Search

Purpose: The RI-alpha regulatory subunit of protein kinase A type 1 (PKA) is constitutively overexpressed in human cancer cell lines and is associated with active cell growth and neoplastic transformation. This report examined the association between PKA expression and the endpoints of biochemical failure (BF), local failure (LF), distant metastasis (DM), cause-specific mortality (CSM), and overall mortality in men treated with radiotherapy, with or without short-term androgen deprivation in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 86-10.Methods and Materials: Pretreatment archival diagnostic tissue samples from 80 patients were stained for PKA by immunohistochemical methods from a parent cohort of 456 cases. PKA intensity was scored manually and by image analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model for overall mortality and Fine and Gray's regression models for CSM, DM, LF and BF were then applied to determine the relationship of PKA expression to the endpoints.Results: The pretreatment characteristics of the missing and determined PKA groups were not significantly different. On univariate analyses, a high PKA staining intensity was associated with BF (image analysis, continuous variable, p = 0.022), LF (image analysis, dichotomized variable, p = 0.011), CSM (manual analysis, p = 0.037; image analysis, continuous, p = 0.014), and DM (manual analysis, p = 0.029). On multivariate analyses, the relationships to BF (image analysis, continuous, p = 0.03), LF (image analysis, dichotomized, p = 0.002), and DM remained significant (manual analysis, p = 0.018). In terms of CSM, a trend toward an association was seen (manual analysis, p = 0.08; image analysis, continuous, p = 0.09).Conclusion: PKA overexpression was significantly related to patient outcome and is a potentially useful biomarker for identifying high-risk prostate cancer patients who might benefit from a PKA knockdown strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The impact of age on prostate cancer (PCa) outcome has been controversial; therefore, we analyzed the effect of age on overall survival (OS), distant metastasis, prostate cancer-specific death (PCSD), and nonprostate cancer death (NPCD) on patients with locally advanced PCa., Methods and Materials: Patients who participated in four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) phase III trials, 8531, 8610, 9202, and 9413, were studied. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for OS analysis, and cumulative events analysis with Fine and Gray's regression was used for analyses of metastasis, PCSD, and NPCD., Results: Median follow-up of 4,128 patients with median age of 70 (range, 43-88 years) was 7.3 years. Most patients had high-risk disease: cT3 to cT4 (54%) and Gleason scores (GS) of 7 (45%) and 8 to 10 (27%). Older age (≤70 vs. >70 years) predicted for decreased OS (10-year rate, 55% vs. 41%, respectively; p<0.0001) and increased NPCD (10-year rate, 28% vs. 46%, respectively; p<0.0001) but decreased metastasis (10-year rate, 27% vs. 20%, respectively; p<0.0001) and PCSD (10-year rate, 18% vs. 14%, respectively; p<0.0001). To account for competing risks, outcomes were analyzed in 2-year intervals, and age-dependent differences in metastasis and PCSD persisted, even in the earliest time periods. When adjusted for other covariates, an age of >70 years remained associated with decreased OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-1.70] p<0.0001) but with decreased metastasis (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.63-0.83] p<0.0001) and PCSD (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66-0.92] p<0.0001). Finally, the impact of the duration of androgen deprivation therapy as a function of age was evaluated., Conclusions: These data support less aggressive PCa in older men, independent of other clinical features. While the biological underpinning of this finding remains unknown, stratification by age in future trials appears to be warranted., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are associated with greater risk of coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction in men with prostate cancer, but little is known about their potential effects on cardiovascular mortality. We assessed the relationship between duration of GnRHa therapy and cardiovascular mortality in a large randomized trial of men treated with short-term versus longer-term adjuvant goserelin and radiation therapy (RT) for locally advanced prostate cancer., Methods: From 1992 to 1995, 1554 men with locally advanced prostate cancer (T2c-4, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] <150 ng/ml) received RT and 4 mo of goserelin and then were randomized to no additional therapy (arm 1) or 24 mo adjuvant goserelin (arm 2) in a phase 3 trial (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 92-02). Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between treatment arm and cardiovascular mortality. Covariates included age, prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypertension, diabetes (DM), race, PSA, Gleason score, and stage., Results: After median follow-up of 8.1 yr, 185 cardiovascular-related deaths had occurred. No increase in cardiovascular mortality occurred for men receiving a longer duration of goserelin. At 5 yr, cardiovascular mortality for men receiving longer-term adjuvant goserelin was 5.9% versus 4.8% with short-term goserelin (Gray's p=0.16). In multivariate analyses, treatment arm was not significantly associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.47; p=0.58; when censoring at time of salvage goserelin, HR=1.02, 95%CI, 0.73-1.43; p=0.9). Traditional cardiac risk factors, including age, prevalent CVD, and DM, were significantly associated with greater cardiovascular mortality., Conclusions: Longer duration of adjuvant GnRHa therapy does not appear to increase cardiovascular mortality in men with locally advanced prostate cancer.

Background: Greater body mass index (BMI) is associated with shorter time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure following radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy (RT). Whether BMI is associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) was investigated in a large randomized trial of men treated with RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for locally advanced prostate cancer., Methods: Between 1987 and 1992, 945 eligible men with locally advanced prostate cancer were enrolled in a phase 3 trial (RTOG 85-31) and randomized to RT and immediate goserelin or RT alone followed by goserelin at recurrence. Height and weight data were available at baseline for 788 (83%) subjects. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relations between BMI and all-cause mortality, PCSM, and nonprostate cancer mortality. Covariates included age, race, treatment arm, history of prostatectomy, nodal involvement, Gleason score, clinical stage, and BMI., Results: The 5-year PCSM rate for men with BMI <25 kg/m(2) was 6.5%, compared with 13.1% and 12.2% in men with BMI > or =25 to <30 and BMI > or =30, respectively (Gray's P = .005). In multivariate analyses, greater BMI was significantly associated with higher PCSM (for BMI > or =25 to <30, hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.27, P = .04; for BMI > or =30, HR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.01-2.66, P = .04). BMI was not associated with nonprostate cancer or all-cause mortality., Conclusions: Greater baseline BMI is independently associated with higher PCSM in men with locally advanced prostate cancer. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the mechanism(s) for increased cancer-specific mortality and to assess whether weight loss after prostate cancer diagnosis alters disease course., (2007 American Cancer Society)

Purpose: Bcl-2 and bax are proteins with opposing roles in apoptosis regulation; yet abnormal expression of either has been associated with failure after radiotherapy (RT). In this study we examined bcl-2 and bax expression as predictive markers in men treated with radiotherapy +/- androgen deprivation on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol 86-10., Experimental Design: Suitable archival diagnostic tissue was obtained from 119 (26%) patients for bcl-2 analysis and 104 (23%) patients for bax analysis. Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis was used to determine the relationship of abnormal bcl-2 and bax expression to the end points of local failure, distant metastasis, cause-specific mortality, and overall mortality. Bcl-2 overexpression was classified as any tumor cell cytoplasmic staining and altered bax expression was classified as greater or lesser cytoplasmic staining intensity of tumor cells as compared with adjacent normal prostate epithelium., Results: The study cohort exhibited bcl-2 overexpression in 26% (n = 30) of cases and abnormal bax expression in 47% (n = 49) of cases. A borderline significant relationship was observed between abnormal bax expression and higher Gleason score (p = 0.08). In univariate and multivariate analyses, there was no statistically significant relationship seen between abnormal bcl-2 or bax expression and outcome., Conclusions: Abnormal bcl-2 and bax expression were not related to any of the end points tested. The cohort examined was comprised of patients with locally advanced disease and it is possible that these markers may be of greater value in men with earlier-stage prostate cancer.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of pentosanpolysulfate (PPS) in the treatment of gastrointestinal tract sequelae of radiotherapy., Methods: Eligible patients were those with grade 1 to 3 radiation related proctitis, diarrhea and/or melena. At least 4 weeks had to elapse since the completion of the radiotherapy course. Patients with bleeding diathesis or ulcers, and patients receiving anticoagulants or chemotherapy were excluded. Stratification criteria included the type of sequelae (proctitis, diarrhea, melena), the severity grade and the onset (<3 months post-RT, >3 months post-RT). Patients were randomized to one of the following arms: 100 mg PPS 3 times per day (300 mg/day), 200 mg PPS 3 times per day (600 mg/day), or placebo 3 times per day. If there was no improvement in symptoms after 2 months, the protocol treatment was discontinued. If the symptoms improved or resolved, the protocol treatment was continued for additional 4 months. Patients under treatment were evaluated monthly, than every 2 to 3 months for the next 18 months. A symptom assessment questionnaire was used to measure quality of life endpoints., Results: From June 1999 to March 2001 180 patients were accessioned from 34 institutions. A total of 168 were analyzable. Neither the best observed response within 3 months for the entire population, nor the response rate within sequelae category or the quality of life measures differed significantly between the 3 arms of the study., Conclusion: Administration of PPS has not been associated with an improvement in the clinical course of radiation related morbidity of the gastrointestinal tract.

Purpose: We examined overall and disease-specific survival outcomes both from the time of initial treatment and from the start of salvage hormone therapy (HT), by the extent of disease progression at the time salvage HT was started in patients treated on RTOG Protocol 86-10., Methods: [corrected] With a median follow-up of 9.0 years, 247 patients (54%) had received subsequent salvage HT. The overall survival (OVS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared by the extent of disease progression at the time salvage HT was started., Results: For those patients with distant metastases (DM) present at the start of salvage HT, the OVS and DSS were significantly reduced when compared to [corrected] those with DM absent at the time salvage HT was started (OVS at 8 years, 31% vs. 58%; DSS at 8 years, 38% vs. 65%). A statistically significant increase in DSS was observed among the 143 patients with DM absent when patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) less than 20 were compared with those with PSA greater than 20 at the time salvage HT was started., Conclusion: [corrected] The DSS and the OVS of the relapsed patient are decreased in those with more extensive disease at the time of salvage HT. However, because this protocol could not evaluate the effect of posttreatment PSA velocity on outcomes, which is likely a better predictor of long-term success with salvage HT, these results cannot be taken to demonstrate that early salvage HT in patients with long posttreatment PSA doubling times is necessary for longer survival.

Purpose: To determine the overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicity associated with concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy for completely resected patients with stage II and IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Eighty-eight eligible patients had surgical resection for pathologic stage II or IIIA disease and received postoperative paclitaxel and carboplatin. Concurrent thoracic radiotherapy at 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions for 6 weeks (1.8 Gy/d, 5 days/wk) was given during cycles 1 and 2. A boost of 10.8 Gy in six fractions was given for extracapsular nodal extension or T3 lesions., Results: Treatment compliance was acceptable, with 93% compliance for radiation therapy and 86% for chemotherapy completion. The median duration of follow-up was 56.7 months (range, 17 to 61 months). The median overall survival time was 56.3 months, with 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates of 86%, 70%, and 61%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3- year progression-free survival rates were 70%, 57%, and 50%, respectively. Brain metastasis occurred as the sole site of first failure in 11%, and 9% failed in other metastatic sites as first failure. Of the 43 patients who died, the cause of death was the treated cancer in 31 (35%). Local failure was a component of first failure in 15% of patients. Toxicities were acceptable. An overall survival comparison to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3590 is favorable., Conclusion: The mature results of this trial suggest an improved overall and progression-free survival in this group of resected NSCLC patients, compared with previously reported trials. A phase III trial comparing this treatment regimen with standard therapy seems warranted.

Purpose: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 85-31 was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant androgen suppression, using goserelin, in unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT)., Methods and Materials: Eligible patients were those with palpable primary tumor extending beyond the prostate (clinical Stage T3) or those with regional lymphatic involvement. Patients who had undergone prostatectomy were eligible if penetration through the prostatic capsule to the margin of resection and/or seminal vesicle involvement was documented histologically. Stratification was based on histologic differentiation, nodal status, acid phosphatase status, and prior prostatectomy. The patients were randomized to either RT and adjuvant goserelin (Arm I) or RT alone followed by observation and application of goserelin at relapse (Arm II). In Arm I, the drug was to be started during the last week of RT and was to be continued indefinitely or until signs of progression., Results: Between 1987 and 1992, when the study was closed, 977 patients were entered: 488 to Arm I and 489 to Arm II. As of July 2003, the median follow-up for all patients was 7.6 years and for living patients was 11 years. At 10 years, the absolute survival rate was significantly greater for the adjuvant arm than for the control arm: 49% vs. 39%, respectively (p = 0.002). The 10-year local failure rate for the adjuvant arm was 23% vs. 38% for the control arm (p <0.0001). The corresponding 10-year rates for the incidence of distant metastases and disease-specific mortality was 24% vs. 39% (p <0.001) and 16% vs. 22% (p = 0.0052), respectively, both in favor of the adjuvant arm., Conclusion: In a population of patients with unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate, androgen suppression applied as an adjuvant after definitive RT was associated not only with a reduction in disease progression but in a statistically significant improvement in absolute survival. The improvement in survival appeared preferentially in patients with a Gleason score of 7-10.

Purpose: To update the effect of immediate androgen suppression in conjunction with standard external-beam irradiation versus radiation alone on a group of histologically lymph node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate., Materials and Methods: A national prospective randomized trial (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31) of standard external-beam irradiation plus immediate androgen suppression versus external-beam irradiation alone was initiated in 1985 for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. One hundred seventy-three patients in this trial had histologically involved lymph nodes. Ninety-eight patients received radiation plus immediate androgen suppression (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonist), whereas 75 patients received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation instituted at the time of relapse., Results: With a median follow-up of 6.5 years for all patients and 9.5 years for living patients, estimated progression-free survival with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level less than 1.5 ng/mL at 5 and 9 years was 54% and 33%, respectively, for patients who received immediate LHRH agonist versus 10% [corrected] and 4% for patients who received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation instituted at time of relapse (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis revealed radiation therapy and immediate hormonal manipulation as having a statistically significant impact on all end points analyzed: absolute survival, disease-specific failure, metastatic failure, and biochemical control with PSA less than 4 ng/mL and less than 1.5 ng/mL., Conclusion: Pending the results of randomized trials, patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate who have pathologically involved pelvic lymph nodes (pathologic node-positive or clinical stage D1) should be considered for external-beam irradiation plus immediate hormonal manipulation rather than radiation alone with hormone manipulation at the time of relapse.

Purpose: A phase III, randomized, double-blind study was conducted by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group to determine the efficacy and toxicity of oral glutamine for the prevention of acute diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy (RT)., Patients and Methods: All 129 patients enrolled from 14 institutions between February 1998 and October 1999 were eligible. Patients received 4 g of glutamine or placebo orally, twice a day, beginning with the first or second day of RT and continuing for 2 weeks after RT. During treatment, patients were assessed weekly for toxicity, and a bowel function questionnaire was administered. The primary measures of treatment efficacy were diarrhea levels measured by maximum grade of diarrhea, incidence of diarrhea, and average diarrhea score. After completion of RT, the bowel function questionnaire was administered weekly for 4 weeks and at 12 and 24 months. Toxicity was measured by National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria., Results: The median age of patients was 69 years (range, 34 to 86 years). The two treatment arms were balanced with respect to all baseline factors. There were no significant differences in toxicity by treatment. Quality-of-life scores and the mean number of problems reported on the bowel function questionnaire were virtually identical for both treatment groups. The incidence of grade 3 or higher diarrhea was 20% for the glutamine arm and 19% for the placebo arm (P =.99). The maximum number of stools per day was 5.1 for the glutamine arm and 5.2 for the placebo arm (P =.99)., Conclusion: There is no evidence of a beneficial effect of glutamine during pelvic RT.

In the United States, radical cystectomy is viewed as the gold standard and, with few exceptions, is the only treatment recommended for patients with invasive bladder cancer. In many areas of cancer treatment, however, the trend in the 1990s has been toward organ conservation using combined chemotherapy and radiation with or without conservative local surgery. For patients with breast, esophageal, anal, and laryngeal cancers as well as limb sarcomas, conservative therapy often is recommended. However, invasive bladder cancer has not been viewed generally as a condition that allows for conservative management. In the past 15 years, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has completed six prospective protocols of combined-modality therapy for patients with muscle-invasive cancer who were candidates for cystectomy. Bladder preservation with intravesical surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were combined as initial treatment, with radical cystectomy recommended for incomplete responders. Five of the RTOG protocols were Phase I-II trials of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and one protocol was a Phase III trial that tested the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate, cisplatin, and vinblastine. A total of 415 patients were entered on these trials. The 5-year overall survival rate was approximately 50%, with three-quarters of those patients achieving a cure for their bladder cancer while maintaining a functioning bladder. The current RTOG protocol and its successor are directed toward better tolerated and potentially more effective chemotherapy regimens that may result in a high protocol compliance rate and, possibly, a higher overall survival rate. The trimodality therapeutic approach used in all of these RTOG protocols was more effective compared with the radiation monotherapy offered in the 1970s and with protocols that used only chemotherapy. Trimodality therapy with selective bladder preservation is not designed to take the place of radical cystectomy; however, it may be offered as a reasonable alternative to patients with invasive bladder cancer who are not willing to undergo radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. A bladder-sparing strategy may be offered appropriately to highly selected patients with the understanding that radical cystectomy is an available option in those who fail combined radiation and chemotherapy with no diminution in survival related to the delay in cystectomy., (Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society)

Purpose: We assessed the impact of race on survival in men treated with external beam radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy for localized prostate cancer in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group randomized trials., Materials and Methods: Between 1975 and 1992, 2,048 men were treated for clinically localized prostate cancer in 1 of 4 consecutive prospective phase III randomized trials. After excluding nonblack and nonwhite men 2,012 remained for analysis. Patients were included in this analysis if they were deemed evaluable and eligible for the trial, and followup information and centrally reviewed pathological results were available. Short-term hormonal therapy consisted of goserelin acetate and flutamide administered 2 months before and during radiotherapy. Long-term hormonal therapy consisted of adjuvant goserelin acetate, which was generally given for 2 years or more. Pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) findings were available in 430 cases (21%), including 213 treated with radiotherapy alone, 60 treated with short-term hormonal therapy and 157 on long-term hormonal therapy. Mean pretreatment PSA was 68.8 and 35.2 ng./ml. in black and white patients, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the impact of previously defined risk groups on overall and disease specific survival. Multivariate analysis was done for the significance of race using a stratified Cox model. Median followup in patients treated in early and late studies exceeded 11 and 6 years, respectively., Results: On univariate analysis black race was associated with lower overall and disease specific survival (p = 0.04, RR = 1.24 and p = 0.016, RR = 1.41, respectively). After adjusting for risk group and treatment type (with or without short-term or long-term hormonal therapy) race was no longer associated with outcome (p >0.05). The trend for a persistent difference in survival was likely due to the higher tumor burden in black men, as reflected in higher PSA., Conclusions: As previously reported, tumor grade (Gleason score), palpation T stage, lymph node status, pretreatment PSA and treatment type are major predictors of overall and disease specific survival. We noted no evidence that race has independent prognostic significance in patients treated for prostate cancer in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group prospective randomized trials.

Purpose: To compare, by a secondary analysis, the therapeutic benefits of androgen suppression in protocol prostate cancer patients with relapse after radiotherapy (RT) for locally advanced disease who, in the Phase III trial beginning in 1987, were assigned to receive or not receive a short course of neoadjuvant maximal androgen suppression before definitive RT., Methods and Materials: Between 1987 and 1991, 456 patients were entered in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trail 86-10 and randomized to receive (Arm I) or not to receive (Arm II) neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (HT), which was 4 months of goserelin (3.6 mg every 4 weeks) and flutamide (250 mg t.i.d.) before and during RT for bulky T2-T4 tumors. The overall and disease-specific survival after both randomization and salvage HT for patients with relapse was evaluated, as well as the duration of response in those patients undergoing salvage HT. The outcomes in patients who had received neoadjuvant HT vs. those who had not were compared. The median follow-up after randomization for all alive patients was 9.0 years and was 5.5 years for alive patients after beginning salvage HT., Results: Fewer patients received salvage HT on Arm I than on Arm II (45% vs. 63%, p <0.001). The outcomes by randomized treatment arm (I vs. II) from the time of beginning salvage HT were similar. At 5 years after salvage HT, the overall survival rates were 41% and 41% and the disease-specific survival rates were 50% and 50%. At 8 years after randomization, the overall survival rates were 47% and 44% and the disease-specific survival rates were 55% and 56%., Conclusion: Although a 4-month course of neoadjuvant and concurrent maximum androgen suppression and RT (compared with RT alone) significantly increases the freedom from relapse rate and freedom from receiving salvage HT, it does not compromise the long-term beneficial effect of subsequent salvage HT, if needed for relapse. These findings with long follow-up in patients treated for locally advanced disease diagnosed 9-14 years previously should help allay concerns of the possible development of "resistance" to androgen suppression when 4-month courses of neoadjuvant HT are used before primary treatment.

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that androgen ablation before and during radiotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate may, by reducing tumor bulk and enhancing tumor cell kill, improve locoregional control and ultimately survival., Methods and Materials: The study was conducted from 1987 to 1991. Eligible patients were those with bulky tumors (T2--T4) with or without pelvic lymph node involvement and without evidence of distant metastases. They were randomized to receive goserelin, 3.6 mg every 4 weeks; and flutamide, 250 mg t.i.d. for 2 months before radiation therapy and during radiation therapy (Arm I), or radiation therapy alone (Arm II). Of 471 randomized patients, 456 were evaluable: 226 on Arm I and 230 on Arm II., Results: As of November 1999, the median follow-up has reached 6.7 years for all patients and 8.6 years for alive patients. At 8 years, androgen ablation has been associated with an improvement in local control (42% vs. 30%, p = 0.016), reduction in the incidence of distant metastases (34% vs. 45%, p = 0.04), disease-free survival (33% vs. 21%, p = 0.004), biochemical disease-free survival = PSA <1.5 (24% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001), and cause-specific mortality (23% vs. 31%, p = 0.05). However, subset analysis indicates that the beneficial effect of short-term androgen ablation appears preferentially in patients with Gleason score 2--6. In that population, there is a highly significant improvement in all endpoints, including survival (70% vs. 52%, p = 0.015). In patients with Gleason 7--10 tumors, the regimen has not resulted in a significant enhancement in either locoregional control or survival., Conclusion: In patients with Gleason score 2--6 carcinoma of the prostate, a short course of androgen ablation administered before and during radiotherapy has been associated with a highly significant improvement in local control, reduction in disease progression, and overall survival.

Purpose: To determine the potential advantage of androgen ablation following standard external-beam radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced (clinical or pathologic T3; clinical or pathologic node positive) carcinoma of the prostate., Methods and Materials: In 1987 the RTOG initiated a Phase III trial of long-term adjuvant goserelin in definitively irradiated patients with carcinoma of the prostate. A total of 977 patients were accrued to the study of which 945 remain analyzable: 477 on the adjuvant hormone arm (Arm I); and 468 on the radiation only arm (Arm II) with hormones initiated at relapse. The initial results were reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 1997., Results: With a median follow up of 5.6 years for all patients and 6.0 years for living patients local failure at 8 years was 23% for Arm I and 37% for Arm II (p < 0.0001). Distant metastasis was likewise favorably impacted with the immediate use of hormonal manipulation with a distant metastasis rate in Arm I of 27% and 37% in Arm II (p < 0.0001). Disease-free survival (NED survival) and NED survival with PSA of 1.5 ng/mL (bNED) or less were both statistically significant in favor of the immediate hormone arm (both p < 0.0001). Cause-specific failure was not statistically different with a cause-specific failure of 16% for Arm I and 21% in Arm II (p = 0.23). Overall survival was likewise not statistically different between two arms, with a 49% overall survival at 8 years in Arm I and 47% in Arm II (p = 0.36). Subset analysis of centrally reviewed Gleason 8-10 patients who did not undergo prostatectomy showed that for patients receiving radiation therapy plus adjuvant hormones there was a statistically significant improvement in both absolute (p = 0.036) and cause-specific survival (p = 0.019)., Conclusions: Use of long-term adjuvant androgen deprivation in addition to definitive radiation therapy results in a highly significant improvement in regards to local control, freedom from distant metastasis, and biochemical free survival in unfavorable prognosis patients with carcinoma of the prostate.

Purpose: Gleason score (GS), T stage, and pathologic lymph node status have been described as major independent predictors of death due to prostate cancer in men treated with external beam radiotherapy (XRT). In this analysis we combine these three factors to define prognostic subgroups that correlate with disease-specific survival (DSS) death from prostate cancer., Methods and Materials: Men entered on one of four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Phase III randomized trials between 1975 and 1992, for clinically localized prostate cancer (CAP) (n = 1557), were selected for this analysis. Patients were included if: 1) they were evaluable, and eligible for the trial; 2) they received no hormonal therapy with their initial treatment; and 3) follow-up was available. For this study a DSS event was declared if: 1) death was certified as due to CAP; 2) death was due to complications of treatment; or 3) death was from unknown causes with active malignancy. The median follow-up for patients treated on early and late RTOG studies exceeded 11 and 6 years respectively. Subgroups were identified based on their pretreatment GS, T-stage, and lymph node such that patients with similar risk of dying from prostate cancer were combined., Results: By combining patients with similar DSS, four subgroups were identified. Risk Group 1 patients had a GS = 2-6, and T1-2Nx; Group 2: GS = 2-6, T3Nx; or GS = 2-6, N+, or GS = 7, T1-2Nx; Group 3: T3Nx, GS = 7; or N+, GS = 7, or T1-2Nx, GS = 8-10; and Group 4 patients were T3Nx, GS = 8-10, or N+, GS = 8-10. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year DSS was 96%, 86%, and 72%; 94%, 75%, and 61%; 83%, 62%, and 39%; and 64%, 34%, and 27% for Groups 1 through 4, respectively., Conclusions: Recognition of these four risk groups provides a basis for estimating the long-term DSS for men treated with XRT alone and should facilitate the design of future prospective randomized trials.

Purpose: To assess the impact of short-term and long-term androgen suppression on the disease-specific and overall survival of 2200 men treated with radiotherapy on one of 5 prospective randomized trials when stratified by prognostic risk groups., Methods and Materials: Between 1975 and 1992, 2742 men were treated for clinically localized prostate cancer on one of 5 consecutive prospective Phase III randomized trials. Patients were selected for this analysis if they were deemed evaluable and eligible for the trial, and if follow-up information was available. For this analysis patients were stratified into four previously described prognostic risk groups: Group 1 patients had a Gleason score (GS) = 2-6, and T1-2Nx; Group 2: GS = 2-6, T3Nx; or GS = 2-6, N+, or GS = 7, T1-2Nx; Group 3: T3Nx, GS = 7; or N+, GS = 7, or T1-2Nx, GS = 8-10; and Group 4 patients were T3Nx, GS = 8-10, or N+, GS = 8-10. The median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 25 ng/ml for the 434 evaluable patients for whom this information was available. The median follow-up times for patients treated on early studies exceeded 11 years, and for more recent studies 6 years., Results: Risk group 2 patients with "bulky" or T3 disease appeared to have a disease-specific survival benefit at 8 years with the addition of 4 months of goserelin and flutamide. Group 3 and 4 patients were noted to have an approximately 20% higher survival at 8 years with the addition of long-term hormonal therapy (p < or =0.0004)., Conclusions: Based on this meta-analysis of RTOG trials, subsets of patients can be identified who either do not appear to benefit from the use of hormonal therapy, benefit from short-term hormonal therapy, or who benefit only from long-term hormonal therapy. These observations should be confirmed by prospective randomized trials before they can be considered conclusive. In the meantime, however, these observations provide rational guidelines for deciding who should receive hormonal therapy and for how long.

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of immediate androgen suppression in conjunction with standard external beam irradiation (RT) versus RT alone on a group of men after prostatectomy who had indications for adjuvant treatment., Methods: A national prospective randomized trial (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 85-31) comparing standard external beam RT plus immediate androgen suppression versus external beam RT alone with delayed hormonal treatment at relapse was initiated for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. One hundred thirty-nine of the patients in this trial had indications for adjuvant treatment after prostatectomy (eg, capsular penetration, seminal vesicle involvement). Seventy-one of the patients received RT with immediate androgen suppression (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonist); 68 patients received RT alone with hormonal manipulation instituted only at the time of relapse., Results: With a median follow-up of 5 years, the estimated progression-free survival rate (failure defined as prostate-specific antigen [PSA] greater than 0.5 ng/mL) was 65% for the men who received combination therapy and 42% for those treated by RT alone with hormones reserved for relapse (P = 0.002). Differences in the rates of freedom from biochemical relapse were observed when failure was defined as PSA of 1.0 to 3.9 ng/mL (71% versus 46%; P = 0.008) and PSA greater than 4.0 ng/mL (76% versus 55%; P = 0.05), respectively. No differences were observed between the groups with respect to the end points of local control, distant failure, and overall survival. The use of immediate androgen suppression (ie, LHRH agonists) and the absence of pathologic nodal involvement were independently associated with prolongation of freedom from biochemical relapse by multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Patients with prostate cancer and indications for postoperative RT should be considered for combined RT and hormonal manipulation. Because statistically significant advantages for this experimental approach could not be defined for all end points studied (in particular, overall survival), efforts should be made to enroll these patients in the recently activated RTOG trial (96-01) comparing RT plus placebo to the combination of RT plus Casodex in the postoperative setting.

Purpose: We assess the relative importance of the several pretreatment characteristics in predicting death from prostate cancer in patients treated with curative intent with external beam radiotherapy alone., Materials and Methods: Patients entered on 4 prospective phase III randomized trials conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group between 1975 and 1992 were selected for this analysis if they were deemed evaluable and eligible for the trial, they had received no hormonal therapy with initial treatment and followup information was available. A disease specific survival event was declared if death was certified as due to prostate cancer, complications of treatment or unknown causes with clinically active malignancy. Median followup for patients treated on early and late studies exceeded 11 and 6 years, respectively., Results: Most of the patients (1,557) had tumors clinically staged as T3 (59%), and 87 (36%) with clinically staged T1-2 tumors had pathologically positive lymph nodes. On multivariate analysis Gleason score, clinical stage and nodal status were associated with a less favorable overall and disease specific survival, whereas others factors, such as age and race, were not. A Gleason score of 8 to 10 was associated with a high risk of dying of prostate cancer in the first 5 years (risk ratio 20.0, p = 0.0001). The 10-year disease specific survival for patients with a Gleason score of 2 to 5, 6 to 7 and 8 to 10 was 87, 75 and 44%, respectively, following radiotherapy. Based on published reports these rates were higher than expected with observation alone., Conclusions: In the first 10 years Gleason score was the single most important predictor of death. Gleason score should be incorporated into the current clinical staging system.

Purpose: This study was conducted to see what fraction of prostate cancer patients with biopsy-proven nodes are free of cancer 10 years after radiation treatment., Methods and Materials: RTOG protocol #75-06 included 90 patients with biopsy-proven pelvic nodal involvement treated with radiation. They have been continuously follow-up since treatment. When feasible, current prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels have been solicited from patients clinically cancer-free (no evidence of disease, NED) at 10 years, to confirm cure., Results: The 10-year survival was 29%, the 10-year clinical NED survival 7%. PSA levels were obtained in 2 of 5 10-year clinical NED patients, they were both less than 0.8 ng/ml. The 2 proven cures were both clinical stage T-3, Gleason Score 6 and 8, and had 2 and 1 positive nodes, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed Gleason sum was significantly associated with clinical survival without disease., Conclusion: A small fraction of node-positive patients are cured at 10-year follow-up by radiation therapy (2 of 90 with PSA +3 of 90 by clinical endpoints). Innovative treatment programs should be directed at node-positive patients in an effort to improve the fraction cured.

Purpose: To evaluate survival and time to metastatic disease in patients treated for localized prostatic carcinoma in a Phase III radiotherapy (RT) protocol, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 77-06. Patients with T18N0M0 (A2) or T2N0M0 (B) disease after lymphangiogram (LAG) or staging laparotomy (SL) were randomized between prophylactic radiation to the pelvic lymph nodes and prostatic bed vs. prostatic bed alone. The outcome of both treatment arms, as well as a comparison of the LAG group, to that of the SL group, are updated., Methods and Materials: A total of 449 eligible males were entered into RTOG protocol 7706 between 1978 and 1983. Lymph node staging was mandatory but at the physician's discretion; 117 (26%) patients had SL, while 332 (74%) had LAG. Follow-up was a median of 12 years and a maximum of 16 years. For those randomized to receive prophylactic pelvic lymph nodal irradiation, 45 Gy of megavoltage RT was delivered via multiple portals in 4.5-5 weeks, while all patients received 65 Gy in 6.5-8 weeks to the prostatic bed., Results: There was no significant difference in survival whether treatment was administered to the prostate or prostate and pelvic lymph nodes. The SL group had greater 12-year survival than the LAG group (48% vs. 38%, p = 0.02). Disease-free survival was statistically significant, with 38% for the SL group vs. 26% for the LAG group (p = 0.003). Bone metastasis was less common in the SL group (14%) than the LAG group (27%) (p = 0.003)., Conclusion: At 12-year median follow-up, there still was no survival difference in those patients treated prophylactically to the pelvic nodes and prostatic bed vs. the prostatic bed alone. Those patients not surgically staged with only LAG for lymph node evaluation were less accurately staged, as reflected by a statistically significant reduced survival and earlier metastases.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of immediate androgen suppression in conjunction with standard external beam irradiation vs. radiation alone on a group of pathologically staged lymph node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate., Methods and Materials: A national prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-31) of standard external beam irradiation plus immediate androgen suppression vs. external beam irradiation alone was initiated in 1985 for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. One hundred seventy-three of the patients in this trial had biopsy-proven pathologically involved lymph nodes. Ninety-eight of these patients received radiation plus the immediate androgen suppression (LHRH agonist), while 75 received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation instituted at the time of relapse., Results: With a median followup of 4.9 years, estimated progression-free survival with PSA < 1.5 ng/ml at 5 years was 55% for the patients who received radiation plus immediate LHRH agonist vs. 11% of the patients who received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation at relapse (p = 0.0001). Because all of these patients had locally advanced disease (i.e., pathologically positive lymph nodes), stage does not explain this difference in outcome, and Gleason grade was not statistically different between the two groups. Estimated absolute survival at 5 years for the radiation and LHRH group was 73 vs. 65% for the radiation alone group who received androgen suppression at relapse. Estimated disease-specific survival at 5 years was 82% for the radiation and immediate LHRH agonist group and 77% for the radiation-alone group., Conclusion: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate and pathologically involved pelvic lymph nodes (pN+ or clinical stage D1) should be seriously considered for external beam irradiation plus immediate hormonal manipulation over radiation alone with hormonal manipulation at the time of relapse.

Purpose: Although androgen suppression results in a tumor response/remission in the majority of patients with carcinoma of the prostate, its potential value as an adjuvant has not been substantiated., Materials and Methods: In 1987, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) initiated a randomized phase III trial of adjuvant goserelin in definitively irradiated patients with carcinoma of the prostate. A total of 977 patients had been accessioned to the study. Of these, 945 remained analyzable: 477 on the adjuvant arm and 468 on the observation arm., Results: Actuarial projections show that at 5 years, 84% of patients on the adjuvant goserelin arm and 71% on the observation arm remain without evidence of local recurrence (P < .0001). The corresponding figures for freedom from distant metastases and disease-free survival are 83% versus 70% (P < .001) and 60% and 44% (P < .0001). If prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level greater than 1.5 ng is included as a failure (after > or = 1 year), the 5-year disease-free survival rate on the adjuvant goserelin arm is 53% versus 20% on the observation arm (P < .0001). The 5-year survival rate (for the entire population) is 75% on the adjuvant arm versus 71% on the observation arm (P = .52). However, in patients with centrally reviewed tumors with a Gleason score of 8 to 10, the difference in actuarial 5-year survival (66% on the adjuvant goserelin arm v 55% on the observation arm) reaches statistical significance (P = .03)., Conclusion: Application of androgen suppression as an adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy has been associated with a highly significant improvement in local control and freedom from disease progression. At this point, with a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, a significant improvement in survival has been observed only in patients with centrally reviewed tumors with a Gleason score of 8 to 10.

Background: The p53 tumor suppressor gene (also known as TP53) is one of the most frequently mutated genes in human cancer. Several studies have shown that p53 mutations are infrequent in prostate cancer and are associated with advanced disease., Purpose: We assessed the prognostic value of identifying abnormal p53 protein expression in the tumors of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer who were treated with either external-beam radiation therapy alone or total androgen blockade before and during the radiation therapy., Methods: The study population consisted of a subset of patients entered in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 8610 ("a phase III trial of Zoladex and flutamide used as cytoreductive agents in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy"). Immunohistochemical detection of abnormal p53 protein in pretreatment specimens (i.e., needle biopsies or transurethral resections) was achieved by use of the monoclonal anti-p53 antibody DO7; specimens in which 20% or more of the tumor cell nuclei showed positive immunoreactivity were considered to have abnormal p53 protein expression. Associations between p53 protein expression status and the time to local progression, the incidence of distant metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated in univariate (logrank test) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazards model) analyses. Reported P values are two-sided., Results: One hundred twenty-nine (27%) of the 471 patients entered in the trial had sufficient tumor material for analysis. Abnormal p53 protein expression was detected in the tumors of 23 (18%) of these 129 patients. Statistically significant associations were found between the presence of abnormal p53 protein expression and increased incidence of distant metastases (P = .04), decreased progression-free survival (P = .03), and decreased overall survival (P = .02); no association was found between abnormal p53 protein expression and the time to local progression (P = .58). These results were independent of the Gleason score and clinical stage. A significant treatment interaction was detected with respect to the development of distant metastases: Among patients receiving both radiation therapy and hormone therapy, those with tumors exhibiting abnormal p53 protein expression experienced a reduced time to the development of distant metastases (P = .001); for patients treated with radiation therapy alone, the time to distant metastases was unrelated to p53 protein expression status (P = .91)., Conclusions: Determination of p53 protein expression status yield significant, independent prognostic information concerning the development of distant metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer who are treated primarily with radiation therapy., Implications: The interaction of radiation therapy plus hormone therapy and abnormal p53 protein expression may provide a clinical link to experimental evidence that radiation therapy and/or hormone therapy act, at least in part, by the induction of apoptosis (a cell death program) and suggests that this mechanism may be blocked in patients whose tumors have p53 mutations.

Purpose: We have previously shown that the intensity (graded semiquantitatively as 1-4+) of tissue prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) staining determined immunocytochemically in a cohort of prostate carcinoma patients from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocols (RTOG) protocols 75-06 and 77-06 correlated with survival. The extent of this staining was heterogeneous and was estimated. The extent of staining was not found to be significantly associated with survival. We undertook the present quantitative study to see if the improved precision and reliability of measurement of the intensity and extent of prostate specific acid phosphatase staining would confirm and extend our previous observations., Methods and Materials: Patient cohorts representative of the entire group were obtained from RTOG 75-06 plus 77-06 and 83-07. The RTOG 77-06 plus 75-06 patients (No-Hormone population) did not receive preradiation hormonal therapy. RTOG 83-07 patients (Prehormone population) received one of two types of preradiation chemical androgen ablation. In this study, histologic slides of tumors were immunocytochemically stained for PSAP by the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) technique using diaminobenezidene (DAB) as a substrate and hematoxylin as a nuclear counterstain. The intensity and extent of immunocytochemical PSAP staining (IPSAP stain) was quantified using our dual wavelength and batch mode image process technique., Results: Our study of 151 cases confirmed that overall survival of patients in both populations was positively correlated with the intensity and extent of IPSAP stain. Results of the two studies were similar. The statistical significance of the relationship of both extent and intensity was greater in the cohort from protocol 83-07, which was the patient group receiving pretreatment with hormones. In a Cox multiple regression analysis including clinical stage, Gleason and M. D. Anderson grades, and the cohort of patients (Prehormone or No-Hormone group) as covariables, both the intensity and extent of the IPSAP stain significantly correlated with survival along with M. D. Anderson grade of the tumor., Conclusion: Quantitative image analysis of the IPSAP stain predicts survival in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy with and without prior hormonal therapy.

Purpose: RTOG 83-07 is a Phase II randomized protocol designed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of Megestrol vs. Diethylstilbestrol (DES) used as cytoreductive agents prior to and during radiotherapy. The end points of this study include tumor clearance rate, effect on serum testosterone, loco-regional control, disease-free interval, and survival., Methods and Materials: Eligible patients were those with histologically confirmed locally advanced adenocarcinoma, clinical Stage B2 (T2B) and C (T3) without regional lymph node involvement, or with lymph node involvement limited to the pelvis. Patients were stratified by clinical stage, histological grade, and nodal status, and were randomized to receive either Megestrol 40 mg three times per day by mouth, or Diethylstilbestrol 1 mg three times per day by mouth. The drugs were started 2 months prior to initiation of radiotherapy and were continued throughout the radiotherapy course. Radiotherapy consisted of 44-46 Gy, 1.8-2 Gy per day to the regional lymphatics, followed by a boost to the prostate consisting of 20-25 Gy, 1.8-2 Gy per day, to a total of 65-70 Gy. Serum testosterone levels were recorded throughout the treatment course. Tumor response was assessed clinically and radiographically (CT scan). From March 1983 through June 1986 a total of 203 patients were accessioned to the study; 198 were analyzable., Results: Correlation of the incidence of drug-related toxicity and treatment arm assignment revealed a significantly higher incidence of complications in the Diethylstilbestrol (DES) arm. The most prominent were the differences in the incidence of gynecomastia (55% vs. 7%) and fluid retention (21% vs. 6%). The incidence of thromboembolic phenomena was comparable (8% vs. 5% in the Megestrol arm). Patients on the DES arm demonstrated a significantly greater median decrease in testosterone level. Correlation of the treatment arm assignment and the rate of tumor regression and the incidence of complete response revealed no significant difference between the arms. At 7 years, 16% of patients on the Megace arm and 21% of patients on the DES arm manifested evidence of local failure., Conclusions: The results of the study indicate comparable efficacy (using tumor clearance as an end point) of DES and Megestrol. Although DES appears more effective in suppressing testosterone, it is also associated with a higher incidence of drug-related toxicity.

Objectives: Androgen deprivation therapy before and during radiation therapy could, by reducing tumor volume, increase local tumor control, disease-free survival, and overall survival in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the prostate., Methods: In a randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with large T2, T3, and T4 prostate tumors, but no evidence of osseous metastasis, were randomized to receive goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks and flutamide 250 mg orally three times daily 2 months before and during the radiation therapy course (Arm I) compared with radiation therapy alone (Arm II). Pelvic irradiation was administered with 1.8 to 2.0 Gy per day to a total dose of 45 +/- 1 Gy followed by a boost to the prostate target volume to a total dose of 65 to 70 Gy., Results: Of 471 randomized patients, 456 were evaluable, 226 on Arm I and 230 on Arm II. With a median potential follow-up of 4.5 years, the cumulative incidence of local progression at 5 years was 46% in Arm I and 71% in Arm II (P < 0.001). The 5-year incidence of distant metastasis on Arms I and II was 34% and 41%, respectively (P = 0.09). Progression-free survival rates including normal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels for 396 patients with at least one PSA recorded were 36% in Arm I and 15% in Arm II at 5 years (P < 0.001). At this time, no significant difference in overall survival could be detected (P = 0.7)., Conclusions: Short-term androgen deprivation with radiation therapy results in a marked increase in local control and disease-free survival compared with pelvic irradiation alone in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. Long-term surveillance is required to assess effects on overall survival.

Purpose: This study was done to correlate prostatic specific antigen values with clinical no evidence of disease status for 28 long-term survivors of external beam irradiation from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study #77-06, and confirm the clinical observation of cure., Methods and Materials: One hundred and four patients in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 77-06 with T1B T2 N0, M0 with pathologically known negative lymph node status, were previously shown to have a 10 year actuarial outcome equal to radical prostatectomy patients. Of these 104, 28 were 9-13 year survivors with clinically no evidence of disease by physical examination and imaging., Results: Prostatic specific antigen was available or obtained in 17 patients, 15 of the 17 had prostatic specific antigen values of < 3.5 ngm/%, while 11 had values of < 1.5 ngm/%. Depending on which level one selects, 88% or 65% of clinical no evidence of disease 9-13 year survivors have a normal or low prostatic specific antigen., Conclusion: Prostatic specific antigen adds to the accuracy of determining clinical long-term cure and shows that 65-88% of patients who are clinical no evidence of disease are "biochemical" cures as well. These correlation percentages are quite similar to the largest contemporary surgical series, and strongly support the concept and fact of cure of prostate cancer with radiation.

In this study, we quantitatively evaluated the intensity and extent of prostate-specific acid phosphatase in immunocytochemically stained prostate carcinoma tissue sections by using a dual-wave-length-based image processing technique. Tissue sections were doubly stained in a standard way, i.e., prostate-specific acid phosphatase was immunocytochemically labeled by peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) technique using diaminobenezidene (DAB) as the substrate and hematoxylin as a nuclear counterstain. Statistical analysis in this study indicated that the quantitative measures of the prostate-specific acid phosphatase staining (PAP-DAB) are reproducible. We found that the quantitative intensity was generally proportional to the subjective intensity (graded as 1 to 4+) of PAP-DAB. Although the quantitative extent measurements compared with the subjective estimates of the percentage of tumor showing staining with PAP-DAB had a similar tendency, there were significant overlaps between extent of tumor staining falling in the mid-ranges. Because subjective grading of immunocytochemical prostate-specific acid phosphatase has been thought to be a useful marker of tumor differentiation in patients with prostate carcinoma, we also evaluated the relationship of the quantitative measures of PAP-DAB staining to other predictors of patient outcome, including histologic grades (Gleason score and MD Anderson grading scheme) and clinical stage. We confirmed that quantitative intensity and extent of PAP-DAB staining were independent of histologic grades and stage, just as the subjective measures of intensity and extent were found to be. Possible explanations of this lack of correlation are discussed.

Purpose: This study was undertaken to show the long-term survival and probability of cure of prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiation in USA national surveys and in the prospective clinical trials of the RTOG., Methods and Materials: Two national patterns of care surveys of patients treated in 1973 and 1978 are reported along with two RTOG prospective trials (7506 and 7706). Hazard rates represent the risk of death and are compared to the rate expected for a normal population., Results: For patients with Stage A cancers, the survival is not different from the expected survival for any of the reported surveys. The hazard rate for death does not significantly exceed the expected hazard rate out to 15 years. For patients with Stage B cancer, there is a decrease in survival below expected and hazard rates show a continuing excess mortality as long as 15 years after treatment. For patients with Stage C cancers, there is a more rapid decrease in survival that then becomes parallel to the expected survival. Hazard rates indicate there has been a return to expected mortality at 15 years., Conclusion: These data make a strong argument for the long-term cure of prostate cancer by external beam radiation, and support the continued use and study of radiation therapy as a curative modality in prostate cancer. No similar national data is available for any other method of management.

A number of studies have identified race as a prognostic factor for survival from prostate cancer. To evaluate the prognostic significance of race in a controlled setting, we evaluated 1294 patients treated on three prospective randomized trials conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group between 1976 to 1985. One-hundred and twenty (9%) of the patients were coded as black, while 1077 (83%) of the patients were coded as white. Protocol 7506 included 607 patients with clinical Stage T3-T4Nx or T1b-T2N1-2. Protocol 7706 included 484 patients with clinical Stage T1b or T2 who were node negative. Protocol 8307 included 203 Stage T2b-T4 patients with no lymph node involvement beyond the pelvis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the possible independent significance of race and other prognostic factors, including Gleason score, serum acid phosphatase, nodal status, and hormonal status. Protocols 7706 and 8307 revealed that race was not of prognostic significance for disease-free or overall survival by either univariate or multivariate analysis. Univariate analysis of Protocol 7506 revealed that the median survival for blacks was somewhat shorter (5.4 years vs. 7.1 years, p = 0.02). This difference persisted after a multivariate analysis. A higher percentage of blacks treated on 7506 had an abnormally elevated serum acid phosphatase compared to whites (p = 0.006), and the time to distant failure tended to be shorter (p = 0.07). These findings suggest that blacks treated on 7506 may have had more extensive disease at presentation. Based on these prospective randomized trials, it is most likely that the lower survival noted for black Americans with prostate cancer reflects the tendency for blacks to present with more advanced disease. Differences in access to care, the quality of care received, and the impact of co-morbid conditions may explain the lower survival reported for black Americans elsewhere in the literature.

RTOG 77-06 and 75-06 were studies of nodal irradiation in prostate cancer, for which the status of nodes was determined by lymph node dissection (LND), lymphangiography (LAG), or computer assisted tomography (CT) based on investigator preference. Actuarial 5 year endpoints of survival, NED survival, local recurrence and distant metastasis have been determined by stage for 805 eligible patients with a comparison of pathologic vs clinical (imaging test) determined nodal status. Patients with pathologically negative lymph nodes show significantly improved 5 year survival (Stage T-2 (B) 84% vs 77%, Stage T-3,4 (C) 82% vs 65%) and NED survival (Stage T-2 (B) 72% vs 63%, Stage T-3,4 (C) 64% vs 44%) compared to patients clinically negative. Free of metastasis rates are increased in Stage T-3,4 (C) pathologic negative patients compared to imaging negative patients (75% vs 60%). A comparison of clinical positive versus clinical negative patients shows no difference in survival, NED survival or rate of metastasis, while a similar comparison of pathologic positive versus pathologic negative shows significant difference for all three endpoints (survival: Stage T-2 (B) 84% vs 61%, Stage T-3,4 (C) 82% vs 66%, NED survival: Stage T-2 (B) 72% vs 32%, Stage T-3,4 (C) 64% vs 32%; free of metastasis: Stage T-2 (B) 82% vs 64%, Stage T-3,4 (C) 75% vs 44%). The clinical determination of nodal status, therefore, has no prognostic value in contrast to pathologic determination and should not be used for stratifying patients in clinical trials. The CT scans often used to evaluate nodal status are more useful if delayed until they can be done as part of the treatment planning process where the CT has value. When imaging tests suggest positive lymph nodes in prostate cancer patients, the imaging finding is confirmed by biopsy.

From 1976 to 1983, 1091 patients were entered into RTOG protocols 75-06 and 77-06. Of these, 780 patients complied with protocol requirements, received a minimum tumor dose of greater than or equal to 6500 cGy, and received no endocrine therapy. There were 78, 342, and 360 patients with localized prostate carcinoma, Stages T1b(A2), T2(B), and T3,4(C), respectively. The potential follow-up period ranges from 6 years 5 months to 13 years 3 months, with a median follow-up of 9 years. This study examines the influence of overall treatment time on the outcome of definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma in this patient population. Within each stage, patients were divided into three groups according to the total number of elapsed days while on treatment: within 49 days (less than or equal to 7 weeks); 50 to 63 days (8 to 9 weeks); and greater than or equal to 64 days (greater than 9 weeks). Based on actuarial analysis, within each stage, the overall treatment time did not have any impact on the following: overall survival, NED survival, or local/regional control. When grouped under different histologic grades, that is, Gleason scores 2-5, 6-7, and 8-10, the actuarial local/regional control showed no statistical difference among the three groups. The actual local/regional failures were analyzed and stratified by stage and Gleason scores, and no statistical difference was noted among the three groups for each stratification. The range of local/regional failure rates among the three groups for T1b(A2), T2(B), and T3,4(C) disease were 0%-8%, 16%-23%, and 24%-27%, respectively. The corresponding range of local/regional failure rates for patients with Gleason scores of 2-5, 6-7, and 8-10 were 13%-14%, 18%-22%, and 22%-33%, respectively. The incidence of late complications was not related to the number of elapsed treatment days. Therefore, the overall treatment time does not have an impact on the outcome of definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma. It is hypothesized that prostate carcinoma behaves as late-reacting tissue in which there is little, if any, accelerated repopulation of clonogenic tumor cells during the later half of a protracted course of radiotherapy. This observation is in direct contrast to that suggested for head and neck carcinoma and bears important implications in daily radiotherapeutic management of patients with prostate carcinoma.

One hundred four patients with stage T-1b, T-2 N-O M-O prostate cancer were treated with external beam irradiation as part of RTOG 77-06. Lymph nodes were negative by lymph node dissection in 16 patients with T-1b and 88 patients with T-2 cancers. Survival exceeds age matched expected survival for the 10 years of observation (63% vs 59% at 10 years). Patterns of failure at 10 years show 87% of patients were free of isolated local recurrence, 79% free of metastatic failure, 67% free of any failure, and cause specific survival shows 86% free of cancer death at 10 years. The outcome of this group is equal or superior to reports of radical prostatectomy in similar stage patients.

Significant late intestinal and urinary morbidity from external beam irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate has been a constant concern of both the urologist and the radiation oncologist. We analyzed two large Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials (7506 and 7706) using primary irradiation in the treatment of local or locoregional adenocarcinoma of the prostate to assess morbidity via the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scoring scheme (grade 1-5). One thousand twenty patients were treated in total with a minimum follow-up of 7 years in the surviving patients. There was a 3.3% incidence of intestinal complications defined as grade 3 toxicity or more with .6% of patients experiencing bowel obstruction or perforation. Urinary complications defined as grade 3 toxicity or more were found in 7.7% of patients with only 0.5% experiencing morbidity that would require a major surgical intervention such as laparotomy, cystectomy, or prolonged hospitalization. Intestinal and urinary complications were evaluated in reference to several parameters that might have an impact on their incidence (i.e., previous laparotomy, stage of disease, hypertension, positive lymph nodes, previous transurethral resection, total dose, and energy of accelerator used). Only total dose (greater than 70 Gray) was found to have a significant impact on the incidence of the urinary complications. None of these factors had a significant impact on the incidence of intestinal complications. These data from two large multi-institutional trials represent a fair estimate of the actual incidence of major intestinal and urinary complications from external beam irradiation in the management of local and locoregional adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Since the incidence of these major complications remains very low, we believe that external beam irradiation remains an excellent alternative to radical prostatectomy in the management of these patients.

The role of three-dimensional (3-D) treatment planning for postoperative radiation therapy was evaluated for rectal carcinoma as part of an NCI contract awarded to four institutions. It was found that the most important contribution of 3-D planning for this site was the ability to plan and localize target and normal tissues at all levels of the treatment volume, rather than using the traditional method of planning with only a single central transverse slice and simulation films. There was also a slight additional improvement when there were no constraints on the types of plans (i.e., when noncoplanar beams were used). Inhomogeneity considerations were not important at this site under the conditions of planning, i.e., with energies greater than 4 MV and multiple fields. Higher beam energies (15-25 MV) were preferred by a small margin over lower energies (down to 4 MV). The beam's eye view and dose-volume histograms were found quite useful as planning tools, but it was clear that work should continue on better 3-D displays and improved means of translating such plans to the treatment area.

Over 300 treatment plans for a total of eight disease sites based on 3-D treatment planning considerations utilizing serial CT delineated target volumes were generated by four institutions as part of an NCI supported contract to both assess the current state-of-the-art capabilities and point directions for future efforts. Two patients with stage C prostate cancer were evaluated with protocol plans which required treatment of the prostate to 70 Gy and the pelvic lymph nodes to 46 Gy. When full 3-D target definition and multiple beam arrangements were employed, all institutions were able to submit plans which scored higher on tumor coverage and had lower normal tissue complication scores compared to traditional plans. The 3-D plans using standard beam arrangements, however, were often rated as highly as the 3-D unconstrained plans due to the multiple beam arrangements already selected to optimize standard plans at most institutions. For this site, heterogeneity corrections, beam energy changes and changes in CT number did not substantially change plan scores.

In patients with locally advanced (bulky) carcinoma of the prostate, definitive radiotherapy is associated with a high rate of local recurrence. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has conducted several studies evaluating hormonal cytoreduction (used as an induction regimen) as a means of improving the local control rate. RTOG 85-19 tested an induction regimen consisting of a depot LH-RH agonist (Zoladex) and an antiandrogen (flutamide). Eligible patients were those with bulky primary lesions (stage B2 and C) with disease confined to the pelvis. Zoladex was administered every 29 days via a subcutaneous injection. Flutamide was given by mouth in a dose of 250 mg t.i.d. Administration of the drugs was initiated 2 months prior to start of radiotherapy and was terminated at completion of the radiotherapy course. Radiotherapy consisted of 180-200 rad/day, 4,400-4,500 rad to the regional lymphatics, and 6,500-7,000 rad to the prostate. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of the combined (hormonal cytoreduction plus definitive radiotherapy) regimen. Thirty-one patients were accessioned; 30 are analyzable. The drug-related toxicity appears acceptable. It included appearance of diarrhea before initiation of radiotherapy in two patients, nausea during the 2nd week of drug administration in two patients, and skin rash in three patients. These phenomena appear to be related to flutamide. Hot flashes were recorded in 17 patients. With a minimum follow-up of 2 years, clearance of the primary lesions (by clinical examination) was documented in 28 of 30 patients. During the 1st year, two of 30 patients died (of unrelated causes) with residual palpable tumors. The observed toxicity appears acceptable and the response rate encouraging. A phase III study comparing the tested regimen against radiotherapy alone appears warranted.

From 1966 to 1983, 50 patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas were treated with wide local excision and postoperative radiotherapy at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology. The median follow-up was 70 months (range 28 to 168). Grade was the most significant factor affecting survival: all 11 patients with well differentiated tumor survived versus 6/8 patients with moderate and 17/31 patients with poorly differentiated tumors (p less than 0.01). In addition, lymph node involvement at diagnosis conferred a worse prognosis with only 2/5 patients alive after treatment (p less than 0.05). Eleven of 50 (22%) failed locally. Factors affecting local control included gross residual tumor after operation and limited treatment volume. Among the 35 patients who did not have gross residual tumor or limited treatment volume, two patients who received less than 5000 cGy failed locally versus 1/18 patients who received between 5000-6000 cGy and 2/15 patients who received more than 6000 cGy. Microscopically positive margins and a volume encompassing less than the total muscular compartment was not associated with an increase in the incidence of local failure. Eight patients developed local complication: five due to retreatment for local recurrence. Overall, 24/26 patients who are alive have had their limbs preserved with normal function.

This is a report of a phase I/II study of 13 patients treated with sodium pentosanpolysulfate (PPS) for chronic radiation-induced proctitis. A complete response was obtained in 82%, a partial response occurred in 9%, and 9% failed to respond to therapy. No significant toxicity was observed. It is concluded that PPS is an effective treatment for chronic radiation-induced proctitis and a phase III randomized, double-blind study of PPS versus placebo is planned.

The incidence, severity, time of onset, and clinical course of complications of treatment have been reviewed in the RTOG studies of extended field irradiation in carcinoma of the prostate. A total of 526 patients, entered between 1976 and 1980 and followed for a minimum of 18 months, comprised the study population. In most instances of treatment-related morbidity, the symptoms were recorded during the first several months to 1 year following completion of treatment. Late occurrences, however, were not uncommon in certain types of radiation-produced injuries, such as proctitis, hematuria, and urethral strictures. Resolution of symptoms has been observed in a large proportion of patients including those with late occurrences of treatment-related morbidity, although the probability and the pattern of resolution differed considerably from one type of morbidity to another. Symptoms of cystitis are more likely to abate than those of proctitis. In patients who develop symptoms of proctitis the probability of persistence of symptoms beyond the second year following occurrence has been estimated at 20%-30%. Hematuria and symptoms secondary to urethral strictures seem to be even more likely to recur or persist, while genital and leg edema remain chronic in the majority of patients.