Search

While tobacco use remains a leading preventable risk factor for mortality and morbidity in Canada (Patra, Rehm, Baliunas & Popova, 2007), the overall smoking prevalence rate of Canadians has decreased substantially from close to 50% of the population in 1965 to 16.1% of the population in 2012 (Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey (CTUMS) 2012; Reid, Hammond, Rynard & Burkhalter, 2014). However, up to 85% of individuals with a mental illness continue to use tobacco products (Harris, Parle & Gagne, 2007), contributing to an inequitable distribution of negative health outcomes for this population. Individuals with severe mental illness die an estimated twenty-five years earlier than the general population, with sixty per cent of these deaths due to cardiovascular, pulmonary and infectious disease (Parks, Svendsen, Singer, & Foti, 2006). A recent study that examined specific tobacco-attributable deaths in these populations found that tobacco accounted for 53% of deaths in individuals with schizophrenia, 50% of all deaths for those diagnosed with a depressive disorder, and 48% of all deaths for those with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (Callaghan et al., 2014). This research project is intended to increase our understanding of what constitutes an effective intervention for smoking cessation and smoking reduction in a population of individuals with severe mental illness who are homeless or vulnerably housed, living in a large urban setting. Two areas of inquiry were proposed. The first inquiry examined data collected as part of a needs assessment to determine the overall prevalence rate of smoking and related behaviours for a population of individuals with severe mental illness receiving services from a community mental health agency. We found that the tobacco use prevalence was 72%, and 62% of smokers had high or very high levels of nicotine dependence; however almost half of respondents (47%) were interested in quitting or reducing tobacco within the next 6 months. Smokers were found to be over 9 times more likely to have a co-occurring substance use disorder (OR=9.44, 95%CI[6.33,14.08]). The second inquiry was a pilot study conducting a randomized controlled trial design to evaluate smoking cessation and smoking reduction outcomes for two groups of individuals (n=61) with severe mental illness receiving different smoking cessation interventions. Clients randomly assigned to the routine Smoking Cessation group (SC-R) received up to 24 weeks of no-cost Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) and clients assigned to the Smoking Cessation Plus group (SC+) received up to 24 weeks of no-cost Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) plus two initial individual sessions of motivational interviewing followed by weekly psychosocial group interventions for up to 24 weeks. Primary outcomes were levels of tobacco use at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up. The 7-day point prevalence abstinence rate measured at 3 months was 21.9% (n=7) for the SC+ group and 13.8% (n=4) for the SC-R group (OR=1.75,95%CI[.46,6.74]). At 6 months, the 7-day point prevalence abstinence rate was 12.5% (n=4) for the SC+ group and 6.9% (n=2) for the SC-R group (OR=1.93, 95%CI[.33,11.41]). Secondary outcomes included change in reported quality of life, physical health and mental health status functioning over the course of the study. We found that there were no statistically significant differences in the smoking quit or smoking reduction rates between the two treatment groups. At the 3-month time point the overall quit rate for both groups combined was 18% (n=11) and at the 6-month time point the quit rate was 10% (n=6). Reduction in the number of daily cigarettes smoked was statistically significant over time (F [1.68, 98.90] = 55.13, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.48) for both groups, as was the overall reduction of the FTND score (F [2, 94] = 17.98, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.28). This research demonstrates that collecting vital tobacco prevalence and dependency information is a straightforward and important task for community mental health agencies. Individuals with mental illness have both the interest and ability to quit or reduce their use of tobacco. Practitioners need to be aware of alternative smoking practices that may contribute to understanding tobacco use patterns and dependence in this population. Other factors such as co-morbid substance use disorder and level of community functioning may influence smoking status and, consequently, how treatment is provided. The findings of the pilot trial demonstrate the feasibility of conducting smoking cessation research with the population. Findings also suggest that a larger definitive trial is warranted to examine the effectiveness of the SC+ intervention. This research adds to the limited but growing knowledge base of how to address tobacco use and provide treatment to this vulnerable group, and will contribute to advances in population health by informing effective interventions with the attendant implications for program and policy development.

Plain language summary: The PROMPT study is a community-based research project designed to understand the factors which affect smoking as well as ways to manage, reduce and quit smoking among people who use drugs in Ottawa. There is strong medical evidence that smoking tobacco is related to more than two dozen diseases and conditions. Smoking tobacco remains the leading cause of preventable death and has negative health impacts on people of all ages. Although Ottawa has one of the lowest smoking rates in Ontario (12 %), major differences exist, with approximately a 96 % smoking rate among those who use drugs in the city of Ottawa. To address this inequity, we recruited and trained four community research peers who were representative of the study target population (ex- or currently homeless, insecurely housed or multi-drug users). We designed the ten-step Ottawa Citizen Engagement and Action Model (OCEAM) for the PROMPT study. In this paper we have described this process in a step-by-step fashion, as used in the PROMPT study. The eighty PROMPT participants are being followed for six months and are being provided with free and off-label Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT). Abstract: Objectives The PROMPT study, Participatory Research in Ottawa, Management and Point-of-care of Tobacco, is a prospective cohort study which utilizes community-based participation and social network-based approaches to address tobacco dependence in inner city Ottawa. The project was designed to: facilitate retention of participants; to understand the barriers and facilitators of smoking; optimize ways to manage, reduce, and quit tobacco use among people who use drugs in Ottawa, Canada. The purpose of this paper is to describe the processes utilized in citizen or patient engagement in academic research, through our tobacco dependence management project in the inner city population in Ottawa, Canada. Background: Tobacco smoking is inequitably distributed in Canada with rates at 12 % in Ottawa, as compared to 18 % in rest of Canada. However, the PROUD Study (Participatory Research in Ottawa: Understanding Drugs) demonstrated that 96 % of the inner city population, of Ottawa currently smoke tobacco. This distinct inequity in tobacco use translates into inequitable distribution of health outcomes, such morbidity and mortality in this population. Consequently, a community-based participatory, peer-led research project was conducted in the inner city population of Ottawa. Methods: We recruited and trained four community research peers who were representative of the study target population. We conceived, designed and operationalized the ten-step Ottawa Citizen Engagement and Action Model (OCEAM) for the PROMPT study. The peers have co-led all aspects of the project from conceptualizing the study question to participating in knowledge translation. Each step of the project had defined objectives and outcome measures. Discussion: The involvement of peers in recruitment ensured representation of tobacco and drug users—individuals truly representative of the intended target population. Peer, participant engagement and trust was established from the conception of the project. For historical and self-evident reasons, trust and engagement is rarely found in this population. Peers successfully participated in all ten steps of the Citizen Engagement and Action model. The PROMPT study utilized the CBPR (Community Based Participatory research) approach to encourage engagement and build trust in a difficult to reach and hard to treat, inner city population. The ten-step OCEAM model was conceived, designed and operationalized and the PROMPT study will continue to follow the eighty PROMPT participants for six months to understand the optimal ways to manage, reduce, and quit smoking within an inner city population.