Search

The spontaneous physical dependence of buprenorphine was assessed in opioid addicts who switched from heroin to sublingual or intravenous buprenorphine. Twenty-two patients were randomly assigned to double-blind administration of methadone (n=11) or placebo (n=11) for 13 days after abrupt withdrawal of buprenorphine. Methadone was administered according to four pre-established dosing schedules depending on the previous amount of daily consumed buprenorphine. No methadone-treated patient required modification of the therapeutic regimen, whereas eight of eleven placebo-treated patients needed treatment with methadone. Buprenorphine withdrawal syndrome was of opioid type, began somewhat more slowly, and showed a peak until day 5. The occurrence, time-course and characteristics of buprenorphine withdrawal syndrome make it necessary to reconsider the abuse potential of this analgesic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The efficacy of clonidine, methadone, and guanfacine in rapid detoxification of heroin inpatients was assessed in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Signs and symptoms of abstinence and of side effects were analysed in 90 heroin addicts successfully completing a 12-day inpatient trial, all patients fit DSM-III criteria for opioid dependence, the age range being 18 to 36 years. All three drugs were effective in controlling abstinence; however, the course of abstinence was different in the methadone group as compared to the adrenergic agonists, the latter showing limitations in their ability to suppress withdrawal manifestations. While mean number of withdrawal signs and symptoms was significantly lower during days 2 to 5 in the methadone group (p.<0.01), adrenergic agonists were slightly more effective at the end of the trial. Incidence of side effects was closely related to the dose administered. Hypotensive action of adrenergic agonists was more marked in orthostatic position. The present results suggest that methadone is superior to adrenergic agonists. Between these drugs clonidine appears to be less effective than guanfacine in controlling some withdrawal manifestations, and causes more side effects, mainly of cardiovascular nature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Predictors of either detoxification success or failure were evaluated during an inpatient trial that compared the efficacy of methadone, clonidine and guanfacine for rapid heroin detoxification. The analysis of such predictors was stimulated by the fact that in order to achieve 90 patients who completed the study (30 in each group), a total of 170 patients had to be included. Of 80 detoxification failures, 10 occurred in the methadone group, 32 in the guanfacine group, and 38 in the clonidine group. Voluntary request for discontinuation of the detoxification schedule was the first cause of failure. There were not statistically significant differences with regard to sociodemographic characteristics and pattern of drug consumption among patients in the three groups who completed detoxification with success or failure. The treatment drug, the type of schedule and the score obtained from the Symptom Checklist-90/Revised (SCL-90/R) were the only predictors of either detoxification success or failure. Inpatient opioid detoxification would be a useful strategy for patients with more severe psychological symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]