Search

BackgroundWhether pembrolizumab given both before surgery (neoadjuvant therapy) and after surgery (adjuvant therapy), as compared with pembrolizumab given as adjuvant therapy alone, would increase event-free survival among patients with resectable stage III or IV melanoma is unknown.MethodsIn a phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned patients with clinically detectable, measurable stage IIIB to IVC melanoma that was amenable to surgical resection to three doses of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, surgery, and 15 doses of adjuvant pembrolizumab (neoadjuvant-adjuvant group) or to surgery followed by pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses) for approximately 1 year or until disease recurred or unacceptable toxic effects developed (adjuvant-only group). The primary end point was event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Events were defined as disease progression or toxic effects that precluded surgery; the inability to resect all gross disease; disease progression, surgical complications, or toxic effects of treatment that precluded the initiation of adjuvant therapy within 84 days after surgery; recurrence of melanoma after surgery; or death from any cause. Safety was also evaluated.ResultsAt a median follow-up of 14.7 months, the neoadjuvant-adjuvant group (154 patients) had significantly longer event-free survival than the adjuvant-only group (159 patients) (P = 0.004 by the log-rank test). In a landmark analysis, event-free survival at 2 years was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64 to 80) in the neoadjuvant-adjuvant group and 49% (95% CI, 41 to 59) in the adjuvant-only group. The percentage of patients with treatment-related adverse events of grades 3 or higher during therapy was 12% in the neoadjuvant-adjuvant group and 14% in the adjuvant-only group.ConclusionsAmong patients with resectable stage III or IV melanoma, event-free survival was significantly longer among those who received pembrolizumab both before and after surgery than among those who received adjuvant pembrolizumab alone. No new toxic effects were identified. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Merck Sharp and Dohme; S1801 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03698019.).

Introduction: Most patients with advanced gallbladder cancer are treated with multiagent chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors offer the possibility of a durable response with less toxicity. This prospective, multicenter, open‐label study was designed to evaluate the anticancer activity of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced gallbladder cancer. Methods: Nineteen patients with advanced gallbladder cancer refractory to ≥1 previous therapy received nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was confirmed radiographic overall response rate (ORR) (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] confirmed on subsequent scan); secondary end points included unconfirmed overall response, clinical benefit rate (confirmed and unconfirmed responses + stable disease >6 months), progression‐free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. Results: The confirmed ORR was 16% (CR, n = 1 [5%]; PR, n = 2 [11%]); all were microsatellite stable, and the confirmed CR had undetectable programmed death‐ligand 1 by immunohistochemistry. The unconfirmed ORR and clinical benefit rates were both 32%. The median duration of response was 14.8 months (range, 4–35.1+ months). The 6‐month progression‐free survival was 26% (95% CI, 12–55). The median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI, 3.9–19.1). The most common toxicities were fatigue (32%), anemia (26%), and anorexia (26%). Aspartate aminotransferase elevation was the most common grade 3/4 toxicity (11%). There was 1 possibly related death (sepsis with attendant hepatic failure). Conclusions: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab was well tolerated and showed modest efficacy with durable responses in previously treated patients with advanced gallbladder cancer. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02834013 (ClincialTrials.gov). Plain Language Summary: This prospective study assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 19 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer refractory to previous therapy. The combination demonstrated modest efficacy with a 16% confirmed overall response rate, durable responses, and manageable toxicities, suggesting potential benefits for this challenging patient population. Ipilimumab plus nivolumab demonstrated modest efficacy with durable responses and manageable toxicity in previously treated patients with advanced gallbladder cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

CD30 expression is the hallmark of the cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders, lymphomatoid papulosis and anaplastic large cell lymphoma. We report CD30 expression in cutaneous follicle center cell lymphoma and in cutaneous post-transplant peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Histopathologists should be aware of CD30 expression in cutaneous lymphomas outside the realm of so-called CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders to avoid diagnostic errors and improper medical treatment.

Ifosfamide is an alkylating chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of many malignancies. Ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy is one potential side effect that represents a major drawback to ifosfamide therapy and often necessitates discontinuation of chemotherapy. Previous reports demonstrate moderate effectiveness of prophylactic methylene blue at thwarting ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy. This is a report of a 64-year-old female with relapsed double-hit diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who developed severe altered mental status and neurological symptoms after receiving a second dose of ifosfamide as part of her salvage standard dose R-IE (rituximab, ifosfamide, etoposide), in preparation for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Ifosfamide was stopped and extensive metabolic and infectious workups, in addition to brain images, were all unremarkable. Her symptoms were attributed to ifosfamide. Prior to initiating cycle 2 of R-IE, she was started on prophylactic oral thiamine 100 mg, once a day, one week prior to her admission, methylene blue 50 mg intravenous every 6 h (for a total of four doses) and intravenous hydration with normal saline starting on day one of admission. Ifosfamide was administered in the standard dose 2000 mg/m2, days 1–3 as continuous intravenous infusion over 24 h. She tolerated the first two days of ifosfamide well and only developed mild encephalopathy during her last dose of ifosfamide. Her symptoms resolved completely without any intervention the following day and she completed all scheduled doses. She eventually received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Our report demonstrates the use of hydration, methylene blue, and thiamine as a successful secondary prevention regimen for ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in the development of many cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are a class of novel biologically-targeted agents widely used in the management of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. Erlotinib, one of the EGFR TKIs, is currently FDA approved in second and third line therapy. However, recent studies showed that erlotinib is also effective as maintenance therapy after initial chemotherapy, improving disease free survival and possibly overall survival. Our current understanding of erlotinib's mechanism of action, with the discovery that EGFR mutation confers higher response rate, has propelled this agent into the first line setting. Advances in molecular testing and clinical research of this agent and other agents in this class will eventually change the way we utilize EGFR TKIs in the near future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]