1. Abdominal drainage after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: out of sight, out of mind?
- Author
-
Mazzola, Michele, Benedetti, Antonio, Giani, Alessandro, Calcagno, Pietro, Zironda, Andrea, Paterno, Michele, Giacomoni, Alessandro, De Martini, Paolo, and Ferrari, Giovanni
- Subjects
- *
ABDOMINAL surgery , *MINIMALLY invasive procedures , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *LONGITUDINAL method , *PANCREATECTOMY , *MEDICAL drainage , *LENGTH of stay in hospitals , *POSTOPERATIVE period - Abstract
Backgrounds: The use of drains in pancreatic surgery remains controversial. The present study investigated postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) without intraperitoneal drain placement. Methods: Data of consecutive patients undergoing MIDP between 2013 and 2023 were prospectively collected. Patients were divided in drain group (DG), including patients with prophylactic abdominal drain placed, and no-drain group (NDG) including those without drain. The groups were compared in terms of postoperative outcomes, using a propensity score-matched analysis. Results: 116 patients were selected. After matching, DG and NDG consisted of 29 patients each. The rates of POPF and abdominal collection were lower in NDG in comparison to DG (3.4% vs. 27.6%, p 0.025 and 3.4% vs. 31.0%, p 0.011, respectively). The length of stay was significantly shorter in the NDG (5 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001). No difference between the groups was found for other outcomes. Conclusion: Drain omission was associated with lower rates of POPF and abdominal collections, as well as shorter hospital stays, not affecting the rate of severe complication, reoperation and readmission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF