Search

Figure S1: Endocrine-resistant MCF-7 cells demonstrate sensitivity to TRAIL Figure S2: Endocrine-resistant CSCs demonstrate sensitivity to TRIAL. Figure S3: Primary-derived patient samples. Figure S4: Endocrine-resistant primary and PDX tumour cells are sensitive to TRAIL. Figure S5: Mechanism of endocrine-resistant tumour cell sensitivity to TRAIL.

Purpose: One third of ER-positive breast cancer patients who initially respond to endocrine therapy become resistant to treatment. Such treatment failure is associated with poor prognosis and remains an area of unmet clinical need. Here, we identify a specific posttranslational modification that occurs during endocrine resistance and which results in tumor susceptibility to the apoptosis-inducer TRAIL. This potentially offers a novel stratified approach to targeting endocrine-resistant breast cancer.Experimental Design: Cell line and primary-derived xenograft models of endocrine resistance were investigated for susceptibility to TRAIL. Tumor viability, cancer stem cell (CSC) viability (tumorspheres), tumor growth kinetics, and metastatic burden were assessed. Western blots for the TRAIL-pathway inhibitor, c-FLIP, and upstream regulators were performed. Results were confirmed in primary culture of 26 endocrine-resistant and endocrine-naïve breast tumors.Results: Breast cancer cell lines with acquired resistance to tamoxifen (TAMR) or faslodex were more sensitive to TRAIL than their endocrine-sensitive controls. Moreover, TRAIL eliminated CSC-like activity in TAMR cells, resulting in prolonged remission of xenografts in vivo. In primary culture, TRAIL significantly depleted CSCs in 85% endocrine-resistant, compared with 8% endocrine-naïve, tumors, whereas systemic administration of TRAIL in endocrine-resistant patient-derived xenografts reduced tumor growth, CSC-like activity, and metastases. Acquired TRAIL sensitivity correlated with a reduction in intracellular levels of c-FLIP, and an increase in Jnk-mediated phosphorylation of E3-ligase, ITCH, which degrades c-FLIP.Conclusions: These results identify a novel mechanism of acquired vulnerability to an extrinsic cell death stimulus, in endocrine-resistant breast cancers, which has both therapeutic and prognostic potential. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2452–63. ©2018 AACR.

Purpose The development of oestrogen resistance is a major challenge in managing hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer. Saracatinib (AZD0530), an oral Src kinase inhibitor, prevents oestrogen resistance in animal models and reduces osteoclast activity. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of saracatinib addition to aromatase inhibitors (AI) in patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Methods This phase II multicentre double-blinded randomised trial allocated post-menopausal women to AI with either saracatinib or placebo (1:1 ratio). Patients were stratified into an “AI-sensitive/naïve” group who received anastrozole and “prior-AI” group who received exemestane. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and toxicity. Results 140 patients were randomised from 20 UK centres to saracatinib/AI (n = 69) or placebo/AI (n = 71). Saracatinib was not associated with an improved PFS (3.7 months v. 5.6 months placebo/AI) and did not reduce likelihood of bony progression. There was no benefit in OS or ORR. Effects were consistent in “AI-sensitive/naive” and “prior-AI” sub-groups. Saracatinib was well tolerated with dose reductions in 16% and the main side effects were gastrointestinal, hypophosphatemia and rash. Conclusion Saracatinib did not improve outcomes in post-menopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. There was no observed beneficial effect on bone metastases. CRUKE/11/023, ISRCTN23804370.

Introduction: Endocrine therapy has played an important role in the management of ER positive breast cancer over recent decades. Despite this, not all patients respond equally to endocrine intervention, which can lead to resistance, associated disease relapse and progression. Previous reports suggest that endocrine agents themselves may induce an invasive phenotype in ER positive breast cancers with low/aberrant expression of E-cadherin. Here we investigate this phenomenon further and provide data supporting a role for the ER co-receptor, PELP-1, in mediating an adverse response to endocrine agents.\ud\udMaterials and Methods: The effects of tamoxifen, fulvestrant and estrogen withdrawal (as a model for aromatase inhibitor therapy) on the invasive and migratory capacity of endocrine-sensitive MCF-7 and T47D cells, in the presence or absence of functional E-cadherin and/or PELP-1 (using siRNA knockdown), was assessed via Matrigel invasion and Boyden chamber migration assays. The effects of these endocrine therapies alongside E-cadherin/PELP-1 modulation on cell proliferation were further assessed by MTT assay. Western blotting using phospho-specific antibodies was performed to investigate signalling pathway changes associated with endocrine-induced changes in invasion and migration.\ud\udResults: Both tamoxifen and fulvestrant induced a pro-invasive and pro-migratory phenotype in ER positive breast cancer cells displaying a high basal expression of PELP-1, which was augmented in the context of poor cell-cell contact. This process occurred in a Src-dependent manner with Src inhibition reversing endocrine induced invasion/migration. While this adverse response was observed using both tamoxifen and fulvestrant therapy, it was not observed under conditions of estrogen withdrawal.\ud\udConclusions: Our data confirms previous reports that anti-estrogens induce an adverse cell phenotype in ER+ breast cancer, particularly in the absence of homotypic cell contact. These results implicate E-cadherin and PELP-1 as potential biomarkers when deciding upon optimum adjuvant endocrine therapy, whereby tumours with high PELP-1/low E-cadherin expression may benefit from estrogen withdrawal therapy via aromatase inhibition, as opposed to ER modulation/antagonism.

PURPOSE Previous studies of hypofractionated adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer established a 15- or 16-fraction (fr) regimen as standard. The FAST Trial (CRUKE/04/015) evaluated normal tissue effects (NTE) and disease outcomes after 5-fr regimens. Ten-year results are presented. METHODS Women ≥ 50 years of age with low-risk invasive breast carcinoma (pT1-2 pN0) were randomly assigned to 50 Gy/25 fr (5 weeks) or 30 or 28.5 Gy in 5 once-weekly fr of 6.0 or 5.7 Gy. The primary end point was change in photographic breast appearance at 2 and 5 years; secondary end points were physician assessments of NTE and local tumor control. Odds ratios (ORs) from longitudinal analyses compared regimens. RESULTS A total of 915 women were recruited from 18 UK centers (2004-2007). Five-year photographs were available for 615/862 (71%) eligible patients. ORs for change in photographic breast appearance were 1.64 (95% CI, 1.08 to 2.49; P = .019) for 30 Gy and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.71; P = .686) for 28.5 Gy versus 50 Gy. α/β estimate for photographic end point was 2.7 Gy (95% CI, 1.5 to 3.9 Gy), giving a 5-fr schedule of 28 Gy (95% CI, 26 to 30 Gy) estimated to be isoeffective with 50 Gy/25 fr. ORs for any moderate/marked physician-assessed breast NTE (shrinkage, induration, telangiectasia, edema) were 2.12 (95% CI, 1.55 to 2.89; P < .001) for 30 Gy and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.72; P = .248) for 28.5 Gy versus 50 Gy. With 9.9 years median follow-up, 11 ipsilateral breast cancer events (50 Gy: 3; 30 Gy: 4; 28.5 Gy: 4) and 96 deaths (50 Gy: 30; 30 Gy: 33; 28.5 Gy: 33) have occurred. CONCLUSION At 10 years, there was no significant difference in NTE rates after 28.5 Gy/5 fr compared with 50 Gy/25 fr, but NTE were higher after 30 Gy/5 fr. Results confirm the published 3-year findings that a once-weekly 5-fr schedule of whole-breast radiotherapy can be identified that appears to be radiobiologically comparable for NTE to a conventionally fractionated regimen.

Background: Src, the first proto-oncogene to be described, is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase interacting with multiple oncogenic pathways, including cell proliferation, survival, angiogenesis and osteoclast activity. Src activation occurs in up to 40% of ER+ breast cancers, is linked with poor prognosis, and pre-clinically has been strongly implicated in endocrine resistance. Saracatinib (AZD0530) is a potent, oral selective Src inhibitor that enhances the anti-proliferative effect of endocrine agents in pre-clinical breast cancer models, preventing the development of endocrine-resistance and restoring endocrine sensitivity. In a murine model of prostate bony metastases saracatinib inhibits osteoclast activity, reducing bone resorption and the development and progression of bone lesions. Clinically, saracatinib is generally well-tolerated with mainly gastro-intestinal adverse events (AEs), clinically meaningful durations of stable disease as monotherapy, and partial responses observed in combination with other therapies. Methods: Multi-centre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised phase II trial. Post-menopausal women with advanced/metastatic breast cancer suitable for 1st or 2nd second line hormonal treatment, were randomised to receive an aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus saracatinib 175mg mg/day or placebo. Patients were stratified as either (i) “AI-sensitive/naïve”, who received anastrazole 1mg daily ± saracatinib, or (ii) “prior-AI”, if they had progressed on a non-steroidal AI but were considered likely to retain some endocrine sensitivity, who received exemestane 25mg daily ± saracatinib. Other stratification factors were bone metastases, bisphosphonate use, performance status, and treatment centre. Treatment was until progression, intolerable toxicity or at the patient’s request. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were toxicity, ORR & OS; exploratory endpoints explored molecular correlates in on-treatment samples (including optional biopsies). Results: 140 patients were enrolled from 22 UK sites between August 2012 and April 2015 of whom 69 were in the “AI-sensitive/naïve” group and 71 in the “prior-AI” group; 134 patients were eligible for efficacy evaluation and 136 for safety. Interim safety data analyses by an IDMC identified no new safety signals. Treatment emergent AEs were generally low grade, the most frequent being fatigue (70%) and nausea (49%); AEs occurring significantly (p Conclusions: Saractinib did not improve outcomes in post-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer treated with exemestane with numerically inferior p response rate and PFS, and no apparent beneficial effect on bone metastases. These data do not support further evaluation of saracatinib in combination with AIs. ARISTACAT - Abstract - San Antonio 2019 Citation Format: David Cameron, Stefan Symeonides, Murray Brunt, Peter Schmid, Simon Waters, Christopher Twelves, Peter Barrett-Lee, John Bartlett, Tammy Piper, Karen McAdam, Eve Macdonald Chisholm, Michelle Welsh, Robert Hill. ARISTACAT - Aromatase inhibition plus minus saracatinib as advanced breast cancer therapy: A randomised phase II study of aromatase inhibition plus/minus the Src-inhibitor AZD0530 in post-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-09.

The association between breast cancer and benign thyroid disorders, in particular thyroid autoimmunity, has been debated for decades. Autoantibodies to thyroid peroxidase, the hallmark of thyroid autoimmunity, have a higher prevalence among patients with breast cancer compared with the general population. Furthermore a correlation between their positivity and a better prognosis of breast cancer was found in several independent small-scale studies, even if such observation was not confirmed in a subsequent retrospective study conducted on the largest patient cohort to date.\ud \ud The thyroid and mammary glands present several biological similarities, therefore the hypothesis of an immune response to shared thyroid/breast antigens could in part explain the association between thyroid autoimmunity and breast cancer. The sodium iodide symporter is expressed in both glands, however it seems unlikely to be the key common antigen, considering that autoantibodies targeting it are rare. Instead thyroid peroxidase, one of the major thyroid autoantigens, is also expressed in breast tissue and therefore represents the main antigenic link between thyroid autoimmunity and breast cancer. Furthermore lactoperoxidase, an enzyme of the same family that shares structural similarities with thyroid peroxidase, is expressed in neoplastic breast cells and is responsible for the cross-reactivity with some autoantibodies to thyroid peroxidase.\ud \ud Novel strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer might take advantage of the antigenic link between thyroid and breast tissues.

INTRODUCTION: Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3), the cell surface receptor for double stranded RNA (dsRNA), expressed in ∼40% of advanced primary breast cancers (T2/T3/N+) has been shown to be an effective therapeutic target for synthetic dsRNA poly A:U in combination with radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy, producing a significant decrease in risk of metastatic relapse (HR 1.85-2.0; 1.03-3.89; Cancer Res;71:1607). AIM: The present pre-clinical study aimed to explore the therapeutic potential of a ubiquitously expressed intracellular dsRNA receptor, retinoic-acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I) - a cytoplasmic pathogen recognition receptor directed at pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) motifs to differentiate viral from cellular dsRNAs. We have shown Ampligen, poly I:C12U (a synthetic dsRNA polymer designed to rapidly degrade in vivo to prevent the toxicity of long dsRNA polymers such as poly I:C) is capable of entering cells in its fragmented dsRNA oligomeric form ( METHODOLOGY & RESULTS: Preliminary experiments with Ampligen on several human breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 & MDA-MB 453) and normal human mammary epithelial & fibroblast cell lines (HMEC & HFC) unexpectedly showed it to consistently cause a significant loss of cell viability (CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay) in p53-deficient drug resistant (5-FU/doxorubicin) MDA-MB 453 cell line in contrast to cell growth arrest (Guava cell Cycle Assay) in p53 wild type MCF-7 cancer and the two non-neoplastic cells lines. This selective effect was confirmed using syngeneic clones of MCF-7 breast cancer cells stably transfected with a dominant negative p53 construct or vector alone: p53-function blocked (DD1) vs p53-function active (EV1) MCF-7 cell lines, respectively (J Nucl Med 2006; 47:1525–1530), and shown to be associated with RIG-I specific mRNA induction (RT-PCR) and Type I interferon pathway activation both inhibited by BX795 (selective inhibitor of IRF3 activation and IFN-b production). Decitabine (DNA demethylating drug capable of intra-cellular generation of dsRNA through transcriptional activation of Alu retrotransposons - PNAS 2012; December 10: E89–E98 ) was next tested as an alternative source of intra-cellular dsRNA, and found to produce results similar to Ampligen on DD1 and EV1. Work is in progress to examine dose response and time-course relationships of the effects Ampligen or decitabine added singly or in combination with chemotherapeutic drug (e.g. doxorubicin) on DD1 and triple negative breast cancer cell lines such as MDA-MB 453 to explore potential therapeutically most effective protocols. PROVISIONAL CONCLUSIONS: Intra-cellular dsRNA receptor RIG-I constitutively expressed in all cells offers a more ubiquitous target compared to TLR3 for the treatment of breast cancer. Ampligen and decitabine with their selective growth inhibitory effect on drug resistant p53-deficient breast cancer cell lines, merit testing as novel drugs for treatment of p53-deficient drug resistant breast cancer e.g. triple negative breast cancer frequently (∼70%) associated with drug resistance and altered p53 status. Citation Format: Jasani B, Navabi N, Barrett-Lee P, Thompson A, Chester J, Mason M. Intra-cellular dsRNA receptor RIG-I: A ubiquitous novel target for treatment of chemotherapy drug resistant breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-14-07.

Adjuvant bisphosphonates improve disease outcomes in postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) but the long-term effects are poorly described. The AZURE trial (ISRCTN79831382) was designed to determine whether adjuvant zoledronic acid (ZOL) improves disease outcomes in EBC. Previous analyses showed no effect on overall outcomes but identified benefits in postmenopausal women. Here we present the long-term risks and benefits of adjuvant ZOL with 10-years follow-up. Patients and methods: 3360 patients with stage II/III breast cancer were included in an academic, international, phase III, randomized, open label trial. Patients were followed up on a regular schedule until 10 years. Patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to standard adjuvant systemic therapy +/− intravenous ZOL 4 mg every 3–4 weeks x6, and then at reduced frequency to complete 5 years treatment. The primary outcome was disease free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included invasive DFS (IDFS), overall survival (OS), sites of recurrence, skeletal morbidity and treatment outcomes according to primary tumor amplification of the transcription factor, MAF. Pre-planned subgroup analyses focused on interactions between menopausal status and treatment effects. Results: With a median follow up of 117 months [IQR 70.4–120.4), DFS and IDFS were similar in both arms (HRDFS = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.84–1.06, p = 0.340; HRIDFS = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.82–1.02, p = 0.116). However, outcomes remain improved with ZOL in postmenopausal women (HRDFS = 0.82, 95%CI = 0.67–1.00; HRIDFS = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.64–0.94). In the 79% of tested women with a MAF FISH negative tumor, ZOL improved IDFS (HRIDFS = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.58–0.97) and OS HROS = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.50–0.94), irrespective of menopause. ZOL did not improve disease outcomes in MAF FISH + tumors. Bone metastases as a first DFS recurrence (BDFS) were reduced with ZOL (HRB-DFS = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.63–0.92, p = 0.005). ZOL reduced skeletal morbidity with fewer fractures and skeletal events after disease recurrence. 30 cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw in the ZOL arm (1.8%) have occurred. Conclusions: Disease benefits with adjuvant ZOL in postmenopausal early breast cancer persist at 10 years of follow-up. The biomarker MAF identified a patient subgroup that derived benefit from ZOL irrespective of menopausal status.

Introduction Incidental liver irradiation during breast radiotherapy can increase the risk of second primary malignancy and induce adverse inflammatory states. This study establishes the volume of liver irradiated during free-breathing breast radiotherapy. Novel associations between liver dose-volume data and systemic interleukin-6 soluble receptor and blood counts are evaluated. Methods The volume of liver within the 10%, 50% and 90% isodose was determined for 100 women with stage 0 to II breast carcinoma undergoing 40Gy in 15 fractions over three weeks tangential irradiation. Blood counts and interleukin 6 soluble receptor concentration were recorded before, during and four weeks after radiotherapy. Dose-volume data for right-sided treatments was associated with longitudinal measures at bivariate and multivariable levels. Results A maximum of 226cm3 (19%), 92 cm3 (8%) and 62 cm3 (5%) of the liver was irradiated within the 10%, 50% and 90% isodose. Liver irradiation was almost exclusively a feature of the 52 right-sided treatments and was strongly correlated with breast volume (ρ = 0.7, p < 0.0001). Liver V10% was significantly associated with interleukin-6 soluble receptor concentration four weeks post-radiotherapy (beta = 0.38, p = 0.01) after controlling for theoretical confounding variables. Conclusion Up to 8% of the liver is irradiated within the primary beam during local right-sided breast radiotherapy. Select use of a deep inspiration breath hold technique would reduce this volume, and minimise the risk of radiation-induced malignancy and acute systemic elevation of inflammatory interleukin 6 soluble receptor.

Purpose: One third of ER-positive breast cancer patients who initially respond to endocrine therapy become resistant to treatment. Such treatment failure is associated with poor prognosis and remains an area of unmet clinical need. Here, we identify a specific posttranslational modification that occurs during endocrine resistance and which results in tumor susceptibility to the apoptosis-inducer TRAIL. This potentially offers a novel stratified approach to targeting endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Experimental Design: Cell line and primary-derived xenograft models of endocrine resistance were investigated for susceptibility to TRAIL. Tumor viability, cancer stem cell (CSC) viability (tumorspheres), tumor growth kinetics, and metastatic burden were assessed. Western blots for the TRAIL-pathway inhibitor, c-FLIP, and upstream regulators were performed. Results were confirmed in primary culture of 26 endocrine-resistant and endocrine-naïve breast tumors. Results: Breast cancer cell lines with acquired resistance to tamoxifen (TAMR) or faslodex were more sensitive to TRAIL than their endocrine-sensitive controls. Moreover, TRAIL eliminated CSC-like activity in TAMR cells, resulting in prolonged remission of xenografts in vivo. In primary culture, TRAIL significantly depleted CSCs in 85% endocrine-resistant, compared with 8% endocrine-naïve, tumors, whereas systemic administration of TRAIL in endocrine-resistant patient-derived xenografts reduced tumor growth, CSC-like activity, and metastases. Acquired TRAIL sensitivity correlated with a reduction in intracellular levels of c-FLIP, and an increase in Jnk-mediated phosphorylation of E3-ligase, ITCH, which degrades c-FLIP. Conclusions: These results identify a novel mechanism of acquired vulnerability to an extrinsic cell death stimulus, in endocrine-resistant breast cancers, which has both therapeutic and prognostic potential. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2452–63. ©2018 AACR.

Germline mutations in BRCA1/2 predispose individuals to breast cancer (termed germline-mutated BRCA1/2 breast cancer, gBRCA-BC) by impairing homologous recombination (HR) and causing genomic instability. HR also repairs DNA lesions caused by platinum agents and PARP inhibitors. Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) harbor subpopulations with BRCA1/2 mutations, hypothesized to be especially platinum-sensitive. Cancers in putative 'BRCAness' subgroups - tumors with BRCA1 methylation; low levels of BRCA1 mRNA (BRCA1 mRNA-low); or mutational signatures for HR deficiency and those with basal phenotypes - may also be sensitive to platinum. We assessed the efficacy of carboplatin and another mechanistically distinct therapy, docetaxel, in a phase 3 trial in subjects with unselected advanced TNBC. A prespecified protocol enabled biomarker-treatment interaction analyses in gBRCA-BC and BRCAness subgroups. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). In the unselected population (376 subjects; 188 carboplatin, 188 docetaxel), carboplatin was not more active than docetaxel (ORR, 31.4% versus 34.0%, respectively; P = 0.66). In contrast, in subjects with gBRCA-BC, carboplatin had double the ORR of docetaxel (68% versus 33%, respectively; biomarker, treatment interaction P = 0.01). Such benefit was not observed for subjects with BRCA1 methylation, BRCA1 mRNA-low tumors or a high score in a Myriad HRD assay. Significant interaction between treatment and the basal-like subtype was driven by high docetaxel response in the nonbasal subgroup. We conclude that patients with advanced TNBC benefit from characterization of BRCA1/2 mutations, but not BRCA1 methylation or Myriad HRD analyses, to inform choices on platinum-based chemotherapy. Additionally, gene expression analysis of basal-like cancers may also influence treatment selection.

Background: The annual recurrence rates of post-menopausal ER-positive breast cancers persist beyond the first 5 years of diagnosis and treatment and the mortality rates in this period are higher versus ER-negative cancers. Extended endocrine therapy past 5 years has been shown to be of benefit but is associated with increased toxicity and cost thus the ability to predict patients who are at highest risk of late relapse would be of significant benefit in clinical decision making in this context. β-catenin is an intracellular protein that undergoes Wnt-mediated nuclear translocation where it transactivates genes implicated in tumour development and progression. We have also previously reported that β-catenin can play a role in aggressive resistance that accompanies prolonged endocrine treatment in vitro. In this study, we thus investigated whether β-catenin expression in ER+ breast cancer was predictive of recurrence beyond 5 years in an analysis of three separate endocrine-treated cohorts. Methods: Associations between β-catenin gene expression and relapse free survival (RFS) were performed using the online KMplotter tool. Immunostaining for total β-catenin was performed on tissue samples from 3 ER+ primary breast cancer series with long-term follow-up data: Nottingham 2000 (n=384, tamoxifen-only); ABC (n=570; tamoxifen only); transATAC (n=743; tamoxifen or ansatrozole). The association between subcellular (nuclear or cytoplasmic) β-catenin expression and RFS was determined in (i) the entire cohort, (ii) the first 5 years of tamoxifen treatment versus post-5 years. Results: KMplotter analysis of β-catenin in ER+, tamoxifen-treated patient samples (n=665) revealed a significant relationship with improved RFS in the post-five year cohort [HR: 0.48 (0.34-0.68); p=0.000019) versus the first 5 years [HR: 0.91 (0.61-1.36; p=0.64)]. No significant association was observed in untreated ER+ patients. In the Nottingham series, nuclear β-catenin positivity was significantly associated with improved survival in the 20-year follow-up for tamoxifen-treated patients (p=0.047) but not in the first five years (p=0.239). Cytoplasmic β-catenin did not associate with survival. Further analysis in the ABC series revealed an association between nuclear β-catenin positivity and improved survival for tamoxifen-treated patients in the entire cohort (HR: 0.52 (0.18, 0.55); p=0.00005). However, nuclear β-catenin was more strongly associated with improved outcome in the post 5-year treatment group (HR: 0.30 (0.14, 0.66); p=0.01) versus the first five years of treatment (HR: 0.33 (0.15,0.73); p=0.06). No significant associations were seen with cytoplasmic β-catenin. The transATAC trial material again revealed an association between presence of nuclear β-catenin and reduced distant recurrence in the post 5-years endocrine-treated cohort (HR: 0.54 (0.33, 0.91): x2=5.52, p=0.018) versus years 1-5 (HR: 1.16 (0.67, 2.01); x2=0.29, p=0.59). Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate that nuclear β-catenin may represent a predictive biomarker for late relapse following tamoxifen treatment in ER+ breast cancer where, contrary to traditional hypotheses and pre-clinical data, its nuclear expression is strongly associated with good outcome post-five years of treatment. Citation Format: Stephen Hiscox, Chris Smith, Robert I Nicholson, Julia Gee, Adrian Harris, Judith Bliss, Eleftheria Kalaizak, Ivana Sestak, Mitch Dowsett, Jack Cuzick, Ian Ellis, Peter Barrett-Lee. Nuclear β-catenin negativity predicts for late relapse in ER+, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-01.

Introduction: TACT2 (CRUK/05/019), a multicentre randomized phase III trial in patients with node +ve or high risk node -ve invasive EBC with E-CMF as control tested two hypotheses in a 2x2 factorial design, with previously presented results showing: i) no evidence of a benefit from accelerated 2-weekly epirubicin (aE) compared to standard 3-weekly epirubicin (E) (Cameron 2012); and ii) capecitabine (X) gives equivalent efficacy but preferential side-effect profile to CMF (Canney 2014). Studies suggest that Androgen receptor (AR) expression may be associated with improved outcome in early breast cancer. We performed an analysis of AR expression in TACT2 patients to test the hypothesis that AR would represent an independent predictor of residual risk following adjuvant therapy. Methods: Tumour samples were collected prospectively from 3803/4391 TACT2 patients, Tissue micro-arrays were constructed as per published guidelines and central AR, ER, PgR, HER2, Ki67, CK5/6, EGFr and BCL2 staining performed and quantified by imaged analysis for ER, PgR, HER2, Ki67 and BCL2. EGFr and CK5/6 were dichotomised by light microscopy evaluation of cores. After planned biomarker analyses had been performed, a subset of TACT2 cases for whom remaining tissue was available were analysed for AR expression. Data for 1878 cases was available for this analysis (49% of those consenting to tissue collection). AR expression was dichotomised as AR-ve (10%). Log-rank tests were used to explore the prognostic value of AR on time to recurrence (TTR). Cox-regression models were used to test the independent prognostic value of AR in the presence of tumour size, grade, nodal status, and biological subtypes. Marker by treatment interaction terms were included in models to test the predictive value of AR for both randomised treatment comparisons. Results: 1398/1878 (74%) patients were classed as AR+ve and 480/1878 (26%) as AR-ve. The proportion of AR+ve patients differed significantly between biological subtypes (Luminal A 269/293 (92%); Luminal B 784/928 (84%); HER+ve 86/111 (77%); Basal-like 37/216 (17%); 5-marker-ve 37/93 (40%); χ2 p 117/480 (24%) AR-ve patients had a TTR event compared with 183/1398 (13%) AR+ve patients (HR for AR-ve compared to AR+ve =2.05 95%CI 1.63-2.59; p No differential treatment effect between AR subtypes was observed for either randomised treatment comparison (E/aE or CMF/X). Conclusion: AR is an independent prognostic marker for residual risk following chemotherapy in this large study which included patients with both luminal and non-luminal cancers. AR expression patterns differ between molecular subtypes of early breast cancer, with evidence suggesting the impact of AR on residual risk may also differ between subtypes. AR is currently being explored as another potential target for therapy so these data could have future clinical relevance. Citation Format: Jane Bayani, James Morden, Sunil Skaria, Peter Bliss, Robert Grieve, Adrian Harnett, Chris Bradley, Diana Ritchie, Peter Barrett-Lee, Peter Canney, David Cameron, Judith Bliss, John Bartlett. Androgen receptor expression is an independent marker of lower residual risk in the TACT2 trial (CRUK/05/019) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-03.

Introduction: TACT2, a multicentre randomized phase III trial in patients with node +ve or high risk node-ve invasive EBC with E-CMF as control tested two hypotheses in a 2x2 factorial design, presented results showing: i) no evidence of benefit from accelerated 2-weekly epirubicin (aE) compared to standard 3-weekly epirubicin (E) (Cameron 2012); and ii) capecitabine (X) gives equivalent efficacy but preferential side-effect profile to CMF (Canney 2014). Here we present prognostic and potential predictive value of translational biomarkers. We address two main hypotheses: i) aE is less effective in patients with luminal A than patients with other subtypes (Coates 2012) and ii) BCL2 is an independent prognosis marker (Callagy 2006). We also explore the relationship between CK5/6, EGFR and BCL2 and residual risk following chemotherapy. Methods: Tumour samples were collected prospectively from 3803 patients (86.6% of the 4391 TACT2 patients and 94.5% of those consenting). Tissue microarrays were constructed as per published guidelines and central ER, PgR, HER2, Ki67, CK5/6, EGFR and BCL2 staining performed and quantified by imaged analysis for ER, PgR, HER2, Ki67 and BCL2. EGFR and CK5/6 were dichotomised by light microscopy evaluation of cores. 94.5-97.6% of cases were stained and successfully analysed for individual biomarkers by IHC. Patients were categorised into 4 BC subtypes by central ER/PgR/HER2/Ki67 (Luminal A, B, HER2+ve, Triple-ve (TN)) with TN further divided into basal-like (CK5/6 or EGFR +ve) and 5-marker-ve (both CK5/6 and EGFR -ve). Log-rank tests assessed prognostic effect of each marker individually and cancer subtypes on time to tumour recurrence (TTR). Cox-regression models tested independent prognostic value of BCL2 in the presence of tumour size, grade, nodal status, and biological subtype. Results: No evidence of a difference in the efficacy of aE compared with E between the 4 patient subtypes was observed (Luminal A: n=608, HR (for aE compared with E) 0.80 (95% CI 0.47-1.38); Luminal B: n=1804, HR=0.97 (95% CI 0.76-1.23); HER2+ve: n=219, HR=1.03 (95% CI 0.53-1.99); TN: n=638, HR=1.00 (95% CI 0.72-1.39); Test for heterogeneity p=0.84). When subdividing the TN group into basal-like and 5-marker-ve, HRs were 0.66 (95% CI 0.45-0.98) and HR 1.56 (95% CI 0.82-2.96) respectively, post-hoc analysis for heterogeneity between these 2 subtypes p=0.025. No differential effect between subtypes was observed for the comparison of CMF and X. 82/434 (18.9%) patients with low BCL2 expression (≤10%) had a TTR event compared with 444/3158 (14.1%) with high BCL2 (>10%), univariate HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.10-1.76, p=0.006. However this difference was no longer seen after adjustment for clinical factors and biological subtype (HR 1.17 95% CI 0.90-1.52, p=0.25). Conclusion: We found no statistical evidence that luminal A cancers are associated with reduced benefit from aE vs E. A hypothesis generating observation that benefit from aE vs E might be different between basal-like and 5-marker-ve cancers should be interpreted with caution due to the small numbers of cases and the retrospective nature of the analysis. In this study BCL2 did not provide independent prognostic information when corrected for conventional histopathological features. Citation Format: James Morden, Judith Bliss, Jane Bayani, Robert Laing, Rajiv Agrawal, Jeremy Thomas, Andrew Goodman, Vivienne Loo, Peter Clark, Peter Canney, Peter Barrett-Lee, John Bartlett, David Cameron. Intrinsic subtypes and BCL2 as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in the TACT2 trial (CRUK/05/019) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-04.

Background: Small-scale studies correlated the presence of thyroid autoimmunity with both improved or worsened breast cancer outcome. Objectives: We aimed to clarify this association in a large cohort using the phase III, randomized, controlled Taxotere as Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial (TACT, CRUK01/001). Methods: TACT women >18 years old with node-positive or high-risk node-negative early breast cancer (pT1–3a, pN0–1, M0), with stored plasma (n = 1,974), taken 15.5 (median; IQR 7.0–24.0) months after breast surgery were studied. Patients had also received chemotherapy (100%), radiotherapy (1,745/1,974; 88.4%), hormonal therapy (1,378/ 1,974; 69.8%), or trastuzumab (48/1,974; 2.4%). History of thyroid diseases and/or related treatments was not available. The prognostic significance of autoantibodies to thyroid peroxidase (TPOAb; positive ≥6 kIU/L), free-thyroxine and thyrotropin (combined: euthyroid, hypothyroid, hyperthyroid) was evaluated for disease-free survival (DFS), overall-survival (OS), and time-to-recurrence (TTR), with Cox regression models in univariate and multivariable analyses. The extended median follow-up was 97.5 months. Results: No difference in DFS was found by TPOAb status (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97, 95%CI: 0.78–1.19; p = 0.75) and/or thyroid function (unadjusted HR [hypothyroid vs. euthyroid]: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.79–1.68; p = 0.46; unadjusted HR [hyperthyroid vs. euthyroid]: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.82–1.61; p = 0.44). Similar results were obtained for OS, TTR, multivariable analyses, when TPOAb titre by tertiles was considered, and in a subgroup of 123 patients with plasma collected before adjuvant treatments. Conclusions: No evidence for a prognostic role of TPOAb and/or thyroid function in moderate-to-high-risk early breast cancer was found in the largest and longest observational study to date.

Patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) preferred subcutaneous (s.c.) trastuzumab, delivered via single-use injection device (SID), over the intravenous (i.v.) formulation (Cohort 1 of the PrefHer study: NCT01401166). Here, we report patient preference, healthcare professional satisfaction, and safety data pooled from Cohort 1 and also Cohort 2, where s.c. trastuzumab was delivered via hand-held syringe.Patients were randomized to receive four adjuvant cycles of 600 mg fixed-dose s.c. trastuzumab followed by four cycles of standard i.v. trastuzumab, or vice versa. The primary endpoint was overall preference proportions for s.c. or i.v., assessed by patient interviews in the evaluable ITT population.A total of 245 patients were randomized to receive s.c. followed by i.v. and 243 received i.v. followed by s.c. (evaluable ITT populations: 235 and 232 patients, respectively). s.c. was preferred by 415/467 [88.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 85.7-91.6; P0.0001; two-sided test against null hypothesis of 65% s.c. preference]; 45/467 preferred i.v. (9.6%; 95% CI 7-13); 7/467 indicated no preference (1.5%; 95% CI 1-3). Clinician-reported adverse events occurred in 292/479 (61.0%) and 245/478 (51.3%) patients during the pooled s.c. and i.v. periods, respectively (P0.05; 2 × 2 χ(2)); 16 patients (3.3%) in each period experienced grade 3 events; none were grade 4/5.PrefHer revealed compelling and consistent patient preferences for s.c. over i.v. trastuzumab, regardless of SID or hand-held syringe delivery. s.c. was well tolerated and safety was consistent with previous reports, including the HannaH study (NCT00950300). No new safety signals were identified compared with the known i.v. profile in EBC. PrefHer and HannaH confirm that s.c. trastuzumab is a validated and preferred option over i.v. for improving patients' care in HER2-positive breast cancer.NCT01401166.

Background The TACT trial (CRUK/01/001) compared adjuvant sequential FEC-docetaxel (FEC-D) chemotherapy with standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy of similar duration in women with early breast cancer. Results at a median of 5years suggested no improvement in disease-free survival with FEC-D. Given differing toxicity profiles of the regimens, the impact on quality of life (QL) was explored. Methods Patients from 44 centres completed standardised QL questionnaires before chemotherapy, after cycles 4 and 8, at 9, 12, 18 and 24months and at 6years follow-up. Patient diaries assessed frequency, associated distress and impact on daily activity of 15 treatment related side effects. Findings 830 patients (415 FEC-D; 415 controls) contributed assessments during 0–24months; 362 of whom participated again at 6years. During chemotherapy, FEC-D impaired global health/QL and depression rates and significantly more QL domains than standard regimens. Novel diary card ratings highlighted significantly more distress and interference with daily activities due to FEC-D side effects compared with standard treatment. In both groups, most QL parameters returned to baseline levels by 2years and were unchanged at 6years. Interpretation Within expected negative effects of chemotherapy on wide ranging QL domains FEC-D patients reported greater toxicity, disruption and distress during treatment with no improvement in disease outcome at 5years than patients receiving standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Findings should inform future patients of relative costs and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Summary Background The role of adjuvant bisphosphonates in early breast cancer is uncertain. We therefore did a large randomised trial to investigate the effect of the adjuvant use of zoledronic acid on disease-free survival (DFS) in high-risk patients with early breast cancer. Methods In the AZURE trial, an open-label, international, multicentre, randomised, controlled, parallel-group phase 3 trial, women (age ≥18 years) with stage II or III breast cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) by a central automated 24-h computer-generated telephone minimisation system (balanced for number of involved axillary lymph nodes, tumour stage, oestrogen receptor status, type and timing of systemic therapy, menopausal status, statin use, and treatment centre) to receive standard adjuvant systemic treatment alone (control group) or with 4 mg intravenous zoledronic acid every 3–4 weeks for six doses, then every 3 months for eight doses, followed by every 6 months for five doses, for a total of 5 years of treatment. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints were invasive DFS (IDFS), overall survival, time to bone metastases, time to distant recurrence, and subgroup analyses of variables included in the randomisation. All patients have completed study treatment. Results from the intention-to-treat final analysis of this fully recruited study are presented after a median follow-up of 84 months (IQR 66–93). This final efficacy analysis was planned to take place after 940 DFS events. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00072020. Findings 3360 women were recruited from 174 centres in seven countries between Sept 4, 2003, and Feb 16, 2006. The number of DFS events did not differ between groups: 493 in the control group and 473 in the zoledronic acid group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·94, 95% CI 0·82–1·06; p=0·30). IDFS (HR 0·93, 95% CI 0·82–1·05; p=0·22), overall survival (0·93, 0·81–1·08; p=0·37), and distant recurrences (0·93, 0·81–1·07; p=0·29) were much the same in both groups. Zoledronic acid reduced the development of bone metastases, both as a first event (HR 0·78, 95% CI 0·63–0·96; p=0·020) and at any time during follow-up (0·81, 0·68–0·97; p=0·022). The effects of zoledronic acid on DFS were not affected by oestrogen-receptor status. However, zoledronic acid improved IDFS in those who were over 5 years since menopause at trial entry (n=1041; HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·63–0·96) but not in all other (premenopause, perimenopause, and unknown status) menopausal groups (n=2318; HR 1·03, 95% CI 0·89–1·20). 33 cases of suspected osteonecrosis of the jaw have been reported, with 26 confirmed on central review, all in the zoledronic acid group (1·7%, 95% CI 1·0–2·4). Interpretation These results suggest no overall benefit from the addition of zoledronic acid to standard adjuvant treatments for early breast cancer. However, zoledronic acid does reduce the development of bone metastases and, for women with established menopause, improved disease outcomes. Funding Novartis Global and NIHR Cancer Research Network.

Background: Adjuvant trastuzumab with chemotherapy is standard treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, defined as either HER2 IHC3+ or IHC2+ and FISH amplified. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree to which HER2 amplification in terms of HER2 gene copy numbers in HER2+IHC2+ cancers affected the outcome in a community setting. Methods: Case records of 311 consecutive patients with early breast cancer presenting between 1st January 2005 and 31st December 2008 were reviewed. Progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method using STATA 13. Results: Among 3+ cases (n=230) 163 received T vs 67 no-T. Among 2+ cases (n=81) 59 received T vs 22 no-T. Among 59 IHC2+-treated cases n=28 had an average of >12, n=13 had >6 to 2 to 12) appears to be associated with consistently better response compared with patients with intermediate HER2 copy numbers (6–12). In light of emerging data of patients showing insensivity to trastuzumab therapy, we propose that the HER2 gene copy number value should be included as an additional indicator for stratifying both the management and the follow-up of breast cancer patients.

The TACT trial is the largest study assessing the benefit of taxanes as part of adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer. The goal of this translational study was to clarify the predictive and prognostic value of Tau within the TACT trial. Tissue microarrays (TMA) were available from 3,610 patients. ER, PR, HER2 from the TACT trial and Tau protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry on duplicate TMAs. Two parallel scoring systems were generated for Tau expression ('dichotomised' vs. 'combined' score). The positivity rate of Tau expression was 50 % in the trial population (n = 2,483). Tau expression correlated positively with ER (p < 0.001) and PR status (p < 0.001); but negatively with histological grade (p < 0.001) and HER2 status (p < 0.001). Analyses with either scoring systems for Tau expression demonstrated no significant interaction between Tau expression and efficacy of docetaxel. Contrary to the hypothesis that taxane benefit would be enriched in Tau negative/low patients, the only groups with a suggestion of a reduced event rate in the taxane group were the HER2-positive, Tau positive subgroups. Tau expression was seen to be a prognostic factor on univariate analysis associated with an improved DFS, independent of the treatment group (p < 0.001). It had no prognostic value in ER-negative tumours and the weak prognostic effect of Tau in ER-positive tumours (p = 0.02) diminished, when considering ER as an ordinal variable. On multivariable analyses, Tau had no prognostic value in either group. In addition, no significant interaction between Tau expression and benefit from docetaxel in patients within the PR-positive and negative subsets was seen. This is now the second large adjuvant study, and the first with quantitative analysis of ER and Tau expression, failing to show an association between Tau and taxane benefit with limited utility as a prognostic marker for Tau in ER-positive early breast cancer patients.

Bisphosphonates are routinely used in the treatment of metastatic bone disease from breast cancer to reduce pain and bone destruction. Zoledronic acid given by intravenous infusion has been widely used, but places a substantial logistical burden on both patient and hospital. As a result, the use of oral ibandronic acid has increased, despite the absence of comparative data. In the ZICE trial, we compared oral ibandronic acid with intravenous zoledronic acid for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer to bone.This phase 3, open-label, parallel group active-controlled, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority phase 3 study was done in 99 UK hospitals. Eligibility criteria included at least one radiologically confirmed bone metastasis from a histologically confirmed breast cancer. Patients with ECOG performance status 0 to 2 and clinical decision to treat with bisphosphonates within 3 months of randomisation were randomly assigned to receive 96 weeks of treatment with either intravenous zoledronic acid at 4 mg every 3-4 weeks or oral ibandronic acid 50 mg daily. Randomisation (1:1) was done via a central computerised system within stratified block sizes of four. Randomisation was stratified on whether patients had current or planned treatment with chemotherapy; current or planned treatment with hormone therapy; and whether they had a previous skeletal-related event within the last 3 months or had planned radiotherapy treatment to the bone or planned orthopaedic surgery due to bone metastases. The primary non-inferiority endpoint was the frequency and timing of skeletal-related events over 96 weeks, analysed using a per-protocol analysis. All active (non-withdrawn) patients have now reached the 96-week timepoint and the trial is now in long-term follow-up. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00326820.Between Jan 13, 2006, and Oct 4, 2010, 705 patients were randomly assigned to receive ibandronic acid and 699 to receive zoledronic acid; three patients withdrew immediately after randomisation. The per-protocol analysis included 654 patients in the ibandronic acid group and 672 in the zoledronic acid group. Annual rates of skeletal-related events were 0·499 (95% CI 0·454-0·549) with ibandronic acid and 0·435 (0·393-0·480) with zoledronic acid; the rate ratio for skeletal-related events was 1·148 (95% CI 0·967-1·362). The upper CI was greater than the margin of non-inferiority of 1·08; therefore, we could not reject the null hypothesis that ibandronic acid was inferior to zoledronic acid. More patients in the zoledronic acid group had renal toxic effects than in the ibandronic acid group (226 [32%] of 697 vs 172 [24%] of 704) but rates of osteonecrosis of the jaw were low in both groups (nine [1%] of 697 vs five [1%] of 704). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were fatigue (97 [14%] of 697 patients allocated zoledronic acid vs 98 [14%] of 704 allocated ibandronic acid), increased bone pain (91 [corrected] [13%] vs 85 [corrected] [12%]), joint pain (41 [corrected] [6%] vs 38 [5%]), infection (31 [5%] vs 23 [corrected] [3%]), and nausea or vomiting (38 [5%] vs 41 [6%]).Our results suggest that zoledronic acid is preferable to ibandronic acid in preventing skeletal-related events caused by bone metastases. However, both drugs have acceptable side-effect profiles and the oral formulation is more convenient, and could still be considered if the patient has a strong preference or if difficulties occur with intravenous infusions.Roche Products Ltd (educational grant), supported by National Institute for Health Research Cancer Network, following endorsement by Cancer Research UK (CRUKE/04/022).

Increasing evidence points to interplay between a tumour and components of its microenvironment as a significant determinant of therapeutic sensitivity and response. Thus, a better understanding of this phenomenon is crucial for the development of more effective treatment strategies. Around half of HER2+ breast cancers express the ER. Despite the effectiveness of endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies for such tumours in pre-clinical, two-dimensional models, response can be variable clinically. Here we have investigated the impact of 3D culture within an extracellular matrix on the signaling pathway activity and therapeutic response to trastuzumab and endocrine (tamoxifen and fulvestrant) treatment of ER+/Her2+ breast cancer cell models. ER+/Her2+ BT474 and MDAMB361 cells were grown as 2D monolayers or as 3D cultures in Matrigel and their proliferative response to trastuzumab (0-100nM) and endocrine (tamoxifen or fulvestrant, 0-100nM) mono- and combination therapy assessed using coulter counting and immunocytochemical staining of the proliferation antigen, Ki67. A comparison of signaling pathway activation in 2D versus 3D culture, and in response to treatment in these contexts, was investigated using Western blotting. Whilst culture of both cell lines in 3D matrices did not significantly affect their endogenous growth rate, 3D culture resulted in a significant loss of PI3K/AKT pathway activity in both cell lines and augmented (BT474) MAPK signaling. The growth inhibitory effects of both trastuzumab and endocrine treatment, either as single agents or in combination, were significantly attenuated in 3D cultures when compared with 2D cultures (% growth inhibition ± sem: 65%±3.8 (3D) vs. 82%±1.3 (2D), p These data demonstrate that ER+/Her2+ breast cancer cells significantly alter their signaling pathway activity when cultured in a 3D, matrix-enriched environment, which may in turn act to limit response to a range of endocrine and targeted therapies. Targeting of such adaptive pathways that maintain growth in 3D culture may represent an effective strategy to improve therapeutic response clinically. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-06-12.

Aim: Firstly, to quantify active healthcare professional (HCP) time and costs associated with subcutaneous (SC) administration of trastuzumab (Herceptin?) compared with the standard intravenous infusion (IV) in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer within the adjuvant PrefHer trial setting; secondly, to measure patient time in the care unit and patient infusion chair time for both routes of administration. Methods: A UK multi-centre prospective, observational Time and Motion study was conducted alongside the PrefHer trial (ClinicalTrials.gov id: NCT01401166). Trained observers measured the duration of each SC and IV related task that HCPs undertook and recorded patient time in the chemotherapy unit and infusion chair. The type and quantity of medical consumables used with each route of administration were also collected. Twenty-four patient episodes were recorded (12 SC, 12 IV). Mean total administration time was calculated as the mean sum of task times, both for IV and SC formulations. The mean cost of each route of administration was calculated as the mean cost of HCP time plus the mean cost of consumables used. HCP time was costed using Personal Social Services Research Unit. Consumables were costed using hospital pharmacy data and online sources. Results: Mean active HCP time for IV administration was 92.6 minutes compared with 24.6 minutes for SC administration. The mean cost for IV preparation and administration was ￡144.96 (￡132.05 of HCP time and ￡12.92 of consumables) versus ￡33.15 (￡31.99 of HCP time and ￡1.17 of consumables) for SC administration. Mean time spent in the care unit and in the infusion chair was 94.5 minutes and 75 minutes respectively for IV, and 30.3 minutes and 19.8 minutes for SC. SC administration of trastuzumab could translate to a time saving of 68 minutes (versus IV) with a total cost saving of ￡111.81 per patient episode. This equates to a potential saving of ￡2012.58 over a full course of adjuvant treatment (18 cycles). Conclusion: Substituting IV infusion with SC administration of trastuzumab may lead to a substantial reduction in active HCP time, patient chair and unit time, consumable use and overall costs. The reduced patient chair and unit time could provide increased capacity within existing resources.

While endocrine therapy is the mainstay of ER+ breast cancer, the clinical effectiveness of these agents is limited by the phenomenon of acquired resistance that is associated with disease relapse and poor prognosis. Our previous studies revealed that acquired resistance is accompanied by a gain in cellular invasion and migration and also that CD44 family proteins are overexpressed in the resistant phenotype. Given the association of CD44 with tumor progression, we hypothesized that its overexpression may act to promote the aggressive behavior of endocrine-resistant breast cancers. Here, we have investigated further the role of two specific CD44 isoforms, CD44v3 and CD44v6, in the endocrine-resistant phenotype. Our data revealed that overexpression of CD44v6, but not CD44v3, in endocrine-sensitive MCF-7 cells resulted in a gain in EGFR signaling, enhanced their endogenous invasive capacity, and attenuated their response to endocrine treatment. Suppression of CD44v6 in endocrine-resistant cell models was associated with a reduction in their invasive capacity. Our data suggest that upregulation of CD44v6 in acquired resistant breast cancer may contribute to a gain in the aggressive phenotype of these cells and loss of endocrine response through transactivation of the EGFR pathway. Future therapeutic targeting of CD44v6 may prove to be an effective strategy alongside EGFR-targeted agents in delaying/preventing acquired resistance in breast cancer.

Background The Her2 receptor is overexpressed in up to 25 % of breast cancers and is associated with a poor prognosis. Around half of Her2+ breast cancers also express the estrogen receptor and treatment for such tumours can involve both endocrine and Her2-targeted therapies. However, despite preclinical data supporting the effectiveness of these agents, responses can vary widely in the clinical setting. In light of the increasing evidence pointing to the interplay between the tumour and its extracellular microenvironment as a significant determinant of therapeutic sensitivity and response here we investigated the impact of 3D matrix culture of breast cancer cells on their therapeutic sensitivity. Methods A 3D Matrigel-based culture system was established and optimized for the growth of ER+/Her2+ breast cancer cell models. Growth of cells in response to trastuzumab and endocrine agents in 3D culture versus routine monolayer culture were assessed using cell counting and Ki67 staining. Endogenous and trastuzumab-modulated signalling pathway activity in 2D and 3D cultures were assessed using Western blotting. Results Breast cancer cells in 3D culture displayed an attenuated response to both endocrine agents and trastuzumab compared with cells cultured in traditional 2D monolayers. Underlying this phenomenon was an apparent matrix-induced shift from AKT to MAPK signalling; consequently, suppression of MAPK in 3D cultures restores therapeutic response. Conclusion These data suggest that breast cancer cells in 3D culture display a reduced sensitivity to therapeutic agents which may be mediated by internal MAPK-mediated signalling. Targeting of adaptive pathways that maintain growth in 3D culture may represent an effective strategy to improve therapeutic response clinically. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2377-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction: TACT, an investigator-led study in 4162 women with node positive (N+ve) or high risk node negative (N-ve) early breast cancer (EBC), is the largest taxane trial unconfounded by treatment (trt) duration. At principal analysis, with 5 years follow-up (fup), no evidence of improved disease-free survival (DFS) was observed by switching to 4 cycles of docetaxel (D) after 4 cycles of FEC (Ellis, Lancet 2009). Results were provocative in suggesting differential effects according to ER & HER2 status. Longer fup provides opportunity to detect emergence of late trt effects overall & within phenotypic subgroups & explore patterns of recurrence, by tumor characteristics. Patients & methods: TACT recruited women with histologically confirmed completely resected invasive EBC from 104 centers (UK (103), Belgium (1)) between 02/2001 & 07/2003. Centers chose FEC (600/60/600 mg/m2 q3wk × 8) or E-CMF (E 100mg/m2 q3wk × 4 → CMF 100mg/m2 PO d1-14 or 600mg/m2 IV d1&8/40/600 mg/m2 q4wk × 4) as their control, reflecting standard UK practice. Patients (pts) were randomized to FEC-D (FEC q3wk × 4 → D 100 mg/m2 q3wk × 4) or control. 2523 pts were from FEC centers (FEC = 1265: FEC-D = 1258) & 1639 from E-CMF centers (E-CMF = 824; FEC-D = 815). Endocrine therapy was given for 5 years. Few pts received HER2 directed therapy; 589 pts had unknown HER2 status. Median fup is now 97.5 months; this analysis updates DFS & overall survival in the ITT population. It also explores patterns of relapse by phenotypic & clinical characteristics. Analyses of trt effect are stratified by ER status due to issues of non-proportionality of hazard associated with length of fup. Results: DFS events have been reported for 1329 pts (FEC-D=640, Control=689) giving an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) & 95%CI (stratified by control regimen & ER status) of 0.93 (0.83, 1.03) overall; p = 0.16 in favor of FEC-D & for ER+ve/HER2-ve of 0.99 (0.84, 1.17), for ER+ve/HER2+ve) 0.97 (0.73, 1.30), for ER-ve/HER2+ve 0.74 (0.53, 1.03), & ER-ve/HER2-ve 0.93 (0.73, 1.17). 1017 patients have died (FEC-D=500, Control=517); unadjusted HR=0.98 (95%CI: 0.86, 1.10); p = 0.69 with intercurrent deaths (prior to distant relapse) reported for 80 pts (FEC-D=40, Control=40). Annual event rates show different pattern of disease relapse by phenotypic subgroup Graphical representation will further explore these patterns & associated sites of relapse. Discussion: With a median fup of >8 years no clear benefit has emerged for D over standard anthracyclines within the TACT pt group. Differential effects associated with different patterns of relapse remain of interest. TACT precedes use of antiHER2 therapy which is known to have impacted on early relapse risk in HER2+ve pts. The high relapse risk observed for pts with ER-ve/HER2-ve disease remains a current clinical challenge. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-03.

Background: Despite the benefits provided by tamoxifen, not all ER+ patients respond to endocrine therapy and a substantial number of patients who initially respond ultimately relapse whilst on therapy, with endocrine resistance associating with poorer survival. The ability to identify biomarkers predictive of outcome on endocrine treatment would enable more effective stratification of patients most likely to benefit from such measures. Previously, we reported that tamoxifen is able to promote the development of a highly aggressive phenotype in ER+, HER2− endocrine-sensitive breast cancer cells in vitro that have been depleted of the intercellular adhesion molecule, E-cadherin. Here we have investigated the clinical relevance of these observations by examining the association between E-cadherin protein expression and clinical outcome in a series of primary early stage (Stage I-IIIA) invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast. Material and Methods: A series of 794 ER+ breast cancer tissues of known E-cadherin immunohistochemical status (Rakha EA et al (2005) Histopathol 46(6)) were available for this study and comprised both patients who had received tamoxifen for 5 years (n=345) or who had had no endocrine treatment (n=449). E-cadherin was further assessed in a group of ER-negative, tamoxifen-treated primary breast cancers (n=93) as an internal control. The median E-cadherin H-score staining was 120 (range 0 to 300). Results: Kaplain-Meier survival analysis revealed a significant association between reduced E-cadherin expression (< median) and overall survival (OS) in the tamoxifen-treated group at 20 years (p=0.04; Hazard Ratio [HR]=1.51, 95% CI:1.01−2.26) however this relationship was much stronger at 5 years (p=0.02; HR=2.00, 95% CI:1.10−3.65). In the ER+, tamoxifen-untreated tumours, a relationship was observed at 60 months only. Reduced E-cadherin also correlated with metastasis (regional and distant, p=0.01; HR=1.90, 95%CI:1-12-3.24) but only within the tamoxifen-treated group and only within the first 5-years, reflecting the time during which patients would have received tamoxifen. In the ER-, tamoxifen-treated cohort, no adverse impact of reduced E cadherin on these parameters was observed. Subgroup analysis of tamoxifen-treated patients revealed that the association between E-cadherin loss and adverse outcome was apparent in both HER2+ (n=39) and HER2− (n=302) cohorts. However, the association was more significant within the HER2+ group (p=0.02 for OS; HR=3.45, 95% CI:1.08−11.07) (p=0.03 for regional and distant metastasis; HR=2.78, 95%CI:1.02−7.57). These data support our in vitro observations that suppression of E-cadherin within in ER+, HER2+ breast cancer cell lines results in a significant gain in migration and invasion in response to tamoxifen. Discussion: These results are supportive of our hypothesis that low or absent E-cadherin expression in ER+, ductal breast cancer treated with tamoxifen predicts poor survival, particularly within the ER+, HER2+ phenotype. Of note, the presence of tamoxifen appears to be required for this event, suggesting that there is a patient cohort where other systemic endocrine therapy should be considered. E-cadherin represents a biomarker able to discriminate such cases. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-06-18.

Background: Trastuzumab was approved in the United Kingdom for adjuvant treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ breast cancer in 2006 at significant economic cost and with limited evidence in smaller T1N0 tumours. The South East Wales Cancer Network covers a population of 1 420 000 and maintains a database of treatments used. We examined this database to ensure the outcome of Trastuzumab use is as expected, especially in patients with T1N0 cancers. Ethods: M Case notes of patients with HER2+ disease eligible for adjuvant Trastuzumab over 2005–2008 were reviewed. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method using SPSS (version 16.0.01 for Windows, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Results: A total of 239 of 338 (70.7%) eligible HER2+ patients received treatment. At 3 years, the DFS of the treated group was 90.3% vs 73.3% and the OS was 98.5% vs 87.6%. In all, 47 of 92 stage I patients received Trastuzumab. Despite a trend towards worse prognostic factors in the treated group the DFS was 100% vs 84.1% and the OS was 100% vs 93.3%. Conclusion: Our results are comparable to those from landmark Trastuzumab trials. As evidence continues to emerge that smaller HER2+ cancers may behave aggressively our analysis of stage I tumours adds further support to the use of Trastuzumab in these patients.

Background: CD71 is involved in the cellular uptake of iron and is expressed on cells with high proliferation. Interestingly, we have Interestingly, we shown that its expression is associated with elevated tumour proliferation, shortened breast cancer specific survival and worsened outlook in ER+ adjuvant tamoxifen treated early breast cancer patients (Habashy et al, 2010). Here we extend our studies of the relationship between CD71 and tamoxifen outcome by study of an exploratory series of patients where endocrine response was directly assessable. Material and Methods: CD71 (clone 10F11 antibody; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and proliferation (MIB1) immunohistochemistry were performed as described in Habashy et al (2010) on 87 formalin fixed paraffin-embedded breast cancers. These were obtained from patients within the Nottingham Tenovus Multiple Antibody Study who had received systemic tamoxifen therapy for locally advanced primary carcinoma or metastatic disease or for recurrence after surgery alone. All had lesions assessable for response quality at 6 months, with survival and duration of antihormone response measured from initiation of antihormone to death or progression on therapy respectively. 48 tumours were classified as ER+ and 39 ER-. Results: Within this tamoxifen treated series, 68/87 patients were deemed positive for CD71 (plasma membrane and cytoplasmic), showing HScore values >=5. In the ER+ subgroup, a greater clinical response rate to tamoxifen was seen in CD71 — tumours (10 CR/PR, 3 S and 2 P) versus their CD71+ counterparts (CR/PR, 11 S and 16 P, p=0.015). CD71 positivity was associated with a significantly shortened time to progression and death (Kaplan Meier Test, p=0.026 and p=0.005 respectively). Examination of the proliferation marker MIB1 in ER+ tumours revealed a positive association with CD71 expression (Spearman's Test, p=0.01). In ER-patients, comprising predominantly progressive disease on tamoxifen therapy, CD71 status showed no impact on either time to progression of the disease or death. Discussion: The present study extends our novel findings relating CD71 expression to loss of response to tamoxifen in ER+ breast cancer and reveals CD71 associates with increased tumour cell proliferation in clinical disease. Whether CD71 plays a causative role in the direction of these events and can be targeted to improve endocrine response requires to be ascertained. Habashy HO et al, 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 119:283-293 Abd El-Rehim DM et al, 2005, Int J Cancer 116: 340-350 Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-06-19.

Introduction: TACT2, a multicentre phase III trial with E-CMF as control (NEAT Poole NEJM 2006), tests 2 hypotheses in a 2x2 factorial design: A) accelerating chemotherapy (CT) offers superior benefits (CALGB9741 Citron JCO 2003); B) the oral 5FU prodrug X gives similar efficacy but preferential side-effect profile to CMF. Here, focus is on hypothesis B with results for compliance, QL & acute toxicities (physician & patient (pt) reported) during CMF vs. X Materials & Methods: 4391 pts (4371 women, 20 men) with node+ve/high risk node-ve invasive EBC were recruited between Dec 2005-08. Treatment was E(100mg/m2 x 4) q3wk vs q2wk aE(100mg/m2 x 4 + pegfilgrastim 6mg d2) followed by classical CMF q4wk x 4 vs X(2500mg/m2/day x 14) q3wk x 4. Detailed CTCAE toxicity was assessed in a subset (38 centres, 2086 pts receiving ≥1 cycle CMF or X). 1279/2086 also participated in substudy of pt-reported outcomes (EORTC QLQ-C30 and TACT2-specific toxicities). 826 had complete dataset (baseline, cycles 4&8). P-values are trend tests across all grades & %grade 3+ are reported. QL assessed via linear regression models adjusted for baseline, end cycle 4 score, & aE vs E. P QL in cycles 5-8 was better with X than CMF for global QL& fatigue (P10 points): global QL CMF 106/398 (27%), X 79/428 (18%); fatigue CMF 164/398 (41%), X 122/428 (29%)). Conclusion: TACT2, the largest adjuvant EBC trial with X, confirms that X has preferential side-effect profile and global QL compared to CMF, with no evidence that prior aE compromised treatment delivery. Dose delivery data are consistent with advanced disease observations that for some pts, 2000mg/m2/day may be correct dose. Results: 4264 (97%) pts continued on CT beyond cycle 4. 3726 completed all 8 cycles (E-CMF 951 (85%), aE-CMF 938 (86%), E-X 932 (84%), aE-X 905 (83%). For cycles 5-8, %RDI > 85% was 69% after E and 68% after aE. Cycles delivered on time CMF 59%, X 63%; cycles without dose reduction CMF 75%, X 62%. 15 deaths in total within 30 days of CT: 9 on CMF, 6 on X. Worst grade toxicities which differed between CMF & X during cycles 5-8: Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-10-07.

Introduction: TACT2, a multicentre phase III trial with E-CMF as control (NEAT Poole NEJM 2006), tests 2 hypotheses in a 2x2 factorial design: A) accelerating chemotherapy (CT) offers superior benefits (CALGB9741 Citron JCO 2003); B) the oral 5FU prodrug capecitabine (X) gives similar efficacy but preferential side-effect profile to CMF. Here, focus is on hypothesis A with results for compliance, QL and acute toxicities (physician & patient (pt) reported) during E vs aE. Materials & Methods: Dec 2005-08 4391 pts (4371 women, 20 men) with node +ve or high risk node -ve invasive EBC were recruited. Pts were randomised to receive either E (100mg/m2 x 4) q3wk or q2wk aE (100mg/m2 x 4 plus pegfilgrastim, 6mg d2) followed by classical CMF q4wk x 4 or X (2500mg/m2/day x 14) q3wk x 4. Detailed CTCAE toxicity was to be assessed in subset (38 centres, 2137 pts). Of these, 2127 pts received ≥1 cycle CT. 1279 of these pts completed pt-reported outcomes (EORTC QLQ-C30 and pre-defined pt-reported TACT2 toxicities) with 910 completing baseline on time and having end cycle 4 data. P Results: 33/4391 pts did not start CT. 4259 (97%) completed the initial 4 cycles (E 2143 (96%), aE 2116 (98%) with RDI >85% for E 2058 (93%) and aE 1983 (91%). During cycles 1-4 higher rates of hand-foot syndrome & anaemia were seen with aE vs E (P Conclusion: In TACT2, the largest adjuvant trial reporting acute toxicities for standard vs accelerated E in EBC, serious CTCAE toxicity was less common with aE compared with E, however pts report poorer global QL, fatigue & role function which does not appear to be explained by impact on daily activities due to individual side-effects. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-10-06.

Background: Gene signatures including OncotypeDX are under intense study for their prognostic value, but there is also interest in their predictive value for outcome on endocrine therapy and whether markers reflected by such signatures retain predictive value when measured immunohistochemically (IHC). OncotypeDX comprises 16 cancer (& 5 reference) genes, including oestrogen receptor (ER)-related genes, HER2 pathway and proliferation/cell cycle-associated genes. A further gene in OncotypeDX, bcl-2-associated athanogene 1 (BAG-1), is understudied in breast cancer but increased IHC for BAG-1 has recently been related to improved tamoxifen outcome (Millar et al. Br J Cancer 100, 123-33, 2009). Here we examine if IHC for progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 and the proliferation-associated protein Ki67 can discriminate adjuvant tamoxifen outcome in an ER+ primary breast cancer series. We also evaluate BAG-1 in this series, and in ER+ breast cancer cell lines during antihormone treatment and following acquisition of resistance, to further consolidate relation of BAG-1 IHC to antihormone outcome. Material and Methods: IHC for PR, HER2, Ki67 (DAKO clone MIB1) and BAG-1 (Chemicon MAB4611) was performed in FFPE tissue microarrays from tamoxifen-treated ER+ primary breast cancer patients with 10 year follow-up (n=383). Clinicopathological data, including disease-free interval (DFI) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), were available for statistical analysis. BAG-1 IHC was also performed on paraffin-embedded cell pellets prepared from ER+ breast cancer lines (MCF-7, T47D) after 10 days culture with 10-7M 4OH-tamoxifen (4OHT) and following acquisition of resistance. Results: Kaplan Meier analysis demonstrated that increased NPI, PR negativity, HER2 overexpression and Ki67 positivity (>=10%) could discriminate ER+ tamoxifen-treated patients with reduced DFI (P70%) had significantly poorer outcome (DFI & BCSS: P Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-37.

Introduction: Despite the benefits of endocrine therapy for the management of ER positive breast cancer, not all patients respond equally leading to resistance and associated disease relapse and progression. We previously reported that endocrine agents themselves may induce an invasive phenotype in ER positive breast cancers with low/aberrant expression of E-cadherin. Here we investigate this phenomenon further, and provide data supporting a role for the ER co-receptor PELP-1, in mediating an adverse response to endocrine agents. Methods: The effects of tamoxifen (‘tam'), fulvestrant (‘fas') and estrogen withdrawal (as a model for aromatase inhibitor therapy) on the invasive and migratory capacity of endocrine-sensitive MCF-7 and T47D cells, in the presence or absence of functional E-cadherin and/or PELP-1 (using siRNA knockdown), was assessed via matrigel invasion and Boyden chamber migration assays. The effects of endocrine therapies alongside E-cadherin/PELP-1 modulation on cell proliferation were also assessed by growth assays, and western blotting using phospho-specific antibodies was performed to investigate signalling pathway changes associated with endocrine-induced changes in invasion and migration. Results: Both tamoxifen and fulvestrant induced a pro-invasive and pro-migratory phenotype in ER positive breast cancer cells displaying a high basal expression of PELP-1 which was augmented in the context of poor cell-cell contact (mean fold increase in invasion with endocrine treatment was 3.1±1.2; p=0.002 [MCF7+tam] and 2.7±1.4; p=0.002 [MCF7+fas]. Mean fold increase in invasion with endocrine treatment + E-cadherin siRNA was 22.4±5., p Conclusion: Our data demonstrates that anti-estrogens exert pro-invasive effects on ER-positive breast cancer cell models, particularly in the absence of homotypic cell-cell contact through a mechanism involving PELP1 and Src. These results suggest that E-cadherin and PELP-1 may be potential biomarkers when deciding upon optimum adjuvant endocrine therapy, whereby tumors with high PELP-1 / low E-cadherin expression may benefit from estrogen withdrawal therapy via aromatase inhibition, instead of direct ER modulation/antagonism. Citation Format: Michael Rees, Chris Smith, Peter Barrett-Lee, Stephen Hiscox. PELP-1 promotes adverse endocrine therapy response in ER+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2884.

This qualitative study investigated attitudes, perceptions, and practices of breast cancer specialists with reference to the effect of patient age on management decisions in breast cancer, and attempted to identify national consensus on this issue., This qualitative study investigated the attitudes, perceptions, and practices of breast cancer specialists with reference to the effect of patient age on management decisions in breast cancer, and attempted to identify national consensus on this issue. One hundred thirty-three relevant specialists, including 75 surgeons and 43 oncologists, participated in a virtual consultation using e-mailed questionnaires and open-ended discussion documents, culminating in the development of proposed consensus statements sent to participants for validation. A strong consensus was seen in favor of incorporating minimum standards of diagnostic services, treatment, and care for older patients with breast cancer into relevant national guidance, endorsed by professional bodies. Similarly, an overwhelming majority of participants agreed that simple, evidence-based protocols or guidelines on standardizing assessment of biological and chronological age should be produced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and the Scottish Medicines Consortium, developed in collaboration with specialist oncogeriatricians, and endorsed by professional bodies. A further recommendation that all breast cancer patient treatment and diagnostic procedures be undertaken in light of up-to-date, relevant scientific data met with majority support. This study was successful in gauging national specialist opinion regarding the effect of patient age on management decisions in breast cancer in the U.K.

Since its first regulatory approval more than 10 years ago, oncologists have gained wide experience in using the oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine, as monotherapy or in combination with other agents and the body of evidence supporting these approaches continues to grow. Alongside this increasing experience has been the appearance of new challenges in patient management. We now recognise several different biological subtypes of breast cancer, such as HER2-positive disease. The standard of care in these tumours comprises anti-HER2 therapy, and phase III data show that capecitabine can be effectively combined with such agents. Another increasingly prominent and currently unresolved issue resulting from more effective treatment of metastatic disease is the management of patients with brain metastases. The introduction of new, well-tolerated, oral chemotherapies also provides the opportunity for longer duration of therapy. These new clinical scenarios are discussed in the current review.

Estrogens play important roles in breast cancer development and progression. In postmenopausal women, traditional endocrine therapies such as tamoxifen have sought to inhibit estrogen action by targeting the estrogen receptor itself. However, newer treatments are evolving that target estrogen production in postmenopausal tissues through inhibition of the aromatase enzyme. Clinical data demonstrate that these aromatase inhibitors are superior to tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer and have now replaced tamoxifen as first line therapy in a number of treatment regimens for postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

Anthracyclines are considered to be among the most active agents for the treatment of breast cancer. However, their use is limited by cumulative, dose-related cardiotoxicity. Such cardiotoxicity results in a permanent loss of cardiac myocytes and a progressive reduction in cardiac function following each subsequent dose of anthracycline. Initially, damage to the heart is subclinical; however, increasingly impaired cardiac function can result in cardiovascular symptoms, with serious cardiac injury resulting in chronic heart failure. Since the early detection and treatment of cardiotoxicity can reduce its clinical effects, it is important that oncologists are aware of these adverse effects and manage them appropriately. This review examines the risk factors for anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity and offers recommendations on strategies to reduce the cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines in the management of patients with advanced breast cancer.

More women are living with and surviving breast cancer, because of improvements in breast cancer care. Trastuzumab (Herceptin®▾) has significantly improved outcomes for women with HER2-positive tumours. Concerns about the cardiac effects of trastuzumab (which fundamentally differ from the permanent myocyte loss associated with anthracyclines) led to the development of cardiac guidelines for adjuvant trials, which are used to monitor patient safety in clinical practice. Clinical experience has shown that the trial protocols are not truly applicable to the breast cancer population as a whole, and exclude some women from receiving trastuzumab, even though they might benefit from treatment without long-term adverse cardiac sequelae. Consequently, five oncologists who recruited patients to trastuzumab trials, some cardiologists with whom they work, and a cardiovascular lead general practitioner reviewed the current cardiac guidelines in the light of recent safety data and their experience with adjuvant trastuzumab. The group devised recommendations that promote proactive pharmacological management of cardiac function in trastuzumab-treated patients, and that apply to all patients who are likely to receive standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. Key recommendations include: a monitoring schedule that assesses baseline and on-treatment cardiac function and potentially reduces the overall number of assessments required; intervention strategies with cardiovascular medication to improve cardiac status before, during, and after treatment; simplified rules for starting, interrupting and discontinuing trastuzumab; and a multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer care.

Questionnaires were circulated to UK patients and health care professionals (HCPs) participating in the Taxotere as Adjuvant ChemoTherapy (TACT) trial in autumn 2004 asking if and how trial results, when available, should be conveyed to patients. A total of 1431 (37% of surviving UK TACT patients) returned questionnaires. In all, 30 (2%) patients did not want results. In all, 554 (40%) patients preferred to receive them via their hospital; 664 (47%) preferred results posted directly to their home, 177 (13%) preferred a letter providing a telephone number to request results. Six hundred and twelve patients thought results should come directly from the trials office. One hundred and seventy-six HCPs from 89 UK centres (86%) returned questionnaires. In all, 169 out of 176 patients (96%) thought results should be written in lay terms for patients. Seventy (41%) preferred patients to receive results via their hospital; 64 (38%) preferred a letter providing a telephone number to request results, and 32 (19%) preferred results posted directly to patients. Thirty-one HCPs (18%) thought results to patients should come directly from the trials office. A total of 868 (61%) patients thought next of kin of deceased patients should receive results, 543 (38%) did not; 47 (27%) HCPs thought they should; 118 (68%) did not.

Objective: Bone metastases can occur in many forms of cancer. More than two-thirds of women with metastatic breast cancer may be affected by bone metastasis during the course of their disease. Bisphosphonates, which inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, are an established standard of care for patients with bone metastases. For patients with cancer and bone metastases, bisphosphonates are associated with a significant reduction in skeletal-related events such as vertebral fractures, non-vertebral fractures as well as increasing the time to skeletal event. The purpose of this study was to quantify the current time involved in the administration of IV bisphosphonates and how this might impact on patient experience and cancer unit capacity. Research design and methods: A pilot audit was initially conducted at the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH), London (both Chelsea and Sutton sites), and was followed by audits at a further two UK hospital sites: Velindre Hospital, Cardiff and the Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford. The study was conducted between December 2005 and September 2006. Results: Overall, 151 forms were completed. Of the total patients audited, approximately 71% had a diagnosis of breast cancer. Where data on the reason for attendance were collected (Velindre and the Royal Surrey County Hospital), over 77% of patients attended hospital for the sole reason of having an IV bisphosphonate administered. The majority of patients (94%) required cannulation prior to infusion and, at the sites where this information was recorded (Royal Surrey County Hospital and Velindre Hospital), almost one-third of patients required two or more attempts before they were successfully cannulated. The time that the patients spent on the unit where the IV bisphosphonates were administered was greater for patients receiving pamidronate compared to those receiving zoledronic acid (2 h 36 min and 1 h 38 min, respectively). The magnitude of the difference was not as great as would be expected considering zoledronic acid should take one-sixth of the time to administer (Royal Marsden Hospital, pamidronate 1 h 29 min, zoledronic acid 18 min: Royal Surrey County Hospital, zoledronic acid 21 min: Velindre Hospital, pamidronate 1 h 42 min, zoledronic acid 17 min). Conclusions: IV bisphosphonates are accepted as standard clinical practice for the management of metastatic bone disease. They are often prescribed for long periods of time, so tolerability and patient acceptability are important factors in therapy. The administration of IV bisphosphonates contributes a substantial time burden for patients travelling to the hospital, considering that in most cases the purpose is for this treatment only. It also places a significant burden on hospital resources, creating capacity planning challenges. Receiving an IV bisphosphonate also has other disadvantages associated with it, such as the need for patients to undergo repeated cannulation. Service redesign, such as home administration of IV bisphosphonates, could help to overcome issues highlighted in this audit. The use of oral alternatives to pamidronate and zoledronic acid which may be more convenient for patients, and perhaps also cost-effective, should also be of ongoing interest.

Background: Chromosomal instability (CIN) has been shown to be associated with drug resistance and poor clinical outcome in several cancer types. However, in oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer we have previously demonstrated that extreme CIN is associated with improved clinical outcome, consistent with a negative impact of CIN on tumour fitness and growth. The aim of this current study was to validate this finding using previously defined CIN thresholds in a much larger prospective cohort from a randomised, controlled, clinical trial. Patients and methods: As a surrogate measurement of CIN, dual centromeric fluorescence in situ hybridisation was performed for both chromosomes 2 and 15 on 1173 tumours from the breast cancer TACT trial (CRUK01/ 001). Each tumour was scored manually and the mean percentage of cells deviating from the modal centromere number was used to define four CIN groups (MCD1-4), where tumours in the MCD4 group were defined as having extreme CIN. Results: In a multivariate analysis of disease-free survival, with a median follow-up of 91 months, increasing CIN was associated with improved outcome in patients with ER-negative cancer (P trend = 0.03). A similar pattern was seen in ERnegative/ HER2-negative cancers (Ptrend = 0.007). Conclusions: This prospective validation cohort study further substantiated the association between extreme CIN and improved outcome in ER-negative breast cancers. Identifying such patients with extreme CIN may help distinguish good from poor prognostic groups, and therefore support treatment and risk stratification in this aggressive breast cancer subtype.

Background: The incidence of anaemia is high in many chronic conditions, yet it often receives little attention. Scope/methods: A panel of international experts with experience in haematology, nephrology, oncology, rheumatology and pharmacy was convened to prepare strategic guidelines. A focused literature search was conducted after key issues had been identified. A series of recommendations was agreed, backed, wherever possible, by published evidence which is included in the annotations. Recommendations: Anaemia is a critical issue for patients with chronic diseases. Healthcare professionals need to recognise that anaemia is a frequent companion of cancer and chronic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and heart failure. It reduces patients' quality of life and can increase morbidity and mortality. Anaemia should be considered as a disordered process in which the rate of red cell production fails to match the rate of destruction which leads eventually to a reduction in haemoglobin concentration; this process is common to all chronic anaemias. The aim of anaemia management should be to restore patient functionality and quality of life by restoring effective red cell production. Blood transfusion can elevate haemoglobin concentration in the short term but does nothing to address the underlying disorder; red cell transfusion is, therefore, not an appropriate treatment for chronic anaemia. Patients with anaemia of chronic disease may benefit from iron therapy and/or erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs). Intravenous iron should be considered since this can be given safely to patients with chronic diseases while intramuscular iron causes unacceptable adverse effects and oral iron has limited efficacy in chronic anaemia. Conclusion: The management of anaemia calls for the development of a specialist service together with education of all healthcare professionals and transfer of skills from areas of good practice. Improvement in the management of anaemia requires a fundamental change of attitude from healthcare professionals. Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1185/030079906x100096