Search

BackgroundThere is growing concern about moral distress and injury associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in healthcare professions. This study aimed to quantify the nature, frequency, severity and duration of the problem in the public health professional workforce.MethodsBetween 14 December 2021 and 23 February 2022, Faculty of Public Health (FPH) members were surveyed about their experiences of moral distress before and during the pandemic.ResultsIn total, 629 FPH members responded, of which, 405 (64%; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 61–68%) reported one or more experience of moral distress associated with their own action (or inaction), and 163 (26%; 95%CI = 23–29%) reported experiencing moral distress associated with a colleague’s or organization’s action (or inaction) since the start of the pandemic. The majority reported moral distress being more frequent during the pandemic and that the effects endured for over a week. In total, 56 respondents (9% of total sample, 14% of those with moral distress), reported moral injury severe enough to require time off work and/or therapeutic help.ConclusionsMoral distress and injury are significant problems in the UK public health professional workforce, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. There is urgent need to understand the causes and potential options for its prevention, amelioration and care.

Zusammenfassung Public Health als wissenschaftliche Multidisziplin („Gesundheitswissenschaften“) und Institution orientiert sich an Werten. Werte sind das, was Menschen anstreben und als moralisch gut ansehen, beispielsweise „Gesundheit“ und „Öffentlichkeit“. Werte liegen moralischen Urteilen zugrunde. Muss man moralische Urteile begründen und Handeln rechtfertigen? Dieser Artikel plädiert für eine positive Antwort. Institutionelles und professionelles Handeln in Public Health braucht ethische Reflexion.

Objective: To explore the experiences of midwives in Indonesia on the provision of maternal health ser-vices during the COVID-19 pandemic.Design and methods: A qualitative descriptive study using focus group discussions was undertaken. Aconventional content analysis was used to analyze the data. Coding categories were generated from thetranscripts.Setting and participants: Twenty-two midwives from five community health centers of three regions inthe Province of Jambi, Indonesia were included.Findings: The interviewees shared similar barriers and facilitators in delivering the services, includingthe unavailability of adequate protective equipment, the limitation of the number of services, and deal-ing with the new public health measures related to the COVID-19. Overall, midwives demonstrated acontinued commitment to provide maternal health services during the pandemic.Key conclusions and implications for practice: Significant changes in service delivery have been made tocomply with pandemic related restrictions. Despite the unprecedentedly difficult working environment,the midwives continue to provide adequate services to the community by implementing a strict healthprotocol. Findings from this study contribute to a better understanding of how the quality of the serviceschanged, as well as how new challenges can be addressed and positive changes can be reinforced

Evidence-based health promotion and disease prevention require incorporating evidence of the effectiveness of interventions into policy and practice. With the entry into force of the German Act to Strengthen Health Promotion and Prevention (PrävG), interventions that take place in people's everyday living environments have gained in importance. Decision-makers need to assess whether an evidence-based intervention is transferable to their specific target context. The Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA) recommends that transferability of an intervention should be clarified before any decision to implement it. Furthermore, transferability needs to be finally determined after an evaluation in the target context. In this article, we elaborate on theoretical and practical implications of the concept of transferability for health promotion and disease prevention based on the Population-Intervention-Environment-Transfer Models of Transferability (PIET-T). We discuss how decision-makers can anticipate transferability prior to the intervention transfer with the help of transferability criteria and how they can take transferability into account in the further process. This includes the steps of the analysis of a health problem and identification of effective interventions, the steps of the initial transferability assessment and identification of the need for adaptation, and the steps of the implementation and evaluation. Considering transferability is a complex task that comes with challenges. But it offers opportunities to select a suitable intervention for a target context and, in the transfer process, to understand the conditions under which the intervention works in this context. This knowledge helps to establish an evidence base, which is practically relevant.Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention erfordern die Einbettung effektiver Interventionen in Politik und Praxis. Mit dem Inkrafttreten des Präventionsgesetzes (PrävG) haben Interventionen, die in der Lebenswelt der Menschen stattfinden, an Bedeutung gewonnen. Entscheidungsträger müssen beurteilen, ob eine evidenzbasierte Intervention auf ihren spezifischen Zielkontext übertragbar ist. Die Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA) empfiehlt, die Übertragbarkeit vor jeder Entscheidung zur Implementierung einer Intervention zu klären. Darüber hinaus muss die Übertragbarkeit nach einer Evaluation im Zielkontext endgültig bestimmt werden. In diesem Artikel elaborieren wir theoretische und praktische Implikationen des Konzepts der Übertragbarkeit für Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention auf der Grundlage der „Population (P)-Intervention (I)-Environment (E)-Transfer (T) Models of Transferability (PIET-T)“. Wir diskutieren, wie Übertragbarkeit mithilfe von Übertragbarkeitskriterien für die Entscheidungsfindung vor dem Interventionstransfer antizipiert und im weiteren Prozess berücksichtigt werden kann. Dies umfasst die Schritte der Analyse eines Gesundheitsproblems und der Ermittlung wirksamer Interventionen, die Schritte des initialen Assessments der Übertragbarkeit und der Ermittlung des Adaptionsbedarfs sowie die Schritte der Implementierung und Evaluation. Die Betrachtung von Übertragbarkeit ist eine komplexe Aufgabe, die mit Herausforderungen verbunden ist. Sie bietet jedoch das Potenzial, eine geeignete Intervention für den Zielkontext auszuwählen und im Transferprozess die Bedingungen zu verstehen, unter denen die Intervention in diesem Kontext funktioniert. Dieses Wissen hilft, eine Evidenzbasis aufzubauen, die praktisch relevant ist.

Aim: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the major health challenges of the future, but the concrete impact of counteracting measures is still unclear. To study possible outcomes within the European Union, a scenario analysis for the year 2050 was performed on the possible influence of the European Commission (EC). Methods: Scenario planning and development of strategies based on different scenarios. Results: Rational use of antimicrobials in animals and humans, surveillance and monitoring, new antimicrobial therapies, travel and globalization, exposure to the environment, and awareness were recognized as the main driving elements. Four Scenarios were developed: An efficient and impli-cated EC sorts out AMR; An implicated but unsuccessful EC withstands AMR; AMR is managed regardless of the EC disinterest; and A neutral and inefficient EC fails to manage AMR. Conclusion: All the strategies developed on the basis of the four scenarios probe for an increase in European Union's dedication to achieve positive outcomes. These include the development of effective legislation and international coordination. Acknowledgment: Peter Schröder-Bäck, Helmut Brand and Kiranjeet Kaur’s contribution is co-funded through a grant of the European Commission within the Erasmus+ programme (Project: Prevent it. Project reference: 598515-EPP-1-2018-1-IN-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP). Conflict of interests: None declared., South Eastern European Journal of Public Health (SEEJPH), Volume XVI, 2021

In this paper we describe the process and content of our ad hoc public health ethics consultation for a Bavarian health authority in relation to Covid-19.In diesem Dokument beschreiben wir den Prozess und den Inhalt einer ad hoc Public-Health-Ethikberatung vom 22. März 2020 für eine regionale Gesundheitsbehörde (Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit) zu Entscheidungen im Zusammenhang mit Covid-19.

Information is clearly vital to public health, but the acquisition and use of public health data elicit serious privacy concerns. One strategy for navigating this dilemma is to build 'trust' in institutions responsible for health information, thereby reducing privacy concerns and increasing willingness to contribute personal data. This strategy, as currently presented in public health literature, has serious shortcomings. But it can be augmented by appealing to the philosophical analysis of the concept of trust. Philosophers distinguish trust and trustworthiness from cognate attitudes, such as confident reliance. Central to this is value congruence: trust is grounded in the perception of shared values. So, the way to build trust in institutions responsible for health data is for those institutions to develop and display values shared by the public. We defend this approach from objections, such as that trust is an interpersonal attitude inappropriate to the way people relate to organisations. The paper then moves on to the practical application of our strategy. Trust and trustworthiness can reduce privacy concerns and increase willingness to share health data, notably, in the context of internal and external threats to data privacy. We end by appealing for the sort of empirical work our proposal requires.

The Maternal Mortality Ratio in Indonesia has remained high, making it a national priority. The low utilization of maternal health services at community health centers is considered to be one of the reasons for poor maternal health status. This study aims to assess the influence of sociodemographic factors on utilization of maternal health services. The analysis was completed using binary and logistic regression to examine the association between sociodemographic variables and maternal health services utilization. A total of 436 women participated in the survey. In the multivariable analysis, age, education, ethnicity, parity status, distance to health centers and insurance ownership were associated with the utilization of maternal health services. Ethnicity (OR, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.4–3.3) and distance to the CHC (OR, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.3–0.8) were significantly associated with ANC visits. The association between parity and place of delivery was statistically significant (OR, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.5–1.4). A positive association between basic health insurance ownership and PNC services was reported (OR, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1–0.6). Several sociodemographic factors were positively associated with the utilization of maternal health services at the CHCs. The required measures to improve the utilization of maternal health services at the CHCs level have to take into consideration the sociodemographic factors of reproductive age women.

Introduction Public trust in the health system is essential to control the Covid-19 pandemic. It can influence the extent to which interventions to combat a pandemic are accepted by citizens. The objective of this review was to map the evidence of measurements of the concept of public trust in the health system with a focus on health system institutions. Methods We performed a systematic literature search in the databases Web of Science and Embase in March 2020. Quantitative studies measuring trust on a system level with regard to healthcare were eligible if they addressed the general public and were published in English or German. We excluded studies that measured trust on an interpersonal level, in a single health profession, or a single treatment. We extracted data to map the characteristics of measurements. Results Of initially 7137 identified articles, 87 studies were included in the mapping. In 58 (67%) of the studies, trust was the outcome variable. Most studies (69%) measured the level of trust with single items, 27 studies (31%) used scales or indices to measure the concept of trust. Of these, 12 studies measured healthcare system trust, 7 trust in government and political institutions, 4 trust in healthcare organisations, 3 trust in health insurances, and 1 trust in health data management institutions. Most common domains of trust in the healthcare system refer to policies, quality of services, communication and provision of information, relationships with providers and their expertise, and quality of cooperation between providers. Theoretical dimensions of the concept of trust include fidelity, competency, trustworthiness, integrity and global trust. Conclusions Few quantitative studies examine dimensions of public trust on a health system level. Future country-specific research on the concept of public trust may support the understanding of context-specific determinants for the tailoring of interventions to promote trust in health systems. Key messages Public trust is an important aspect for controlling a pandemic, as it is a precondition for accepting interventions, such as vaccination programmes. Country-specific research may promote the understanding of public trust and the tailoring of interventions to increase health system trust.

Developments in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) and cell-free fetal DNA analysis raise the possibility that antenatal services may soon be able to support couples in non-invasively testing for, and diagnosing, an unprecedented range of genetic disorders and traits coded within their unborn child’s genome. Inevitably, this has prompted debate within the bioethics literature about what screening options should be offered to couples for the purpose of reproductive choice. In relation to this problem, the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) and American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) tentatively recommend that any expansion of this type of screening, as facilitated by NIPT, should be limited to serious congenital and childhood disorders. In support of this recommendation, the ESHG and ASHG cite considerations of distribution justice. Notably, however, an account of justice in the organization and provision of this type of screening which might substantiate this recommendation has yet to be developed. This paper attempts to redress this oversight through an investigation of Norman Daniels’ theory of Just health: meeting health needs fairly. In line with this aim, the paper examines what special moral importance (for Just health) screening for the purpose of reproductive choice might have where concerning serious congenital and childhood disorders in particular. The paper concludes that screening for reproductive choice where concerning serious congenital and childhood disorders may be important for providing women with fair opportunity to protect their health (by either having or not having an affected child).

International guidelines recommend that prenatal screening for fetal abnormalities should only be offered within a non-directive framework aimed at enabling women in making meaningful reproductive choices. Whilst this position is widely endorsed, developments in cell-free fetal DNA based Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing are now raising questions about its continued suitability for guiding screening policy and practice. This issue is most apparent within debates on the scope of the screening offer. Implied by the aim of enabling meaningful reproductive choices is the idea that screening services should support women in accessing prenatal tests that best enable them to realize the types of reproductive choice that they find important. However, beyond whatever options meet the quality standards required for facilitating an informed decision, the remaining criteria of facilitating autonomous choice is strictly non-directive. As a result, policy makers receive little indication prior to consultation with each individual woman, about what conditions should be prioritized during the offer of screening. In this paper we try to address this issue by using the capabilities approach to further specify the non-directive aim of enabling meaningful reproductive choice. The resulting framework is then used to assess the relative importance of offering prenatal screening where concerning different types of genetic condition. We conclude that greater priority may be ascribed to offering prenatal screening for conditions that more significantly diminish a woman's central capabilities. It follows that serious congenital and earlier-onset conditions are more likely to fulfill these criteria.

Objectives: Evidence that health interventions work is not enough to ensure implementation into policy and practice. The complexity of public health systems requires more diverse actions. This paper proposes a conceptual model to enhance understanding of interlinking factors that influence the evidence implementation process. Methods: A literature review was conducted to explore factors that influence the process of evidence implementation in complex public health systems, including research findings and observations from 32 case studies of injury prevention interventions underway in 24 countries and results from evidence research networks. Concepts and themes identified through a critical review were organised, ordered and interlinked to build the model. Results: An Evidence Implementation Model for Public Health Systems and four concepts or themes: Evidence implementation target; Actors involved in implementation; Knowledge transfer; and Barriers and facilitators to evidence implementation were developed to provide a simplified, yet broad framework that highlights multiple factors and back and forth inter-linkages within and between the concepts that influence the uptake of evidence into public health systems policy and practice. Conclusions: Understanding the factors discussed within and amongst the four concepts of this model should ultimately help to positively influence the uptake of evidence into real world public health systems. This model has relevance for decision makers, researchers, knowledge brokers, and implementers.

Children’s rights to autonomy of choice are differently expressed throughout Europe. We explored differences regarding expressions of respect for children’s autonomy throughout Europe, using the procedure of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination offer as indicator. We used a mixed methods approach, utilizing an expert survey within the frame of “Models of Child Health Appraised” (MOCHA), among all 30 European Union (EU) and European Economic Area states. A questionnaire was designed using vignettes regarding the vaccine provision. Thirty MOCHA country agents were invited to respond from June 2017 to April 2018. In total, 28 country agents responded. We studied the following themes: (i) provision of informed consent, (ii) parental and medical paternalism, (iii) relevance of the child’s chronological age or maturity, and (iv) vaccination programs targeting boys. These are being handled differently across the region. We explored associations of these implemented practices with the national vaccine coverage rate across Europe. We used the processes of HPV vaccination to study child’s autonomy, the paradigm change toward libertarian paternalism and issues of sex-equity. Interestingly, greater respect for children’s autonomy tends to be associated with medium or high vaccination coverage rates and lower respect with lower rates. Respect and empowerment seem to have practical as well as moral benefits. Identifying and transferring the most suitable ethical approaches is crucial and should be strengthened.

IntroductionPublic health ethics is a growing field of academic interest but ethical discussion of injury prevention seems to have received limited attention. Interventions that promise to be effective are not necessarily—without explicit justification—‘good’ and ‘right’ interventions in every sense. This paper explores public health ethics in the context of child injury prevention with the objective to initiate interdisciplinary dialogue on the ethics of child safety interventions.MethodA framework of seven public health ethics principles (non-maleficence, health maximisation, beneficence, respect for autonomy, justice, efficiency and proportionality) were applied to an intervention to promote child safety in the home.ResultsPreventing child injury in the home is ethically challenging due to the requirement for the state to intervene in the private sphere. Non-maleficence and beneficence are difficult to judge within this intervention as these are likely to be highly dependent on the nature of intervention delivery, in particular, the quality of communication. Respect for autonomy is challenged by an intervention occurring in the home. The socioeconomic gradient in child injury risk is an important factor but a nuanced approach could help to avoid exacerbating inequalities or stigmatisation. Equally, a nuanced approach may be necessary to accommodate the principles of proportionality and efficiency within the local context.ConclusionWe conclude that this intervention is justifiable from an ethical perspective but that this type of reflection loop is helpful to identify the impact of interventions beyond effectiveness.

Impfempfehlungen und personliche Impfentscheidungen konnen nicht allein auf Basis wissenschaftlicher Evidenz getroffen werden. Ob und unter welchen Bedingungen geimpft werden soll, kann nur im konkreten Kontext und mit zusatzlichem argumentativen Rekurs auf ethische Normen und Werte bestimmt werden. Dieser Artikel bietet einen normativen Rahmen einer Impfethik an, der sich auf individual- und sozialethische Prinzipien und Argumentationen bezieht, und diskutiert in der Literatur angebotene Entscheidungshilfen. Aus einer Gerechtigkeitsperspektive heraus werden die besonderen Herausforderungen eines gesundheitskompetenten und autonomen Verhaltens dabei genauso betont wie die in Deutschland herausgehobene Stellung der Standigen Impfkommission (STIKO).

The reduction of Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) remains a global health issue. Although major progress has been achieved in the past 15 years, the ratio is still high, especially in Low Middle-Income Countries. In the Southeast Asian region, most of the countries have not reached the Sustainable Development Goals target yet. Although the countries have several similarities in many aspects, such as community characteristics, cultural context, health systems, and geographical proximity, the MMR in the region presents interesting variations. The scope of this systematic review is to explore published literature on the utilization of maternal health services at the community healthcare centre setting in Southeast Asian countries. The databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched systematically to identify quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies published in 2000-2020. A total of 1876 records were found, out of which 353 full text were screened. Finally, 27 studies on utilization of maternal health services met the inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis from seven Southeast Asian countries: Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, The Philippines, Timor Leste and Vietnam. Most of the articles focused on the utilization of maternal health services at primary health care setting. Several themes on maternal health services utilization in the countries emerged, including cultural and socioeconomic factors contributed to the utilization of maternal health services, factors associated with the low utilization of ANC, determinants affected place of delivery and delivery assistance choice. The utilization of maternal health services at primary healthcare setting in seven Southeast Asian countries was identified in a small number of studies. Sociocultural barriers and disparities of health services provision are the major factors associated with low utilization of the services. Further research on strengthening the role of primary healthcare in maternal health services provision is required.

Dieser Beitrag stellt aus ethischer Perspektive Herausforderungen fur die polizeiliche Arbeit zur Zeit der „Coronakrise“ in Deutschland dar. Spannungsfelder der konkreten (alltaglichen und moglichen) Polizeiarbeit vor dem Hintergrund dieser Pandemie werden ebenso beschrieben wie moralische Normen und Werte sowie ethische Theorien, die berufliches Polizeihandeln und die Setzung staatlicher Rahmenbedingungen fur polizeiliches Handeln in dieser Phase leiten konnen und sollen. Public-health-ethische Ansatze werden dabei mit Perspektiven der polizeilichen Berufsethik koharent integriert. Die Priorisierung von knappen Ressourcen, darunter auch Vakzinen, wird diskutiert und es wird argumentiert, dass es aus ethischer Sicht gute Grunde gibt, Polizistinnen und Polizisten bei der Verfugbarwerdung sicherer und effektiver Impfstoffe eine hohe Prioritatsstufe zu geben.

Background Evidence-based policies should underpin successful implementation of innovations within child health care. The EU-funded Models of Child Health Appraised project enabled research into effective methods to communicate research evidence. The objective of this study was to identify and categorize methods to communicate evidence-based research recommendations and means to tailor this to stakeholder audiences. Methods We conducted an online survey among national stakeholders in child health. Analysis of the most effective strategies to communicate research evidence and reach the target audience was carried out in order to ensure implementation of optimal child health care models at a national level. Results Representatives of stakeholders from 21 of the then 30 EU MS and EEA countries responded to the questionnaire. Three main approaches in defining the strategies for effective communication of research recommendations were observed, namely: dissemination of information, involvement of stakeholders and active attitude towards change expressed in actions. The target audience for communicating recommendations was divided into two layers: proximal, which includes those who are remaining in close contact with the child, and distal, which contains those who are institutionally responsible for high quality of child health services. They should be recipients of evidence-based results communicated by different formats, such as scientific, administrative, popular and personal. Conclusions Influential stakeholders impact the process of effective research dissemination and guide necessary actions to strengthen the process of effective communication of recommendations. Communication of evidence-based results should be targeted to each audience’s profile, both professional and non-professionals, by adjusting appropriate communication formats.

Background Public health professionals face decisions that have far-reaching ethical implications. Despite this, the field of public health ethics is relatively new, and teaching and training in ethics for public health professionals is “highly variable in quantity and content” [Doudenkova et al 2017]. Building on a prior body of research, surveys of ASPHER and EUPHA members were undertaken to explore current levels of ethics education. Methods Online surveys were distributed to ASPHER and EUPHA members with the aims of a) exploring the current status of ethics education in public health courses in ASPHER institutions and b) understanding the ethics education of individual public health practitioners in EUPHA. Results The ASPHER survey was completed by teaching staff at 35 different institutions between April and August 2019. The EUPHA survey was completed by 232 professionals between October 2019 and January 2020. ASPHER Survey: 39% (n = 12) of institutions awarding master's degrees in public health had one or more degrees in which no ethics was taught. Only 48% (n = 13) of institutions had someone in their academic team formally qualified to teach ethics by holding a master's degree, PhD or further academic role in ethics. EUPHA Survey: Despite 79% (n = 165) of respondents encountering ethical dilemmas on at least a monthly basis, 21% (n = 48) reported that they had never had any ethics education or training, and 50% (n = 101) respondents thought that they had too little training in ethics for their professional role. Conclusions There remains a significant proportion of those studying or working in public health who do not receive any public health ethics training or education. Key messages Ethics education in public health remains variable among ASPHER organisations and EUPHA members, a significant minority lacking any ethics training. To ensure ethically reflective and sensitive public health practitioners, access to ethics education is key.

Background To improve the health of different populations, health systems need healthcare professionals who are able to innovate health services. In order to empower students from various healthcare professions to change health service practice in a sustainable way, a training was developed based on the PIET-T models of transferability (Schloemer & Schröder-Bäck, 2018). It was evaluated at three universities in Germany and the Netherlands. Objective The aims of the training were to enable students to: 1. Critically analyze existing evidence about successful and unsuccessful transfers of evidence-based interventions to specific “real-world” contexts (1 day), 2. Conduct an assessment of transferability with case studies using problem-based learning (1 day), 3. Practice implementation research in a healthcare organization (4 months, 4 hours/week). The training was evaluated through discussions, a written reflection and a questionnaire in order to understand students' learning experiences. Results Two bachelor programs for occupational, physical and speech therapists, and one master program for public health professionals took part from 09/2019 to 03/2020, including 66 students. Students valued the training as important, 73 % found it helpful for professional practice. They reflected various ideas how to use the PIET-T models for practice change. Although the implementation research process was perceived as high workload, students valued the experience of getting to know barriers and solutions in a practical setting. Conclusions The students of all programs value the practical relevance of teaching with profession-related specifications. Practical application of the PIET-T models opens up new approaches in teaching in order to educate knowledge on improvement of health services in different contexts. Key messages Empowering students to improve healthcare requires practical training. Training on transferability helps students develop skills for improvement of health services.

Background The outbreak of SARS in 2002 lead to a public health ethics discourse. The crisis management of that time was ethically analysed and lessons to be learned discussed. Scholarship and WHO, among others, developed an ethics of pandemic preparedness. The current “corona crisis” also faces us with ethical challenges. This presentation is comparing the two crises from an ethical point of view and a focus on Europe. Methods An ethics framework for pandemic preparedness (Schröder et al. 2006 and Schröder-Bäck 2014) is used to make a synopsis of ethical issues. Ethical aspects of 2002 and 2020 that were discussed in the literature and in the media are compared. For 2020, the focus is on interventions in Italy, Germany, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. Results Topics that emerged from the 2002 crisis were, among others, revolving around aspects of stigmatisation and fair distribution of scarce resources (esp. vaccines, antivirals). Currently, most urgent and ethically challenging aspects relate to social distancing vs. autonomy: Isolation and quarantine are handled differently across Europe and the EU. Questions of transferability of such interventions prevail. Contexts vary vertically over time (2002 vs. 2020) and horizontally (e.g. between Italy and Germany at the same time). Furthermore, trust in authorities, media and health information is a key issue. Conclusions Ethical aspects are key for good pandemic preparedness and management. The context of the crises between 2002 and 2020 has slightly changed, also based on “lessons learned” from 2002. This has implications on ethical issues that are being discussed. New lessons will have to be learned from the 2020 crisis. Key messages Pandemic preparedness and outbreak management entail many ethical tensions that need to be addressed. Currently, questions of trust and transferability are key to the crisis management, further ethical issues could still emerge.

This article provides a high level picture of the developments in organ transplantation in the European Union (EU) between 2009 and 2015. This was the period during which the European Commission and EU-28 Member States developed an EU Action Plan on organ donation and transplantation. This plan was adopted by the European Commission in 2008, following calls for policy action to increase transplant numbers. It set out priority actions for Member States and European Commission to address. This article describes the three main approaches used by the European Commission and National Competent Authorities to develop this Action Plan. We also present a quantitative comparison of 2015 and 2008 transplant data, based on the Newsletter Transplant by the Council of Europe (CoE) and the Spanish National Transplant Agency (ONT). This comparison shows contributions of different EU Member States, as well as of different donation and transplant programs to the overall increase of 4597 transplants per year (+16.4%). While another evaluation study of the Action Plan reported a strong positive impact of the Action Plan, it is beyond the remit of this publication to demonstrate a causal relationship between the EU Action Plan and the increase in number of organ transplants.

Background Making the case for investing in public health by illustrating the social, economic and environmental value of public health interventions is imperative. Economic methodologies to help capture the social value of public health interventions such as Social Return on Investment (SROI) and Social Cost-Benefit Analysis (SCBA) have been developed over past decades. The life course approach in public health reinforces the importance of investment to ensure a good start in life to safeguarding a safe, healthy and active older age. This novel review maps an overview of the application of SROI and SCBA in the existing literature to identify the social value of public health interventions at individual stages of the life course. Methods A systematic scoping review was conducted on peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify SROI and SCBA studies of public health interventions published between January 1996 and June 2019. All primary research articles published in the English language from high-income countries that presented SROI and SCBA outputs were included. Studies were mapped into stages of the life course, and data on the characteristics of the studies were extracted to help understand the application of social value methodology to assess the value of public health interventions. Results Overall 40 SROI studies were included in the final data extraction, of which 37 were published in the grey literature. No SCBA studies were identified in the search. Evidence was detected at each stage of the life course which included; the birth, neonatal period, postnatal period and infancy (n = 2); childhood and adolescence (n = 17); adulthood (main employment and reproductive years) (n = 8); and older adulthood (n = 6). In addition, 7 studies were identified as cross-cutting across the life course in their aims. Conclusion This review contributes to the growing evidence base that demonstrates the use of social value methodologies within the field of public health. By mapping evidence across stages of the life course, this study can be used as a starting point by public health professionals and institutions to take forward current thinking about moving away from traditional economic measures, to capturing social value when investing in interventions across the life course.

Background: Increasing healthcare expenditures have triggered a trend from volume to value by linking patient outcome to costs. This concept first described as value-based healthcare (VBHC) by Michael Porter is especially applicable for chronic conditions. This article aims to explore the applicability of the VBHC framework to the chronic kidney disease (CKD) care area. Methods: The 4 dimensions of VBHC (measure value; set and communicate value benchmarking; coordinate care; payment to reward value-add) were explored for the CKD care area. Available data was reviewed focusing on CKD initiatives in Europe to assess to what extent each of the 4 dimensions of VBHC have been applied in practice. Results: Translating VBHC into value-based renal care (VBRC) seems to be initiated to a limited extent in European health systems. In most cases not all dimensions of VBHC have been utilized in the renal care initiatives. Conclusion: The translation of VBHC into VBRC is possible and even desirable if an optimal treatment pathway for CKD patients could be achieved. This would require an organizational change in health system set up and should include a strategy focusing on full care responsibility. The patient outcome perspective and health economic analysis need to be the centre of attention.

Evidence about the magnitude and determinants of medication intake adherence among patients and the general population in Southeastern Europe is scant.To assess the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of medication intake adherence among adult primary health-care (PHC) users in Albania.A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2018-2019 in a representative sample of 1553 adult PHC users (response: 94%) selected probabilistically from 5 major regions of Albania. There were 849 (55%) women and 704 (45%) men, with a mean age 54.6 (16.4) years. A structured interviewer-administered questionnaire inquired about medication intake adherence prescribed by family physicians, and sociodemographic characteristics. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the sociodemographic correlates of medication intake adherence.Three hundred (19.8%) participants did not take the prescribed medication. In multivariable-adjusted logistic model, significant correlates of nonintake of medication included rural residence, low educational level, unemployment and low economic level. Among these 300 participants, 273 (91%) considered the high cost of the drugs as a reason for not taking the medication.We found a high prevalence of nonintake of medication prescribed by family physicians. Decision-makers and policy-makers in Albania and elsewhere should consider the provision of essential drugs free of charge or at low cost to low socioeconomic groups and other vulnerable and marginalized population categories, because the costs of noncompliance will eventually be higher.الانتشار والارتباطات الاجتماعية السكانية للالتزام بتناول الدواء بين مستخدمي الرعاية الصحية الأولية في ألبانيا.دجانا روشي، جينك بورازيري، سالفاتوري إيطاليا، بيتر شرودر-بيك، ألبان إيلي، هيلموت براند.لا توجد أدلة تُذكر على حجم الالتزام بتناول الدواء ومحدداته بين المرضى وعموم السكان في جنوب شرق أوروبا.هدفت هذه الدراسة إلى تقييم مدى الانتشار والارتباطات الاجتماعية السكانية للالتزام بتناول الدواء بين مستخدمي الرعاية الصحية الأولية في ألبانيا.أُجريت دراسة مقطعية في عامي 2018-2019 على عينة مُثِّلة ضمت 1553 من مستخدمي الرعاية الصحية الأولية من البالغين (الاستجابة: 94٪) وقد اختيروا باحتمالية من 5 مناطق رئيسية في ألبانيا. واشتملت العينة على 849 امرأة (55٪) و 704 رجلً (45٪)، وبلغ متوسط أعمارهم 54.6 سنة (16.4). واستفسر استبيان منظم يديره محاور عن الالتزام بتناول الأدوية الموصوفة من أطباء الأسرة، والخصائص الاجتماعية السكانية لذلك. واستُخدم الانحدار اللوجستي الثنائي لتقييم الارتباطات الاجتماعية السكانية للالتزام بتناول الدواء.لم يتناول ثلاثمائة مشارك (19.8٪) الدواء الموصوف. وفي النموذج اللوجستي المُعدَّل متعدد المتغيرات، اشتملت الارتباطت المهمة لعدم تناول الدواء على الإقامة الريفية، وانخفاض المستوى التعليمي، والبطالة، وانخفاض المستوى الاقتصادي. ومن بين المشاركين البالغ عددهم 300 شخص، اعتبر 273 (91٪) ارتفاع تكلفة الأدوية سببًا لعدم تناولها.وجدنا ارتفاع معدل انتشار عدم تناول الأدوية التي يصفها أطباء الأسرة. وينبغي لصناع القرار وصناع السياسات في ألبانيا وفي أماكن أخرى أن ينظروا في توفير الأدوية الأساسية مجانًا أو بتكلفة منخفضة جدًا للفئات الاجتماعية الاقتصادية المنخفضة وغيرها من الفئات السكانية الضعيفة والمهمشة، لأن تكاليف عدم الامتثال ستكون أعلى في نهاية المطاف.Prévalence et corrélats sociodémographiques de l'observance thérapeutique chez les usagers des soins de santé primaires en Albanie.Les données sur l’ampleur et les déterminants de l’observance thérapeutique chez les patients et dans la population générale en Europe du Sud-Est sont rares.Évaluer la prévalence et les corrélats sociodémographiques de l'observance thérapeutique chez les usagers des soins de santé primaires adultes en Albanie.Une étude transversale a été menée en 2018-2019 auprès d'un échantillon représentatif de 1553 adultes usagers des soins de santé primaires (taux de réponse : 94 %) sélectionnés de manière aléatoire dans cinq grandes régions d'Albanie. Il s’agissait de 849 femmes (55 %) et 704 hommes (45 %), dont l’âge moyen était de 54,6 ans (16,4). Un questionnaire structuré administré par un enquêteur a permis de s'enquérir de l'observance thérapeutique pour les médicaments prescrits par les médecins de famille, et des caractéristiques sociodémographiques. La régression logistique binaire a été utilisée pour évaluer les corrélats sociodémographiques de l’observance thérapeutique.Trois cents participants (19,8 %) n'ont pas pris les médicaments prescrits. Dans le modèle logistique ajusté multivarié, les corrélats significatifs de la non-prise de médicaments comprenaient la résidence rurale, le faible niveau d'éducation, le chômage et le faible niveau économique. Parmi ces 300 participants, 273 (91 %) ont considéré le coût élevé des médicaments comme une raison de ne pas les prendre.Nous avons constaté une forte prévalence de la non-prise de médicaments prescrits par les médecins de famille. Les décideurs et les responsables de l’élaboration des politiques en Albanie et ailleurs devraient envisager la fourniture de médicaments essentiels gratuitement ou à un coût très bas pour les groupes à faible revenu et les autres catégories de population vulnérables et marginalisées, car le coût de la non-observance sera en fin de compte plus élevé.

Background: Injury to children in Europe, resulting in both death and disability, constitutes a significant burden on individuals, families and society. Inequalities between high and low-income countries are growing. The World Health Organisation Health 2020 strategy calls for inter-sectoral collaboration to address injury in Europe and advocates the whole of government and whole of society approaches to wicked problems. In this study we explore which sectors (e.g. health, transport, education) are relevant for four domains of child safety (intentional injury, water, road and home safety). Methods: We used the organigraph methodology, originally developed to demonstrate how organizations work, to describe the governance of child safety interventions. Members of the European Child Safety Alliance, working in the field of child safety in 24 European countries, drew organigraphs of evidence-based interventions. They included the different actors involved and the processes between them. We analyzed the organigraphs by counting the actors presented and categorizing them into sectors using a pre-defined analysis framework. Results: We received 44 organigraphs from participants in 24 countries. Twenty-seven sectors were identified across the four domains. Nine of the 27 identified sectors were classified as 'core sectors' (education, health, home affairs, justice, media, recreation, research, social/welfare services and consumers). Conclusions: This study reveals the multi-sectoral nature of child safety in practice. It provides information for stakeholders working in child safety to help them implement inter-sectoral child safety interventions taking a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach to health governance.

The efficiency and effectiveness of child safety interventions are determined by the quality of the implementation process. This multinational European study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers for the three phases of implementation: adoption, implementation and monitoring (AIM process). Twenty-seven participants from across the WHO European Region were invited to provide case studies of child safety interventions from their country. Cases were selected by the authors to ensure broad coverage of injury issues, age groups and governance level of implementation (eg, national, regional or local). Each participant presented their case and provided a written account according to a standardised template. Presentations and question and answer sessions were recorded. The presentation slides, written accounts and the notes taken during the workshops were analysed using thematic content analysis to elicit facilitators and barriers. Twenty-six cases (from 26 different countries) were presented and analysed. Facilitators and barriers were identified within eight general themes, applicable across the AIM process: management and collaboration; resources; leadership; nature of the intervention; political, social and cultural environment; visibility; nature of the injury problem and analysis and interpretation. The importance of the quality of the implementation process for intervention effectiveness, coupled with limited resources for child safety makes it more difficult to achieve successful actions. The findings of this study, divided by phase of the AIM process, provide practitioners with practical suggestions, where proactive planning might help increase the likelihood of effective implementation.

AIM: To assess the level of knowledge of the adult users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) regarding their side effects and the socio-demographic factors associated with the use of these drugs in the adult population of Albania.METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study including a representative sample of 199 individuals aged ≥18 years (77% women; overall mean age: 30.3±10.0 years; overall response rate: 90%) who were users of NSAIDs recruited in ten different pharmacies in Tirana municipality during April-May 2015. A self-administered questionnaire contained basic socio-demographic information and questions about NSAIDs use, their types, participants' knowledge about NSAIDs side effects and their interaction with other drugs.RESULTS: In 56% of the cases, NSAIDs were taken by participants' own decisions, whereas in about 29% of the cases these drugs were prescribed by physicians. Acetaminophen, ketoprofen and ibuprofen were the most frequently used NSAIDs. Overall, 51% of participants thought NSAIDs could cause allergic reactions, whereas one third or fewer were aware of each of the following side effects: upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding, hypertension, gastritis, kidney failure, myopathy, osteoporosis. About one third of participants were aware of NSAIDs-other drug interactions, whereas some of them were already taking contraindicated drugs. No significant differences were noticed regarding sex, age, educational level, employment status and marital status, with very few exceptions.CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate limited knowledge about NSAIDs side effects and their interaction with other drugs among the Albania adult population, which is a cause of concern.

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to present the Child Safety Reference Frameworks (CSRF), a policy advice tool that places evidence-based child safety interventions, applicable at the sub-national level, into a framework resembling the Haddon Matrix. Method: The CSRF is based on work done in previous EU funded projects, which we have adapted to the field of child safety. The CSRF were populated following a literature review.Results: Four CSRF were developed for four domains of child safety: road, water and home safety, and intentional injury prevention.Conclusion: The CSRF can be used as a reference, assessment and comparative tool by child safety practitioners and policy makers working at the sub-national level.

Objectives: This study explored views of Moroccan migrant women on barriers and facilitators to the organized breast cancer screening program in Brussels (Belgium), and the potential of targeted printed invitations to increase this population's attendance to the program. Methods: We conducted one expert interview with the breast cancer screening program coordinator on current practices and challenges with regards to inviting Moroccan migrant women in Brussels for screening. Secondly, we held focus groups with Moroccan women aged 26-66. Sessions focused on perspectives on breast cancer screening and the existing generic program invitations. Directed content analysis of transcripts was based on the Health Belief Model. Alternative communication packages were developed based on barriers and suggestions from the focus groups. A second round of focus groups looked at the alternative communication packages and their potential to encourage Moroccan migrant women in Brussels to participate in the organized breast cancer screening program. Results: Alternative packages were appreciated by some, but a number of adjustments did not catch participants' attention. Printed communication delivered by post does not appear to be the preferred means of communication to encourage breast cancer screening for Moroccan migrant women in Brussels, nor does it seem appropriate to address the barriers to screening found in this study. Conclusions: The benefit of targeted postal invitation packages for Moroccan migrant women in Brussels seems limited for a variety of reasons. For future research, a large-scale study analyzing the topic in a cross-cultural perspective is warranted.

Background Currently, measles immunization is high on the agenda of academic and public discourses - on both sides of the Atlantic. In Germany, the discussion of mandatory (measles) immunization was intensively publicly discussed in Spring 2019. Many stakeholders, including federal politicians, plea for mandatory measles immunization. In our paper we analyse the discourse from an ethical point of view. Methods Statements and arguments from German stakeholders in the public debate in 2019 are analysed (among them statements of the federal minister of health, the German Medical Association, NGOs and the National Ethics Council). A vaccination ethics framework and a public trust framework are applied in the analysis. Results Politicians and other public stakeholders debate (measles) immunization and increasingly demand mandatory (measles) vaccination. However, frequently it is unclear which vaccinations or immunization programmes they refer to. They often do ignore the epidemiological situation of immunization rates in Germany, regional differences, relevant target groups and implementation mechanisms, including potential sanctions. This way they simplify the complex problem and offer (populist) simplistic solutions. Normative arguments of stakeholders repeatedly use conceptions of ’autonomy’ and ’harm’; but sometimes also ’solidarity’ is mentioned. Conclusions The call for mandatory measles immunization of school and kindergarten children is offering no adequate and sufficient solution to the problem of elimination of measles. Nevertheless, it contributes to reducing infection risks for the children in care and schooling facilities. Rather, the problem has to be understood in its complexity before discussing the ethical challenges and making effective policy recommendations. When discussing ways to increase immunization rates, ethical values like public trust and solidarity have to be in the foreground - not (only) the debate of autonomy and its restriction. Key messages In German policy discourses 2019, the discussion of “mandatory (measles) vaccination” often shows inaccuracies regarding definitions and facts. These have to be clarified before ethical analysis. Ethical issues regarding the voluntariness of measles vaccination relate also to the ethical concepts of solidarity and public trust and not only to autonomy.

Introduction The complexity of injury and the multi-sectoral nature of its prevention demands a whole-of-society approach. Engaging with civil society in a form of collaborative governance is central to this approach. Civil society, defined as neither state, nor market, nor family, includes organisations such as advocacy groups, charities, professional associations etc. This study looks at the role of civil society organisations in the implementation of child injury prevention interventions in Europe. Methods The method was built upon an existing approach, known as ’organigraphs’. Mintzberg and van der Heyden developed the approach to depict how organisations actually work. We further developed its practical application to explore how interventions in child safety are developed, implemented and monitored across the local, regional, national and EU levels. Professionals working in child safety in 25 European countries were asked to draw organigraphs for an intervention in one of four child injury domains: road, water, home safety or intentional injury prevention. The analysis focused on the action surrounding civil society actors, represented by the connectors leading to and from those actors. Results We received 44 organigraphs in total from 31 participants in 24 countries; nine for intentional injury prevention, nine for water safety, 12 for road safety and 14 for home safety. Civil society actors were present in the majority of Organigraphs and they played multiple and diverse roles including: ’advising’, ’funding’ and ’implementing’ child safety initiatives. Conclusions The role of civil society, described in this data set, appears to be relatively well-developed. Strong, functional and long-standing partnerships between civil society actors across policy sectors and government may lead to greater capacity to address the complexity of child injury. Key messages Effective child injury prevention requires multi-sectoral action to address its complexity. Stakeholders come from the public and private sector and from civil society. Greater engagement with civil society may represent an opportunity for countries and regions to improve their response to the challenges of injury prevention among children.

To adopt and implement innovative good practices across the European Union requires developing policies for different political and constitutional contexts. Health policies are mostly decided by national political processes at different levels. To attain effective advice for policy making and good practice exchange, one has to take different models of governance for health into account. We aimed to explore which concepts of governance research are relevant for implementing child health policies in a European Union context. We argue that taking into account the insights of good intersectoral and multilevel governance in research and practice is essential and promising for future analyses. These governance concepts help to understand what actors and institutions are potentially of relevance for developing and implementing child-centric health care approaches not only within health care but also outside health care. The framework we developed has the potential to advise on and thus support effectively the spreading and implementation of good practices of child-centric health policy approaches across the European Union. With this heuristic framework, the variety of relevant stakeholders and institutions can better be mapped and taken into account in implementation processes. Also, the normative side—particularly stressing values that make governance “good governance”—is to be taken into account.

Vaccination recommendations of public health institutes and personal decisions to get vaccinated cannot be grounded on scientific evidence alone. If and under what conditions vaccinations should take place can only be decided for concrete contexts and accompanied by justification processes applying ethical norms and values.This paper offers a normative framework for vaccination ethics. It reflects the principles and argumentation of individual and social ethics and discusses public health ethical tools available in the literature. The specific challenges of autonomous and health literate behavior from a justice perspective are examined. Also discussed is the position of the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO).Impfempfehlungen und persönliche Impfentscheidungen können nicht allein auf Basis wissenschaftlicher Evidenz getroffen werden. Ob und unter welchen Bedingungen geimpft werden soll, kann nur im konkreten Kontext und mit zusätzlichem argumentativen Rekurs auf ethische Normen und Werte bestimmt werden.Dieser Artikel bietet einen normativen Rahmen einer Impfethik an, der sich auf individual- und sozialethische Prinzipien und Argumentationen bezieht, und diskutiert in der Literatur angebotene Entscheidungshilfen. Aus einer Gerechtigkeitsperspektive heraus werden die besonderen Herausforderungen eines gesundheitskompetenten und autonomen Verhaltens dabei genauso betont wie die in Deutschland herausgehobene Stellung der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO).

The Joint Procurement Agreement (JPA) is an innovative instrument for multi-country procurement of medical countermeasures against cross-border health threats. This paper aims to assess its potential performance. A literature review was conducted to identify key features of successful joint procurement programmes. Documentary analysis and a key informants’ interview were carried out to analyse the European Union (EU) JPA. Ownership, equity, transparency, stable central financing, standardisation, flexibility and gradual development were identified as important prerequisites for successful establishment of multi-country joint procurement programmes in the literature while security of supply, favourable prices, reduction of operational costs and administrative burden and creation of professional expert networks were identified as desirable outcomes. The EU JPA appears to fulfil the criteria of ownership, transparency, equity, flexibility and gradual development. Standardisation is only partly fulfilled and central EU level financing is not provided. Security of supply is an important outcome for all EU Member States (MS). Price savings, reduction in administrative burden and creation of professional networks may be particularly attractive for the smaller MS. The JPA has the potential to increase health system collaboration and efficiency at EU level provided that the incentives for sustained commitment of larger MS are sufficiently attractive.

Research ethics anew gained importance due to the changing scientific landscape and increasing demands and competition in the academic field. These changes are further exaggerated because of scarce(r) resources in some countries on the one hand and advances in genomics on the other. In this paper, we will highlight the current challenges thereof to scientific integrity. To mark key developments in research ethics, we will distinguish between what we call research ethics 1.0 and research ethics 2.0. Whereas research ethics 1.0 focuses on individual integrity and informed consent, research ethics 2.0 entails social scientific integrity within a broader perspective of a research network. This research network can be regarded as a network of responsibilities in which every stakeholder involved has to jointly meet the ethical challenges posed to research. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel