Search

Background: Use of artificial intelligence to generate personal statements for residency is currently not permitted but is difficult to monitor. This study sought to evaluate the ability of surgical residency application reviewers to identify artificial intelligence-generated personal statements and to understand perceptions of this practice., Methods: Three personal statements were generated using ChatGPT, and 3 were written by medical students who previously matched into surgery residency. Blinded participants at a single institution were instructed to read all personal statements and identify which were generated by artificial intelligence; they then completed a survey exploring their opinions regarding artificial intelligence use., Results: Of the 30 participants, 50% were faculty (n = 15) and 50% were residents (n = 15). Overall, experience ranged from 0 to 20 years (median, 2 years; interquartile range, 1-6.25 years). Artificial intelligence-derived personal statements were identified correctly only 59% of the time, with 3 (10%) participants identifying all the artificial intelligence-derived personal statements correctly. Artificial intelligence-generated personal statements were labeled as the best 60% of the time and the worst 43.3% of the time. When asked whether artificial intelligence use should be allowed in personal statements writing, 66.7% (n = 20) said no and 30% (n = 9) said yes. When asked if the use of artificial intelligence would impact their opinion of an applicant, 80% (n = 24) said yes, and 20% (n = 6) said no. When survey questions and ability to identify artificial intelligence-generated personal statements were evaluated by faculty/resident status and experience, no differences were noted (P > .05)., Conclusion: This study shows that surgical faculty and residents cannot reliably identify artificial intelligence-generated personal statements and that concerns exist regarding the impact of artificial intelligence on the application process., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest/Disclosure The authors have no relevant financial disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgery is the mainstay of therapy for thyroid cancer. A rising number of patients decline recommended surgical intervention. This study aimed to identify factors associated with the decision to decline surgery for well-differentiated thyroid cancer., Methods: Patients with papillary or follicular thyroid cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Patients were grouped based on patient-documented refusal of recommended surgery and patients who successfully completed surgery. Baseline characteristic comparison, univariable and multivariable logistic regression, and survival analyses were performed., Results: A total of 221,664 patients met inclusion criteria: 565 (0.3%) patients declined and 221,099 (99.7%) underwent recommended surgery. Patients who declined surgery were older, male, Black or Asian, and not privately insured. They more frequently had Charlson-Deyo scores ≥3, were diagnosed at academic centers, and presented with larger tumors and advanced clinical stage. Multivariable modeling demonstrated that older age, Black or Asian race, diagnosis at an academic center, no insurance or lack of private insurance, clinical N stage ≥1a, and clinical M stage >0 were associated with higher odds of declining surgery (P < .001). A mean survival of 10 years was found among patients who declined surgery versus 16 years among patients who underwent surgery (P < .0001)., Conclusion: Most patients diagnosed with well-differentiated thyroid cancer undergo physician-recommended surgical intervention. Declining surgery is associated with worse overall survival and is more likely in older, male, Black, or Asian patients with socioeconomic disadvantage. This study underscores the importance of understanding barriers to thyroid cancer surgery and opportunities to optimize outcomes and reduce disparities for these populations., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest/Disclosure The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: In 2016, the Choosing Wisely campaign published guidelines recommending omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically node-negative women ≥70 years with early-stage (cT1-2), hormone receptor-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of this guideline., Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried from 2017 to 2020. All patients who met criteria for lymph node surgery omission were included and compared with those who underwent lymph node surgery., Results: Of 138,648 patients who met criteria for lymph node surgery omission, 26,070 (21.0%) had lymph node surgery omission and 109,482 (79.0%) underwent lymph node surgery. Those who had lymph node surgery omission were older (median 79 [75-84] vs 75 [72-79] years, P < .01) and had increased comorbidities (28.3% with Charlson/Deyo score ≥3 had lymph node surgery omission vs 20.2% with score 0, P < .01). Academic/research institutions most frequently practiced lymph node surgery omission (25.8% vs 16.5% community cancer programs, 19.3% comprehensive community cancer programs, and 20.6% integrated network cancer programs, P < .01). A greater percentage of lymph node surgery omission was noted with ductal carcinoma (21.4% vs 17.6% lobular and 19.4% mixed, P < .01) and lower-grade tumors (21.7% of grade 1 vs 19.4% of grade 2 and 17.8% of grade 3, P < .01). Throughout the period studied, the overall rate of lymph node surgery omission increased from 17.7% in 2017 to 23.1% in 2020 (P < .01)., Conclusion: Despite the evidence-based Choosing Wisely guideline recommending lymph node surgery omission in selected patients with breast cancer, more than 75% of patients meeting criteria were still being subjected to lymph node surgery as of 2020. Future work is warranted to determine factors affecting implementation of the Choosing Wisely guideline., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest/Disclosure Dr Alicia Heelan is a consultant for Elucent, and Dr Jaime Lewis is a consultant for Elucent and ProvePharm, although these disclosures are not applicable to our work. There are no other conflicts to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Choosing Wisely ® (CW) campaign recommended de-implementation of surgical management of axillary nodes in specified patients. This study aimed to assess trends in the application of CW guidelines for lymph node (LN) surgery in males with breast cancer., Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for males diagnosed with breast cancer from 2017 to 2020. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on CW criteria. Cohort 1 included all T1-2, clinically node-negative patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy and with ≤ 2 positive nodes, and Cohort 2 included all T1-2, node-negative, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patients aged ≥ 70 years. In Cohort 1, patients who underwent sentinel LN biopsy (SLNB) alone were compared with axillary LN dissection (ALND) or no LN surgery, while in Cohort 2, patients who underwent LN surgery were compared with those with no LN surgery., Results: Of 617 patients who met the criteria for Cohort 1, 73.1% underwent SLNB alone compared with ALND (11.8%) or no LN surgery (15.1%). Those who received SLNB alone were younger (65 vs. 68 vs. 73 years; p < 0.001). The annual proportion of males who underwent SLNB alone remained stable from 2017 to 2020. Overall, 1565 patients met the criteria for Cohort 2, and 84.9% received LN surgery. LN surgery was omitted in older patients (81 vs. 77; p < 0.001). The proportion of elderly males with early-stage breast cancer who underwent LN surgery increased from 2017 to 2020., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that CW recommendations are not being routinely applied to males. These findings reinforce the need for additional studies and subsequent recommendations for optimal application of axillary surgery de-implementation for males diagnosed with breast cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Recent studies have evaluated patient perception of physician attire; however, few studies have considered physician perceptions of workplace attire. This study aimed to assess current trends regarding attire preferences among surgeons., Methods: A national, population-based survey was distributed via email and "X" (Twitter). Participants were asked to complete an online questionnaire regarding their perception of the white coat, preferred attire in clinical settings, and reasons for choice of attire., Results: Of 481 participants, 172 (36%) were attendings, 164 (34%) were residents, 125 (26%) were medical students, and 20 (4%) were fellows. Those who practiced in the Midwest region were more likely to wear a white coat daily (35.1% versus 28.5% South, 23.5% Northeast, 20.0% West, P < 0.05). Late career surgeons (practicing >20 y) were more likely to wear a white coat in the hospital and wear it daily (56% versus 36% of middle-career surgeons, 34% early-career surgeons, and 26% in training, P < 0.05). Women surgeons more frequently wore a white coat in clinic (64% versus 54% men, P < 0.05), reported that wearing a white coat was influenced by their program's culture (61% versus 46% of men surgeons, P < 0.05), that they would stop wearing a white coat if other members of their department stopped (50% versus 35% of men, P < 0.05), and that they believe the white coat helps distinguish female doctors from nurses (61% versus 50% of men surgeons, P < 0.05)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates generational, regional, and gender differences among surgeons in their perception of the white coat at a national level., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The demand for liver transplants (LT) in the United States far surpasses the availability of allografts. New allocation schemes have resulted in occasional difficulties with allograft placement and increased intraoperative turndowns. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes related to use of late-turndown liver allografts., Methods: A review of prospectively collected data of LTs at a single center from July 2019 to July 2023 was performed. Late-turndown placement was defined as an open offer 6 h prior to donation, intraoperative turndown by primary center, or post-cross-clamp turndown., Results: Of 565 LTs, 25.1% (n = 142) received a late-turndown liver allograft. There were no significant differences in recipient age, gender, BMI, or race (all p > 0.05), but MELD was lower for the late-turndown LT recipient group (median 15 vs 21, p < 0.001). No difference in 30-day, 6-month, or 1-year survival was noted on logistic regression, and no difference in patient or graft survival was noted on Cox proportional hazard regression. Late-turndown utilization increased during the study from 17.2% to 25.8%, and median waitlist time decreased from 77 days in 2019 to 18 days in 2023 (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Use of late-turndown livers has increased and can increase transplant rates without compromising post-transplant outcomes with appropriate selection., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None declared., (Copyright © 2024 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Residency interviews have traditionally been conducted in person; however, COVID-19 forced programs to shift to virtual interviewing. This study delineated the nationwide trends observed after virtual interviewing across multiple application cycles on both surgical residency applicant competitiveness and program workload., Methods: Publicly available National Residency Matching Program applicant and program data were retrospectively reviewed. Applicant competitiveness was assessed using a validated competitive index (# positions ranked/match rate). Interview types included in-person (2010-2020) or virtual (2021-2023), and programs were classified as general surgery (GS), surgical subspecialty (SS) - orthopedics, otolaryngology and neurosurgery, and integrated specialty (IS) - plastic, thoracic, and vascular surgery., Results: When comparing in-person to virtual cohorts, the competitive index has increased in GS (0.97 ± 0.00 to 1.05 ± 0.01, P < 0.001), SS (0.97 ± 0.02 to 1.06 ± 0.01 P < 0.001), and IS (0.93 ± 0.06 to 1.12 ± 0.03, P = 0.001). United Sates Medical Licensing Examination Step scores and research experiences increased over time in GS and SS (P < 0.05). Program workload, represented by number of applications received per program increased in GS, IS, and SS (P < 0.05), as well as the number of interviews conducted in GS and SS (P < 0.05). Importantly, match rate remained stable in GS and IS, with a decrease in SS (0.69 ± 0.03 to 0.63 ± 0.02, P = 0.04)., Conclusions: The residency application process has been irrevocably changed due to COVID-19. The rise in applicant volume and competitiveness places unique strains on applicants and programs. Additional modifications such as signaling and ACGME guidance are needed to help alleviate strain and ensure that residents and programs alike find their best fit., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Underrepresented minority patients with surgical malignancies experience disparities in outcomes. The impact of provider-based factors, including communication, trust, and cultural competency, on outcomes is not well understood. This study examines modifiable provider-based barriers to care experienced by patients with surgical malignancies., Methods: A parallel, prospective, mixed-methods study enrolled patients with lung or gastrointestinal malignancies undergoing surgical consultation. Surveys assessed patients' social needs and patient-physician relationship. Semi-structured interviews ascertained patient experiences and were iteratively analyzed, identifying key themes., Results: The cohort included 24 patients (age 62 years; 63% White and 38% Black/African American). The most common cancers were lung (n = 18, 75%) and gastroesophageal (n = 3, 13%). Survey results indicated that food insecurity (n = 5, 21%), lack of reliable transportation (n = 4, 17%), and housing instability (n = 2, 8%) were common. Lack of trust in their physician (n = 3, 13%) and their physician's treatment recommendation (n = 3, 13%) were identified. Patients reported a lack of empathy (n = 3, 13%), lack of cultural competence (n = 3, 13%), and inadequate communication (n = 2, 8%) from physicians. Qualitative analysis identified five major themes regarding the decision to undergo surgery: communication, trust, health literacy, patient fears, and decision-making strategies. Five patients (21%) declined the recommended surgery and were more likely Black (100% vs. 21%), lower income (100% vs. 16%), and reported poor patient-physician relationship (40% vs. 5%; all p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Factors associated with declining recommended cancer surgery were underrepresented minority race and poor patient-physician relationships. Interventions are needed to improve these barriers to care and racial disparities., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: The implementation of acuity circles (AC) in 2020 and the COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of local surgeons to recover livers for transplant; however, the impact on liver transplant (LT) outcomes is unknown., Methods: Deceased donor adult LT recipients from the UNOS database were identified.  Recipients were grouped by donor surgeon: local versus primary recovery.  Patient and graft survival as well as trends in local recovery in the 2 years pre-AC and post-AC were assessed., Results: The utilization of local recovery in LT increased from 22.3% to 37.9% post-AC (p < 0.01).  LTs with local recovery had longer cold ischemia times (6.5 h [5.4-7.8] vs. 5.3 h [4.4-6.5], p < 0.01) and traveled further (210 miles [89-373] vs. 73 miles [11-196], p < 0.01) than those using primary recovery. Multivariate analyses revealed no differences in patient or graft survival between local and primary recovery, and between OPO and local surgeon. There was no difference in survival when comparing simultaneous liver-kidney, donation after circulatory death, MELD ≥ 30, or redo-LT by recovery team.  Recovery and utilization rates were also noted to be higher post-AC (51.4% vs. 48.6% pre-AC, p < 0.01) as well as when OPO surgeons recovered the allografts (72.5% vs. 66.0%, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: Nearly 40% of LTs are performed using local recovery, and utilization rates and trends continue to change with changing organ-sharing paradigms such as AC.  This practice appears safe with outcomes similar to recovery by the primary team in appropriately selected recipients and may lead to increased access and the ability to transplant more livers., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Socioeconomic status and pollution exposure have been described as risk factors for poor survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the relationship between these factors is complex and inadequately studied. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between environmental and social factors and their impact on survival after NSCLC resection., Methods: A prospective database for all patients with NSCLC who underwent primary resection from 2006 to 2021 was analyzed. Ambient fine particulate matter (air pollution smaller than 2.5 μm [PM 2.5 ]), greenness, and deprivation index (a measure of neighborhood-level material deprivation composed of 6 factors) were linked to individual patients by geocoding their residential address., Results: A total of 661 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for NSCLC were evaluated. Black patients had increased levels of community deprivation compared with White patients; however, there was no difference in PM 2.5 exposure or overall survival between races. Increased PM 2.5 exposure was an independent predictor of worse survival on univariable and multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.06; P  = .003)., Conclusions: Increased PM 2.5 exposure is associated with worse overall survival in resected NSCLC and was a more significant factor than race and material deprivation in this population. Interventions to reduce environmental air pollution could improve lung cancer survival.

Purpose of Review: While liver transplant for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) has been demonstrated to be a promising treatment in selected patients, the typically low MELD score of these patients and lack of exception points may lead to challenges in receiving a deceased donor liver for transplant., Recent Findings: Several studies have shown improved outcomes in select patients with CRLM who undergo liver transplant, and several trials are ongoing and will conclude in the next several years. MELD exception points have recently been proposed in qualifying patients with CRLM to help this group obtain more timely quality allografts. Under the current proposal, patients with CRLM would receive a score of the median MELD at transplant (MMaT) for their center minus 20 with a minimum score of 15 in cases where MMaT minus 20 would be less than 15. This would allow them to receive transplants faster without competing unnecessarily with those with greater medical need., Summary: Giving MELD exception points to patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases in need of transplant may decrease time on the waitlist and improve outcomes for these patients., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited data exist regarding the optimal locoregional approach for males with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). This study examined trends in management and survival for males with DCIS., Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for males with a diagnosis of DCIS from 2006 to 2017. Patients were categorized by locoregional management. Continuous variables were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis and categorical variables by chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate for predictors of patients receiving partial mastectomy (PM) with radiation. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier., Results: Between 2006 and 2017, 711 males with DCIS were identified. Most received mastectomy alone (57.1%). No change was observed in management approach from 2006 to 2017. Patients who underwent mastectomy alone were mostly hormone-positive (95.9% were estrogen-positive, 90.9% were progesterone-positive), although this cohort was least likely to receive hormone therapy (17.2%). Among those who underwent PM with radiation, only 61% of those who were hormone-positive received hormone therapy. Univariable analysis demonstrated that those of black race had lower odds of receiving PM with radiation (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.84), which persisted in the multivariable analysis with control for age and tumor size (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15-0.67). Overall survival did not differ significantly between the four treatment methods (p = 0.08)., Conclusions: The management approach to male DCIS did not change from 2006 to 2017. Survival did not differ between treatment methods. Demographic and clinicopathologic features, including race, may influence locoregional treatments received, and further studies are needed to further understand this., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is considered a biologically aggressive disease for which surgical resection remains the only curative treatment. Preoperative evaluation for resectability is challenging given tumor proximity to the porta hepatis, but minimal benefit and increased morbidity precludes recommendation for margin positive resection. This article reviews the determination of unresectability in hilar cholangiocarcinoma through discussion of the preoperative assessment, the intraoperative assessment, and key steps of surgical resection, as well as treatment options for unresectable tumors. Overall, evaluating patients preoperatively for resectability requires a multidisciplinary, holistic, and individualized approach to accurately determine resectability and optimize clinical outcomes for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Breast infections are common, affect women of all ages, and are associated with significant morbidity. Despite overall prevalence, treatment varies significantly based on provider or institution and no central treatment guidelines exist to direct the management of breast infections. This article provides a summary of the current trends in management of breast infections. The etiology, epidemiology, risk factors, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of mastitis and breast abscesses (and their relative subdivisions) are explored based on the current literature. Trends in microbiology are reviewed and an approach to antibiotic coverage is proposed. Overall, there is a lack of randomized-controlled trials focused on the treatment of breast infections. This has resulted in an absence of clinical practice guidelines for the management of breast abscesses and variable practice patterns. The development of best-care protocols or pathways could provide more uniformity in care of breast infections., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this manuscript. The authors have no funding to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)