Search

Patients with Parkinson’s disease often suffer from OFF symptoms disrupting their daily routines and adding to disabilities. Despite polypharmacy and adjustments to medication schedules, they often do not experience consistent relief from their motor symptoms. As the disease progresses, impaired gastric emptying may evolve, making it even more challenging for dopaminergic drugs to provide consistent results. This review focuses on a group of drugs that have the pharmacokinetic advantage of a much earlier onset of action by virtue of their non-oral routes of absorption. We compare the current marketed options: subcutaneous apomorphine, sublingual apomorphine, and inhaled levodopa. Subcutaneous apomorphine is the speediest to take effect, whereas sublingual apomorphine offers the longest clinical effect. Inhaled levodopa has the most favorable side effect profile among the three options. An inhaled form of apomorphine is currently under development, having passed safety and efficacy studies. Each of these drugs has unique characteristics for the user, including different side effect profiles and onset of action. The best choice for a patient will depend on individual needs and circumstances. In this review, we explore those nuances to allow clinicians to select the best option for their patients.

Background: Hypokinetic dysarthria and dysphagia are known features of Parkinson’s disease; however, self-perception of their handicapping effects on emotional, physical, and functional aspects of quality of life over disease duration is less understood. Objective: 1) Based upon patient self-perception, to determine the relationship of the handicapping effects of dysphagia and dysphonia with time since diagnosis in individuals with Parkinson’s disease; 2)To determine if there is a relationship between voice and swallowing handicap throughout the course of Parkinson’s disease. Method: 277 subjects completed the Dysphagia Handicap Index and the Voice Handicap Index. Subjects were divided into three groups based on disease duration: 0–4 years, 5–9 years, and 10 + years. Results: Subjects in the longer duration group identified significantly greater perceptions of voice and swallowing handicap compared to the shorter duration groups. There was a significant positive correlation between the DHI and VHI. Conclusion: Self-perception of swallowing and voice handicap in Parkinson’s disease are associated with later stages of disease and progress in a linear fashion. Self-perception of voice and swallowing handicap parallel each other throughout disease progression in Parkinson’s disease. Individuals may be able to compensate for changes in voice and swallowing early while sensory perceptual feedback is intact. Results support early targeted questioning of patient self-perception of voice and swallowing handicap as identification of one problem indicates awareness of the other, thus creating an opportunity for early treatment and maintenance of swallowing and communication quality of life for as long as possible.

Introduction: The most widely used pharmacological treatment for Parkinson’s disease is levodopa, the precursor for dopamine formation in the brain. Over time, the effectiveness of levodopa decline...

Background Continuous, subcutaneous (SC) levodopa/carbidopa infusion with ND0612 is under development as a treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor fluctuations. Objective Evaluate 1-year safety data. Methods BeyoND is an open-label study evaluating the long-term safety of two ND0612 dosing regimens. Results Of the 214 enrolled patients (24-hour SC infusion: n = 90; 16-hour SC infusion: n = 124), 120 (56%) completed 12 months of treatment. Leading causes for study discontinuation were consent withdrawal (19.6%) and adverse events (17.3%). Rates of discontinuation were reduced from 49% to 29% after a protocol revision and retraining. Systemic safety was typical for PD patients treated with levodopa/carbidopa. Most patients experienced infusion site reactions, particularly nodules (30.8%) and hematoma (25.2%), which were judged mostly mild to moderate and led to discontinuation in only 10.3% of the participants. Conclusions Subcutaneous levodopa/carbidopa continuous infusion with ND0612 is generally safe, with typical infusion site reactions for SC delivery as the main adverse event. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

The clinician’s assessment of tremor begins with an understanding that its diagnosis involves a probabilistic exercise and that physiological and essential tremor are the most common manifestations. Recognizing the different forms of resting, postural, action, and orthostatic tremor require clinical skills that need to be integral to the education of neurologists. Essential tremor, the most common pathological tremor syndrome, is easily diagnosed in its most common contexts but as a probabilistic diagnosis, sometimes requires the exclusion of other disorders that also manifest tremor, including medications and various hyperkinetic neurological disorders. Diagnosing other types of tremor is often an “educated guess” on a probabilistic basis, since the underlying pathology that generates tremor is generally hidden. Tremor assessment can take advantage of several rating scales that have been developed for categorizing the distribution and severity of tremor as well as its impact on experiences of daily life. Gauging the physiological characteristics of tremor has also benefited from technological advances that offer increased precision in measuring tremor and remote monitoring.

MRI has been used to develop biomarkers for movement disorders such as Parkinson disease (PD) and other neurodegenerative disorders with parkinsonism such as progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy. One of these imaging biomarkers is neuromelanin (NM), whose integrity can be assessed from its contrast and volume. NM is found mainly in certain brain stem structures, namely, the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc), the ventral tegmental area, and the locus coeruleus. Another major biomarker is brain iron, which often increases in concert with NM degeneration. These biomarkers have the potential to improve diagnostic certainty in differentiating between PD and other neurodegenerative disorders similar to PD, as well as provide a better understanding of pathophysiology. Mapping NM in vivo has clinical importance for gauging the premotor phase of PD when there is a greater than 50% loss of dopaminergic SNpc melanized neurons. As a metal ion chelator, NM can absorb iron. When NM is released from neurons, it deposits iron into the intracellular tissues of the SNpc; the result is iron that can be imaged and measured using quantitative susceptibility mapping. An increase of iron also leads to the disappearance of the nigrosome-1 sign, another neuroimage biomarker for PD. Therefore, mapping NM and iron changes in the SNpc are a practical means for improving early diagnosis of PD and in monitoring disease progression. In this review, we discuss the functions and location of NM, how NM-MRI is performed, the automatic mapping of NM and iron content, how NM-related imaging biomarkers can be used to enhance PD diagnosis and differentiate it from other neurodegenerative disorders, and potential advances in NM imaging methods. With major advances currently evolving for rapid imaging and artificial intelligence, NM-related biomarkers are likely to have increasingly important roles for enhancing diagnostic capabilities in PD. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Introduction CVT-301 (Inbrija®) is a levodopa inhalation powder for on-demand treatment of OFF episodes in Parkinson's disease patients treated with carbidopa/levodopa. Safety and efficacy results of a 12-month, dose-level blinded extension study of a phase 3 trial (SPAN℠-PD) of CVT-301 are presented. Methods Patients were receiving oral carbidopa/levodopa and adjunctive CVT-301 treatment, blinded to dose (60 mg or 84 mg, N = 325). Study visits occurred every 3 months. Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry. Other safety assessments included dyskinesia and adverse events (AEs). Secondary objectives of the study included maintenance of improvement assessments for occurrence of an ON state during the 60-min post-dose period, change in total daily OFF time, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Results Most frequent AEs (≥5%) were cough (15.4%), fall (13.1%), upper respiratory tract infection (7.1%), and dyskinesia (5.1%). Severe AEs (>1 event) were cough (1.9%) and dyskinesia (0.6%). Twelve-month mean changes from baseline for FEV1, FVC, and DLCO were −0.092 L, −0.097 L, and −0.922 mL/min/mmHg, respectively. At 12 months, 73.0% of patients on 84 mg achieved an ON state within 60 min. Total daily OFF time was reduced by 0.55 h (month 1) and 0.88 h (month 12) for the 84 mg dose. Percentage of patients self-reported as improved by PGIC was 65.5–91.9% over 12 months. Conclusion CVT-301 was generally well-tolerated. Twelve-month decline in pulmonary function was consistent with a prior PD control group. Exploratory efficacy results showed CVT-301 maintained improvement at achieving ON states in patients experiencing OFF episodes, decreasing daily OFF time, and maintaining improvement in PGIC.

Laboratory and clinical experience have pointed to the value of targeting motor pathways emerging from the striatum to treat problems arising in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). These pathways are selectively populated with a subtype of adenosine binding sites (A2A receptors) that offer a target for improving PD symptomatology. Several compounds were developed that possess high selectivity and potency for blocking this receptor. Three of these compounds - istradefylline, preladenant, and tozadenant - were chosen for clinical development programs that culminated in Phase 3 multicenter randomized clinical trials. Each of these drugs exert virtually no off-target neurochemical effects. Clinical trials with these drugs focused upon reducing OFF time when administered adjunctly to levodopa and other antiparkinsonian medications. Despite promising Phase 2 data, preladenant did not show efficacy when tested in a randomized placebo-controlled Phase 3 clinical trial. Reports of hematological toxicity necessitated ceasing an ongoing Phase 3 investigation of tozadenant. Following a challenging approval process, based on the results of randomized clinical trials carried out in the U.S. and Japan, istradefylline received approval in these countries for treatment of OFF episodes.

IMPORTANCE: Urate elevation, despite associations with crystallopathic, cardiovascular, and metabolic disorders, has been pursued as a potential disease-modifying strategy for Parkinson disease (PD) based on convergent biological, epidemiological, and clinical data. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sustained urate-elevating treatment with the urate precursor inosine slows early PD progression. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND SETTING: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of oral inosine treatment in early PD. A total of 587 individuals consented, and 298 with PD not yet requiring dopaminergic medication, striatal dopamine transporter deficiency, and serum urate below the population median concentration (

Background: Istradefylline is a selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist for the treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) experiencing OFF episodes while on levodopa/decarboxylase inhibitor. Objective: This pooled analysis of eight randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2b/3 studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of istradefylline. Methods: Istradefylline was evaluated in PD patients receiving levodopa with carbidopa/benserazide and experiencing motor fluctuations. Eight 12- or 16-week trials were conducted (n = 3,245); four of these studies were the basis for istradefylline’s FDA approval. Change in OFF time as assessed in patient-completed 24-h PD diaries at Week 12 was the primary endpoint. All studies were designed with common methodology, thereby permitting pooling of data. Pooled analysis results from once-daily oral istradefylline (20 and 40 mg/day) and placebo were evaluated using a mixed-model repeated-measures approach including study as a factor. Results: Among 2,719 patients (placebo, n = 992; 20 mg/day, n = 848; 40 mg/day, n = 879), OFF hours/day were reduced at Week 12 at istradefylline dosages of 20 mg/day (least-squares mean difference [LSMD] from placebo in reduction from baseline [95%CI], –0.38 h [–0.61, –0.15]) and 40 mg/day (–0.45 h [–0.68, –0.22], p

Levodopa is the most effective symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), but a major treatment challenge is that over time, many patients experience periods of return of PD symptoms intermittently through the day, known as OFF periods. OFF periods typically manifest as a return of motor symptoms but can also involve non-motor symptoms and these periods can disrupt good control despite optimization of the oral levodopa regimen. OFF periods emerge in large measure due to a shortening of the duration of clinical benefit from oral levodopa, thought to be related to a progressive loss of dopamine neurons and their ability to store and release levodopa-derived dopamine over many hours. The problem is further compounded by impaired absorption of oral levodopa due to gastroparesis and other factors limiting its uptake in the small intestine, including competition for uptake by meals and their protein content. On-demand therapies are now available for the treatment of OFF episodes in PD and are administered intermittently, on an as-needed basis, on top of the patient's maintenance medication regimen. To be useful, an on-demand medication should take effect more rapidly and reliably than oral levodopa. Options for on-demand therapy for OFF periods have recently increased with the approval of levodopa inhalation powder and sublingual apomorphine as alternatives to the older option of subcutaneous apomorphine injection, each of which avoids the gastrointestinal tract and its potential for absorption delay. On-demand therapy is now available for patients experiencing episodic or intermittent need for rapid and reliable onset of benefit. On-demand therapy may also provide an alternative to more invasive treatment such as infusion of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel and for patients whose OFF episodes are not controlled despite deep brain stimulation.

Parkinson disease (PD) is often associated with postural instability and gait dysfunction that can increase the risk for falls and associated consequences, including injuries, increased burden on healthcare resources, and reduced quality of life. Patients with PD have nearly twice the risk for falls and associated bone fractures compared with their general population counterparts of similar age. Although the cause of falls in patients with PD may be multifactorial, an often under-recognized factor is neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH). nOH is a sustained decrease in blood pressure upon standing whose symptomology can include dizziness/lightheadedness, weakness, fatigue, and syncope. nOH is due to dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system compensatory response to standing and is a consequence of the neurodegenerative processes of PD. The symptoms associated with orthostatic hypotension (OH)/nOH can increase the risk of falls, and healthcare professionals may not be aware of the real-world clinical effect of nOH, the need for routine screening, or the value of early diagnosis of nOH when treating elderly patients with PD. nOH is easily missed and, importantly, healthcare providers may not realize that there are effective treatments for nOH symptoms that could help lessen the fall risk resulting from the condition. This review discusses the burden of, and key risk factors for, falls among patients with PD, with a focus on practical approaches for the recognition, assessment, and successful management of OH/nOH. In addition, insights are provided as to how fall patterns can suggest fall etiology, thereby influencing the choice of intervention.

Introduction Dopamine replacement via levodopa (LD) remains the most effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), yet its use is often associated with motor complications within several years of continued use. The Accordion Pill® (AP-CD/LD) is a novel drug delivery system based on gastric retention of multilayer films containing immediate-release (IR) carbidopa (CD) and immediate- and controlled-release LD. The AP-CD/LD was designed to improve the consistency of LD in the bloodstream while offering patients with PD more consistent symptom management. Methods This phase 2, multicenter, open-label, two-way randomized crossover study included 4 cohorts of participants with PD, each receiving AP-CD/LD (50/250 mg, 50/375 mg or 50/500 mg) twice daily in one treatment period and an active comparator in the other treatment period. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy were evaluated for AP-CD/LD vs IR-CD/LD. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and patient- and investigator-reported measures were also evaluated. Results Compared with IR-CD/LD, treatment with either AP-CD/LD dose resulted in more stable LD plasma concentrations in both fluctuating and non-fluctuating PD patients, and significantly decreased Cmax (57.1% and 66.8% decreases among fluctuating and non-fluctuating patients, respectively). Both AP doses significantly improved standard measures of motor symptoms: (daily OFF time, total ON time, and good ON time), as well as patient- and investigator-assessed measures, versus IR-CD/LD. The safety and tolerability profile of AP-CD/LD was consistent with the known properties of IR-CD/LD. Conclusions AP technology demonstrated effective controlled-release PK performance and reduced motor response fluctuations in advanced PD patients. A phase 3 randomized controlled trial is currently underway.

The expanding landscape of options for Parkinson's disease (PD) therapeutics calls for novel ways to improve delivery of treatments to counteract neurodegeneration or enhance symptomatic control. This unmet need is particularly relevant for opportunities in gene therapy, which, in recent PD clinical trials, has required invasive neurosurgical approaches into the CNS. One of the promising techniques to bring new therapies into the brain for PD therapeutics involves an evolving technology, focused ultrasound. Focused ultrasound has been used to alleviate tremor by thermal ablation with high-energy sonication. Using similar equipment but much lower sonication energy, focused ultrasound assisted with micro-bubbles can temporarily open the blood-brain barrier at specific brain targets to facilitate real-time magnetic resonance-guided delivery of therapeutic agents. To explore the current status and future of focused ultrasound in transvascular therapeutics for PD, a November 2018 workshop reviewed its accomplishments and challenges. This report summarizes key points of discussion and provides further background to the promising roles focused ultrasound offers. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

COVID-19 infection of the CNS has manifested with several characteristic neurological deficits. Among these are early and sometimes prominent reductions in sense of smell and taste. A few instances of movement disorders have been described, among them myoclonus, orthostatic tremor, ataxic gait, and serotonin syndrome. While the mechanisms of movement disorders and encephalopathy from COVID-19 infection have not been worked out, a few instances of autopsy evidence include findings of, as demonstrated by neuropathological and radiological findings, small hemorrhages and infarctions. Encephalopathy from COVID-19 can present acutely with impaired alertness unrelated to hypoxia and residual deficits in cognition can be long-term outcomes.

Highlights This prospective study is one of the largest clinical trials in essential tremor to date. Study findings suggest that individualized non-invasive neuromodulation therapy used repeatedly at home over three months results in safe and effective hand tremor reduction and improves quality of life for many essential tremor patients. Background: Two previous randomized, controlled, single-session trials demonstrated efficacy of non-invasive neuromodulation therapy targeting the median and radial nerves for reducing hand tremor. This current study evaluated efficacy and safety of the therapy over three months of repeated home use. Methods: This was a prospective, open-label, post-clearance, single-arm study with 263 patients enrolled across 26 sites. Patients were instructed to use the therapy twice daily for three months. Pre-specified co-primary endpoints were improvements on clinician-rated Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) and patient-rated Bain & Findley Activities of Daily Living (BF-ADL) dominant hand scores. Other endpoints included improvement in the tremor power detected by an accelerometer on the therapeutic device, Clinical and Patient Global Impression scores (CGI-I, PGI-I), and Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) survey. Results: 205 patients completed the study. The co-primary endpoints were met (p≪0.0001), with 62% (TETRAS) and 68% (BF-ADL) of ‘severe’ or ‘moderate’ patients improving to ‘mild’ or ‘slight’. Clinicians (CGI-I) reported improvement in 68% of patients, 60% (PGI-I) of patients reported improvement, and QUEST improved (p = 0.0019). Wrist-worn accelerometer recordings before and after 21,806 therapy sessions showed that 92% of patients improved, and 54% of patients experienced ≥50% improvement in tremor power. Device-related adverse events (e.g., wrist discomfort, skin irritation, pain) occurred in 18% of patients. No device-related serious adverse events were reported. Discussion: This study suggests that non-invasive neuromodulation therapy used repeatedly at home over three months results in safe and effective hand tremor reduction in many essential tremor patients.

Laboratory and clinical experience have pointed to the value of targeting motor pathways emerging from the striatum to treat problems arising in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). These pathways are selectively populated with a subtype of adenosine binding sites (A

Compared to other neurodegenerative diseases, Parkinson's disease (PD) is distinctive in terms of marked symptomatic variability and prognosis, as well as for the wide variety of symptomatic treatment options. Despite several decades of advances in medications and neurosurgical approaches, there remains an unmet need for symptomatic motor control. Better control of tremor, gait and balance, posture, dexterity, and communication skills are major challenges for better therapeutics of the PD movement disorder. Non-motor symptoms (NMS), which often precede motor impairments, add complexity to the burden of PD and its management. Recognized by James Parkinson MD two centuries ago, and despite 21st century neurological advances, a range of NMS plague the patient's journey, from prodromal to palliative stages. Characterizing the clinical phenotype of the entire non-motor profile of PD is challenging. Further research and understanding are needed for discovering biomarkers of certain NMS, such as dementia, fatigue, pain, sleep, and apathy. More work is needed to gather a robust evidence base for guiding treatment of troubling NMS, which exert a major impact on quality of life for people with PD and their caregivers.

Investigation of disease-specific biomarkers has the potential to advance the understanding of what causes Parkinson's disease (PD) and can lead to discovery of better treatments. Although PD's clinical features can be unmistakable, current laboratory methods have not enhanced its recognition. Over several decades, many attempts have sought out potential neurochemical indicators of PD diagnosis and progression. A logical starting point for this search has been cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), a biospecimen contiguous with the brain sites of pathology in this disorder. Guiding the search for biomarkers has been an understanding that neurons undergoing degeneration manifest distinct physiological changes such as abnormal protein aggregation, altered mitochondrial function, and a decline in neurotransmitter output. Beyond targeted searches for PD biomarkers, some studies have taken an exploratory approach by profiling large numbers of CSF constituents in the hopes of a successful discovery. This chapter will review the highlights of several decades of investigation into CSF PD biomarkers.

Parkinson’s disease psychosis (PDP) is a disabling non-motor symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD) that is challenging to treat. Dopamine receptor blockers (DRB) are used to treat PDP, though these may be associated with adverse effects, including worsening of Parkinsonism. Pimavanserin, a selective 5-HT2A receptor inverse agonist, was recently FDA-approved for treatment of PDP; however, there is limited information on its long-term use in PDP patients. A retrospective chart review of patients prescribed pimavanserin was performed in August, 2017. Data on demographics, psychotic features, sleep, and adverse effects was collected using a semi-structured telephone interview with patients or caregivers. Hallucination severity (HS) was quantified as mild (

Background: CVT-301, an inhaled levodopa (LD) formulation, is under development for relief of OFF periods in Parkinson's disease (PD). Previously, we reported that CVT-301 improved OFF symptoms relative to placebo. In this study, we evaluate pulmonary function in patients treated with a single dose of CVT-301 or placebo for 3 hours, or received multiple doses/day for 4 weeks. Methods: As part of two phase 2 studies, pulmonary safety and tolerability of CVT-301 were evaluated in PD patients experiencing motor fluctuations (≥2 hours OFF/day), Hoehn and Yahr stage 1–3, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity ratio ≥75% of predicted (in ON state). In study A, patients received single doses of oral carbidopa/LD and each of the following via the inhaled route: placebo and 25 and 50 mg LD fine particle dose (FPD) CVT-301. In study B, patients received up to 3 inhaled doses/day of 35 mg (weeks 1–2) and 50 mg LD FPD CVT-301 (weeks 3–4) versus placebo. Assessments included spirometry and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: In study A, (n = 24) mean age ± standard deviation was 61.3 ± 7.4 years, mean time since diagnosis was 10.5 ± 4.6 years, and mean duration of LD treatment 8.4 ± 3.7 years. Assessment of pulmonary function (predose to 3 hours postdose) showed that spirometry findings were within normal ranges, regardless of treatment groups, or motor status at screening. In study B, (n = 86) mean age was 62.4 ± 8.7 years, time since PD diagnosis was 9.4 ± 3.9 years, and duration of LD treatment 7.8 ± 3.9 years. Longitudinal assessment of pulmonary function over 4 weeks showed no significant difference in spirometry between CVT-301 versus placebo groups. In both studies, the most common CVT-301 TEAE was mild-to-moderate cough (study A: 21%; study B: 7% vs. 2% in placebo). Other common TEAEs in study B were dizziness and nausea. Conclusion: Acute and longitudinal assessment of pulmonary function showed that CVT-301 treatment was not associated with acute airflow obstruction in this population. CVT-301 was generally safe and well tolerated.

Objectives Extended-release (ER) carbidopa-levodopa (CD-LD) (IPX066/RYTARY/NUMIENT) produces improvements in "off" time, "on" time without troublesome dyskinesia, and Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale scores compared with immediate-release (IR) CD-LD or IR CD-LD plus entacapone (CLE). Post hoc analyses of 2 ER CD-LD phase 3 trials evaluated whether the efficacy and safety of ER CD-LD relative to the respective active comparators were altered by concomitant medications (dopaminergic agonists, monoamine oxidase B [MAO-B] inhibitors, or amantadine). Methods ADVANCE-PD (n = 393) assessed safety and efficacy of ER CD-LD versus IR CD-LD. ASCEND-PD (n = 91) evaluated ER CD-LD versus CLE. In both studies, IR- and CLE-experienced patients underwent a 6-week, open-label dose-conversion period to ER CD-LD prior to randomization. For analysis, the randomized population was divided into 3 subgroups: dopaminergic agonists, rasagiline or selegiline, and amantadine. For each subgroup, changes from baseline in PD diary measures ("off" time and "on" time with and without troublesome dyskinesia), Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Parts II + III scores, and adverse events were analyzed, comparing ER CD-LD with the active comparator. Results and conclusions Concomitant dopaminergic agonist or MAO-B inhibitor use did not diminish the efficacy (improvement in "off" time and "on" time without troublesome dyskinesia) of ER CD-LD compared with IR CD-LD or CLE, whereas the improvement with concomitant amantadine failed to reach significance. Safety and tolerability were similar among the subgroups, and ER CD-LD did not increase troublesome dyskinesia. For patients on oral LD regimens and taking a dopaminergic agonist, and/or a MAO-B inhibitor, changing from an IR to an ER CD-LD formulation provides approximately an additional hour of "good" on time.

Mutations in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene are the most common known cause of autosomal dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) and sporadic PD (sPD). The clinical presentation of LRRK2 PD is similar to sPD, and except for genetic testing, no biochemical or imaging markers can differentiate LRRK2 PD from sPD. Discovery of such biomarkers could indicate neuropathological mechanisms that are unique to or increased in LRRK2 PD. This review discusses findings in 17 LRRK2 - related CSF studies found on PubMed. Most of these studies compared analyte concentrations between four diagnostic groups: LRRK2 PD patients, sPD patients, asymptomatic control subjects carrying PD-associated LRRK2 mutations (LRRK2 CTL), and healthy control subjects lacking LRRK2 mutations (CTL). Analytes examined in these studies included Aβ1-42, tau, α-synuclein, oxidative stress markers, autophagy-related proteins, pteridines, neurotransmitter metabolites, exosomal LRRK2 protein, RNA species, inflammatory cytokines, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), and intermediary metabolites. FINDINGS: Pteridines, α-synuclein, mtDNA, 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid, β-D-glucose, lamp2, interleukin-8, and vascular endothelial growth factor were suggested to differentiate LRRK2 PD from sPD patients; 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), 8-isoprostane (8-ISO), 2-hydroxybutyrate, mtDNA, lamp2, and neopterin may differentiate between LRRK2 CTL and LRRK2 PD subjects; and soluble oligomeric α-synuclein, 8-OHdG, and 8-ISO might differentiate LRRK2 CTL from CTL subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The low numbers of investigations of each analyte, small sample sizes, and methodological differences limit conclusions that can be drawn from these studies. Further investigations are indicated to determine the validity of the analytes identified in these studies as possible biomarkers for LRRK2 PD patients and/or LRRK2 CTL subjects.

This report provides data related to the safety and effectiveness of repeated time-varying caloric vestibular stimulation (CVS) as a treatment for motor and non-motor features of Parkinson's disease (PD). Forty-six subjects receiving stable anti-Parkinsonian therapy were randomized to active (n = 23) or placebo (n = 23) treatment arms. Subjects self-administered CVS twice-daily over a period of 8 weeks at home via a portable, pre-programmed, solid-state ThermoNeuroModulation (TNM™) device delivering continually-varying thermal waveforms through aluminium ear-probes mounted on a wearable headset. Change scores from baseline to end of treatment and to a 1-month follow-up were determined using standardized clinical measures. The data presented here report sample demographics, detailed safety data and the statistical outcomes from the intention-to-treat and modified intention-to-treat analyses. These data supplement findings of the main per protocol analysis reported in the allied article entitled, ‘Caloric Vestibular Stimulation for the Management of Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease’ Wilkinson et al. Keywords: Non-invasive brain stimulation, Sensory neuro-modulation, Neuro-rehabilitation, Cognition

OBJECTIVES Although commercially available levodopa (LD) formulations include carbidopa (CD) or benserazide for gastrointestinal L-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase inhibition, little is known how manipulating CD delivery affects the pharmacokinetics of LD. Our research systematically evaluated the peripheral and central pharmacokinetics of LD during continuous subcutaneous CD delivery. METHODS We conducted pharmacokinetic experiments in pigs, mice, and humans to characterize effects of continuous subcutaneous CD delivery co-administered with LD as compared with oral LD/CD administration on LD pharmacokinetics. The porcine and human studies compared peripheral LD pharmacokinetic parameters (area under the curves [AUCs], peak plasma concentrations [Cmax], and plasma elimination half-life [t1/2]) and the mouse studies compared brain LD and dopamine concentrations. RESULTS In the pig, supplementary subcutaneous CD delivery significantly increased the LD t1/2 and AUC versus LD/CD alone and versus additional oral CD administration. In mice, administration of supplementary subcutaneous CD substantially increased mean plasma concentrations of both LD and CD versus oral LD/CD alone at all time points. These increases were mirrored by increased brain dopamine levels for at least the 7 hours of study. In healthy human subjects, continuous subcutaneous CD administration, 3.33 mg/h x24h, increased the plasma LD t1/2, Cmax, and AUC by 17.4%, 40.5%, and 22.3%, respectively (P < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS This series of studies demonstrates that small continuous dosing of subcutaneous CD has an unexpected effect on LD pharmacokinetics greater than the extent of decarboxylase inhibition achieved by additional oral CD administration.

Summary Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension are common manifestations of cardiovascular dysautonomia in Parkinson's disease and related synucleinopathies. Because these disorders are haemodynamic opposites, improvement in one might be achieved at the expense of worsening of the other. Thus, management decisions necessitate assessment of the individual risks for patients with coexistent neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension. Whereas neurogenic orthostatic hypotension poses risks for falls and can be associated with cognitive impairment in the short term, chronic supine hypertension can be associated with stroke and myocardial infarction in the long term. Because few clinical trial data exist for outcomes in patients with coexistent neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension, clinicians need to balance, on the basis of comorbidities and disease staging, the potential immediate benefits of treatment for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and the long-term risks of supine hypertension treatment in each patient. Future research needs to focus on ascertaining a safe degree of supine hypertension when treating neurogenic orthostatic hypotension; the effectiveness of nocturnal antihypertensive therapy in patients with coexistent neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and supine hypertension; and the prevalence, scope, and therapeutic requirements for managing neurogenic orthostatic hypotension that manifests with falls or cognitive impairment, but without postural lightheadedness or near syncope.

Background Although levodopa is the most effective oral PD therapy, many patients experience motor fluctuations, including sudden loss of dose effect and delayed benefit. CVT-301 is a levodopa inhalation powder with the potential for rapid onset of action. The objective of this study was to evaluate CVT-301 self-administered by PD patients to relieve OFF episodes. Methods PD patients with ≥2 hours per day of OFF time despite oral levodopa ≥4 times per day were randomized to CVT-301 or placebo for 4 weeks, to be used up to 3 times per day for OFF episodes. After 2 weeks, the study-drug dose was escalated from 35 to 50 mg. The primary end point was mean change in UPDRS Part III score from a predose OFF state to the average of postdose scores obtained at 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes, as assessed in-clinic at the end of week 4. Home diaries were recorded. Results Eighty-six patients used the study drug at an average frequency of 2.1 times per day for CVT-301 and for placebo. At 4 weeks, least-squares mean change in UPDRS Part III score favored CVT-301 by 7.0 points (P < 0.001). A treatment effect was evident at 10 minutes. At 4 weeks, least-squares mean OFF-time change from baseline favored CVT-301 by 0.9 hours per day (P = 0.045). The most frequently reported adverse events in the CVT-301 group were dizziness, cough, and nausea, each in 7% (3 of 43 patients). Conclusions CVT-301 self-administered during OFF episodes provided rapid improvement of motor function, and daily OFF time was significantly reduced at the higher dose. CVT-301 was generally safe and well-tolerated. © 2016 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Although levodopa is widely recognized as the most effective therapy for Parkinson disease (PD), its introduction 5 decades ago was preceded by several years of uncertainty and equivocal clinical results. The translation of basic neuroscience research by Arvid Carlsson and Oleh Hornykiewicz provided a logical pathway for treating PD with levodopa. Yet the pioneering clinicians who transformed PD therapeutics with this drug--among them Walther Birkmayer, Isamu Sano, Patrick McGeer, George Cotzias, Melvin Yahr, and others--faced many challenges in determining whether the concept and the method for replenishing deficient striatal dopamine was correct. This article reviews highlights in the early development of levodopa therapy. In addition, it provides an overview of emerging drug delivery strategies that show promise for improving levodopa's pharmacologic limitations.

Dopamine replacement via levodopa (LD) remains the most effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), yet its use is often associated with motor complications within several years of continued use. The Accordion PillThis phase 2, multicenter, open-label, two-way randomized crossover study included 4 cohorts of participants with PD, each receiving AP-CD/LD (50/250 mg, 50/375 mg or 50/500 mg) twice daily in one treatment period and an active comparator in the other treatment period. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy were evaluated for AP-CD/LD vs IR-CD/LD. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and patient- and investigator-reported measures were also evaluated.Compared with IR-CD/LD, treatment with either AP-CD/LD dose resulted in more stable LD plasma concentrations in both fluctuating and non-fluctuating PD patients, and significantly decreased CAP technology demonstrated effective controlled-release PK performance and reduced motor response fluctuations in advanced PD patients. A phase 3 randomized controlled trial is currently underway.

Introduction: A recent case study showed that repeated sessions of caloric vestibular stimulation (CVS) relieved motor and non-motor symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Here we sought to confirm these results in a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo treatment-controlled study.\ud \ud Methods: 33 PD subjects receiving stable anti-Parkinsonian therapy completed an active (n = 16) or placebo (n = 17) treatment period. Subjects self-administered CVS at home twice-daily via a portable, pre-programmed, solid-state ThermoNeuroModulation (TNMTM) device, which delivered continually-varying thermal waveforms through aluminum ear-probes mounted on a wearable headset. Subjects were followed over a 4-week baseline period, 8 weeks of treatment and then at 5- and 24-weeks post-treatment. At each study visit, standardized clinical assessments were conducted during ON-medication states to evaluate changes in motor and non-motor symptoms, activities of daily living, and quality of life ratings.\ud \ud Results: Change scores between baseline and the end of treatment showed that active-arm subjects demonstrated clinically-relevant reductions in motor and non-motor symptoms that were significantly greater than placebo- arm subjects. Active treatment was also associated with improved scores on activities of daily living assessments. Therapeutic gains were still evident 5 weeks after the end of active treatment but had started to recede at 24 weeks follow-up. No serious adverse events were associated with device use, and there was high participant satisfaction and tolerability of treatment.\ud \ud Conclusion: The results provide evidence that repeated CVS can provide safe and enduring adjuvant relief for motor and non-motor symptoms associated with PD.

Introduction Impaired nocturnal sleep and excessive daytime sleepiness are common problems for patients with Parkinson's disease, and patients with Parkinson's disease with sleep dysfunction are 5 times more likely to experience psychotic symptoms. Pimavanserin, a 5-HT2A inverse agonist approved to treat Parkinson's disease psychosis, may improve sleep quality in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing sleep disturbances. Methods Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease nighttime sleep (SCOPA-NS) and SCOPA-daytime sleepiness (DS) data obtained during 2 double-blind placebo-controlled studies of pimavanserin in persons with Parkinson's disease psychosis were evaluated. Data from the placebo and pimavanserin 34 mg groups in the 2 studies were pooled to provide further information on the effect of pimavanserin 34 mg on sleep. Additional analyses on the pooled study data were performed on participants with significantly impaired nighttime sleep and daytime sleepiness, defined as SCOPA-NS ≥7 and SCOPA-DS ≥5, respectively. Results In the pooled analysis, treatment effects, expressed as least squares mean reductions in SCOPA-NS at week 6, were -1.4 for pimavanserin 34 mg and -0.5 for placebo. At week 6, the decrease from baseline in SCOPA-DS for the pimavanserin 34 mg group was -1.7 and -1.2 for the placebo group (P = 0.108). When evaluating participants with impaired nighttime sleep and daytime sleepiness at baseline, the SCOPA-NS score change was -4.4 for the pimavanserin 34 mg group and -2.3 for the placebo group (P = 0.002), whereas the SCOPA-DS change was -2.9 and -1.9 for the pimavanserin 34 mg and placebo groups (P = 0.120), respectively. Conclusion The data from the trials suggest that nighttime sleep improved with administration of pimavanserin, a novel 5-HT2A receptor inverse agonist/antagonist.

Background: Cervical dystonia (CD) patients have impaired working memory, processing speed and visual-motor integration ability. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to investigate changes in cerebral oscillations in CD patients during an executive function test, before and after administration of botulinum toxin. Methods: MEG data were collected from five CD patients while they performed a visual continuous performance task (CPT), before and after they received a botulinum toxin injection. MEG data was also collected on five controls matched for age and gender. Coherence source imaging was performed to quantify network connectivity of subjects. Results: Controls demonstrated two errors with visual CPT, CD patients demonstrated six and three errors pre- and post-botulinum toxin respectively. After botulinum toxin, mean time from cue to correct response was 0.337 s in controls, 0.390 s in patients before botulinum toxin injection, and 0.366 s after the injection. Differences in coherence between controls and patients were found in the following brain regions: Fronto-frontal, fronto-parietal, fronto-striatal, fronto-occipital, parieto-parietal and temporo-parietal. Intrahemispheric and interhemispheric networks were affected. Post injection, there was minimal change in coherence in the above-mentioned networks. Discussion: Neuropsychological testing suggests difference in coherence in frontal circuits between CD cases and controls during the visual CPT, which may reflect subjects&rsquo, increased difficulty with the task. Botulinum toxin is associated with minimal improvement with executive function in CD.

Summary Background Patients with Parkinson's disease chronically treated with levodopa commonly have delayed or unpredictable onset of its benefits after oral intake. In this study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of CVT-301, a self-administered levodopa oral inhalation powder, for the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease during off periods. Methods In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, patients were recruited at 65 sites in Canada, Poland, Spain, and the USA. Eligible participants were patients with Parkinson's disease aged 30–85 years, who had daily off periods of 2 h or longer and showed an improvement of 25% or greater in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score from off to on state after use of an oral levodopa plus a dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor combination. Patients were assigned (1:1:1) with a computer-generated randomisation code, in fixed blocks of six, to either CVT-301 60 mg, CVT-301 84 mg, or placebo. Spirometry results and modified Hoehn and Yahr disease stage at screening were used for stratification of treatment groups. Patients, the sponsor, and site personnel were masked to treatment assignment. Each study dose consisted of two capsules administered with an inhaler. Patients were instructed to use the study drug as needed for off periods, and could self-administer up to five doses per day. The primary endpoint was the change in UPDRS motor score from predose to 30 min postdose, assessed at week 12 during an in-clinic off period, in the CVT-301 84 mg group compared with the placebo group. Analysis was by intention to treat. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of experimental treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02240030. Findings Between Dec 4, 2014, and Aug 26, 2016, 351 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive CVT-301 60 mg (115 patients), CVT-301 84 mg (120 patients), or placebo (116 patients). Of these, 339 received the assigned study treatment (CVT-301 60 mg, n=113; CVT-301 84 mg, n=114; placebo, n=112) and 290 completed the study (CVT-301 60 mg, n=96; CVT-301 84 mg, n=97; placebo, n=97). The least-squares mean difference in UPDRS motor score change from predose to 30 min postdose was −5·91 (SE 1·50, 95% CI −8·86 to −2·96) for the placebo group and −9·83 (1·51; −12·79 to −6·87) for the CVT-301 84 mg group (between-group difference −3·92 [–6·84 to −1·00]; p=0·0088). Treatments were safe and well tolerated. Severe adverse events were reported by 2 (2%) of 112 patients in the placebo group, 7 (6%) of 113 in the CVT-301 60 mg group, and 5 (4%) of 114 in the CVT-301 84 mg group, with no severe adverse event occurring in more than one patient in any treatment group. 11 (3%) of 339 patients had 19 serious adverse events (three [3%] of 112 patients in placebo, six [5%] of 113 in CVT-301 60 mg, and two [2%] of 114 in CVT-301 84 mg). Of these, hypotension and atrial fibrillation were assessed by investigators to be possibly related to the study drug. Interpretation CVT-301 can improve UPDRS motor scores of patients with Parkinson's disease during in-clinic off periods, with few severe or serious adverse events. The long-term safety and efficacy of CVT-301 need to be investigated in future studies. Funding Acorda Therapeutics.

Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene mutations are the most common genetic cause of Parkinson's disease (PD). CSF specimens from LRRK2 + PD patients and healthy LRRK2 mutation carriers are, therefore, useful for biomarker studies. This study examined the hypothesis that differences are present between subjects with sporadic PD (sPD), PD carriers of LRRK2 mutations (LRRK2 + PD), healthy control subjects lacking LRRK2 mutations (CTL), and LRRK2 mutation-carrying healthy controls (LRRK2 + CTL) for CSF concentrations of six potential PD biomarkers. Two of these proteins, nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 ("Nrf2") and heat shock 70 kDa protein 8 ("HSPA8"), were detected in preliminary ELISAs, then measured in a larger cohort (60 sPD, 10 LRRK2 + PD, 23 CTL, 31 LRRK2 + CTL). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups (Nrf2 p = 0.13, HSPA8 p = 0.21). Nrf2 concentrations in LRRK2 + PD subjects were strongly positively associated with Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total and motor scores [Spearman rho = 0.77 (p = 0.012) and 0.83 (p = 0.005)] and negatively associated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores (rho = -0.57; p = 0.11). Partial correlation coefficient calculations indicated that disease duration contributed to the associations of Nrf2 levels with UPDRS scores and with MoCA scores in this group. While CSF Nrf2 and HSPA8 do not appear to offer diagnostic biomarkers for PD, the associations between Nrf2 levels and UPDRS scores in LRRK2 + PD patients merit further investigation.

Background Characteristic features of hypokinetic dysarthria develop in Parkinson disease (PD). We hypothesized that quantified acoustic changes of voice might provide a correlate of disease severity. Objective To determine if there are significant differences in acoustic measures of voice between mild and moderate PD; 2) To evaluate correlations between acoustic parameters of voice and subtests of the UPDRS in mild and moderate PD. Methods Twenty six participants with PD underwent vocal acoustic testing while off PD medication, for comparison to 22 healthy controls. Participants with PD were divided into two groups based upon UPDRS activities of daily living (ADL) ratings: summed scores were used to define mild and moderate PD. Participants voiced /i/ ("ee") at comfort, high, and low pitch (3 trials/pitch). The CSpeech Waveform Analysis Program was used to analyze cycle-to-cycle frequency ("jitter") and amplitude ("shimmer") irregularities of the vocal signal, signal-to-noise ratio, and maximum phonation frequency range converted to semitones. Sections of UPDRS scores were correlated to acoustic variables of voice. Results Key findings included a significant difference between the semitone range of the control subjects and the moderate PD group (p = 0.036). Further analyses revealed significant differences in semitone range for males between the controls vs. mild PD (p = 0.014), and controls vs. moderate PD (p = 0.005). Significant correlations were also found between acoustic findings and both the ADL and motor portions of the UPDRS. Conclusions Acoustic analysis of voice, particularly frequency range, may provide a quantifiable correlate of disease progression in PD.

Extensive published evidence supports the use of subcutaneously-administered apomorphine as an effective therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) but to date no consensus recommendations have been available to guide healthcare professionals in the optimal application of apomorphine therapy in clinical practice. This document outlines best-practice recommendations for selecting appropriate candidates for apomorphine intermittent injection (the pen-injection formulation) or apomorphine continuousinfusion (the pump formulation), for initiating patients onto therapy and for managing their ongoing treatment. Apomorphine is a suitable therapeutic option for PD patients who experience troublesome 'off periods despite optimized treatment with oral PD medications. Due to its speed of onset, apomorphine injection is particularly suited to those patients requiring rapid, reliable relief of both unpredictable and predictable 'off' periods, those who require reliable and fast relief when anticipating an 'off', those with levodopa absorption or gastric emptying problems resulting in delayed or failed 'on', or for rapid relief of early morning dystonia or akinesia. Apomorphine infusionl is suited for patients whose 'off periods can no longer be adequately controlled by standard oral PD treatment or for those in whom rescue doses of apomorphine injection are effective but either needed too frequently (more than 4-6 times per day), or are associated with increasing dyskinesia. In addition to treating motor fluctuations, there is evidence that apomorphine infusion may be effective for the management of specific non-motor symptoms of PD associated with 'off' periods. Apomorphine infusion is less invasive than other non-oral treatment options for advancing disease, intrajejunal levodopa infusion and deep-brain stimulation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

The clinical utility of long-term oral levodopa therapy in Parkinson disease (PD) is often limited by the emergence of motor complications. Over time, many patients with PD experience regular and/or unpredictable "off" periods, despite taking optimized oral medication regimens, with a major negative impact on their ability to undertake routine activities of daily living and consequently on their overall quality of life. One established approach for treating patients experiencing off periods and controlling motor fluctuations refractory to conventional oral drug therapy is the subcutaneous administration of the dopaminergic agonist apomorphine. This article outlines how the pharmacokinetic properties of apomorphine underpin its efficacy for the treatment of PD and provides practical guidance for the 3 main approaches in which it is used: subcutaneous intermittent apomorphine injection as a "rescue" therapy for off states, subcutaneous continuous apomorphine infusion for PD patients with intractable motor fluctuations as an alternative to other dopaminergic treatment, and in the apomorphine response (or challenge) test for assessment of dopamine-induced motor response in patients thought to have PD, or in establishing the optimal tolerated dose of apomorphine in patients already known to have PD. Also discussed is the management of potential adverse events with subcutaneous administration of apomorphine, the majority of which are mild and easily managed in practice. The importance of a multidisciplinary PD team in the optimal management of PD patients is now recognized, in particular the role of the specialist PD nurse.