Search

Background and Aim Fatty Liver Index (FLI) is a simple clinical scoring system estimating non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is validated in European-descent and Asian populations, but not in sub-Saharan Africans. The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity of the FLI for predicting NAFLD in a population from Kenya. Methods Participants were recruited from a community-based study conducted in Kenya. NAFLD was diagnosed using hepatic ultrasonography. Clinical, anthropometrical, biochemical and lifestyle data were obtained. The accuracy and cut-off point of the FLI to detect NAFLD were evaluated by area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and the maximum Youden index analysis. Results A total of 640 participants (94 with NAFLD) were included. Mean age was 37.4 ± 0.4 years and 58.7% were women. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 22.3 ± 0.2 kg/m2 and waist circumference (WC) 79.1 ± 0.4 cm. A total of 15 (2.3%) participants were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and 65 (10.2%) with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). AUROC of FLI for predicting NAFLD was 0.80 (95% CI 0.74–0.85), which was significantly higher compared to individual components gamma-glutamyl transferase and triglycerides (p < 0.05), but not compared to anthropometric parameters BMI (AUROC of 0.83, 95% CI 0.79–0.88) and WC (AUROC of 0.81, 95% CI 0.76–0.87). Conclusions FLI is a simple valid scoring system to use in rural and urban Kenyan adults. However, this index might not be superior to BMI or WC to predict NAFLD, and those measurements might therefore be more appropriate in limited settings., Background and Aim: Fatty Liver Index (FLI) is a simple clinical scoring system estimating non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is validated in European-descent and Asian populations, but not in sub-Saharan Africans. The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity of the FLI for predicting NAFLD in a population from Kenya. Methods: Participants were recruited from a community-based study conducted in Kenya. NAFLD was diagnosed using hepatic ultrasonography. Clinical, anthropometrical, biochemical and lifestyle data were obtained. The accuracy and cut-off point of the FLI to detect NAFLD were evaluated by area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and the maximum Youden index analysis. Results: A total of 640 participants (94 with NAFLD) were included. Mean age was 37.4 ± 0.4 years and 58.7% were women. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 22.3 ± 0.2 kg/m2 and waist circumference (WC) 79.1 ± 0.4 cm. A total of 15 (2.3%) participants were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and 65 (10.2%) with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). AUROC of FLI for predicting NAFLD was 0.80 (95% CI 0.74–0.85), which was significantly higher compared to individual components gamma-glutamyl transferase and triglycerides (p < 0.05), but not compared to anthropometric parameters BMI (AUROC of 0.83, 95% CI 0.79–0.88) and WC (AUROC of 0.81, 95% CI 0.76–0.87). Conclusions: FLI is a simple valid scoring system to use in rural and urban Kenyan adults. However, this index might not be superior to BMI or WC to predict NAFLD, and those measurements might therefore be more appropriate in limited settings.

Obesity is associated with the development and progression of multiple cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and is an important contributor to the global burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Guidelines suggest that clinicians provide lifestyle counseling and promote lifestyle modifications before considering weight-loss surgery. However, despite lifestyle modifications and increased physical activity, most patients with obesity will not lose significant weight or will experience weight regain. Weight-loss pharmacotherapy added to lifestyle modification has long been perceived as a bridge between lifestyle modifications alone and weight-loss surgery. However, since its inception, weight-loss pharmacotherapy has been plagued by variable efficacy and concern about cardiovascular safety. Following requirements from regulatory authorities, efficacy and cardiovascular safety trials have been conducted for the currently available weight-loss pharmacotherapeutic agents. Overall, these trials have shown that weight-loss pharmacotherapy is only modestly efficient for the inducement of weight loss. Recent trials have also demonstrated the cardiovascular safety of some of these agents. We review these trials with a focus on the clinical impact of these weight-loss pharmacotherapeutic agents in patients with atherosclerotic CVD.

Aims: We explored the early effects of bariatric surgery on subclinical myocardial function in individuals with severe obesity and preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with severe obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2] and preserved LV ejection fraction (≥50%) who underwent bariatric surgery (biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch [BPD-DS]) (Surgery group), 19 patients with severe obesity managed with usual care (Medical group), and 18 age and sex-matched non-obese controls (non-obese group) were included. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) was evaluated with echocardiography speckle tracking imaging. Abnormal myocardial function was defined as LV GLS <18%. Results: Age of the participants was 42 ± 11 years with a BMI of 48 ± 8 kg/m2 (mean ± standard deviation); 82% were female. The percentage of total weight loss at 6 months after bariatric surgery was 26.3 ± 5.2%. Proportions of hypertension (61 vs. 30%, P = 0.0005), dyslipidemia (42 vs. 5%, P = 0.0001) and type 2 diabetes (40 vs. 13%, P = 0.002) were reduced postoperatively. Before surgery, patients with obesity displayed abnormal subclinical myocardial function vs. non-obese controls (LV GLS, 16.3 ± 2.5 vs. 19.6 ± 1.7%, P <0.001). Six months after bariatric surgery, the subclinical myocardial function was comparable to nonobese (LV GLS, 18.2 ± 1.9 vs. 19.6 ± 1.7%, surgery vs. non-obese, P = NS). On the contrary, half of individuals with obesity managed medically worsened their myocardial function during the follow-up (P = 0.002). Improvement in subclinical myocardial function following bariatric surgery was associated with changes in abdominal visceral fat (r = 0.43, P < 0.05) and inflammatory markers (r = 0.45, P < 0.01), whereas no significant association was found with weight loss or change in insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR) (P > 0.05). In a multivariate model, losing visceral fat mass was independently associated with improved subclinica

Background: In aortic stenosis (AS), metabolic syndrome (MetS) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are associated with more pronounced left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and more concentric remodeling. We aimed to assess the impact of MetS and DM on left ventricular (LV) mass, remodeling and LV mass regression after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with severe AS. Method: We included 177 patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF (>50%). All patients had comprehensive echocardiography before and one year after AVR. Results: Twenty-seven percent (27%) of patients had MetS, 21% DM and 52% neither MetS nor DM (No MetS-DM). Prior to AVR, indexed LV mass (LVMi) was higher in MetS and DM groups compared to NoMetS-DM group (56.1±14.2, 56.2±18.2 vs. 49.2±14.1 g/m2.7 respectively; p<0.01). Prevalence of LV hypertrophy was higher in MetS and DM than in NoMetS-DM patients (66%, 65% vs 44%, p<0.01) as well as LV mass to-end-diastolic volume ratio (2.10±0.44 and 2.21±0.63 vs 1.96±0.41 g/ml respectively, p=0.03). One year after AVR, decrease in LVMi was significant (p<0.001) in all 3 groups. DM and MetS were independently associated with higher baseline LVMi (p<0.05). MetS was independently associated with less LVM regression and higher LVMi 1 year after AVR. MetS and DM groups showed more residual LV hypertrophy than NoMetS-DM patients (57%, 38% and 17%, p<0.01). Conclusions: MetS and DM were independently associated with a higher preoperative LVMi and more concentric remodeling. One year after AVR, MetS was associated with less LVMi regression and higher LVMi. MetS and DM patients remained with more residual LV hypertrophy