Search

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the gold standard after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Because local and systemic ischemic complications can occur particularly in the early phase (i.e. 1-3 months) after ACS or PCI, the synergistic platelet inhibition of aspirin and a P2Y

Bicruciate-retaining (BCR) prostheses may improve satisfaction of patient undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to assess whether BCR prostheses provide better clinical outcomes than posterior-stabilized (PS) prostheses.This is a randomized single-blind control trial involving a total of 77 patients with knee osteoarthritis, randomly assigned to undergo TKA with a BCR or PS implant between 2015 and 2019. Mean follow-up period was 39 months. Clinical and demographic data were extracted manually from medical records. Data acquisition included patient demographics, knee range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes via KSS, KOOS, WOMAC, and SF-12 scores.A total of 38 patients were randomized to the PS group and 39 to the BCR group. At the 5-year follow-up, no statistical differences were noted for knee range of motion or patient-reported outcomes between the two groups, except for a greater knee flexion in the early follow-up period in the PS group. Five adverse events occurred in the BCR group compared to none in the PS group (p = 0.02).BCR TKA yield similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes 5 years following the intervention compared with PS TKA. The BCR TKA had more complications.I (Randomized Controlled Trial).

Aims The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has released three consecutive guidelines within 5 years addressing cardiovascular prevention, risk scores, and cholesterol treatment. This study aims to evaluate whether the 2021 ESC guidelines improved the eligibility of individuals for primary prevention statin therapy before their first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and for intensive lipid-lowering treatments in secondary prevention. Methods and results The cardiovascular risk category of 2757 consecutive individuals admitted for a first STEMI was evaluated to assess whether they would have been eligible for primary prevention statins according to 2021 vs. 2019 and 2016 ESC guidelines. Eligibility for intensive lipid-lowering therapy in secondary prevention was assessed according to the real-life follow-up low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the expected follow-up LDL-C. More individuals would have been eligible for primary prevention statins according to 2021 and 2019 vs. 2016 guidelines (61.8% vs. 38.7% vs. 23.6%, P Conclusion The 2021 ESC guidelines improved the detection and treatment of individuals at risk for a first myocardial infarction. In secondary prevention, 70% of patients kept LDL-C levels above 55 mg/dL: increasing the statin dose and adding ezetimibe were the most frequently recommended therapeutic actions.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) were individually proven to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, but the relative magnitude of benefits from these two drug classes is debated. We aimed to review current available data on GLP1-RA and SGLT2i in T2DM patients and compare their efficacy and safety in this population.We systematically searched MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Embase, www.tctmd.com, www.clinicaltrials.gov, www.clinicaltrialresults.org, from inception to September 17, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of GLP1-RA vs SGLT2i vs optimal medical therapy (OMT) in adult T2DM patients. Three authors independently screened references and extracted data using a predefined data collection form. Outcomes were analyzed using an indirect comparison meta-analysis of aggregate study-level data. The primary combined efficacy outcome comprised cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke. Secondary efficacy outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, heart failure hospitalizations (HFH), and worsening renal function (WRF).11 RCTs enrolling a total of 98572 patients were included; 56004 (57%) patients were derived from GLP1-RA RCTs and 42568 (43%) from SGLT2i RCTs. At a median follow-up of 3.0±1.3 years, compared with OMT, both GLP1-RA and SGLT2i similarly reduced the rate of the composite primary outcome (risk ratio [RR] 0.88; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.83-0.93 and RR 0.88, 95%CI 0.82-0.95, respectively) with no difference between the drug classes (RR 1.00, 95%CI 0.92-1.10). Both classes similarly reduced MI rate, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared with OMT; stroke reduction was only observed with GLP1-RA with no difference in the indirect comparison with SGLT2i; conversely, only SGLT2i were effective in preventing HFH. Both GLP1-RA and SGLT2i were protective against WRF, with a major efficacy of SGLT2i in the indirect comparison.This meta-analysis report that GLP1-RA and SGLT2i reduced with a similar efficacy not only MACE as MI, but also cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality at a median 3 years follow-up. SGLT2i were more protective in HFH and WRF than GLP1RA. These new data highlight the efficacy of SGLT2i not only in HF and chronic kidney disease (CKD) but also in ischemic heart diseases (IHD), with a homogeneity among the class, whereas the results observed with GLP1-RA are heterogenous. These findings will help clinical's decisions to optimize therapeutic strategies for diabetic patients.

Aims The relative safety and efficacy of de-escalation, extended duration (ED) (>12-months), and standard dual antiplatelet therapy for 12-months (DAPT-12) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. Methods and results Online databases were queried to identify relevant randomized control trials (RCTs). ED-DAPT, high-potency (HP) DAPT, shorter duration (SD) DAPT, and low-dose (LD) DAPT were compared with DAPT-12. A trial sequential, bivariate, influential, and frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to determine the pooled estimates. A total of 30 RCTs comprising 81 208 (40 839 experimental, 40 369 control arm) patients with CAD were included in the quantitative analysis. On NMA, compared with DAPT-12, all types of de-escalation, HP-DAPT-12, and ED-DAPT strategies had a statistically non-significant difference in the incidence of MACE at a median follow-up of 1-year. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the incidence of stroke, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and all-cause mortality between DAPT-12 and all other strategies. The network estimates showed a significantly lower incidence of major bleeding with DAPT for 3-months followed by P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45–0.84), while a higher risk of bleeding with HP-DAPT for 12 months (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.16–2.06). The net clinical benefit and rankograms also favoured DAPT-3 (P2Y12) and discouraged the use of HP-DAPT-12 and ED-DAPT. A subgroup analysis of 19 RCTs restricted to patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) mirrored the findings of pooled analysis. A sensitivity analysis revealed no influence of any individual study or individual strategy on net ischemic estimates. The trial sequential analysis (TSA) illustrated a consistently non-significant difference at the interim analysis of trials, reaching the futility area for MACE, while the cumulative Z-values line surpassed the monitoring boundary as well as the required information size for major bleeding favouring de-escalation strategy. Conclusion DAPT for three months followed by ticagrelor-only and use of aspirin + clopidogrel after a short period of high potency DAPT appears to be a safe strategy for treating post-PCI patients. However, given the methodological limitations and inclusion of a small number of trials in novel de-escalation strategies, these findings need validation by future large scale RCTs.

The management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is complex, especially after they have been discharged from hospital after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), because each patient may have numerous healthcare providers, and follow-up after discharge may be disjointed, or even incomplete. During follow-up after ACS, few patients have treatment intensification; rather, there is actually a major tendency towards reductions in treatment intensity, to the potential detriment of outcomes. We present here guidance from a French expert panel for the optimal management of lipid-lowering therapy up to 1 year after ACS.A French expert panel provides a practical guide for the implementation of guidelines for the management of post-ACS patients in routine practice, from hospital discharge up to one year after the index event, focusing in particular on the achievement of target LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. We discuss the early follow-up (up to 6 months after discharge), and review the lipid-lowering treatment strategies that should be implemented. We discuss the evidence underpinning the prescription of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors as well as recent evidence about icosapent ethyl. This review should facilitate implementation of a clear and effective lipid-lowering strategy for all patients after ACS.The panel recommends early use of high-intensity statins, in combination with ezetimibe for patients with LDL-c above 100 mg/dL at baseline. PCSK9i should be rapidly added during the first 3 months in high-risk diabetic patients with residual LDL-C above 70 mg/dL (with further benefit for those with residual LDL-C above ≥100 mg/dL) despite maximal tolerated dose statin and ezetimibe, patients with recent ACS, and patients with recurrent ischemic events under optimal medical therapy, multivessel coronary disease (MVD) and/or polyvascular disease (PVD), especially symptomatic PAD diabetic patients. Concerning Icosapent Ethyl (EPA), this drug should be introduced in patients ≥45 years of age with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or already on high-intensity or maximally tolerated statin therapy or with fasting triglycerides 135-499 mg/dL (with or without ezetimibe).Lipid-lowering treatment should be introduced as early as possible to obtain a rapid and profound decrease of LDL-c from baseline, using high-intensity statins (atorvastatin or rosuvastatin) and ezetimibe in fixed combination before discharge. Then, the strategy should be rapidly intensified by adding a PCSK9 inhibitor if the patient does not reach LDL-c levels below 55 mg/dL. We advocate this intensive strategy, which has demonstrated a further reduction in ischemic events, without safety concerns, even for patients who reach very low LDL-cholesterol levels. This approach, comprising few therapeutic steps, aims to rapidly reach LDL-c goals, improve patient compliance, and is an efficient method to fight therapeutic inertia, which remains a major issue.

The continuous progress in cardiovascular (CV) risk prevention strategies has led to an impressive reduction in mortality and recurrent ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the control of several CV risk factors remains suboptimal in many CAD patients, with a high rate of recurrent events, underlying the need for more new prevention strategies. The GAPS-I (GLP1 analogues, Antithrombotic agents, PCSK9 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors and Immunomodulators) strategy offers a promising potential in patients with a high-residual CV risk, who are frequently encountered in daily practice, by offering an individualised and structured approach to addressing their individual risk factors. The current review summarises the evidence to date on each of its components, with respect to clinical outcomes and economic feasibility. The current evidence points to an efficacy of GAPS-I in reducing MACE and mortality, without a compromise on safety, albeit with the need for longer follow-up data. Key Points: - Secondary prevention remains suboptimal in many CAD patients, highlighting the need for innovative prevention strategies. - The present review discusses the current evidence on efficacy of the GAPS-I strategy in reducing MACE and mortality in patients with CAD. - The GAPS-I strategy, if widely adopted, provides a promising potential to assist cardiologists in managing patients at a heightened risk for further CV events.

Physical activity (PA) is an established modifiable factor for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Our objective was to assess the association of PA with mortality rates in a national sample of patients with diabetes.We analyzed a nationally representative sample from The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, periods 2003-2004 and 2005-2006) that used Physical Activity Monitors. Individuals were matched for BMI, number of steps/ per day and age. Three groups were created: subjects with less than 5000/steps per day (low), 5000-7500/steps per day (moderate) and more than 7500/steps per day (high levels of physical activity). All-cause mortality was ascertained through December 2015.A sample of 3,072 individuals (1018 with diabetes) was analyzed. Patients with diabetes had 30% increased risk of mortality of all causes (RR: 1,298, 95% CI [1,162-1,451], p0,001), Higher levels of physical activity (7500 steps/day) provided similar relative risk for subjects with diabetes compared to their controls [RR:1,256 (95% CI 0,910-1,732)]. In a Poisson model adjusted for sex, history of previous cardiovascular event or cancer, ethnicity, Hb1ac, SBP, and total cholesterol to HDL ratio, patients with diabetes and moderate or high PA had an associated 44% to 80% lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to those with low PA.The subgroup of patients with diabetes and high PA had no excess of mortality compared to the general population. PA can reduce the gap for all-cause mortality, used as an index of cardiovascular fitness and a clinical tool for the assessment of mortality risk.

Although some observational studies suggest a potential association of low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), these analyses have issues of confounding where other factors (e.g. older age, frailty) that likely explain the findings, and the number of events was very low. More recent results from randomized clinical trials have not found an increased risk in ICH, most notably trials using PCSK9 inhibitors that achieve very low levels of LDL-C, but also in the long-term follow-up of the IMPROVE-IT trial. Also, other statin-associated safety issues, including new onset diabetes and the cancer risk should not be the reason of statin discontinuation, especially for the former, the benefits highly outweigh the risk (even 5×), and for the latter, there is no confirmed link suggesting any increased risk, in opposite, data exist suggesting benefits of statin therapy in cancer prevention. Furthermore, use of intensive lipid-lowering strategies with statins and non-statin drugs leads to decrease of ischaemic major adverse cardiac events, without safety concern, in a large population of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). These data should promote the concept ‘the earlier, the lower, the longer, the better’ for the lipid management of patients with ASCVD. While few uncertainties remain in several populations that have been underrepresented in clinical trials (African American and Asian patients, low weight individuals), the most recent data with intensive LDL-C lowering with PCSK9 inhibitors are reassuring that the benefit outweighs any possible risk.

In the 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines on non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), the experts proposed to put an end to the equipoise of ticagrelor and prasugrel in addition to aspirin in patients with NSTE-ACS who proceed to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). They gave a strong level of recommendation (IIa) in favor of prasugrel over ticagrelor in these patients. We challenge this proposition, which was mainly driven by the results of ISAR-REACT 5, an open-label prospective head-to-head study of a prasugrel-based strategy compared with a ticagrelor-based strategy in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. In addition to the methodological concerns regarding the ISAR-REACT 5 study, we also question this decision in light of the ISAR-REACT 5 diabetes mellitus subgroup analysis and previous studies and meta-analysis that showed no difference between ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ACS. Although we agree with the "one size does not fit all" concept for antiplatelet regimens in patients with ACS who proceed to PCI, we believe that the decision to strongly favor prasugrel was premature and not supported enough by the ISAR-REACT 5 results. In our opinion, equipoise remains between the ticagrelor- and prasugrel-based strategies and more data are needed to settle the debate.

In patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction, the communication and transition from specialists to primary care physicians is often delayed, and the information imparted to subsequent healthcare providers (HCPs) may be sub-optimal. A French group of cardiologists, lipidologists and diabetologists decided to establish a consensus to optimize the discharge letter after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction. The aim is to improve both the timeframe and the quality of the content transmitted to subsequent HCPs, including information regarding baseline assessment, procedures during hospitalization, residual risk, discharge treatments, therapeutic targets and follow-up recommendations in compliance with European Society of Cardiology guidelines. A consensus was obtained regarding a template discharge letter, to be released within two days after patient’s discharge, and containing the description of the patient’s history, risk factors, acute management, risk assessment, discharge treatments and follow-up pathway. Specifically for post acute MI patients, tailored details are necessary regarding the antithrombotic regimen, lipid-lowering and anti-diabetic treatments, including therapeutic targets. Lastly, the follow-up pathway needs to be precisely mentioned in the discharge letter. Additional information such as technical descriptions, imaging, and quality indicators may be provided separately. A template for a standardized discharge letter based on 8 major headings could be useful for implementation in routine practice and help to improve the quality and timing of information transmission between HCPs after acute MI.

Objective Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease of multiple phenotypes of which a chronic pain phenotype (PP) is known. Previous PP studies have focused on one domain of pain and included heterogenous variables. We sought to identify multidimensional PPs using the IMMPACT recommendations and their relationship to clinical outcomes. Methods Participants >40 years of age with knee OA having a first-time orthopedic consultation at five university affiliated hospitals in Montreal, Quebec, and Hamilton (Canada) were recruited. Latent profile analysis was used to determine PPs (classes) using variables recommended by IMMPACT. This included pain variability, intensity and qualities, somatization, anxiodepressive symptoms, sleep, fatigue, pain catastrophizing, neuropathic pain, and quantitative sensory tests. We used MANOVA and χ2 tests to assess differences in participant characteristics across the classes and linear and Poisson regression to evaluate the association of classes to outcomes of physical performance tests, self-reported function and provincial healthcare data. Results In total, 343 participants were included (mean age 64 years, 64% female). Three classes were identified with increasing pain burden (class3 > class1), characterized by significant differences across most self-report measures and temporal summation, and differed in terms of female sex, younger age, lower optimism and pain self-efficacy. Participants in class2 and class3 had significantly worse self-reported function, stair climb and 40 m walk tests, and higher rates of healthcare usage compared to those in class1. Conclusions Three distinct PPs guided by IMMPACT recommendations were identified, predominated by self-report measures and temporal summation. Using this standardized approach may improve PP study variability and comparison.

International audience; Despite major advances in cardiovascular research over the past decade, women with type 2 diabetes have a high risk of cardiovascular events. Several factors contribute to the poor prognosis for women, including higher levels of frailty and comorbidities, but their cardiovascular risk is underestimated and there is suboptimal implementation and uptitration of new evidence-based therapies, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Recent studies highlight the need for better management of diabetes in women that can be pursued and achieved in light of recent results from randomised controlled trials demonstrating evidence of the benefits of new therapeutic strategies in improving cardiovascular outcomes and quality of life of women covering the entire cardiovascular continuum. This review critically discusses the multiple benefits for women of new pharmacological treatments, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sodium–glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, inclisiran, icosapent ethyl and bempedoic acid in preventing cardiovascular events, and treatments, such as angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, SGLT2i, vericiguat and omecamtiv mecarbil, for preventing heart failure.

ObjectiveTo determine if the changes in the European Society Cardiology/European Atherosclerotic Society (ESC/EAS) guidelines improved the identification for primary prevention therapy in young adults at risk of a premature myocardial infarction.MethodsPatients admitted for a first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the ePARIS registry (n=2757) between 2010 and 2018 were classified by age: 65 years old. Using Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation 2, we evaluated whether patients would have been detected and treated with primary prevention statins before their first STEMI based on the 2021 EAS/ESC guidelines versus 2019 and 2016 guidelines. Eligibility for intensive proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9i) in secondary prevention was also assessed.ResultsFollowing 2021 ESC guidelines, 62.5% of individuals aged 65 years old (19% and 72%), p65 years.ConclusionsThe 2021 ESC guidelines allowed a much better detection of young individuals before their first STEMI than prior ESC guidelines. In secondary prevention, most of young individuals did not reach low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels recommended, but only one quarter would be eligible for PCSK9i.

Heart failure (HF) has high event rates, mortality, and is challenging to manage in clinical practice. Clinical management is complicated by complex therapeutic strategies in a population with a high prevalence of comorbidity and general frailty. In the last four years, an abundance of research has become available to support multidisciplinary management of heart failure from within the hospital through to discharge and primary care as well as supporting diagnosis and comorbidity management. Within the hospital setting, recent evidence supports sacubitril-valsartan combination in frail, deteriorating or de novo patients with LVEF ≤ 40%. Furthermore, new strategies such as SGLT2 inhibitors and vericiguat provide further benefit for patients with decompensating HF. Studies with tafamidis report major clinical benefits specifically for patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, a remaining underdiagnosed and undertreated disease. New evidence for medical interventions supports his bundle pacing to reduce QRS width and improve haemodynamics as well as ICD defibrillation for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. The Mitraclip reduces hospitalisations and mortality in patients with symptomatic, secondary mitral regurgitation and ablation reduces mortality and hospitalisations in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. In end-stage HF, the 2018 French Heart Allocation policy should improve access to heart transplants for stable, ambulatory patients and, mechanical circulatory support should be considered to avoid deteriorating on the waiting list. In the community, new evidence supports that improving discharge education, treatment and patient support improves outcomes. The authors believe that this review fills the gap between the guidelines and clinical practice and provides practical recommendations to improve HF management.

International audience

Introduction: Advanced heart failure (AdvHF) in HCM was overlooked. Hypothesis: Based on a systematic revision, we described prevalence & outcomes of the main HCM phenotypes responsible for AdvHF, heart transplantation (HTx), LVAD implantation & HF-death. Methods: We classified the HCM profiles responsible for AdvHF in 1) End-stage HCM (ES-HCM) defined by an LVEF≤50%; 2) LVOTO despite optimal medical therapy (OMT) (Refractory HOCM); 3) Nonobstructive HCM with preserved EF (HNOCMpEF). The study screened 130 manuscripts in MEDLINE and EMBASE on AdvHF in HCM patients (pts) published from 2000 till January 2020, in adults. 8 manuscripts were eligible for the analysis. AdvHF was defined by the presence of severe NYHA symptoms (III & IV) because in all the manuscripts this definition was used. Mean follow-up = 7.6 years. Results: Figure 1: Prevalence of phenotypes responsible for AdvHF&HTx/LVAD implantation/HF-Death. Of 205 HCM pts, 119 (58%) underwent HTx, LVAD implantation, or died for HF. Figure 2: Outcome per each clinical phenotype. Conclusions: AdvHF in HCM has an ominous prognosis (58% of pts met HTx/LVAD implantation/HF-death) but with significant differences among the 3 phenotypes. HOCM has a very good outcome, indeed only few cases developed a Refractory HOCM & AdvHF & only 1 died for HF. 29.7% of AdvHF were caused by HNOCMpEF due to massive hypertrophy & restrictive physiology & only 16.4% of them died due to HF. ES-HCM represents the main cause of AdvHF in HCM & the major determinant for poor outcomes among all HCM pts (Only 1/3 of them were event-free). This reflects poor attention and portrays an unmet need for ES-HCM pts. Recently it was demonstrated that an extensive amount of myocardial fibrosis (MF) is the major determinant for ES-evolution. Taken together these findings show the importance of a strict follow-up for HCM pts to timely identify ES-HCM & early start HF OMT. Developing specific therapies to lower the burden of MF & stop adverse remodeling it's crucial.

In 2019, the European Society of Cardiology and European Atherosclerosis Society released a new guideline document with substantial changes regarding the assessment of cardiovascular risk and treatments. The update of high-risk criteria and categories led to a better detection and primary prevention of patients at risk of a first cardiovascular event. Nonetheless, additional efforts are needed for a better inclusion of risk modifiers, especially specific to women, to improve risk stratification and direct primary prevention. Eventually, we discuss how these new guidelines implement PCSK9 inhibitors for very high-risk individuals and the evidence supporting new low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals below, such as 55 and 40 mg/dL.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) portends high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) events and of CV mortality; moreover, this group of patients has a very high probability of developing heart failure (HF). In this review, we discuss new advances in pharmacological treatment both in CV prevention and in HF management with a special focus on T2DM patients. A large number of randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses provided strong evidence about therapeutic strategies acting on glucose metabolism, such as GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i and about lipid-lowering treatment, such as PCSK9i and icosapent ethyl. Moreover, SGLT2i demonstrated strong evidence of benefit particularly in HF management both in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. The pathophysiological bases of multiple mechanisms of benefit of this class of drug explain the unexpected and remarkable results demonstrated both by prevention trials and by trials dedicated only to HF (like DAPA-HF). These, new drugs in the CV therapeutic armamentarium are establishing a new comprehensive approach from prevention to therapy of HF, giving more emphasis on HF classification in four stages (A→D). New therapies, which are on the horizon, promise to further reduce CV mortality and morbidity in HF patients irrespective of diabetic status.

International audience; Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) presenting with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing coronary stenting are indicated to treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combining aspirin with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. The management of patients with CAD who present with a complex clinical profile due to multiple comorbidities, and/or undergoing complex interventional procedures, remains challenging as a high risk for both ischemic and bleeding events is often present; hence, the risk-benefit balance on the optimal DAPT duration is difficult to evaluate. The complexity of antiplatelet therapy in CAD patients is due to the fact that this complexity embraces several aspects: the coronary anatomy, the number of vascular districts at risk for atherothrombosis, and patient comorbidities, including global frailty. Recent randomized and epidemiological studies have highlighted subgroups that could benefit from prolonged antithrombotic treatment, as well as frail patients, who may be better suited to a shorter course of therapy. We provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding treatment with DAPT, along with suggestions on its management.

Prasugrel and ticagrelor are preferred over clopidogrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to determine the relative merits of 1 agent over the other. Multiple databases were queried to identify relevant randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies. Random-effects model was used to calculate an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for major adverse cardiovascular and cerbrovascular events (MACCE) and its components. A total of 27 (7 RCTs, 20 observational cohort studies) studies comprising 118,266 (prasugrel 62,716, ticagrelor 51,196) patients were included. At 30 days, prasugrel was associated with a significantly lower odds of MACCE (OR 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 0.85, p ≤0.0001) and mortality (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.71, p ≤0.0001). At 1 year, the overall odds of mortality favored prasugrel (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.92, p = 0.002), but no significant interdrug difference was seen in terms of MACCE (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.05, p = 0.16). There was no significant difference in the odds of overall myocardial infarction, revascularization, stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding events between the 2 groups on both 30-day and 1-year follow-up. A subgroup analysis of RCTs data showed no significant difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor in terms of any end point at all time points. In conclusion, prasugrel might have lower odds of MACCE and mortality at 30 days. However, there was no difference in the safety and efficacy end points of 2 drugs at 1 year. The observed transient prasugrel-related mortality benefits were subject to the bias of nonrandomized assignment.

International audience; Purpose of ReviewThere has been significant progress made during the last few decades in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite this, residual risk remains an unmet need for secondary prevention and high-risk primary prevention patients. First onset and recurrent cardiovascular events remain a major issue despite recommendations for a healthy lifestyle and current optimal medical therapy, which includes the use of maximally tolerated statin therapy plus or minus add-on ezetimibe therapy.Recent FindingsThese findings have led to the development of new treatments that modulate lipid targets in order to improve prognosis of these patients at highest ASCVD risk. These include inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (evolocumab and alirocumab), an inhibitor of adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase (bempedoic acid), and a high-dose omega-3 formulation (icosapent ethyl), which have been evaluated in large phase III randomized clinical trials and/or currently undergoing continued study. The clinical efficacy of these drugs and their application in cardiovascular prevention are discussed in this review article. Of note, there are other novel lipid-lowering therapeutics with potential cardiovascular benefit, not discussed in this review, that include inhibitors of lipoprotein (a), apolipoprotein CIII, and angiopoietin-like 3. These drugs may also play a future role in reducing residual lipid-mediated ASCVD risk, if efficacy and safety confirmed in cardiovascular outcome trials.SummaryIn this review, we provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding treatment with several new lipid strategies for high-risk patients, along with suggestions on their use in ASCVD prevention management.