Search

Amiodarone and mexiletine are used for ventricular arrhythmias, for which a combination therapy of both anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) is not uncommon. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can be beneficial for clinical guidance of therapy, especially to correctly identify adverse events. Desethylamiodarone, the active metabolite of amiodarone, accumulates over time and is associated with serious adverse events. Therefore, simultaneous TDM for amiodarone, desethylamiodarone and mexiletine is advantageous in clinical practice. The presented LC-MS/MS method was validated for selectivity, matrix effect, linearity, accuracy, precision, carry-over and stability. The method was continuously evaluated during eight months of clinical use. The method was shown to be linear within the measured range of 0.1 to 10 mg/L for each component. The matrix effect was considered negligible. No interfering responses were found for amiodarone, desethylamiodarone and the isotopic-labeled internal standards. A constant and reproducible within-run contribution of 45.3 %, originating from the system, was identified for mexiletine. The systemic contribution to the peak area of the lowest quantifiable concentration of mexiletine affected the selectivity and carry-over effect measurements. Multiple measurements showed that regression adjusted concentrations were accurate and reproducible, indicating calibration correction was applicable. Sample stability was found to be within limits for all storage conditions and freeze-thaw cycles. Furthermore, long-term method evaluation with external controls resulted in stable measurements with a percentage coefficient of variance between 1.3 % and 6.3 %. The presented practical and reliable method is applicable for clinical TDM and will allow clinical practitioners to guide drug therapy of amiodarone and mexiletine., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: C.E.M. Hollak reports financial support was provided by Nationale Postcode Loterij. P.G. Postema reports a relationship with Dutch Heart Foundation that includes: funding grants. P.G. Postema is a member of the Scientific Advisory Group on Cardiovascular Issues (SAG-CVS) of the EMA since 2021 If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Prednisolone is the cornerstone of treatment for idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children, but is associated with marked side-effects. Therapeutic drug monitoring using saliva would be a patient-friendly option to monitor prednisolone treatment. To assess the feasibility of saliva monitoring, we described the pharmacokinetics (PK) of unbound prednisolone in plasma and saliva of children with first onset steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS)., Methods: Children (age 2-16 years) with SSNS participating in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with levamisole were treated with an 18-week tapering schedule of prednisolone. Five serial samples were collected at 4 (saliva) and 8 weeks (saliva and plasma) after first onset. A nonlinear mixed-effects model was used to estimate the PK parameters of unbound prednisolone and the saliva-to-plasma ratio. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess the predictive performance of saliva monitoring., Results: From 39 children, 109 plasma and 275 saliva samples were available. Estimates (relative squared error) of unbound plasma clearance and volume of distribution were 93 (5%) L h -1 70 kg -1 and 158 (7%) L 70 kg -1 , respectively. Typical saliva-to-plasma ratio was 1.30 (8%). Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that on basis of 4 saliva samples and a single plasma sample unbound plasma area-under-the-concentration-time curve can be predicted within 20% imprecision in 79% of the patients compared to 87% based on 4 plasma samples., Conclusion: Saliva proved to be a reliable and patient-friendly option to determine prednisolone plasma exposure in children with SSNS. This opens opportunities for further PK and pharmacodynamics studies of prednisolone in a variety of paediatric conditions., (© 2024 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Although unbound ciprofloxacin is responsible for antibacterial effects, assays measuring the unbound drug plasma concentrations are scarce. This study aimed to develop and validate a rapid, reproducible, and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for the determination of total and unbound ciprofloxacin plasma concentrations., Methods: The determination of total ciprofloxacin concentrations required a 10 μL sample, while for unbound ciprofloxacin concentrations, it was 100 μL. Unbound ciprofloxacin was separated from protein-bound ciprofloxacin through ultrafiltration. A deuterated internal standard was used, and the sample preparation involved protein precipitation. The method was fully validated over a concentration range of 0.02-5.0 mg/L, according to the US Food and Drug Administration guidelines. In addition, its clinical application was demonstrated., Results: The total run time was 1.5 minutes. For total ciprofloxacin plasma concentrations, the mean accuracy ranged from 94.5% to 105.0% across the validated range, the intraday imprecision was ≤7.6%, and the interday imprecision was ≤9.8%. For unbound ciprofloxacin plasma concentrations, the mean accuracy ranged from 92.8% to 102.1% across the validated range, the intraday imprecision was ≤7.0%, and the interday imprecision was ≤9.6%. Ciprofloxacin in plasma and ultrafiltrate remained stable for at least 96 hours at room temperature, at least 4 years at -80°C, and at least 3 freeze/thaw cycles (-80°C), with a minimum interval of 24 hours., Conclusions: The presented method is precise and accurate. It has been implemented in clinical care and research projects at a university hospital, permitting rapid determination of total and unbound ciprofloxacin., Competing Interests: S. E. Geerlings has received grants from Nordic Pharma and Vifor Pharma outside of the submitted work; R. A. A. Mathôt has received grants from Baxter/Baxalta/Shire, Bayer Schering Pharma, CSL Behring, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Zeria outside of the submitted work; R. M. van Hest received grants from Nordic Pharma outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Levamisole is used as a steroid-sparing drug for the treatment of frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children. As part of a large multicentre randomized controlled trial with levamisole, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of levamisole in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome were investigated, as well as the feasibility of using saliva as an alternative and patient-friendly matrix for determining levamisole concentrations. In this study, the authors presented the development and validation of a highly sensitive method for determining levamisole in plasma and saliva using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)., Methods: In 100 μL samples, proteins were precipitated with 750 μL acetonitrile/methanol 420:80 (v/v) with levamisole-D5 as an internal standard. Calibration standards were prepared over a range of 0.1 ng/mL-50 ng/mL. To determine ultrafiltration efficiency, the ultrafiltrate was obtained by centrifuging blank plasma samples over the filter. Both filtered and nonfiltered samples were analyzed., Results: For plasma, accuracy and within-run and between-run imprecision were between 95.0% and 100% and <14.5%, respectively, and for saliva, between 100.9% and 107.5%, and <13.3%. No significant matrix effects were observed. Samples were stable at benchtop for 24 hours and -80°C, for at least 14 months (stability experiments ongoing). The ultrafiltration efficiency of unbound concentrations in plasma was lower than 85% (58.9%) but stable, and, therefore, the observed concentration should be corrected., Conclusions: Based on observations, the developed measure can determine levamisole concentrations in participant saliva samples., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Paediatric data on CNS penetration of antiretroviral drugs are scarce., Objectives: To evaluate CNS penetration of antiretroviral drugs in HIV-infected children and explore associations with neurocognitive function., Patients and Methods: Antiretroviral drug levels were measured in paired CSF and blood samples of clinically stable HIV-infected children between 8 and 18 years old on long-term combined ART. Plasma drug concentrations were corrected for protein binding. We evaluated CNS penetration using CSF/plasma ratios and compared CSF concentrations with the IC50 as a surrogate marker for effectiveness. Blood-brain barrier permeability was assessed for possible confounding. Associations with neurocognitive function were explored using linear regression analysis., Results: Median CSF/plasma ratios (IQR) were: lopinavir 0.059 (0.024-0.157, n = 7), efavirenz 0.681 (0.555-0.819, n = 12), tenofovir 0.021 (0.020-0.024, n = 4), lamivudine 0.464 (0.331-0.607, n = 17), emtricitabine 0.365 (0.343-0.435, n = 3), nevirapine 1.203 (n = 1), zidovudine 0.718 (0.711-1.227, n = 5) and abacavir 1.344 (0.670-2.450, n = 10). CSF concentrations were below the IC50 for tenofovir (100%), emtricitabine (100%), abacavir (50%) and zidovudine (17%). Lamivudine, lopinavir, efavirenz and nevirapine concentrations were all above the IC50. All participants were virologically suppressed in blood and CSF. CSF drug concentrations were not associated with blood-brain barrier permeability or neurocognitive function., Conclusions: We showed adequate CSF concentrations of lamivudine, lopinavir, efavirenz and nevirapine, and potential suboptimal CSF concentrations of tenofovir, abacavir and emtricitabine in long-term treated HIV-infected children. None the less, the use of combined antiretroviral drugs led to adequate viral suppression., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Angiogenesis is critical to the growth of tumors. Vascularization-targeting agents, with or without cytotoxic drugs, are widely used for the treatment of several solid tumors including esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. However, little is known about the systemic effects of anti-angiogenic therapies and how this affects the pharmacokinetics and intratumoral delivery of cytotoxic agents. In this study, patient-derived xenograft mouse models of esophageal adenocarcinoma were used to identify the effects of DC101, a murine vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics and the intratumoral uptake of nab-paclitaxel (NPTX). We showed that DC101 had large systemic effects resulting in decreased vasculature of intraperitoneally located organs. As a consequence, after intraperitoneal administration of NPTX, plasma uptake (5.029 ± 4.35 vs. 25.85 ± 2.27 µM) and intratumoral delivery (5.48 ± 5.32 vs. 38.49 ± 2.805 pmol/mg) of NPTX were greatly impaired in DC101-treated animals compared to control animals. Additionally, routes of NPTX elimination were altered upon angiogenesis inhibition; unchanged renal clearance and intraperitoneal accumulation of NPTX were observed, but NPTX levels were significantly lower in the liver. Histological examination of the intestine revealed a reduced thickness of the intestinal wall following DC101 therapy and suggested seepage of intraperitoneally injected NTPX through the intestinal wall to explain its reduced uptake in liver, plasma, and tumor tissue. These data explain several adverse effects observed in the clinic when using anti-angiogenic therapies and also imply that the combined use of anti-angiogenesis and cytotoxic agents in both preclinical and clinical setting is still suboptimal.