Search

Scar endometriosis is increasingly being reported with the increase in surgeries particularly cesarean sections. Episiotomy scars, resulting from surgical incisions made during childbirth, are uncommon sites for endometriosis. This case report presents a unique occurrence of endometriosis within an episiotomy scar. We discuss the clinical presentation, diagnostic and management approach, to shed light on this rare manifestation of endometriosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background This retrospective study evaluated the clinical features of perineal endometriosis (PEM) and established a prognostic nomogram for recurrence probability in patients treated with surgical resection. Methods This study enrolled 130 PEM patients who had received surgical treatment in Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) between January 1992 and September 2020. We collected their clinical features and conducted outpatient or telephone follow-up. The predictive nomogram was constructed based on 104 patients who had completed follow-up by July 2021. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the prognostic effects of multiple clinical parameters on recurrence. The Index of concordance (C-index) and calibration curves were used to access the discrimination ability and predictive accuracy of the nomogram respectively, and the results were further validated via bootstrap resampling. Calculating the area under the curve (AUC) via risk scores of patients aimed to further access the predictive power of the model. In addition, the survival curve was depicted using Kaplan–Meier plot and compared by log-rank method. Results Most PEM patients had been symptomatic for 24–48 months before the lesion resection. With a median 99.00 (interquartile range: 47.25–137.50) months of postoperative observation, there were 16 (15.1%) out of 104 cases who finished follow-up reported symptomatic recurrence. On multivariate analysis of derivation cohort, multiple lesions, microscopically positive margin (mPM) and anal sphincter involvement (ASI) were selected into the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting recurrence was 0.84 (95% CI 0.77–0.91). The calibration curve for probability of recurrence for 36, 60 and 120 months showed great agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation. Furthermore, the AUCs of risk score for 36, 60 and 120 months were 0.89, 0.87 and 0.82 respectively. Conclusions PEM is a rare kind of endometriosis and surgery is the primary treatment. Multiple lesions and ASI are independent risk factors for postoperative recurrence, and wide resection with more peripheral tissue could be preferred. The proposed nomogram resulted in effective prognostic prediction for PEM patients receiving surgical excision. In addition, this predictive nomogram needs external data sets to further validate its prognostic accuracy in the future.

Background: This retrospective study evaluated the clinical features of perineal endometriosis (PEM) and established a prognostic nomogram for recurrence probability in patients treated with surgical resection. Methods: This study enrolled 130 PEM patients who had received surgical treatment in Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) between January 1992 and September 2020. We collected their clinical features and conducted outpatient or telephone follow-up. The predictive nomogram was constructed based on 104 patients who had completed follow-up by July 2021. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the prognostic effects of multiple clinical parameters on recurrence. The Index of concordance (C-index) and calibration curves were used to access the discrimination ability and predictive accuracy of the nomogram respectively, and the results were further validated via bootstrap resampling. Calculating the area under the curve (AUC) via risk scores of patients aimed to further access the predictive power of the model. In addition, the survival curve was depicted using Kaplan–Meier plot and compared by log-rank method. Results: Most PEM patients had been symptomatic for 24–48 months before the lesion resection. With a median 99.00 (interquartile range: 47.25–137.50) months of postoperative observation, there were 16 (15.1%) out of 104 cases who finished follow-up reported symptomatic recurrence. On multivariate analysis of derivation cohort, multiple lesions, microscopically positive margin (mPM) and anal sphincter involvement (ASI) were selected into the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting recurrence was 0.84 (95% CI 0.77–0.91). The calibration curve for probability of recurrence for 36, 60 and 120 months showed great agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation. Furthermore, the AUCs of risk score for 36, 60 and 120 months were 0.89, 0.87 and 0.82 respectively. Conclusions: PEM is a rare kind of endometriosis and surgery is the primary treatment. Multiple lesions and ASI are independent risk factors for postoperative recurrence, and wide resection with more peripheral tissue could be preferred. The proposed nomogram resulted in effective prognostic prediction for PEM patients receiving surgical excision. In addition, this predictive nomogram needs external data sets to further validate its prognostic accuracy in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Endometriosis is a chronic disease with the presence of endometrium-like tissue containing endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus. The incidence of episiotomy scar endometriosis after vaginal delivery is 0.06–0.7%. Case presentation: A 28-year-old parous woman with two previous vaginal deliveries with episiotomy presented to the outpatient department with severe pain and swelling in the perineal region over the past year, leading to difficulty in sitting, coitus and routine essential activities like defecation. She had undergone local perineal nodule excision surgery twice, which confirmed her perineal scar endometriosis diagnosis one year earlier at another hospital with no improvement in symptoms. Physical examination revealed a firm, tender, deeply embedded palpable nodule measuring approximately 3 ‐ 4 cm in the left posterolateral aspect of the distal vagina. Wide local excision of the nodule with a clear margin of 1 cm was performed. The nodule extended up to the left ischial tuberosity and apex up to the pudendal vessels complex. Discussion: The classic diagnostic triad of perineal endometriosis were present in this patient. Surgical intervention with wide local excision with a clear margin of approximately 1 cm of healthy tissue reduces the chance of recurrence. Conclusion: Awareness of this condition among medical practitioners will lead to early diagnosis and excision. Timely intervention in the form of excision with free margins is the definitive treatment and provides complete pain relief and good quality of life for endometriosis patients.

Endometriosis is a frequent gynecological disease among women of reproductive age, a benign condition with an uncertain etiology, but with multiple theories being proposed as main mechanisms of development. Perineal endometriosis is an uncommon condition, with various theories about its pathogenesis including the contiguous propagation of endometrial tissue over the episiotomy perineal scar. A 36-year-old woman, G2 P2, presented with cyclic inflammation and pain in the episiotomy area, with significant impairment of her daily quality of life. Clinical examination revealed a palpable mass in the episiotomy area and a probable clinical diagnosis of perineal scar endometriosis was considered, with further investigation being recommended. The patient was surgically treated by local excision of the perineal mass and the histopathologic examination of the mass confirmed the diagnosis of perineal endometriosis in the episiotomy scar. Although perineal endometriosis remains a rare condition, it should be considered in all patients with an anterior vaginal delivery and a painful perineal mass during menstrual cycle, a wide excision of the affected tissue remaining the best option for a permanent cure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Episiotomy scar endometriosis is an extremely rare entity and often causes diagnostic uncertainty. Case report: We report a case of perineal swelling and cyclical pain following obstetric delivery with episiotomy. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed possible episiotomy scar endometriosis confined to the perineum. Wide surgical excision was performed and the histopathological report confirmed the diagnosis. No recurrence was noted after the surgery. Conclusion: Episiotomy scar endometriosis should be considered whenever a woman with previous episiotomy presents with cyclical pain or a nodule in the perineum. Magnetic resonance imaging can assist with the diagnosis and wide excision remains the best treatment option for this condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the present pictorial we show the ultrasonographic appearances of endometriosis in atypical sites. Scar endometriosis may present as a hypoechoic solid nodule with hyperechoic spots while umbilical endometriosis may appear as solid or partially cystic areas with ill-defined margins. In the case of endometriosis of the rectus muscle, ultrasonography usually demonstrates a heterogeneous hypoechogenic formation with indistinct edges. Inguinal endometriosis is quite variable in its ultrasonographic presentation showing a completely solid mass or a mixed solid and cystic mass. The typical ultrasonographic finding associated with perineal endometriosis is the presence of a solid lesion near to the episiotomy scar. Under ultrasonography, appendiceal endometriosis is characterized by a solid lesion in the wall of the small bowel, usually well defined. Superficial hepatic endometriosis is characterized by a small hypoechoic lesion interrupting the hepatic capsula, usually hyperechoic. Ultrasound endometriosis of the pancreas is characterized by a small hypoechoic lesion while endometriosis of the kidney is characterized by a hyperechoic small nodule. Diaphragmatic endometriosis showed typically small hypoechoic lesions. Only peripheral nerves can be investigated using ultrasound, with a typical solid appearance. In conclusion, ultrasonography seems to have a fundamental role in the majority of endometriosis cases in “atypical” sites, in all the cases where “typical” clinical findings are present.

Objective(s): Abdominal and perineal scar endometriosis usually develop in association with a prior surgical scar. The purpose of the study was to detect and review patients' characteristics of these women over a long period.Study Design: We retrospectively review the clinical records of 860 women with endometriosis between 1989 and 2019. Data were collected and analyzed from medical and pathological reports of 40 patients with abdominal and perineal scar endometriosis.Results: 26 patients (3,0 %) were detected in the abdominal wall endometriosis group (AWE) (mean age 36,5 ± 3,4 years) and 14(1,6 %) cases in the perineal endometriosis (PE) group (32,5 ± 2,4 years), respectively. We observed that 92,3 % of women with AWE had undergone at least 1 cesarean section. Moreover, the majority of patients presented with abdominal pain (77, 0 %) and sensation of a mass (96,2 %). 15,4 % of cases had concurrent pelvic endometriosis and the recurrent rate of the disease was 15,4 %. All cases with perineal scar endometriosis were multiparous and delivered vaginally with episiotomy. 92,8 % of patients presented with cyclical pain and swelling. 3 cases suffered from perineal endometriosis combined with pelvic endometriosis. There was a recurrence of perineal endometriosis in 2 women (14,2 %). Surgical excision was the standard treatment of this condition and tissue biopsy confirmed the diagnosis.Conclusions: Abdominal wall and perineal scar endometriosis are rare, multifactorial entities which are associated mainly with cesarean section and vaginal episiotomy. Clinicians should be aware of these conditions among all women of reproductive age presenting with cyclic or non-cyclic pain and swelling at the incision sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endometriosis nodes are observed in extra pelvic locations, particularly in gynaecological scars, with the abdominal wall being one of the most frequent locations. The main objective of the study is to review patient characteristics of cases of endometriosis nodes in gynaecological scars. Methods: A retrospective, observational and descriptive study with a cohort of patients from Hospital 12 de Octubre was conducted from January 2000 to January 2012. We analysed all of the patients who presented with an endometriosis node in a gynaecological scar presentation who had undergone surgery in that period. Descriptive data were collected and analysed. Results: A total of 17 patients with an anatomopathological diagnosis of an endometriosis node in a gynaecological scar were found. The following variables were studied: the age at diagnosis (32.5 years +/- 5.5 years), personal and obstetric history, time from surgery to diagnosis (4.2 years +/- 3.4 years), symptoms (a painful mass that grows during menstruation is the most frequent symptom in our patients), technical analyses by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) or fine needle aspiration (FNA) (77% of the patients), node size (2.5 cm +/- 1.1 cm) and location (caesarean scar, 82%; episiotomy scar, 11.7%; and laparoscopic surgery port, 5.8%), involvement of adjacent structures (29% of the patients), treatment (exeresis with a security margin in all the patients) and other endometriosis locations (14% of the patients). Conclusions: A high level of suspicion is required to diagnose gynaecological scar endometriosis, which should be suspected in the differential diagnosis of scar masses in reproductive-aged women. Several theories have been proposed to explain the formation of endometriosis nodes in extrauterine localizations. The two of them that seem to be more plausible are the metaplasia and transport theories. Imaging with ultrasound, CT and MR facilitate the diagnosis. FNA could be used for preoperative diagnosis. Treatment must be by node resection with a security margin. In some cases, surgery could be combined with hormonal treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the appropriate measures for diagnosing and treating perineal endometriosis (PEM) with anal sphincter involvement. METHODS Between January 1992 and April 2011, the clinical features, diagnosis and management of 31 patients who were diagnosed with PEM with anal sphincter involvement at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively analyzed using their clinical records. A range of 6–78 months of outpatient follow-up after surgery were conducted for these 31 patients but was extended by telephone interviews with 29 patients conducted in December 2011. RESULTS All 31 patients had a history of vaginal delivery. The level of serum CA125 was elevated in only 2 (6.5%) cases. All cases received surgical treatment, which included narrow excision (NE, close to the edge of the endometrioma) with primary sphincteroplasty (PSp) for 30 cases and incomplete excision (IE) for 1 case. Of the 30 cases in the NE group, 20 (66.7%) received hormone therapy preoperatively. Up until December 2011, there was one recurrence (3.6%) of PEM in the NE group. PEM relapse occurred in the IE patient 6 years after the initial IE surgery. Perineal abscesses were found in one patient post-operatively. No complaint of dyspareunia and no fecal incontinence episodes were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Based on our own experience, NE and PSp may be indicated for the treatment of PEM with anal sphincter involvement. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Copyright of MedULA is the property of Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Venezuela and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In the present pictorial we show the ultrasonographic appearances of endometriosis in atypical sites. Scar endometriosis may present as a hypoechoic solid nodule with hyperechoic spots while umbilical endometriosis may appear as solid or partially cystic areas with ill-defined margins. In the case of endometriosis of the rectus muscle, ultrasonography usually demonstrates a heterogeneous hypoechogenic formation with indistinct edges. Inguinal endometriosis is quite variable in its ultrasonographic presentation showing a completely solid mass or a mixed solid and cystic mass. The typical ultrasonographic finding associated with perineal endometriosis is the presence of a solid lesion near to the episiotomy scar. Under ultrasonography, appendiceal endometriosis is characterized by a solid lesion in the wall of the small bowel, usually well defined. Superficial hepatic endometriosis is characterized by a small hypoechoic lesion interrupting the hepatic capsula, usually hyperechoic. Ultrasound endometriosis of the pancreas is characterized by a small hypoechoic lesion while endometriosis of the kidney is characterized by a hyperechoic small nodule. Diaphragmatic endometriosis showed typically small hypoechoic lesions. Only peripheral nerves can be investigated using ultrasound, with a typical solid appearance. In conclusion, ultrasonography seems to have a fundamental role in the majority of endometriosis cases in "atypical" sites, in all the cases where "typical" clinical findings are present. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The prevalence of perineal endometriosis (PEM) is low among women with endometriosis (EM) treated by surgery. It manifests as hard or cystic nodules with pain in the perineal wounds and surrounding areas. Implantation theory is regarded as the main pathogenesis of PEM. There are few clinical studies on the incidence and clinical characteristics of PEM. This study aims to summarize the clinical data of 14 PEM cases and analyze the factors that may be related to the incubation period and pain., Aim: To analyze the medical history, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment and treatment effect of PEM., Methods: The present study is a case series. We collected the clinical data and follow-up data of 14 patients with PEM who visited The International Peace Maternal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University from January 2009 to December 2019. Paired t test and Pearson correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: The 14 patients included had a history of vaginal delivery. All patients underwent PEM lesion resection. Three patients were treated by levator ani muscle repair at the same time and 1 patient underwent extensive PEM lesion resection and anal sphincter repair. Body mass index (BMI) at delivery and BMI within 1 mo after delivery were negatively correlated with the latent period, respectively ( R 2 = 0.53/0.86, P < 0.05). The average visual analog scale score in lesions at the third month after surgery was 0.57 ± 1.28 for all patients, which was significantly lower than that prior to surgery ( P < 0.05). One patient relapsed during the sixth month after surgery, and to date, no recurrence occurred after the second surgery., Conclusion: The higher the BMI during delivery and within 1 mo after delivery, the shorter the incubation period of PEM. It is very important to evaluate the location of lesions before surgery. Surgical resection of the lesion is the best treatment for PEM and results in significant alleviation of symptoms. Therefore, following the diagnosis of PEM, immediate surgery is recommended., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Liang Y and Zhang D have received research funding from the medical-engineering cross fund from Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. ZH2018QNB17; and Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81801400., (©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Presents a case of endometriosis in an episiotomy scar preceding pelvic endometriosis. Background of the case; Symptom of perineal endometriosis; Possible causes of endometriosis.