Search

El regadío ha sido, sigue siendo y será uno de los pilares básicos para el desarrollo y mantenimiento de la población humana. Su evolución pasada ha ido al unísono del avance de los conocimientos en materias propias de agronomía e ingeniería del agua y de la tecnología (desarrollo de materiales plásticos, elementos electrónicos…) llegando a un estado actual en el que todavía están por resolver muchos interrogantes que quedan como retos para el futuro. Cabe destacar el fuerte impulso del regadío en Brasil en la última década. Aprovechando el relanzamiento de la revista Ingeniería del Agua se presenta una visión del regadío, dentro del espacio limitado de este artículo, que incluye algunas de las líneas de investigación actuales, algunas novedosas como la relacionada con el movimiento del agua en el sistema suelo-planta de las especies mediterráneas y sus consecuencias en el uso del agua, con el fin de motivar la publicación en Ingeniería del Agua de artículos relacionados con la variada temática que integra el estudio del Regadío en las comunidades de lengua española y portuguesa, Irrigation not only has been a key factor for the development and maintenance of human societies but it still plays this role now and it is foreseen that in the future as well. Its evolution has been constrained to the advance in knowledge on matters regarding Agronomy and Water Engineering and in technology however, many challenges deserve further research. It is worth to note that Brazil has strongly promoted irrigation in the last decade. Within the limited extension of this article, some current topics in irrigation, some of them are innovative such us the research line studying water flow in soil-plant in Mediterranean plants and its consequences on water use,. and future challenges are presented with the purpose of stimulate publication of Irrigation papers in the journal “Ingeniería del Agua” among Portuguese and Spanish language communities.

25 Pags.- 5 Tabls.- 5 Figs. The definitive version is available at: http://jast.modares.ac.ir/, High efficiency and uniformity of water and fertilizer application are usually, considered as the ultimate goals of an appropriate design and management of irrigation and fertigation systems. The objective followed in this paper was to present a simulation-optimization model for alternate vs. conventional furrow fertigation. Two simulation models (surface fertigation and SWMS-2D models) along with an optimization approach (genetic algorithm) were employed. Inflow discharge, irrigation cutoff and start times as well as duration of fertilizer injection were chosen as decision variables to be optimized for maximizing two objective (fitness) functions based on water and nitrate application efficiency plus uniformity. Experiments were conducted to collect field data (soil water content, soil nitrate concentration, discharge and nitrate concentration in runoff, as well as advance and recession times) in order to calibrate the simulation models. The simulation-optimization model indicated that variable and fixed alternate furrow fertigations benefited from higher water and nitrate efficiencies than the conventional furrow fertigation. However, minor differences were observed between these types of furrow irrigation regarding water and nitrate uniformity. This approach substantially improved water and nitrate application efficiency as well as uniformity, taking into account the field experimental conditions. Water and nitrate application efficiencies ranged from 72 to 88% and from 70 to 89%, respectively. Christiansen uniformity coefficients for water and nitrate varied between 80 and 90% and from 86 to 96%, respectively. A higher improvement was observed in conventional furrow fertigation than those in both alternate furrow fertigation treatments. The potential of the simulation-optimization model to improve design and management of furrow fertigation is highlighted.

Surface fertigation is a common choice when it comes to applying fertilizers in surface irrigated crops. The inherent complexity of the concepts and equations governing surface fertigation has made this technique a challenging research issue in the past decades. A number of researchers have used field experiments and/or modelling results to develop recommendations aiming at improving surface fertigation management. In this paper, these recommendations are reviewed and classified considering the particular type of surface irrigation system. Key factors affecting surface fertigation performance, such as the inflow hydrograph, soil and water quality, effective root depth for fertilizer uptake and the specific surface irrigation method are discussed. The history of surface fertigation modelling is reviewed, introducing key developments, accomplishments and open issues. Finally, current research gaps and needs are identified and discussed, such as the coupling of two-dimensional surface and subsurface simulation models or the use of performance optimization approaches. Research gaps require an intensification of modelling and/or experimental efforts.

Alternate furrow irrigation and surface fertigation have been known as techniques to control water and fertilizer losses. The main goal of this field study was to characterize the combined effect of these techniques on water and nitrate losses and on soil water and nitrate concentration. Two types of alternate furrow irrigation, i.e., variable alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) and fixed alternate furrow irrigation (FFI), as well as conventional furrow irrigation (CFI) were considered in the experiments. Results evidenced higher infiltration at irrigated furrows under AFI and FFI as compared to CFI. Increased lateral water movement under alternate irrigation resulted in lower water and nitrate losses via runoff and deep percolation. Water application efficiency for the CFI, FFI and AFI strategies amounted to 61.3%, 71.8% and 77.0% in the first fertigation and 36.4%, 58.8% and 60.7% in the second fertigation, respectively. Nitrate runoff for the CFI, FFI and AFI strategies amounted to 32.4%, 31.2% and 25.7% in the first fertigation and 44.3%, 35.1% and 32.7% in the second fertigation, respectively. Soil water content and nitrate concentration at the upstream part of the experimental field were larger than at the middle and downstream parts for all three irrigation regimes. Overall, alternate furrow fertigation, particularly AFI, stands as a simple and practical management practice for water and fertilizer conservation in agricultural fields., El riego por surcos alternos y el fertirriego por superficie se han venido utilizando por separado como técnicas con capacidad demostrada para controlar las pérdidas de agua y fertilizantes. El principal objetivo del ensayo descrito en este trabajo fue caracterizar el efecto del uso conjunto de estas técnicas en las pérdidas de agua y nitratos, en el agua en el suelo y en la concentración de nitrato en el suelo. En el ensayo se consideraron dos tipos de fertirriego por surcos alternos, variable (AFI) y fijo (FFI), así como el riego por surcos convencional (CFI). Los resultados evidenciaron una mayor infiltración en los surcos AFI y FFI que en los surcos CFI. El aumento del movimiento lateral del agua en el riego alterno resultó en menores pérdidas de agua y nitrato por escorrentía y percolación profunda. La eficiencia de aplicación del agua para las estrategias CFI, FFI y AFI fue de 61,3%, 71,8% y 77,0% en el primer fertirriego, y de 36,4%, 58,8% y 60,7% en el segundo fertirriego, respectivamente. Las escorrentías de nitrato en las estrategias CFI, FFI y AFI fueron de 32,4%, 31,2% y 25,7% en el primer fertirriego y de 44,3%, 35,1% y 32,7% en el segundo fertirriego, respectivamente. El contenido de agua en el suelo y la concentración de nitrato en el extremo aguas arriba del campo experimental resultó mayor que en la parte media o en el extremo aguas abajo en las tres estrategias ensayadas. El fertirriego por surcos alternos (AFI en particular) resulta una técnica de manejo simple y práctica para conservar agua y fertilizantes en la agricultura de regadío.