Search

ObjectivesTo evaluate fidelity of delivery of a nurse-led non-pharmacological complex intervention for knee pain.SettingSecondary care. Single-centre study.Study designMixed methods study.ParticipantsEighteen adults with chronic knee pain.Inclusion criteriaAge >40 years, knee pain present for longer than 3 months, knee pain for most days of the previous month, at least moderate pain in two of the five domains of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain scale.InterventionsNurse-led non-pharmacological intervention comprising assessment, education, exercise, use of hot/cold treatments, footwear modification, walking aids and weight-loss advice (if required).Outcome(s)Primary: fidelity of delivery of intervention, secondary: nurses’ experience of delivering intervention.MethodsEach intervention session with every participant was video recorded and formed part of fidelity assessment. Fidelity checklists were completed by the research nurse after each session and by an independent researcher, after viewing the video-recordings blinded to nurse ratings. Fidelity scores (%), percentage agreement and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated. Two semi-structured interviews were conducted with the research nurse.ResultsFourteen participants completed all visits. 62 treatment sessions took place. Nurse self-report and assessor video rating scores for all 62 treatment sessions were included in fidelity assessment. Overall fidelity was higher on nurse self-report (97.7%) than on objective video-rating (84.2%). Percentage agreement between nurse self-report and video-rating was 73.3% (95% CI 71.3 to 75.3). Fidelity was lowest for advice on footwear and walking aids. The nurse reported difficulty advising on thermal treatments, footwear and walking aids, and did not feel confident negotiating achievable and realistic goals with participants.ConclusionsA trained research nurse can deliver most components of a non-pharmacological intervention for knee pain to a high degree of fidelity. Future research should assess intervention fidelity in a routine clinical setting, and examine its clinical and cost-effectiveness.Trial registration numberNCT03670706.

ObjectivesThe overall purpose of this research programme is to develop and test the feasibility of a complex intervention for knee pain delivered by a nurse, and comprising both non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions. In this first phase, we examined the acceptability of the non-pharmacological component of the intervention, issues faced in delivery, and resolve possible challenges.MethodsEighteen adults with chronic knee pain were recruited from the community. The intervention comprised holistic assessment, education, exercise, weight-loss advice (where appropriate) and advice on adjunctive treatments such as hot/cold treatments, footwear modification and walking aids. After nurse training, the intervention was delivered in four sessions spread over five weeks. Participants had one to one semi-structured interview at the end of the intervention. The nurse was interviewed after the last visit of the last participant. These were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Themes were identified by one author through framework analysis of the transcripts, and cross-checked by another.ResultsMost participants found the advice from the nurse easy to follow and were satisfied with the package, though some felt that too much information was provided too soon. The intervention changed their perception of managing knee pain, learning that it can be improved with self-management. However, participants thought that the most challenging part of the intervention was fitting the exercise regime into their daily routine. The nurse found discussion of goal setting to be challenging.ConclusionThe nurse-led package of care is acceptable within a research setting. The results are promising and will be applied in a feasibility randomised-controlled trial.

Background:The role of nurses in managing painful knee OA has been advocated but whether nurses can deliver such interventions as a package of care is unknown.The overall aim of this research is to develop and test a nurse-led complex intervention for knee pain comprising non-pharmacological and pharmacological components. In the first study phase, we report on fidelity and acceptability of a non-pharmacological intervention, to resolve possible challenges to delivery.Objectives:To evaluate fidelity of delivery and acceptability of non-pharmacological components of a complex intervention.Methods:This was a mixed-methods study. Participants with chronic knee pain were recruited from the community to receive the intervention, delivered in 4-sessions over a 5-week period by a trained research nurse. The intervention consisted of holistic assessment, patient education and advice, aerobic and strengthening exercise and weight-loss advice if required. All sessions were video-recorded. Fidelity checklists were completed by the nurse (nurse-rated) and two researchers from the video-recordings (video-rated). Median fidelity scores (%) and interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated for each component and each session. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants. These were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed following the framework approach.Results:18 participants (34% women), with a mean (SD) age and BMI of 68.7 (9.0) years and 31.2 (8.4) kg/m2, took part in the study. Of these, 14 completed all visits. In total, 62 intervention sessions were assessed for fidelity. Overall fidelity was rated high by both nurse-rated scores (97.7%) and video-rated scores (84.2%). The level of agreement between nurse-rated and video-recorded methods was 73.3% (CI 71.3, 75.3) and the inter-rater agreement was 65.5% (CI 60.3, 70.5). Fidelity of delivery was lower for advice on footwear modification and walking aids in all sessions and moderate for education in session 1 and for exercise in session 4 (Table 1).Table 1.Fidelity scores of the components of the intervention for each session,Intervention componentsSession 1*Session 2*Session 3*Session 4*Education78.1 (74.1, 93.7)87.5 (50, 100)87.5 (50, 100)100 (93.7, 100)Exercise94.4 (88.9, 100)88.9 (75, 94)86.1 (72, 100)75 (67.6, 82.8)Adjunctive treatments50 (45.83, 100)0 (0, 50)50 (0, 100)-*median (IQR)17 participants were interviewed. Most found advice supplied straightforward. They were satisfied with the package, which changed their perception of managing knee pain, understanding it can be improved though self-management. However, too much information was provided in a short time-span and it was difficult to fit exercises into their daily routine.Conclusion:Delivery of a non-pharmacological intevention by a nurse is feasible within a research setting. Most components of the intervention were delivered as intended, except for advice about the use of adjunctive treatment.Acknowledgments:This research was funded by the NIHR Nottingham BRC and Pain Centre Versus ArthritisDisclosure of Interests:Polykarpos Angelos Nomikos: None declared, Amy Fuller: None declared, Michelle Hall: None declared, Bonnie Millar: None declared, Reuben Ogollah: None declared, Michael Doherty: None declared, Roshan Nair Speakers bureau: Financial support from pharmaceutical companies (Biogen and Novartis) to present lectures at events related to psychological support for people with multiple sclerosis (Speaker’s bureau)., David Walsh Grant/research support from: 2016: Investigator-led grant from Pfizer Ltd (ICRP) on Pain Phenotypes in RA; non-personal financial disclosure (payment to University)., Consultant of: DAW has undertaken paid consultancy to Pfizer Ltd, Eli Lilly and Company and GSK Consumer Healthcare., Paid instructor for: 2019: Consultancy to Love Productions; consultancy on programme design, contribution to programme content on self-management of chronic pain (payments to University)2019: Consultancy to AbbVie Ltd; 13.06.19; presentation on RA pain at EULAR, Madrid, and webinar (payments to University).2019: Consultancy to Eli Lilly and Company Ltd. 06.06.19 Centre for Collaborative Neuroscience, Windlesham, Surrey, UK (payment to University).2019: Consultancy to Pfizer (payment to University).2018: Consultancy to Pfizer. 07.12.18. USA. 1 day. Tanezumab (payment to University).2018: Consultancy to Pfizer. 23.11.18. Manchester UK. 1 day. Tanezumab (payment to University).2018: Consultancy to Pfizer. 1.11.18. Skype. 4h. Tanezumab (payment to University).2018: Consultancy to GlaxoSmithKline Plc. 1 day. Pain in RA and anti-GM-CSF (payment to University).2018: Consultancy to Pfizer Ltd; Presentation at OARSI; non-personal financial disclosure (payment to University)2018: Consultancy to Pfizer Ltd; Patient preference study; non-personal financial disclosure (payment to University)2017: Consultancy to Pfizer Ltd; personal financial disclosure2017: Consultancy to Pfizer Ltd through Nottingham University; non-personal financial disclosure (payment to University).2015: Consultancy to GSK Consumer Healthcare; personal financial disclosure., Speakers bureau: 2019: Irish Society of Rheumatology: speaker fees (personal pecuniary), Ana Valdes Grant/research support from: Awarded a grant from Pfizer, Abhishek Abhishek: None declared