Search

Background: Endemic to Central Africa, loiasis, caused by the vector-borne worm Loa loa, affects approximately 10 million individuals. Clinical manifestations include transient angioedema (Calabar swellings), migration of the adult worm under the eye conjunctiva (eye worm) and less specific general symptoms. Loiasis presents a significant public health challenge because L. loa-infected individuals can develop serious adverse events after taking ivermectin, the drug used to combat onchocerciasis. In this context, alternative interventions and rigorous diagnostic approaches are needed. Diagnosing loiasis is challenging because its main clinical manifestations are sporadic and non-specific. The definitive diagnosis relies on identifying adult worms migrating beneath the conjunctiva, or microfilariae (pre-larvae) in blood smears. However, "occult loiasis" (infection without blood microfilariae) is frequent. Serological rapid antibody diagnostic tests (ARTs) can provide an alternative diagnostic method. We compared a novel ART simultaneously targeting onchocerciasis (IgG4 to Ov-16 and OvOC3261, test line 1) and loiasis (IgG4 to L1-SXP-1, test line 2), called IgG4-SXP-1 biplex test) to the already established Loa-ART (all IgG isotypes to Ll-SXP-1, called pan-IgG-SXP-1 test). Methodology: Blood samples underwent both ARTs, read qualitatively and semi-quantitatively. Additionally, blood smears, skin snips, Kato-Katz method for soil-transmitted helminthiases identification and eosinophilia measurements were performed. Questionnaires gathered demographic details and loiasis-related signs. ARTs performance was compared using specific loiasis-related signs and microfilaremia as references. Discordances between the two ARTs were investigated using logistic regression models. Principal findings: Out of 971 participants, 35.4% had L. loa microfilaremia, 71.9% had already experienced loiasis-related signs, 85.1% were positive in the pan-IgG-SXP-1 test and 79.4% were positive in the IgG4-SXP-1 biplex test. In the microfilariae-positive population, the sensitivity of the rapid tests was 87.4% for the pan-IgG-SXP-1 test and 88.6% for the prototype IgG4-SXP-1 biplex test. Sensitivity was similar for both ARTs when using eye worm or Calabar swelling as references, but diagnostic performance varied based on microfilaremia levels and occult loiasis. Overall, IgG4-SXP-1 biplex test demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.1% and specificity of 47.6% for loiasis compared to the pan-IgG-SXP-1 test, leading to a Kappa coefficient estimated at 0.27 ± 0.03 for the qualitative results of the 2 ARTs. In the group that tested positive with the Pan-IgG test but negative with the IgG4-specific test, there was a lower prevalence of STH infection (p = 0.008) and elevated eosinophilia (p<0.001) compared to the general tested population. Conclusion/Significance: The sensitivity of each test was good (84–85%) but the diagnostic agreement between the two ARTs was poor, suggesting that IgG and IgG4 antibody responses should be interpreted differently. The assessment of the innovative rapid diagnostic IgG4-SXP-1 biplex test, designed for onchocerciasis and loiasis, shows encouraging sensitivity but underlines the necessity for further in vitro assessment. Author summary: Loiasis, a disease caused by the parasite Loa loa impacting approximately 10 million people in Central Africa, causes transient angioedemas called Calabar swellings and eye worm episodes. Treatment is challenging, particularly in regions where onchocerciasis, another type of filariasis, is also prevalent. We tested a new kind of test that can detect both diseases at once and compared its performance with a previously available test for loiasis. We took blood samples from 971 people living in an area of Congo where loiasis is endemic. Out of the participants, 35.4% had L. loa pre-larvae in the blood–known as microfilariae, and 72.0% had experienced loiasis-related signs. The new test demonstrated promise in detecting the disease, albeit with some likelihood of false positives. Additionally, its performance varied according to the density of microfilariae in the blood. While the results exceeded expectations, further testing is essential to ensure its reliability. If validated, this test could prove instrumental in diagnosing both loiasis and onchocerciasis, offering a valuable tool for public health interventions in affected regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The standard techniques for diagnosis of human filariasis are the microscopic examination of blood smears or skin biopsies, which are relatively invasive and poorly sensitive at low levels of infection. Recently, filarial DNA has been detected in fecal samples from non-human primates in Central Africa. The aim of this study was to demonstrate proof-of-concept of a non-invasive molecular diagnosis technique for human filariasis by targeting fragments of 12S rDNA, Cox1, ITS1 and LL20-15kDa ladder antigen-gene by conventional PCR in DNA extracted from stool samples of 52 people infected with Mansonella perstans and/or Loa loa. Of these, 10 patients were infected with soil-transmitted helminths (Trichuris trichiura and/or Ascaris lumbricoides), and none were positive for Necator americanus. Interestingly, no filarial gene fragments were detected in the stools of any of the 52 patients. Future studies should evaluate whether a co-infection with soil-transmitted helminths causing gastrointestinal bleeding and likely allowing (micro)filaria exit into the digestive tract, may facilitate the molecular detection of filarial DNA fragments in stool samples.

Background Individuals with high microfilarial densities (MFDs) of Loa loa are at risk of developing serious adverse events (SAEs) after ivermectin treatment. Pretreatment with drugs progressively reducing Loa MFDs below the risk threshold might help prevent these SAEs. We assessed the safety and efficacy of levamisole for this purpose. Methods A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, MFD-ascending trial was conducted in the Republic of the Congo. Participants were treated in 3 cohorts defined by pretreatment MFD and levamisole dose (cohort 1: 1.0kg and 1.5mg/kg; cohorts 2 and 3: 2.5mg/kg). Safety outcomes were occurrence of SAE and adverse event frequency during the first week. The efficacy outcomes were MFD reduction from baseline and proportions of individuals with at least 40% and 80% MFD reduction at day 2 (D2), D7, and D30. Results The 2 lowest doses (1.0mg/kg and 1.5mg/kg) caused no SAEs but were ineffective. Compared with placebo, 2.5mg/kg levamisole caused more mild adverse events (10/85 vs. 3/85, P =.018), a higher median reduction from baseline to D2 (-12.9% vs. +15.5%, P <.001), D7 (-4.9% vs. +18.7%, P <.001), and D30 (-0.5% vs. +13.5%, P =.036) and a higher percentage of participants with >40% MFD reduction at D2 (17.5% vs. 1.2%, P <.001), D7 (11.8% vs. 6.3%, P =.269), and D30 (18.5% vs. 9.6%, P =.107). Conclusions A single 2.5mg/kg levamisole dose induces a promising transient reduction in Loa loa MFDs and should encourage testing different regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Levamisole was initially prescribed for the treatment of intestinal worms. Because of immunomodulatory properties, levamisole has been used in inflammatory pathologies and in cancers in association with 5‐fluorouracil. Levamisole is misused as a cocaine adulterant. Post‐marketing reports have implicated levamisole in the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and its use is now limited in Europe and North America. In contrast, all other parts of the World continue to use single‐dose levamisole as an anthelmintic. The aim of this study was to identify ADRs reported after levamisole exposure in VigiBase, the World Health Organisation's pharmacovigilance database, and analyse their frequency compared to other drugs and according to levamisole type of use. Methods: All levamisole‐related ADRs were extracted from VigiBase. Disproportionality analyses were conducted to investigate psychiatric, hepatobiliary, renal, vascular, nervous, blood, skin, cardiac, musculoskeletal and general ADRs associated with levamisole and other drugs exposure. In secondary analyses, we compared the frequency of ADRs between levamisole and mebendazole and between levamisole type of use. Results: Among the 1763 levamisole‐related ADRs identified, psychiatric disorders (reporting odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals: 1.4 [1.2–2.6]), hepatobiliary disorders (2.4 [1.9–4.3]), vasculitis (6.5 [4.1–10.6]), encephalopathy (22.5 [17.4–39.9]), neuropathy (4.3 [2.9–7.1]), haematological disorders, mild rashes and musculoskeletal disorders were more frequently reported with levamisole than with other drug. The majority of levamisole‐related ADRs occurred when the drug was administrated for a non–anti‐infectious indication. Conclusion: The great majority of the levamisole‐related ADRs concerned its immunomodulatory indication and multiple‐dose regimen. Our results suggest that single‐dose treatments for anthelmintic action have a good safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Two community trials conducted from 2012 to 2018 in the Republic of Congo and the Democratic Republic of the Congo demonstrated the efficacy of semiannual mass drug administration (MDA) with albendazole (ALB) alone on lymphatic filariasis (LF). However, a high interindividual heterogeneity in the clearance of infection was observed. Methods We analyzed trial data to assess the effect of individual adherence to ALB MDA on clearance of circulating filarial antigenemia (CFA) and microfilaremia. Community residents were offered a single dose of ALB every 6 months and tested for LF with a rapid test for CFA at baseline and then annually. CFA test results were scored on a semiquantitative scale. At each round, microfilaremia was assessed in CFA-positive individuals. All CFA-positive individuals for whom at least 1 follow-up measure was available were included in the analyses. Parametric survival models were used to assess the influence of treatment adherence on LF infection indicators. Results Of 2658 individuals enrolled in the trials, 394 and 129 were eligible for analysis of CFA and microfilaremia clearance, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, and initial CFA score, the predicted mean time for clearing CFA was shorter in persons who had taken 2 doses of ALB per year (3.9 years) than in persons who had taken 1 or 0 dose (4.4 and 5.3 years; P  < .001 for both). A similar pattern was observed for microfilaremia clearance. Conclusions These results demonstrate a clear dose-response relationship for the effect of ALB on clearance of CFA and microfilaremia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Onchocerciasis elimination through mass drug administration (MDA) is hampered by coendemicity of Loa loa, as people with high L. loa microfilariae (mf) density can develop serious adverse events (SAEs) after ivermectin treatment. We assessed the geographical overlap of onchocerciasis and loiasis prevalence and estimated the number of coinfected individuals at risk of post-ivermectin SAEs in West and Central Africa from 1995 to 2025. Methods Focusing on regions with suspected loiasis transmission in 14 countries, we overlaid precontrol maps of loiasis and onchocerciasis prevalence to calculate precontrol prevalence of coinfection by 5 km2 × 5 km2 pixel, distinguishing different categories of L. loa mf intensity. Using statistical and mathematical models, we predicted prevalence of both infections and coinfection for 2015 and 2025, accounting for the impact of MDA with ivermectin. Results The number of people infected with onchocerciasis was predicted to decline from almost 19 million in 1995 to 4 million in 2025. Of these, 137 000 people were estimated to also have L. loa hypermicrofilaremia (≥20 000 L. loa mf/mL) in 1995, declining to 31 000 in 2025. In 2025, 92.8% of coinfected cases with loiasis hypermicrofilaremia are predicted to live in hypoendemic areas currently not targeted for MDA. Conclusions Loiasis coinfection is a major concern for onchocerciasis elimination in Africa. We predict that under current strategies, at least 31 000 coinfected people still require treatment for onchocerciasis in 2025 while being at risk of SAEs, justifying continued efforts in research and development for safer drugs and control strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background-Rationale: The diagnosis of Loa loa microfilaremia consists in the observation, using a microscope, of microfilariae in a sample of peripheral blood spread on a slide and subsequently stained (the "blood smear technique"). The accurate quantification of Loa loa microfilaremia is important because the choice of the first intention treatment depends on the patient's microfilaremia: severe adverse events can occur in individuals with high microfilarial densities when treated with ivermectin or diethylcarbamazine, the latter drug being the only one which can definitively cure the infection. However, despite the widespread usage of this technique and its role in guiding clinical management of the patient, estimates of its reliability remain scarce., Materials and Methods: We evaluated the reliability (reproducibility and repeatability) of blood smear technique using several sets of 10 L. loo -positive slides, randomly selected, and considered the results with regard to regulatory requirements. The slides had been prepared as part of a clinical trial conducted in Sibiti, Republic of Congo, a region where loiasis is endemic., Results: The estimated and acceptable coefficients of repeatability (NB: the lower, the better) were 13.6% and 16.0%, respectively. The estimated and acceptable coefficients of intermediate reliability (reproducibility) were 15.1% and 22.5%, respectively. The poorest coefficient of intermediate reliability was 19.5% when the tested parameter was related to the technician who performed the readings (10.7% when the reading day was changed). The inter-technician coefficient of variation assessed using 1876 L. loo -positive slides was 13.2%. The coefficient of inter-technician variation considered acceptable was estimated at 18.6%. Discussion-Conclusion. All estimated coefficients of variability were lower than the calculated acceptable coefficients suggesting reliability of the technique, although the lack of laboratory references precludes any conclusion on the quality of this diagnosis. It is imperative to implement a quality system and standardization of procedures for the diagnosis of L. loo microfilaremia, both in endemic countries and in the rest of the world, where the demand for diagnosis has been increasing for years., (Copyright © 2023 SFMTSI.)

Endemic to Central Africa, loiasis - or African eye worm (caused by the filarial nematode Loa loa) - affects more than 10 million people. Despite causing ocular and systemic symptoms, it has typically been considered a benign condition, only of public health relevance because it impedes mass drug administration-based interventions against onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis in co-endemic areas. Recent research has challenged this conception, demonstrating excess mortality associated with high levels of infection, implying that loiasis warrants attention as an intrinsic public health problem. This review summarises available information on the key parasitological, entomological, and epidemiological characteristics of the infection and argues for the mobilisation of resources to control the disease, and the development of a mathematical transmission model to guide deployment of interventions., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)