Search

The available evidence suggests positive health outcomes associated with early treatment intensification in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Our study estimated the productivity effects arising from improved health correlated with early intensified treatment in T2DM in Korea. Using a recently published methodology and model, we investigated the association between early intensified treatment and the probability of experiencing fewer diabetes-related complication events. Treatment strategies leading to better health outcomes are expected to be associated with social value through increased participation in paid and unpaid work activities. Therefore, we translated the lower incidence of complications into monetary terms related to productivity for the Korean population. We quantified productivity by considering (a) absenteeism, (b) presenteeism, (c) permanent loss of labor force, and (d) activity restriction. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses in the base case parameter were performed. Approximately, 1.7 thousand (standard deviation [SD] ±580 events) micro- and macrovascular complication events could potentially be avoided by early treatment intensification. This led to a societal gain attributed to increased productivity of 23 million USD (SD ± $8.2 million). This article demonstrates the likelihood of achieving better health and productivity through early intensified treatment in diabetes.

Background: In an increasingly competitive business world, businesses need to be able to measure the effectiveness of their supply chain management process practices against proven best practice frameworks. A number of these frameworks exist internationally but have to be used within the context of knowing the relative strengths and weaknesses of potential benchmarking frameworks. Two such frameworks were identified in the research and a case was made to use one such framework, the Global Supply Chain Forum (GSCF) framework, to measure the effectiveness of the supply chain practices of a leading confectionery manufacturing company in South Africa. Objective of the research: The purpose of the research was to identify an international best practice framework, which could be used by South African manufacturing organisations to benchmark their supply chain management (SCM) practices. Methodology: The methodology followed was a literature review of the existing SCM frameworks to identify a framework, which would be the most suited to the objective of the study, followed by a case study of a leading manufacturing organisation’s SCM practices benchmarked against those found in the framework. Results and conclusions: The main finding of the case study was that there is a high degree of adherence between the case study organisation’s SCM practices and those found in the SCM framework. There was also generally a high level of importance ascribed by respondents to the best practices contained by the GSCF framework. It was therefore concluded that the GSCF framework proved to be a useful instrument for a comprehensive analysis of supply chain management processes and practices for a manufacturer in the fast moving consumer goods industry, with potential for applications by organisations in the supply chains of other industries.

This article evaluates the statement that companies may increase efficiencies and profitability by segmenting their customer base in terms of importance, for the purpose of providing specialised services. We specifically refer to how customer segmentation compares to basic service as proposed by Bowersox and Closs and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the basic service approach as well as the factors which have contributed to its success. We also discuss the background and current state of the customer service environment and provide an opinion of which approach to customer service is preferable.

Background: In an increasingly competitive business world, businesses need to be able to measure the effectiveness of their supply chain management process practices against proven best practice frameworks. A number of these frameworks exist internationally but have to be used within the context of knowing the relative strengths and weaknesses of potential benchmarking frameworks. Two such frameworks were identified in the research and a case was made to use one such framework, the Global Supply Chain Forum (GSCF) framework, to measure the effectiveness of the supply chain practices of a leading confectionery manufacturing company in South Africa. Objective of the research: The purpose of the research was to identify an international best practice framework, which could be used by South African manufacturing organisations to benchmark their supply chain management (SCM) practices. Methodology: The methodology followed was a literature review of the existing SCM frameworks to identify a framework, which would be the most suited to the objective of the study, followed by a case study of a leading manufacturing organisation's SCM practices benchmarked against those found in the framework. Results and conclusions: The main finding of the case study was that there is a high degree of adherence between the case study organisation's SCM practices and those found in the SCM framework. There was also generally a high level of importance ascribed by respondents to the best practices contained by the GSCF framework. It was therefore concluded that the GSCF framework proved to be a useful instrument for a comprehensive analysis of supply chain management processes and practices for a manufacturer in the fast moving consumer goods industry, with potential for applications by organisations in the supply chains of other industries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Following on from the 2015 Lancet Oncology Commission on expanding global access to radiotherapy, Radiotherapy and theranostics: a Lancet Oncology Commission was created to assess the access and availability of radiotherapy to date and to address the important issue of access to the promising field of theranostics at a global level. A marked disparity in the availability of radiotherapy machines between high-income countries and low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been identified previously and remains a major problem. The availability of a suitably trained and credentialled workforce has also been highlighted as a major limiting factor to effective implementation of radiotherapy, particularly in LMICs. We investigated initiatives that could mitigate these issues in radiotherapy, such as extended treatment hours, hypofractionation protocols, and new technologies. The broad implementation of hypofractionation techniques compared with conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer and breast cancer was projected to provide radiotherapy for an additional 2·2 million patients (0·8 million patients with prostate cancer and 1·4 million patients with breast cancer) with existing resources, highlighting the importance of implementing new technologies in LMICs. A global survey undertaken for this Commission revealed that use of radiopharmaceutical therapy-other than 131 I-was highly variable in high-income countries and LMICs, with supply chains, workforces, and regulatory issues affecting access and availability. The capacity for radioisotope production was highlighted as a key issue, and training and credentialling of health professionals involved in theranostics is required to ensure equitable access and availability for patient treatment. New initiatives-such as the International Atomic Energy Agency's Rays of Hope programme-and interest by international development banks in investing in radiotherapy should be supported by health-care systems and governments, and extended to accelerate the momentum generated by recognising global disparities in access to radiotherapy. In this Commission, we propose actions and investments that could enhance access to radiotherapy and theranostics worldwide, particularly in LMICs, to realise health and economic benefits and reduce the burden of cancer by accessing these treatments., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests HH serves (unpaid) on an external advisory board of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, on the International Advisory Board of the University of Vienna, on the Scientific Committee of the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), on the Board of Trustees of the DKFZ, and on the advisory board of The Lancet Oncology; is remunerated for serving on the Board of Directors of Ion Beam Applications; receives stock options for serving on the Board of Directors of iCAD; and reports research funding to their institution (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Center Support Grant/Core Grant P30 CA008748) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)–National Cancer Institute (NCI). AA reports funding to their institution from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and the NIH. GB reports research funding to their institution from the Science and Technology Facilities Council UK and reports travel support from International Council Expert Corps. MD reports research funding to their institution from Science and Technology Facilities Council UK and reports travel support from International Council Expert Corps. TE reports honoraria from the University of Washington and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) and reports receiving travel support to attend meetings from JASTRO, the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). SGr reports receiving grants from the NCI; reports consulting fees from Lumonus and the Sustainable Dialogue on Peaceful Uses; and has stock options in Harbinger Health. KH reports research funding to their institution from Novartis and Sofie Biosciences; reports consulting fees from Advanced Accelerator Applications, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bain Capital, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Convergent, Curiun, Debiopharm, EcoR1, Fusion, GE Healthcare, Immedica, Isotopen Technologien Munchen, Janssen, Merck, Molecular Partners, Nvision, POINT Biopharma, Pfizer, Radiopharm Theranostics, Telix, Theragnostics, and Ymabs; reports honoraria for lectures from PeerVoice; serves on paid advisory boards for Fusion and GE Healthcare; reports travel support from Janssen; and has stock options from Sofie Biosciences, Pharma15, Nvision, Convergent, Aktis Oncology, and AdvanCell. MSH reports research funding to their institution from the Prostate Cancer Foundation, the US Department of Defence, Movember, and the Peter MacCallum Foundation; reports clinical trial funding to their institution from Bayer and Isotopia; reports clinical trial support to their institution from the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation; reports consulting fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Novartis; reports speaker fees from Janssen and AstraZeneca; reports fees to their institution for serving on the advisory board on Novartis; reports unremunerated participation in the Scientific Committee at the Australian Friends of Sheba; and is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator grant. DJ reports royalties from Elekta Oncology System, Precision X-ray System, and Modus Medical; reports license of technology to iRT; reports board membership on Break Through Cancer; reports being an advisor to ACS BrightEdge; and is a founder and stockholder in Nanovista. JK reports participation on a data safety monitoring board and advisory board from Novartis (personal fees) and reports lecture honoraria from Monrol. JSL reports research support from Clarity Pharmaceuticals and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals; has acted as an adviser of Alpha-9 Theranostics, Clarity Pharmaceuticals, Earli, Evergreen Theragnostics, Suba Therapeutics, Inhibrx, Precirix, Solve, Goldman Sachs, TPG Capital, Curie Therapeutics, NextTech Invest, and Telix Pharmaceuticals; is secretary/treasurer of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI); holds equity in Curie Therapeutics, Summit Biomedical Imaging, Telix Pharmaceuticals, and Evergreen Theragnostics; and is supported by NIH R35 CA232130. YL reports funding to their institution for the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) Chair on Health Economics in Radiation Oncology (HERO)–Value-Based Radiation Oncology, for a proton beam project from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)–Applied Biomedical Research with a Primary Finality, and for the ARCHERY trial; reports unpaid positions on advisory boards for the HALT trial and PROSECCA trial; is a member of the ESTRO Scientific Council and the Belgian Board of Oncology; is co-chair of the ESTRO-HERO project; and is principal investigator of the E2-Radiate trial, a joint project of ESTRO, and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). JRP reports being an unpaid chair of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) International Council. AAR received consulting fees from Novartis; received honoraria for lectures from the European Society for Medical Oncology, Sociedade Brasileira de Mastologia, and Instituto Oncoclinicas; received financial support for attending meetings from ASTRO, Congresso Gramado, and Congresso Oncolinicas; reports an unpaid leadership position at the Sociedade Brasileira de Radioterapia; and has stock and stock options in Grupo Oncoclinicas. MMS reports research funding to their institution from Aktis, Point Biopharma, and Telix Pharmaceuticals; reports speaker honoraria from Novartis, Ion Beam Applications, and Johnson and Johnson; and holds positions in the Africa Health Research Institute and Adcock. VV holds positions as editor of the Journal of Clinical Oncology/Global Oncology and Translational Oncology and is a member of the board for City Cancer Challenge. RLW reports research funding to their institution from Siemens Healthineers, White Rabbit AI, Fusion, Perspective Therapeutics, Rayze, and Bayer; provides consulting services to Voximetry, Molecular Targeting Technologies (MTT), Perspective, Siemens, Abdera, and Seno; reports speaker payment from Hamad Health Qatar; reports travel support from Rayze and Hamad Health Qatar; has stock options in Voximetry and MTT; is a stockholder in Clarity Pharmaceuticals; participates on advisory boards for Perspective and Fusion; is a member of the SNMMI Mars Shot Board; and was a past president of SNMMI. JSY reports funding to their institution from the NIH, the IVY Foundation, and the Falk Research Medical Trust; reports honoraria from the University of Maryland and the Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center; and holds an unpaid position in the Clinical Advisory Council at the American Brain Tumor Association. AMS reports trial funding to their institution from EMD Serono, ITM, Telix Pharmaceuticals, AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, Fusion Pharmaceuticals, and Cyclotek; reports research funding to their institution from Medimmune, Antengene, Humanigen, and Telix Pharmaceuticals; is on advisory boards of Imagion and ImmunOs; reports unpaid board membership of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine and the World Federation of Nuclear Medicine and Biology; and is supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (number 1177837). All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

The available evidence suggests positive health outcomes associated with early treatment intensification in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Our study estimated the productivity effects arising from improved health correlated with early intensified treatment in T2DM in Korea. Using a recently published methodology and model, we investigated the association between early intensified treatment and the probability of experiencing fewer diabetes-related complication events. Treatment strategies leading to better health outcomes are expected to be associated with social value through increased participation in paid and unpaid work activities. Therefore, we translated the lower incidence of complications into monetary terms related to productivity for the Korean population. We quantified productivity by considering (a) absenteeism, (b) presenteeism, (c) permanent loss of labor force, and (d) activity restriction. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses in the base case parameter were performed. Approximately, 1.7 thousand (standard deviation [SD] ±580 events) micro- and macrovascular complication events could potentially be avoided by early treatment intensification. This led to a societal gain attributed to increased productivity of 23 million USD (SD ± $8.2 million). This article demonstrates the likelihood of achieving better health and productivity through early intensified treatment in diabetes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: F. Tsotra, P. Peristeris, I. Athanasiou, M. Müller are employees of WifOR institute. G. Bader, A. Malhotra are employees of Novartis.

Objectives: As first-in-class cholesterol-lowering small interfering ribonucleic acid, inclisiran provides effective reductions in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol to achieve better cardiovascular (CV) health. We estimate the health and socioeconomic effects of introducing inclisiran according to a population health agreement in England., Methods: Building on the inclisiran cost-effectiveness model, a Markov model simulates health gains in terms of avoided CV events and CV deaths because of add-on inclisiran treatment for patients aged 50 years and older with pre-existing atherosclerotic CV disease. These are translated into socioeconomic effects, defined as societal impact. To that end, we quantify avoided productivity losses in terms of paid and unpaid work productivity and monetize them according to gross value added. Furthermore, we calculate value chain effects for paid work activities, drawing on value-added multipliers based on input-output tables. The derived value-invest ratio compares avoided productivity losses against the increased healthcare costs., Results: Our results show that 138 647 CV events could be avoided over a period of 10 years. The resulting societal impact amounts to £8.17 billion, whereas additional healthcare costs are estimated at £7.94 billion. This translates into a value-invest ratio of 1.03., Conclusions: Our estimates demonstrate the potential health and socioeconomic value of inclisiran. Thereby, we highlight the importance to treat CVD and illustrate the impact that a large-scale intervention can have on population health and the economy., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The anthracycline antibiotics, daunorubicin, doxorubicin, and epirubicin, which are widely used for treatment of malignancies, have been evaluated for their effect on angiogenesis in relation to the inhibition of collagenase type IV reported previously. In the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) system of angiogenesis, anthracyclines inhibited vascular density at doses of 5-20 micrograms/disc as well as collagenous protein biosynthesis, which is a reliable index of angiogenesis. Similarly, all three anthracyclines inhibited tube formation in the in vitro system of angiogenesis using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) plated on Matrigel. The inhibition was dose-dependent and caused 50% inhibition at concentrations of 2.5-15 micrograms/mL. At concentrations of anthracyclines which prevented tube formation and angiogenesis, there were no cytotoxic effects, as evidenced by methylene blue uptake, and the growth of these endothelial cells was not inhibited. The experimental antitumor agent titanocene dichloride inhibited collagenase type IV from Walker 256 carcinosarcoma with IC50 approximately 0.2 mM. Titanocene also prevented angiogenesis in the CAM and tube formation by HUVECs on Matrigel at concentrations that were without effect on growth or cytotoxicity of endothelial cells or Walker 256 cells in culture. The antiangiogenic effect of the aforementioned antitumor agents at therapeutically attainable concentrations may explain, at least in part, their antitumor properties because angiogenesis is an essential process for tumor growth and metastasis. The antiangiogenic effect is, however, unrelated to metalloproteinase inhibition because higher concentrations are required for that effect than for inhibition of angiogenesis.

TNF is a major mediator in the pathogenesis of endotoxic shock, and its inhibition has a protective effect in various animal models of sepsis or endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) toxicity. LPS treatment also induces an oxidative damage mediated by increased production of reactive oxygen intermediates. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is an antioxidant and a precursor of the synthesis of glutathione (GSH) and was reported to protect against LPS toxicity and LPS-induced pulmonary edema. In this study we investigated the effect of NAC on TNF production and LPS lethality in mice. The results indicated that oral administration of NAC protects against LPS toxicity and inhibits the increase in serum TNF levels in LPS-treated mice. The inhibition was not confined to the released form of TNF, since NAC also inhibited LPS-induced spleen-associated TNF. On the other hand, the inhibitor of GSH synthesis, DL-buthionine-(SR)-sulfoximine (BSO), had the opposite effect of potentiating LPS-induced TNF production, and this was associated with a decrease in liver GSH levels. Repletion of liver GSH with NAC reversed this effect. NAC was also active in inhibiting TNF production and hepatotoxicity in mice treated with LPS in association with a sensitizing dose of Actinomycin D. These data indicate that GSH can be an endogenous modulator of TNF production in vivo. On the other hand, NAC pretreatment did not inhibit other effects of LPS, particularly induction of serum IL-6, spleen IL-1 alpha, and corticosterone, in the same experimental model, suggesting that the observed effect could be specific for TNF.

A major human acute phase protein, the serum amyloid A protein, has been tested in vitro for its effect on lymphocyte proliferation, the formation of E-stable rosettes, as well as the growth of HeLa and MRC5 cell cultures. Serum amyloid A protein has been found to be markedly inhibitory at 30, 100, 200, and 300 micrograms/mL, and is a very potent inhibitor of in vitro biological functions.