30 results on '"Phillip D. Alderman"'
Search Results
2. A parsimonious Bayesian crop growth model for water-limited winter wheat.
- Author
-
Pratishtha Poudel, Phillip D. Alderman, Tyson E. Ochsner, and Romulo P. Lollato
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Evidence for increasing global wheat yield potential
- Author
-
Jose Rafael Guarin, Pierre Martre, Frank Ewert, Heidi Webber, Sibylle Dueri, Daniel Calderini, Matthew Reynolds, Gemma Molero, Daniel Miralles, Guillermo Garcia, Gustavo Slafer, Francesco Giunta, Diego N L Pequeno, Tommaso Stella, Mukhtar Ahmed, Phillip D Alderman, Bruno Basso, Andres G Berger, Marco Bindi, Gennady Bracho-Mujica, Davide Cammarano, Yi Chen, Benjamin Dumont, Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei, Elias Fereres, Roberto Ferrise, Thomas Gaiser, Yujing Gao, Margarita Garcia-Vila, Sebastian Gayler, Zvi Hochman, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Leslie A Hunt, Kurt C Kersebaum, Claas Nendel, Jørgen E Olesen, Taru Palosuo, Eckart Priesack, Johannes W M Pullens, Alfredo Rodríguez, Reimund P Rötter, Margarita Ruiz Ramos, Mikhail A Semenov, Nimai Senapati, Stefan Siebert, Amit Kumar Srivastava, Claudio Stöckle, Iwan Supit, Fulu Tao, Peter Thorburn, Enli Wang, Tobias Karl David Weber, Liujun Xiao, Zhao Zhang, Chuang Zhao, Jin Zhao, Zhigan Zhao, Yan Zhu, and Senthold Asseng
- Subjects
yield increase ,radiation use efficiency ,wheat potential yield ,crop model ensemble ,global food security ,Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering ,TD1-1066 ,Environmental sciences ,GE1-350 ,Science ,Physics ,QC1-999 - Abstract
Wheat is the most widely grown food crop, with 761 Mt produced globally in 2020. To meet the expected grain demand by mid-century, wheat breeding strategies must continue to improve upon yield-advancing physiological traits, regardless of climate change impacts. Here, the best performing doubled haploid (DH) crosses with an increased canopy photosynthesis from wheat field experiments in the literature were extrapolated to the global scale with a multi-model ensemble of process-based wheat crop models to estimate global wheat production. The DH field experiments were also used to determine a quantitative relationship between wheat production and solar radiation to estimate genetic yield potential. The multi-model ensemble projected a global annual wheat production of 1050 ± 145 Mt due to the improved canopy photosynthesis, a 37% increase, without expanding cropping area. Achieving this genetic yield potential would meet the lower estimate of the projected grain demand in 2050, albeit with considerable challenges.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Ecophysiological modeling of yield and yield components in winter wheat using hierarchical Bayesian analysis
- Author
-
Phillip D. Alderman, Ye Liang, David A. Marburger, Pratishtha Poudel, Nora M. Bello, and Brett F. Carver
- Subjects
Agronomy ,Biofuel ,Yield (finance) ,Winter wheat ,Bayesian probability ,Biology ,Agronomy and Crop Science - Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A comprehensive R interface for the DSSAT Cropping Systems Model.
- Author
-
Phillip D. Alderman
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Sustaining productivity gains in the face of climate change: A research agenda for US wheat
- Author
-
Yoko Kusunose, Jairus J. Rossi, David A. Van Sanford, Phillip D. Alderman, James A. Anderson, Yuan Chai, Maria K. Gerullis, S. V. Krishna Jagadish, Pierce A. Paul, Jesse B. Tack, and Brian D. Wright
- Subjects
Global and Planetary Change ,Ecology ,Environmental Chemistry ,General Environmental Science - Abstract
Wheat is a globally important crop and one of the "big three" US field crops. But unlike the other two (maize and soybean), in the United States its development is commercially unattractive, and so its breeding takes place primarily in public universities. Troublingly, the incentive structures within these universities may be hindering genetic improvement just as climate change is complicating breeding efforts. "Business as usual" in the US public wheat-breeding infrastructure may not sustain productivity increases. To address this concern, we held a multidisciplinary conference in which researchers from 12 US (public) universities and one European university shared the current state of knowledge in their disciplines, aired concerns, and proposed initiatives that could facilitate maintaining genetic improvement of wheat in the face of climate change. We discovered that climate-change-oriented breeding efforts are currently considered too risky and/or costly for most university wheat breeders to undertake, leading to a relative lack of breeding efforts that focus on abiotic stressors such as drought and heat. We hypothesize that this risk/cost burden can be reduced through the development of appropriate germplasm, relevant screening mechanisms, consistent germplasm characterization, and innovative models predicting the performance of germplasm under projected future climate conditions. However, doing so will require coordinated, longer-term, inter-regional efforts to generate phenotype data, and the modification of incentive structures to consistently reward such efforts.
- Published
- 2022
7. Modeling Evapotranspiration of Winter Wheat Using Contextual and Pixel-Based Surface Energy Balance Models
- Author
-
Kul Khand, Phillip D. Alderman, Pradeep Wagle, Nishan Bhattarai, Prasanna H. Gowda, and Saleh Taghvaeian
- Subjects
SEBAL ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Mean squared error ,0208 environmental biotechnology ,Biomedical Engineering ,Energy balance ,Soil Science ,Forestry ,02 engineering and technology ,Vegetation ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,020801 environmental engineering ,Evapotranspiration ,Available energy ,Calibration ,Environmental science ,Scale (map) ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Food Science - Abstract
HighlightsThree contextual-based (CB) and two pixel-based (PB) models were evaluated to estimate ET of rainfed winter wheat.Instantaneous available energy estimation and ET upscaling impacted model performance.The CB models performed better at instantaneous and daily scales compared to the PB models.ET estimation biases increased during low vegetation and drier conditions, especially for the PB models.Abstract. Surface energy balance (SEB) models based on thermal remote sensing data are widely used in research applications to map evapotranspiration (ET) across various landscapes. However, their ability to capture ET from winter wheat remains underexplored, especially in practical applications such as integrated resource management and drought preparedness. Investigating winter wheat ET dynamics is important in agricultural regions such as the Southern Great Plains of the U.S., where winter wheat is extensively cultivated. The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of five fully automated SEB models, three contextual-based (CB) and two pixel-based (PB), in estimating instantaneous and daily ET of winter wheat by comparing the model results with flux tower observations. The CB models included Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL), Mapping Evapotranspiration at high Resolution with Internalized Calibration (METRIC), and Triangular Vegetation Temperature (TVT). The PB models included Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) and Two-Source Energy Balance (TSEB). Model evaluation during two winter wheat growing seasons (2016-2018) using 28 Landsat images showed that the instantaneous ET estimates from METRIC and TSEB had the smallest (RMSE = 0.14 mm h-1) and largest (RMSE = 0.27 mm h-1) errors, respectively. At the daily scale, SEBAL was the best performing model (RMSE = 1.0 mm d-1), followed by TVT (RMSE = 1.1 mm d-1), METRIC (RMSE = 1.2 mm d-1), SEBS (RMSE = 1.3 mm d-1), and TSEB (RMSE = 1.5 mm d-1). Overall, the CB models provided smaller errors than the PB models. Larger errors in daily ET estimation were observed during low vegetation and drier conditions, especially for the PB models. Keywords: Flux tower, Landsat, Southern Great Plains, Water use.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Morpho-Physiological Characterization of Winter Wheat 'Buster' Population during the Vegetative Stage under Heat Stress
- Author
-
Brett F. Carver, Phillip D. Alderman, Vijaya Gopal Kakani, and Pratishtha Poudel
- Subjects
Stomatal conductance ,education.field_of_study ,Population ,food and beverages ,Greenhouse ,General Medicine ,Biology ,Photosynthesis ,Horticulture ,Doubled haploidy ,Tiller ,Water-use efficiency ,education ,Transpiration - Abstract
Phenotypic assessment of breeding population is important to identify robust lines for incorporating into future breeding programs. The objective of this study was to identify potential lines from a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) population, based on their morpho-physiological traits, for improved heat tolerance. A subset of 100 lines of the double haploid (DH) population named “Buster”, developed from two successful Oklahoma wheat varieties (Billings and Duster), was used in the study. Two experiments were conducted one in a greenhouse and the other in growth chambers. Data on plant height, tiller number, leaf number, and photosynthetic pigments were collected from the greenhouse; whereas the data on physiological parameters (leaf net photosynthesis (Pn), transpiration (T), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci), electron transport rate (ETR), Photosystem II efficiency (Fv'/Fm') and instantaneous water use efficiency (IWUE)) were collected from the growth chambers. Buster lines were significantly (P 2 m-2·s-1. The differences in leaf physiological parameters were more discernible under heat stress. This study provides a piece of baseline information on morpho-physiological characteristics of Buster lines, and identified lines can be used in future breeding programs for incorporating heat stress tolerance.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase is involved in fine regulation of flowering time in winter wheat
- Author
-
Brett F. Carver, Genqiao Li, Phillip D. Alderman, Liuling Yan, Haiyan Jia, Carol Powers, Fang Miao, Min Fan, Ragupathi Nagarajan, and Zhengqiang Ma
- Subjects
Agricultural genetics ,0106 biological sciences ,0301 basic medicine ,Science ,Acclimatization ,Quantitative Trait Loci ,Population ,General Physics and Astronomy ,Flowers ,Quantitative trait locus ,Biology ,Quantitative trait ,N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferases ,01 natural sciences ,Article ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Plant development ,Botany ,Cultivar ,education ,Gene ,Triticum ,Plant Proteins ,education.field_of_study ,Multidisciplinary ,fungi ,food and beverages ,General Chemistry ,Vernalization ,Plants, Genetically Modified ,Genetically modified organism ,Complementation ,030104 developmental biology ,Seasons ,Adaptation ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
Vernalization genes underlying dramatic differences in flowering time between spring wheat and winter wheat have been studied extensively, but little is known about genes that regulate subtler differences in flowering time among winter wheat cultivars, which account for approximately 75% of wheat grown worldwide. Here, we identify a gene encoding an O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase (OGT) that differentiates heading date between winter wheat cultivars Duster and Billings. We clone this TaOGT1 gene from a quantitative trait locus (QTL) for heading date in a mapping population derived from these two bread wheat cultivars and analyzed in various environments. Transgenic complementation analysis shows that constitutive overexpression of TaOGT1b from Billings accelerates the heading of transgenic Duster plants. TaOGT1 is able to transfer an O-GlcNAc group to wheat protein TaGRP2. Our findings establish important roles for TaOGT1 in winter wheat in adaptation to global warming in the future climate scenarios., Little is known about genes that regulate flowering time difference among winter wheat cultivars. Here, via map-based cloning, the authors show the role of an O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase TaOGT1 in regulating flowering time difference among winter wheat cultivars.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. A hierarchical Bayesian approach to dynamic ordinary differential equations modeling for repeated measures data on wheat growth
- Author
-
Pratishtha Poudel, Nora M. Bello, Romulo P. Lollato, and Phillip D. Alderman
- Subjects
Soil Science ,Agronomy and Crop Science - Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Exploring long-term variety performance trials to improve environment-specific genotype x management recommendations: A case-study for winter wheat
- Author
-
Romulo P. Lollato, Jeffrey T. Edwards, J.E. Lingenfelser, Alan J. Schlegel, Allan K. Fritz, S.H. Unêda-Trevisoli, Trevor J. Hefley, Erick DeWolf, D. Marburger, Jerry Johnson, Guorong Zhang, Phillip D. Alderman, S.M. Jones-Diamond, Lucas Berger Munaro, Scott D. Haley, Lucas A. Haag, Kansas State Univ, Colorado State Univ, Oklahoma State Univ, and Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Yield (finance) ,Management practices ,Drought tolerance ,Soil Science ,Sowing ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Biology ,Crop rotation ,01 natural sciences ,Term (time) ,Fungicide ,Tillage ,Exploratory analysis ,Agronomy ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,Trait ,G x E x M ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Long-term data ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Conditional inference trees ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
Made available in DSpace on 2020-12-10T20:07:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2020-09-15 Kansas Wheat Alliance Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station (KAES) The complex and interactive effects of genotype (G), environment (E), and management (M) can be a barrier to the development of sound agronomic recommendations. We hypothesize that long-term variety performance trials (VPT) can be used to understand these effects and improve regional recommendations. Our objective was to explore long-term VPT data to improve management and variety-selection recommendations using winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the U.S. central Great Plains as a case-study. Data of grain yield, variety, and trial management were collected from 748 wheat VPT conducted in the states of Colorado, Kansas, and Oklahoma over nineteen harvest years (2000-2018) and 92 locations, resulting in 97,996 yield observations. Using 30-yr cumulative annual precipitation and growing degrees days, we partitioned the study region into 11 contiguous sub-regions, which we refer to as growing adaptation regions (GAR). We used variance component analysis, gradient boosted trees, and conditional inference trees to explore the management and variety trait effects within each GAR. For the variety trait analysis, the VPT dataset was reduced to account for varieties for which 17 agronomic traits and 11 disease/insect reaction ratings were available (65,264 yield observations). GAR accounted for 46 % of the total variation in grain yield, M for 32 %, residuals (including interactions) for 13 %, year for 7 %, and G for 2 %. Conditional inference trees identified interactions among management practices and their effects on yield within each GAR. For instance, water regime was the most important practice influencing wheat yield in the semi-arid western portion of the study region, followed by sowing date and fungicide. In dryland trials, there was typically an interaction between fungicide, sowing date, and tillage system, depending on GAR. Other management practices (e.g. dual-purpose management, crop rotation, and tillage practice) also significantly affected yield, depending on GAR. The main variety trait associated with increased yields depended on region and management combination. For instance, drought tolerance was the most important trait in dryland trials while stripe rust tolerance was more relevant in irrigated trials in the semi-arid region. In this research, we demonstrated an approach that uses widely available long-term VPT data to improve management and variety selection recommendations and can be used in other regions and crops for which long-term VPT data are available. Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA Kansas State Univ, Dept Stat, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA Kansas State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA Colorado State Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Crop Prod, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Crop Prod, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil Kansas Wheat Alliance: GAGR004805BG5828
- Published
- 2020
12. Species-genotypic parameters of the CROPGRO Perennial Forage Model: Implications for comparison of three tropical pasture grasses
- Author
-
Diego N. L. Pequeno, Phillip D. Alderman, Carlos Guilherme Silveira Pedreira, Ana Flávia G. Faria, and Kenneth J. Boote
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,geography ,Biomass (ecology) ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,SIMULAÇÃO ,Perennial plant ,biology ,Field experiment ,Forage ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,biology.organism_classification ,01 natural sciences ,Pasture ,Brachiaria ,Cynodon ,Agronomy ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Leaf area index ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
Brachiaria and Cynodon are two of the most important pasture grasses worldwide. Computer model simulations can be used to study pasture species growth and physiological aspects to identify gaps of knowledge for genetic improvement and management strategies. The objective of this research was to compare the performance relative to calibrated parameters of the CROPGRO‐Perennial Forage Model (CROPGRO‐PFM) for simulating three different species (“Marandu” palisadegrass, “Convert HD 364®” brachiariagrass and “Tifton 85” bermudagrass) grown under similar management. The field experiment consisted of two harvest frequencies, 28 and 42 days, under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Data used to calibrate the model included regular forage harvests, plant‐part composition, leaf photosynthesis, leaf area index, light interception and plant nitrogen concentration. The simulation of biomass production of the three grasses presented d‐statistic values higher than 0.80, RMSE ranging from 313 to 619 kg/ha and ratio observed/simulated ranging 0.968 to 1.027. Harvest frequency treatments of 28 and 42 days were well simulated by the model. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the most influential parameters needed for model calibration and to contrast the grasses, showing that the differences among the three grasses are mostly driven by plant‐part composition and assimilate partitioning among plant organs.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Quantifying model-structure- and parameter-driven uncertainties in spring wheat phenology prediction with Bayesian analysis
- Author
-
Bryan Stanfill and Phillip D. Alderman
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Bayesian probability ,Soil Science ,Plant Science ,01 natural sciences ,Wheat phenology ,Bayesian parameter estimation ,Statistics ,Prediction uncertainty ,Sensitivity analysis ,Uncertainty analysis ,Mathematics ,2. Zero hunger ,Structure (mathematical logic) ,Phenology ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Random walk ,Metropolis–Hastings algorithm ,13. Climate action ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,Crop modeling ,Agricultural systems modeling ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
Recent international efforts have brought renewed emphasis on the comparison of different agricultural systems models. Thus far, analysis of model-ensemble simulated results has not clearly differentiated between ensemble prediction uncertainties due to model structural differences per se and those due to parameter value uncertainties. Additionally, despite increasing use of Bayesian parameter estimation approaches with field-scale crop models, inadequate attention has been given to the full posterior distributions for estimated parameters. The objectives of this study were to quantify the impact of parameter value uncertainty on prediction uncertainty for modeling spring wheat phenology using Bayesian analysis and to assess the relative contributions of model-structure-driven and parameter-value-driven uncertainty to overall prediction uncertainty. This study used a random walk Metropolis algorithm to estimate parameters for 30 spring wheat genotypes using nine phenology models based on multi-location trial data for days to heading and days to maturity. Across all cases, parameter-driven uncertainty accounted for between 19 and 52% of predictive uncertainty, while model-structure-driven uncertainty accounted for between 12 and 64%. This study demonstrated the importance of quantifying both model-structure- and parameter-value-driven uncertainty when assessing overall prediction uncertainty in modeling spring wheat phenology. More generally, Bayesian parameter estimation provided a useful framework for quantifying and analyzing sources of prediction uncertainty.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Reliability of Genotype-Specific Parameter Estimation for Crop Models: Insights from a Markov Chain Monte-Carlo Estimation Approach
- Author
-
C. E. Vallejos, Phillip D. Alderman, James W. Jones, Kenneth J. Boote, Hu ZhengJun, Melanie J. Correll, and Subodh Acharya
- Subjects
Estimation ,Mathematical optimization ,Computer science ,Estimation theory ,Variable-order Markov model ,Biomedical Engineering ,Soil Science ,Forestry ,Markov chain Monte Carlo ,symbols.namesake ,symbols ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Reliability (statistics) ,Food Science - Abstract
Parameter estimation is a critical step in successful application of dynamic crop models to simulate crop growth and yield under various climatic and management scenarios. Although inverse modeling parameterization techniques significantly improve the predictive capabilities of models, whether these approaches can recover the true parameter values of a specific genotype or cultivar is seldom investigated. In this study, we applied a Markov Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) method to the DSSAT dry bean model to estimate (recover) the genotype-specific parameters (GSPs) of 150 synthetic recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of dry bean. The synthetic parents of the population were assigned contrasting GSP values obtained from a database, and each of these GSPs was associated with several quantitative trait loci. A standard inverse modeling approach that simultaneously estimated all GSPs generated a set of values that could reproduce the original synthetic observations, but many of the estimated GSP values significantly differed from the original values. However, when parameter estimation was carried out sequentially in a stepwise manner, according to the genetically controlled plant development process, most of the estimated parameters had values similar to the original values. Developmental parameters were more accurately estimated than those related to dry mass accumulation. This new approach appears to reduce the problem of equifinality in parameter estimation, and it is especially relevant if attempts are made to relate parameter values to individual genes. Keywords: Crop models, Equifinality, Genotype-specific parameters, Markov chain Monte-Carlo, Parameterization.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. The value of seasonal forecasts for irrigated, supplementary irrigated, and rainfed wheat cropping systems in northwest Mexico
- Author
-
Melissa A. Ramirez-Rodrigues, Lydia Stefanova, Dagoberto Flores, C. Mariano Cossani, Senthold Asseng, and Phillip D. Alderman
- Subjects
Irrigation ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Sowing ,Forecast skill ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Arid ,Crop ,Soil water ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Environmental science ,Production (economics) ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Water resource management ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Cropping ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
Half of global wheat production occurs in irrigated cropping regions that face increasing water shortages. In these regions, seasonal forecasts could provide information about in-season climate conditions that could improve resource management, helping to save water and other inputs. However, seasonal forecasts have not been tested in irrigated systems. In this study, we show that seasonal forecasts have the potential to guide crop management decisions in fully irrigated systems (FIS), reduced irrigation systems (supplementary irrigation; SIS), and systems without irrigation (rainfed; RFS) in an arid environment. We found that farmers could gain an additional 2 USD ha − 1 season − 1 in net returns and save up to 26 USD ha − 1 season − 1 in N fertilizer costs with a hypothetical always-correct-season-type-forecast (ACF) in a fully irrigated system compared to simulated optimized N fertilizer applications. In supplementary irrigated systems, an ACF had value when deciding on sowing a crop (plus supplementary irrigation) of up to 65 USD ha − 1 season − 1 . In rainfed systems, this value was up to 123 USD ha − 1 when deciding whether or not to sow a crop. In supplementary irrigated and rainfed systems, such value depended on initial soil water conditions. Seasonal forecasts have the potential to assist farmers in irrigated, supplementary irrigated, and rainfed cropping systems to maximize crop profitability. However, forecasts currently available based on Global Circulation Models (GCM) and the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) need higher forecast skill before such benefits can be fully realized.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Development and Deployment of a Portable Field Phenotyping Platform
- Author
-
Phillip D. Alderman, Sean M. Thompson, Matthew P. Reynolds, Jared Barker, Yong Wei, Naiqian Zhang, Jesse Poland, and Jared Crain
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,0301 basic medicine ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,Development (topology) ,Field (physics) ,Software deployment ,Systems engineering ,Biology ,01 natural sciences ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,010606 plant biology & botany - Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Adapting the CSM-CROPGRO model for pigeonpea using sequential parameter estimation
- Author
-
Phillip D. Alderman, Virender Singh Bhatia, James W. Jones, and Kenneth J. Boote
- Subjects
Observational error ,Estimation theory ,Statistics ,Soil Science ,Crop simulation model ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Mathematics - Abstract
Pigeonpea ( Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) is an important crop in Asia, Africa, Latin America and Caribbean. Despite pigeonpea's global importance there is a dearth of crop simulation models available for studying pigeonpea growth. The objectives of this study were to adapt the CSM-CROPGRO model for simulating pigeonpea growth and development through parameter modification and to illustrate the use of a sequential parameter estimation technique using a dataset from Gainesville, FL in 1984 and a dataset from India in 2003. The sequential approach to parameter estimation using a hybrid Metropolis–Hastings–Gibbs algorithm worked well at estimating physiologically plausible values for parameters with good correspondence to measured data. Reasonable results were obtained despite the use of approximations for measurement errors for the Gainesville dataset, which contained only treatment means. This study demonstrated that CROPGRO can be used to simulate the growth and development of pigeonpea. However, further testing of CROPGRO with more extensive pigeonpea datasets should be undertaken to confirm the accuracy of the parameter estimates developed from this study. Further theoretical and practical research into the parameter estimation approach is needed.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Erratum: The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions
- Author
-
Enli Wang, Pierre Martre, Zhigan Zhao, Frank Ewert, Andrea Maiorano, Reimund P. Rötter, Bruce A. Kimball, Michael J. Ottman, Gerard W. Wall, Jeffrey W. White, Matthew P. Reynolds, Phillip D. Alderman, Pramod K. Aggarwal, Jakarat Anothai, Bruno Basso, Christian Biernath, Davide Cammarano, Andrew J. Challinor, Giacomo De Sanctis, Jordi Doltra, Elias Fereres, Margarita Garcia-Vila, Sebastian Gayler, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Leslie A. Hunt, Roberto C. Izaurralde, Mohamed Jabloun, Curtis D. Jones, Kurt C. Kersebaum, Ann-Kristin Koehler, Leilei Liu, Christoph Müller, Soora Naresh Kumar, Claas Nendel, Garry O’Leary, Jørgen E. Olesen, Taru Palosuo, Eckart Priesack, Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei, Dominique Ripoche, Alex C. Ruane, Mikhail A. Semenov, Iurii Shcherbak, Claudio Stöckle, Pierre Stratonovitch, Thilo Streck, Iwan Supit, Fulu Tao, Peter Thorburn, Katharina Waha, Daniel Wallach, Zhimin Wang, Joost Wolf, Yan Zhu, and Senthold Asseng
- Subjects
Plant Science - Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions
- Author
-
Alex C. Ruane, Peter J. Thorburn, Mikhail A. Semenov, Joost Wolf, Claudio O. Stöckle, Pramod K. Aggarwal, Gerard W. Wall, Margarita Garcia-Vila, Matthew P. Reynolds, Eckart Priesack, Jørgen E. Olesen, Enli Wang, Bruce A. Kimball, Jordi Doltra, Iurii Shcherbak, Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei, Jeffrey W. White, Leilei Liu, L. A. Hunt, Senthold Asseng, Frank Ewert, Yan Zhu, Fulu Tao, Christoph Müller, Daniel Wallach, Christian Biernath, Davide Cammarano, Mohamed Jabloun, Zhigan Zhao, Michael J. Ottman, Pierre Martre, Sebastian Gayler, Garry O'Leary, Zhimin Wang, Jakarat Anothai, Elias Fereres, Claas Nendel, Bruno Basso, Thilo Streck, Curtis D. Jones, Andrea Maiorano, Phillip D. Alderman, Andrew J. Challinor, Reimund P. Rötter, Taru Palosuo, Iwan Supit, Katharina Waha, Giacomo De Sanctis, Kurt Christian Kersebaum, Soora Naresh Kumar, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Dominique Ripoche, Pierre Stratonovitch, Ann-Kristin Koehler, Roberto C. Izaurralde, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (Australia), Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Scholarship Council, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (France), European Commission, International Food Policy Research Institute (US), CGIAR (France), Department of Agriculture (US), Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, Danish Council for Strategic Research, Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (Germany), Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Helmholtz Association, Grains Research and Development Corporation (Australia), Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, National Institute of Food and Agriculture (US), CSIRO, Écophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress environnementaux (LEPSE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Division of Plant Nutrition-University of Bonn, Institute of Landscape Systems Analysis, Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung = Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Department of Crop Sciences, University of Goettingen, Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use (CBL), United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, The School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Global Wheat Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Washington State University (WSU), Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University [East Lansing], Michigan State University System-Michigan State University System, Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology (BIOP), German Research Center for Environmental Health - Helmholtz Center München (GmbH), Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Purdue University [West Lafayette], Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science [Leeds] (ICAS), School of Earth and Environment [Leeds] (SEE), University of Leeds-University of Leeds, GMO Unit, European Food Safety Authority = Autorité européenne de sécurité des aliments, Cantabrian Agricultural Research and Training Centre, Dep. Agronomia, University of Córdoba [Córdoba], Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland [College Park], University of Maryland System-University of Maryland System, Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Texas A&M University System, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University [Aarhus], National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricutural University, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Centre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture (CESCRA), Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), Department of Economic Development, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (DEDJTR), Natural Resources Institute Finland, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, UE Agroclim (UE AGROCLIM), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Computational and Systems Biology Department, Rothamsted Research, Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, PPS and WSG &CALM, Wageningen University and Research Center (WUR), Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] (CAS), Agriculture and Food, Universidad de La Rioja (UR), UMR : AGroécologie, Innovations, TeRritoires, Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Toulouse, China Agricultural University, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation [Canberra] (CSIRO), Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro), China Agricultural University (CAU), Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation [Bonn], Georg-August-University [Göttingen], Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR] (CGIAR)-Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR] (CGIAR), CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering [Gainesville] (UF|ABE), Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences [Gainesville] (UF|IFAS), University of Florida [Gainesville] (UF)-University of Florida [Gainesville] (UF), University of Leeds, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Catabrian Agricultural Research and Training Center (CIFA), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC), AgWeatherNet Program, Texas A and M AgriLife Research, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Landscape and Water Sciences, Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Agroclim (AGROCLIM), Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (AGIR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, European Project: 267196,EC:FP7:PEOPLE,FP7-PEOPLE-2010-COFUND,AGREENSKILLS(2012), Écophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress environnementaux ( LEPSE ), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique ( INRA ) -Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques ( Montpellier SupAgro ) -Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier ( Montpellier SupAgro ), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center ( CIMMYT ), CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security ( CCAFS ), Washington State University ( WSU ), Michigan State University, Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology ( BIOP ), Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, European Food Safety Authority, Spanish National Research Council ( CSIC ), Texas A and M University ( TAMU ), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research ( PIK ), Centre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture ( CESCRA ), Indian Agricultural Research Institute ( IARI ), Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources ( DEDJTR ), University of Bonn (Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms), UE Agroclim ( UE AGROCLIM ), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique ( INRA ), NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies ( GISS ), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center ( GSFC ), University of Wisconsin-Madison [Madison], Wageningen University and Research Center ( WUR ), Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] ( CAS ), Universidad de La Rioja ( UR ), University of Bonn-Division of Plant Nutrition, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), USDA-ARS : Agricultural Research Service, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR]-Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR], Natural resources institute Finland, Georg-August-University = Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Universidad de Córdoba = University of Córdoba [Córdoba], Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)-Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), and Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)
- Subjects
Crops, Agricultural ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Yield (finance) ,Water en Voedsel ,Growing season ,Climate change ,klim ,Plant Science ,Agricultural engineering ,Models, Biological ,01 natural sciences ,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences ,Crop ,Life Science ,Computer Simulation ,Productivity ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,2. Zero hunger ,[ SDE.BE ] Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology ,WIMEK ,Water and Food ,Food security ,business.industry ,Crop yield ,Temperature ,Agriculture ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,15. Life on land ,Climate Resilience ,Agronomy ,Klimaatbestendigheid ,13. Climate action ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Environmental science ,Water Systems and Global Change ,[SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology ,business - Abstract
Increasing the accuracy of crop productivity estimates is a key element in planning adaptation strategies to ensure global food security under climate change. Process-based crop models are effective means to project climate impact on crop yield, but have large uncertainty in yield simulations. Here, we show that variations in the mathematical functions currently used to simulate temperature responses of physiological processes in 29 wheat models account for >50% of uncertainty in simulated grain yields for mean growing season temperatures from 14 °C to 33 °C. We derived a set of new temperature response functions that when substituted in four wheat models reduced the error in grain yield simulations across seven global sites with different temperature regimes by 19% to 50% (42% average). We anticipate the improved temperature responses to be a key step to improve modelling of crops under rising temperature and climate change, leading to higher skill of crop yield projections., E.W. acknowledges support from the CSIRO project ‘Enhanced modelling of genotype by environment interactions’ and the project ‘Advancing crop yield while reducing the use of water and nitrogen’ jointly funded by CSIRO and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). Z.Z. received a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council through the CSIRO and the Chinese Ministry of Education PhD Research Program. P.M., A.M. and D.R. acknowledge support from the FACCE JPI MACSUR project (031A103B) through the metaprogram Adaptation of Agriculture and Forests to Climate Change (AAFCC) of the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA). A.M. received the support of the EU in the framework of the Marie-Curie FP7 COFUND People Programme, through the award of an AgreenSkills fellowship under grant agreement No. PCOFUND-GA-2010-267196. S.A. and D.C. acknowledge support provided by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), the CGIAR Research Program on Wheat and the Wheat Initiative. C.S. was funded through USDA National Institute for Food and Agriculture award 32011-68002-30191. C.M. received financial support from the KULUNDA project (01LL0905 L) and the FACCE MACSUR project (031A103B) funded through the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). F.E. received support from the FACCE MACSUR project (031A103B) funded through the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2812ERA115) and E.E.R. was funded through the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (Project: PARI). M.J. and J.E.O. were funded through the FACCE MACSUR project by the Danish Strategic Research Council. K.C.K. and C.N. were funded by the FACCE MACSUR project through the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL). F.T., T.P. and R.P.R. received financial support from the FACCE MACSUR project funded through the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MMM); F.T. was also funded through the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41071030). C.B. was funded through the Helmholtz project ‘REKLIM-Regional Climate Change: Causes and Effects’ Topic 9: ‘Climate Change and Air Quality’. M.P.R. and PD.A. received funding from the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food Security (CCAFS). G.O'L. was funded through the Australian Grains Research and Development Corporation and the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources Victoria, Australia. R.C.I. was funded by Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University. B.B. was funded by USDA-NIFA Grant No: 2015-68007-23133.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. The International Heat Stress Genotype Experiment for modeling wheat response to heat: field experiments and AgMIP-Wheat multi-model simulations
- Author
-
L. A. Hunt, David B. Lobell, Phillip D. Alderman, Alex C. Ruane, Zhigan Zhao, T. Palosuo, Mohamed Jabloun, Margarita Garcia-Vila, Andrew J. Challinor, Reimund P. Rötter, Jordi Doltra, Dominique Ripoche, Jeffrey W. White, Bing Liu, Jakarat Anothai, Fulu Tao, Katharina Waha, Eckart Priesack, Sebastian Gayler, Pierre Stratonovitch, Andrea Maiorano, Davide Cammarano, Christoph Müller, Bruno Basso, Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei, Senthold Asseng, Claas Nendel, Joost Wolf, Curtis D. Jones, Ann-Kristin Koehler, Matthew P. Reynolds, Enli Wang, Belay T. Kassie, Christian Biernath, Soora Naresh Kumar, Pierre Martre, Frank Ewert, Iwan Supit, Jørgen E. Olesen, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Giacomo De Sanctis, Thilo Streck, Elias Fereres, Yan Zhu, Kurt Christian Kersebaum, Mikhail A. Semenov, Claudio O. Stöckle, Benjamin Dumont, Roberto C. Izaurralde, Peter J. Thorburn, Garry O'Leary, and Pramod K. Aggarwal
- Subjects
Simulations ,0106 biological sciences ,Water en Voedsel ,klim ,01 natural sciences ,Heat stress ,Crop ,heat stress ,Anthesis ,Yield (wine) ,wheat ,Life Science ,Cultivar ,field experimental data ,Biomass (ecology) ,WIMEK ,Water and Food ,Field experimental data ,Sowing ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,PE&RC ,Productivity (ecology) ,Agronomy ,Plant Production Systems ,Plantaardige Productiesystemen ,Wheat ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Environmental science ,Water Systems and Global Change ,simulations ,Cropping ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
All data are available via DOI http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ECSFZG, he data set contains a portion of the International Heat Stress Genotype Experiment (IHSGE) data used in the AgMIP-Wheat project to analyze the uncertainty of 30 wheat crop models and quantify the impact of heat on global wheat yield productivity. It includes two spring wheat cultivars grown during two consecutive winter cropping cycles at hot, irrigated, and low latitude sites in Mexico (Ciudad Obregon and Tlaltizapan), Egypt (Aswan), India (Dharwar), the Sudan (Wad Medani), and Bangladesh (Dinajpur). Experiments in Mexico included normal (November-December) and late (January-March) sowing dates. Data include local daily weather data, soil characteristics and initial soil conditions, crop measurements (anthesis and maturity dates, anthesis and final total above ground biomass, final grain yields and yields components), and cultivar information. Simulations include both daily in-season and end-of-season results from 30 wheat models.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods
- Author
-
Frank Ewert, Jakarat Anothai, P. V. Vara Prasad, Davide Cammarano, Curtis D. Jones, Elias Fereres, Margarita Garcia-Vila, Soora Naresh Kumar, Eckart Priesack, Phillip D. Alderman, Andrew J. Challinor, Reimund P. Rötter, Alex C. Ruane, Christian Folberth, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Pierre Martre, Roberto C. Izaurralde, Fulu Tao, Pramod K. Aggarwal, Mohamed Jabloun, Jordi Doltra, Joshua Elliott, Christoph Müller, Bing Liu, Iurii Shcherbak, Jeffrey W. White, Bruno Basso, Senthold Asseng, Pierre Stratonovitch, Peter J. Thorburn, Claas Nendel, Taru Palosuo, Joost Wolf, Ann-Kristin Koehler, Thilo Streck, Jørgen E. Olesen, David B. Lobell, Kurt Christian Kersebaum, Delphine Deryng, L. A. Hunt, Garry O'Leary, Katharina Waha, Giacomo De Sanctis, Daniel Wallach, Yan Zhu, James W. Jones, Elke Stehfest, Mikhail A. Semenov, Christian Biernath, Claudio O. Stöckle, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Matthew P. Reynolds, Enli Wang, Bruce A. Kimball, Erwin Schmid, Iwan Supit, Zhigan Zhao, Michael J. Ottman, Sebastian Gayler, Cynthia Rosenzweig, Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei, Gerard W. Wall, National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricutural University, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering [Gainesville] (UF|ABE), Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences [Gainesville] (UF|IFAS), University of Florida [Gainesville] (UF)-University of Florida [Gainesville] (UF), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation [Bonn] (INRES), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF), Leibniz Association, Center for Climate Systems Research [New York] (CCSR), Columbia University [New York], Computation Institute, Loyola University of Chicago, Department of Environmental Earth System Science and Center on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University, Génétique Diversité et Ecophysiologie des Céréales (GDEC), Université Blaise Pascal - Clermont-Ferrand 2 (UBP)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (AGIR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, Borlaug Institute for South Asia, CIMMYT, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University [Mississippi], Department of Plant Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, Prince of Songkla University (PSU), Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon [Eugene], W. K. Kellogg Biological Station (KBS), Michigan State University [East Lansing], Michigan State University System-Michigan State University System, Institute of Soil Ecology [Neuherberg] (IBOE), Helmholtz-Zentrum München (HZM), The James Hutton Institute, Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science [Leeds] (ICAS), School of Earth and Environment [Leeds] (SEE), University of Leeds-University of Leeds, CGIAR-ESSP Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, International Center for Tropical Agriculture, European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Ispra] (JRC), Cantabrian Agricultural Research and Training Centre, Department of Agronomy, Purdue University [West Lafayette], Department of Geography, University of Liverpool, Ecosystem Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, AgWeatherNet Program, Washington State University (WSU), Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland [College Park], University of Maryland System-University of Maryland System, Texas A and M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University System, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University [Aarhus], US Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Centre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture (CESCRA), Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), Institute of Landscape Systems Analysis, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Landscape & Water Sciences, Department of Environment of Victoria, The School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Natural resources institute Finland, Institute of Ecology, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung - Atmosphärische Umweltforschung (IMK-IFU), Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences [Birmingham], University of Birmingham [Birmingham], Birmingham Institute of Forest Research (BIFoR), International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR] (CGIAR), Center for Development Research (ZEF), Environmental Impacts Group, Georg-August-University [Göttingen], Universität für Bodenkultur Wien [Vienne, Autriche] (BOKU), Computational and Systems Biology Department, Rothamsted Research, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, PPS, WSG and CALM, Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] (CAS), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation [Canberra] (CSIRO), USDA-ARS, Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center, China Agricultural University (CAU), National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (2013AA100404), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271616, 31611130182, 41571088 and 31561143003), the National Research Foundation for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20120097110042), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), China Scholarship Council., IFPRI through the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight project, the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), the CGIAR Research Program on Wheat, the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP), Agricultural & Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida [Gainesville], Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn-Division of Plant Nutrition, Stanford University [Stanford], Écophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress environnementaux (LEPSE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), UMR : AGroécologie, Innovations, TeRritoires, Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Toulouse, Prince of Songkla University, Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Wageningen University and Research Center (WUR), China Agricultural University, Division of Plant Nutrition-University of Bonn, Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro), University of Florida, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research ( PIK ), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Institute for Landscape Biogeochemistry, Center for Climate Systems Research [New York] ( CCSR ), Écophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress environnementaux ( LEPSE ), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique ( INRA ) -Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques ( Montpellier SupAgro ) -Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier ( Montpellier SupAgro ), NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies ( GISS ), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center ( GSFC ), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research ( CGIAR ), W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Institute of Soil Ecology [Neuherberg] ( IBOE ), Helmholtz-Zentrum München ( HZM ), James Hutton Institute, Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Ispra] ( JRC ), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis ( IIASA ), Washington State University ( WSU ), Texas A and M University ( TAMU ), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Centre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture ( CESCRA ), Indian Agricultural Research Institute ( IARI ), Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung - Atmosphärische Umweltforschung ( IMK-IFU ), Karlsruher Institut für Technologie ( KIT ), School of Geography, Earth & Environmental Science and Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center ( CIMMYT ), Bonn Universität [Bonn], University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison [Madison], Wageningen University and Research Center ( WUR ), Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] ( CAS ), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Blaise Pascal - Clermont-Ferrand 2 (UBP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT), Helmholtz Zentrum München = German Research Center for Environmental Health, Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Georg-August-University = Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien = University of Natural Resources and Life [Vienne, Autriche] (BOKU), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), and Institute of geographical sciences and natural resources research [CAS] (IGSNRR)
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,[SDV.SA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences ,[ SDV.BV ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Vegetal Biology ,régression statistique ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,impact sur le rendement ,klim ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,incertitude ,wheat ,uncertainty ,[ SDV.SA ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences ,2. Zero hunger ,changement climatique ,Regression analysis ,statistical regression ,simulation ,PE&RC ,[ SDE.MCG ] Environmental Sciences/Global Changes ,sécurité alimentaire ,Plant Production Systems ,modèle de récolte ,Yield (finance) ,comparaison de modèles ,[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes ,Climate change ,Environmental Science (miscellaneous) ,Earth System Science ,blé ,température ,Life Science ,[SDV.BV]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Vegetal Biology ,réchauffement climatique ,global change ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Hydrology ,WIMEK ,Global temperature ,business.industry ,Crop yield ,Global warming ,Climate Resilience ,13. Climate action ,Agriculture ,Klimaatbestendigheid ,Plantaardige Productiesystemen ,Environmental science ,Leerstoelgroep Aardsysteemkunde ,Climate model ,business ,Social Sciences (miscellaneous) ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
The potential impact of global temperature change on global crop yield has recently been assessed with different methods. Here we show that grid-based and point-based simulations and statistical regressions (from historic records), without deliberate adaptation or CO2 fertilization effects, produce similar estimates of temperature impact on wheat yields at global and national scales. With a 1 °C global temperature increase, global wheat yield is projected to decline between 4.1% and 6.4%. Projected relative temperature impacts from different methods were similar for major wheat-producing countries China, India, USA and France, but less so for Russia. Point-based and grid-based simulations, and to some extent the statistical regressions, were consistent in projecting that warmer regions are likely to suffer more yield loss with increasing temperature than cooler regions. By forming a multi-method ensemble, it was possible to quantify ‘method uncertainty’ in addition to model uncertainty. This significantly improves confidence in estimates of climate impacts on global food security. The potential impact of global temperature change on global crop yield has recently been assessed with different methods. Here we show that grid-based and point-based simulations and statistical regressions (from historic records), without deliberate adaptation or CO2 fertilization effects, produce similar estimates of temperature impact on wheat yields at global and national scales. With a 1 °C global temperature increase, global wheat yield is projected to decline between 4.1% and 6.4%. Projected relative temperature impacts from different methods were similar for major wheat-producing countries China, India, USA and France, but less so for Russia. Point-based and grid-based simulations, and to some extent the statistical regressions, were consistent in projecting that warmer regions are likely to suffer more yield loss with increasing temperature than cooler regions. By forming a multi-method ensemble, it was possible to quantify ‘method uncertainty’ in addition to model uncertainty. This significantly improves confidence in estimates of climate impacts on global food security.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Hot spots of wheat yield decline with rising temperatures
- Author
-
Matthew P. Reynolds, Bruno Basso, David B. Lobell, Phillip D. Alderman, Kai Sonder, Davide Cammarano, Senthold Asseng, and Uran Chung
- Subjects
Irrigation ,Hot Temperature ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Climate change ,India ,01 natural sciences ,Environmental Chemistry ,Triticum ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,General Environmental Science ,Global and Planetary Change ,Food security ,Ecology ,High poverty ,Crop yield ,Temperature ,food and beverages ,Agriculture ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Limiting ,Relative yield ,Agronomy ,Yield (chemistry) ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Environmental science ,Edible Grain - Abstract
Many of the irrigated spring wheat regions in the world are also regions with high poverty. The impacts of temperature increase on wheat yield in regions of high poverty are uncertain. A grain yield–temperature response function combined with a quantification of model uncertainty was constructed using a multimodel ensemble from two key irrigated spring wheat areas (India and Sudan) and applied to all irrigated spring wheat regions in the world. Southern Indian and southern Pakistani wheat-growing regions with large yield reductions from increasing temperatures coincided with high poverty headcounts, indicating these areas as future food security ‘hot spots’. The multimodel simulations produced a linear absolute decline of yields with increasing temperature, with uncertainty varying with reference temperature at a location. As a consequence of the linear absolute yield decline, the relative yield reductions are larger in low-yielding environments (e.g., high reference temperature areas in southern India, southern Pakistan and all Sudan wheat-growing regions) and farmers in these regions will be hit hardest by increasing temperatures. However, as absolute yield declines are about the same in low- and high-yielding regions, the contributed deficit to national production caused by increasing temperatures is higher in high-yielding environments (e.g., northern India) because these environments contribute more to national wheat production. Although Sudan could potentially grow more wheat if irrigation is available, grain yields would be low due to high reference temperatures, with future increases in temperature further limiting production.
- Published
- 2016
23. Predicting Growth of Panicum maximum : An Adaptation of the CROPGRO–Perennial Forage Model
- Author
-
Carlos Guilherme Silveira Pedreira, Phillip D. Alderman, Bruno Carneiro e Pedreira, Kenneth J. Boote, Leonardo S. B. Moreno, and Márcio A. S. Lara
- Subjects
BOVINOS ,Perennial plant ,Agronomy ,biology ,Forage ,Adaptation ,biology.organism_classification ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Panicum - Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Carbohydrate and Nitrogen Reserves Relative to Regrowth Dynamics of ‘Tifton 85’ Bermudagrass as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization
- Author
-
Samuel W. Coleman, Phillip D. Alderman, Lynn E. Sollenberger, and Kenneth J. Boote
- Subjects
Canopy ,Cynodon ,Human fertilization ,Perennial plant ,Agronomy ,biology ,Shoot ,Leaf area index ,biology.organism_classification ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Tifton ,Rhizome - Abstract
Carbohydrate and N reserves are important for perennial grass regrowth after defoliation. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of N fertilization on dynamics of reserve accumulation and utilization for regrowth of a C 4 perennial grass. A field study was conducted at Gainesville, FL, on established 'Tifton 85' bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) in 2006 and 2007. Treatments were N rates of 0, 45, 90, and 135 kg N ha ―1 regrowth period ―1 . Total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC) and N concentrations, leaf area index (LAI), and canopy carbon exchange rate (CER) were measured weekly during 28-d regrowth periods. Stem and rhizome TNC concentrations decreased with increasing N rate, ranging from 20 to 80 mg g ―1 for stem and 45 to 145 mg g ―1 for rhizome, and followed quadratic time trends, with minima between 7 and 14 d of regrowth, suggesting reserve utilization up to 2 wk after defoliation. Leaf, stem, rhizome, and root N concentrations increased with N rate. Leaf and stem N concentrations followed quadratic time trends, with maxima between 7 and 14 d of regrowth, and ranged from 15 to 50 mg g ―1 for leaf and 10 to 40 mg g ―1 for stem. Rhizome N concentrations were constant throughout regrowth. Canopy CER and LAI followed logistic time trends within each 28-d regrowth period, with upper asymptotes raised by increased N rate. Nitrogen fertilization increased TNC reserve utilization, LAI, and canopy CER, thereby increasing shoot regrowth at rates up to 90 kg N ha ―1 period ―1 .
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Regrowth Dynamics of ‘Tifton 85’ Bermudagrass as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization
- Author
-
Kenneth J. Boote, Lynn E. Sollenberger, and Phillip D. Alderman
- Subjects
Crop ,Cynodon ,Human fertilization ,Agronomy ,Hay ,Tiller (botany) ,Poaceae ,Forage ,Biology ,biology.organism_classification ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Tifton - Abstract
'Tifton 85' bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) has been widely adopted as a forage and hay crop and is being considered as a cellulosic ethanol feedstock. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of N fertilization rate on Tifton 85 regrowth dynamics. A field study was conducted near Gainesville, FL, on established Tifton 85 in 2006 and 2007. The treatments were N rates of 0, 45, 90, and 135 kg N ha ―1 regrowth period ―1 . Tissue mass, leaf:stem ratio, and tiller number and mass were measured weekly during 28-d regrowth periods. Leaf mass followed logistic time trends with the upper asymptote varying between 50 and 225 g m ―2 depending on N rate and season (summer and autumn). Stem mass lagged behind leaf mass for 7 to 14 d, subsequently following linear or quadratic time trends to reach between 75 and 300 g m- 2 by 28 d. Increasing N rate from 0 to 135 kg ha ―1 period ―1 increased tiller mass at 28 d from 1.5 to 3 g tiller ―1 in summer and 1 to 1.5 g tiller ―1 in autumn. Leaf:stem ratio increased to 1.0 within 14 to 21 d, followed by a subsequent decrease. Rhizome and root mass were not affected by N fertilization. Increasing N rate primarily affected mass and proportion of above-ground plant parts, with little effect on mass of below-ground parts. Nitrogen nutrition index values were similar whether calculated from samples taken to a 10-cm stubble height or from samples taken to the soil surface. Regrowth was not enhanced by N rate beyond 90 kg N ha ―1 regrowth period ―1 .
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Adapting the CROPGRO perennial forage model to predict growth of Brachiaria brizantha
- Author
-
Phillip D. Alderman, Márcio A. S. Lara, Carlos Guilherme Silveira Pedreira, Bruno Carneiro e Pedreira, and Kenneth J. Boote
- Subjects
Biomass (ecology) ,biology ,Specific leaf area ,Agronomy ,Perennial plant ,Soil Science ,Dormancy ,Forage ,Crop simulation model ,biology.organism_classification ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Paspalum notatum ,Brachiaria - Abstract
Warm-season grasses are economically important for cattle production in tropical regions, and tools to aid in management and research of these forages would be highly beneficial. Crop simulation models synthesize numerous physiological processes and are important research tools for evaluating production of warm-season grasses. This research was conducted to adapt the perennial CROPGRO Forage model to simulate growth of the tropical species palisadegrass [ Brachiaria brizantha (A. Rich.) Stapf. cv. Xaraes] and to describe model adaptation for this species. In order to develop the CROPGRO parameters for this species, we began with values and relationships reported in the literature. Some parameters and relationships were calibrated by comparison with observed growth, development, dry matter accumulation and partitioning during a 2-year experiment with Xaraes palisadegrass in Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. Starting with parameters for the bahiagrass ( Paspalum notatum Flugge) perennial forage model, dormancy effects had to be minimized, and partitioning to storage tissue/root decreased, and partitioning to leaf and stem increased to provide for more leaf and stem growth and less root. Parameters affecting specific leaf area (SLA) and senescence of plant tissues were improved. After these changes were made to the model, biomass accumulation was better simulated, mean predicted herbage yield per cycle was 3573 kg ha −1 , with a RMSE of 538 kg DM ha −1 ( D -Stat = 0.838, simulated/observed ratio = 1.028). The results of the adaptation suggest that the CROPGRO model is an efficient tool to integrate physiological aspects of palisadegrass and can be used to simulate growth.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Author Correction: The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions
- Author
-
Margarita Garcia-Vila, Jordi Doltra, Jeffrey W. White, Fulu Tao, Leilei Liu, Christoph Müller, Davide Cammarano, Zhigan Zhao, Michael J. Ottman, Mikhail A. Semenov, Claudio O. Stöckle, Phillip D. Alderman, Benjamin Dumont, Joost Wolf, Sebastian Gayler, Alex C. Ruane, Daniel Wallach, Yan Zhu, Taru Palosuo, Andrew J. Challinor, Reimund P. Rötter, Katharina Waha, Thilo Streck, Pierre Martre, Pramod K. Aggarwal, Christian Biernath, Frank Ewert, Gerard W. Wall, Jakarat Anothai, Elias Fereres, Andrea Maiorano, Zhimin Wang, Iwan Supit, Giacomo De Sanctis, Senthold Asseng, Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei, Garry O'Leary, Eckart Priesack, Iurii Shcherbak, Claas Nendel, Curtis D. Jones, Matthew P. Reynolds, Enli Wang, Bruce A. Kimball, L. A. Hunt, Roberto C. Izaurralde, Peter J. Thorburn, Soora Naresh Kumar, Bruno Basso, Mohamed Jabloun, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Jørgen E. Olesen, Kurt Christian Kersebaum, Dominique Ripoche, Pierre Stratonovitch, and Ann-Kristin Koehler
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,2. Zero hunger ,WIMEK ,Water and Food ,Crop yield ,Published Erratum ,Water en Voedsel ,Plant Science ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,Statistics ,Centre for Crop Systems Analysis ,Life Science ,Water Systems and Global Change ,Temperature response ,Mathematics - Abstract
Nature Plants 3, 17102 (2017); published online 17 July 2017; corrected online 27 September 2017.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Climate change impact and adaptation in agricultural systems
- Author
-
Kindie Tesfaye, Kai Sonder, Phillip D. Alderman, Clare M. Stirling, U. Chung, Bram Govaerts, Jill E. Cairns, Jon Hellin, Matthew P. Reynolds, Tadele Tefera, E. Silverblatt-Buser, Sika Gbegbelegbe, H. Ngugi, Nele Verhulst, and Rachael Cox
- Subjects
Food security ,Intensive crop farming ,Crop production ,Agroforestry ,Agriculture ,business.industry ,Sustainability ,Environmental science ,Developing country ,Production (economics) ,business ,Cropping - Abstract
This book contains 17 chapters focusing on the impacts of climate change on ecosystems, food security, water resources and economic stability. Strategies to develop sustainable systems that minimize impact on climate and/or mitigate the effects of human activity on climate change are also presented.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production
- Author
-
Margarita Garcia-Vila, L. A. Hunt, Jørgen E. Olesen, P. V. V. Prasad, Pierre Martre, Katharina Waha, Curtis D. Jones, Pramod K. Aggarwal, Yan Zhu, Phillip D. Alderman, Christian Biernath, Fulu Tao, Bruno Basso, Davide Cammarano, Christoph Müller, Eckart Priesack, Taru Palosuo, Mohamed Jabloun, Thilo Streck, Zhigan Zhao, Jordi Doltra, Roberto C. Izaurralde, Alex C. Ruane, Andrew J. Challinor, Michael J. Ottman, Jeffrey W. White, Garry O'Leary, Reimund P. Rötter, David B. Lobell, Sebastian Gayler, Gerard W. Wall, G. De Sanctis, Matthew P. Reynolds, Senthold Asseng, Iurii Shcherbak, Peter J. Thorburn, Enli Wang, Bruce A. Kimball, Daniel Wallach, Mikhail A. Semenov, Claudio O. Stöckle, Claas Nendel, Jakarat Anothai, Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei, Pierre Stratonovitch, Ann-Kristin Koehler, Joost Wolf, Kurt Christian Kersebaum, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Frank Ewert, Iwan Supit, S. Naresh Kumar, Elias Fereres, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Columbia University, University of Florida, Department of Agriculture (US), Oregon State University, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Shahid Beheshti University, ARVALIS, International Food Policy Research Institute (US), Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany), German Research Foundation, Danish Council for Strategic Research, Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (Germany), Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, National Natural Science Foundation of China, CGIAR (France), Grains Research and Development Corporation (Australia), Department of Environment and Primary Industries (Australia), Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (Australia), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering [Gainesville] (UF|ABE), Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences [Gainesville] (UF|IFAS), University of Florida [Gainesville] (UF)-University of Florida [Gainesville] (UF), Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation [Bonn] (INRES), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Génétique Diversité et Ecophysiologie des Céréales (GDEC), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Blaise Pascal - Clermont-Ferrand 2 (UBP), Plant Production Research, Agrifood Research Finland, Stanford University, Agricultural Research Service / US Arid Land Agricultural Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, The School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR] (CGIAR), Department of Agronomy, Purdue University [West Lafayette], CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Washington State University (WSU), Department of geological sciences, Michigan State University [East Lansing], Michigan State University System-Michigan State University System, W. K. Kellogg Biological Station (KBS), Institute of Soil Ecology, Helmholtz-Zentrum München (HZM), CGIAR-ESSP Program on Climate Change,Agriculture and Food Security, International Center for Tropical Agriculture, University of Leeds, Agroclim (AGROCLIM), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Catabrian Agricultural Research and Training Center (CIFA), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad de Córdoba [Cordoba], WESS-Water and Earth System Science Competence Cluster, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen = Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Biological Systems Engineering, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland [College Park], University of Maryland System-University of Maryland System, Texas A&M University System, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University [Aarhus], Institute of Landscape System Analysis, Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung = Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Centre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture (CESCRA), Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), Institute of landscape systems analysis, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Computational and Systems Biology Department, Rothamsted Research, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan [Ann Arbor], University of Michigan System-University of Michigan System, Computational and Systems Biology, John Innes Centre [Norwich], Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Plant Production Systems and Earth System Science, Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Institute of geographical sciences and natural resources research, Chinese Academy of Sciences [Changchun Branch] (CAS), Agriculture Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation [Canberra] (CSIRO), AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires (AGIR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Department of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University (CAU), Nanjing Agricultural University, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), USDA National Institute for Food and Agriculture [32011-68002-30191], KULUNDA [01LL0905L], FACCE MACSUR project through the German FederalMinistry of Education and Research (BMBF) [031A103B, 2812ERA115], German Science Foundation [EW119/5-1], FACCEMACSUR project by the Danish Strategic Research Council, FACCE MACSUR project through the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL), FACCE MACSUR project funded through the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, National Natural Science Foundation of China [41071030], Helmholtz project 'REKLIM-Regional Climate Change: Causes and Effects' Topic 9: 'Climate Change and Air Quality', CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food Security (CCAFS), Australian Grains Research and Development Corporation, Department of Environment and Primary Industries Victoria, Australia, Texas AgriLife Research, Texas AM University, CSIRO, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Helmholtz Zentrum München = German Research Center for Environmental Health, Universidad de Córdoba = University of Córdoba [Córdoba], Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)-Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Institute of geographical sciences and natural resources research [CAS] (IGSNRR), Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] (CAS), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT), and Nanjing Agricultural University (NAU)
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Yield (finance) ,Growing season ,Climate change ,Environmental Science (miscellaneous) ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences ,Crop ,[SDV.BV]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Vegetal Biology ,Production (economics) ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,2. Zero hunger ,business.industry ,Global warming ,Simulation modeling ,15. Life on land ,Agronomy ,13. Climate action ,Agriculture ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,business ,Social Sciences (miscellaneous) ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
Asseng, S. et al., Crop models are essential tools for assessing the threat of climate change to local and global food production1. Present models used to predict wheat grain yield are highly uncertain when simulating how crops respond to temperature2. Here we systematically tested 30 different wheat crop models of the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project against field experiments in which growing season mean temperatures ranged from 15 °C to 32 °C, including experiments with artificial heating. Many models simulated yields well, but were less accurate at higher temperatures. The model ensemble median was consistently more accurate in simulating the crop temperature response than any single model, regardless of the input information used. Extrapolating the model ensemble temperature response indicates that warming is already slowing yield gains at a majority of wheat-growing locations. Global wheat production is estimated to fall by 6% for each °C of further temperature increase and become more variable over space and time., We thank the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project and its leaders C. Rosenzweig from NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Columbia University (USA), J. Jones from University of Florida (USA), J. Hatfield from United States Department of Agriculture (USA) and J. Antle from Oregon State University (USA) for support. We also thank M. Lopez from CIMMYT (Turkey), M. Usman Bashir from University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (Pakistan), S. Soufizadeh from Shahid Beheshti University (Iran), and J. Lorgeou and J-C. Deswarte from ARVALIS—Institut du Végétal (France) for assistance with selecting key locations and quantifying regional crop cultivars, anthesis and maturity dates and R. Raymundo for assistance with GIS. S.A. and D.C. received financial support from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). C.S. was funded through USDA National Institute for Food and Agriculture award 32011-68002-30191. C.M. received financial support from the KULUNDA project (01LL0905L) and the FACCE MACSUR project (031A103B) funded through the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). F.E. received support from the FACCE MACSUR project (031A103B) funded through the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2812ERA115) and E.E.R. was funded through the German Science Foundation (project EW 119/5-1). M.J. and J.E.O. were funded through the FACCE MACSUR project by the Danish Strategic Research Council. K.C.K. and C.N. were funded by the FACCE MACSUR project through the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL). F.T., T.P. and R.P.R. received financial support from FACCE MACSUR project funded through the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MMM); F.T. was also funded through National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41071030). C.B. was funded through the Helmholtz project ‘REKLIM—Regional Climate Change: Causes and Effects’ Topic 9: ‘Climate Change and Air Quality’. M.P.R. and P.D.A. received funding from the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food Security (CCAFS). G.O’L. was funded through the Australian Grains Research and Development Corporation and the Department of Environment and Primary Industries Victoria, Australia. R.C.I. was funded by Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University. E.W. and Z.Z. were funded by CSIRO and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) through the research project ‘Advancing crop yield while reducing the use of water and nitrogen’ and by the CSIRO-MoE PhD Research Program.
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Improving Crop Adaptation to Climate Change through Strategic Crossing of Stress Adaptive Traits
- Author
-
Gemma Molero, Maria Tattaris, Phillip D. Alderman, Sivakumar Sukumaran, C.M. Cossani, and Matthew P. Reynolds
- Subjects
education.field_of_study ,biology ,business.industry ,Physiology ,Population ,Climate change ,food and beverages ,phenomics ,Quantitative trait locus ,biology.organism_classification ,Biotechnology ,remote sensing ,Phenomics ,breeding ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Adaptation ,education ,Triticeae ,Association mapping ,business ,Selection (genetic algorithm) ,General Environmental Science - Abstract
Crossing programs based on phenomics have resulted in a new generation of drought adapted wheat lines based on strategic crossing of complementary physiological traits (PT) that have been included in CIMMYT's international distribution system since 2010. New PT lines have shown superior performance over conventional material in most international environments. For example, in the 17th SAWYT the average yield of PT lines was larger than the group of conventionally bred lines at 75% of international sites. This ongoing effort has involved broadening the genetic base of conventional wheat genepools through extensive use of genetic resources, including landraces and products of inter-specific hybridization with members of the Triticeae tribe. One of the prerequisites for successful application of phenomics in breeding is the establishment of reliable screening tools and platforms that can precisely measure expression of physiological traits in realistic field environments. Genetic gains associated with selection for canopy temperature and spectral water indices have shown that such remotely sensed traits can serve as proxies that reliably estimate water relations characteristics impacting on yield. The first aerial remote sensing platforms for large scale genetic resource screening was developed at CIMMYT in Mexico and more than half of the accessions of the World Wheat Collection have been screened. These high throughput field phenotyping tools have application in gene discovery and QTL for both drought and heat adaptive traits have been identified on 4 different chromosomes of the Seri/Babax RILs population, showing for the first time a common genetic basis for these key abiotic stresses. Similarly the phenology- controlled ‘Wheat Association Mapping Initiative’ panel has been used for gene discovery work. To define the best constellation of traits for application in breeding -and determine priorities for genetic understanding- it is necessary to develop conceptual models of adaptive traits that highlight wheat's genetic limitations under water limitation; pre-breeding serves as a practical tool to test different models.
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.