1. Apelin levels in patients with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome upon copeptin stimulation tests.
- Author
-
Bizzozero CA, Monnerat S, Chapman FA, Dhaun N, Refardt J, and Christ-Crain M
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Polydipsia diagnosis, Polydipsia blood, Arginine blood, Cross-Over Studies, Saline Solution, Hypertonic administration & dosage, Young Adult, Glycopeptides blood, Apelin blood, Polyuria diagnosis, Polyuria blood, Arginine Vasopressin blood
- Abstract
Objective: Differentiating between arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D) and primary polydipsia (PP) requires a copeptin stimulation test. We aimed to characterize changes in apelin, an endogenous hormone antagonizing AVP, upon copeptin stimulation tests., Design: Post hoc secondary analysis of a multi-centric cross-over diagnostic study (NCT03572166)., Setting: Outpatients included at the University Hospital Basel., Participants: Patients with AVP-D and PP., Interventions: Copeptin stimulation tests with hypertonic saline and arginine infusion., Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the absolute difference in apelin between baseline and peak of copeptin stimulation tests. Secondary objectives included the diagnostic ability of apelin., Results: Thirty-eight patients were analysed, 23 (60%) had PP and 15 (40%) had AVP-D. No difference was seen between baseline median (IQR) apelin levels in PP and AVP-D (1079 [912, 1225] and 910 [756, 1039] pmol/L, respectively). Upon hypertonic saline, apelin decreased by -241 (-326, -124) pmol/L in PP and -47.2 (-198, 5.86) pmol/L in AVP-D (P = .022). The area under the curve (AUC) to differentiate PP from AVP-D was 97.1% (95% CI, 90.5-100) for copeptin and 49.3% (95% CI, 30.4-68.1) for apelin (P < .001). Upon arginine, apelin decreased by -39.2 (-96.4, 39.8) pmol/L in PP and increased by 25.8 (2.8, 113.0) pmol/L in AVP-D (P = .1). The AUC was 97.1% (95% CI: 79.6-98.0) for copeptin and 60.5% (95% CI: 39.8-80.0) for apelin (P = .007)., Conclusions and Relevance: Our findings suggest that apelin decreases to a greater extent in PP compared with AVP-D upon copeptin stimulation tests. However, copeptin remains the best marker to differentiate AVP-D from PP., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Thermo Fisher Scientific provided the copeptin assays (BRAHMS Copeptin proAVP assay). The funders had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors declare that there is no further conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported. The co-author M.C.-C. is on the editorial board of EJE. She was not involved in the review or editorial process for this paper, on which she is listed as author., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Endocrinology.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF