1. A-qCPR risk score screening model for predicting 1-year mortality associated with hospice and palliative care in the emergency department
- Author
-
Dachen Chu, Ruei-Fang Wang, Yung-Chung Huang, Chao-Chih Lai, Ping-Yeh Fu, Chung-Hsien Chaou, Chen Yang Hsu, Sheng-Jean Huang, Hsiu-Hsi Chen, and Shih-Pin Lin
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Palliative care ,Framingham Risk Score ,Adolescent ,business.industry ,Palliative Care ,Hospices ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,General Medicine ,Emergency department ,Prognosis ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,ROC Curve ,Risk Factors ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Emergency medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Emergency Service, Hospital ,1 year mortality ,business ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
Background:Evaluating the need for palliative care and predicting its mortality play important roles in the emergency department.Aim:We developed a screening model for predicting 1-year mortality.Design:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify risk factors associated with 1-year mortality. Our risk scores based on these significant risk factors were then developed. Its predictive validity performance was evaluated using area under receiving operating characteristic analysis and leave-one-out cross-validation.Setting and participants:Patients aged 15 years or older were enrolled from June 2015 to May 2016 in the emergency department.Results:We identified five independent risk factors, each of which was assigned a number of points proportional to its estimated regression coefficient: age (0.05 points per year), qSOFA ⩾ 2 (1), Cancer (4), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score ⩾ 2 (2), and Do-Not-Resuscitate status (3). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of our screening tool given the cutoff larger than 3 points were 0.99 (0.98–0.99), 0.31 (0.29–0.32), 0.26 (0.24–0.27), and 0.99 (0.98–1.00), respectively. Those with screening scores larger than 9 points corresponding to 64.0% (60.0–67.9%) of 1-year mortality were prioritized for consultation and communication. The area under the receiving operating characteristic curves for the point system was 0.84 (0.83–0.85) for the cross-validation model.Conclusions:A-qCPR risk scores provide a good screening tool for assessing patient prognosis. Routine screening for end-of-life using this tool plays an important role in early and efficient physician-patient communications regarding hospice and palliative needs in the emergency department.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF