Search

Background Standard high-volume polyethylene glycol [PEG] bowel preparations [PEG-4L] are recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] undergoing colonoscopy. However, low-volume preparations [≤2 L of active volume] are often used in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the various bowel preparations for patients with IBD, including low-volume preparations. Methods We conducted a French prospective multicentre observational study over a period of 1 month. Patients aged 18–75 years with IBD with an indication of colonoscopy independent of the study were enrolled. The choice of the preparation was left to the investigators, as per their usual protocol. The patients' characteristics, disease, and colonoscopy characteristics were recorded, and they were given self-reported questionnaires. Results Twenty-five public and private hospitals enrolled 278 patients. Among them, 46 had a disease flare and 41 had bowel stenoses. Bowel preparations for colonoscopy were as follows: 42% received PEG-2L, 29% received sodium picosulfate [Pico], 15% received PEG-4L, and 14% had other preparations. The preparation did not reach the Boston's score efficacy outcome in the PEG-4L group in 51.2% of the patients [ p = 0.0011]. The preparation intake was complete for 59.5% in the PEG-4L group, compared with 82.9% in the PEG-2L group and 93.8% in the Pico group [ p < 0.0001]. Tolerability, as assessed by the patients' VAS, was significantly better for both Pico and PEG-2L compared with PEG-4L, and better for Pico compared with PEG-2L [ p = 0.008; p = 0.0003]. In multivariate analyses, low-volume preparations were independent factors of efficacy and tolerability. Adverse events occurred in 4.3% of the patients. Conclusions Preparations with PEG-2L and Pico were equally safe, with better efficacy and tolerability outcomes compared with PEG-4L preparations. The best efficacy/tolerance/safety profile was achieved with the Pico preparation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It is unknown which maintenance therapy is the most effective option for patients admitted for an acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) episode responding to intravenous steroids., Methods: We conducted a multicentre, parallel-group, open-label randomised controlled trial among 23 French centres in thiopurine and biologics-naïve adults admitted for ASUC responding to intravenous steroids. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive infliximab (IFX) and azathioprine (AZA) with a 7-day steroid tapering scheme (IFX+AZA arm) or AZA and conventional standardised steroid tapering regimen (AZA arm). The primary composite endpoint was treatment failure at week 52, defined as the absence of steroid-free clinical remission, the absence of endoscopic response, the use of a prohibited treatment for relapse, severe adverse event leading to treatment interruption, colectomy or death. Multiple imputation for missing data was performed., Findings: Among the 64 patients randomised (Lichtiger score 13.5±2.0; median age of 34.5 (P25-P75 26.3-50.3) years, median C reactive protein of 29.0 (12.8-96.8) mg/L at baseline): 32 were assigned to the IFX+AZA arm and 32 to the AZA arm. In the ITT population, treatment failure at week 52 was observed in 22/27 (81.5%) in the AZA arm and 16/30 (53.3%) in the IFX+AZA arm (risk ratio 3.85, 95% CI (1.15 to 12.88), p=0.03). 29 adverse events were severe, including 13 disease exacerbations, 6 severe infections without any difference between both arms., Interpretation: Combination therapy with IFX+AZA was more effective at 1 year than AZA alone to avoid treatment failure in patients with ASUC responding to intravenous steroids., Trial Registration Number: NCT02425852., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AA received consulting fees from Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, Tillotts Pharma, Janssen and Sandoz as well as lecture fees and travel accommodations from Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Biogen, Fresenius Kabi, Amgen and Celltrion. PS reports consulting fees from Pfizer, Astellas, Janssen, Fresenius Kabi, Takeda, Abbvie, Merck-MSD, Pilège, Lilly, Celltrion and Biocodex; and grants from Biocodex and Janssen. CS declare lecture and/or consulting fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Celltrion, Janssen, Lilly, Takeda, Tillots. PW received board membership, consultancy, or lecture fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Celltrion, Ferring, Janssen, and Takeda. LV received fees from Abbvie, Amgen, MSD, Ferring, Takeda, Pfizer, Celltrion, Janssen, Galapagos, Dr Falk. RA declares lecture fees from MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, and Janssen. GB received lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Takeda and Pfizer and consultant fees from Takeda, Janssen, Lilly, Celltrion, Sandoz, Abbvie. MB has received lecture fees and travel accommodation from Abbvie, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Pfizer and Takeda. DL has received counseling, boards, transports and/or fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Ferring, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche, Takeda, Tillots. MA has served as a speaker, consultant, and/or advisory board member for Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech, IQVIA, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Tillotts. FG declares counseling, boards, transports and lectures fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Celltrion, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda. NR has received lecture fees from AbbVie and Takeda. LP-B received consulting fees from Merck, Abbvie, Janssen, Genentech, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Shire, Therakos, Pharmacosmos, Pilège, BMS, UCB-Pharma, Hospira, Celltrion, Takeda, Biogaran, Boerhinger-Ingelheim, Lilly, Pfizer and HAC-Pharma. This author also received lecture fees from Merck, Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen Cilag, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Therakos, HAC-Pharma and Mitsubishi. No conflicts of interest are claimed by the remaining authors., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.)

BACKGROUND Hepatic lesion in a young woman can lead to multiple diagnostic hypotheses, mainly infection and tumor. Crohn's disease (CD) is hardly evoked by clinicians but is reportedly associated with liver damage, especially diffuse granulomas and aseptic abscess. IgA deficiency has been associated with celiac disease or inflammatory bowel disease, including CD. In this report, we present the diagnosis of CD in a fit 23-year-old woman following detection of aseptic liver abscess associated with a previously unknown selective IgA deficiency. CASE REPORT A young 23-year-old woman with no previous medical history other than appendicitis 1 year ago was hospitalized with persistent fever for 2 weeks associated with C-reactive protein increase (142 mg/L). Abdominal computed tomodensitometry and MRI showed a 4-cm liver abscess (segment IV). Biopsy revealed an aseptic epithelioid gigantocellular granuloma with caseous-free necrosis and granulomas rich in eosinophilic polynuclei. Furthermore, colonoscopy detected an inflammation in the colonic and ileal mucosa, with focal ulcerations, suggestive of CD. Immunological assessment led to the diagnosis of selective IgA deficiency. Anti-TNF and immunosuppressor therapies led to a rapid recovery and regression of hepatic lesions. CONCLUSIONS CD should be considered in aseptic liver abscess cases. Considering the association between IgA deficiency and CD, IgA (and IgG/IgM) should be assessed in patients with CD. Further research is necessary to confirm if specific manifestations such as aseptic liver abscess frequently occur in patients with CD related to IgA deficiency.

Background: Fatigue is commonly reported by patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], but the determinants of IBD-related fatigue have yet to be determined., Aims: To identify the factors associated with fatigue in a large population of patients with IBD., Patients and Methods: Fatigue and nine other IBD-related disability dimensions were assessed in a cohort of 1704 consecutive patients with IBD using the IBD-disk questionnaire in a cross-sectional survey of 42 French and Belgian centres. Fatigue and severe fatigue were defined as energy subscores >5 and >7, respectively. Determinants of fatigue were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratios [ORs] are provided with 95% confidence intervals)., Results: The prevalence rates of fatigue and severe fatigue were 54.1% and 37.1%, respectively. Both fatigue and severe fatigue were significantly higher in patients with active disease than in patients with inactive disease [64.9% vs 44.7% and 47.4% vs 28.6%, respectively; p < 0.001 for both comparisons]. In the multivariate analysis stratified by age, sex, type of IBD and IBD activity, fatigue was associated with age >40 years (OR = 0.71 [0.54-0.93]), female sex (OR = 1.48 [1.13-1.93]) and IBD-related sick leave (OR = 1.61 [1.19-2.16]), and joint pain (OR = 1.60 [1.17-2.18]), abdominal pain (OR = 1.78 [1.29-2.45]), regulating defecation (OR = 1.67 [1.20-2.32]), education and work (OR = 1.96 [1.40-2.75]), body image (OR = 1.38 [1.02-1.86]), sleep (OR = 3.60 [2.66-4.88]) and emotions (OR = 3.60 [2.66-4.88]) subscores >5., Conclusion: Determinants of fatigue are not restricted to IBD-related factors but also include social factors, sleep and emotional disturbances, thus supporting a holistic approach to IBD patient care., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Owing to growing number of therapeutic options with similar efficacy and safety, we compared the acceptability of therapeutic maintenance regimens in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Methods: From a nationwide study (24 public or private centers), IBD patients were consecutively included for 6 weeks. A dedicated questionnaire including acceptability numerical scales (ANS) ranging from 0 to 10 (highest acceptability) was administered to both patients and related physicians., Results: Among 1850 included patients (65.9% with Crohn's disease), the ANS were 8.68 ± 2.52 for oral route (first choice in 65.8%), 7.67 ± 2.94 for subcutaneous injections (first choice in 21.4%), and 6.79 ± 3.31 for intravenous infusions (first choice in 12.8%; P < .001 for each comparison). In biologic-naïve patients (n = 315), the most accepted maintenance regimens were oral intake once (ANS = 8.8 ± 2.2) or twice (ANS = 6.9 ± 3.4) daily and subcutaneous injections every 12 or 8 weeks (ANS = 7.9 ± 3.0 and ANS = 7.2 ± 3.2, respectively). Among 342 patients with prior exposure to subcutaneous biologics, the preferred regimens were subcutaneous injections (≥2 week-intervals; ANS between 9.1 ± 2.3 and 8.1 ± 2.7) and oral intake once daily (ANS = 7.7 ± 3.2); although it was subcutaneous injections every 12 or 8 weeks (ANS = 8.4 ± 3.0 and ANS = 8.1 ± 3.0, respectively) and oral intake once daily (ANS = 7.6 ± 3.1) in case of prior exposure to intravenous biologics (n = 1181). The impact of usual therapeutic escalation or de-escalation was mild (effect size <0.5). From patients' acceptability perspective, superiority and noninferiority cutoff values should be 15% and 5%, respectively., Conclusions: Although oral intake is overall preferred, acceptability is highly impacted by the rhythm of administration and prior medication exposures. However, SC treatment with long intervals between 2 injections (≥8 weeks) and oral intake once daily seems to be the most accepted modalities., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Budesonide remains the backbone therapy for microscopic colitis [MC]; however, relapses are frequent, and some patients are intolerant or dependent. Anti-TNF therapy is increasingly used to treat these patients, but available evidence is still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anti-TNF therapy in MC patients failing budesonide., Methods: In a multicentre retrospective cohort study, budesonide-refractory, -dependent, or -intolerant MC patients treated with anti-TNF agents were included. Clinical remission was defined as fewer than three bowel movements per day, and clinical response was defined as an improvement in stool frequency of at least 50%., Results: Fourteen patients were included. Median age was 58.5 years, median disease duration was 25 months, and median follow-up was 29.5 months. Seven patients were treated with infliximab [IFX], and seven with adalimumab. Clinical remission without steroids at 12 weeks was reached in 5/14 [35.7%] patients; all of these received IFX. Clinical response at 12 and 52 weeks, was obtained in 9/14 [64.3%] and 7/14 [50%] patients, respectively. Five patients switched to another anti-TNF agent. When considering both first- and second-line anti-TNF therapies, 7 [50%] patients were in clinical remission at Week 52. Mild to moderate adverse events were reported in six ptients. Two patients were treated with vedolizumab, of whom one had clinical response; one patient treated with ustekinumab had no response., Conclusions: This is the first multicentre cohort study showing that half of patients treated with anti-TNF therapy for MC achieved clinical remission in case of budesonide failure., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The exact rate of contraindications to anti-TNF therapy and physician perspectives on treatment choices facing to anti-TNF contraindication, are poorly reported., Methods: A two-week cross-sectional study was conducted in 31 centres. Physicians completed a questionnaire for a total of 1,314 consecutive outpatients with Crohn's disease, assessing each patient's potential contraindications to anti-TNF therapy, the choice of alternative therapy to anti-TNFs, and their preference in an unrestricted reimbursement setting., Results: Among the 1,293 responses to the first item, 148 (11.5%) reported 32 absolute contraindications (2.5%) and 116 relative contraindications (9.0%) to anti-TNF therapy. When asked about their preference of alternative therapies in those cases with contraindications to anti-TNF, physicians chose ustekinumab and vedolizumab, 75.6% and 23.9%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the choice of vedolizumab was the preferred choice for patients aged > 60 years with the L2 phenotype and the absence of perianal lesions. In a hypothetical setting of unrestricted reimbursement, anti-TNFs remained physicians' preferred first-line biological therapy choice for 78.2%., Conclusion: Anti-TNF contraindications occurred in up to 11.5% of patients with Crohn's disease. Physicians' choices for alternative therapy to anti-TNF relied on ustekinumab in 75.6% and vedolizumab in 23.9% of these cases. This choice was driven mainly by phenotypical criteria and age., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Maria Nachury has received lecture and consulting fees from Abbvie, Adacyte, Amgen, Arena, Biogen, CTMA, Ferring, Gilead, Janssen, Mayoli Spindler, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda Melanie Serrero has received lecture or consulting fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Amgen, Celltrion, Janssen, Ferring, Takeda and Tillotts. Philippe Seksik received consulting fees from Takeda, Abbvie, Merck-MSD, Biocodex, Janssen, Amgen, Astellas and Pfizer, grants from Biocodex and travel accommodation from Merck-MSD, Takeda and Amgen. Charlotte Gagniere received transport fees from Takeda Arnaud Bourreille received counselling, boards or transport fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Ferring, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and Tillotts Pharma. Stéphane Nahon reported a relationship with Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, MSD, Gilead, Ferring Marion Simon reported a relationship with Abbvie, Mylan, Takeda and Amgen Lucas Guillo has received lecture and consulting fees from Abbvie Xavier Roblin reported a relationship with MSD, Pfizer, Celltrion, Abbvie, Amgen, Takeda, Janssen, Ferring, Theradiag. Anthony Buisson has received research funding from Pfizer, lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Hospira, MSD, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda and Vifor Pharma and consulting fees from Abbvie, Biogen, Janssen, Pfizer and Takeda. Stephane Nancey has received consulting fees from Merck, Abbvie, Takeda, Ferring, Norgine, Vifor Pharma, Novartis, Janssen Cilag, Hospira, Takeda and HAC Pharma Vered Abitbol has received lecture fees from Amgen, Biogen, Mylan, Sandoz, Pfizer, Takeda, Janssen, Tillots, Gilead, Ferring Jean-Marie Reimund has received consulting fees from Hospira and Pfizer. This author has also received lectures fees from Abbvie, Biocodex, Ferring, Janssen Cilag, Pfizer and Takeda, as well as travel accommodations from Ferring, Abbvie, MSD, Janssen Cilag, Pfizer, Hospira and Takeda Lucine Vuitton has received lecture fees from Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Ferring, Janssen, Amgen, Gilead, Celltrion and Pfizer, and research grants from MSD, Takeda and Pfizer. Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet has received consulting fees from Merck, Abbvie, Janssen, Genentech, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Shire, Therakos, Pharmacosmos, Pilège, BMS, UCB-Pharma, Hospira, Celltrion, Takeda, Biogaran, Boerhinger-Ingelheim, Lilly, Pfizer, and HAC-Pharma. This author has also received lecture fees from Merck, Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen Cilag, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Therakos, HAC-Pharma, and Mitsubishi. Cyrielle Gilletta received lecture fees from Abbvie, Takeda, Pfizer and Janssen and consulting fees from Abbvie, Janssen and Takeda. Matthieu Allez has received honoraria from Novo Nordisk, MSD, Abbvie, Ferring, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, GSK, Hospira, UCB, Novartis, Takeda, Mayolo-Spindler. Stephanie Viennot has received consulting fees from Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Vifor Pharma and Ferring. Claire Painchart has received travel accommodation from Abbvie, Janssen, Biogene, Fresenius Kabi, Takeda and Pfizer. Mathurin Fumery has received lecture and consulting fees from Abbvie, MSD, Boehringer, Pfizer, Takeda, Janssen and Ferring. David Laharie has received counseling, boards, transports and/or fees from Abbvie, Biogaran, Biogen, Ferring, HAC-pharma, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche, Takeda, Theradiag, Tillots. Aurelien Amiot has received consulting fees from Abbvie, Hospira, Takeda, Gilead and Biocodex as well as lecture fees and travel accommodations from Abbvie, Janssen, Biocodex, Hospira, Ferring, Takeda and MSD. This author has also received advisory board fees from Gilead, Takeda and Abbvie. No conflicts of interest are claimed by the remaining authors., (Copyright © 2022 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To describe new-onset IBD (new IBD) in patients treated with IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), to assess their incidence and to identify their risk factors in real life., Methods: A French national registry (MISSIL) aimed to report all cases of new IBD in patients treated with IL-17i from January 2016 to December 2019. Using the estimated number of patients treated by IL-17 in France during the study period, the annual incidence rates of new IBD was reported in IL-17i-treated patients. A case-control study was performed with two controls per new IBD case matched by gender, age and underlying inflammatory disease., Results: Thirty-one cases of new IBD under IL-17i were collected: 27 patients treated for spondyloarthritis and four patients for psoriasis. All were observed with secukinumab (SEK). The median time to onset of new IBD symptoms was 4.0 (1.5-7.5) months. SEK was discontinued in all patients. The evolution was favourable with complete resolution (17/31), improvement (7/31) or stabilization (5/31). Two patients died: one due to a massive myocardial infarction and one due to post-colectomy complications. The incidence of new IBD decreased from 0.69/100 patient-years [PY] (7/1010) in 2016 to 0.08/100 PY (6/7951) in 2019. No previous treatment with etanercept (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.80, P = 0.014) and low number of previous biologic therapies (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.94, P = 0.021) were significantly associated with new IBD., Conclusion: The incidence of new IBD was low and decreased from 2016 to 2019. The outcome was favourable in 24 out of 31 patients, but two patients died., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Aim: The inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]-disk is a 10-item self-questionnaire that is used to assess IBD-related disability. The aim of the present study was to evaluate this tool in the assessment of IBD daily-life burden., Methods: A 1-week cross-sectional study was conducted in 42 centres affiliated in France and Belgium. Patients were asked to complete the IBD-disk [best score: 0, worst score: 100] and a visual analogue scale [VAS] of IBD daily-life burden [best score: 0, worst score: 10]. Analyses included internal consistency, correlation analysis, and diagnostic performance assessment., Results: Among the 2011 IBD outpatients who responded to the survey [67.8% of the patients had Crohn's disease], 49.9% were in clinical remission. The IBD-disk completion rate was 73.8%. The final analysis was conducted in this population [n = 1455 patients]. The mean IBD-disk score and IBD daily-life burden VAS were 39.0 ± 23.2 and 5.2 ± 2.9, respectively. The IBD-disk score was well correlated with the IBD daily-life burden VAS [r = 0.67; p <0.001]. At an optimal IBD-disk cut-off of 40, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] for high IBD daily-life burden [VAS >5] was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.83; p <0.001)., Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients, the IBD-disk score was well correlated with IBD daily-life burden, and it could be used in clinical practice., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: There are few data concerning patients with Crohn's disease (CD) complicated by a stricture of the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGT)., Aims: We evaluated the outcome and management of CD patients complicated by a stricture of the UGT., Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter study including all CD patients with a non-passable symptomatic UGT stricture on endoscopy. Primary outcome measure was surgery-free survival from diagnosis of stricture. Efficacy of medical, endoscopic, and surgical treatments, and identification of predictors of surgery were also evaluated., Results: 60 CD patients with an UGT stricture were included. 60% of the strictures were located in the duodenum. With a median follow-up of 5.5 (IQR: 3.0-12.0) years since stricture diagnosis, surgical-free survival was 75% and 64% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. At the end of the follow up, 27 (45%) patients underwent surgery. 77 endoscopic procedures were performed in 30 patients with an immediate success of 81% and a clinical benefit in 84% of the procedures. In multivariate analysis, anti-TNF treatment initiation was associated with a reduced risk of surgery., Conclusion: CD UGT strictures are mainly located in the duodenum. Medical and endoscopic treatments allow to avoid surgery in half of the patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest T. Lambin: Travel accommodation: Adacyte therapeutics. A. Amiot: Consulting fees from Abbvie, Hospira, Janssen, Tillotts, Pfizer, Takeda, Gilead and Biocodex. Lecture fees and travel accommodation from Abbvie, Janssen, Biocodex, Hospira, Ferring, Pfizer, Ferring, Tillotts, Takeda and MSD. Advisory board fees from Gilead, Takeda and Abbvie. C. Stefanescu: Consulting: Takeda. Lecture fees: Abbvie, Fresenius Kabi, Pfizer, Janssen. Travel acomodation: MSD, Takeda, Abbvie, Pfizer, Janssen. P. Seksik: Consulting fees : Takeda, Abbvie, Merck-MSD, Biocodex, Janssen, Amgen, Astellas, Pfizer Grants : Biocodex. Sponsored travel : Merck-MSD and Takeda, Amgen. D. Laharie: Counseling, boards, transports or personal fees from Abbvie, Biogaran, Biogen, Ferring, HAC-pharma, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche, Takeda, Theradiag, Tillots. A. Bourreille: Personal fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Ferring, Tillots, Celltrion, Takeda, Pfizer, MSD, Roche, Fresenius Kabi OSE Immunotherapeutics, Medtonic. Grants: Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, MaunaKea Technology, Medtronic. G.Cadiot: Consulting fees: Ipsen, Novartis, AAA, Pfizer, Keocyt. Lecture fees: Takeda. N. Dib: Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda. M. Fumery: Consulting fees : AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Celgene, Gilead. Lecture Fees : Boehringer and Biogen Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Janssen, Ferring, Tillots. C. Gilletta de St Joseph: Lecture fees: Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer. Consulting fees: Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, Celltrion. J. Filippi: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Celltrion, Ferring, HAC Pharma, Hospira, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, Vifor. S. Viennot: Abbvie, Amgen, Celltrion, Ferring, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda. L. Plastaras: Personnal fees or boards from AbbVie, Janssen, Tillots, Takeda, Pfizer, MSD. M. Serrero: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Celltrion, Gilead, Janssen, Ferring, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, Tillots. S. Nahon: Lecturer or advisory board fees from AbbVie, MSD, Vifor Pharma, Pfizer, Janssen and Ferring. G. Pineton de Chambrun: Lecture fees from Pfizer, MSD, AbbVie, Takeda and Ferring. Consulting fees from Takeda, Tillots Pharma and Janssen. JF. Rahier: Lecture fees from AbbVie, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, Ferring, and Falk, consulting fees from AbbVie, Takeda, Hospira, Mundipharma, MSD, Pfizer, GlaxoSK, Janssen and Amgen, and research support from Takeda and AbbVie. X. Roblin: Consultant fees from MSD,Pfizer, Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Takeda, janssen, crlltrion, Ferring. M. Boualit: Travel accommodation : abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda. G. Bouguen: Lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, MSD, Takeda and Pfizer and consultant fees from Takeda, Janssen. L. Peyrin-Biroulet: Personal fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Genentech, Ferring, Tillots, Pharmacosmos, Celltrion, Takeda, Boerhinger Ingelheim, Pfizer, Index Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Celgene, Biogen, Samsung Bioepis, Alma, Sterna, Nestle, Enterome, Allergan, MSD, Roche, Arena, Gilead, Hikma, Amgen, BMS, Vifor, Norgine ; Mylan, Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Oppilan Pharma, Sublimity Therapeutics, Applied Molecular Transport, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Enthera, Theravance. Grants: Abbvie, MSD, Takeda. B. Pariente: Consulting fees: AbbVie, MSD, Takeda, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, and Biogaran. Lecture fees: Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Janssen, and Ferring, and other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: New therapeutic options for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) with perianal lesions failing anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents are needed. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of ustekinumab in perianal CD (pCD) and predictors of clinical success in a real-life multicenter cohort., Methods: We conducted a national multicenter retrospective cohort study in patients with either active or inactive pCD who received ustekinumab. In patients with active pCD at treatment initiation, the success of ustekinumab was defined by clinical success at 6 months assessed by the physician's judgment without additional medical or surgical treatment for pCD. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of success. In patients with inactive pCD at ustekinumab initiation, the pCD recurrence-free survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Two hundred seven patients were included, the mean age was 37.7 years, the mean duration of CD was 14.3 years, and the mean number of prior perianal surgeries was 2.8. Two hundred five (99%) patients had previously been exposed to at least 1 anti-TNF and 58 (28%) to vedolizumab. The median follow-up time was 48 weeks; 56/207 (27%) patients discontinued therapy after a median time of 43 weeks. In patients with active pCD, success was reached in 57/148 (38.5%) patients. Among patients with setons at initiation, 29/88 (33%) had a successful removal. The absence of optimization was associated with treatment success (P = 0.044, odds ratio 2.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.96-7.82). In multivariable analysis, the number of prior anti-TNF agents (≥3) was borderline significant (P = 0.056, odds ratio 0.4; 95% confidence interval: 0.15-1.08). In patients with inactive pCD at initiation, the probability of recurrence-free survival was 86.2% and 75.1% at weeks 26 and 52, respectively., Discussion: Ustekinumab appears as a potential effective therapeutic option in perianal refractory CD. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Background & Aims: The increasing incidence of anal canal carcinomas requires better knowledge on anal human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. We aimed to assess anal canal HPV infection prevalence and risk factors among patients seen at a gastroenterology department in France., Methods: We analyzed anal tissue samples collected from 469 consecutive patients (median age 54 years, 52% women), including 112 who received immunosuppressant therapies and 101 with inflammatory bowel disease (70 with Crohn's disease), who underwent colonoscopy examinations from April 1, 2012 to April 30, 2015. HPV was detected and genotyped using the INNO-LiPA assay, and we collected medical and demographic data from all subjects. Risk factors for any HPV, high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) and HPV16 infection were assessed by bivariate and multivariate analysis. The primary outcomes association of HR-HPV or HPV16 with medical and demographic features., Results: We detected HPV DNA in anal tissues from 34% of the subjects and HR-HPV in 18%. HPV16 was the most prevalent genotype (detected in 7%), followed by HPV51, HPV52, and HPV39. HR-HPV was detected in a significantly higher proportion of samples from women (23.1%) than men (12.8%) (P = .0035); HR-HPV and HPV16 were detected in a significantly higher proportion of patients with Crohn's disease (30.0%) than without (18.1%) (P = .005). Female sex, history of sexually transmitted disease, lifetime and past year-number of sexual partners, active smoking, and immunosuppressive therapies were independent risk factors for anal HR-HPV infection in multivariate analysis., Conclusion: One third of patients who underwent colonoscopy at a gastroenterology department were found to have anal canal HPV infection. We detected HR-HPV infection in almost 20% of patients and in a significantly higher proportion of patients with Crohn's disease than without. Increasing our knowledge of HPV infection of anal tissues could help physicians identify populations at risk and promote prophylaxis with vaccination and adequate screening., (Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Genital fistulas represent a devastating complication of Crohn's disease. Only studies with small sample sizes have evaluated the efficacy of anti-TNF therapy for this complication., Aims: To assess the efficacy of anti-TNF therapy for genital fistulas complicating Crohn's disease and to identify predictive factors associated with clinical response at 1 year., Methods: Consecutive patients treated with anti-TNF therapy for genital fistulas complicating Crohn's disease from 1999 to 2016 in 19 French centres from the Groupe d'Etude Thérapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du tube Digestif were included in a retrospective cohort study. Outcome was clinical fistula closure at 1 year., Results: Among the 204 women with genital fistulas who received anti-TNF therapy, 131 were analysed. The first anti-TNF given was infliximab (79%), adalimumab (20%), or certolizumab (1%). At start of anti-TNF therapy, 56% of patients had seton drainage and 53% had concomitant immunosuppressive treatment. A complementary surgery was performed during the first year in 10 patients (8%). At 1 year, 37% of patients had complete clinical fistula closure, 22% had a partial response, and 41% had no response. Among patients without complementary surgery, 34% (41/121) had complete clinical fistula closure. Only complementary surgery was associated with better response on multivariate analysis (adjusted relative risk: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.25-3.26, P = 0.0043)., Conclusions: In the anti-TNF era, approximately one-third of patients with genital fistula in Crohn's disease had complete fistula closure at 1 year. Collaboration between surgeons and gastroenterologists appears to be very important to improve the rate of fistula closure., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)