Search

Key Points: Question: What are the efficacy and safety of elinzanetant, 120 mg, in postmenopausal individuals with moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS)? Findings: In 2 pivotal phase 3 clinical trials, elinzanetant demonstrated statistically significant reductions in VMS frequency and severity vs placebo. Elinzanetant also significantly improved sleep disturbances and menopause-related quality of life vs placebo; the safety profile was favorable. Meaning: Elinzanetant is an efficacious and well-tolerated selective neurokinin-1,3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of moderate to severe VMS associated with menopause. Elinzanetant also improves sleep disturbances and menopause-related quality of life. Importance: Safe and effective nonhormonal treatments for menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are needed. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of elinzanetant, a selective neurokinin-1,3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of moderate to severe menopausal vasomotor symptoms. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two randomized double-blind phase 3 trials (OASIS 1 and 2) included postmenopausal participants aged 40 to 65 years experiencing moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (OASIS 1: 77 sites in the US, Europe, and Israel from August 27, 2021, to November 27, 2023, and OASIS 2: 77 sites in the US, Canada, and Europe from October 29, 2021, to October 10, 2023). Intervention: Once daily oral elinzanetant, 120 mg, for 26 weeks or matching placebo for 12 weeks followed by elinzanetant, 120 mg, for 14 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points included mean change in frequency and severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from baseline to weeks 4 and 12, measured by the electronic hot flash daily diary. Secondary end points included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b total T score and Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire total score from baseline to week 12. Results: Eligible participants (mean [SD] age, OASIS 1: 54.6 [4.9] years; OASIS 2: 54.6 [4.8] years) were randomized to elinzanetant (OASIS 1: n = 199; OASIS 2: n = 200) or placebo (OASIS 1: n = 197; OASIS 2: n = 200). A total of 309 (78.0%) and 324 (81.0%) completed OASIS 1 and 2, respectively. For the elinzanetant and placebo groups, the baseline mean (SD) VMS per 24 hours were 13.4 (6.6) vs 14.3 (13.9) (OASIS 1) and 14.7 (11.1) v 16.2 (11.2) (OASIS 2). Baseline VMS severity was 2.6 (0.2) vs 2.5 (0.2) (OASIS 1) and 2.5 (0.2) vs 2.5 (0.2) (OASIS 2). Elinzanetant significantly reduced VMS frequency vs placebo at week 4 (OASIS 1: −3.3 [95% CI, −4.5 to −2.1], P <.001; OASIS 2: −3.0 [95% CI, −4.4 to −1.7], P <.001) and at week 12 (OASIS 1: −3.2 [95% CI, −4.8 to −1.6], P <.001; OASIS 2: −3.2 [95% CI, −4.6 to −1.9], P <.001). Elinzanetant also improved VMS severity vs placebo at week 4 (OASIS 1: −0.3 [95% CI, −0.4 to −0.2], P <.001; OASIS 2: −0.2 [95 CI, −0.3 to −0.1], P <.001) and week 12 (OASIS 1: −0.4 [95% CI, −0.5 to −0.3], P <.001; OASIS 2: −0.3 [95% CI, −0.4 to −0.1], P <.001). Elinzanetant improved sleep disturbances and menopause-related quality of life at week 12, and the safety profile was favorable. Conclusions and Relevance: Elinzanetant was well tolerated and efficacious for moderate to severe menopausal VMS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: OASIS 1: NCT05042362, OASIS 2: NCT05099159 These 2 clinical trials evaluate the efficacy and safety of elinzanetant for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause is a common, under-reported, and undertreated chronic progressive condition requiring long-term treatment. Hypoestrogenism in the urogenital tissues is associated with bothersome dyspareunia, vulvovaginal symptoms, overactive bladder, and frequent urinary tract infections. Vaginal hormone therapies, including vaginal estrogen and intravaginal dehydroepiandrostenedione, are safe and effective and improve symptoms and clinical findings. Systemic hormone therapy treats vulvovaginal atrophy less effectively than vaginal hormone therapies with increased stress and urge urinary incontinence.Oral ospemifene effectively treats vaginal dryness and dyspareunia. Clinicians need to ask about symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause, confirm the diagnosis, and suggest appropriate treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to determine the longer-term efficacy and safety of initiating treatment for urgency-predominant urinary incontinence (UUI) in women diagnosed using a simple questionnaire rather than an extensive evaluation.Study designWomen completing a 12 week randomized controlled trial of fesoterodine therapy for UUI diagnosed by questionnaire were invited to participate in a 9 month, open-label continuation study. UUI and voiding episodes were collected using voiding diaries. Participant satisfaction was measured by questionnaire. Safety was assessed by the measurement of postvoid residual volume and adverse event monitoring; if necessary, women underwent a specialist evaluation. The longitudinal changes in UUI and voiding episodes were evaluated using linear mixed models adjusting for baseline.ResultsOf the 567 women completing the randomized trial, 498 (87.8%) took at least 1 dose of medication during this open-label study. Compared with the baseline visit in the randomized trial, fesoterodine was associated with a reduction in total incontinence episodes per day and urgency incontinence episodes per day at the end of the open-label study (adjusted mean [SE], 4.6 [0.12] to 1.2 [0.13] and 3.9 [0.11] to 0.9 [0.11], respectively, P < .0001 for both). Most women were satisfied with treatment (89%, 92%, and 93% at 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively). Twenty-six women experienced 28 serious adverse events, 1 of which was considered possibly treatment related. Twenty-two women had a specialist evaluation: 5 women's incontinence was misclassified by the 3 Incontinence Questions; none experienced harm because of misclassification.ConclusionUsing a simple validated questionnaire to diagnose and initiate treatment for UUI in community-dwelling women is safe and effective, allowing timely treatment by primary care practitioners.