1. Trends and Disparities in Robotic Surgery Utilization for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
- Author
-
Jindani R, Rodriguez-Quintero JH, Kamel M, Zhu R, Vimolratana M, Chudgar N, and Stiles B
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, United States epidemiology, Pneumonectomy statistics & numerical data, Pneumonectomy trends, Pneumonectomy methods, Social Determinants of Health statistics & numerical data, Health Services Accessibility statistics & numerical data, Health Services Accessibility trends, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung surgery, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology, Lung Neoplasms surgery, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Robotic Surgical Procedures statistics & numerical data, Robotic Surgical Procedures trends, Healthcare Disparities statistics & numerical data, Healthcare Disparities trends
- Abstract
Introduction: Robotic surgery has become an increasingly utilized approach for resectable lung cancer. However, availability may be limited for certain patient populations, underscoring inequity in access to innovative surgical techniques. We hypothesize that there is an association between social determinants of health and robotic surgery utilization for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database (2010-2019) for patients with clinical stage I-III NSCLC who underwent resection, stratifying the cohort based on surgical technique. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associations between sociodemographic and clinicopathologic factors and the robotic approach., Results: Among the 226,455 clinical stage I-III NSCLC patients identified, 34,059 (15%) received robotic resections, 78,039 (34.5%) underwent thoracoscopic resections, and 114,357 (50.5%) had open resections. Robotic surgery utilization increased from 3.1% in 2010 to 34% in 2019 (P < 0.001). Despite this, after adjusting by clinical stage, extent of resection, site of tumor, and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy, multivariable analysis revealed various sociodemographic and treatment facility factors that were associated with underutilization of this approach: lack of insurance (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.93), lower income brackets (aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91-0.96), provincial settings (urban aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.82; rural aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.51-0.64), and treatment at community centers (comprehensive community cancer programs aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.75; community cancer programs aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.47-0.55)., Conclusions: This study suggests that disparities in determinants of health influence accessibility to robotic surgery for resectable NSCLC. Identification of these gaps is crucial to target vulnerable sectors of the population in promoting equality and uniformity in surgical treatment., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF