Search

Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder affecting neuromuscular junctions, leading to fluctuating muscle weakness. While many patients respond well to standard immunosuppression, a substantial subgroup faces ongoing disease activity. Emerging treatments such as complement factor C5 inhibition (C5IT) and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) antagonism hold promise for these patients. However, the current landscape is hindered by a paucity of comparative data that is crucial for treatment decisions., Objective: This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of C5IT and FcRn antagonists in a real-world setting., Methods: A retrospective analysis of 153 MG patients from 8 German specialised MG centres receiving either C5IT (26 eculizumab, 80 ravulizumab) or efgartigimod (47 patients) was conducted. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to compare changes in MG-specific outcome parameters within the first 6 months after treatment initiation, along with safety profiles and concomitant MG therapy., Results: Both treatment strategies led to rapid clinical improvements and substantial reductions in prednisolone doses. However, insufficient response was noted in 20%-49.1% of patients based on Quantitative MG and MG Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores. We did not identify any new safety concerns. After PSM, 40 patients remained in each group. In both cohorts, reductions in MG-ADL as prespecified primary study endpoint were comparable. Moreover, analyses of secondary outcome parameters demonstrated similar results for C5IT versus FcRn., Conclusion: In contrast to current meta-analyses and indirect comparisons of clinical trial data, our real-world study demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety of C5IT and FcRn antagonism in MG., Competing Interests: Competing interests: NH received honoraria for lecturing meetings from Argenx, Merck and Viatris; travel reimbursements and meeting attendance fees from Alexion, Argenx, Merck and Novartis. CN received speaker and travel fees from UCB, ArgenX, Alexion and Merck. FS received travel/accommodation/meeting expenses from Alexion Pharmaceuticals and argnx and received speaking honoria and honoria for attendance at advisory boards from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, argnx and UCB pharma and received research grants from Alexion Pharmaceuticals and Octapharma. SH has received received speaker' s honoraria and honoraria for attendance at advisory boards from Alexion. Argenx, Roche, UCB and Grifols and research funding from Argenx and Janssen. CS-G received speaker‘s and consulting honoraria from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Amicus Therapeutics, Argenx, Hormosan Pharma, Immunovant, Janssen, Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and UCB Pharma ravel and a travel grant from Alexion. SP received travel grants from Sanofi, Roche Pharma and Merck Healthcare, lecturing honoraria and consulting fees from Sanofi, Mylan, Novartis, Merck Healthcare, Biogen, Hexal, Alexion, Roche Pharma and research support from Diamed, Merck, Biogen, Novartis and the German Multiple Sclerosis Society North-Rhine-Westphalia of interests. HHK received honoraria for lecturing and consulting fees from Argenx, Alexion, UCB, Sanofi and Roche, travel grants from Alexion and Grifols, and research funding from ArgenX and Roche. FFK received compensation for travelling and lectures from Alexion, Merck and Novartis and is a Hannover Medical School-funded and German Research Foundation (DFG)-funded fellow as part of the Clinician Scientist Program (PRACTIS) at Hannover Medical School. MP received honoraria for lecturing from Argenx, Alexion. He received research funding from ArgenX. SG received honoraria for lecturing from Agrenx and travel and congress fees from Grifols. SG received honoraria for lecturing from Agrenx and travel and congress fees from Grifols. JZ has received payments for advisory boards, speakers honoraria, travel expenses, research projects from Alnylam, Biogen, Biotest, CSL Behring, Octapharma, Kedrion, Grifols, UCB, Hormosan, Alexion and Sanofi. TH received research support from Biogen, Novartis GeneTherapies, Roche and Sanofi Genzyme, speakers and consultant honoraria from Biogen, Hormosan, Roche, Alexion, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Alnylam and Argenx. SGM received honoraria for lecturing and travel expenses for attending meetings from Almirall, Amicus Therapeutics Germany, Bayer Health Care, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Diamed, Sanofi-Aventis, MedDay, Merck Serono, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, ONO Pharma, Roche, Chugai Pharma, QuintilesIMS and Teva. His research is funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Else Kroener Fresenius Foundation, Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA), German Academic Exchange Service, Hertie Foundation, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Studies (IZKF) Muenster, German Foundation Neurology and by Alexion, Almirall, Amicus Therapeutics Germany, Biogen Idec, Diamed, Fresenius Medical Care, Sanofi-Aventis, HERZ Burgdorf, Merck Serono, Novartis, ONOPharma, Roche, and Teva. AM has received speaker or consultancy honoraria or financial research support (paid to his institution) from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, argenx, Axunio, Desitin, Grifols, Hormosan Pharma, Janssen, Merck, Octapharma, UCB, and Xcenda. He serves as medical advisory board chairman of the German Myasthenia Gravis Society. TR reports grants from the German Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology, grants and personal fees from Sanofi-Aventis and Alexion, personal fees from Biogen Idec, Roche and Teva, and personal fees and nonfinancial support from Merck Serono, outside the submitted work. LG, MH, MÖ, CBS, CS, TS, VS and AT report no conflicts of interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) haploinsufficiency is a rare genetic condition characterized by development of immune cytopenia, hypogammaglobulinemia, and/or lymphoproliferative disorder, as well as multiple autoimmunity. Treatment with abatacept was shown to alleviate autoimmune conditions, yet its long-lasting impact on bone marrow function remains undetermined., Methods: We here present the case of a now 39-year-old woman with CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency with predominant CNS affection, yet multiorgan autoimmunity and lymphopenia. We conducted single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of peripheral mononuclear blood cells before and after abatacept induction., Results: After several high-efficacy immunosuppressive treatments with little-to-no response, she started abatacept in 2017 and experienced ongoing remission including resolution of pre-existing immune cytopenia and hypogammaglobulinemia. Using scRNA-seq, we were able to demonstrate reconstitution of peripheral B cells accompanied by reduction of CD8 + T cells. CD4 + and CD8 + T cells were characterized by downregulation of pathways involved in activation of innate immune cells., Discussion: Our findings demonstrate long-lasting resolution of lymphopenia after abatacept treatment in CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency despite severity and duration of symptoms. Thus, abatacept should be considered throughout before stem cell transplantation also in CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency with severe symptoms., Classification of Evidence: As a single report without controls, this report provides class IV evidence that abatacept might revert lymphopenia in patients with CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency.

Objective: B-cell-depletion via CD20 antibodies is a safe and effective treatment for active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Both ocrelizumab (OCR) and ofatumumab (OFA) have demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials and are approved for treatment of RMS, yet nothing is known on their comparative effectiveness, especially in the real-world setting., Methods: This prospective cohort study includes patients that were started on either OCR or OFA between September 2021 and December 2023. Patients were followed until June 2024 and recruited at 3 large tertiary centers in Germany (Duesseldorf, Essen, and Giessen). Propensity-score-matching was used to address baseline imbalances among patients. Clinical relapses, presence of new or enlarging MRI lesions and 6-month confirmed disability worsening were evaluated. Non-inferiority of OFA compared to OCR was evaluated through comparison of Kaplan-Meier-estimates., Results: A total of 1,138 patients were initially enrolled in the cohort. Following patient selection and propensity-score-matching, 544 OCR and 417 OFA patients were included in the final analysis. In our primary analysis, OFA was non-inferior to OCR in terms of relapses, disability progression, and accrual of MRI lesions. Subgroup analyses confirmed findings in previously naïve and platform-treated patients. Potential differences between OFA and OCR were seen in patients switching from S1P receptor modulators or natalizumab., Conclusion: We here provide comparative data on the effectiveness of OCR and OFA in patients with active RMS. OFA was non-inferior to OCR in the overall cohort. Potential differences observed in patients switching from S1P receptor modulators or natalizumab require further validation. ANN NEUROL 2024., (© 2024 The Author(s). Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Background and Objectives: Relapse and MRI activity usually decline with aging but are replaced by progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). However, several older PwMS continue to experience clinical relapses, and the impact on their disease remains undetermined. We aimed to determine the impact of an index relapse on disease outcomes in patients older than 50 years and to identify risk factors of disadvantageous outcomes., Methods: We performed a secondary analysis from 3 prospective cohorts in Germany. We evaluated all PwMS 50 years and older with a relapse ≤60 days before a baseline visit and at least 18 months of follow-up compared with a control cohort of PwMS without a relapse. Patients were stratified according to age ("50-54" vs "55-59" vs "60+") or disease outcomes ("stable" vs "active" vs "progressive," according to the Lublin criteria). We analyzed relapses, MRI activity, relapse-associated worsening, and PIRA. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of specific baseline risk factors and treatment regimen changes with disease outcomes at month 18., Results: A total of 681 patients were included in the "relapse cohort" (50+: 361; 55+: 220; 60+: 100). The "control cohort" comprised 232 patients (50+: 117; 55+: 71; 60+: 44). Baseline epidemiologic parameters were balanced among cohorts and subgroups. We observed increased abundance of inflammatory activity and relapse-independent disability progression in the "relapse" vs "control" cohort. In the "relapse" cohort, we identified 273 patients as "stable" (59.7%), 114 patients as "active" (24.9%), and 70 patients as "progressive" (15.3%) during follow-up. Cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and older age at baseline were identified as risk factors of progressive, whereas disease-modifying treatment (DMT) administration at baseline favored stable disease. DMT during follow-up was associated with stable over active, but not over progressive disease., Discussion: A relapse-suggesting underlying active disease-in PwMS older than 50 years was associated with continued disease activity and increased risk of PIRA. Presence of CVRF and absence of DMT at baseline appeared as risk factors of disadvantageous disease courses. An escalation of DMT switch was associated with stable over active but not progressive disease.

Background: Therapist-guided exposure and response prevention (ERP) for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is frequently conducted within clinical settings but rarely at places where patients are usually confronted with OCD symptom-provoking situations in daily life (eg, at home)., Objective: This study aimed to investigate patients' views on 1 ERP session at home via videoconference and its impact on treatment outcome., Methods: A total of 64 inpatients with OCD received 1 session of therapist-guided videoconference-based ERP at home in adjunction to a multimodal inpatient treatment between 2015 and 2020., Results: Compared with 64 age- and sex-matched controls who received a multimodal inpatient treatment without 1 session of videoconference-based ERP at home, patients who received 1 session of videoconference-based ERP in adjunction to a multimodal inpatient treatment showed stronger reductions in OCD symptom severity from admission to discharge. Before the videoconference-based ERP session, patients reported high rationale credibility and treatment expectancy. After the videoconference-based ERP session, patients reported medium-to-high positive mood as well as depth and smoothness of the session, and they perceived the working alliance as high., Conclusions: Results highlight the importance of administering therapist-guided ERP sessions in patients' natural environment to enhance treatment response in OCD. Videoconference-based ERP as add-on to treatment as usual is, therefore, a promising approach to facilitate the application of ERP in patients' natural environment and foster the generalization of ERP conducted in clinical settings., (©Ulrich Voderholzer, Adrian Meule, Stefan Koch, Simone Pfeuffer, Anna-Lena Netter, Dirk Lehr, Eva Maria Zisler. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (https://mental.jmir.org), 13.03.2024.)

K 2P 2.1 (TREK1), a two-pore domain potassium channel, has emerged as regulator of leukocyte transmigration into the central nervous system. In the context of skeletal muscle, immune cell infiltration constitutes the pathogenic hallmark of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). However, the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. In this study, we investigated the role of K 2P 2.1 in the autoimmune response of IIMs. We detected K 2P 2.1 expression in primary skeletal muscle and endothelial cells of murine and human origin. We observed an increased pro-inflammatory cell response, adhesion and transmigration by pharmacological blockade or genetic deletion of K 2P 2.1 in vitro and in in vivo myositis mouse models. Of note, our findings were not restricted to endothelial cells as skeletal muscle cells with impaired K 2P 2.1 function also demonstrated a strong pro-inflammatory response. Conversely, these features were abrogated by activation of K 2P 2.1 and improved the disease course of a myositis mouse model. In humans, K 2P 2.1 expression was diminished in IIM patients compared to non-diseased controls arguing for the translatability of our findings. In summary, K 2P 2.1 may regulate the inflammatory response of skeletal muscle. Further research is required to understand whether K 2P 2.1 could serve as novel therapeutic target., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Cladribine has been approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) and its administration results in a long-lasting depletion of lymphocytes. As lymphopenia is known to hamper immune responses to vaccination, we evaluated the immunogenicity of the influenza vaccine in patients undergoing cladribine treatment at different stages vs. controls. The antibody response in 90 cladribine-treated MS patients was prospectively compared with 10 control subjects receiving platform immunotherapy (NCT05019248). Serum samples were collected before and six months after vaccination. Response to vaccination was determined by the hemagglutination-inhibition test. Postvaccination seroprotection rates against influenza A were comparable in cladribine-treated patients and controls (H1N1: 94.4% vs. 100%; H3N2: 92.2% vs. 90.0%). Influenza B response was lower in the cladribine cohort (61.1% vs. 80%). The increase in geometric mean titers was lower in the cladribine group vs. controls (H1N1: +98.5 vs. +188.1; H3N2: +225.3 vs. +300.0; influenza B: +40.0 vs. +78.4); however, titers increased in both groups for all strains. Seroprotection was achieved irrespective of vaccination timing and lymphocyte subset counts at the time of vaccination in the cladribine cohort. To conclude, cladribine-treated MS patients can mount an adequate immune response to influenza independently of treatment duration and time interval to the last cladribine administration.

Background and Objectives: B cell-depleting antibodies were proven as effective strategy for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). The monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab was approved in 2017 in the United States and in 2018 in the European Union, but despite proven efficacy in randomized, controlled clinical trials, its effectiveness in the real-world setting remains to be fully elucidated. In particular, most study patients were treatment naive or switched from injectable therapies, whereas oral substances or monoclonal antibodies made up >1% of previous treatments., Methods: We evaluated ocrelizumab-treated patients with RMS enrolled in the prospective cohorts at the University Hospitals Duesseldorf and Essen, Germany. Epidemiologic data at baseline were compared, and Cox proportional hazard models were applied to evaluate outcomes., Results: Two hundred eighty patients were included (median age: 37 years, 35% male patients). Compared with using ocrelizumab as a first-line treatment, its use as a third-line therapy increased hazard ratios (HRs) for relapse and disability progression, whereas differences between first- vs second-line and second- vs third-line remained smaller. We stratified patients according to their last previous disease-modifying treatment and here identified fingolimod (FTY) (45 patients, median age 40 years, 33% male patients) as a relevant risk factor for ongoing relapse activity despite 2nd-line (HR: 3.417 [1.007-11.600]) or 3rd-line (HR: 5.903 [2.489-13.999]) ocrelizumab treatment, disability worsening (2nd line: HR: 3.571 [1.013-12.589]; 3rd line: HR: 4.502 [1.728-11.729]), and occurrence of new/enlarging MRI lesions (2nd line: HR: 1.939 [0.604-6.228]; 3rd line: HR: 4.627 [1.982-10.802]). Effects were persistent throughout the whole follow-up. Neither peripheral B-cell repopulation nor immunoglobulin G levels were associated with rekindling disease activity., Discussion: Our prospectively collected observational data suggest suboptimal effectiveness of ocrelizumab in patients switching from FTY compared with those switching from other substances or having been treatment naive. These findings support previous studies indicating abated effectiveness of immune cell-depleting therapies following FTY treatment in patients with RMS., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with RMS, previous treatment with FTY compared with previous treatment with other immunomodulating therapies decreases the effectiveness of ocrelizumab., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Cladribine is a synthetic purine analogue that interferes with DNA synthesis and repair next to disrupting cellular proliferation in actively dividing lymphocytes. The compound is approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Cladribine can cross the blood-brain barrier, suggesting a potential effect on central nervous system (CNS) resident cells. Here, we explored compartment-specific immunosuppressive as well as potential direct neuroprotective effects of oral cladribine treatment in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) mice., Methods: In the current study, we compare immune cell frequencies and phenotypes in the periphery and CNS of EAE mice with distinct grey and white matter lesions (combined active and focal EAE) either orally treated with cladribine or vehicle, using flow cytometry. To evaluate potential direct neuroprotective effects, we assessed the integrity of the primary auditory cortex neuronal network by studying neuronal activity and spontaneous synaptic activity with electrophysiological techniques ex vivo., Results: Oral cladribine treatment significantly attenuated clinical deficits in EAE mice. Ex vivo flow cytometry showed that cladribine administration led to peripheral immune cell depletion in a compartment-specific manner and reduced immune cell infiltration into the CNS. Histological evaluations revealed no significant differences for inflammatory lesion load following cladribine treatment compared to vehicle control. Single cell electrophysiology in acute brain slices was performed and showed an impact of cladribine treatment on intrinsic cellular firing patterns and spontaneous synaptic transmission in neurons of the primary auditory cortex. Here, cladribine administration in vivo partially restored cortical neuronal network function, reducing action potential firing. Both, the effect on immune cells and neuronal activity were transient., Conclusions: Our results indicate that cladribine exerts a neuroprotective effect after crossing the blood-brain barrier independently of its peripheral immunosuppressant action., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: Intravenous methylprednisolone is the standard treatment for a multiple sclerosis relapse; however, this fails to improve symptoms in up to one quarter of patients. Immunoadsorption is an accepted treatment for refractory relapses, but prospective comparator-controlled studies are missing., Methods: In this observational study, patients with steroid-refractory acute multiple sclerosis relapses receiving either six courses of tryptophan-immunoadsorption or double-dose methylprednisolone therapy were analysed. Outcomes were evaluated at discharge and three months later. Immune profiling of blood lymphocytes and proteomic analysis were performed by multi-parameter flow cytometry and Olink analysis, respectively (NCT04450030)., Results: 42 patients were enrolled (methylprednisolone: 26 patients; immunoadsorption: 16 patients). For determination of the primary outcome, treatment response was stratified according to relative function system score changes ("full/best" vs. "average" vs. "worse/none"). Upon discharge, the adjusted odds ratio for any treatment response ("full/best" + "average" vs. "worse/none") was 10.697 favouring immunoadsorption (p = 0.005 compared to methylprednisolone). At follow-up, the adjusted odds ratio for the best treatment response ("full/best" vs. "average" + "worse/none") was 103.236 favouring IA patients (p = 0.001 compared to methylprednisolone). Similar results were observed regarding evoked potentials and quality of life outcomes, as well as serum neurofilament light-chain levels. Flow cytometry revealed a profound reduction of B cell subsets following immunoadsorption, which was closely correlated to clinical outcomes, whereas methylprednisolone had a minimal effect on B cell populations. Immunoadsorption treatment skewed the blood cytokine network, reduced levels of B cell-related cytokines and reduced immunoglobulin levels as well as levels of certain coagulation factors., Interpretation: Immunoadsorption demonstrated favourable outcomes compared to double-dose methylprednisolone. Outcome differences were significant at discharge and follow-up. Further analyses identified modulation of B cell function as a potential mechanism of action for immunoadsorption, as reduction of B cell subsets correlated with clinical improvement., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Cladribine is a synthetic deoxyadenosine analogue approved for the treatment of highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Cladribine is considered to be a semi-selective immune-reconstitution therapy (IRT) that induces long-term remission following short course of treatment. Here, we evaluated the effect of cladribine on immune cell reduction and reconstitution during the first two years of treatment., Methods: We analyzed our longitudinal, prospective, real-world cohort of 80 cladribine-treated RMS patients from two tertiary centers in Germany. Laboratory testing was conducted monthly and included evaluation of cellular as well as soluble parameters. Laboratory outcomes were correlated with infectious adverse events (AEs) and clinical or paraclinical disease activity., Results: Selective alterations in immune cell populations occurred following cladribine treatment, with the most marked effects observed in year two of treatment. Specifically, a rapid reduction in CD56 + natural killer cells (nadir: month 1 (year 1) and 14 (year 2); -37 and -41% from baseline) was followed by a greater reduction in CD19 + B cells (nadir: month 2 and 14; -81 and -82%); a moderate effect on CD4 + (nadir: month 3 and 15; -48 and -61%) and CD8 + T cells (nadir: month 5 and 18; -40 and -48%). Despite the marked effect on B cells, immunoglobulin levels were unaffected. There was no or minimal effect on thrombocytes and innate immune cells. Clinical and paraclinical disease activity was unrelated to the observed immune alterations. Lymphopenia was the most commonly observed AE (86.3% of patients; grade III-IV lymphopenia: 38.8%). The cumulative incidence of infections was 55% with cladribine treatment, which were mostly mild or moderate. In total, 19 herpes infections developed in 8 (10%) cladribine-treated patients; all cases were dermatomal and 94.7% of the herpetic infections occurred during a period of lymphopenia., Conclusions: The immunophenotyping data obtained in our real-world setting are comparable to those demonstrated in pivotal clinical trials and provide further evidence that cladribine may represent a form of IRT. However, regarding the side-effect profile of cladribine, severe lymphopenia (exceeding grade II CTCAE) was more frequent, which may have prompted the development of herpes infections. Of note, lymphocyte dynamics did not correlate with clinical and paraclinical measures of disease activity in the two-year follow-up period., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Alemtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody that causes rapid depletion of CD52-expressing immune cells. It has proven to be highly efficacious in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; however, the high risk of secondary autoimmune disorders has greatly complicated its use. Thus, deeper insight into the pathophysiology of secondary autoimmunity and potential biomarkers is urgently needed. The most critical time points in the decision-making process for alemtuzumab therapy are before or at Month 12, where the ability to identify secondary autoimmunity risk would be instrumental. Therefore, we investigated components of blood and CSF of up to 106 multiple sclerosis patients before and after alemtuzumab treatment focusing on those critical time points. Consistent with previous reports, deep flow cytometric immune-cell profiling (n = 30) demonstrated major effects on adaptive rather than innate immunity, which favoured regulatory immune cell subsets within the repopulation. The longitudinally studied CSF compartment (n = 18) mainly mirrored the immunological effects observed in the periphery. Alemtuzumab-induced changes including increased numbers of naïve CD4+ T cells and B cells as well as a clonal renewal of CD4+ T- and B-cell repertoires were partly reminiscent of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; in contrast, thymopoiesis was reduced and clonal renewal of T-cell repertoires after alemtuzumab was incomplete. Stratification for secondary autoimmunity did not show clear immununological cellular or proteomic traits or signatures associated with secondary autoimmunity. However, a restricted T-cell repertoire with hyperexpanded T-cell clones at baseline, which persisted and demonstrated further expansion at Month 12 by homeostatic proliferation, identified patients developing secondary autoimmune disorders (n = 7 without secondary autoimmunity versus n = 5 with secondary autoimmunity). Those processes were followed by an expansion of memory B-cell clones irrespective of persistence, which we detected shortly after the diagnosis of secondary autoimmune disease. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that (i) peripheral immunological alterations following alemtuzumab are mirrored by longitudinal changes in the CSF; (ii) incomplete T-cell repertoire renewal and reduced thymopoiesis contribute to a proautoimmune state after alemtuzumab; (iii) proteomics and surface immunological phenotyping do not identify patients at risk for secondary autoimmune disorders; (iv) homeostatic proliferation with disparate dynamics of clonal T- and B-cell expansions are associated with secondary autoimmunity; and (v) hyperexpanded T-cell clones at baseline and Month 12 may be used as a biomarker for the risk of alemtuzumab-induced autoimmunity., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

A critical issue in the management of relapsing MS (RMS) is the discontinuation of disease-modifying treatments (DMT) due to lack of efficacy, intolerability or impending risks. With new therapeutic agents introduced into the treatment of RMS, immediate- and long-term consequences of sequential drug use, as well as the effect of the sequence in which the drugs are given, are unclear but may affect efficacy, adverse events, and long-term immunocompetence. In the absence of clinical studies specifically addressing these concerns, observations from clinical practice are of particular value in guiding current management algorithms. Prompted by a study published by Ferraro et al. in this journal, we set out to provide an overview of the published real-world evidence on the effectiveness and safety of switching from fingolimod to another DMT in patients with active RMS. Seventeen publications reporting relevant information were identified. The literature suggests that immune cell depletion induced by alemtuzumab or ocrelizumab is associated with an increased risk of relapse and worsening disability in patients switching from fingolimod compared to patients switching from other therapeutic agents. However, the evidence reported for natalizumab and cladribine is inconclusive. While shortening of the washout period may limit early disease reactivation after fingolimod discontinuation, there is no strong evidence that the duration of the washout period or the absolute lymphocyte count at baseline are predictors of attenuated long-term efficacy. Further real-world studies are required to better understand outcomes among patients who are under-represented in controlled trials., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Alemtuzumab is an anti-CD52 antibody approved for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The summary of product characteristics (SmPC) provides recommendations on the administration of alemtuzumab to prevent or reduce the risk of serious side effects associated with alemtuzumab infusion, including myocardial ischemia, hemorrhagic stroke, arterial dissection, and pulmonary alveolar hemorrhage. However, real-world implementation of alemtuzumab infusion management recommendations has not been previously assessed., Methods: Here we provide a large-scale multi-center (in- and outpatient) observational study on alemtuzumab infusion management in daily clinical care in Germany (ALEMLL08025; INFUSE-MS; NIS-no. 364). Parameters of infusion management - including infusion administration, clinical and laboratory monitoring - were assessed, compared between study centers and the occurrence of infusion-associated reactions (IARs) was documented. Moreover, the TSQM and MSIS-29 questionnaires were used to quantify patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life., Results: 140 RRMS patients were enrolled in this study. Alemtuzumab infusion regimes (treatment course 1 and 2) were comparable between infusion sites and in accordance with recommendations by the SmPC. Standardization of infusion management was associated with a satisfactory safety profile. IARs were usually mild, headache (13.6%), rash (10.7%), and pyrexia (6.4%) being the most common ones. TSQM and MSIS-29 scores denoted high patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life among RRMS patients treated with alemtuzumab., Conclusion: In conclusion, our results indicate that infusion management of alemtuzumab is highly standardized and in line with the SmPC. Alemtuzumab treatment and implementation of infusion management recommendations are associated with a satisfactory safety profile regarding the occurrence of IARs, a high patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life as important indicators for the quality of MS care., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Rag1 -/- mice, lacking functional B and T cells, have been extensively used as an adoptive transfer model to evaluate neuroinflammation in stroke research. However, it remains unknown whether natural killer (NK) cell development and functions are altered in Rag1 -/- mice as well. This connection has been rarely discussed in previous studies but might have important implications for data interpretation. In contrast, the NOD-Rag1 null IL2rg null (NRG) mouse model is devoid of NK cells and might therefore eliminate this potential shortcoming. Here, we compare immune-cell frequencies as well as phenotype and effector functions of NK cells in Rag1 -/- and wildtype (WT) mice using flow cytometry and functional in vitro assays. Further, we investigate the effect of Rag1 -/- NK cells in the transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) model using antibody-mediated depletion of NK cells and adoptive transfer to NRG mice in vivo. NK cells in Rag1 -/- were comparable in number and function to those in WT mice. Rag1 -/- mice treated with an anti-NK1.1 antibody developed significantly smaller infarctions and improved behavioral scores. Correspondingly, NRG mice supplemented with NK cells were more susceptible to tMCAO, developing infarctions and neurological deficits similar to Rag1 -/- controls. Our results indicate that NK cells from Rag1 -/- mice are fully functional and should therefore be considered in the interpretation of immune-cell transfer models in experimental stroke. Fortunately, we identified the NRG mice, as a potentially better-suited transfer model to characterize individual cell subset-mediated neuroinflammation in stroke., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Oral cladribine has been approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) yet real-world evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety remains scarce., Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes of MS patients following induction of cladribine., Methods: We evaluated our prospective cohort of cladribine-treated MS patients from two tertiary centres in Germany. Relapses, disability worsening and occurrence of new or enlarging T2-hyperintense magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions were assessed as well as lymphocyte counts and herpes virus infections., Results: Among 270 patients treated with cladribine, we observed a profound reduction of both relapses and new or enlarging MRI lesions. Treatment appeared more efficacious, especially in patients without previous therapy or following platform substances. Patients switching from natalizumab were prone to re-emerging disease activity. Among patients following dimethyl fumarate pre-treatment, severe lymphopenia was common and associated with increased rates of herpes virus manifestations., Conclusion: Overall, we observed an efficacy and safety profile of cladribine consistent with data from the phase 3 clinical trial. However, patients switching from natalizumab experienced suboptimal disease control beyond rebound activity following cessation of natalizumab. Furthermore, dimethyl fumarate pre-treatment was associated with a profound risk of developing severe lymphopenia and subsequent herpes virus infections.

Background & Aims: The 2-pore potassium channel subfamily K member 9 (KCNK9) regulates intracellular calcium concentration and thus modulates cell survival and inflammatory signaling pathways. It also was recognized as a risk allele for inflammatory bowel disease. However, it remains unclear whether KCNK9 modulates inflammatory bowel disease via its impact on immune cell function or whether its influence on calcium homeostasis also is relevant in intestinal epithelial cells., Methods: Kcnk9 -/- mice were challenged with 3% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) to induce experimental acute colitis. Primary cultures of intestinal epithelial cells were generated, and expression of potassium channels as well as cytosolic calcium levels and susceptibility to apoptosis were evaluated. Furthermore, we evaluated whether KCNK9 deficiency was compensated by the closely related 2-pore potassium channel KCNK3 in vivo or in vitro., Results: Compared with controls, KCNK9 deficiency or its pharmacologic blockade were associated with aggravated DSS-induced colitis compared with wild-type animals. In the absence of KCNK9, intestinal epithelial cells showed increased intracellular calcium levels and were more prone to mitochondrial damage and caspase-9-dependent apoptosis. We found that expression of KCNK3 was increased in Kcnk9 -/- mice but did not prevent apoptosis after DSS exposure. Conversely, increased levels of KCNK9 in Kcnk3 -/- mice were associated with an ameliorated course of DSS-induced colitis., Conclusions: KCNK9 enhances mitochondrial stability, reduces apoptosis, und thus supports epithelial cell survival after DSS exposure in vivo and in vitro. Conversely, its increased expression in Kcnk3 -/- resulted in less mitochondrial damage and apoptosis and was associated with beneficial outcomes in DSS-induced colitis., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

It remains largely unclear how thymocytes translate relative differences in T cell receptor (TCR) signal strength into distinct developmental programs that drive the cell fate decisions towards conventional (Tconv) or regulatory T cells (Treg). Following TCR activation, intracellular calcium (Ca 2+ ) is the most important second messenger, for which the potassium channel K 2P 18.1 is a relevant regulator. Here, we identify K 2P 18.1 as a central translator of the TCR signal into the thymus-derived Treg (tTreg) selection process. TCR signal was coupled to NF-κB-mediated K 2P 18.1 upregulation in tTreg progenitors. K 2P 18.1 provided the driving force for sustained Ca 2+ influx that facilitated NF-κB- and NFAT-dependent expression of FoxP3, the master transcription factor for Treg development and function. Loss of K 2P 18.1 ion-current function induced a mild lymphoproliferative phenotype in mice, with reduced Treg numbers that led to aggravated experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, while a gain-of-function mutation in K 2P 18.1 resulted in increased Treg numbers in mice. Our findings in human thymus, recent thymic emigrants and multiple sclerosis patients with a dominant-negative missense K 2P 18.1 variant that is associated with poor clinical outcomes indicate that K 2P 18.1 also plays a role in human Treg development. Pharmacological modulation of K 2P 18.1 specifically modulated Treg numbers in vitro and in vivo. Finally, we identified nitroxoline as a K 2P 18.1 activator that led to rapid and reversible Treg increase in patients with urinary tract infections. Conclusively, our findings reveal how K 2P 18.1 translates TCR signals into thymic T cell fate decisions and Treg development, and provide a basis for the therapeutic utilization of Treg in several human disorders., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background and Objectives: In MS, an age-related decline in disease activity and a decreased efficacy of disease-modifying treatment have been linked to immunosenescence, a state of cellular dysfunction associated with chronic inflammation., Methods: To evaluate age-related immunologic alterations in MS, we compared immune signatures in peripheral blood (PB) and CSF by flow cytometry in patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) (PB n = 38; CSF n = 51) and primary progressive (PP) MS (PB n = 40; CSF n = 36) and respective controls (PB n = 40; CSF n = 85)., Results: Analysis revealed significant age-related changes in blood immune cell composition, especially in the CD8 T-cell compartment of healthy donors (HDs) and patients with MS. However, HDs displayed a strong age-dependent decline in the expression of the immunoregulatory molecules KLRG1, LAG3, and CTLA-4 on memory CD8 T cells, whereas this age-dependent reduction was completely abrogated in patients with MS. An age-dependent increase in the expression of the costimulatory molecule CD226 on memory CD8 T cells was absent in patients with MS. CD226 expression correlated with disability in younger (≤50 years) patients with MS. CSF analysis revealed a significant age-dependent decline in various immune cell populations in PPMS but not RRMS, suggesting a differential effect of aging on the intrathecal compartment in PPMS., Discussion: Our data illustrate that aging in MS is associated with a dysbalance between costimulatory and immunoregulatory signals provided by CD8 T cells favoring a proinflammatory phenotype and, more importantly, a pattern of premature immune aging in the CD8 T-cell compartment of young patients with MS with potential implications for disease severity., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Oral cladribine is an approved disease-modifying drug for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. In controlled clinical trials as well as in post marketing safety assessments, autoimmune conditions have not yet been reported as a specific side effect of cladribine., Objective and Results: Here, we report a case of anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody-mediated glomerulonephritis that occurred shortly after the fourth cladribine treatment cycle., Conclusion: Neurologists should be attentive to the development of secondary autoimmunity in cladribine-treated patients.

Objectives: Alemtuzumab is effective in patients with active multiple sclerosis but has a complex safety profile, including the development of secondary autoimmunity. Most of patients enrolled in randomised clinical trials with alemtuzumab were either treatment naïve or pretreated with injectable substances. Other previous disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) were not used in the study cohorts, and therefore, associated risks might yet remain unidentified., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated a prospective dual-centre alemtuzumab cohort of 170 patients. We examined the baseline characteristics as well as safety and effectiveness outcomes, including the time to first relapse, the time to 3 months confirmed disability worsening and the time to secondary autoimmunity., Results: The regression analysis showed that, among all previously used DMTs, the pretreatment with fingolimod (n=33 HRs for the time to first relapse (HR 5.420, 95% CI 2.520 to 11.660; p<0.001)) and for the time to worsening of disability (HR 7.676, 95% CI 2.870 to 20.534; p<0.001). Additionally, patients pretreated with fingolimod were more likely to experience spinal relapses (55% vs 10% among previously naïve patients; p<0.001) and had an increased risk of secondary autoimmunity (HR 5.875, 95% CI 2.126 to 16.27; p<0.001)., Conclusion: In the real-world setting, we demonstrated suboptimal disease control and increased risk of secondary autoimmunity following alemtuzumab, among patients previously treated with fingolimod. These data can provide guidance for improving MS therapeutic management., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SP: received travel grants from Sanofi Genzyme and Merck Serono, lecturing honoraria from Sanofi Genzyme, Mylan Healthcare, and Biogen, and research support from Diamed, Merck Serono, and the German Multiple Sclerosis Society Northrhine-Westphalia. TR: received travel grants and financial research support from Genzyme and Novartis and received honoraria for lecturing from Roche, Merck, Genzyme, Biogen and Teva. RP: received honoraria for lecturing and travel expenses for attending meetings from Alexion, Bayer Health Care, Biogen, Merck Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva; has received research funding from Novartis. LR: received travel grants from Merck Serono and Sanofi-Genzyme. MP: received speaker honoraria and travel reimbursements from Novartis. CK: received travel grants from TEVA, compensation for serving on Scientific Advisory Boards for Novartis, and speaker honoraria from Biogen, Genzyme, and Merck Serono. BW: received grants from the German Ministry of Education and Research, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Dietmar Hopp Foundation and Klaus Tschira Foundation, grants and personal fees from Merck Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis pharmaceuticals, and personal fees from Bayer, Biogen, Teva Pharma. LK: received compensation for serving on Scientific Advisory Boards for Genzyme, Janssen, Novartis, and Roche. She received speaker honoraria and travel support from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche and TEVA. She receives research support from the German Ministry for Education and Research, the German Research Foundation, the IZKF Münster, IMF Münster, Biogen, Novartis, and Merck Serono. CK: received honoraria for lecturing and travel expenses for attending meetings from Almirall, Merck Serono, Desitin, Sanofi-Genzyme, Biogen, Teva, Bayer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Siemens, Eisai, Biotronik, Roche, Stago, Ever Pharma, CSL Behring, Mylan, MedDay Pharmaceuticals, Amgen. HW: received compensation for serving on Scientific Advisory Boards/Steering Committees for Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck Serono, and Novartis. He received speaker honoraria and travel support from Bayer Vital GmbH, Bayer Schering AG, Biogen, CSL Behring, EMD Serono, Fresenius Medical Care, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Omniamed, Novartis, and Sanofi Aventis. He received compensation as a consultant from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. HW also received research support from Bayer Healthcare, Bayer Vital, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Sanofi US and Teva. SGM: received honoraria for lecturing and travel expenses for attending meetings from Almirall, Amicus Therapeutics Germany, Bayer Health Care, Biogen, Celgene, Diamed, Genzyme, MedDay Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, ONO Pharma, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Chugai Pharma, QuintilesIMS, and Teva. His research is funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation, German Academic Exchange Service, Hertie Foundation, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Studies (IZKF) Muenster, German Foundation Neurology and by Almirall, Amicus Therapeutics Germany, Biogen, Diamed, Fresenius Medical Care, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, ONO Pharma, Roche, and Teva., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To evaluate the clinical consequences of extended interval dosing (EID) of ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic., Methods: In our retrospective, multicenter cohort study, we compared patients with RRMS on EID (defined as ≥4-week delay of dose interval) with a control group on standard interval dosing (SID) at the same period (January to December 2020)., Results: Three hundred eighteen patients with RRMS were longitudinally evaluated in 5 German centers. One hundred sixteen patients received ocrelizumab on EID (median delay [interquartile range 8.68 [5.09-13.07] weeks). Three months after the last ocrelizumab infusion, 182 (90.1%) patients following SID and 105 (90.5%) EID patients remained relapse free ( p = 0.903). Three-month confirmed progression of disability was observed in 18 SID patients (8.9%) and 11 EID patients (9.5%, p = 0.433). MRI progression was documented in 9 SID patients (4.5%) and 8 EID patients (6.9%) at 3-month follow-up ( p = 0.232). Multivariate logistic regression showed no association between treatment regimen and no evidence of disease activity status at follow-up (OR: 1.266 [95% CI: 0.695-2.305]; p = 0.441). Clinical stability was accompanied by persistent peripheral CD19 + B-cell depletion in both groups (SID vs EID: 82.6% vs 83.3%, p = 0.463). Disease activity in our cohort was not associated with CD19 + B-cell repopulation., Conclusion: Our data support EID of ocrelizumab as potential risk mitigation strategy in times of the COVID-19 pandemic., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with RRMS, an EID of at least 4 weeks does not diminish effectiveness of ocrelizumab., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Several studies suggest a role for the peripheral immune system in the pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. However, comprehensive studies investigating the intrathecal immune system in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis are rare. To elucidate whether compartment-specific inflammation contributes to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis pathophysiology, we here investigated intrathecal and peripheral immune profiles in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients and compared them with controls free of neurological disorders (controls) and patients with dementia or primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Routine CSF parameters were examined in 308 patients, including 132 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. In a subgroup of 41 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients, extensive flow-cytometric immune cell profiling in peripheral blood and CSF was performed and compared with data from 26 controls, 25 dementia and 21 multiple sclerosis patients. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients presented with significantly altered proportions of monocyte subsets in peripheral blood and increased frequencies of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells expressing the activation marker HLA-DR in peripheral blood (CD8 + ) and CSF (CD4 + and CD8 + ) compared with controls. While dementia and multiple sclerosis patients exhibited a comparable increase in intrathecal CD8 + T-cell activation, CD8 + T-cell activation in the peripheral blood in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was higher than in multiple sclerosis patients. Furthermore, intrathecal CD4 + T-cell activation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis surpassed levels in dementia patients. Intrathecal T-cell activation resulted from in situ activation rather than transmigration of activated T cells from the blood. While T-cell activation did not correlate with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression, patients with rapid disease progression showed reduced intrathecal levels of immune-regulatory CD56 bright natural killer cells. The integration of these parameters into a composite score facilitated the differentiation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients from patients of all other cohorts. To conclude, alterations in peripheral monocyte subsets, as well as increased peripheral and intrathecal activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells concomitant with diminished immune regulation by CD56 bright natural killer cells, suggest an involvement of these immune cells in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis pathophysiology., (© The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

In the recent past, a plethora of drugs have been approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). These therapeutics are mainly confined to immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive strategies but do not sufficiently address remyelination and neuroprotection. However, several neuroregenerative agents have shown potential in pre-clinical research and entered Phase I to III clinical trials. Although none of these compounds have yet proceeded to approval, understanding the causes of failure can broaden our knowledge about neuroprotection and neuroregeneration in MS. Moreover, most of the investigated approaches are characterised by consistent mechanisms of action and proved convincing efficacy in animal studies. Therefore, learning from their failure will help us to enforce the translation of findings acquired in pre-clinical studies into clinical application. Here, we summarise trials on MS treatment published since 2015 that have either failed or were interrupted due to a lack of efficacy, adverse events, or for other reasons. We further outline the rationale underlying these drugs and analyse the background of failure to gather new insights into MS pathophysiology and optimise future study designs. For conciseness, this review focuses on agents promoting remyelination and medications with primarily neuroprotective properties or unconventional approaches. Failed clinical trials that pursue immunomodulation are presented in a separate article.

Objective: To report 77 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who developed skin-related adverse events (AEs) following treatment with cladribine., Methods: We evaluated our prospective bicentric cladribine cohort. Cladribine-treated patients with a skin AE were identified., Results: Two hundred thirty-nine cladribine-treated patients with MS were evaluated. Seventy-seven patients (32%) showed at least 1 skin AE at median 1 month after cladribine initiation (range: 1-12). Within first 3 months following last cladribine exposition, hair thinning (n = 28, 12%), skin rash (n = 20; 8%), mucositis (n = 13, 5%), and pruritus (n = 6, 3%) were observed. Furthermore, 35 patients (15%) developed herpes virus infections (time since last cladribine exposition: median 83 [range: 10-305]). In 15 patients, herpes zoster infection was severe (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) and required hospitalization. Delayed skin AEs (≥3 months after a cladribine treatment cycle) involved 1 case of leukocytoclastic vasculitis and 2 cases of alopecia areata. Finally, 2 patients presented with in total 3 isolated precancerous lesions (1 leukoplakia simplex and 2 actinic keratosis) and 1 patient developed a squamous cell carcinoma., Conclusion: Skin AEs are common in patients with MS treated with cladribine. Until risk management plans have been adjusted to include these phenomena, clinicians should perform a thorough clinical follow-up and in suspicious cases seek early interdisciplinary support. In light of the observed delayed skin reactions, we further emphasize the necessity of careful clinical surveillance of cladribine-treated patients for yet undescribed secondary autoimmune events., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that skin-related AEs are frequent in patients with MS following cladribine in a real-world setting., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Purpose: Steroid-responsive encephalopathy associated with autoimmune thyroiditis (SREAT) is a rare condition defined by encephalopathy with acute or subacute onset, the presence of serum anti-thyroid antibodies, and reasonable exclusion of alternative causes. Despite having strong response towards corticosteroid treatment, some patients exhibit a chronic-relapsing course and require long-term immunosuppression. Markers for early identification of those patients are still absent. Thus, we aimed to characterise clinical as well as laboratory parameters of our local SREAT cohort., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of 22 SREAT patients treated in our hospital from January 2014., Results: A total of 14 patients with a monophasic disease course and eight patients with multiple relapses were identified. Neither baseline characteristics nor routine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters were able to distinguish between those patient groups. Flow cytometry following initial relapse therapy showed treatment-resistant sequestration of activated CD4+ T cells in patients with a relapsing disease course, whereas other lymphocyte subsets showed uniform changes. Such changes were also present in long-term follow-up CSF examination., Conclusion: Our findings indicate a potential biomarker for risk stratification in patients with SREAT. Currently, it remains unclear whether the observed two phenotypes are different spectra of SREAT or represent separate diseases in terms of pathophysiology., (© 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Aims: Various attempts have been made to support recovery following optic neuritis (ON), but the respective trials have mostly been negative. The aim of this study was to determine whether disease-modifying treatment (DMT) following ON as first manifestation of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis influences long-term outcomes., Methods: A total of 79 patients with ON were identified and evaluated at relapse, DMT induction, and 12 months following treatment induction with either glatiramer acetate (GLAT), interferon-beta (IFN), or teriflunomide (TRF). Low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) and full-field visual-evoked potentials (FF-VEP) were compared between treatment groups using multivariable regression models. The impact of TRF treatment induction compared with IFN or GLAT following relapses outside the optic nerves was evaluated in an independent cohort of 122 patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes and rates of confirmed improvement of relapse-related disability were evaluated., Results: TRF-treated patients exhibited higher LCLA and lower relative P100 latencies normalized to the fellow-eye. Findings were significant following covariate-adjustment by multivariable analyses. Cranial MRI lesion load as well as disability progression rates were not significantly different between groups. The cohort of patients following relapses other than ON showed no differences in confirmed improvement of disability., Conclusion: TRF treatment is associated with favorable outcomes regarding functional optic nerve recovery following ON in early multiple sclerosis., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: Steffen Pfeuffer: received travel grants from Sanofi Genzyme and Merck Serono, lecturing honoraria from Sanofi Genzyme, Mylan Healthcare, and Biogen, and research support from Diamed, Merck Serono, and the German Multiple Sclerosis Society Northrhine-Westphalia. Laura Kerschke: declares no conflicts of interest Tobias Ruck: received travel grants and financial research support from Genzyme and Novartis and received honoraria for lecturing from Roche, Merck, Genzyme, Biogen, and Teva. Leoni Rolfes: received travel grants from Merck Serono and Sanofi-Genzyme. Marc Pawlitzki: received speaker honoraria and travel reimbursements from Novartis. Philipp Albrecht: received compensation for serving on Scientific Advisory Boards for Allergan, Biogen, Celgene, Ipsen, Merck Serono, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Roche. He received speaker honoraria and travel support from Allergan, Bayer Vital GmbH, Biogen, Celgene, Ipsen, Merck Serono, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Roche. Philipp Albrecht received research support from Allergan, Biogen, Celgene, Ipsen, Merck Serono, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Roche. Heinz Wiendl: received compensation for serving on Scientific Advisory Boards/Steering Committees for Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck Serono, and Novartis. He received speaker honoraria and travel support from Bayer Vital GmbH, Bayer Schering AG, Biogen, CSL Behring, EMD Serono, Fresenius Medical Care, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Omniamed, Novartis, and Sanofi Aventis. He received compensation as a consultant from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Heinz Wiendl also received research support from Bayer Healthcare, Bayer Vital, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Sanofi US, and Teva. Sven G. Meuth: received honoraria for lecturing and travel expenses for attending meetings from Almirall, Amicus Therapeutics Germany, Bayer Health Care, Biogen, Celgene, Diamed, Genzyme, MedDay Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, ONO Pharma, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Chugai Pharma, QuintilesIMS, and Teva. His research is funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation, German Academic Exchange Service, Hertie Foundation, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Studies (IZKF) Muenster, German Foundation Neurology and by Almirall, Amicus Therapeutics Germany, Biogen, Diamed, Fresenius Medical Care, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, ONO Pharma, Roche, and Teva. The current work was conducted outside of third-party funding., (© The Author(s), 2021.)

In the past decades, multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment has experienced vast changes resulting from major advances in disease-modifying therapies (DMT). Looking at the overall number of studies, investigations with therapeutic advantages and encouraging results are exceeded by studies of promising compounds that failed due to either negative or inconclusive results or have been interrupted for other reasons. Importantly, these failed clinical trials are informative experiments that can help us to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying MS. In several trials, concepts taken from experimental models were not translatable to humans, although they did not lack a well-considered pathophysiological rationale. The lessons learned from these discrepancies may benefit future studies and reduce the risks for patients. This review summarizes trials on MS since 2015 that have either failed or have been interrupted for various reasons. We identify potential causes of failure or inconclusiveness, looking at the path from basic animal experiments to clinical trials, and discuss the implications for our current view on MS pathogenesis, clinical practice, and future study designs. We focus on anti-inflammatory treatment strategies, without including studies on already approved and effective DMT. Clinical trials addressing neuroprotective and alternative treatment strategies are presented in a separate article.

Background: Based on clinical, immunological and histopathological evidence, MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM) has emerged as a distinct disease entity different from multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4-antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). MOG-EM is associated with a broader clinical phenotype including optic neuritis, myelitis, brainstem lesions and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis with a substantial clinical and radiological overlap to other demyelinating CNS disorders., Objective: To evaluate common clinical, MRI and CSF findings, as well as therapy responses in patients with longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) as initial clinical presentation of MOG-EM., Methods: After excluding patients with a known diagnosis of MS, we identified 153 patients with myelitis of which 7 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were investigated for MRI, CSF and clinical parameters., Results: Patients with LETM as first clinical presentation of MOG-EM display similar characteristics, namely a lack of gadolinium-enhancement in spinal cord MRI, marked pleocytosis, negative oligoclonal bands, a previous history of infections/vaccinations and response to antibody-depleting treatments for acute attacks and long-term treatment., Conclusions: We identify common pathological findings in patients with LETM as first clinical presentation of MOG-EM which distinguishes it from other forms of LETM and should lead to testing for MOG-IgG in these cases.

Intravenous methyl prednisolone (IVMPS) represents the standard of care for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses, but fail to improve symptoms in one quarter of patients. In this regard, apart from extending steroid treatment to a higher dose, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been recognized as a treatment option. The aim of this retrospective, monocentric study was to investigate the efficacy of TPE versus escalated dosages of IVMPS in refractory MS relapses. An in-depth medical chart review was performed to identify patients from local databases. Relapse recovery was stratified as "good/full", "average" and "worst/no" according to function score development. In total, 145 patients were analyzed. Good/average/worst recovery at discharge was observed in 60.9%/32.6%/6.5% of TPE versus 15.2%/14.1%/70.7% of IVMPS patients, respectively. A total of 53.5% of IVMPS patients received TPE as rescue treatment and 54.8% then responded satisfactorily. The multivariable odds ratio (OR) for worst/no recovery was 39.01 (95%-CI: 10.41-146.18; p ≤ 0.001), favoring administration of TPE as first escalation treatment. The effects were sustained at three-month follow-ups, as OR for further deterioration was 6.48 (95%-CI: 2.48-16.89; p ≤ 0.001), favoring TPE. In conclusion, TPE was superior over IVMPS in the amelioration of relapse symptoms at discharge and follow-up. This study provides class IV evidence supporting the administration of TPE as the first escalation treatment to steroid-refractory MS relapses.

Background: Multiple sclerosis is one of the most prevalent neurological diseases in young adults affecting over 2 million people worldwide. Alemtuzumab is a highly effective therapy in relapsing remitting MS. Alemtuzumab is a monoclonal CD52 antibody that proved its efficacy against an active comparator (interferon [IFN]-β1a) in a phase II trial and two phase III trials regarding clinical and MRI outcomes. Nevertheless, the exact mode of action is still unknown. Alemtuzumab is commonly associated with secondary autoimmune disorders significantly affecting the risk-benefit ratio. Therefore, new biomarkers predicting treatment response and adverse events are urgently needed. This study aims to further elucidate the mechanism of action of the neuroprotective potential of alemtuzumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)., Methods/design: This is a 3-year multicentre, explorative study including overall 150 patients comprising three different groups: (i) de novo patients prior and after alemtuzumab treatment initiation, (ii) patients under alemtuzumab treatment and (iii) patients requiring more than two alemtuzumab infusions. Peripheral blood and serum samples will be collected semi-annually for several in vitro/ex vivo assays to detect and characterize immune cells including their functional activity. Furthermore, data of MRI scans and disease-related impairment (using EDSS and MSFC), as well as the number and time of relapses, will be assessed. The clinical study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04082260)., Perspective: Our study will provide deep insights into the underlying immunological changes in a longitudinal analysis of alemtuzumab treated RRMS patients. By combining clinical, radiological and functional immune-phenotype data, we will be able to identify biomarkers and/or immune signatures predicting treatment response and adverse events. Thereby, the understanding of the mechanisms of action of alemtuzumab will improve its efficacy and safety for present and future patients., Competing Interests: Competing interestsLB has no competing interests. TR reports grants from German Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Sanofi Genzyme, personal fees from Biogen, personal fees and non-financial support from Merck Serono, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Teva, outside the submitted work. SP reports personal fees and non-financial support from Sanofi Genzyme, personal fees from Biogen, personal fees and non-financial support from Merck Serono, personal fees from Mylan, and grants from Diamed, outside the submitted work CCG reports grants from German Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology, grants from Collaborative Research Centre CRC TR128, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Sanofi Genzyme, grants from Biogen, personal fees from Bayer Health Care, grants from Novartis, grants from Euroimmun, personal fees from Mylan, outside the submitted work. HW reports grants from German Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology, grants from Collaborative Research Centre CRC TR128, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Biogen, personal fees from Eygen, personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Roche, grants and personal fees from Sanofi Genzyme, personal fees from Teva, grants from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from WebMD Global, personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Alexion, personal fees from Acetelion, personal fees from Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Society, outside the submitted work. SGM reports grants from German Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Almirall, personal fees from Bayer Health Care, grants and personal fees from Biogen, grants and personal fees from Diamed, personal fees from Fresenius Medical Care, grants and personal fees from Sanofi Genzyme, grants and personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from ONO Pharma, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Teva, outside the submitted work., (© The Author(s) 2019.)

Objective: The use of alemtuzumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-CD52 antibody has changed the therapy of highly active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Alemtuzumab infusion depletes most lymphocytes in peripheral blood, whereas differential recovery of immune cells, probably those with a less CNS-autoreactive phenotype, is supposed to underlie its long-lasting effects. To determine whether alemtuzumab significantly reduces immunoglobulin levels in blood and CSF of treated patients, we analyzed blood and CSF samples of 38 patients with MS treated with alemtuzumab regarding changes in immunoglobulin levels., Methods: Blood and CSF samples of patients were collected at the beginning of alemtuzumab treatment and at 12, 24, and 36 months after the first administration of the drug. Specimens were analyzed regarding immunoglobulin concentrations in blood and CSF., Results: We observed significant and dose-dependent reductions of immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM, and IgA) in serum and CSF 12 and 24 months following 2 courses of alemtuzumab. Patients with persistent or returning disease activity who were treated with a third course of alemtuzumab exhibited even further decrease in IgG levels compared with matched controls treated twice. Here, alemtuzumab-treated patients with IgG levels below the lower limits of normal were more susceptible to pneumonia, sinusitis, and otitis, whereas upper respiratory tract and urinary tract infections were not associated therewith., Conclusions: Our results suggest to monitor IgG levels for safety reasons in patients treated with alemtuzumab-in particular when additional treatment courses are required-and to consider preventive action in critical cases., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with RRMS alemtuzumab reduces immunoglobulin levels., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Allelic variants of genes encoding for the Fc gamma receptors IIIA and IIA have been associated with the clinical response to cell-depleting antibodies in lymphoma patients. Here, we tested the hypothesis that FCGR3A and FCGR2A high-affinity polymorphisms predict clinical outcomes to alemtuzumab therapy in 85 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. No differences in clinical and MRI-based efficacy parameters, the development of severe infusion-associated reactions and secondary autoimmune diseases during a 2 year follow-up was observed based on FCGR3A or FCGR2A polymorphisms. This study does not support the use of FCGR genetic variants to predict clinical outcomes to alemtuzumab., (© 2019 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

A major concern caused by the discontinuation of disease modifying treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) is a rebound of disease activity. Hypotheses about the underlying mechanism of fingolimod (FTY) induced exaggerated inflammatory responses are diverse. So far, vaccinations as a trigger for rebound activity following FTY suspension have not been described. However, several reports have highlighted the occurrence of neurological and autoimmune side effects after single or combined multi-vaccination procedures. Here, we describe the case of a highly active female MS patient demonstrating recurrent, severe MS relapses accompanied by extensive MRI activity, subsequent to yellow fever vaccination two months following FTY withdrawal. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid immunophenotyping indicated a B cell/plasma cell autoreactivity. Following a therapy with natalizumab the clinical, laboratory, MRI, and disease course improved significantly. This case hints towards a combined immunological mechanism characterized by molecular mimicry, bystander activation, and lymphocyte re-egress, resulting in extensive neurological impairment and shows that natalizumab represents a therapeutic option to counteract B cell mediated autoreactivity. Especially, the diagnostic and therapeutic management of this complex scenario might be instructive for clinical practice.