Search

Purpose The purpose of the study was to assess the feasibility of performing intraoperative dosimetry for permanent prostate brachytherapy by combining transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and fluoroscopy/cone beam CT [CBCT] images and accounting for the effect of prostate deformation. Methods and Materials 13 patients underwent TRUS and multiview two-dimensional fluoroscopic imaging partway through the implant, as well as repeat fluoroscopic imaging with the TRUS probe inserted and retracted, and finally three-dimensional CBCT imaging at the end of the implant. The locations of all the implanted seeds were obtained from the fluoroscopy/CBCT images and were registered to prostate contours delineated on the TRUS images based on a common subset of seeds identified on both image sets. Prostate contours were also deformed, using a finite-element model, to take into account the effect of the TRUS probe pressure. Prostate dosimetry parameters were obtained for fluoroscopic and CBCT-dosimetry approaches and compared with the standard-of-care Day-0 postimplant CT dosimetry. Results High linear correlation (R2 > 0.8) was observed in the measured values of prostate D90%, V100%, and V150%, between the two intraoperative dosimetry approaches. The prostate D90% and V100% obtained from intraoperative dosimetry methods were in agreement with the postimplant CT dosimetry. Only the prostate V150% was on average 4.1% (p-value Conclusions The results of this study have shown that both of the proposed dosimetric evaluation approaches have potential for real-time intraoperative dosimetry.

Objective: Radiation dose calculations in the prostate brachytherapy practices have very high importance in terms of the success of treatment. The purpose of the present study is to determine whether there is a significant dose difference between the radiation dose calculations performed in water medium and prostate cancer-diagnosed patients by using the Monte Carlo method. Methods: The radiation dose calculations were performed on 20 prostate patients by using the BrachyDose Monte Carlo code. Phantom geometry derived from real patients computed tomography (CT) data was created to use in dose calculations. Water material was assigned to all voxels within the prostate volume for dose comparison with CT derived phantom. 125I (Amersham, OncoSeed, 6711), 103Pd (Theragenics Co., TheraSeed, 200) and 131Cs (IsoRay Medical) commercial brachytherapy seed models were used in dose calculations. Results: It was observed that there are significant dose differences between the water medium and the prostate tissue. The differences between D90 dose values in prostate tissue and water medium were calculated as 7.2-10.5%, 9.1-13.4% and 5.4-8.3% for 125I, 103Pd and 131Cs brachytherapy seed sources, respectively. Conclusions: It was concluded that material compositions of different organs and tissues in the human body should be considered for more accurate brachytherapy dose calculations.

PURPOSE In situ drug release concurrent with radiation therapy has been proposed to enhance the therapeutic ratio of permanent prostate brachytherapy. Both brachytherapy sources and brachytherapy spacers have been proposed as potential eluters to release compounds, such as nanoparticles or chemotherapeutic agents. The relative effectiveness of the approaches has not been compared yet. This work models the physical dose enhancement of implantable eluters in conjunction with brachytherapy to determine which delivery mechanism provides greatest opportunity to enhance the therapeutic ratio. MATERIALS AND METHODS The combined effect of implanted eluters and radioactive sources were modeled in a manner that allowed the comparison of the relative effectiveness of different types of implantable eluters over a range of parameters. Prostate geometry, source, and spacer positions were extracted from treatment plans used for 125 I permanent prostate implants. Compound concentrations were calculated using steady-state solution to the diffusion equation including an elimination term characterized by the diffusion-elimination modulus (ϕb ). Does enhancement was assumed to be dependent on compound concentration up to a saturation concentration (csat ). Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) was used as an objective to determine the optimal configuration of eluters for a range of diffusion-elimination moduli, concentrations, and number of eluters. The compound delivery vehicle that produced the greatest enhanced dose was tallied for points in parameter space mentioned to determine the conditions under whether there are situations where one approach is preferable to the other. RESULTS The enhanced effect of implanted eluters was calculated for prostate volumes from 14 to 45 cm3 , ϕb from 0.01 to 4 mm-1 , csat from 0.05 to 7.5 times the steady-state compound concentration released from the surface of the eluter. The number of used eluters (ne ) was simulated from 10 to 60 eluters. For the region of (csat , Φ)-space that results in a large fraction of the gland being maximally sensitized, compound eluting spacers or sources produce equal increase in EUD. In the majority of the remaining (csat , Φ)-space, eluting spacers result in a greater EUD than sources even where sources often produce greater maximal physical dose enhancement. Placing eluting implants in planned locations throughout the prostate results in even greater enhancement than using only source or spacer locations. CONCLUSIONS Eluting brachytherapy spacers offer an opportunity to increase EUD during the routine brachytherapy process. Incorporating additional needle placements permits compound eluting spacer placement independent of source placement and thereby allowing a further increase in the therapeutic ratio. Additional work is needed to understand the in vivo spatial distribution of compound around eluters, and to incorporate time dependence of both compound release and radiation dose.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of a cold spot compensation technique using a combination of trans-rectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and computed tomography (CT) for permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy. Material and methods Sixty-five patients were treated with the cold spot compensation technique using TRUS-CT fusion. The prescribed dose was set at 145 Gy. The dose to 90% of prostate volume (D90) was planned to be within 195 Gy (134%) and 205 Gy (141%). After implantation using the conventional technique, additional seeds were implanted if cold spots were detected on TRUS-CT fusion images. Results Cold spots were detected in 32 of 65 patients (49%) and were compensated by additional seeds. Median number of additional seeds was 3 (range, 1-5). A CT scan 1 month later revealed that the percentage of patients receiving an undesirably low D90 (160-180 Gy) was significantly reduced in the examination arm compared to historical controls. However, mean operation time was significantly longer in the examination arm (64 min) than in historical controls (49 min, p < 0.001). With median follow-up of 18 months (range, 9-24 months), no grade 3 or worse toxicity was encountered. Conclusion The cold spot compensation technique using TRUS-CT fusion appears effective for patients receiving permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy.

Purpose The aim of this study was to establish a more reliable method to predict pubic arch interference (PAI) before permanent prostate brachytherapy. Material and methods We retrospectively analyzed the nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results of forty patients with prostate cancer, who were treated with permanent implantation of 125I seeds (permanent brachytherapy). We measured and calculated six parameters based on the MRI results: 1. The prostate volume (PV); 2. The angle of the pubic arch (AoPA); 3. The angle of PAI (AoPAI, pubic symphysis level); 4. The height of PAI (hPAI, pubic symphysis level); 5. The maximum angle of PAI (AoPAIMax); 6. The maximum height of PAI (hPAIMax). We then tested which parameters could accurately predict PAI through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results The results of this study demonstrated that AoPAI, hPAI, hPAIMax, and AoPAIMax could predict PAI. Out of forty cases in our research, 10 cases were with PAI and 30 cases without PAI during the operation. The areas under the ROC curve for PV, AoPA, AoPAI (pubic symphysis level), hPAI (pubic symphysis level), AoPAIMax, and hPAIMax were 0.592, 0.567, 0.957, 0.940, 0.927, and 0.877, respectively. The AoPAI (pubic symphysis level), hPAI (pubic symphysis level), AoPAIMax, and hPAIMax were statistically correlated with PAI. The boundary values were 26.32°, 1.13 cm, 28.37°, and 1.51 cm, respectively. Conclusions This new method derived from MRI has predictive value, as AoPAI, hPAI, hPAIMax, and AoPAIMax could predict PAI. Taking other factors into consideration, we suggest the use of AoPAI as a novel and very reliable predictor of PAI.

Purpose Permanent prostate brachytherapy dosimetry using computed tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (CT-MRI) fusion combines the anatomic detail of MRI with seed localization on CT but requires multimodality imaging acquisition and fusion. The purpose of this study was to compare the utility of MRI only postimplant dosimetry to standard CT-MRI fusion-based dosimetry. Methods and Materials Twenty-three patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy with use of positive contrast MRI markers were included in this study. Dose calculation to the whole prostate, apex, mid-gland, and base was performed via standard CT-MRI fusion and MRI only dosimetry with prostate delineated on the same T2 MRI sequence. The 3-dimensional (3D) distances between seed positions of these two methods were also evaluated. Wilcoxon-matched-pair signed-rank test compared the D90 and V100 of the prostate and its sectors between methods. Results The day 0 D90 and V100 for the prostate were 98% versus 94% and 88% versus 86% for CT-MRI fusion and MRI only dosimetry. There were no differences in the D90 or V100 of the whole prostate, mid-gland, or base between dosimetric methods ( p > 0.19), but prostate apex D90 was high by 13% with MRI dosimetry ( p = 0.034). The average distance between seeds on CT-MRI fusion and MRI alone was 5.5 mm. After additional automated rigid registration of 3D seed positions, the average distance between seeds was 0.3 mm, and the previously observed differences in apex dose between methods was eliminated ( p > 0.11). Conclusions Permanent prostate brachytherapy dosimetry based only on MRI using positive contrast MRI markers is feasible, accurate, and reduces the uncertainties arising from CT-MRI fusion abating the need for postimplant multimodality imaging.

Purpose Pubic arch interference (PAI), when it occurs, is often a limiting factor for patients pursuing brachytherapy treatment of prostate cancer. Pre-brachytherapy pubic arch evaluation is often performed by CT or transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), but MRI has increasingly replaced these modalities for prostate cancer evaluation. The purpose of this study was to determine if staging MRI could be used to evaluate PAI and compare it with these other imaging methods. Methods and Materials Forty-one consecutive patients undergoing brachytherapy evaluation had pelvic MRI-, CT-, and TRUS-based brachytherapy simulation. Pubic arch overlap on T2-weighted MRI and CT was determined by contouring the prostate gland on its largest axial slice and superimposing this contour onto the pubic arch bones. The largest degree of overlap of the prostate gland on MRI and CT was used to predict the existence of PAI as determined by TRUS-based simulation. The correlation between prostate contour overlap was also compared between MRI and CT. Results Nineteen patients (48%) exhibited PAI on TRUS brachytherapy simulation evaluation. The average (±standard error) amount of prostate contour overlap on the pubic arch on CT was 2.9 ± 0.6 mm and on MRI was 2.0 ± 0.6 mm (linear correlation, R, of 0.783, p < 0.001). CT and MRI were equally predictive of PAI on TRUS evaluation (area under the curve = 0.75). Conclusion Pre-brachytherapy pubic arch assessment with diagnostic MRI provides similar predictability of PAI compared with CT, potentially obviating the need for additional pre-brachytherapy CT in the setting of staging MRI.

E Du, Lin Wang, Chang-ying Li, Chang-wen Zhang, Yan-chun Qu, Ran-lu Liu, Yong Xu, Kuo Yang, Zhi-hong Zhang Tianjin Institute of Urology, the 2nd Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China Background: Permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) is an effective treatment choice for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, the impact of PPB on tumor immune status is still poorly understood. This study aimed to assess the immune status in PCa patients before and at different time points after PPB (1, 3, 6, and 12 months). Methods: Blood was collected from 32 patients with low and intermediate risk PCa and 12 healthy volunteers. The frequency of immunocompetent cells was identified by flow cytometry. The concentration of immunoglobulins and complements was detected by ELISA. Results: Various immunocompetent cells were dysregulated in PCa patients compared with healthy volunteers. Peripheral serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decreased rapidly at the first month after PPB treatment, and the peripheral serum PSA became very low at 6 months after PPB treatment. CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD3-CD16+/56+ natural killer (NK) cells were increased significantly at certain time points after PPB. Although the percentage of the CD8+ T cells did not change markedly, the ratio of CD4/CD8 increased significantly at 3 months after PPB (P=0.0196). There was no influence of PPB on B cells number, but the concentration of immunoglobulins IgM, IgG, and IgA, and complements C3 and C4 in patients increased at some time points after PPB. Conclusion: The immunocompetent cells are dysregulated in PCa patients. PPB treatment could effectively kill tumor cells and then stimulate cellular immunity and humoral immunity in PCa patients. Keywords: prostate cancer, iodine-125, permanent prostate brachytherapy, immune status

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the implant quality between intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds (IBCL) and loose seeds (LS) retrospectively. Material and methods: This study included 74 prostate cancer patients who were treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) using IBCL (n = 37) or LS (n = 37) between July 2014 and June 2016. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, seed migration, and operation time were compared between the IBCL and LS groups. In addition to the standard target volume of the whole prostate gland, DVH parameters for prostate plus a 3 mm margin (CTV) were evaluated. Results : In intraoperative planning, prostate V150 was lower (54.8% vs. 59.6%, p = 0.027), and CTV V100 (88.1% vs. 85.6%, p = 0.019) and D90 (98.5% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.0033) were higher in the IBCL group compared with in the LS group. In post-implant dosimetry, prostate V100 (96.9% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.020), CTV V100 (85.6% vs. 81.7%, p = 0.046), and CTV D90 (94.2% vs. 86.5%, p < 0.001) were higher, and prostate V150 (57.1% vs. 64.5%, p = 0.0051) and CTV V150 (31.5% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.046) were lower in the IBCL group compared with in the LS group. Regarding DVH changes between intraoperative planning and post-implant dosimetry, the decrease in prostate D90 was significantly lower in the IBCL group than in the LS group (–1.16% vs. –4.17%, p < 0.001). For the IBCL group, the operation time was slightly but significantly longer than that for the LS group (50.5 minutes vs. 43.7 minutes, p = 0.011). However, the seed migration rate was significantly lower in the IBCL group than in the LS group (5% vs. 41%, p < 0.001). Conclusions : Intraoperatively built custom-linked is more advantageous than LS in terms of dosimetric parameters and migration.

Pulmonary seed emboli to the chest may occur after permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB). The purpose of this study is to analyze factors associated with seed migration to the chest in a large series of PPB patients from a single institution undergoing implant with either loose seeds (LS), mixed loose and stranded seeds (MS), or exclusively stranded seeds in an absorbable vicryl suture (VS).Between May 1998 and July 2015, a total of 1000 consecutive PPB patients with postoperative diagnostic chest x-rays at 4 months after implant were analyzed for seed migration. Patients were grouped based on seed implant technique: LS = 391 (39.1%), MS = 43 (4.3%), or VS = 566 (56.6%). Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models to determine predictors of seed migration.Overall, 18.8% of patients experienced seed migration to the chest. The incidence of seed migration per patient was 45.5%, 11.6%, and 0.9% (p0.0001), for patients receiving LS, MS, or VS PPB, respectively. The right and left lower lobes were the most frequent sites of pulmonary seed migration. On multivariable analysis, planimetry volume (p = 0.0002; HR = 0.7 per 10 cc [0.6-0.8]), number of seeds implanted (p0.0001, HR = 2.4 per 25 seeds [1.7-3.4]), LS implant (p0.0001, HR = 15.9 [5.9-42.1]), and MS implant (p = 0.001, HR = 7.9 [2.3-28.1]) were associated with seed migration to the chest.In this large series, significantly higher rates of seed migration to the chest are observed in implants using any LS with observed hazard ratios of 15.9 and 7.9 for LS and MS respectively, as compared with implants using solely stranded seeds.

Purpose To investigate the treatment results for focal partial salvage re-implantation against local recurrence after permanent prostate brachytherapy. Material and methods Between January 2010 and September 2015, 12 patients were treated with focal partial salvage re-implantation for local recurrence after low-dose-rate brachytherapy using 125I seeds. The focal clinical target volume (F-CTV) was delineated on positive biopsy areas in a mapping biopsy, combining the cold spots on the post-implant dosimetry for initial brachytherapy. The F-CTV was expanded by 3 mm to create the planning target volume (PTV) as a margin to compensate for uncertainties in image registration and treatment delivery. The prescribed dose to the PTV was 145 Gy. The characteristics and biochemical disease-free survival (BdFS) rates were analyzed. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. Results The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at re-implantation was 4.09 ng/ml (range: 2.91-8.24 ng/ml). The median follow-up time was 56 months (range: 6-74 months). The median RD2cc and UD10 were 63 Gy and 159 Gy, respectively. The 4-year BdFS rate was 78%, which included non-responders. Biochemical recurrence occurred in two patients after 7 and 31 months, respectively. The former was treated with hormonal therapy after biochemical failure, and the latter underwent watchful waiting (PSA at the last follow-up of 53 months: 7.3 ng/ml) at the patient's request. No patients had grade 3 GU/GI toxicities or died after salvage re-implantation. Conclusions The partial salvage low-dose-rate brachytherapy used to treat local recurrence after permanent prostate brachytherapy is well-tolerated, with high biochemical response rates. This treatment can be not only a method to delay chemical castration but also a curative treatment option in cases of local recurrence of prostate carcinoma after seed implantation.

Iodine-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) was introduced in Japan in 2003. The Japanese guidelines of radiation safety control for PPB regulate radiation safety parameters including the qualifications of the institutions and doctors to perform this treatment. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of PPB for localized prostate cancer, the nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) was conducted between 2005 and 2010. The J-POPS study is the largest multi-institutional prospective cohort study to achieve state-of-the-art clinical outcomes for localized prostate cancer treated using PPB. This study, along with regular training courses and joint radiation oncology-urology conferences, has promoted and achieves quality PPB. Every year, 3000 patients are treated with this modality in Japan. In this article, the early results of J-POPS and many clinical investigations are reviewed to provide the current status of PPB as practiced in Japan. This review covers planning techniques, postimplant dosimetry, toxicity, clinical outcomes, and special issues of radiation safety control.

To evaluate the permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) learning curve using postimplant multisector dosimetric analysis and to assess the correlation between sector -specific dosimetry and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).First 200 patients treated with (125)I PPB monotherapy (145 Gy) at a single institution were assessed. Postimplant dosimetry (PID) using CT was evaluated for whole prostate (global) and 12 sectors, assessing minimum dose to 90% of prostate (D90) and dose to 0.1 cm(3) of rectum (D0.1cc). Global and sector PID results were evaluated to investigate changes in D90 with case number. Urinary and bowel PROMs were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire. The correlation between global and individual sector PID and urinary/bowel PROMs was also evaluated.Linear regression confirmed a significant improvement in global D90 with case number (r(2) = 0.20; p = 0.001) at a rate of 0.11 Gy/case. Postimplant D90 of base sectors increased at a rate of 0.11-0.15 Gy/case (p = 0.0001) and matched global improvement. The regression lines of midgland and apex sectors were significantly different from global D90 (p = 0.01). Posterior midgland sectors showed a significant reduction in D90 with case number at a rate of 0.13-0.19 Gy/case (p = 0.01). Dose to posterior midgland sectors correlated with rectal D0.1cc dose but not bowel PROMs. Dose to posterior midgland sectors correlated with urinary International Prostate Symptom Score change, which was not apparent when global D90 alone was considered.Sector analysis provided increased spatial information regarding the PPB learning curve. Furthermore, sector analysis correlated with urinary PROMs and rectal dose.

Prostate brachytherapy sometimes requires the volume receiving150% of the prescribed dose (V150) to be50% to obtain satisfactory coverage. There has been concern expressed that high V150 may be associated with higher rates of urinary retention and morbidity.We reviewed 207 consecutive cases of prostate brachytherapy treated with palladium 103 ((103)Pd; n = 140) or iodine 125 ((125)I; n = 67). Prescribed doses for (103)Pd monotherapy and boost were 124 and 90 Gy, respectively; for (125)I, the corresponding doses were 160 and 120 Gy. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and every 6 months thereafter.Median follow-up at the time of analysis was 18 months. For (103)Pd, the mean intraoperative volume and V150 were 30.3 cm(3) and 72%, respectively; corresponding values for (125)I were 38.3 cm(3) and 59%, respectively. Two of the patients treated with iodine and 9 treated with palladium experienced acute urinary retention, which was not statistically significant (P = .48). The rectal V100 for (103)Pd was significantly less than that for (125)I (P.001). The mean baseline, 1-month, and 12-month American Urologic Association (AUA) scores for (103)Pd were 8.5, 19.7, and 8.2, respectively; for (125)I, the values were 7.4, 17.1, and 13.4, respectively. At 12 months, the AUA scores returned to baseline in the (103)Pd-treated patients, whereas scores in (125)I-treated patients remained elevated (P = .005). High V150 did not appear to cause undue risk of urinary retention or morbidity based on logistic regression analysis of patients treated with monotherapy performed with either isotope.The risk of urinary retention was low, despite high V150 values for both isotopes. In patients treated with brachytherapy alone, no significant increase in urinary morbidity was seen in relation to V150. AUA scores returned to baseline in (103)Pd-treated patients at 1 year, whereas (125)I-treated patients demonstrated continued elevation.

To compare target volume coverage and critical organ dosimetry of intraoperative treatment plans for loose seed (LS) and stranded seed (SS) (125)I permanent implants for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.Two hundred and five patients who underwent permanent seed brachytherapy were included in the study. For prostate dosimetry V90, V100, V150, V200, D90 and COIN were used. The dose to urethra and rectum was determined by the maximal dose and relative doses that cover specified volumes. Means and standard deviations were calculated and statistically compared.On average, 54 (range, 30-78) and 48 (range, 31-67) seeds were implanted in the prostate with individual median activities of 0.62 U (range, 0.52-0.70 U) and 0.71 U (range, 0.65-0.71 U) for LS and SS technique, respectively. The target coverage was slightly better with SS (V100: 98% vs. 96%,p 0.05; D90: 172 Gy vs. 166 Gy, p 0.05), but more conformal dose distributions were observed with LS (COIN: 0.70 vs. 0.63, p 0.05). The dose homogeneity did not differ significantly between the two groups. Regarding the dose to urethra and rectum all dose parameters were significantly lower with LS.LS resulted in less dose to the urethra and rectum compared to SS in intraoperative dosimetry. A slightly better target volume coverage with decreased conformity of dose distribution is reported with SS. More studies are necessary to determine how these results will affect postoperative dosimetry, and ultimately, clinical outcome.

Tungsten functional paper (TFP) is a paper-based radiation-shielding material, which is lead-free and easy to cut. We developed a radiation protection undergarment using TFP for prostate cancer patients treated with permanent 125I seed implantation (PSI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the shielding ability of the undergarment with respect to household contacts and members of the public. Between October 2016 and April 2017, a total of 10 prostate cancer patients treated with PSI were enrolled in this prospective study. The external radiation exposure from each patient 1 day after PSI was measured with and without the undergarment. Measurements were performed using a survey meter at 100 cm from the surface of the patient’s body. The exposure rates were measured from five directions: anterior, anteriorly oblique, lateral, posteriorly oblique, and posterior. The measured radiation exposure rates without the undergarment, expressed as mean ± standard deviation, from the anterior, anteriorly oblique, lateral, posteriorly oblique, and posterior directions were 1.28 ± 0.43 μSv/h, 0.70 ± 0.34 μSv/h, 0.21 ± 0.062 μSv/h, 0.65 ± 0.33 μSv/h and 1.24 ± 0.41 μSv/h, respectively. The undergarment was found to have (mean ± standard deviation) shielding abilities of 88.7 ± 5.8%, 44.0 ± 42.1%, 50.6 ± 15.9%, 72.9 ± 27.0% and 90.4 ± 10.7% from the anterior, anteriorly oblique, lateral, posteriorly oblique, and posterior directions, respectively. In conclusion, this shielding undergarment is a useful device that has the potential to reduce radiation exposure for the general public and the patient’s family.

Objective : Permanent prostate brachytherapy is an effective and popular treatment modality for prostate cancer in which long needles are inserted into the prostate. Challenges associated with manual needle insertion such as needle deflection limit this procedure to primarily treat the entire prostate gland even for patients with localized cancer. In this paper, we present a new semiautomated hand-held needle steering assistant designed to help surgeons improve needle placement accuracy. Methods : Regular clinical brachytherapy needles are connected to a compact device that the surgeon holds. As the surgeon inserts the needle, the device rotates the needle base on a measured and calculated basis in order to produce a desired trajectory of the needle tip. A novel needle–tissue interaction model and a steering algorithm calculate such control actions based on ultrasound images of the needle in tissue. The assistant can also apply controlled longitudinal microvibrations to the needle that reduce needle–tissue friction. Results : Experimental validation of the proposed system in phantom and ex-vivo biological tissue report an average needle targeting accuracy of 0.33 mm over 72 needle insertions in 12 different experimental scenarios. Conclusion : We introduce a new framework for needle steering in prostate brachytherapy in which the surgeon remains in charge of the needle insertion. The device weighs 160 g, making it easy to incorporate with current insertion techniques. Significance : Expected benefits of the proposed system include more precise needle targeting accuracy, which can result in improved focal treatment of prostate cancer.

Purpose An MR-only postimplant dosimetry workflow for low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy could reduce patient burden, improve accuracy, and improve cost efficiency. However, localization of brachytherapy seeds on MRI scans remains a major challenge for this type of workflow. In this study, we propose and validate an MR-only seed localization method, and identify remaining challenges. Methods and Materials The localization method was based on template matching of simulations of complex-valued imaging artifacts around metal brachytherapy seeds. The method was applied to MRI scans of 25 prostate cancer patients who underwent LDR brachytherapy and for whom postimplant dosimetry was performed after four weeks. The seed locations found with the MR-only method were validated against the seed locations found on CT. The circumstances in which detection errors were made were classified to gain an insight in the nature of the errors. Results A total of 1490 out of 1557 (96%) seeds were correctly detected, while 67 false positive errors were made. The correctly detected seed locations had a high spatial accuracy with an average error of 0.8 mm compared with CT. A majority of the false positives occurred near other seeds. Most false negatives were found in either stranded configurations without spacers or near other seeds. Conclusions The low detection error rate and high localization accuracy obtained by the complex-valued template matching approach are promising for future clinical application of MR-only dosimetry. The most important remaining challenge is robustness with regard to configurations of multiple seeds in close vicinity, such as in strands of seeds without spacers. This issue could potentially be resolved by simulating specific configurations of multiple seeds, or by constraining the treatment planning to avoid these configurations, which could make the proposed method competitive with CT-based seed localization. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Purpose The aim of this study was to analyze the dosimetric influence of conventional spacers and a cobalt chloride complex contrast (C4) agent, a novel marker for MRI that can also serve as a seed spacer, adjacent to 103 Pd, 125 I, and 131 Cs sources for permanent prostate brachytherapy. Methods and Materials Monte Carlo methods for radiation transport were used to estimate the dosimetric influence of brachytherapy end-weld thicknesses and spacers near the three sources. Single-source assessments and volumetric conditions simulating prior patient treatments were computed. Volume–dose distributions were imported to a treatment planning system for dose–volume histogram analyses. Results Single-source assessment revealed that brachytherapy spacers primarily attenuated the dose distribution along the source long axis. The magnitude of the attenuation at 1 cm on the long axis ranged from −10% to −5% for conventional spacers and approximately −2% for C4 spacers, with the largest attenuation for 103 Pd. Spacer perturbation of dose distributions was less than manufacturing tolerances for brachytherapy sources as gleaned by an analysis of end-weld thicknesses. Volumetric Monte Carlo assessment demonstrated that TG-43 techniques overestimated calculated doses by approximately 2%. Specific dose–volume histogram metrics for prostate implants were not perturbed by inclusion of conventional or C4 spacers in clinical models. Conclusions Dosimetric perturbations of single-seed dose distributions by brachytherapy spacers exceeded 10% along the source long axes adjacent to the spacers. However, no dosimetric impact on volumetric parameters was noted for brachytherapy spacers adjacent to 103 Pd, 125 I, or 131 Cs sources in the context of permanent prostate brachytherapy implants.

Permanent prostate brachytherapy has been practiced for more than a century. This review examines the influence of earlier procedures on the modern transperineal ultrasound-directed technique. A literature review was conducted to examine the origin of current clinical practice. The dimensions of the modern brachytherapy seed, the prescription dose, and implant/teletherapy sequencing are vestigial features, which may be suboptimal in the current era of low-energy photon-emitting radionuclides and computerized dose calculations. Although the modern transperineal permanent prostate implant procedure has proven to be safe and effective, it should undergo continuous re-evaluation and evolution to ensure that its potential is maximized.

Purpose To evaluate a sector analysis program in the assessment and comparison of pre- and post-implant dosimetric parameters during the development of an 125 I permanent prostate brachytherapy service. Methods and Materials A total of 50 consecutive men being treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy had dose–volume analysis in 12 sectors of their pre-implant ultrasound (US pre ) and post-implant CT (CT post ) studies. Individual sectors were created by dividing prostate into three equal lengths, namely base, midgland, and apex. Each of these volumes was then divided into four axial sectors. Dosimetric parameters were compared in adjoining sectors within each study and between studies. Results There were statistically significant differences between individual sectors on US pre and CT post volumes with CT post higher than US pre ( p = 0.001). Statistically significant differences were found in corresponding sectors on US pre and CT post for all dosimetric parameters. The dosimetric parameters were significantly lower on CT post in the anterior base and midgland ( p = 0.001) and significantly higher at the posterior apex and midgland ( p = 0.05). Dose homogeneity was demonstrated in adjoining sectors in all US pre and most adjoining sectors on CT post . Conclusions Sector analysis allows rapid assessment of US pre and CT post dosimetry. It offers a scientific method of identifying areas of increased and reduced dosing on CT post when compared with US pre, providing a learning tool to refine dosimetric analysis and highlight sectors where implant quality could be improved.

Purpose: Periprostatic brachytherapy doses impact biochemical control. In this study, we evaluate extracapsular volumetric dosimetry following permanent prostate brachytherapy in patients entered in a multi-institutional community database. Material and methods: In the database, 4547 patients underwent brachytherapy (3094 ‐ 125 I, 1437 ‐ 103 Pd and 16 ‐ 131 Cs). Using the originally determined prostate volume, a 5 mm, 3-dimensional peri-prostatic anulus was constructed around the prostate (except for a 2 mm posterior margin), and evaluated in its entirety and in 90° segments. Prostate dosimetric parameters consisted of a V100 and D 90 while the annular dosimetry was reported as a V100 . Results: The intraprostatic V 100 and D 90 for 103 Pd, and 125 I were statistically comparable when stratified by isotope and/or monotherapy vs. boost. The overall mean V 100 for the periprostatic annulus was 62.8%. The mean V 100 at the base (51.6%) was substantially less than the apex (73.5%) and midgland (65.9%). In addition, for all patients, the anterior V 100 (45.7%) was less than the lateral (68.8%) and the posterior (75.0%). The geometric V 100 annular differences were consis tent when evaluated by isotope. Overall, the V 100 was higher in the 125 I cohort. Conclusions: The optimal extracapsular brachytherapy dose and radial extent remains unknown, but will prove in creasingly important with reductions and/or elimination of supplemental external beam radiation therapy. The large multi-institutional community database demonstrates periprostatic annular doses that are not as robust as those in se lected high volume brachytherapy centers, and may be inadequate for optimal biochemical control following monother apeutic brachytherapy, especially in higher risk patients. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2013; 5, 3: 117‐121 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2013.37941

The study is designed to investigate the effect of edema on the delivered dose, tumor cell surviving fraction (SF), and tumor control probability (TCP) in the patients of prostate cancer who underwent (131)Cs permanent seed implantation. The dose reduction, the SF, and the TCP for edematous prostate implants were calculated for 31 patients who underwent real-time (131)Cs permanent seed implantation for edema half-lives (EHL), ranging from 4 days to 34 days and for edema magnitudes (M0) varying from 5% to 60% of the actual prostate volume. A dose reduction in (131)Cs implants varied from 1.1% (for EHL = 4 days and M(0) = 5%) to 32.3% (for EHL = 34 days and M(0) = 60%). These are higher than the dose reduction in 125I implants, which vary from 0.3% (for EHL = 4 days and M(0) = 5%) to 17.5% (for EHL = 34 days and M(0) = 60%). As EHL increased from 4 days to 34 days and edema magnitude increased from 5% to 60%, the natural logarithmic value of SF increased by 4.57 and the TCP decreased by 0.80. Edema induced increase in the SF and decrease in the TCP in (131)Cs seed implants, is significantly more pronounced in a combination of higher edema magnitude and larger edema half-lives than for less edema magnitude and lower edema half-lives, as compared for M(0) = 60% and EHL = 34, and M(0) = 5% and EHL = 4 days.

Permanent prostate brachytherapy is frequently performed worldwide, and many studies have demonstrated its favorable outcomes. Implant seeds used in this procedure contain a precise amount of radionuclide and are completely sealed. Because these seeds are not manufactured in Japan, they are expensive (6300 yen per seed) and therefore need careful management as a radioisotope. The proper implantation technique requires considerable procedure time, good dosimetric outcomes and simple radioactive isotope management. To evaluate the modified hybrid interactive technique based on these considerations, we assessed 313 patients who underwent hybrid interactive brachytherapy without additional external beam radiotherapy. We evaluated the duration of the procedure, dosimetric factors and the total number of excess seeds. The dosimetric results from computed tomography on Day 30 of follow-up were: 172 Gy (range 130–194 Gy) for pD90, 97.8% (83.5–100%) for pV100, 54.6% (27.5–82.4%) for pV150, 164 Gy (120–220 Gy) for uD90, 194 Gy (126–245 Gy) for uD30, 210 Gy (156–290 Gy) for uD5, 0.02 ml (0–1.2 ml) for rV100 and 0 ml (0–0.2 ml) for rV150. The number of excess seeds was determined by subtracting the number of implanted seeds from the expected number of seeds calculated from previously proposed nomograms. As per our method, nine excess seeds were used for two patients, whereas using the nomograms, the number of excess seeds was approximately eight per patient. Our modified hybrid interactive technique reduced the number of excess seeds while maintaining treatment quality.

Purpose The 125I source currently used for prostate brachytherapy at St. James’s Institute of Oncology is a standard size seed (≈4.5 mm in length and 0.8 mm in diameter). A new, thinner seed is under evaluation. This is designed to be implanted using narrower needles, potentially reducing edema and improving the dose distribution. This study investigated the visibility of the thinner source on multimodality images and compared it with that of standard size seeds. Methods and Materials Images of dummy seeds of both thinner and standard size models were taken using ultrasound, fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The ultrasound, fluoroscopy, and CT images were acquired with the seeds inserted into phantoms positioned in a water tank. The MR images were acquired using phantoms containing single seeds. The images were analyzed visually and quantitatively. The resolution of closely spaced seeds on CT images was investigated. Results The visibility of both seeds was similar on ultrasound, fluoroscopy, and MR images. On CT images, the thinner seeds give reduced artifacts and better resolution. Conclusions The use of the thinner seed would have minimal effect on ultrasound and fluoroscopy imaging during treatment. However on CT images, the use of the thinner seeds may improve seed identification for post-treatment dosimetry. Further study is required into the suitability of MR images alone for post-treatment dosimetry.

Purpose: To investigate whether a longer sagittal view and less movement using a dual sagittal crystal probe (DSCP) for trans rectal ultra sound (TRUS) allow for more accurate online-planning in I-125 permanent implant brachytherapy of the prostate, compared to a single sagittal crystal probe (SSCP). Material and methods: Between March 2008 and March 2010, 50 patients with prostate cancer were consecutively included in the study. The first 25 of these patients had both their pre- and online-planning based on a single sagittal crystal probe (SSCP). The treatment-plans of the other 25 patients were based on a DSCP TRUS. Three weeks after implantation a post-planning was made based on CT. TRUS online and CT post-plan dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, D90 and V100, were compared for both groups. Also, the post-plan DVH parameters of SSCP were compared to DSCP. The possible factors that might influence the post-plan D90 and V100 were analysed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Results: SSCP and DSCP online mean D90 and V100 were significantly larger than post-plan mean D90 and V100 (P < 0.01). The post-plan mean D90 and mean V100 were both non-significantly larger for SSCP based post-plans compared to DSCP based post plans (P = 0.76 and P = 0.68). ANOVA showed significant impact of prostate volume on the post-plan D90 and V100. Conclusions: The advantages of the dual sagittal crystal probe did not lead to more accurate online planning by investigating DVH-parameters. The only factor found to have influence on the DVH-parameters was the prostate volume.

PurposeThe Nuclear Regulatory Commission deems it to be a medical event (ME) if the total dose delivered differs from the prescribed dose by 20% or more. A dose-based definition of ME is not appropriate for permanent prostate brachytherapy as it generates too many spurious MEs and thereby creates unnecessary apprehension in patients, and ties up regulatory bodies and the licensees in unnecessary and burdensome investigations. A more suitable definition of ME is required for permanent prostate brachytherapy.Methods and MaterialsThe American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) formed a working group of experienced clinicians to review the literature, assess the validity of current regulations, and make specific recommendations about the definition of an ME in permanent prostate brachytherapy.ResultsThe working group found that the current definition of ME in §35.3045 as “the total dose delivered differs from the prescribed dose by 20 percent or more” was not suitable for permanent prostate brachytherapy since the prostate volume (and hence the resultant calculated prostate dose) is dependent on the timing of the imaging, the imaging modality used, the observer variability in prostate contouring, the planning margins used, inadequacies of brachytherapy treatment planning systems to calculate tissue doses, and seed migration within and outside the prostate. If a dose-based definition for permanent implants is applied strictly, many properly executed implants would be improperly classified as an ME leading to a detrimental effect on brachytherapy. The working group found that a source strength-based criterion, of >20% of source strength prescribed in the post-procedure written directive being implanted outside the planning target volume is more appropriate for defining ME in permanent prostate brachytherapy.ConclusionsASTRO recommends that the definition of ME for permanent prostate brachytherapy should not be dose based but should be based upon the source strength (air-kerma strength) administered.