Search

Objective: To compare vascular complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO) using ultrasound guidance (USG) versus fluoroscopy guidance (FSG) for femoral access.Background: In patients undergoing PCI, using the arterial femoral access increases the risk of vascular complications compared using the radial access. USG reduces time to access, number of attempts, and vascular complications compared with FSG, but the efficacy of USG has never been tested in the setting of CTO-PCI.Methods: A total of 197 patients undergoing CTO-PCI using at least a femoral vascular access from November 2015 to September 2020 were screened. The primary outcome was a composite of local hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, retroperitoneal hemorrhage, arteriovenous fistula or hemoglobin drop ≥3 g/dL during hospitalization. The independent association between USG and the primary outcome of interest was explored.Results: The primary outcome occurred in 17.3% of patients. Patients in the USG group had a significantly lower incidence of vascular complications compared with patients in the FSG group (8.5% vs. 21.0%, p = 0.039), driven by a reduction of localized hematomas (3.4% vs 13.0%, p = 0.042). After adjustment for type of CTO approach and heparin dose, USG was significantly associated with a reduced relative risk of the composite primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio 0.16, 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.51; p = 0.002).Conclusion: USG in CTO-PCI is associated with a decreased risk of vascular complications, primarily driven by a reduction in local hematomas, especially in complex CTO-PCI where the larger use of heparin increases the risk of vascular complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We sought to determine whether the chronic total occlusions (CTO) recanalization results differ between circumflex artery (CX) and other coronary arteries in our center. The study dataset encompassed 428 consecutive procedures. J-CTO score was highest in the right coronary artery (RCA) and lowest in CX lesions. After adjusting for the J-CTO score, age, body mass index, baseline creatinine, diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension the odds ratio for procedural success in CX compared to the other arteries was not statistically significant. We found no difference in success rates of recanalizing CTO in CX compared to other coronary arteries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recent results of the REVIVED-BCIS2 randomized clinical trial added further controversy on the utility of myocardial revascularization in patients with chronic coronary syndrome with reduced ejection fraction. However, coronary artery disease still represents the leading cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, with the potential for functional recovery following complete revascularization due to the restoration of the so-called hibernating myocardium. We report an emblematic case of a patient with recovery of contractile function and normalization of the left bundle branch block after percutaneous coronary intervention of the right coronary artery chronic total occlusion.

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) consists in acute decline in renal function following iodinated contrast media exposure. It has a significant impact on long-term prognosis and mortality, development of chronic kidney disease and on the rate of hospitalization due to cardiovascular or renal events. Anamnestic and procedural aspects linked to higher risk of CI-AKI have been investigated and new devices have been designed in order to prevent it. This paper deals with CI-AKI in interventional cardiology, focusing on patients' risk stratification, contrast media agent selection and contrast media volume reduction strategies, in order to suggest a standardized algorithm.

Coronary artery calcification enhances percutaneous treatment complexity, increasing the likelihood of procedural failure and complications and affecting acute and long-term outcomes. In order to deal with such lesions, several devices and technologies, including balloons, atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy, have been developed. The combination of the aforementioned technologies and the guidance of intracoronary imaging can help skilled interventional cardiologists in achieving better acute and long-term results in this setting. The purpose of the present review is to provide an appraisal of the devices dedicated to the treatment of calcified lesions, including the description of components and function and how to integrate them into a practical, standardized approach.

Coronary perforation represents a terrible complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) which, if not promptly recognized and treated, can lead to catastrophic consequences for the patient. Hence, acquisition of the basic techniques for the treatment of coronary perforations is critical for the interventional cardiologist in order to safely perform PCIs. Although the incidence of coronary perforations remains low during PCI, it is possible to recognize some subgroups of patients and some types of coronary lesions, such as chronic coronary total occlusions, that are associated with increased risk. The treatments currently available depend on the type and site of coronary perforation, therefore timely recognition is of paramount importance in order to be able to quickly establish the most appropriate treatment.

Myocardial revascularization in patients with stable ischemic heart disease aims at eliminating myocardial ischemia, in order to (i) relieve anginal symptoms; (ii) improve functional capacity; and, possibly, (iii) improve prognosis. Given that ischemic recurrences are relatively common in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization, an appropriate follow-up is needed as part of a secondary prevention program. Stress testing can be here useful to: (i) detect residual or recurrent ischemia/angina; (ii) define functional capacity in order to establish physical aerobic training individualized programs; (iii) stratify prognosis. These goals can in large part be achieved by the ECG stress test, by far the cheapest, the easiest to perform and the most accessible test among those proposed so far, particularly compared with other imaging stress test modalities. There is, however, considerable discrepancy among scientific society recommendations on the use, timing and methods of ECG stress testing and of stress testing in general after revascularization. In addition to the diversity of recommendations, the use of stress tests in general is extremely variable in current clinical practice.This review aims therefore at revisiting principles, advantages and limitations of the ECG stress test and of stress tests in general in revascularized patients, highlighting recent developments of the ECG stress technique. This should also aim at issuing new recommendations to avoid the inappropriate prescription of expensive and more cumbersome techniques, to be reserved only to a second-tier diagnostic level and in a minority of cases.