Search

Aortic arch obstruction is often present with complex concomitant congenital heart defects (CHDs). The use of nonvalved femoral vein homograft (FVH) to reconstruct the aortic arch has distinct surgical advantages, including simplified reconstruction. We present an intraoperative video of a Yasui procedure utilizing FVH for aortic reconstruction in a 12-day-old (2.2 kg) neonate with right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, malalignment ventricular septal defect, aortic valve atresia, aortic arch hypoplasia, atrial septal defect, and ductal dependent systemic circulation. Further, we report outcomes for a series of three additional neonatal patients with complex CHD and aortic arch obstruction who underwent FVH arch reconstruction., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The application of robot-assisted thoracoscopy to cardiac surgery affords an opportunity to leverage the exceptional intraoperative exposure, visualization, and dexterity of the robotic platform. Here, we report the case of a 72-year-old woman who presented to our institution for evaluation of a left ventricular mass that was identified following workup for an embolic event. We present an intraoperative video that provides technical details of the robot-assisted resection of the lesion, which was found to be a left ventricular papillary fibroelastoma arising from the mitral chordal apparatus. This case highlights the advantages provided by the robotic platform, which permitted complete, minimally invasive surgical excision of the lesion while minimizing the burden of surgical trauma.

Background: Un-roofing is the most common technique utilized for repair of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA). There are very few publications directly comparing un-roofing to another surgical technique, like reimplantation., Methods: The prospectively collected Children's Memorial Hermann Heart Institute Society of Thoracic Surgeon's Database was retrospectively reviewed from 2007 to 2021. Surgical patients were included if they underwent un-roofing or reimplantation of the AAOCA. The primary outcomes of this study were operative characteristics and postoperative outcomes. Secondary outcomes included angiographic outcomes, aortic regurgitation incidence, ventricular function, and symptom relief., Results: From 2007 to 2021, there were 12 patients who underwent either a reimplantation (n = 9, 73%) or un-roofing (n = 3, 27%) for an AAOCA. The hospital length of stay was a median of 1.8 days longer for reimplantation compared to un-roofing. The last follow-up echocardiogram was a median of 52.2 days later in the reimplantation group. There was one patient (11%) in the reimplantation group that had more than or equal to mild aortic regurgitation and mild systolic ventricular dysfunction. Outpatient follow-up was incomplete and there was no postoperative computed tomographic angiography in the un-roofing cohort., Conclusions: Coronary artery reimplantation is a valuable alternative surgical technique to un-roofing for the repair of AAOCA. There are still some concerns with the creation of aortic regurgitation or incomplete symptom relief with any surgical technique. Longer-term follow-up and prospective studies will be needed to show an effective reduction of myocardial ischemia and risk of sudden cardiac death., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)