Search

Copyright of Direito e Práxis is the property of Editora da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EdUERJ) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Jurídica (0103-3506) is the property of Revista Juridica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Opinião Jurídica is the property of Revista Opiniao Juridica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia is the property of Revista de Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Jurídica (0103-3506) is the property of Revista Juridica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Jurídica (0103-3506) is the property of Revista Juridica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Demystification of common sense and fallacious discourses on the positivist theory of Law is provided. In fact, it is wrongly understood and interpreted by specialists. The paper demonstrates that the doctrine has not been displaced, in spite of several questionings. Through theoretical research and studies on the doctrine of analytic philosophy, current analysis deals with reformulation of juridical positivism, the contingent relationship between law and ethics and the reformulation (not final debunking) of the positivist perspective in conceiving, understanding and applying the law. Current hypothesis states that there is no renewing and splitting transformation in the way one interprets and conceives Law, as suggested by the Neo-Constitutionalist doctrine. There are reformulations and adaptations of Juridical Positivism transformed into a refined Inclusive Juridical Positivism capable of reconciling Law and Morality through a contingent relationship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current theoretical research analyzes the conversion of cultural industry into a technique of mass manipulation, followed by the formatation of the individual and the denial of his individuality. The global concept of the consumer directly affected by these influxes should be investigated. Research validates the thesis that the concept of consumer is above national borders and becomes an international issue. Transnational economic vulnerability is its legitimate factor of discrimination in the wake of global consumption needs which are stimulated by the cultural industry at the service of consumerism under the guise of a greater emancipation and economic freedom of the individual. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]