Search

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The initial STOMP and ORIOLE trial reports suggested that metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) was associated with improved treatment outcomes. Here, we present long-term outcomes of MDT in omCSPC by pooling STOMP and ORIOLE and assess the ability of a high-risk mutational signature to risk stratify outcomes after MDT. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. High-risk mutations were defined as pathogenic somatic mutations within ATM, BRCA1/2, Rb1, or TP53. The median follow-up for the whole group was 52.5 months. Median PFS was prolonged with MDT compared with observation (pooled hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.66; P value < .001), with the largest benefit of MDT in patients with a high-risk mutation (HR high-risk, 0.05; HR no high-risk, 0.42; P value for interaction: .12). Within the MDT cohort, the PFS was 13.4 months in those without a high-risk mutation, compared with 7.5 months in those with a high-risk mutation (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.25 to 1.11; P = .09). Long-term outcomes from the only two randomized trials in omCSPC suggest a sustained clinical benefit to MDT over observation. A high-risk mutational signature may help risk stratify treatment outcomes after MDT. ispartof: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY vol:40 issue:29 pages:3377-+ ispartof: location:United States status: published

Standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) (stage II/III) includes preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) followed by resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a new treatment paradigm that delivers systemic therapy prior to CRT aimed at improving outcomes for high-risk patients. Here we analyzed the national cancer database (NCDB) comparing short-term post-operative outcomes between patients receiving TNT and CRT. The NCDB was queried to identify patients with LARC between the 2004 and 2014 treated with TNT or CRT. Primary outcomes included post-operative 30-day mortality and readmissions between TNT and CRT which were analyzed via logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included post-operative length of stay (LOS) and OS which were compared with two-tailed t-test and Kaplan-Meier with log rank testing, respectively. A total of 9066 patients met inclusion criteria with a median age at diagnosis that was 57 years (IQR, 19–65); 62.3% were male and 87.8% white. Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of either standard CRT (97.2%) or TNT (2.8%). Patients treated at academic programs and those with N1 [p

Our ability to prognosticate the clinical course of patients with cancer has historically been limited to clinical, histopathological, and radiographic features. It has long been clear however, that these data alone do not adequately capture the heterogeneity and breadth of disease trajectories experienced by patients. The advent of efficient genomic sequencing has led to a revolution in cancer care as we try to understand and personalize treatment specific to patient clinico-genomic phenotypes. Within prostate cancer, emerging evidence suggests that tumor genomics (e.g., DNA, RNA, and epigenetics) can be utilized to inform clinical decision making. In addition to providing discriminatory information about prognosis, it is likely tumor genomics also hold a key in predicting response to oncologic therapies which could be used to further tailor treatment recommendations. Herein we review select literature surrounding the use of tumor genomics within the management of prostate cancer, specifically leaning toward analytically validated and clinically tested genomic biomarkers utilized in radiotherapy and/or adjunctive therapies given with radiotherapy.

199 Background: Contained within the spectrum of metastatic cancer is an oligometastatic state where metastases are limited in number. Recent prospective data have shown that metastasis directed therapy (MDT) can alter the natural history of oligometastatic disease. In hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC), the positive clinical effect of MDT has been observed by the phase II STOMP and ORIOLE trials. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are a likely origin of the formation of macroscopic metastases. CTCs thus may provide an approach for identifying subgroups of patients with oligometastatic HSPC (oligoHSPC) that would benefit most from MDT. Our main goal was to evaluate the association between presence of CTCs at baseline or day 180 with clinical outcomes in the ORIOLE trial. Methods: ORIOLE was a phase II trial randomizing men with recurrent oligoHSPC with 1-3 metastases to observation (Obs) versus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) MDT. Blood samples were prospectively collected at baseline and day 180. Progression-free survival (PFS) was a composite endpoint including any of the following: a PSA rise of at least 2 ng/dL and 25% above nadir; radiologic progression by CT, MRI or bone scan (RECIST v1.1); symptomatic progression of disease; initiation of ADT; or death. Patient blood samples were shipped for analysis on Epic Sciences liquid biopsy platform (Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA). Machine learning algorithms identified CTCs and characterized androgen receptor (AR) expression. Comparisons of patient and tumor characteristics between the groups were performed by two-sample t-tests. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and p-values were calculated using log-rank test. Analysis was performed using SPSS version 28. Results: A total of 82 samples were collected: 70 from the SABR arm (35 baseline and 35 on day 180) and 12 Obs (7 baseline and 5 on day 180). CTCs were detected in 30/42 samples at baseline (71%, AR+= 7) and in 26/40 samples on day 180 (65%, AR+= 9). In the SABR group there was no difference between CTC+ versus CTC- and AR + versus AR- groups for PSA evaluated at baseline, day 90 or day 180 or Gleason score. With a median follow-up of 41.7 months, PFS was significantly lower in the patients with AR+ versus AR- CTCs at baseline in the SABR arm (p = 0.011, mean PFS: AR+ = 9.3 months, AR- = 27.1 months). The mean biochemical failure-free survival was AR+= 12.9 versus AR-= 29.2 months (p = 0.058). Conclusions: Our preliminary results demonstrate an association between AR+ CTCs at baseline and Day 180 with clinical outcomes following SABR MDT in oligoHSPC. This is the first report examining baseline and dynamic presence of CTCs in oligoHSPC treated from a prospective randomized trial of SABR. Longer follow-up, further analysis and a greater number of patients are needed for a more comprehensive conclusion.

TPS275 Background: It is now recognized that some patients with “oligo,” or few sites of metastases, may have the potential to completely eradicate their disease with aggressive local therapy. There are recent encouraging randomized prospective data for total consolidation of macroscopic metastases through treatment intensification involving metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). Hypotheses include that radiation to primary prostate tumor and metastatic sites affects the natural history of metastasis by virtue of radiation effects on cancer cell autonomous pathways and tumor microenvironment/normal tissue pathways. This study aims to evaluate the utility of the addition of MDT to the evolving standard of care treatment for de novo low volume metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients. This study will evaluate the efficacy of best systemic therapy (BST) and primary prostate radiation (XRT) versus BST, XRT and stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) MDT. Discovery correlatives associated with clinical outcome will be assessed by collection of including, but not limited to: circulating tumor cells, immunologic biomarkers, microbiota and radiomics. Methods: This study is a multi-site, non-blinded, randomized Phase II trial in patients with oligometastatic PCa. Men with de novo histologically confirmed (at any site) oligometastatic PCa (75.6 Gy to the prostate. BST will allow standard and intensified androgen blockade. The trial will evaluate the addition of SABR MDT and explore several translational and imaging correlatives. Subjects who meet eligibility criteria and qualify for enrollment will be stratified according to: (i) hormonal therapy vs intensified hormonal therapy; (ii) XRT vs XRT + primary prostate boost, and (iii) absence vs presence of bone metastasis. This study has been approved and began accrual on October 3rd, 2022, the Clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05223803. We assume an accrual time of 24 months, with 24 months of additional follow-up time, and will randomize a total of 122 patients (61 patients in each arm). The primary endpoint with be to assess 2-year failure-free survival (FFS). Secondary endpoints will include toxicity, quality of life (QoL), time to locoregional progression, time to distant progression, time to new metastasis, radiographic progression-free survival, and duration of response. Clinical trial information: NCT05223803 .

238 Background: Oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) represents an early state along the progression of metastatic disease in which patients experience improved outcomes compared to those with higher disease burden. Despite the generally more indolent nature, much heterogeneity still exists with some patients experiencing a more aggressive clinical course unexplained by clinical features alone. Here we correlate tumor genomics with modes of progression (MOP) and patterns of failure (POF) following treatment for omCSPC. Methods: We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective study of men treated for metachronous omCSPC, who underwent tumor next generation sequencing (NGS) with at least 1 year of follow-up. Descriptive POF and MOP were reported with respect to presence of genomic alterations in pathways of interest. Genomic pathways of interest included TP53, SPOP, WNT ( APC, CTNNB1, RNF43), DNA double strand break repair, cell cycle genes ( Rb1, CCND1–3, CDKN1B, and CDKN2A), and PI3K/AKT/mTOR. MOP were defined as oligoprogression (1-3 lesions), polyprogression (≥4 lesions), or long-term control (LTC, no radiographic progression at last follow-up). POF included location of lesions at first failure. Overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Genomic associations with patterns/modes of failure were compared with chi-square test. Results: 221 patients were included for analysis with the majority having either 1 (47.5%) or 2 (27.3%) metastatic lesions at oligometastasis. 5-yr OS was associated with MOP 92% vs 89% vs 69% (p

5011 Background: Emerging data suggest metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) improves outcomes in patients with oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) can detect occult metastatic disease and has been proposed as a biomarker for treatment response. Herein we identify and validate a PSMA-PET biomarker for clinical outcomes following MDT in omCSPC. Methods: This was an international multi-institutional retrospective study of two completely independent cohorts of men with omCSPC, defined as ≤3 lesions, treated with metastasis-directed stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) who underwent PSMA-PET/CT prior to and 3-6 months after treatment. Pre- and post-SABR PSMA-PET/CT standardized uptake value (SUV) was measured for all lesions and PSMA response defined discretely using a cutpoint of ≥ 30% decrease in SUVmax. PSMA-PET response was correlated with lesion local control (LLC), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) defined using conventional and PET imaging, and metastasis-free survival (MFS) defined by conventional imaging alone. Results: A total of 131 patients with 261 treated metastases were included in the analysis, with median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 18.5-41.3). Following SABR, 78.4% of lesions experienced a partial or complete PSMA response. Multivariable analysis demonstrated SUV response significantly associated with improved LLC (HR = 9.97, 95%CI 3.92-25.4; p < 0.01). Patients with PSMA response in all lesions experienced significantly better rPFS (HR = 0.49, 95%CI 0.26-0.92; p = 0.03) compared to their counterparts and this maintained significance within both the discovery (p < 0.01) and validation (p = 0.01) cohorts. Within the discovery cohort, patients with PSMA response in all lesions also experienced significantly improved MFS (HR = 0.24, 95%CI 0.07-0.85; p = 0.03); analysis of the independent validation cohort is ongoing. Conclusions: Following SABR, PSMA-PET response is a robust and externally validated radiographic biomarker for rPFS and appears to be associated with MFS pending validation. This approach holds promise for guiding clinical management of omCSPC.