Search

Aims: The current work describes the development of mechanistic vaginal absorption and metabolism model within Simcyp Simulator to predict systemic concentrations following vaginal application of ring and gel formulations. Methods: Vaginal and cervix physiology parameters were incorporated in the model development. The study highlights the model assumptions including simulation results comparing systemic concentrations of 5 different compounds, namely, dapivirine, tenofovir, lidocaine, ethinylestradiol and etonogestrel, administered as vaginal ring or gel. Due to lack of data, the vaginal absorption parameters were calculated based on assumptions or optimized. The model uses release rate/in vitro release profiles with formulation characteristics to predict drug mass transfer across vaginal tissue into the systemic circulation. Results: For lidocaine and tenofovir vaginal gel, the predicted to observed AUC0‐t and Cmax ratios were well within 2‐fold error limits. The average fold error (AFE) and absolute AFE indicating bias and precision of predictions range from 0.62 to 1.61. For dapivirine, the pharmacokinetic parameters are under and overpredicted in some studies due to lack of formulation composition details and relevance of release rate used in ring model. The predicted to observed AUC0‐t and Cmax ratios were well within 2‐fold error limits for etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol vaginal ring (AFEs and absolute AFEs from 0.84 to 1.83). Conclusion: The current study provides first of its kind physiologically based pharmacokinetic framework integrating physiology, population and formulation data to carry out in silico mechanistic vaginal absorption studies, with the potential for virtual bioequivalence assessment in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the field of personalized dosing develops, the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry needs to offer flexibility in terms of tailoring the drug release and strength to the individual patient's needs. One of the promising tools which have such capacity is 3D printing technology. However, manufacturing small batches of drugs for each patient might lead to huge test burden, including the need to conduct bioequivalence trials of formulations to support the change of equipment or strength. In this paper we demonstrate how to use 3D printing in conjunction with virtual bioequivalence trials based on physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. For this purpose, we developed 3D printed ropinirole formulations and tested their bioequivalence with the reference product Polpix. The Simcyp simulator and previously developed ropinirole PBPK model were used for the clinical trial simulations. The Weibull-fitted dissolution profiles of test and reference formulations were used as inputs for the model. The virtual bioequivalence trials were run using parallel design. The study power of 80% was reached using 125 individuals. The study demonstrated how to use PBPK modeling in conjunction with 3D printing to test the virtual bioequivalence of newly developed formulations. This virtual experiment demonstrated the bioequivalence of one of the newly developed formulations with a reference product available on a market. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development of a generic drug product involves demonstrating that there is no significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient becomes available at the site of action, relative to the reference listed drug product. This remains challenging for many locally acting topical dermatological products because measuring the concentration of the active ingredient at the site of action in the skin may not be straightforward, and, in most instances, there are no established relationships between skin and plasma pharmacokinetic profiles. In recent years, the Office of Generic Drugs of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) established scientific research programs with the goal of enhancing patient access to high quality, affordable topical dermatological generics. A key strategy of these research programs was to leverage modeling and simulation methodologies that accelerate the development of these generics by facilitating alternative bioequivalence approaches for dermatological drug products. This report summarizes relevant insights and discussions from a 2021 FDA public workshop titled "Regulatory Utility of Mechanistic Modeling to Support Alternative Bioequivalence Approaches," which illustrated how mechanistic modeling and simulation approaches can be utilized (and have been used) to inform generic drug product development and regulatory decisions during the assessment of generic drug applications submitted to the FDA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]