1. Volcanic Drivers of Stratospheric Sulfur in GFDL ESM4
- Author
-
Chloe Yuchao Gao, Vaishali Naik, Larry W. Horowitz, Paul Ginoux, Fabien Paulot, John Dunne, Michael Mills, Valentina Aquila, and Peter Colarco
- Subjects
aerosol modeling ,sulfate aerosols ,stratospheric aerosols ,model development ,climate modeling ,earth system modeling ,Physical geography ,GB3-5030 ,Oceanography ,GC1-1581 - Abstract
Abstract Stratospheric injections of sulfur dioxide from major volcanic eruptions perturb the Earth's global radiative balance and dominate variability in stratospheric sulfur loading. The atmospheric component of the GFDL Earth System Model (ESM4.1) uses a bulk aerosol scheme and previously prescribed the distribution of aerosol optical properties in the stratosphere. To quantify volcanic contributions to the stratospheric sulfur cycle and the resulting climate impact, we modified ESM4.1 to simulate stratospheric sulfate aerosols prognostically. Driven by explicit volcanic emissions of aerosol precursors and non‐volcanic sources, we conduct ESM4.1 simulations from 1989 to 2014, with a focus on the Mt. Pinatubo eruption. We evaluate our interactive representation of the stratospheric sulfur cycle against data from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, Multi‐angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer, Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer, High Resolution Infrared Radiation Sounder, and Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II. To assess the key processes associated with volcanic aerosols, we performed a sensitivity analysis of sulfate burden from the Mt. Pinatubo eruption by varying injection heights, emission amount, and stratospheric sulfate's dry effective radius. We find that the simulated stratospheric sulfate mass burden and aerosol optical depth in the model are sensitive to these parameters, especially volcanic SO2 injection height, and the optimal combination of parameters depends on the metric we evaluate.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF