Search

This study aims to explore the measurement agreement between direct and indirect health utility measures in four chronic dermatological conditions (atopic dermatitis, hidradenitis suppurativa, pemphigus, psoriasis). Outpatients survey data collected between 2015 and 2021 were analysed. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcome measures included time trade-off (TTO), EQ-5D-5L and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Descriptive statistics were computed for the pooled sample and four diseases. Mean, standard deviation (SD), median, interquartile range (IQR), ceiling and floor effects were calculated for TTO, EQ-5D-5L and DLQI utilities. Bland‒Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were applied to investigate the agreement between health utility measures. Sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, educational level, employment status) and health-related information (disease duration, outpatient care visits in the past 3 months and disease severity) impact on utilities was investigated by Tobit regressions. The sample includes N = 765 patient responses with a mean age of 41.5 (SD = 16.2), majority being males (52.7%). Total sample mean utilities were the highest according to TTO (0.83), followed by EQ-5D-5L and vDLQI (0.81 and 0.81) and lowest in mDLQI (0.77). Measurement agreement was found only between TTO and EQ-5D-5L. Skin-disease severity impacted all health state utilities, though only TTO differentiated utility values according to disease type. The discrepancies between the TTO and DLQI warn to compare DLQI-based utilities in different dermatological conditions with extreme caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is the most commonly applied measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in psoriasis patients. It is among defining criteria of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and present in treatment guidelines. Our objective was to estimate preference-based HRQoL values (i.e., utilities) for hypothetical health states described by the 10 items of the DLQI in psoriasis patients. Moreover, we compare results to findings of a similar study previously conducted among the general public. A cross-sectional survey was carried out among 238 psoriasis patients. Seven hypothetical DLQI-defined health states with total scores of 6, 11, and 16 (3-3 and 1 states, respectively) were evaluated by time trade-off method. The difference in DLQI scores between hypothetical health states was set at 5 points, as it exceeds the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Utility scores were found to be homogenous across the seven hypothetical health states (range of means for the 6-point states 0.85-0.91, range of means for the 11-point states 0.83-0.85, and mean of 0.84 for the 16-point state). Overall, mean utilities assessed by psoriasis patients were higher for all seven states compared with the general public (mean difference 0.16-0.28; p < 0.001). In 11 out of the 15 comparisons between health states with DLQI scores differing larger than the MCID, there was no statistically significant difference in utility. Thus, in clinical settings, patients with DLQI scores differing more than the MCID may have identical HRQoL. Improving the definition of moderate-to-severe disease and reconsideration of the DLQI in clinical assessment of psoriasis patients are suggested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The health status and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with psoriasis in Hungary are understudied., Aim: To assess HRQoL in psoriasis patients, to compare HRQoL of psoriasis patients to that of the general public in Hungary and to identify predictors of HRQoL., Method: Between 2012 and 2016, two cross-sectional surveys were carried out among psoriasis patients at two academic dermatology departments. HRQoL was assessed by EQ-5D-3L, EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Predictors of HRQoL were analysed by multivariate linear regression., Results: 434 patients were enrolled (mean age 49 years, 65% male, 81% moderate-to-severe psoriasis, 43% treated with biologics). Mean EQ-5D-3L, EQ VAS and DLQI scores were 0.74 ± 0.28, 69.06 ± 20.98 and 6.78 ± 7.38, respectively. Overall, 54%, 43%, 40%, 32% and 15% of patients indicated at least some problems in pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, mobility, usual activities and self-care. EQ-5D-3L index scores in patients were lower compared to the age- and gender-matched general population in Hungary. The difference was statistically significant for the age groups 25-34 and 45-64 in males, and 18-64 in females (p<0.05). Female gender (p = 0.042), psoriatic arthritis (p<0.001) and palmoplantar psoriasis (p = 0.031) were associated with lower EQ-5D-3L index scores. On the contrary, employed and highly educated patients reported higher EQ-5D-3L index scores (p<0.001)., Conclusions: We were the first to assess HRQoL in psoriasis patients by using EQ-5D questionnaire in Hungary, and more broadly in Central and Eastern Europe. Our findings are useful for cost-effectiveness modelling of psoriasis treatments and decision-making in healthcare. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(21): 837-846.