Search

We describe the case of a male patient, aged 50, affected by an undifferentiated cancer of the gastric stump of a Billroth II gastric resection associated with a well-differentiated squamous-cell cancer of the oesophagus. The patient was submitted to gastrectomy and removal of the oesophagus together with reconstruction trough colon interposition. The association of the two synchronous neoplasms of the stomach and oesophagus is a very uncommon event, as the evidence in the medical literature demonstrates. Nevertheless, for the purposes of achieving in the right surgical planning, it is important to take this possibility into consideration in the preoperative management of oesophageal cancer, through the study of the organs which could be used to reconstruct the transit (stomach, colon). The association with a gastric neoplasm implies the use of the other organs (colon, ileum). However, for a number of selected cases of association with early gastric cancer, Japanese authors have suggested using the stomach in place of the oesophagus.

Therapeutic options for management of blunt hepatic trauma include both non-operative and operative management, until liver transplantation. The presence of associated intraabdominal lesions increases mobility and mortality. A total of 58 patients with blunt hepatic injury, observed at the 2nd Surgical Unit of the "Santa Chiara Hospital" of Trento over a four-year period (1999-2003), were analyzed. Thirty-eight patients (65.5%) were treated conservatively with a 94.7% success rate. Twenty (34.5%) patients were surgically treated. Suture hepatorraphy was the most common procedure performed. The overall morbidity in surgical patients was 25%, with 20% of liver related complications. Four patients (20%) died with a liver related mortality of 10%. Advantages of non-operative management included a reduced need for transfusion (1.1 vs. 4.3 U), with 81.5% of patients not requiring transfusion, a reduced stay in the ICU and a reduced rate of morbidity and mortality (2.6% vs. 20%). Hemodynamic instability and the presence of an associated lesion in blunt hepatic trauma patients require emergency laparotomy. The widespread application of non-operative management has reduced the rate of morbidity and mortality related to unnecessary surgical approaches.

The natural history of diverticulosis is worthy of note for its acute, sometimes recurrent, attacks of diverticulitis and the significant risk of serious complications, such as abscess, fistula and peritonitis. Most mild attacks of diverticulitis respond well to medical therapy while surgical treatment is indicated in the complicated forms of the disease. We evaluate the results of treatment of complicated acute diverticulitis by laparoscopic colorrhaphy, irrigation and drainage as a minimal surgical approach in 7 selected patients. We retrospectively analyzed all patients admitted to our institute for acute diverticulitis from 1996 to 2001. One hundred and thirty-five patients were admitted for acute sigmoid diverticulitis. Ninety-eight patients (72%) had their diverticular disease completely resolved after medical therapy, while 37 (28%) required a surgical approach. Seven patients underwent a laparoscopic colorrhaphy with irrigation and drainage. Laparoscopic procedures were completed in 6 patients. No perioperative morbidity or mortality was observed. All patients were discharged with no further re-operation. The technique could be considered a valid alternative for the management of complicated and perforated diverticulitis in selected patients.

Renal allograft rupture is a rare but potentially lethal complication of kidney transplantation. A renal allograft recipient receiving quadruple immunosuppressive therapy developed a spontaneous allograft rupture 13 days after kidney transplantation. Warm ischaemia time during the transplant was 80 minutes. The ruptured kidney graft could not be salvaged because of the patient's haemodynamic instability. The histopathological examination showed interstitial oedema with severe acute tubular necrosis with no signs of acute rejection. The most common causes of renal graft rupture are acute rejection and vein thrombosis, while acute tubular necrosis may only rarely be responsible for this complication. Renal graft rupture may be the result of interstitial damage attributed both to the prolonged warm ischaemia time during the transplant and to post-transplant acute tubular necrosis in the absence of graft rejection. In those patients whose haemodynamic status cannot be stabilized by appropriate aggressive haemodynamic support therapy, graft nephrectomy should be considered the only definitive treatment.