Search

BackgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is influenced by several factors (e.g., patient's readiness to engage, clinician's skills, and the cultural environment). Availability of reliable and valid self-reported measures of the ACP domains is crucial, including cross-cultural equivalence.AimTo culturally adapt into Italian the 19-item Quality of Communication (QOC) and the 4-item ACP Engagement (4-item ACP-E) questionnaires.MethodsWe translated and culturally adapted the two questionnaires and produced a significant other (SO) version of the QOC (QOC-SO). Each questionnaire was field tested via cognitive interviews with users: nine patients (QOC, 4-item ACP-E) and three SOs (QOC-SO) enrolled at three palliative care services.ResultsWe made minor changes to 5/19 QOC items, to improve clarity and internal consistency; we changed the response option 'didn't do' into 'not applicable'. Finally, we slightly revised the QOC to adapt it to the paper/electronic format. QOC debriefing revealed that the section on end of life was emotionally challenging for both patients and SOs. We simplified the 4-item ACP-E layout, added a sentence in the introduction, and revised the wording of one item, to improve coherence with the Italian ACP legislation. ACP-E debriefing did not reveal any major issue.ConclusionsResults were satisfactory in terms of semantic, conceptual and normative equivalence of both questionnaires. Acceptability was satisfactory for the 4-item ACP-E, while findings of the QOC cognitive debriefing informed a major amendment of a pilot trial protocol on ACP in multiple sclerosis (ConCure-SM): use of the interviewer version only, in an adaptive form. Psychometric testing of both questionnaires on a large, independent sample will follow.

Research question and aim: Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) aim to support healthcare professionals (HPs) and healthcare organizations to deal with the ethical issues of clinical practice. In 2020, a CEC was established in an Oncology Research Hospital in the North of Italy. This paper describes the development process and the activities performed 20 months from the CEC's implementation, to increase knowledge about CEC's implementation strategy. Research design: We collected quantitative data related to number and characteristics of CEC activities carried out from October 2020 to June 2022 using the CEC internal database. Data were reported descriptively and compared with data from the literature to provide a complete overview of the CEC's development and implementation process. Participants and research context: The study has been conducted at the local health authority (LHA) of Reggio Emilia. It is a report of the activities provided by the CEC, where no HPs or patients were involved. Ethical Considerations: The report is part of a larger study named EVAluating a Clinical Ethics Committee implementation process (EvaCEC), which has been approved by the Local Ethics Committee (AUSLRE Protocollo n° 2022/0026554 of 24/02/2022). EvaCEC is also the first author's PhD project. Findings: In total, the CEC performed 7 ethics consultations (EC), published three policies related to particular ethical questions of clinical and organizational practice, provided one educational online course on ethics consultation targeting employed HPs, and promoted a specific dissemination process among the different departments of the LHA. According to our results, the CEC widely fulfilled the standard threefold set of clinical ethics support services tasks (namely, ethics consultation, ethics education, and policy development), but further investigations are needed to evaluate the CEC's impact on clinical practice. Conclusion: Our findings may increase knowledge regarding the composition, role, and tasks of a CEC in an Italian setting, informing future strategies and efforts to regulate these institutions officially. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Advance care planning (ACP) is considered a pivotal aid in the decision‐making process, especially for many people living with dementia, who inevitably will lose the capacity to make decisions at the end of life. In Italy, ACP has been recently regulated by law 219/2017, leading to the investigation of how physicians deal with ACP in dementia. In order to comprehend the perception of physicians who provide care for patients with dementia regarding ACP and to describe their difficulties and needs, this study presents the results of a qualitative research study performed within a local health authority in northern Italy. Data were collected by semi‐structured interviews with 11 physicians dealing with patients with dementia and were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Four superordinate themes were identified, describing both the difficulties and challenges perceived by physicians in performing shared ACP in their daily activities. This study demonstrates that physicians experience troubles synchronizing the time of shared ACP with the more rapid development of dementia. Results also suggest that further training about communication on ACP is urgently required to ease the implementation of shared ACP. A broader involvement of institutions and other professionals is also important in spreading ACP among healthcare institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A Clinical ethics committee (Cec) has been implemented in an Oncology Research Institute in Northern Italy with the aim of supporting healthcare professionals in addressing ethical issues related to clinical practice. This article describes the development and the activities carried out in 3 years since Cec's implementation. Our experience may increase knowledge of the role and opportunities of Cecs in the Italian context, and provide information on useful strategies for their regulation.

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The Go Wish Game (GWG) is a practical tool developed to ease advance care planning (ACP) conversations regarding end-of-life (EOL) issues. The game consists of a guide and 35 cards to help persons think about their personal values and priorities in the context of care and to discuss and share those concerns with families and health care professionals (HPs). <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To promote ACP conversations in the Italian context, we developed an Italian version of the GWG by linguistic translation and cultural adaptation. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Cross-cultural adaptation process developed by Beaton et al. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> We started with a back-and-forth translation to guarantee linguistic appropriateness. A prefinal Italian version was developed and then qualitatively evaluated by two focus groups (FGs) to assess content validity and cultural appropriateness. Participants' suggestions were discussed by the research groups and included in the final Italian version. <b><i>Data analysis:</i></b> The FGs' transcripts were analyzed by thematic analysis. <b><i>Sample:</i></b> One FG included HPs potentially involved in ACP, the second FG involved representative from local patient associations (RLPAs) with chronic, degenerative, and potentially terminal disease. Participants were purposefully selected. The two FGs involved eight HPs and five RLPAs, respectively. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Fewer explicit statements concerning EOL choices and a broader emphasis on the role of HPs in this discussion characterized the prefinal version. Our analysis identified three themes and five subthemes: (1) <i>improving translation</i>: linguistic redefinition and practical clarification; (2) <i>how to play the GWG</i>: needs and suggestions; and (3) <i>more than a game</i>. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The Italian version developed in this study presents several cultural peculiarities. The rigorous translation and cultural adaptation process applied can enrich the existing literature by spreading a practical tool for initiating ACP in other languages and cultures. Further studies are needed to evaluate this tool's effectiveness in supporting ACP and training HPs to promote the ACP process.