Search

To form a proper mitotic spindle, centrosomes must be duplicated and driven poleward in a timely and controlled fashion. Improper timing of centrosome separation and errors in mitotic spindle assembly may lead to chromosome instability, a hallmark of cancer. Protein kinase C epsilon (PKCϵ) has recently emerged as a regulator of several cell-cycle processes associated with the resolution of mitotic catenation during the metaphase–anaphase transition and in regulating the abscission checkpoint. However, an engagement of PKCϵ in earlier (pre)mitotic events has not been addressed. Here, we now establish that PKCϵ controls prophase-to-metaphase progression by coordinating centrosome migration and mitotic spindle assembly in transformed cells. This control is exerted through cytoplasmic dynein function. Importantly, it is also demonstrated that the PKCϵ dependency of mitotic spindle organization is correlated with the nonfunctionality of the TOPO2A-dependent G2 checkpoint, a characteristic of many transformed cells. Thus, PKCϵ appears to become specifically engaged in a programme of controls that are required to support cell-cycle progression in transformed cells, advocating for PKCϵ as a potential cancer therapeutic target.Implications: The close relationship between PKCϵ dependency for mitotic spindle organization and the nonfunctionality of the TOPO2A-dependent G2 checkpoint, a hallmark of transformed cells, strongly suggests PKCϵ as a therapeutic target in cancer. Mol Cancer Res; 16(1); 3–15. ©2017 AACR.

This figure show that Ciliobrevin treatment results in mitotic spindle defects, delay of centrosome movement and bending phenotype.

Here are described the Supplementary Figures from Figure S1 to Figure S4.

Protein kinase C epsilon (PKCε) plays important roles in behavioral responses to alcohol and in anxiety-like behavior in rodents, making it a potential drug target for reducing alcohol consumption and anxiety. Identifying signals downstream of PKCε could reveal additional targets and strategies for interfering with PKCε signaling. We used a chemical genetic screen combined with mass spectrometry to identify direct substrates of PKCε in mouse brain, and validated findings for 39 of them using peptide arrays and in vitro kinase assays. Prioritizing substrates with several public databases such as LINCS-1000, STRING, GeneFriends, and GeneMAINA, predicted interactions between these putative substrates and PKCε, and identified substrates associated with alcohol-related behaviors, actions of benzodiazepines, and chronic stress. The 39 substrates could be broadly classified in three functional categories: cytoskeletal regulation, morphogenesis, and synaptic function. These results provide a list of brain PKCε substrates, many of which are novel, for future investigation to determine the role of PKCε signaling in alcohol responses, anxiety, responses to stress, and other related behaviors.

Topoisomerase 2a (Topo2a)-dependent G2 arrest engenders faithful segregation of sister chromatids, yet in certain tumor cell lines where this arrest is dysfunctional, a PKCε-dependent failsafe pathway can be triggered. Here we elaborate on recent advances in understanding the underlying mechanisms associated with this G2 arrest by determining that p53–p21 signaling is essential for efficient arrest in cell lines, in patient-derived cells, and in colorectal cancer organoids. Regulation of this p53 axis required the SMC5/6 complex, which is distinct from the p53 pathways observed in the DNA damage response. Topo2a inhibition specifically during S phase did not trigger G2 arrest despite affecting completion of DNA replication. Moreover, in cancer cells reliant upon the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) mechanism, a distinct form of Topo2a-dependent, p53-independent G2 arrest was found to be mediated by BLM and Chk1. Importantly, the previously described PKCε-dependent mitotic failsafe was engaged in hTERT-positive cells when Topo2a-dependent G2 arrest was dysfunctional and where p53 was absent, but not in cells dependent on the ALT mechanism. In PKCε knockout mice, p53 deletion elicited tumors were less aggressive than in PKCε-replete animals and exhibited a distinct pattern of chromosomal rearrangements. This evidence suggests the potential of exploiting synthetic lethality in arrest-defective hTERT-positive tumors through PKCε-directed therapeutic intervention.Significance:The identification of a requirement for p53 in stringent Topo2a-dependent G2 arrest and engagement of PKCε failsafe pathways in arrest-defective hTERT-positive cells provides a therapeutic opportunity to induce selective synthetic lethality.

Many cancers are termed immunoevasive due to expression of immunomodulatory ligands. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and cluster of differentiation 80/86 (CD80/86) interact with their receptors, programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), respectively, on tumor-infiltrating leukocytes eliciting immunosuppression. Immunotherapies aimed at blocking these interactions are revolutionizing cancer treatments, albeit in an inadequately described patient subset. To address the issue of patient stratification for immune checkpoint intervention, we quantitatively imaged PD-1/PD-L1 interactions in tumor samples from patients, employing an assay that readily detects these intercellular protein–protein interactions in the less than or equal to 10 nm range. These analyses across multiple patient cohorts demonstrated the intercancer, interpatient, and intratumoral heterogeneity of interacting immune checkpoints. The PD-1/PD-L1 interaction was not correlated with clinical PD-L1 expression scores in malignant melanoma. Crucially, among anti-PD-1–treated patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer, those with lower PD-1/PD-L1 interaction had significantly worsened survival. It is surmised that within tumors selecting for an elevated level of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction, there is a greater dependence on this pathway for immune evasion and hence, they exhibit more impressive patient response to intervention.Significance:Quantitation of immune checkpoint interaction by direct imaging demonstrates that immunotherapy-treated patients with metastatic NSCLC with a low extent of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction show significantly worse outcome.

Supplementary Figure from Genome-Protective Topoisomerase 2a-Dependent G2 Arrest Requires p53 in hTERT-Positive Cancer Cells

Supplementary FRET Methods

Supplementary Figures and Tables

Supplementary Table from Genome-Protective Topoisomerase 2a-Dependent G2 Arrest Requires p53 in hTERT-Positive Cancer Cells

Table S1. Cell Line Information. Table S2. ChIP reagents. Figure S1. APOBEC3B upregulation by PMA in multiple cell lines. Figure S2. APOBEC3 mRNA levels in PMA-treated MCF10A. Figure S3. Extended timecourse for PMA induction of APOBEC3B. Figure S4. Viability controls for MCF10A cells treated with small molecule inhibitors. Figure S5. Expanded ChIP data for MCF10A cells treated with PMA alone or in combination with AEB071. Figure S6. Viability controls for cancer cell lines treated with AEB071.

Supplementary Figure 2: Localization of endogenous Akt and pAkt (pT308) in SKBR3 cells and FFPE human breast tumor tissues using TSA amplified immunofluorescence.

Supplementary Table S1: Genes that impair cell viability (Z-Score < -2) in at least 3/5 cell lines (PC9 (lung), RCC4 (kidney), HCT116 (colon), MCF-10A (breast) and HT1080 (fibrosarcoma)) in RNAi screens and their Z-scores. These genes were regarded as proliferation genes. Supplementary Table S2: GO Term Enrichment for Proliferation Genes (RNAi Screens) found in Supplementary Table S1. Supplementary Table S3: Candidate core regulators prior to CONEXIC analysis. Supplementary Table S4: GO Term Enrichment of Top 30 Key Regulators. Supplementary Table S5: Top 50 GO Terms Enriched for Module Genes Belonging to Core Regulators from Table 1. P-Values were derived by Fishers Exact Test. The GO analysis for each core regulator module was done independently of the other core regulator modules. Supplementary Table S6: The amplified core regulators TPX2, AURKA, UBE2C, EXO1, MYBL2, TPT1, KIF14 and UBE2T are also members of at least one breast cancer prognostic signature.

Atypical PKCs are cell polarity kinases that operate at the plasma membrane where they function within multiple molecular complexes to contribute to the establishment and maintenance of polarity. In contrast to the classical and novel PKCs, atypical PKCs do not respond to diacylglycerol cues to bind the membrane compartment. Until recently it was not clear how aPKCs are recruited; whether aPKCs can directly interact with membranes or whether they are dependent on other protein interactors to do so. Two recent studies identified the pseudo-substrate region and the C1 domain as direct membrane interaction modules, however their relative importance and coupling are unknown. We combined molecular modelling and functional assays to show that the regulatory module of aPKCι, comprising the PB1 pseudo-substrate and C1 domains, forms a cooperative and spatially continuous invariant membrane interaction platform. Furthermore, we show the coordinated orientation of membrane-binding elements within the regulatory module requires a key PB1-C1 interfacial β-strand (BSL). We show this element contains a highly conserved Tyr residue that can be phosphorylated and that negatively regulates the integrity of the regulatory module, leading to membrane release. We thus expose a novel regulatory mechanism of aPKCι membrane binding and release during cell polarization.

Research in network monitoring spans a large and growing number of disciplines, including mathematics, physics, computer science, and statistics. Here, the panelists discuss the advantages and disa...

BackgroundThe protein kinase PKN2 is required for embryonic development, and PKN2 knockout mice die as a result of failure in expansion of mesoderm tissues, cardiac development and neural tube closure. In the adult, cardiomyocyte PKN2 and PKN1 (in combination) are required for cardiac adaptation to pressure-overload. The role of PKN2 in contractile cardiomyocytes during development and its role in the adult heart remain to be fully established.MethodsWe used mice with cardiomyocyte-directed knockout of PKN2 or global PKN2 haploinsufficiency. Cardiac function and dimensions were assessed with high resolution episcopic microscopy, MRI, micro-CT and echocardiography. Biochemical and histological changes were assessed.ResultsCardiomyocyte-directed PKN2 knockout embryos displayed striking abnormalities in the compact myocardium, with frequent myocardial clefts and diverticula, ventricular septal defects and abnormal heart shape. The sub-Mendelian homozygous knockout survivors developed cardiac failure. RNASeq data showed upregulation of PKN2 in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, suggesting an involvement in adult heart disease. Given the rarity of homozygous survivors with cardiomyocyte-specific deletion of PKN2, this was explored using mice with constitutive heterozygous PKN2 knockout. Cardiac hypertrophy resulting from hypertension induced by angiotensin II was reduced in haploinsufficient PKN2 mice relative to wild-type littermates, with suppression of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis.ConclusionsCardiomyocyte PKN2 is essential for heart development and formation of compact myocardium, and is also required for cardiac hypertrophy in hypertension. Thus, PKN signalling may offer therapeutic options for managing congenital and adult heart diseases.

A requirement for PKCε in exiting from the Aurora B dependent abscission checkpoint is associated with events at the midbody, however, the recruitment, retention and action of PKCε in this compartment are poorly understood. Here, the prerequisite for 14-3-3 complex assembly in this pathway is directly linked to the phosphorylation of Aurora B S227 at the midbody. However, while essential for PKCε control of Aurora B, 14-3-3 association is shown to be unnecessary for the activity-dependent enrichment of PKCε at the midbody. This localisation is demonstrated to be an autonomous property of the inactive PKCε D532N mutant, consistent with activity-dependent dissociation. The C1A and C1B domains are necessary for this localisation, while the C2 domain and inter-C1 domain (IC1D) are necessary for retention at the midbody. Furthermore, it is shown that while the IC1D mutant retains 14-3-3 complex proficiency, it does not support Aurora B phosphorylation, nor rescues division failure observed with knockdown of endogenous PKCε. It is concluded that the concerted action of multiple independent events facilitates PKCε phosphorylation of Aurora B at the midbody to control exit from the abscission checkpoint.