase 1 multicenter, open-label, study evaluating RP2 ± nivolumab (NCT04336241). Part 1 evaluated escalating doses of monotherapy RP2 with a modified 3 + 3 design. Patients (pts) received intratumoral (IT) injections of up to 10 mL of RP2 into superficial or visceral tumors Q2W x5 across two dose levels (DL1: 105 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL once, then followed by 106 PFU/mL x4; DL 2: 106 PFU/mL once, then followed by 107 PFU/mL x4). The recommended Phase 2 dose of RP2 was identified as 106 PFU/mL once, followed by subsequent doses of 1 × 107 PFU/mL. In Part 2, up to 60 evaluable pts will be enrolled, including 30 pts in Cohort 2a and 30 in Cohort 2b. Cohort 2a was designed to evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of the combination in pts with solid tumors, and is fully enrolled. Cohort 2b is open for enrollment of pts with advanced or metastatic uveal melanoma, NSCLC, breast cancer, head and neck cancer or GI cancers (NSCLC, breast or GI cancers must have at least one liver tumor suitable for injection). Pts in Part 2 receive intra-tumoral RP2 at the RP2D Q2W for up to 8 doses in combination with 240 mg nivolumab IV Q2W or 480 mg nivolumab IV Q4W for up to two years from the first RP2 dose. In Part 3 (not yet open for enrollment), up to 15 evaluable pts are able to be enrolled to evaluate RP2 monotherapy including at least 10 pts with NSCLC, breast or GI cancers with at least one liver tumor suitable for injection. Reinitiation of up to 8 additional RP2 doses is permitted if prespecified criteria are met. Pts are dosed with RP2 by direct visualization or ultrasound-guided injection into superficial, subcutaneous, or nodal tumors and by image-guided injection into deeper lesions, including visceral lesions. Key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic non-neurological solid tumors, at least one measurable and injectable tumor of diameter ≥1 cm, ECOG ≤1, and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. Exclusion criteria include prior treatment with oncolytic viruses, acute or chronic hepatitis B or C infection, and HIV infections. Clinical trial information: NCT04336241.

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment; however, a significant fraction of patients exhibit resistance to immunotherapy, in part due to the lack of an inflamed (“hot”) tumor microenvironment. Seeking to recruit immune cells to tumors lacking immune cell infiltration (“cold” tumors), we observed that intratumoral injection of heat-inactivated influenza, but not live influenza, slows growth of B16-F10 melanoma in C57BL/6 mice (p

Talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC), an oncolytic virus, is an FDA-approved therapy that increases the overall survival of locally advanced and metastatic melanoma patients. Radiation therapy (RT) in combination with immunotherapies improves response rates (compared to either modality alone). Therefore, we hypothesized that combination RT and TVEC results in a synergistic therapeutic effect on melanoma. We treated 8 human melanoma cell lines with radiation (0, 4, or 8 Gy) and/or T-VEC (0, 0.01, 0.1, or 1 MOI) and determined its therapeutic effects using the AlamarBlue cell viability assay. Treatment of UACC257 melanoma cells with combination RT (8 Gy) and TVEC (1 MOI) resulted in a significant decrease in tumor cell viability (a decrease of 44.9%) compared to no treatment, RT alone (33.2%, P=0.0004), or T-VEC alone (24.2%, P=0.0088), with similar findings in other cell lines. We then injected a B16 mouse melanoma cell line, permissive to T-VEC infection, into B6 mice to assess in vivo synergy. Mice were treated when tumors were ~7mm × 7mm. RT resulted in an early 20% decrease in tumor size within 4 days, followed by an increase thereafter. Intra-tumoral TVEC resulted in no clear benefit until 9 days post-treatment, when it showed a slight decrease in size sustained for ~10 days. Combination treatment, however, led to an early response that was sustained until 18 days after the initial treatment. When tumors were assessed 18 days after initial treatment, a 3-fold or more increase in tumor size was lowest in the combination T-VEC + RT group (17%) compared to the control (100%), RT (60%), or TVEC (50%) groups. These data propose that combination T-VEC + RT may be beneficial for cancer patients, and studies establishing the mechanism of synergy are ongoing.