Search

This article presents the incidence of heel pressure ulcers after an elective hip or a knee replacement. The majority of patients in the authors' institute receive either a neuraxial block (epidural and/or spinal) or peripheral nerve blocks (femoral and sciatic), depending on the anaesthetist's and surgeon's preference, and the patient's physical status. The past few years have seen increasing use of peripheral nerve blocks for knee replacement surgery. Patients with either the central or peripheral nerve blockade are at an increased risk of developing heel pressure ulcers. This article describes the experience at a tertiary referral centre and, in particular, highlights the risk of developing heel ulcers in patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks. Medical and nursing staff looking after these patients should be made aware of this complication and appropriate measures should be taken to prevent this avoidable complication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Guidelines are presented for the organisational and clinical peri-operative management of anaesthesia and surgery for patients who are obese, along with a summary of the problems that obesity may cause peri-operatively. The advice presented is based on previously published advice, clinical studies and expert opinion., (© 2015 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Intra-operative local anaesthetic infiltration provides good early pain relief after Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR). However, appreciable pain may occur on the day after surgery. The purpose of this double-blinded, prospective randomised controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a bolus of local intra-articular anaesthetic given early on the day after surgery. Forty-four patients were randomised to receive an intra-articular injection, via an epidural catheter inserted at operation, of either 20 ml 0.5% plain bupivacaine or 20 ml normal saline. All patients received a femoral nerve block with 20 ml prilocaine 1% and local anaesthetic infiltration by the surgeon. Patients injected with bupivacaine had significantly less (p<0.001) pain than control patients immediately (mean pain score 1.82 v 6.1) and 6 hours (2.5 v 5.7) after injection. Patient satisfaction was also significantly greater (p<0.001) in the local anaesthetic group. We conclude that a bolus dose of intra-articular bupivacaine early on the day after surgery dramatically improves pain control after UKR and improves patient satisfaction., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Faced with the concern that an increasing number of airway management devices were being introduced into clinical practice with little or no prior evidence of their clinical efficacy or safety, the Difficult Airway Society formed a working party (Airway Device Evaluation Project Team) to establish a process by which the airway management community within the profession could itself lead a process of formal device/equipment evaluation. Although there are several national and international regulations governing which products can come on to the market and be legitimately sold, there has hitherto been no formal professional guidance relating to how products should be selected (i.e. purchased). The Airway Device Evaluation Project Team's first task was to formulate such advice, emphasising evidence-based principles. Team discussions led to a definition of the minimum level of evidence needed to make a pragmatic decision about the purchase or selection of an airway device. The Team concluded that this definition should form the basis of a professional standard, guiding those with responsibility for selecting airway devices. We describe how widespread adoption of this professional standard can act as a driver to create an infrastructure in which the required evidence can be obtained. Essential elements are that: (i) the Difficult Airway Society facilitates a coherent national network of research-active units; and (ii) individual anaesthetists in hospital trusts play a more active role in local purchasing decisions, applying the relevant evidence and communicating their purchasing decisions to the Difficult Airway Society., (© 2011 The Authors. Anaesthesia © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Peripheral nerve blocks can be safely used on patients with bleeding disorder, to achieve peri-operative amalgesia.

This study compared the efficacy of an anterior jaw lift manoeuvre with that of the Berman airway in clearing the upper airway during oral fibreoptic tracheal intubation in anaesthetised, paralysed patients. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to undergo fibreoptic-assisted intubation with one method, followed by crossover to the alternative method. The time taken to view the vocal cords was the primary endpoint, and we also noted the rate of failure to view the cords, i.e. cords not seen after 120 s of endoscopy. Anterior jaw lift yielded significantly shorter times to view the vocal cords (median [interquartile range; range]: 22 [17-46; 7-120] s vs 40 [29-67; 21-120] s, p = 0.001) and a higher success rate (49/50 vs 42/50, p = 0.014). We conclude that the anterior jaw lift is more effective than the Berman device for achieving airway clearance in this setting.

This study examines the incidence and site of tracheal tube impingement during nasotracheal fibreoptic intubation, and the efficacy of anticlockwise tube rotation to overcome the problem. Forty-three patients underwent fibreoptic-assisted nasotracheal intubation using a preformed nasal tube, and a second fibrescope was used to observe any obstruction to passage of the tracheal tube. Impingement occurred in 10 cases, with the most common site being the right arytenoid cartilage. Rotation resulted in successful intubation in all 10 cases, but proximal rotation did not always result in an equal degree of rotation at the tube tip. We conclude that the site of impingement for nasotracheal intubation with preformed nasal tubes is located at the posterior structures of the laryngeal inlet and that anticlockwise rotation is a simple and effective solution.

We compared times to intubate the trachea orally and success rates using two fibreoptically assisted techniques in 42 healthy patients with normal airways using (a) a 6.0-mm nasal RAE tracheal tube passed through a classic laryngeal mask airway (CLMA group) or (b) a 6.0-mm nasal RAE tracheal tube passed through a new disposable Portex Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA group). The mean (SD) total intubation times were 82 (14) and 80 (17) s, respectively (p = 0.55). The success rates for intubation at the first attempt were similar (17/21 in the CLMA vs. 16/21 in the PLMA group; p = 0.50). We conclude that there is no clinically significant difference between the times to intubate the trachea or success rates using these two devices, but there may be other more subtle measures which might influence the choice of device in clinical practice. Finally, in the course of this study we developed a grading scale to describe the laryngeal views obtained when using a fibrescope passed through supraglottic airway devices.

Unlabelled: Problems with tracheal intubation are infrequent but are the most common cause of anaesthetic death or brain damage. The clinical situation is not always managed well. The Difficult Airway Society (DAS) has developed guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation in the non-obstetric adult patient without upper airway obstruction. These guidelines have been developed by consensus and are based on evidence and experience. We have produced flow-charts for three scenarios: routine induction; rapid sequence induction; and failed intubation, increasing hypoxaemia and difficult ventilation in the paralysed, anaesthetised patient. The flow-charts are simple, clear and definitive. They can be fully implemented only when the necessary equipment and training are available. The guidelines received overwhelming support from the membership of the DAS., Disclaimer: It is not intended that these guidelines should constitute a minimum standard of practice, nor are they to be regarded as a substitute for good clinical judgement.

Background and Objective: Unanticipated difficulty in tracheal intubation in an anaesthetized patient has always been a cause of concern to anaesthesiologists. This difficulty may lead to morbidity and mortality. This survey was carried out to determine the technique commonly favoured in centres in the Oxford region in the UK for the management of unanticipated difficult intubation., Methods: We conducted a clinical scenario-based questionnaire survey of 181 anaesthesiologists in the Oxford region. In this scenario, difficulty in endotracheal intubation is recognized only after induction of anaesthesia. A number of options were available to deal with this situation. We used this scenario as a tool to gain insight into the training and the training needs of anaesthesiologists at various levels of training., Results: Of the 181 questionnaires sent, we received 143 (79%) completed replies. The vast majority (141/143 (99%)) of anaesthesiologists would use a gum-elastic bougie together with head and neck positioning and optimal external laryngeal manipulation to gain the best attempt at intubation. If intubation still failed, overall 129/143 (90%) had a back-up plan, while 14/143 (10%) had no plan. Flexible fibreoptic techniques were more commonly planned by 92/143 (64%) anaesthesiologists compared to blind techniques which were less commonly planned by 37/143 (26%) anaesthesiologists. Differences in choice of technique among anaesthesiologists in teaching and district general hospitals were not significant (P = 0.87). Overall, trainees were less likely to choose fibreoptic techniques compared to consultants (P = 0.0009) and would use blind techniques or ask a more experienced colleague to take over. The main reason for the choice was previous experience with the technique., Conclusions: Although fibreopric techniques were most commonly planned, these were less often chosen by trainees than consultants due to lack of experience/training, while unavailability of intubating laryngeal mask airway (Intavent) was an additional issue precluding its use as an adjunct to intubation.

We studied the success rates for tracheal intubation in 64 healthy patients during simulated grade III laryngoscopy after induction of anaesthesia, using either the single-use bougie or oral flexible intubating fibrescope, both in conjunction with conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy. Patients were randomly allocated to either simulated grade IIIa or grade IIIb laryngoscopy, and also to one of the two study devices. Success rates for tracheal intubation (primary outcome measure) and times taken to achieve intubation (secondary outcome measure) were recorded. For the simulated grade IIIa laryngoscopy group, the fibreoptic scope was more successful than the bougie (16/16 successful intubations vs. 8/16; p = 0.02). For the simulated grade IIIb laryngoscopy group, the fibreoptic scope was also more successful than the bougie (8/16 successful intubations vs. 1/16; p = 0.02), but clearly use of the fibreoptic scope was not as successful as it had been in simulated grade IIIa laryngoscopy (p = 0.04). With either device, median (range) total tracheal intubation times for successful attempts with either grade of laryngoscopy were less than 60 s (19-109) and there were no clinically important differences. We conclude that the fibrescope used in conjunction with Macintosh laryngoscopy is a more reliable method of tracheal intubation than the single-use bougie in both types of grade III laryngoscopy. This finding has implications for the management of patients in whom grade III laryngoscopy is encountered unexpectedly after induction of anaesthesia, and also for the management of patients previously known to have grade III view at laryngoscopy.

We studied the success rates for tracheal intubation in 32 healthy, anaesthetised patients during simulated grade IIIa laryngoscopy, randomised to either the multiple-use or the single-use bougie. Success rates (primary end-point) and times taken (secondary end-point) to achieve tracheal intubation were recorded. The multiple-use bougie was more successful than the single-use one (15/16 successful intubations vs. 9/16; p = 0.03). With either device, median [range] total tracheal intubation times for successful attempts were < 54 [24-84] s and there were no clinically important differences between these times. We conclude that the multiple-use bougie is a more reliable aid to tracheal intubation than the single-use introducer in grade IIIa laryngoscopy.

We compared the times to intubate the trachea using three techniques in 60 healthy patients with normal airways: (i) fibreoptic intubation with a 6.0-mm reinforced tracheal tube through a standard laryngeal mask airway (laryngeal mask-fibreoptic group); (ii) fibreoptic intubation with a dedicated 7.0-mm silicone tracheal tube through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (intubating laryngeal mask-fibreoptic group); (iii) blind intubation with the dedicated 7.0-mm silicone tracheal tube through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (intubating laryngeal mask-blind group). Mean (SD) total intubation times were significantly shorter in the intubating laryngeal mask-blind group (49 (20) s) than in either of the other two groups (intubating laryngeal mask-fibreoptic 74 (21) s; laryngeal mask-fibreoptic group 75 (36) s; p < 0.001). However, intubation at the first attempt was less successful with the intubating laryngeal mask-blind technique (15/20 (75%)) than in the other two groups (intubating laryngeal mask-fibreoptic 19/20 (95%) and laryngeal mask-fibreoptic 16/20 (80%)) although these differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that in this patient group, all three techniques yield acceptable results. If there is a choice of techniques available, the intubating laryngeal mask-blind technique would result in the shortest intubation time.

We assessed whether flexible fibreoptic-guided orotracheal intubation could be rapidly and successfully achieved during a simulated rapid sequence induction in 30 anaesthetised and paralysed patients. Rapid sequence induction was simulated by applying practised cricoid pressure. Using a flexible fibreoptic laryngoscope with camera and closed circuit television, an anaesthetist experienced with the technique performed orotracheal endoscopy and intubation with a cuffed 7.0-mm Portex tracheal tube through a VBM Bronchoscope Airway. Fibreoptic intubation was successful at the first attempt in 28 patients (93%); two patients required two attempts. Mean (SD) time from removal of the facemask from the patient's face to the appearance of carbon dioxide in the expired breath after intubation was 111 (46) s (median 100 s; range 54-195 s). There were one or more difficulties in 13 patients (43%). These difficulties were largely avoidable and included problems with fibreoptic equipment, the Bronchoscope Airway, copious secretions, cricoid pressure or railroading of the tracheal tube. Flexible fibreoptic-guided orotracheal intubation may have a place in the management of failed intubation during a rapid sequence induction.

We conducted a postal survey of 221 anaesthetists in the Oxford region to determine their views and actual clinical practice regarding regional anaesthesia in adult patients undergoing limb surgery, when a combined regional and general anaesthetic was planned. Of the 162 respondents (73.3%), 142 (87.6%) regularly practised regional blocks for limb surgery in adult patients. For all the regional anaesthetic techniques in question, more anaesthetists felt it was safer to perform these blocks before induction of general anaesthesia than after induction. However, their actual practice varied markedly from their views, with more anaesthetists performing these blocks after general anaesthesia. Overall, trainees performed blocks before induction of general anaesthesia more often than consultants (p = 0.047).

The cuffed oropharyngeal airway is a modified Guedel airway and is recommended for anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing patients. To our knowledge this is the first report of transient unilateral lingual nerve palsy after the use of a cuffed oropharyngeal airway to maintain anaesthesia during arthroscopy of an ankle. The aetiology of lingual nerve damage is multifactorial. The possible mechanisms involved include anterior displacement of the mandible during insertion of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (as in the jaw thrust manoeuvre), compression of the nerve against the mandible, or stretching of the nerve over the hyoglossus by the cuff of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway. We recommend gentle airway manipulation with the use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway, avoidance of excessive cuff inflation and early recognition of such a complication if it occurs.

A survey of anaesthetists in the Oxford region was conducted to determine their skills and practice in performing awake fibreoptic intubation. Forty-two consultant obstetric anaesthetists (group O), 21 consultant anaesthetists with an interest in difficult airway management (group D) and 20 anaesthetic specialist registrars in their final training year (group S) were sent a questionnaire on management of a patient with a known difficult airway for elective caesarean section. All but one responded. If regional anaesthesia was unsuccessful or contraindicated, 75/82 respondents (91.5%) would choose to secure the airway by awake intubation. Of the remaining seven, six would use general anaesthesia and spontaneous respiration, five (6.1%) with the laryngeal mask airway and one (1.2%) with mask and airway and one (1.2%) local infiltration by the surgeon. Although awake fibreoptic intubation was the technique chosen by 98.7%, only six (8.1%) had experience of its performance in an obstetric patient. Of the 68 anaesthetists without such experience, only 12/31 (38.7%) group O compared to 13/18 (72.2%) group D and 12/19 (63.2%) group S would be confident to perform awake fibreoptic intubation in an obstetric patient. Only one anaesthetist in the survey practised awake fibreoptic intubation in non-obstetric patients regularly (>3/month). However, 69/82 respondents replied that all consultant obstetric anaesthetists should be experienced in performing awake fibreoptic intubation. We conclude that despite the value of awake fibreoptic intubation, consultant obstetric anaesthetists are less confident in performing it than those with an interest in difficult airway management and final year specialist registrars.

We have assessed the effect of cricoid pressure on insertion of and ventilation through the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) in 53 patients, in a double-blind, randomized study. Two anaesthetists assessed adequacy of ventilation in anaesthetized and paralysed patients at the same time but using different methods. The first assessed ventilation clinically, by observing synchronized chest expansion with gentle manual ventilation and the second noted measurements of tidal volume (VT) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP). Five mask ventilated breaths ('baseline') were assessed as above. Patients were then allocated randomly to receive cricoid pressure (group A, n = 28) or no cricoid pressure (group B, n = 25). Five further mask ventilated breaths ('after manoeuvre') were again assessed. A COPA was then inserted and five further breaths ('after COPA') were assessed. A COPA was inserted at the first attempt in all patients except for one in group A who required two attempts. COPA placement was difficult in one patient in group B who had a small distance between the incisor teeth. Ventilation was clinically 'adequate' in all patients except for one in the cricoid pressure group. There were no significant differences in measured VT or PIP between 'baseline' and 'after manoeuvre' breaths. Significant differences in VT and PIP were found after COPA insertion in the group that received cricoid pressure, with a mean decrease in VT of 108 ml (P = 0.0049) and a mean increase in PIP of 5.2 cm H2O (P = 0.0111).

The anaesthetic management of a 25-year-old parturient with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (Still's disease) and a difficult airway presenting for elective Caesarean section is described. Inadequate block after epidural anaesthesia necessitated general anaesthesia. This was safely accomplished by securing the airway with awake oral fibreoptic intubation before general anaesthesia was induced. The problems of performing an awake fibreoptic intubation in a pregnant patient are discussed and a simple method for performing the technique is described.

Difficulty in tracheal extubation was experienced in a patient following major maxillofacial surgery for reconstruction of the maxilla using bone grafts and a microvascular free flap. With the aid of an intubating flexible fibrescope, the cause of the difficulty was identified as a stitch accidentally transfixed through the tracheal tube. Tracheal re-intubation was required to facilitate surgical exploration to remove the stitch and the proximal end of the tube. The tip of an Olympus LF-2 intubating fibrescope was successfully negotiated in the trachea alongside the original tube with its cuff deflated. This allowed safe and speedy railroading of a new tube immediately after the distal end of the original tube was removed.

The effectiveness of postoperative pain relief and the frequency of side effects with three different doses of epidural diamorphine (2.0, 3.5 and 5 mg) was investigated. The study was carried out double-blind in 30 women undergoing awake elective caesarean section. Postoperative pain intensity was measured on a linear analogue scale. The time to onset of analgesia (TOA), time taken to reach a pain score of zero or become comfortable, and time to next analgesia (TNA) were not significantly different between groups. Three patients in the 2 mg group failed to achieve scores of zero but were comfortable. No nausea or vomiting was seen but the incidence of itching was 0, 30% and 80% in the 2.0, 3.5 and 5 mg groups respectively. We conclude that epidural diamorphine 2 mg is adequate for relief of post-caesarean pain and higher doses may increase the incidence of unwanted side-effects.

We report two patients with chronic non-malignant pain in whom morphine given intravenously via a patient-controlled analgesia system produced partial pain relief but was accompanied by severe side effects. Open administration of epidural morphine resulted in complete pain relief with minimal side effects and the patients were considered as candidates for implanted opioid delivery systems. However, when the epidural morphine was given in a double-blind and placebo-controlled manner, morphine did not produce greater analgesia than placebo and no dose-response relationship was seen. These cases show that careful investigation is necessary before proceeding to implanted systems and that changing the route did not improve the analgesia:side effect balance for morphine in these patients.

A 75-year-old woman with chronic low back pain was given bupivacaine and methylprednisolone epidurally through a catheter in the L1-L2 interspace. An unusual spread of bupivacaine resulted in a block from the C4 to the L1 dermatome with no relief of back pain. Injection of a radiopaque dye and subsequent X rays showed a similar spread. The possible causes are discussed.

Ninety patients who presented for elective gynaecological laparoscopy as day cases were allocated at random to three groups and studied on a double blind basis to compare the effects of nizatidine, ranitidine or placebo on gastric secretion. All the patients received the active drugs or placebo orally at least 45 minutes before the induction of anaesthesia. After tracheal intubation gastric fluid was aspirated via an orogastric tube and the volume and pH of the aspirate were measured. Venous blood samples were obtained at the times of gastric sampling to determine the plasma levels of the drugs. The proportion of patients with both pH greater than 2.5 and volume less than 25 ml were 100%, 90%, and 92.9% in the nizatidine, ranitidine and placebo groups respectively. There was no difference in volume between groups. Two patients in the nizatidine group without a measurable aspirate had blood levels less than the therapeutic range. The median pH values in both treated groups were significantly greater than in the placebo group, but there were no differences between the two treated groups. There were 19 (67.8%) patients in the placebo group with pH less than 2.5. This was significantly higher than the 2 (7.4%) and 6 (20%) in the nizatidine and ranitidine groups respectively. When the time interval between drug administration and induction of anaesthesia was divided arbitrarily into 45-90 minutes and greater than 90 minutes, all the patients in the nizatidine and ranitidine groups with pH less than 2.5 were given the drugs in the 45-90 minute interval; this suggests a latent period is required before the gastric pH increases. Nizatidine may be an effective protective agent against acid aspiration syndrome.