Search

Introduction Leucine supplementation improves muscle protein synthesis in physiological studies and has been proposed as a treatment to improve muscle mass and physical performance. We tested the effects of leucine supplementation in a randomised controlled trial enrolling patients with sarcopenia. Methods We conducted a placebo-controlled, parallel group, double-blind, randomised two-by-two factorial trial. Participants aged 70 and over with low muscle mass by bioimpedance and either low grip strength or low walk speed, were recruited from 14 UK sites. Participants were randomised to receive one year of leucine powder 2.5 g three times a day or matching placebo, plus perindopril 4 mg once daily or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the Short Physical Performance Battery, measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months, analysed using repeated-measures mixed models. Secondary outcomes included grip strength, quadriceps strength, six-minute walk distance, appendicular muscle mass measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry, quality of life measured using the EQ5D tool, falls rates and adverse events. Results We screened 320 people and randomised 145 participants, mean age 79 (SD 6) years; 78 (54%) were women and the mean SPPB was 7.0 (SD 2.4). 72 were randomised to leucine and 73 to placebo. Median adherence was the same in both groups (76% vs 76%; p < 0.001). Leucine had no significant effect on the primary outcome (adjusted treatment effect 0.1 points [95%CI -1.0 to 1.1]). No significant treatment effect was seen for any secondary outcome. There were similar numbers of adverse events in both groups (leucine 187, placebo 196) and falls rates were similar (leucine 1.9 [95%CI 0.9 to 2.9] per year; placebo 2.9 [95%CI 0.8 to 5.0] per year). Conclusion Leucine did not improve measures of physical performance, muscle mass or quality of life in older people with sarcopenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors such as perindopril have been proposed as treatments to improve muscle mass and physical performance but have not been tested in randomised controlled trials enrolling patients with sarcopenia. Methods We conducted a placebo-controlled, parallel group, double-blind, randomised two-by-two factorial trial. Participants aged 70 and over with low muscle mass by bioimpedance and either low grip strength or low walk speed, were recruited from 14 UK sites. Participants were randomised to receive one year of perindopril 4 mg once daily or matching placebo, and to receive leucine powder 2.5 g three times a day or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the Short Physical Performance Battery, measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months, analysed using repeated-measures mixed models. Secondary outcomes included grip strength, quadriceps strength, six-minute walk distance, appendicular muscle mass measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry, quality of life measured using the EQ5D tool, falls rates and adverse events. Results We screened 320 people and randomised 145 participants, mean age 79 (SD 6) years; 78 (54%) were women and the mean SPPB was 7.0 (SD 2.4). 73 were randomised to perindopril and 72 to placebo. Median adherence was lower for perindopril (76% vs 96%; p < 0.001). Perindopril had no significant effect on the primary outcome (adjusted treatment effect −0.1 points [95%CI -1.2 to 1.0]). No significant treatment effect was seen for any secondary outcome except for worse EQ5D thermometer scores in the perindopril group (treatment effect −12 points [95%CI -21 to −3]). More adverse events were seen in the perindopril group (218 vs 165) but falls rates were similar (perindopril 2.0 [95%CI 1.1 to 3.0] per year; placebo 2.8 [95%CI 0.6 to 5.1] per year). Conclusion Perindopril did not improve measures of physical performance, muscle mass or quality of life in older people with sarcopenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) in combination with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are commonly used to treat asthma, however, some children lack response to the addition of LABA. This might be partially due to the presence of the Arg16Gly polymorphism, encoded by rs1042713 G>A in the ADRB2 gene. Carrying the A allele (Arg16) at this variant has been associated with an increased risk of exacerbations despite LABA treatment. We investigated whether genotype-guided treatment improved asthma-related outcomes., Methods: We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis of two randomised controlled trials: PUFFIN (Dutch and Swiss 6-18 year-olds) and PACT (English and Scottish 12-18 year-olds). Children with uncontrolled asthma despite ICS who required a step-up in treatment were included. Participants were randomised to genotype-guided treatment or the control group with a follow-up of at least 6 months. Genotype-guided treatment consisted of adding LABA for children with ADRB2 Gly16/Gly16, whilst children with ADRB2 Arg16/Arg16 or Arg16/Gly16 were treated with double dose ICS (PUFFIN) or add-on montelukast (PACT). The primary outcome was a change in asthma control; secondary outcomes included exacerbation rate and time to exacerbation. Repeated measures mixed models and Cox regression were used., Results: Fifty-nine out of 102 (PUFFIN) and 59 out of 91 (PACT) children had at least one Arg (A allele). Amongst all 193 children, no difference was observed in asthma control between the study groups. However, genotype-guided treatment resulted in lower asthma exacerbation rates (-0.08 (95%CI -0.16 to -0.00, p = 0.04)) compared to the control group., Conclusion: Genotype-guided step-up treatment for children with uncontrolled asthma on ICS may lower asthma exacerbation rates and may be useful for personalising asthma care., (© 2024 The Author(s). Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Understanding genetic contributors to sarcopenia (age-related loss of muscle strength and mass) is key to finding effective therapies. Variants of the bradykinin receptor 2 (BDKRB2) have been linked to athletic and muscle performance. The rs1799722-9 and rs5810761 T alleles have been shown to be overrepresented in endurance athletes, possibly due to increased transcriptional rates of the receptor. These variants have been rarely studied in older people or people with sarcopenia., Methods: We performed a post hoc sub-study of the Leucine and ACE (LACE) inhibitor trial, which enrolled 145 participants aged ≥70 years with low grip strength and low gait speed. Participants' blood samples were genotyped for rs179972 using TaqMan and rs5810761 by amplification through Hotstar Taq. Genotypes were compared with outcomes of physical performance and body composition measures., Results: Data from 136 individuals were included in the analysis. For rs1799722 the genotype frequency (TT: 17, CC: 48, CT: 71) remained in Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE p = 0.248). There was no difference between the genotypes for six-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) or Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Men with the TT genotype had a significantly greater 6MWD than other genotypes (TT 400m vs CT 310m vs CC 314m, p = 0.027), and greater leg muscle mass (TT 17.59kg vs CT 15.04kg vs CC 15.65kg, p = 0.007). For rs5810761, the genotype frequency (-9-9: 31, +9+9: 43, -9+9: 60) remained in HWE (p = 0.269). The +9+9 genotype was associated with a significant change in SPPB score at 12 months (-9-9 0 vs -9+9 0 vs +9+9-1, p<0.001), suggesting an improvement. In men, the -9-9 genotype was associated with lower arm fat (-9-9 2.39kg vs -9+9 2.72kg vs +9+9 2.76kg, p = 0.019)., Conclusion: In men, the rs1799722 TT genotype was associated with longer 6MWD and greater leg muscle mass, while the rs5810761 -9-9 genotype was associated with lower arm fat mass., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Shrestha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Ageing is associated with changes in body composition including an overall reduction in muscle mass and a proportionate increase in fat mass. Sarcopenia is characterised by losses in both muscle mass and strength. Body composition and muscle strength are at least in part genetically determined, consequently polymorphisms in pathways important in muscle biology (e.g., the activin/myostatin signalling pathway) are hypothesised to contribute to the development of sarcopenia., Methods: We compared regional body composition measured by DXA with genotypes for two polymorphisms (rs10783486, minor allele frequency (MAF) = 0.26 and rs2854464, MAF = 0.26) in the activin 1B receptor (ACVR1B) determined by PCR in a cross-sectional analysis of DNA from 110 older individuals with sarcopenia from the LACE trial., Results: Neither muscle mass nor strength showed any significant associations with either genotype in this cohort. Initial analysis of rs10783486 showed that males with the AA/AG genotype were taller than GG males (174±7cm vs 170±5cm, p = 0.023) and had higher arm fat mass, (median higher by 15%, p = 0.008), and leg fat mass (median higher by 14%, p = 0.042). After correcting for height, arm fat mass remained significantly higher (median higher by 4% padj = 0.024). No associations (adjusted or unadjusted) were seen in females. Similar analysis of the rs2854464 allele showed a similar pattern with the presence of the minor allele (GG/AG) being associated with greater height (GG/AG = 174±7 cm vs AA = 170 ±5cm, p = 0.017) and greater arm fat mass (median higher by 16%, p = 0.023). Again, the difference in arm fat remained after correction for height. No similar associations were seen in females analysed alone., Conclusion: These data suggest that polymorphic variation in the ACVR1B locus could be associated with body composition in older males. The activin/myostatin pathway might offer a novel potential target to prevent fat accumulation in older individuals., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Bashir et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Angiotensin II (AII), has been suggested to promote muscle loss. Reducing AII synthesis, by inhibiting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity has been proposed as a method to inhibit muscle loss. The LACE clinical trial was designed to determine whether ACE inhibition would reduce further muscle loss in individuals with sarcopenia but suffered from low recruitment and returned a negative result. Polymorphic variation in the ACE promoter (I/D alleles) has been associated with differences in ACE activity and muscle physiology in a range of clinical conditions. This aim of this analysis was to determine whether I/D polymorphic variation is associated with muscle mass, strength, in sarcopenia or contributed to the lack of response to treatment in the LACE study., Methods: Sarcopenic individuals were recruited into a 2x2 factorial multicentre double-blind study of the effects of perindopril and/or leucine versus placebo on physical performance and muscle mass. DNA extracted from blood samples (n = 130 72 women and 58 men) was genotyped by PCR for the ACE I/D polymorphism. Genotypes were then compared with body composition measured by DXA, hand grip and quadriceps strength before and after 12 months' treatment with leucine and/or perindopril in a cross-sectional analysis of the influence of genotype on these variables., Results: Allele frequencies for the normal UK population were extracted from 13 previous studies (I = 0.473, D = 0.527). In the LACE cohort the D allele was over-represented (I = 0.412, D = 0.588, p = 0.046). This over-representation was present in men (I = 0.353, D = 0.647, p = 0.010) but not women (I = 0.458, D = 0.532, p = 0.708). In men but not women, individuals with the I allele had greater leg strength (II/ID = 18.00 kg (14.50, 21.60) vs DD = 13.20 kg (10.50, 15.90), p = 0.028). Over the 12 months individuals with the DD genotype increased in quadriceps strength but those with the II or ID genotype did not. Perindopril did not increase muscle strength or mass in any polymorphism group relative to placebo., Conclusion: Our results suggest that although ACE genotype was not associated with response to ACE inhibitor therapy in the LACE trial population, sarcopenic men with the ACE DD genotype may be weaker than those with the ACE I/D or II genotype., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Rossios et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: This trial aimed to determine the efficacy of leucine and/or perindopril in improving physical function in older people with sarcopenia., Methods: Placebo-controlled, parallel group, double-blind, randomized two-by-two factorial trial. We recruited adults aged ≥ 70 years with sarcopenia, defined as low gait speed (<0.8 m/s on 4 m walk) and/or low handgrip strength (women < 20 kg, men < 30 kg) plus low muscle mass (using sex and body mass index category-specific thresholds derived from normative UK BioBank data) from 14 UK centres. Eligible participants were randomized to perindopril 4 mg or placebo, and to oral leucine powder 2.5 g or placebo thrice daily. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the short physical performance battery (SPPB) score over 12-month follow-up by repeated-measures mixed models. Results were combined with existing systematic reviews using random-effects meta-analysis to derive summary estimates of treatment efficacy., Results: We screened 320 people and randomized 145 participants compared with an original target of 440 participants. For perindopril [n = 73, mean age 79 (SD 6), female sex 39 (53%), mean SPPB 7.1 (SD 2.3)] versus no perindopril [n = 72, mean age 79 (SD 6), female sex 39 (54%), mean SPPB 6.9 (SD 2.4)], median adherence to perindopril was lower (76% vs. 96%; P < 0.001). Perindopril did not improve the primary outcome [adjusted treatment effect -0.1 points (95%CI -1.2 to 1.0), P = 0.89]. No significant treatment benefit was seen for any secondary outcome including muscle mass [adjusted treatment effect -0.4 kg (95%CI -1.1 to 0.3), P = 0.27]. More adverse events occurred in the perindopril group (218 vs. 165), but falls rates were similar. For leucine [n = 72, mean age 78 (SD 6), female sex 38 (53%), mean SPPB 7.0 (SD 2.1)] versus no leucine [n = 72, mean age 79 (SD 6), female sex 40 (55%), mean SPPB 7.0 (SD 2.5)], median adherence was the same in both groups (76% vs. 76%; P = 0.99). Leucine did not improve the primary outcome [adjusted treatment effect 0.1 point (95%CI -1.0 to 1.1), P = 0.90]. No significant treatment benefit was seen for any secondary outcome including muscle mass [adjusted treatment effect -0.3 kg (95%CI -1.0 to 0.4), P = 0.47]. Meta-analysis of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker trials showed no clinically important treatment effect for the SPPB [between-group difference -0.1 points (95%CI -0.4 to 0.2)]., Conclusions: Neither perindopril nor leucine improved physical performance or muscle mass in this trial; meta-analysis did not find evidence of efficacy of either ACE inhibitors or leucine as treatments to improve physical performance., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders.)

Introduction: The A allele of rs1042713 (Arg16 amino acid) in the β 2 -adrenoreceptor is associated with poor response to long-acting β 2 -agonist (LABA) in young people with asthma. Our aim was to assess whether the prescribing of second-line controller with LABA or a leukotriene receptor antagonist according to Arg16Gly genotype would result in improvements in Pediatric Asthma-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ)., Methods: We performed a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) via a primary care clinical research network covering England and Scotland. We enrolled participants aged 12-18 years with asthma taking inhaled corticosteroids. 241 participants (mean±sd age 14.7±1.91 years) were randomised (1:1) to receive personalised care (genotype directed prescribing) or standard guideline care. Following a 4-week run-in participants were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was change in PAQLQ. Asthma control, asthma exacerbation frequency and healthcare utilisation were secondary outcomes., Results: Genotype-directed prescribing resulted in an improvement in PAQLQ compared to standard care (0.16, 95% CI 0.00-0.31; p=0.049), although this improvement was below the pre-determined clinical threshold of 0.25. The AA genotype was associated with a larger improvement in PAQLQ with personalised versus standard care (0.42, 95% CI 0.02-0.81; p=0.041)., Conclusion: This is the first RCT demonstrating that genotype-driven asthma prescribing is associated with a significant improvement in a clinical outcome compared to standard care. Adolescents with the AA homozygous genotype benefited most. The potential role of such β 2 -adrenoceptor genotype directed therapy in younger and more severe childhood asthma warrants further exploration., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: All authors report study funding from The Henry Smith Charity and Action Medical Research. J. Grigg reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, Medimmune and BV Pharma, during the conduct of the study. F. Hogarth reports grants from University of Sussex, during the conduct of the study. B. Lipworth reports other (equipment) from GSK, grants, personal fees for advisory board work, consultancy and lectures, and non-financial support for meeting attendance from AstraZeneca, Chiesi and Teva, personal fees for advisory board work from Novartis, grants, personal fees for consultancy and lectures, and non-financial support for meeting attendance from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees for consultancy from Dr Reddys, Sandoz, Cipla and Glenmark, during the conduct of the study; personal fees for consultancy from Lupin and Vectura, grants and personal fees for consultancy from Sanofi Regeneron, outside the submitted work; and the author's son is an employee of AstraZeneca., (Copyright ©The authors 2021. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)